Article | Published:

Observation of coherent quench dynamics in a metallic many-body state of fermionic atoms

Nature Communications volume 6, Article number: 6009 (2015) | Download Citation

Abstract

Quantum simulation with ultracold atoms has become a powerful technique to gain insight into interacting many-body systems. In particular, the possibility to study nonequilibrium dynamics offers a unique pathway to understand correlations and excitations in strongly interacting quantum matter. So far, coherent nonequilibrium dynamics has exclusively been observed in ultracold many-body systems of bosonic atoms. Here we report on the observation of coherent quench dynamics of fermionic atoms. A metallic state of ultracold spin-polarized fermions is prepared along with a Bose–Einstein condensate in a shallow three-dimensional optical lattice. After a quench that suppresses tunnelling between lattice sites for both the fermions and the bosons, we observe long-lived coherent oscillations in the fermionic momentum distribution, with a period that is determined solely by the Fermi–Bose interaction energy. Our results show that coherent quench dynamics can serve as a sensitive probe for correlations in delocalized fermionic quantum states and for quantum metrology.

Introduction

The investigation of nonequilibrium dynamics in interacting quantum many-body systems has emerged as a major research direction in the field of ultracold atoms. It provides unique insight into quantum states, their excitation spectra1,2,3 and thermalization processes4,5. Time evolution far from equilibrium has primarily been studied using purely bosonic systems, allowing the observation of coherent quench dynamics6,7,8,9 and equilibration10,11,12 in isolated setups. Close to equilibrium, various driving protocols have been devised to use dynamics as a means for obtaining information about the excitation spectra of many-body phases in optical lattices13,14,15,16. Centre of mass oscillations in a mixture of fermionic and bosonic superfluids have been used to measure the coupling between the two superfluids17. In purely fermionic systems, nonequilibrium dynamics has been explored in transport measurements that allowed for a semi-classical theoretical description18. However, so far, the observation of coherent nonequilibrium quantum dynamics for fermions has remained elusive.

At ultracold temperatures, quantum statistics dominates and gives rise to distinctive many-body ground states for bosonic and fermionic systems19. Noninteracting bosons collectively condense into the single-particle state of lowest energy, forming a Bose–Einstein condensate (BEC). Fermions, on the other hand, obey the Pauli exclusion principle, which limits the occupation of single-particle states to a maximum of one fermion. Therefore, fermions fill the lowest energy single-particle states from bottom up and form a Fermi sea. When placed in a periodic lattice potential with M sites, the wavefunction of the BEC can be written as the product20 of identical coherent states , where |α|2 is the mean occupation per lattice site and the bosonic creation operator at site j. On the other hand, the wavefunction of an ideal Fermi gas of N identical fermions can be expressed by the product of the N quasi-momentum eigenstates with energy eigenvalues Ek smaller than the Fermi energy EF. Here, denotes the fermionic creation operator and rj the position of site j. As long as the fermions do not completely fill up a lattice band, represents a metallic state.

The distinct ground state properties of bosons and fermions have direct implications for their respective many-body quantum dynamics. For the case of bosons, coherent quench dynamics was experimentally studied by preparing an atomic BEC in a shallow optical lattice and taking it out of equilibrium by a sudden quench to a deep lattice6,7,8. The rapid suppression of tunnelling and the enhanced interactions between the atoms gave rise to characteristic collapses and revivals of the bosonic matter wave interference pattern, whose periodicity is determined by the strength of the on-site interaction UBB. In homogeneous lattice potentials, this phenomenon can be understood from the dynamics of a single lattice site: The time evolution of the many-body state is governed by the operator with being the on-site interaction term of the Bose–Hubbard Hamiltonian, where counts the number of bosons at site j. Consequently, the dynamics of the entire system, , comprises a product of identical dynamics at each lattice site.

