Abstract
The nonlinear interaction of light in an optical fibre can mimic the physics at an event horizon. This analogue arises when a weak probe wave is unable to pass through an intense soliton, despite propagating at a different velocity. To date, these dynamics have been described in the time domain in terms of a solitoninduced refractive index barrier that modifies the velocity of the probe. Here we complete the physical description of fibreoptic event horizons by presenting a full frequencydomain description in terms of cascaded fourwave mixing between discrete singlefrequency fields, and experimentally demonstrate signature frequency shifts using continuous wave lasers. Our description is confirmed by the remarkable agreement with experiments performed in the continuum limit, reached using ultrafast lasers. We anticipate that clarifying the description of fibre event horizons will significantly impact on the description of horizon dynamics and soliton interactions in photonics and other systems.
Introduction
The demonstration that an intense pulse propagating in an optical fibre can give rise to an artificial event horizon^{1} has attracted considerable attention with the possibility to produce laboratory white or blackhole analogues^{1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10}. This picture not only suggests interesting links with general relativity^{1,3,4,8,9}, but the underlying dynamics have also been postulated to influence the formation of optical rogue waves^{7,11,12}, and to allow for the realization of optical functionalities such as the alloptical transistor^{5}.
A fibreoptical analogue of an event horizon occurs when a bright soliton prevents a lowpower probe, travelling at a different velocity, from passing through the soliton. The underlying physics has been described in terms of the intensity dependence of the fibre refractive index (Kerr effect): the soliton creates a moving refractive index perturbation that alters the velocity of the probe wave, preventing its passage through the soliton^{1,8,13}. To the probe, the soliton boundary can thus appear as a horizon, which light can neither enter nor escape, in analogy with behaviour at the boundary of a white or blackhole^{1}. In a dispersive medium, such as an optical fibre, a change in velocity must be associated with a change in frequency, which has been attributed to the conservation of the Doppler shifted probe frequency^{1,8}. This allows signatures of horizon dynamics to be identified in the probe spectrum, where frequency upconversion (blueshift) occurs at a whitehole horizon, and frequency downconversion (redshift) occurs at a blackhole horizon^{1,4,6,9}. Of course, the time and frequencydomain descriptions represent an identical physics; a change in probe velocity can be equally understood to arise from the generation of new frequencies, linking the dynamics of fibre event horizons to the realm of nonlinear optical frequency conversion^{14,15,16}.
Although analogies with event horizons have been suggested only recently, the generation of new frequencies through interactions of temporal solitons and weak linear waves has of course been extensively studied in fibre optics. Initially, these studies focussed on the generation of dispersive waves (DWs) analogous to Cherenkov radiation when solitons alone are launched into the fibre^{17,18,19,20}, but interactions involving an externally injected probe, similar to experiments in ref. 1, have also been studied^{21,22,23}. If the fibre exhibits constant groupvelocity dispersion (GVD), such that light propagation obeys the integrable nonlinear Schrödinger equation (NLSE), these interactions are elastic and display no permanent frequency conversion or horizonlike backscattering effects^{21}. It is only when the GVD varies with wavelength that frequency conversion takes place. This was first predicted theoretically by Yulin et al.^{22,23}, and experimentally observed in the context of fibre supercontinuum generation by Efimov et al.^{24,25} Although recent theoretical work^{6,7,8,26,27} has alluded to the connection between these nonlinear interactions and fibre event horizons, the relationship is yet to be explicitly demonstrated. Moreover, so far all reported studies have focused on ultrashort pulses when considering fibre event horizons. However, the spectrum of a train of such pulses is a frequency comb that consists of discrete spectral components^{28,29}, suggesting that the dynamics must possess an equivalent description that relies solely on the nonlinear mixing of monochromatic continuous waves (CWs)^{30,31}.
In this work, we unveil this description by interpreting the dynamics of fibreoptical event horizons in terms of interactions between a discrete set of monochromatic CWs, and by experimentally demonstrating horizon signatures using only CW lasers. First, we summarize the direct correspondence between fibre horizons and established supercontinuum frequency conversion mechanisms^{16,22,23}, then explain the underlying frequency conversion dynamics in terms of cascaded fourwave mixing (FWM) triggered by a set of CW fields. Our analysis is confirmed by experiments and simulations seeded by both pulsed and CW lasers, over the full range of observable event horizon dynamics. The developed FWMbased description intrinsically allows the underlying energy conservation laws as well as the photon creation and annihilation processes to be identified, which could represent a significant step towards the unambiguous observation of the photonic analogue of Hawking radiation^{13,32,33,34}.
