Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

A Mesozoic bird from Gondwana preserving feathers


The fossil record of birds in the Mesozoic of Gondwana is mostly based on isolated and often poorly preserved specimens, none of which has preserved details on feather anatomy. We provide the description of a fossil bird represented by a skeleton with feathers from the Early Cretaceous of Gondwana (NE Brazil). The specimen sheds light on the homology and 3D structure of the rachis-dominated feathers, previously known from two-dimensional slabs. The rectrices exhibit a row of rounded spots, probably corresponding to some original colour pattern. The specimen supports the identification of the feather scapus as the rachis, which is notably robust and elliptical in cross-section. In spite of its juvenile nature, the tail plumage resembles the feathering of adult individuals of modern birds. Documentation of rachis-dominated tail in South American enantiornithines broadens the paleobiogeographic distribution of basal birds with this tail feather morphotype, up to now only reported from China.


Cretaceous birds with feathers are very rare fossils with exceptional preservation. Most specimens and valuable information on feathers in early birds have been recovered from the Lower Cretaceous Jehol Group (Hauterivian through Aptian) in NE China (for example, see refs 1, 2). The Jehol fossil record comprises an extraordinary taxonomic diversity of basal birds preserving feathers including Jeholornis, Confuciusornithiformes and Enantiornithes, among others2,3. This evidence currently constitutes the most informative source to understand the early evolution of bird feathers. However, some skeletal remains associated with poorly preserved feathers have also been recovered in the Dundargalant Gorizont (Hauterivian-Barremian) of Mongolia4, and the Formación Calizas de La Huérguina (Barremian) beds from Spain (for example, see ref. 5).

Among the most curious fossil feather morphotypes is the ribbon-like or rachis-dominated type of feather (see refs 2, 6). They are usually described as proximally ribbon-like with distally restricted barbs, a morphology not documented among living birds7. Because most fossils are preserved in two dimensions, the detailed anatomy of these tail feathers still remains in debate. They have been variously suggested as representing an scale-like structure intermediate in morphology between the reptilian and bird integuments, a modified pennaceous feather, or a unique type of primitive feather2,3,8,9,10,11,12.

Here we present the discovery of a fully articulated skeleton associated with feathers, belonging to a minute enantiornithine bird from the Crato Formation (Lower Cretaceous) of Brazil. The specimen constitutes the most complete avian specimen of Early Cretaceous age from Gondwana; more importantly, it sheds light on the anatomical structure and probable function of the peculiar rachis-dominated tail feathers. Notably, the new specimen preserves feathers in relief; thus helping to recognize key features of the rachis-dominated feathers.


Systematic paleontology

Aves Linnaeus, 1758Ornithothoraces Chiappe, 1996Enantiornithes Walker, 1981Euenantiornithes Chiappe and Walker, 2002Indeterminate genus and species

Referred material

UFRJ-DG (Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Department of Geology collection) 031 Av, partial skeleton of a possible juvenile specimen preserved in slab and counterslab (Supplementary Fig. 1), including poorly preserved skull bones, fore- and hindlimbs, portions of vertebral column, and most of both pectoral and pelvic girdles (see details in Supplementary Note 1). The skeleton is exposed in lateral view, but the proximal caudal vertebrae and pygostyle are exposed dorsally. The same applies to the tail feathers, attached to the pygostyle.

The very small body size (Supplementary Note 2), large orbit, elongate caudal series, poorly developed proximal humerus and distal ends of other long bones (femur, tibia), as well as the lack of fusion in the metatarsus indicates that the specimen is probably a juvenile13,14,15.

Locality and horizon

Pedra Branca Mine, Nova Olinda County, Ceará State, Brazil (7° 6′51.9″S, 39° 41′46.9″W). Araripe Basin, Crato Formation (Early Cretaceous, Aptian). This formation has yielded abundant and exceptionally preserved fossils of a large variety of plants and animals, representing one of the best well-known terrestrial ecosystems for the Early Cretaceous16. Isolated feathers probably belonging to birds have been described from these beds17,18, as well as succinct reports on avian skeletons associated with poorly preserved feathers 19.