In this work, we are concerned with the dynamics of a delocalized many-body state of fermions for which, even in a homogeneous lattice, an effective single-site description is not possible. Specifically, we consider a shallow optical lattice that is simultaneously loaded with a metallic state of spin-polarized fermionic atoms and an atomic BEC, as schematically shown in Fig. 1a. Initially, the interactions between fermions and bosons are weak, while the large kinetic energy dominates. Therefore, we approximate the quantum state of this hybrid Fermi–Bose system by the direct product . When the system is quenched by a rapid increase of lattice depth, tunnelling between lattice sites is suppressed both for fermions and bosons, and interparticle interactions dominate. Interactions among the bosonic component give rise to typical collapse and revival dynamics that has been analysed previously21. It is the key finding of the present work that the fermionic component also undergoes coherent dynamics. Although the fermions do not interact among themselves, their interaction with the bosons drives the dynamics of the quenched metallic state. Similar to the purely bosonic case, the time evolution operator factorizes into with being the on-site interaction term of the Fermi–Bose–Hubbard Hamiltonian22, where counts the number of fermions at site j and UFB is the on-site Fermi–Bose interaction energy. However, due to its delocalized nature, the initial metallic state does not factorize into a product of on-site wavefunctions. This is crucial for coherent fermionic dynamics to occur, the time scale of which is given by h/UBF. We discuss the role of fermionic and bosonic number fluctuations in the quench dynamics and introduce the visibility of the fermionic momentum distribution as a suitable observable. In the experiment, we study the dynamics for various strengths of the Fermi–Bose interaction and reveal their spectral properties through Fourier analyses. As a result of fermionic quantum statistics, the spectra exclusively reveal the Fermi–Bose interaction energy UFB with high resolution. Coherent quench dynamics can therefore be used as a sensitive probe for correlations and complex interaction effects in hybrid many-body quantum systems.

Figure 1: Emergence of coherent quench dynamics in a metallic many-body state.
Figure 1

(a) A Fermi–Bose quantum gas mixture is loaded into a shallow optical lattice. The spin-polarized fermions form a metallic many-body quantum state, delocalized across the lattice (green spheres). The bosons form a BEC (blue background). (b) A rapid increase of lattice depth quenches the system. The on-site interactions between fermions and bosons, UFB, drive coherent dynamics in the fermionic momentum distribution. The origin of the dynamics is illustrated by considering three sample cases in a two-site system. If the system features a localized fermion (left) or bosonic Fock states with an equal number of bosons on each site (middle), no dynamics occurs. Dynamics occurs if the fermion is delocalized, , and the number of bosons is different on each site (right). (c) Fermionic single-particle correlations in a 1D lattice at times t=0, h/(8UFB) and h/(2UFB) after the quench. The fermionic filling is chosen to be and stays constant as a function of time (black point at jl=0).

Results

Quench dynamics in a two-site system

To illustrate the emergence of coherent quench dynamics, we consider an elementary setup with two lattice sites23 (labeled 1 and 2, spaced by distance a), occupied by a single fermion and multiple bosons (see Fig. 1b). For finite tunnelling and vanishing interactions, UFB=0, the fermionic ground state has the form , corresponding to the fermion being in the k=0 quasi-momentum eigenstate. After a quench in which interactions between fermions and bosons are turned on and tunnelling amplitudes for fermions and bosons are set to zero, the site occupations remain constant due to the absence of tunnelling. The off-diagonal correlations of the single-particle density matrix, however, evolve in time: , where n1 (n2) is the number of bosons on site 1 (2). Consequently, the fermionic quasi-momentum distribution, , undergoes dynamics. The evolution for the two allowed quasi-momentum eigenstates k=0 and k=π/a reads (1±cos[UFB(n1n2)t/])/2, and indicates that the fermion oscillates between the k=0 and k=π/a states with a period Th/UFB. In contrast, no dynamics occurs if the fermion initially occupies a localized state, or , as the off-diagonal correlations vanish, or if the number of bosons is identical on both the sites (n1=n2). For n(k) to evolve with time, delocalized fermions and spatially varying bosonic occupancies are required. In the experiment, the latter is provided by the quantum fluctuations of the on-site occupation that are characteristic for a BEC. As this specific example of a two-site model only contains one fermion, quantum statistics does not play a role in the dynamics of n(k). However, quantum statistics plays an essential role in the dynamics of the quasi-momentum distribution when, as in the experiments, many fermions are present.