Results
Event horizons in nonlinear fibre optics
We begin by clarifying how the resonant generation of new frequencies through interactions of solitons and weak linear waves^{22,23} describes the very same physics as fibreoptic analogues of the event horizon^{1}. Consider a soliton centred at an optical frequency ω_{s}, propagating in the anomalous dispersion regime, together with a weak probe at frequency ω_{p} in the normal dispersion regime. Owing to their nonlinear interaction, the probe can experience a frequency conversion to an idler ω_{p}→ω_{i}. The idler frequency ω_{i} is set by the resonance condition^{16,22,23,35}
where is the wavenumber of a linear wave at ω in a reference frame moving with the soliton (β_{2} is the GVD coefficient and β_{k} (k=3,4…) are higherorder dispersion coefficients). It is related to the fibre propagation constant β(ω) as , where β_{0}=β(ω_{s}) and . In other words, represents terms beyond the linear in the Taylor series expansion of β(ω) around ω_{s} (refs 14, 15). With the argument , it appears in the generalized NLSE describing the system (see Methods).
We first note that in the degenerate case where ω_{p}=ω_{s}, equation (1) describes the emission of a Cherenkov DW by a soliton^{16,17,20}. In the nondegenerate case, where ω_{p}≠ω_{s}, the nonlinear frequency conversion ω_{p}→ω_{i}, governed by equation (1), manifests itself as an event horizon in the time domain. This is illustrated in Fig. 1a,b. In Fig. 1a, we show a cubic dispersion relation [ with β_{k}=0, k≥4] typical to telecommunications fibres, as well as the corresponding laboratoryframe group velocity , where and υ_{s} is the group velocity of the soliton (highlighted as the horizontal axis). In Fig. 1b, we show an illustrative simulation of the temporal and corresponding spectral evolution of a soliton pump and a weak probe pulse propagating in the fibre (see Methods). Note that we use the standard fibre optics convention that simulations are performed in a reference frame moving with the soliton pump^{14,15}. In this case, negative time values correspond to the leading edge and positive time values to the trailing edge.
We can see from Fig. 1a that any probeidler pair, located between the DW and pump frequencies and connected through the resonance condition in equation (1), will experience group velocities of opposite sign relative to the soliton. This means that, when interacting with the soliton, a probe travelling faster than the soliton (υ_{p}>υ_{s}) will generate an idler travelling slower than the soliton (υ_{i}<υ_{s}), and vice versa. In the time domain reference frame of the soliton, the frequency conversion therefore gives rise to an apparent ‘reflection’ of the probe off the soliton^{5,27,36}, highlighted in Fig. 1b. The probe, travelling faster than the soliton, is seen to bounce off from the soliton at a distance of 25 m in the time domain; or equivalently to generate a frequencyshifted idler that travels slower than the soliton. Indeed, the corresponding spectral evolution of the field clearly demonstrates that the interaction is associated with the frequency conversion ω_{p}→ω_{i}. Interchanging the roles of the probe and the idler simply changes the nature of the event horizon: the frequency that is groupvelocity matched to the soliton represents the transition point between white and blackhole horizons. The impenetrability of the soliton (event horizon) and the nonlinear fibreoptic frequency conversion, therefore, describe the very same physics; the former describes a change in probe velocity whose signature is a frequency translation, whereas the latter describes a frequency translation whose signature is a change in velocity.