Description and comparisons

The specimen is the size of a hummingbird (approximately 6 cm from snout to tip of pygostile; Fig. 1; Supplementary Fig. 2). The skull is poorly preserved (Supplementary Note 1). The parietals and frontals are dorsally convex, indicating a vaulted braincase. The maxilla is subtriangular and the presence of minute alveoli supports that it was toothed. The vertebral column is represented by some cervical, dorsal, sacral and caudal vertebrae. Cervical centra are elongate, lacking pneumatic foramina. The neural spines are dorsoventrally tall and subrectangular in lateral view. Mid-dorsal centra are proportionally short, resembling more the proportions of basal enantiornithines (for example, Iberomesornis20), rather than the elongate condition of derived enantiornithines (for example, Gobipteryx21). Deep excavations are present on the lateral surface of the centra, and parapophyses are located high on the centrum, as usual among Enantiornithes22. Dorsal neural spines are subrectangular in contour (Supplementary Fig. 3). Caudal vertebrae are represented by eight free segments distally articulated with a pygostyle (Supplementary Fig. 4). Free caudals have short centra (Supplementary Fig. 5). The pygostyle is cone-shaped, composed by eight fused vertebrae, and longer than the combined length of the free caudals. The proximal end of the pygostyle is cone-shaped, and bears two subparallel longitudinal ridges as diagnostic of Enantiornithes23.

Figure 1: Main slab and interpretative drawing of specimen UFRJ-DG 031 Av.

(a) Main slab. (b) Interpretative drawing of the skeleton and feathers. (c) Reconstructed cross-section at the level of distal vanes of the feathers. (d) Reconstructed cross-section at mid-length of the rachis. (e) Reconstructed cross-section of the calamus. al, alula; cd, free caudal vertebrae; dv, dorsal vertebrae; fr, frontals; lc, left coracoid; lcp, left carpometacarpus; lf, left foot; lh, left humerus; lr, left radius; ls, left scapula; lu, left ulna; mx, maxilla; pub, pubes; py, pygostyle; ra, rachis; rc, right coracoid; rh, right humerus; rr, right radius; rt, right tibiotarsus; rtmt, right metatarsals; ru, right ulna; sp, colour spots; v, vanes. Dark grey represents the vanes, light grey represents the scapus. Scale bar, 10 mm.

The coracoid is elongate and narrow, lacking a procoracoid. The scapula bears a prominent and tapered acromion. The humeral head is rounded head, the bicipital tubercle is poorly developed, and the capital groove and the transverse ligament groove are both absent. This simple proximal humeral morphology is reminiscent of juvenile enantiornithes13, as well as basal enantiornithines (for example, Iberomesornis, Eocathayornis24,25), and different from the more complex anatomy of adult-derived enantiornithines (for example, Martinavis, Enantiornis, Gobipteryx, Halimornis21,26,27,28). The distal end of the humerus is transversely expanded, although not to the degree seen in most Euenantiornithes28. The ulna is nearly as long as the humerus, a condition that contrasts with the much shorter proportions of several Euenantiornithes27,28. The radius exhibits a longitudinal groove diagnostic of Euenantiornithes20. The manus is subequal to ulnar length. Metacarpal II is shorter and than metacarpal III, a diagnostic condition of Euenantiornithes28 (Supplementary Fig. 5).