Fermionic quench dynamics in a lattice system

To characterize the quench dynamics in a setup with many lattice sites, it is convenient to study the visibility of the fermionic quasi-momentum distribution. We define it as the ratio between the number of fermions with quasi-momenta in the interval [−k0, k0] (see Fig. 2a) and the total fermion number N, . For the case of a one-dimensional (1D) lattice and an initial state , the time evolution of the visibility after the quench can be calculated analytically in the thermodynamic limit (see Methods). Assuming k0kF, we obtain

Figure 2: Quench dynamics in the momentum distribution of fermionic 40K atoms.
Figure 2

(a) After variable hold times t, the fermionic momentum distributions are recorded after time-of-flight expansion (inset). Integration along the z-direction results in 1D momentum profiles and averages the effect of Bloch oscillations, which occurs as a consequence of gravity. We show profiles at an interspecies scattering length of aFB=−161.2(1) a0 for t1=120 μs (green) and t2=200 μs (black). Solid lines show a fit of three Gaussians that are separated by the Brillouin zone width 2klat. (b) The residual profile illustrates the redistribution of population within the Brillouin zone. (c) Evolution of the fermionic momentum distribution after the quench. The integrated profiles for each time t, , are normalized to a total area of one. Coherent quench dynamics is visible as a periodic modulation of the peak height at (magnified in the inset).

where kF is the Fermi quasi-momentum, klat=π/a is the quasi-momentum corresponding to the edge of the Brillouin zone and a is the lattice spacing. Analogous to the two-site case, the periodicity of the oscillation is determined by T=h/UFB, and the coherent dynamics originates from the presence of off-diagonal single-particle correlations and on-site occupancy fluctuations of the BEC. Figure 1c illustrates the time evolution of the off-diagonal correlations , where is the fermionic filling. The theoretical analysis can be extended to three-dimensional (3D) lattices, where n(kx, t) is taken to be the projection of the full fermionic quasi-momentum distribution n(kx, ky, kz, t) onto 1D, . The results are qualitatively similar to equation (1) (see Methods).

Experimental sequence and observation of quench dynamics

The experiment begins with the preparation of a quantum degenerate mixture of 2.1(4) × 105 fermionic 40K and 1.7(3) × 105 bosonic 87Rb atoms in their absolute hyperfine ground states |9/2, −9/2〉 and |1, +1〉, respectively. The temperature of the spin-polarized Fermi gas is typically T/TF=0.20(2). Its interaction with the bosons is tuned by means of a Feshbach resonance at 546.75(6) G (ref. 24), addressing interspecies scattering lengths aFB in a range between −161.2(1) a0 and +59(10) a0. Subsequently, a 3D optical lattice operating at a wavelength of λlat=738 nm is adiabatically ramped up within 50 ms to a depth of , where denotes the recoil energy, mF the atomic mass of 40K and klat=2π/λlat (for the corresponding lattice depths for 87Rb, see Methods). For these parameters, the fermions form a metallic many-body state within the first lattice band (see Methods)25 and the bosons form a BEC. Then, we quench the system by rapidly increasing the lattice depth to , suppressing the tunnel coupling between the lattice sites and initiating coherent nonequilibrium dynamics of the Fermi–Bose many-body state. After letting the system evolve for variable hold times t, all trapping potentials are suddenly switched off and an absorption image of the momentum distribution of 40K is recorded after 9 ms time-of-flight expansion (see Fig. 2a, inset).

The dynamics of the fermionic many-body state is revealed via oscillations in the momentum distribution (see Fig. 2). The recorded absorption images are integrated along the direction of gravity to obtain 1D momentum profiles at discrete hold times t, sampled in steps of 40 μs. Figure 2a compares two such profiles that are recorded at the approximate times of a half and a full oscillation cycle for a fixed value of Fermi–Bose interactions. The residual after subtracting the two profiles one from another (see Fig. 2b) illustrates how the interaction-driven dynamics leads to a redistribution of the population from the momenta at the centre to the momenta at the edge of the Brillouin zone. The coherent quench dynamics can be observed as a periodic modulation of the peak height at for hold times shorter than the time scale set by residual tunnelling of the fermions. For longer times, the momentum profiles relax towards a state with a more uniform distribution across the Brillouin zone (Fig. 2c), as a consequence of equilibration due to residual tunnelling (see Methods).