FWM interpretation
The above discussion highlights the equivalence of soliton interactions in nonlinear fibre optics^{16,22,23} and fibreoptical analogues of event horizons^{1}. However, neither of these descriptions provide information on the discrete nonlinear optical wave mixing mechanisms or energy conservation laws that drive the conversion of photons from the probe to the idler. We now address this gap by describing the frequency translation dynamics in terms of singlefrequency electromagnetic fields. For this purpose, we consider two CW pumps at ω_{±}, with mean frequency ω_{s} and separation Δ such that ω_{±}=ω_{s}±Δ/2, copropagating with a weak probe at ω_{p}. FWM between the three CW modes leads to the generation of a frequency comb with equidistant frequency components (Fig. 1d). It has been shown^{37} that in the presence of higherorder dispersion, this cascade can be phasematched such that a single higherorder idler mode at ω_{i}=ω_{p}+nΔ (n=±1, ±2…) is resonantly amplified. Here the positive and negative integers represent conversion from a lowfrequency probe to a highfrequency idler and vice versa. We note that the intermediate frequency components (between ω_{p} and ω_{i}) are not amplified, but instead simply serve to transfer energy to the resonant idler. In quantummechanical terms, the FWM cascade mimics a phasematched higherorder nonlinear process in which n pump photons at ω_{±} and a single probe photon ω_{p} are annihilated, whereas n photons at ω_{±} and a single idler photon ω_{i} are created^{30,37}, as shown in Fig. 1c. Assuming the CW pumps ω_{±} to possess equal powers, the phasematching condition leading to the amplification of the nth order idler is given by^{37}
Under typical conditions, the pump detuning Δ is small, so that (see for example, Fig. 1a). In this case, the phasematching condition is independent of the CW pump separation Δ, and equation (2) reduces to the resonance condition describing event horizon dynamics, given in equation (1). Therefore, all CW pairs ω_{±}, regardless of their detuning Δ, act to translate the frequency of the probe to the same idler frequency as illustrated in Fig. 1d. A smaller pump detuning leads to an increased number of intermediate steps in the cascade, however, the phasematched idler frequency remains the same. The continuum limit converges to the soliton interaction described above^{30}, and the formation of a fibreoptical event horizon now lends itself to an interpretation in terms of monochromatic CW fields: soliton modes, symmetrically distributed about the pump centre frequency, all drive the resonant amplification of the idler mode, which has a group velocity of opposite sign to the probe mode (in the reference frame of the soliton). Recalling that the FWM cascade also leads to an exchange of energy between the pump modes (see Fig. 1c), this discrete description also reveals the energy conservation mechanism underlying the spectral recoil experienced by solitons during horizon reflections^{5,7,26,27}, which is also visible in Fig. 1b.
Experiments
We now verify the above analysis by comparing the results of two sets of experiments. In the first experiment, we launch a temporal soliton into a segment of dispersionshifted fibre (DSF) to create an artificial event horizon for a weak, frequencytunable CW probe. In the second experiment, we replace the soliton by two quasiCW pumps, designed to mimic two spectral modes of the soliton. These experiments allow us to directly compare the frequency translation signatures of artificial event horizons, and the dynamics of cascaded FWM.
Figure 2 shows our experimental setup (see also Methods). An amplified modelocked laser diode serves as the source of picosecond solitons. The discrete CW pumps are derived from two frequencytunable external cavity lasers (ECLs), which are amplitude modulated to produce flattop nanosecond pulses. Sufficient quasiCW power is obtained by a twostage amplification scheme, with narrow bandpass filters used to remove amplified spontaneous emission. Depending on the experimental configuration, the soliton or quasiCW pumps are combined with a weak CW probe derived from a third ECL. The combined field is then launched into 100 m of DSF, and the spectrum is measured at the fibre output using an optical spectrum analyser.
Comparison of results
Figure 3a superimposes output spectra for both pump configurations (dualCW and soliton pulse) in the absence of the probe wave. The soliton emits a DW centred at 1,500 nm, which is closely matched by the cascaded FWM components generated by the CW pumps^{30}. When the weak probe at 1,539 nm is also injected into the fibre, an idler component, blueshifted relative to the probe, appears at 1,515 nm, shown in Fig. 3b. This is the frequencydomain signature of a fibreoptic whitehole horizon^{1}. In the time domain, the probe is travelling faster than the soliton, leading to the generation of an idler, which travels slower than the soliton (see Fig. 1a). The generation of the idler is observed for both pumping configurations, with the continuous soliton spectrum closely following the frequency comb generated by the CW pumps. Indeed, the agreement between the two experiments is remarkable.
We emphasize that the processes generating the DW and the idler are completely independent, which is highlighted in Fig. 3c. Here we show three different output spectra for varying probe wavelengths. The amplified idler mode changes as the probe is varied, in agreement with equation (2), but the frequency components corresponding to the DW remain unaffected. In Fig. 4, we experimentally demonstrate the insensitivity of the phasematched idler frequency to the pump detuning Δ (shown schematically in Fig. 1d). Here we have selected comparatively large detunings for which the bracketed term in equation (2) may not completely vanish. Despite choosing low cascade orders n (n∝1/Δ), the wavelengths of the phasematched idler components differ by less than a nanometre, and agree well with the computed ‘event horizon’ limit from equation (1). Our experiments thus confirm the predicted frequency invariance of the amplified idler, and agree well with the trend expected for the limit Δ→0.