The pelvic girdle is fragmentary. Distally, the pubes exhibit a well-developed symphysis. The femur is nearly straight, and the femoral head is dorsally oriented. The tibiotarsus length is slightly shorter than the femur. The metatarsals are elongate and transversely narrow (metatarsal III subequal in length to tibiotarsus; Supplementary Fig. 6). The distal end of metatarsal I is caudally deflected, as diagnostic of Enantiornithes20. Metatarsal II is relatively robust but not wider than metatarsal III, a condition similar to other Enantiornithes20. Metatarsal IV is transversely compressed, particularly at its distal end, and is thinner than the remaining metatarsals, as characteristic of Enantiornithes20. Pedal digit III is narrow and extremely elongate, being much longer than the corresponding metatarsal, a condition shared with Bohaiornithidae29. Phalanx 1-I is elongate and robust, being the stoutest element of the foot. Pedal unguals are elongate and slightly curved, as occurs in Bohaiornithidae29. Digit I ungual is strongly curved, much more than the remaining unguals, a condition regarded as diagnostic of Enantiornithes30.

The skeleton of UFRJ-DG 031 Av is covered by filamentous feathers, including approximately ten preserved secondary remiges anchored on the forearm. Left alula is represented by some asymmetrical feathers attached to digit I. Among preserved feathers, the paired rectrices are the most remarkable (Fig. 2). They are rachis dominated in morphology, similar to those already known among Enantiornithes and Confusiusornithiformes2,5,6. The rectrices are considerably elongate, being roughly 30% longer than length of skeleton. The femur/rectrix ratio is 0.16, similar to other enantiornithines (for example, Dapingfangornis, 0.15; Paraprotopteryx, 0.17 (ref. 2)). The rectrices insert on the third proximal pygostyle vertebra. The proximal portion of each feather that contacts the cone-shaped pygostyle is here interpreted as the calamus, whereas the remaining portion of feathers is identified as the rachis. The base of the rachis bears a row of five granulate spots, which we interpret as remnants of an ornamental colour pattern. The spots are distributed in a symmetrical paired line along both rectrices and shows comparable morphology, size, contour and colour. On this basis, we hypothesize that these spots may reflect the colour pattern of the feather and not a taphonomical artefact.

Figure 2: Details of tail feather of specimen UFRJ-DG 031 Av.

(a) Proximal end. (b) Distal end. cal, calamus; lg, longitudinal groove; ra, rachis; sp, colour spot; v, vane. Scale bar, 2.5 mm.

Each feather preserves a narrow groove extending from the base up to its distal end, traversing through the rows of spots. The rachis is slightly convex at mid-length, with the midline groove bisecting such a transverse convexity. The rachis flattens distally where it became vaned. The feather is symmetrical, as expressed by subequally sized vanes. As occurs in confuciusornithiforms and some enantiornithines2,5,8, the barbs are restricted to the distal 15% of feather length. Barbs size increase towards the distal end of feather. Each barb appears to be dorsoventrally thick and dorsally convex, and of uniform thickness and width for most of its length. No signs of the interlocking barbules are visible.

Phylogenetic analysis

Phylogenetic relationships of UFRJ-DG 031 Av were analysed in the context of a comprehensive study of enantiornithines evolution (see Supplementary Notes 3 and 4; Supplementary Fig. 7). UFRJ-DG 031 Av exhibits the following synapomorphies of this clade of extinct birds20,23,30,31,32: pygostyle with ventrolateral processes, coracoid laterally convex, scapulocoracoid articulation with scapular pit and coracoidal tuber, metacarpal III more distally projected than metacarpal II, distal tarsals fused to proximal metatarsus, but remaining portion of metatarsals free and metatarsal I distal condyles caudally reflected (J-shaped). Derived features of Euenantiornithes present in UFRJ-DG 031 Av include radius with a posterior longitudinal groove, posterior femoral trochanter large and metatarsal IV significantly thinner than metatarsals II and III (ref. 28). Inclusion of UFRJ-DG 031 Av within data matrix offered by O’Connor and Zhou31 results in a polytomy of most enantiornithine genera. However, UFRJ-DG 031 Av exhibits some general similarities with Iberomesornis, Pengornis, Eopengornis and Eoenantiornis, such as a humeral head globose and projected further proximally, a capital groove poorly defined on proximal humerus, and dorsal vertebral centra craniocaudally short7,20,32,33. However, the differences noted in the diagnosis and description preclude considering UFRJ-DG 031 Av as nearly related to any of these taxa until more evidence becomes available.