Fermionic visibility

A quantitative understanding of the coherent fermionic dynamics can be gained from the time traces of the visibility . For each momentum profile , the fermionic visibility is calculated after adding the regions with momenta (−klat, −3klat) and (klat, 3klat) to the first Brillouin zone (−klat, klat), as illustrated in Fig. 2a. To obtain the largest amplitude of the visibility oscillations, we choose k0=2klat/3, which is approximately the k-value where the residual profile in Fig. 2b changes sign. Figure 3a shows time traces of the evolution with up to 10 observable oscillation periods. On increasing the attraction between fermions and bosons, the period of the oscillations becomes shorter as expected from the theoretical analysis. This confirms that the quench dynamics is driven by the interspecies interaction UFBaFB. In general, we observe oscillation amplitudes that are significantly smaller than in the case of bosonic collapse and revival dynamics6,8. The reason is that only correlations between fermions on sites with bosons contribute to the dynamics, while unaccompanied fermions form a static background. The Fermi–Bose overlap volume is fundamentally limited because the in-trap size of a Fermi gas is significantly larger than a BEC with comparable atom numbers due to Pauli pressure. In addition, differential gravitational sag can lead to a vertical displacement of the two atom clouds. In our setup, those two effects result in about 5% of the fermions overlapping with bosons. This is compatible with the measured oscillation amplitudes (see Methods). Furthermore, finite temperature and Fermi–Bose interactions in the initial state localize fermions26,27 and reduce the visibility. Finally, residual tunnelling after the quench is expected to induce damping and to reduce the oscillation amplitude28,29.

Figure 3: Coherent quench dynamics of a metallic many-body state.
Figure 3

(a) Time traces of the visibility show the quantum dynamics of fermionic 40K atoms, driven by variable attractive interactions with bosonic 87Rb atoms. Dashed vertical lines indicate the periodicity of the dynamics. The solid lines interpolate the data and serve as a guide to the eye. Each data point corresponds to a single run of the experiment. (b) Fourier analysis reveals the spectral content of the time traces in (a).

Discussion

The spectral content of the fermionic quench dynamics is revealed via Fourier transform of the visibility time traces (see Methods). As shown in Fig. 3b, the spectra are dominated by a single peak, in remarkable contrast to the complex spectra of the bosonic collapse and revival dynamics in the same experimental setting21. Its width of about 300 Hz is compatible with dephasing as a result of both residual tunnelling and a small harmonic anticonfinement (see Methods). The peak also displays a comb-like substructure with several frequencies of order UFB/h. We assign this substructure to the deformation of on-site orbitals as a result of interactions8,27,30 that effectively gives rise to an explicit dependence of the Fermi–Bose interaction energy on the bosonic on-site occupation n, (see Methods). According to equation (1), additional peaks at frequencies 2UFB, 3UFB, … are expected, but not observed in the spectra. As follows from our discussion of the two-site system, such higher frequency components result from correlations between fermions in lattice sites whose occupations differ by two or more bosons. However, due to the different sizes of the fermion and boson clouds, as well as their differential gravitational sag (see Methods, Supplementary Fig. 1 and Supplementary Note 1), such correlations are strongly suppressed in our setup. This results in the suppression of higher harmonics of UFB below the noise level of our spectra.

In Fig. 4, we show the progression of UFB as a function of the interspecies scattering length both for attractive and repulsive Fermi–Bose interactions. We compare the experimental results with the numerical calculations of UFB that use Wannier functions as on-site orbitals. The agreement is remarkable. On the attractive side, the results of the calculations are compatible with the highest frequency components measured experimentally. On the repulsive side, all frequency components measured in the experiments are contained within the bounds of the calculations.