Full event horizon dynamics
To unambiguously establish the validity of our FWM description, we have used both pumping configurations to explore the dynamics over the full range of probe frequencies that display event horizon signatures. The density maps in Fig. 5a,b show a sequence of experimental spectra corresponding to pulsed and CW pumping. In both pumping regimes, the probe is varied between the boundary limits set by the pump and the DW wavelengths. We first note that the DW component remains entirely unaffected as the probe wavelength is scanned, further confirming its independence from the event horizon process. Second, in both experiments, the probe–idler pairs paint an apparent Xshaped feature as the probe frequency is varied, owing to the interchangeability of the probe and the idler. The two intersect at 1,526 nm, which corresponds to the wavelength that is group velocity matched with the pump. When the probe is tuned through this point, the dynamics are reversed, as the group velocitymatched point represents the transition point between a white and blackhole horizon. The agreement between the temporal soliton and discrete CW experiments is remarkable, which acts as a clear demonstration of their correspondence. For each probe wavelength, we have also calculated the idler wavelength as predicted theoretically by the resonance condition given by equation (1), and observe near perfect agreement. Finally, we have also performed full numerical modelling of these experiments (see Methods), shown in Fig. 5c,d, and the simulation results can be seen to be in excellent agreement with the experiments. Small discrepancies are attributed to imperfect knowledge of fibre parameters, and to residual amplified spontaneous emission seen on the rededge of the soliton experiments. Numerical simulations further confirm that no frequency translation takes place for probe frequencies larger than the DW limit, in line with the phasematching conditions (see also Fig. 1a).
Discussion
The realization that photonic systems can be harnessed to experimentally probe the physics at an event horizon has given rise to a vibrant field of research^{8}. Indeed, although the initial observations were made in the context of light propagation in optical fibre^{1}, similar ideas have subsequently been explored also in other optical systems^{3,9}. Of course, analogies should always be applied with care, as perturbative physical effects present in one system may not always possess a clear counterpart in the other. Polarization fluctuations, fibre inhomogeneities and nonlocal nonlinearities, although all playing minimal role in our experiments, are nevertheless examples of effects that may impact the accuracy of the underlying analogy. Higherorder dispersion is a case in point, as it is only when the GVD varies with wavelength that the frequency conversion process underpinning fibreoptic event horizons manifests itself^{16,21,22,23,37}. Despite their possible imperfections, however, analogies remain extremely powerful and important tools in facilitating the transfer of knowledge across different branches of physics^{8,38,39}.
In this paper, we have focussed on describing the nonlinear optics that underlie the fibre event horizons proposed in ref. 1. First, we have clarified how frequency conversion mechanisms extensively studied in the context of ultrafast nonlinear fibre optics describe the very same physics as fibre event horizons. In particular, the nonlinear interaction of a weak probe with an intense soliton results in generation of a frequencyshifted idler, whose group velocity relative to the soliton is opposite to that of the probe’s. We have then demonstrated how this mechanism can be completely described within the discrete wave mixing framework of traditional nonlinear optics. Specifically, the cascaded FWM of two strong CW modes and a weak probe results in the resonant amplification of a higherorder idler, whose group velocity relative to the soliton is opposite to that of the probe’s. In the continuum limit, where the frequency spacing of the CW pumps approaches zero, the phasematching condition governing the FWM interactions reduces to the resonance condition governing the soliton dynamics, illustrating the correspondence of the two phenomena. Extensive experiments designed to compare spectral signatures of horizon dynamics at all possible probe wavelengths, induced by both a temporal soliton and by a pair of quasiCW pumps, confirm our analysis.
Our work establishes a link between artificial event horizons, ultrafast nonlinear fibreoptics and FWM of monochromatic CWs, and we believe that our results will permit valuable flow of knowledge, ideas and insights across all of these fields. In particular, because our FWM description allows for the photon creation and annihilation processes to be identified, our results could represent a significant step towards the unambiguous observation of fibreoptic photon pair creation analogous to the elusive Hawking radiation^{13,32,33,34}.