A large number of Early Cretaceous basal pygostylians preserving feathers (that is, confuciusornithids, enantiornithines) show an enigmatic kind of tail formed by a pair of elongate rectrices known as ‘ribbon-like’ or ‘rachis-dominated’ feathers, which are unknown in living birds1,2,5,6. These feathers consist on a rachis-dominated proximal half with a barbed distal portion8. In contrast, Sapeornis, basal ornithuromorphs and a single possible enantiornithine, have a fan-shaped morphotype made up by a series of short rectrices, resembling that present in most living birds2,34.

Basic anatomy of rachis-dominated feathers remains difficult to interpret for two reasons: the absence of this kind of feather among living birds2 and the two-dimensional preservation of available specimens. This has lead to contradicting interpretations among authors. For example, Zhang et al.6,35 thought that the obscure longitudinal stripe represents a thin rachis, the lighter regions on each side of the ‘ribbon’ constitutes undifferentiated vanes and the distal pennaceous portion forms a tapering extension of the ribbon-like rachis. Prum35, in contrast, hypothesized that the ribbon-like basal portion of the feather is formed by the dorsoventrally depressed and laterally expanded rachis. In the later context, some authors2,8,12,36 interpreted that the midline stripe of the scapus constitutes the longitudinal groove present on the ventral surface of rachis, and the flat regions of the sides of the stripe represent an expanded rachis.

In contrast with fossil bird specimens from China and Spain, the rectrices of UFRJ-DG 031 Av are preserved in relief, thus helping to confirm the midline dark stripe in the ribbon-like portion of the feather is not the rachis, but a longitudinal groove. Furthermore, the lateral expansions of the scapus are convex (and not flat, as feather vanes are) and accommodate barbs, thus this section may be interpreted as an expanded rachis. This evidence counters previous authors (for example, see ref. 3) interpreting that most of the shaft is the calamus, and that the rachis restricts to the distal pennaceous region. Foth3 proposed that the median longitudinal line represents the medullar cavity of calamus. However, in UFRJ-DG 031 Av, the midline stripe does not represent a medullar cavity, but a dorsal groove. Moreover, the presence of a string of spots (probably corresponding to colour patterns) constitutes additional evidence in support that this basal part of the feather was not embedded into the dermis, thus dismissing the interpretation that it corresponds to the calamus. We concur with Prum37 and O’Connor et al.2 in proposing the proximally narrow portion as an expanded rachis, rather than the calamus.

O’Connor et al.2 and Wang et al.7 interpreted that a narrow dark halo bordering the lateral margins of the rachis of rectricial feathers of Enantiornithes represented an undifferentiated vane. In sharp contrast with this pattern, specimen UFRJ-DG 031 Av shows that the base of the rachis is devoid of barbs, and that the first recognizable barbs emerge at nearly mid-length of the scapus and do not form an undifferentiated vane. Such differences may indicate that the rectricial morphology among enantiornithes was more variable than previously thought, and reveals a new aspect of variability not recognized before for the clade.

Information from UFRJ-DG 031 Av suggests that rachis-dominated tail feathers in Enantiornithes were very robust structures, dorsoventrally depressed, elliptical in cross-section and with a longitudinal groove running for most of its length on both dorsal and ventral surfaces. This morphology contrasts with feathers in extant birds in which the rachis is subquadrangular in cross-section and the groove is only on the ventral surface and bounded by two longitudinal ridges15.