Figure 4: Precision measurement of the Fermi–Bose interaction energy UFB.
Figure 4

For each interspecies scattering length aFB the dominant spectral components (dark points) and the spectral substructure (light points) are shown. Horizontal error bars reflect the experimental uncertainty (s.d.) of the scattering length aFB, vertical error bars are smaller than the size of the data points. The dashed line shows a linear fit C|aFB| to the dominant spectral features, yielding C=36.7(3) Hz/a0. The shaded area shows a numerical calculation assuming the prescription UFB=(2π2aFB/μ)∫dr3|wB(r)|2|wF(r)|2 of a single-band Hubbard model, taking into account the experimental uncertainties in lattice depth and interspecies scattering length aFB. Here, wF(r) and wB(r) denote the fermionic and bosonic Wannier functions, respectively, and μ=mFmB/(mF+mB) is the reduced mass.

In summary, we have observed coherent quench dynamics in metallic states of ultracold fermionic atoms in an optical lattice. In the hybrid Fermi–Bose system investigated here, the time evolution arises from the delocalized character of the initial fermionic state, interspecies interactions and an initial bosonic state that exhibits site-to-site fluctuations of the atom number. Such coherent dynamics also occurs in spin-1/2 interacting fermionic systems31,32 and is expected to emerge in higher-spin fermionic systems33, following a similar quench protocol. The amplitude of the visibility oscillations depends on the single-particle correlations between the lattice sites. Therefore, coherent quench dynamics can serve as a novel tool to probe correlations in delocalized quantum phases of fermionic systems, such as the Hubbard model34 and chains of spin-polarized fermions with intersite interactions35,36. This information is complementary to the site-resolved precision measurements of occupations in quantum gas microscopes37,38. Finally, the spectral analysis of the visibility oscillations enables precision measurements of on-site interactions and may be used to reveal complex interaction effects in hybrid quantum many-body systems.

Methods

Experimental state preparation

Fermi gases of 2.1(4) × 105 40K atoms at a temperature of T/TF=0.20(2) and BECs of 1.7(3) × 105 87Rb atoms were simultaneously created in the hyperfine states |9/2, −9/2〉 and |1, +1〉, respectively. The degenerate Fermi–Bose mixtures were held in a pancake-shaped optical dipole trap operating at λdip=1,030 nm. The interspecies scattering length aFB between fermions and bosons was tuned by means of a Feshbach resonance, located at a magnetic field of 546.75(6) G (ref. 24). The 3D optical lattice (λlat=738 nm) was operated at blue detuning with respect to the relevant atomic transitions of both 40K and 87Rb. It was adiabatically ramped to a depth of for 40K (corresponding to for 87Rb) within 50 ms. The trapping frequencies of the horizontal and vertical confinement (ω, ωz) were 2π × (36,173) Hz for 40K and 2π × (25,94) Hz for 87Rb, respectively. Then, a non-adiabatic jump into a deep lattice, for 40K (corresponding to for 87Rb), was performed within 50 μs, slow enough to avoid population of higher lattice bands, but fast with respect to tunnelling in the first band. Simultaneously with the lattice jump, the harmonic confinement in the horizontal plane was reduced to −2π × 16 Hz for 40K and 2π × 0 Hz for 87Rb, enhancing the coherence time of the quench dynamics8. In the deep lattice, the tunnelling matrix elements for fermions and bosons are JF=2π × 33 Hz and JB=2π × 3 Hz, respectively. The corresponding tunnelling time scales are τF=h/(zJF)=5.1 ms and τB=h/(zJB)=56 ms, where z=6 is the coordination number of a 3D lattice.

For the above loading parameters, the fermions form a metallic state with trap-averaged filling per lattice site of about for vanishing Fermi–Bose interactions (aFB0) and about for attractive Fermi–Bose interactions (aFB−125 a0)21. Accordingly, the fermionic momentum distributions recorded after 9 ms time-of-flight expansion display a partially filled first Brillouin zone (see Fig. 2). The bosons form a BEC with a trap-averaged filling per lattice site of about and a maximal filling in the trap centre of 2.5 atoms.

In-trap arrangement of atomic clouds

For the above loading parameters, the horizontal and vertical in-situ Thomas–Fermi radii (r,rz) are about 50 and 11 μm for 40K and 21 and 5 μm for 87Rb. While the total atom numbers are comparable, the fermionic cloud is about 10 times larger in volume than the bosonic one, as a consequence of Pauli pressure. The differential gravitational sag between the clouds has been measured to be 8(2) μm, leading to a notable displacement (see Supplementary Fig. 1 and Supplementary Note 1). Only the overlap volume of fermions and bosons (plus a thin shell of few lattice sites, which represents the coherence length of the fermions) contributes to the fermionic quench dynamics; about 5% of the fermions overlap with the bosons. This is compatible with the amplitude of the fermionic quench dynamics shown in Fig. 2c, corresponding to about 5% of the atomic density in momentum space.