Methods
Experimental setup
The CW pumps are derived from two tunable fibrecoupled ECLs with wavelengths set in the telecommunications Lband (centre wavelength λ_{s}=1,580.46 nm). They are combined using a 50:50 fibre coupler, before being passed through an amplitude modulator to produce 1 ns flattop pulses with a 100:1 duty cycle. The output is preamplified by a lownoise Lband erbiumdoped fibre amplifier, before being split with a second 50:50 fibre coupler, and amplified by two separate highpower Lband EDFAs in order to avoid unwanted wave mixing between the two pumps. The pumps are spectrally filtered before and after the highpower amplification stage by 0.4 nm tunable bandpass filters in order to remove unwanted amplified spontaneous emission. The two pumps are recombined with a final 50:50 fibre coupler, resulting in two 1 ns flattop, quasiCW pulses with a peak power of 5 W each. The extra port of the last coupler is used to monitor the pump power, and ensure the pulses are temporally synchronized. The CW pumps and a 20mW continuouswave signal, derived from a third ECL, are combined using a wavelengthdivision multiplexer (WDM). Polarization controllers before the WDM ensure both the pumps and signal are copolarized. The combined field is then launched into 100 m of DSF (Corning). The output of the fibre is attenuated using a variable optical attenuator before being recorded by an optical spectrum analyser (Ando AQ6315A). Note that we have carefully verified stimulated Brillouin scattering (SBS) to be negligible in our experiments by measuring the backwards propagating power at the fibre input. This may seem surprising given the comparatively large quasiCW peak power, but we can readily identify two mechanisms that effectively suppress SBS: (i) the 500 MHz bandwidth of the quasiCW pumps is much larger than the Brillouin linewidth (50 MHz), which significantly increases the SBS threshold^{14}, and (ii) the FWM beating of the two pumps quickly redistributes the spectral energy to multiple modes so that no single mode exceeds the SBS threshold.
For the temporal soliton experiment, the dualCW pump is replaced with a 10GHz modelocked laser diode (Alnair MLLD100) producing 1 ps pulses, set to the same centre wavelength as the CW pumps. The pulses are again amplified in two stages, with a single filter between the two amplifiers. An attenuator before the WDM allows us to control the peak power of the solitons. The peak power of the pulses launched into the fibre is 17.2 W.
Numerical simulations
Our experimental observations are modelled by simulations based on the generalized NLSE^{15}
where A(z,t) is the envelope of the electric field, β_{k} are the dispersion coefficients, γ is the nonlinear interaction coefficient of the fibre and R(t)=(1−f_{R})δ(t)+f_{R}h_{R}(t) is the response function containing the instantaneous and delayed Raman contributions to the nonlinearity. Note that the first term on the righthand side of equation (3) is equal to , where is the wavenumber defined in the main text. The Raman response function h_{R}(t) is experimentally measured^{40}, and f_{R}=0.18 is the fractional Raman contribution to the nonlinearity. The NLSE is solved numerically using the splitstep Fourier method^{14}, where linear and nonlinear effects are modelled separately in the frequency and in the timedomain, respectively. Although the nonlinear step is propagated in the timedomain, the convolution between the field intensity and the nonlinear response is evaluated in the frequency domain using the convolution Fourier theorem^{41,42}. Finally, we note that our simulations do not include SBS, and its negligible role is thus further confirmed by the excellent agreement between the numerical and experimental results.
In Fig. 1b, we show an illustrative simulation of the temporal and spectral evolution of a soliton pump and a weak probe pulse propagating in 50 m of optical fibre. The parameters used in this illustrative simulation are chosen to clearly show the frequency translation ω_{p}→ω_{i}, and do not match experimental parameters. The simulation uses dispersion coefficients β_{2}=−4.4 ps^{2} km^{−1} and β_{3}=+0.13 ps^{3} km^{−1} at the pump, and an estimated nonlinear interaction coefficient γ=2.5 W^{−1} km^{−1}. Raman scattering was neglected in this simulation. The soliton pump is centred at 1,600 nm, with peak power P_{s}=245 W and pulse width τ_{s}=85 fs, whereas the probe is centred at 1,522 nm and has peak power P_{p}=5 W and pulse width τ_{p}=300 fs. The probe trails the pump temporally by 1.1 ps at the input of the fibre.