Since the discovery of elongate rectricial feathers in Confuciusornis, authors mostly agree that such elongate structures may be sexually dimorphic and associated with sexual display, species recognition or visual communication2,5,6,10,23,38. The presence of a colour pattern on the tail base of UFRJ-DG 031 Av reinforces these interpretations. Because elongate rectrices were not present uniformly among basal pygostilians, even in members of a single species (for example, Confuciusornis sanctus39), it must be concluded that the absence or presence of these peculiar feathers was not decisive for body balance, thus countering interpretations favouring this view40. In living birds with elongate streamer feathers on the tail, the rectrices change their angle of attack and angle of spread (for example, see ref. 41), and are paired with an aerodynamic fan of normal length rectrices. Furthermore, the elongate outer rectrices of living birds become thinner past the point they are aerodynamic, where they are elongated past the other tail feathers41. However, ribbon-like feathers are sharply different from these tail feathers11,12: in confuciusornithiforms and enantiornithines, the rachis-dominated rectrices are preserved sub-parallel each other. They seem to have been a rigid paired structure, with distally symmetrical vanes composed of thick and probably rigid barbs. The morphology of this tail feather is not optimized for aerodynamical purposes, and based on the evidence at hand, it is probable that the mobility of the paired rectrices probably had some restrictions and may do not spread as in living birds. However, more evidence may be needed to support this statement.

The skeletal features and minute size sustain that UFRJ-DG 031 Av is a juvenile specimen13,14,15. In contrast, its plumage is very well developed, especially its elongate tail rectrices, which show well-differentiated and long vanes and scapus. In this aspect, the tail (and probably the entire body) plumage of these enantiornithines resembles the feathering of adult individuals of modern birds15,39. Notably, a well-developed plumage, especially ornamental rectricial feathers are also present in a young juvenile enantiornithine from Jehol42, indicating that these rectrices appeared early in their ontogeny7. If this interpretation is correct, it may indicate that there probably existed major differences between the development of the plumage in Enantiornithes and living birds, in which young individuals are devoid of long and well-differentiated tail rectrices11,12,15.


Phylogenetic analysis

Present phylogenetic analysis is based on the version of O’Connor and Zhou31 data set, which constitutes the most comprehensive analysis regarding the phylogeny of Enantiornithes. The matrix was only modified by the inclusion of UFRJ-DG 031 Av. The phylogenetic analysis was performed using TNT 1.1 (SI 3). All characters were equally weighted and treated as unordered. The strict consensus tree (SI) resulted on a large polytomy at the base of Enantiornithes that comprised most genera, including specimen UFRJ-DG 031 Av.

Additional information

How to cite this article: de Souza Carvalho, I. et al. A mesozoic bird from Gondwana preserving feathers. Nat. Commun. 6:7141 doi: 10.1038/ncomms8141 (2015).


  1. 1

    Hou, L., Martin, L. D., Zhou, Z. & Feduccia, A. Early adaptive radiation of birds: evidence from fossils from northeastern China. Science 274, 1164–1167 (1996).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    O’Connor, J. K., Chiappe, L. M., Chuong, C., Bottjer, D. J. & You, H. Homology and potential cellular and molecular mechanisms for the development of unique feather morphologies in early birds. Geosciences 2, 157–177 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Foth, C. On the identification of feather structures in stem–line representatives of birds: Evidence from fossils and actuopalaeontology. Palaeontol. Z 86, 91–102 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Kurochkin, E. N. A true carinate bird from Lower Cretaceous deposits in Mongolia and other evidence of Early Cretaceous birds in Asia. Cret. Res 6, 271–278 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Sanz, J. L. et al. An Early Cretaceous bird from Spain and its implications for the evolution of avian flight. Nature 382, 442–445 (1996).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Zhang, F. C., Zhou, Z. H., Xu, X., Wang, X. L. & Sullivan, C. A bizarre Jurassic maniraptoran from China with elongate ribbon–like feathers. Nature 455, 1105–1108 (2008).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Wang, X. et al. Insights into the evolution of rachis dominated tail feathers from a new basal enantiornithine (Aves: Ornithothoraces). Biol. J. Linnean Soc. 113, 805–819 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Zhang, F. & Zhou, Z. A primitive enantiornithine bird and the origin of feathers. Science 290, 1955–1959 (2000).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Prum, R. O. & Brush, A. H. The evolutionary origin and diversification of feathers. Q. Rev. Biol. 77, 261–295 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Zheng, X., Zhang, Z. & Hou, L. A new enantiornitine bird with four long rectrices from the Early Cretaceous of northern Hebei, China. Acta Geol. Sin 81, 703–708 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Xu, X., Zheng, X. T. & You, H. L. Exceptional dinosaur fossils show ontogenetic development of early feathers. Nature 464, 1339–1341 (2010).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Xu, X., Zheng, X. T. & You, H. L. Reply: moulting tail feathers in a juvenile oviraptorosaur. Nature 468, E2 (2010).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Chiappe, L. M., Shuan, J. & Qiang, J. Juvenile birds from the Early Cretaceous of China: Implications for Enantiornithine ontogeny. Am. Mus. Novit. 3594, 1–46 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Sanz, J. L. et al. A nestling bird from the Lower Cretaceous of Spain: implications for Avian skull and neck evolution. Science 276, 1543–1546 (1997).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Lucas, A. M. & Stettenheim, P. R. Avian Anatomy– Integument US. Dept. Agricult. Handbook (1972).