Spectral analysis

The visibility time traces of the quench dynamics typically cover an observation time of 6 ms, sampled in steps of 40 μs. To obtain high-resolution, low-noise spectra, the time traces are processed as follows: the raw data points are interpolated using cubic splines and the origin of the time axis, t=0, corresponds to the beginning of the jump from VL to VH. To avoid distortion of the spectral analysis due to dynamics that slowly starts during the jump, the first 40 μs of the interpolated trace are removed. For times longer than the observation time, we smoothly attach an exponential decay with a time scale of about 2 ms to the interpolated curve. The such prepared curve is concatenated to its mirror image, which is obtained upon exchanging time t by −t. The resulting trace is again sampled in steps of 40 μs, and numerical Fourier analysis is performed. This processing scheme improves the data quality in two ways: First, the knowledge of the initial phase allows mirroring of the data. This doubles the size of the data set and yields a twofold improvement of the spectral resolution to about 85 Hz. Second, the additional extension of the data set by a smooth exponential decay avoids high frequency artefacts, which would arise from Fourier transform of sharp cutoffs, and makes the Fourier spectra quasi-continuous.

Outline of the calculation

We outline the derivation of equation (1) and discuss its extension to 3D. The Hamiltonian governing the time evolution after the quench is given by

where and being bosonic and fermionic creation operators, respectively, and M is the number of lattice sites.

The explicit action of the time evolution operator on the initial state is (setting =1 for convenience)

We first evaluate the expectation value of the density matrix as a step towards calculating the momentum distribution,

The cases mn and m=n have to be treated separately, yielding

The sum in the brackets in equation (5) cannot be calculated analytically in 3D. This is due to the constraint that the fermions fill up the lowest energy states governed by Ek<EF with Ek=−J[cos(kxa)+cos(kya)+cos(kza)], where J is the hopping. In one dimension, however, the sum is easily carried out. For unconfined bosons, the site occupation |αm|2≡|α|2 is a constant equal to the mean number of bosons per site. We compute the Fourier transform of equation (5) to get the momentum distribution and integrate to obtain the visibility. This gives the expression in equation (1) for the 1D visibility.

In 3D, it is possible to obtain an analytical expression for small fermionic filling, where the Fermi surface is approximately a sphere. The visibility in this case is,

for k0<kF.

Effects of harmonic confinement

We assume that the single-particle ground state of a harmonically trapped system in a lattice can be described by the ground state in the continuum with a lattice renormalized mass39. It is not possible to analytically study a trapped lattice system. We further assume that all the bosons are in the ground state. The average on-site occupancies then take the form , where |α|2 denotes the average occupation in the centre of the trap and is the length scale of the trap. For this case, the visibility (in the limit of low fermionic filling) is given by

where and L is the length of the fermionic system. As the coordinates are rescaled, the integration is carried out over a cube of length one centred at the origin. The amplitude of oscillations in equation (7) is governed by . As |α|2 increases, the amplitude increases for fixed . As increases with α fixed, the bosonic wave function becomes sharply peaked in space, decreasing the overlap between the bosons and the fermions. This in turn decreases the oscillation amplitude. Confinement of the bosons is therefore one reason for the reduced amplitude of oscillations seen in the experimental data.