For the simulations shown in Fig. 5c,d, we use fibre dispersion coefficients β_{2}=−2.6 ps^{2} km^{−1}, β_{3}=+0.13 ps^{3} km^{−1} and β_{4}=−7 × 10^{−4} ps^{4} km^{−1} at the pump centre wavelength, and nonlinear coefficient γ=2.5 W^{−1} km^{−1}. These simulations also included stimulated Raman scattering for completeness, but its effect was found to play a negligible role in the dynamics in our parameter regime. For all simulations, we have also checked that the impact of selfsteepening is negligible. The optical power and wavelengths of the pump and signal waves are the same as those measured in experiments. The temporal width of the soliton pump is τ=1.5 ps, estimated from a secondharmonic frequencyresolved optical gating (Southern Photonics SH150) measurement.
Additional information
How to cite this article: Webb, K. E. et al. Nonlinear optics of fibre event horizons. Nat. Commun. 5:4969 doi: 10.1038/ncomms5969 (2014).
References
Philbin, T. G. et al. Fiberoptical analog of the event horizon. Science 319, 1367–1370 (2008).
Hill, S., Kuklewicz, C. E., Leonhardt, U. & König, F. Evolution of light trapped by a soliton in a microstructured fiber. Opt. Express 17, 13588–13601 (2009).
Faccio, D. et al. Analogue gravity and ultrashort laser pulse filamentation. Europhys. Lett. 89, 34004 (2010).
Robertson, S. & Leonhardt, U. Frequency shifting at fiberoptical event horizons: the effect of Raman deceleration. Phys. Rev. A 81, 063835 (2010).
Demircan, A., Amiranashvili, Sh. & Steinmeyer, G. Controlling light by light with an optical event horizon. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 163901 (2011).
Choudhary, A. & König, F. Efficient frequency shifting of dispersive waves at solitons. Opt. Express 20, 5538–5546 (2012).
Demircan, A. et al. Rogue events in the group velocity horizon. Sci. Rep. 2, 850 (2012).
Faccio, D. Laser pulse analogues for gravity and analogue Hawking radiation. Contemp. Phys. 53, 97–112 (2012).
Faccio, D., Arane, T., Lamperti, M. & Leonhardt, U. Optical black hole lasers. Class. Quantum Grav. 29, 224009 (2012).
Tartara, L. Frequency shifting of femtosecond pulses by reflection at solitons. IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 48, 1439–1442 (2012).
Solli, D. R., Ropers, C., Koonath, P. & Jalali, B. Optical rogue waves. Nature 450, 1054–1057 (2007).
Demircan, A. et al. Rogue wave formation by accelerated solitons at an optical event horizon. Appl. Phys. B 115, 343–354 (2014).
Belgiorno, F. et al. Hawking radiation from ultrashort laser pulse filaments. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 203901 (2010).
Agrawal, G. P. Nonlinear Fiber Optics. 5th edn Academic Press (2012).
Dudley, J. M., Genty, G. & Coen, S. Supercontinuum generation in photonic crystal fiber. Rev. Mod. Phys. 78, 1135–1184 (2006).
Skryabin, D. V. & Gorbach, A. V. Colloquium: looking at a soliton through the prism of optical supercontinuum. Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1287–1299 (2010).
Wai, P. K. A., Menyuk, C. R., Lee, Y. C. & Chen, H. H. Nonlinear pulse propagation in the neighborhood of the zerodispersion wavelength of monomode optical fibers. Opt. Lett. 11, 464–466 (1986).
Wai, P. K. A., Chen, H. H. & Lee, Y. C. Radiations by ‘solitons’ at the zero groupdispersion wavelength of singlemode optical fibers. Phys. Rev. A 41, 426–439 (1990).
Elgin, J. N. Soliton propagation in an optical fiber with thirdorder dispersion. Opt. Lett. 17, 1409–1410 (1992).
Akhmediev, N. & Karlsson, M. Cherenkov radiation emitted by solitons in optical fibers. Phys. Rev. A 51, 2602–2607 (1995).
Gordon, J. P. Dispersive perturbations of solitons of the nonlinear Schrödinger equation. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 9, 91–97 (1992).
Yulin, A. V., Skryabin, D. V. & Russell, P. J. Fourwave mixing of linear waves and solitons in fibers with higherorder dispersion. Opt. Lett. 29, 2411–2413 (2004).
Skryabin, D. V. & Yulin, A. V. Theory of generation of new frequencies by mixing of solitons and dispersive waves in optical fibers. Phys. Rev. E 72, 016619 (2005).