  16. 16

    Martill, D. M. The Crato Fossil Beds of Brazil Cambridge Univ. (2007).

  17. 17

    Kellner, A. W. A. in Mesozoic Birds: Above the Head of Dinosaurs eds Chiappe L. M., Witmer L. M. 389–404Univ. California (2002).

  18. 18

    Sayao, J. M., Saraiva, A. A. F. & Uejima, A. M. K. New evidence of feathers in the Crato Formation supporting a reappraisal on the presence of Aves. An. Acad. Bras. Cienc. 83, 197–210 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Naish, D., Martill, D. M. & Merrick, I. in The Crato Fossil Beds of Brazil ed Martill D. M. 525–533Cambridge Univ. (2007).

  20. 20

    Sereno, P. C. Iberomesornis romerali (Ornithothoraces, Aves) re-evaluated as an enantiornithine bird Neues Jahr. Geol. Paläont. Abhand 215, 365–395 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Kurochkin, E. N. A new enantiornithid of the Mongolian Late Cretaceous, and a general appraisal of the Infraclass Enantiornithes (Aves). Russ. Acad. Sci. Special Issue 1–50 (1996).

  22. 22

    Chiappe, L. M. & Calvo, J. O. Neuquenornis volans, a new Late Cretaceous bird (Enantiornithes: Avisauridae) from Patagonia, Argentina. J. Vert. Paleont 14, 230–246 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    O'Connor, J. K., Zhou, Z. & Zhang, F. A reappraisal of Boluochia zhengi (Aves: Enantiornithes) and a discussion of intraclade diversity in the Jehol avifauna, China. J. Syst. Palaeont 9, 51–63 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Sanz, J. L. & Bonaparte, J. F. A new order of birds (Class Aves) from the Lower Cretaceous of Spain. Nat. Hist. Mus. Los Angeles County Contrib. Sci 36, 38–49 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Zhou, Z. A new and primitive enantiornithine bird from the Early Cretaceous of China. J. Vert. Paleont 22, 49–57 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Chiappe, L. M., Lamb, J. P. & Ericson, P. G. P. New enantiornithine bird from the marine Upper Cretaceous of Alabama. J. Vert. Paleont 22, 170–174 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Walker, C. A. & Dyke, G. J. Euenantiornithine birds from the Late Cretaceous of El Brete (Argentina). Irish J. Earth Sci 27, 15–62 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Chiappe, L. M. & Walker, A. Skeletal morphology and systematics of the Cretaceous Euenantiornithes (Ornithothoraces: Enantiornithes). In Mesozoic Birds: Above the Heads of Dinosaurs eds. Chiappe L. M., Witmer L. 240–267Univ. California (2002).