If we further include a confining trap for the fermions, one can no longer use the plane waves for the initial state. Instead, one must use fermionic harmonic oscillator states. As for the trapped bosons, we carry out calculations in the continuum as the eigenstates of harmonically trapped fermions in a lattice are not known analytically39,40. The masses of the atoms are renormalized masses obtained from the low-density limit in the lattice39,40. We get the following expression for the fermionic visibility:

where are harmonic oscillator wave functions. The sum over l is shorthand for the sum over the set of quantum numbers describing a harmonic oscillator as we fill states. In the thermodynamic limit, as N→∞, the primary contribution to the first term in equation (8) comes from the diagonal part z=z′. In this limit, the integrand is proportional to δ(zz′), but the prefactor has to be determined numerically. With this, we get the compact expression

where ρF is the density of harmonically trapped fermions, given by the Thomas–Fermi formula in the thermodynamic limit. νB,F are the inverse square length scales of the bosonic and fermionic traps, respectively. is calculated numerically from at t=0. The above expression assumes the thermodynamic limit. We have verified that calculations with experimental parameters exhibit negligible finite size effects, and the results agree with equation (9). The non-uniform spatial distribution of fermions contributes to a decrease in the oscillation amplitude. Differing confinement scales for the fermions and bosons affect the spatial overlap between them and additionally reduce the oscillation amplitude. Damping of the oscillations in the experiment is dominantly due to residual tunnelling in the post-quench system31 and interactions between fermions and bosons in the initial state. To emphasize a key point, in all the cases we have considered, the basic time dependence of the visibility oscillations remains the same.

Substructure of spectral features

The comb-like substructure of the peaks in Fig. 3b originates from occupation-dependent interaction strengths , corresponding to the interaction energy of a fermion and a boson on sites that contain one fermion and n bosons21. Combining this modification with equations 5 and 6, the single-particle density matrix contains terms proportional to , where is independent of time. Consequently, the spectrum contains the frequencies for all integer values of ni and nj, that is, spectral features are expected at 0,

Additional information

How to cite this article: Will, S. et al. Observation of coherent quench dynamics in a metallic many-body state of fermionic atoms. Nat. Commun. 6:6009 doi: 10.1038/ncomms7009 (2015).

References

  1. 1.

    et al. Ultracold atomic gases in optical lattices: Mimicking condensed matter physics and beyond. Adv. Phys. 56, 243–379 (2007).

  2. 2.

    , & Many-body physics with ultracold gases. Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 885–964 (2008).

  3. 3.

    , , , & One dimensional bosons: From condensed matter systems to ultracold gases. Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 1405–1466 (2011).

  4. 4.

    , & Thermalization and its mechanism for generic isolated quantum systems. Nature 452, 854–858 (2008).

  5. 5.

    , , & Colloquium: nonequilibrium dynamics of closed interacting quantum systems. Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 863 (2011).

  6. 6.

    , , & Collapse and revival of the matter wave field of a Bose-Einstein condensate. Nature 419, 51–54 (2002).

  7. 7.

    et al. Preparing and probing atomic number states with an atom interferometer. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 200405 (2007).

  8. 8.

    et al. Time-resolved observation of coherent multi-body interactions in quantum phase revivals. Nature 465, 197–201 (2010).

  9. 9.

    et al. Interaction-induced quantum phase revivals and evidence for the transition to the quantum chaotic regime in 1D atomic Bloch oscillations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 193003 (2014).

  10. 10.

    , & A quantum Newton's cradle. Nature 440, 900–903 (2006).

  11. 11.

    et al. Probing the relaxation towards equilibrium in an isolated strongly correlated one-dimensional Bose gas. Nat. Phys. 8, 325–330 (2012).

  12. 12.

    et al. Relaxation and prethermalization in an isolated quantum system. Science 337, 1318–1322 (2012).

  13. 13.

    , , & Energy absorption of a Bose gas in a periodically modulated optical lattice. Phys. Rev. A 73, 041608 (2006).

  14. 14.

    , , , & Spectroscopy of ultracold atoms by periodic lattice modulations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 050402 (2006).

  15. 15.

    & Spectroscopy for cold atom gases in periodically phase-modulated optical lattices. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 205301 (2011).

  16. 16.

    , , & Driven dipole oscillations and the lowest-energy excitations of strongly interacting lattice bosons in a harmonic trap. Phys. Rev. A 89, 033634 (2014).

  17. 17.

    et al. A mixture of Bose and Fermi superfluids. Science 345, 1035 (2014).

  18. 18.

    et al. Fermionic transport and out-of-equilibrium dynamics in a homogeneous Hubbard model with ultracold atoms. Nat. Phys. 8, 213–218 (2012).

  19. 19.

    inStatistical Mechanics: A Set of Lectures 2 edn Westview Press (1998).

  20. 20.

    Mott-Hubbard transition of cold atoms in optical lattices. J. Opt. B 5, S9 (2003).

  21. 21.

    , , , & Coherent interaction of a single fermion with a small bosonic field. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 115305 (2011).

  22. 22.

    , & Mixtures of bosonic and fermionic atoms in optical lattices. Phys. Rev. A 68, 023606 (2003).

  23. 23.

    , & Atomic matter-wave revivals with definite atom number in an optical lattice. Phys. Rev. A 83, 043614 (2011).

  24. 24.

    et al. Near-threshold model for ultracold KRb dimers from interisotope Feshbach spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. A 77, 052705 (2008).

  25. 25.

    et al. Metallic and insulating phases of repulsively interacting fermions in a 3D optical lattice. Science 322, 1520–1525 (2008).

  26. 26.

    , , , & Fermionic atoms in a three dimensional optical lattice: Observing Fermi surfaces, dynamics, and interactions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 080403 (2005).

  27. 27.

    et al. Role of interactions in 87Rb-40K Bose-Fermi mixtures in a 3D optical lattice. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 030408 (2009).

  28. 28.

    & Tunneling-induced damping of phase coherence revivals in deep optical lattices. Phys. Rev. A 78, 061603 (2008).

  29. 29.

    , & Collapse and revival oscillations as a probe for the tunneling amplitude in an ultracold Bose gas. Phys. Rev. A 82, 043601 (2010).

  30. 30.

    , , & Effective three-body interactions of neutral bosons in optical lattices. New J. Phys. 11, 093022 (2009).

  31. 31.

    , , & Coherent quench dynamics in the one-dimensional Fermi-Hubbard model. Phys. Rev. A 90, 031602(R) (2014).

  32. 32.

    , , & Particle-hole pair coherence in Mott insulator quench dynamics. New J. Phys. 16, 103009 (2014).

  33. 33.

    et al. Coherent multi-flavour spin dynamics in a fermionic quantum gas. Nat. Phys. 8, 813–818 (2012).

  34. 34.

    & Interaction quench in the Hubbard model. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 175702 (2008).

  35. 35.

    , , & Strongly correlated fermions after a quantum quench. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 210405 (2007).

  36. 36.

    Quantum quenches and thermalization in one-dimensional fermionic systems. Phys. Rev. A 80, 053607 (2009).

  37. 37.

    , , , & A quantum gas microscope for detecting single atoms in a Hubbard-regime optical lattice. Nature 462, 74 (2009).

  38. 38.

    et al. Single-atom resolved fluorescence imaging of an atomic Mott insulator. Nature 467, 68 (2010).

  39. 39.

    & Confinement control by optical lattices. Phys. Rev. A 70, 043627 (2004).

  40. 40.

    Ultracold Bosonic Atoms in Optical Lattices Ph.D. thesis, Univ. Maryland (2004).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are indebted to Immanuel Bloch for generous support of the experimental efforts and advice during the preparation of the manuscript. We acknowledge Thorsten Best and Simon Braun for experimental assistance, and Ulf Bissbort and David Weiss for critical reading of the manuscript. This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (S.W.), the US Army Research Office with funding from the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (Optical Lattice Emulator program) (S.W.), the Office of Naval Research (D.I. and M.R.), the Graduate School Materials Science in Mainz (S.W.) and the Gutenberg-Akademie (S.W.).

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA

    • Sebastian Will
  2. Institut für Physik, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität, 55099 Mainz, Germany

    • Sebastian Will
  3. Department of Physics, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA

    • Deepak Iyer
    •  & Marcos Rigol

Authors

  1. Search for Sebastian Will in:

  2. Search for Deepak Iyer in:

  3. Search for Marcos Rigol in:

Contributions

S.W. conceived the experiment, carried out the measurements and analysed the data. D.I. and M.R. developed the theoretical model. All authors contributed significantly to the writing of the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sebastian Will.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    Supplementary Figure 1, Supplementary Note 1 and Supplementary References

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms7009

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.