Efimov, A. et al. Timespectrallyresolved ultrafast nonlinear dynamics in smallcore photonic crystal fibers: experiment and modelling. Opt. Express 12, 6498–6507 (2004).
Efimov, A. et al. Interaction of an optical soliton with a dispersive wave. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 213902 (2005).
Driben, R., Yulin, A. V., Efimov, A. & Malomed, B. A. Trapping of light in solitonic cavities and its role in the supercontinuum generation. Opt. Express 21, 19091–19096 (2013).
Yulin, A. V., Driben, R., Malomed, B. A. & Skryabin, D. V. Soliton interaction mediated by cascaded four wave mixing with dispersive waves. Opt. Express 21, 14481–14486 (2013).
Eckstein, J. N., Ferguson, A. I. & Hänsch, T. W. Highresolution twophoton spectroscopy with picosecond light pulses. Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 847–850 (1978).
Udem, Th., Holzwarth, R. & Hänsch, T. W. Optical frequency metrology. Nature 416, 233–237 (2002).
Erkintalo, M., Xu, Y. Q., Murdoch, S. G., Dudley, J. M. & Genty, G. Cascaded phase matching and nonlinear symmetry breaking in fiber frequency combs. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 223904 (2012).
Boyd, R. W. Nonlinear Optics 3rd edn Academic Press (2008).
Barceló, C., Liberati, S. & Visser, M. Analogue gravity. Living Rev. Relativity 14, 3 (2011).
Petev, M. et al. Blackbody emission from light interacting with an effective moving dispersive medium. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 043902 (2013).
Unruh, W. G. Has Hawking radiation been measured? Found. Phys. 44, 532–545 (2014).
Chapman, B. H., Travers, J. C., Popov, S. V., Mussot, A. & Kudlinski, A. Long wavelength extension of CWpumped supercontinuum through solitondispersive wave interactions. Opt. Express 18, 24729–24734 (2010).
Rubino, E. et al. Solitoninduced relativisticscattering and amplification. Sci. Rep 2, 932 (2012).
Xu, Y. Q., Erkintalo, M., Genty, G. & Murdoch, S. G. Cascaded Bragg scattering in fiber optics. Opt. Lett. 38, 142–144 (2013).
Kibble, T. & Srivastava, A. Condensed matter analogues of cosmology. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 25, 400301 (2013).
The power of analogies. Nat. Photon. 8, 1 (2014).
Stolen, R. H., Gordon, J. P., Tomlinson, W. J. & Haus, H. A. Raman response function of silicacore fibers. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 6, 1159–1166 (1989).
Dudley, J. M. & Taylor, J. R. Supercontinuum Generation in Optical Fibers 1st edn Cambridge University Press (2010).
Cristiani, I., Tediosi, R., Tartara, L. & Degiorgio, V. Dispersive wave generation by solitons in microstructured optical fibers. Opt. Express 12, 124–135 (2004).
Acknowledgements
M.E., N.G.R.B. and S.G.M. acknowledge support from the Marsden Fund of the Royal Society of New Zealand. M.E. further acknowledges support from the University of Auckland Faculty Research Development Fund (FRDF). J.M.D. acknowledges support from the European Research Council (ERC) Advanced Grant ERC2011AdG290562 MULTIWAVE. G.G. acknowledges support from the Academy of Finland (projects 130099 and 132279).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
K.E.W. performed all experiments and numerical simulations; Y.X. developed the initial experimental setup; M.E. and G.G. developed the concept and the theory of the frequency domain description of horizon dynamics. N.G.R.B. and J.M.D. contributed to clarifying the solitonhorizon dynamics concepts; S.G.M. designed the experiment, and together with M.E. supervised the work and obtained financial support. All authors contributed to analysing results, writing and commenting on the manuscript and discussing the results and interpretation.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Webb, K., Erkintalo, M., Xu, Y. et al. Nonlinear optics of fibre event horizons. Nat Commun 5, 4969 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms5969
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms5969
This article is cited by

Soliton linearwave scattering in a Kerr microresonator
Communications Physics (2022)

Datadriven model discovery of ideal fourwave mixing in nonlinear fibre optics
Scientific Reports (2022)

Intracavity incoherent supercontinuum dynamics and rogue waves in a broadband dissipative soliton laser
Nature Communications (2021)

Alloptical supercontinuum switching
Communications Physics (2020)

Customizing supercontinuum generation via onchip adaptive temporal pulsesplitting
Nature Communications (2018)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.