  29. 29

    Wang, M., Zhou, Z.-H., O’Connor, J. K. & Zelenkov, N. V. A new diverse enantiornithine family (Bohaiornithidae fam. nov.) from the Lower Cretaceous of China with information from two new species. Vert. PalAsiatica 52, 31–76 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  30. 30

    Martin, L. D. The Enantiornithes: terrestrial birds of the Cretaceous. Cour. Forsch. Senck 181, 23–36 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  31. 31

    O’Connor, J. K. & Zhou, Z. A redescription of Chaoyangia beishanensis (Aves) and a comprehensive phylogeny of Mesozoic birds. J. Syst. Paleont 11, 889–906 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32

    O’Connor, J. K. et al. Phylogenetic support for a specialized clade of Cretaceous enantiornithine birds with information from a new species. J. Vert. Paleont 29, 188–204 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33

    Zhou, Z., Clarke, J. & Zhang, F. Insight into diversity, body size and morphological evolution from the largest Early Cretaceous enantiornithine bird. J. Anatomy 212, 565–577 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34

    Clarke, J. A., Zhou, Z. & Zhang, F. Insight into the evolution of avian flight from a new clade of Early Cretaceous ornithurines from China and the morphology of Yixianornis grabaui. J. Anatomy 208, 287–308 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35

    Zhang, Z., Zhou, Z. & Benton, M. J. A primitive confuciusornithid bird from China and its implications for early avian flight. Sci. China 51, 625–639 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36

    Chiappe, L. M., Ji, S., Ji, Q. & Norell, M. A. Anatomy and systematics of the Confuciusornithidae (Theropoda: Aves) from the late mesozoic of northeastern China. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 242, 1–89 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  37. 37

    Prum, R. O. Moulting tail feathers in a juvenile oviraptorosaur. Nature 468, E1 (2010).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  38. 38

    Padian, K. & Horner, J. The evolution of ‘bizarre structures’ in dinosaurs: biomechanics, sexual selection, social selection, or species recognition? J. Zool. 283, 3–17 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39

    Chiappe, L. M., Marugán–Lobón, J., Ji, S. & Zhou, Z. Life history of a basal bird: morphometrics of the Early Cretaceous. Confuciusornis. Biol. Lett 4, 719–723 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40

    Chuong, C. M. et al. Adaptation to the sky: Defining the feather with integument fossils from Mesozoic China and experimental evidence from molecular laboratories. J. Exp. Zool. B Mol. Dev. Evol 298, 42–56 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41

    Tubaro, P. L. A comparative study of aerodynamic function and flexural stiffness of outer tail feathers in birds. J. Avian Biol. 34, 243–250 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42

    Hu, H., Zhou, Z. H. & O’Connor, J. K. A subadult specimen of Pengornis and character evolution in Enantiornithes. Vert. PalAsiatica 52, 77–97 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

Download references


We specially thank the detailed review of an early version of the MS made by J. O’Connor. We thank Cleuduardo Laurentino Dias, Devânio Ferreira Lima and Antonio Josieudo Pereira Lima who found the specimen and kindly provided it for study. We also thank Mauricius Nascimento and Bruno Rafael Santos (Geology Department, Rio de Janeiro Federal University) who produced the geological section of this study. The stereophotographs were kindly obtained by Claudia Gutterres Vilela, Daniel Coré Guedes and Leonardo Borghi (Geology Department, Rio de Janeiro Federal University). We acknowledge the financial support provided by the Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ), the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), the Fundação Coordenação de Projetos Pesquisas e Estudos Tecnológicos (COPPETEC), the Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Técnica and CONICET.

Author information




I.deS.C., F.E.N. and F.L.A. designed the project; I.deS.C., F.E.N., F.L.A, M.P.I., F.I.F. and J.A.A. performed the research; and I.deS.C., F.E.N. and F.L.A. wrote the manuscript. All authors commented on the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ismar de Souza Carvalho.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figures 1-7, Supplementary Notes 1-4 and Supplementary References (PDF 1037 kb)

Rights and permissions

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

de Souza Carvalho, I., Novas, F., Agnolín, F. et al. A Mesozoic bird from Gondwana preserving feathers. Nat Commun 6, 7141 (2015).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing