Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Carbon monoxide inhibits inward rectifier potassium channels in cardiomyocytes


Reperfusion-induced ventricular fibrillation (VF) severely threatens the lives of post-myocardial infarction patients. Carbon monoxide (CO)—produced by haem oxygenase in cardiomyocytes—has been reported to prevent VF through an unknown mechanism of action. Here, we report that CO prolongs action potential duration (APD) by inhibiting a subset of inward-rectifying potassium (Kir) channels. We show that CO blocks Kir2.2 and Kir2.3 but not Kir2.1 channels in both cardiomyocytes and HEK-293 cells transfected with Kir. CO directly inhibits Kir2.3 by interfering with its interaction with the second messenger phosphatidylinositol (4,5)-bisphosphate (PIP2). As the inhibition of Kir2.2 and Kir2.3 by CO prolongs APD in myocytes, cardiac Kir2.2 and Kir2.3 are promising targets for the prevention of reperfusion-induced VF.


The reperfusion of myocardium subjected to a transient period of ischaemia rapidly induces severe ventricular arrhythmias1. Most cases of sudden cardiac death may result from reperfusion-induced ventricular fibrillation (VF)2. Such arrhythmias occur under a number of pathological and clinical circumstances3,4,5, and as such have stimulated a great deal of interest in the development of pharmacological agents to control reperfusion-induced VF.

Haem oxygenase (Hmox) is the rate-limiting enzyme responsible for the degradation of haem in the endoplasmic reticulum to generate equimolar amount of biliverdin, free iron and carbon monoxide (CO)6. Myocardial expression of Hmox1 is upregulated in a rat experimental myocardial infarction model7. In mice lacking Hmox1 undergoing ischaemic/reperfusion, all the hearts examined exhibited VF8. The mechanism of ischaemia/reperfusion-induced VF involves the downregulation of Hmox1 mRNA and a reduction in Hmox activity9, however, the mechanism by which CO may act to prevent this remains unknown.

CO is a promising molecule with therapeutic potential in a number of disorders due to its cytoprotective and homoeostatic properties10,11,12. The majority of endogenous CO is produced in a reaction catalysed by the enzyme Hmoxs6. CO is a potent vasodilator13 and offers cardiac protection in myocardial ischaemia-reperfusion injury9. Here we investigated the effect of CO on ion channels, which contribute to action potential (AP) and identified a new subfamily of ion-channel targets for CO.


CO prolonged ventricle AP duration by inhibiting Kir channels

CORM-2 (tricarbonyldichlororuthenium (II) dimer [Ru(CO3)Cl2]2, CO-releasing molecule) at the concentration of 10 μM and 1 μM significantly prolonged mean APD90 (action potential duration at 90% repolarization) of rat ventricular myocytes by 68.7±4.54% (P<0.001, n=5) and 35.6±3.24% (P<0.001, n=5), respectively (Fig. 1a).

Figure 1: CO prolonged APD of rat ventricular myocytes.

(a,b) CORM-2 (10 μM and 1 μM) prolonged APD90 of rat ventricles by 68.7±4.54% (n=5) and 35.6±3.24% (n=5), respectively. **P<0.001 versus control. (c,d) CORM-2 (10 μM) prolonged the APD50 and APD90 in the presence of 20 μM ranolazine (Rano) by 5.9±3.82% (n=6) and 37.0±7.38% (n=6), respectively. **P<0.001 versus Rano group.

CO chiefly extended the third period of repolarization. The possible candidate ion channels contribute to this prolonged AP include inward rectified K+ currents (Kir2.0) and the sustained (late) component of the inward Na+ current (late INa) (Nav1.5)14. Ranolazine (Rano) is a common blocker for Nav1.5 (ref. 15). It tonic blocks the late INa with IC50 of 5.6 μM, which are about 30–38-fold lower than required to cause tonic inhibition of peak INa15,16,17. Application of ranolazine (20 μM) significantly reduced APD (Fig. 1b), suggesting the involvement of Nav1.5 in the repolarization phase of AP. However, CORM-2 (10 μM) prolonged the APD in the presence of ranolazine (20 μM) by 37.0±7.38% (P<0.001, n=6) (Fig. 1b), indicating that CO exerts its inhibitory effect partly through Kir2.0 channel. Additionally, the effect of ranolazine on CORM-2-induced prolongation of APD at the concentration of 80 μM was similar to its effect with 20 μM, suggesting that Rano at 20 μM was sufficient to completely block late INa (Supplementary Fig. 1). This is consistent to the previous report14. According to our results, the ratio, which represents the contribution of Nav1.5 and Kir in the prolonged APs is approximately 3:4.

To confirm whether CO could regulate the function of Kir2.0 channels, whole-cell patch-clamp was thereafter used to record the ionic currents of rat myocytes. The current–voltage (I–V) relationship of IKir was recorded with ramp-like repolarizations in the presence and absence of CORM-2. The membrane was clamped to 0 mV for 50 ms and then repolarized from +40 to −140 mV at a rate of −100 mV s−1 repeated once every second. For IKir recordings, Na+ current was inactivated by holding at 0 mV and Ca2+ current was inhibited by the addition of 10 mM nitrendipine to the bath. Strikingly, CORM-2 at the concentration of 10 μM markedly blocked IKir by 34.43±4.27% at a holding potential of −120 mV (P<0.001, n=5) (Fig. 2a). To further exclude other possible candidate ion channels in addition to Kir2.0 which is sensitive to Ba2+ (1 mM), CORM-2 was applied in the presence of Ba2+. The fact that CO could not further extend the inhibition of Ba2+ confirmed that CO-target ion channels are Ba2+-sensitive Kir2.0 (Fig. 2b).

Figure 2: CO inhibited rat myocardial IKir.

(a,b) CORM-2 (10 μM) inhibited rat myocardial IKir by 34.43±4.27% at a holding potential of −120 mV (n=5).**P<0.001 versus control. (c,d) CORM-2 (10 μM) further inhibited IKir by 2.23±5.59% in the presence of Ba2+ at a holding potential of −120 mV (n=5). P>0.05 between compared groups.

CO blocked Kir2.2 and Kir2.3 but not Kir2.1 channels

Human Kir2.2, Kir2.3 and Kir2.1 (KCNJ12, KCNJ4 and KCNJ2) which constitute human myocardial IKir were individually expressed in HEK-293 cells to further clarify the effect of CO on Kir2.0. Barium chloride (BaCl2), the specific inhibitor of Kir2.0 channels, was utilized to identify them. Results showed that CO remarkably inhibited the human Kir2.2 and Kir2.3 channels but not the Kir2.1 channel (Fig. 3a–c). The efficiency of CO on blocking Kir2.2 and Kir2.3 was determined by measuring the dose response of channel inhibition (Fig. 3d). Curve was plotted by the current size at −120 mV against the relative dosages and it was then fitted with non-linear Hill regression. The half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) of CORM-2 for Kir2.2 is 22.16 μM and the maximal inhibition was about 56.43±3.95% by 100 μM CORM-2. Meanwhile, the half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) of CORM-2 for Kir2.3 is 6.44 μM and the maximal inhibition was about 74.86±2.55% by 100 μM CORM-2.

Figure 3: CO specifically blocked Kir2.2 and Kir2.3 but not Kir2.1 channel expressed in HEK-293 cells.

The inhibitory effect of CORM-2 at different concentrations on (a) Kir2.1, (b) Kir2.2 and (c) Kir2.3 currents. (d) Concentration-dependent inhibition by CORM-2 on Kir2.0 activity. Dosage curve was fitted with non-linear Hill. IC50=22.16, Hill coefficient is 0.992 (Kir2.2). IC50=6.44 μM, Hill coefficient is 0.995 (Kir2.3). **P<0.001, *P<0.01 versus control, n=5 each point.

CO decreased the open probability of Kir2.3 channels

To gain insight into the mechanism on how CO affecting the Kir2.3 channel, we tested the effect of CO on properties of single Kir2.3 channel expressed in HEK-293 cells. A single-channel current was recorded with a pipette voltage of 70 mV using the excised inside-out configuration and was then identified by its unitary conductance (13~14.2 pS) and pharmacological sensitivity. Application of 100 μM CORM-2 to the bath solution (intracellular side) inhibited the NPo of the Kir2.3 channel by 42.84±3.00% (P<0.001, n=5) (Fig. 4a). No change of unitary conductance was observed. Common antagonists of Kir2.3 including BaCl2 (1 mM) and genistein (100 μM) (a Kir2.3 channel-specific inhibitor18) were also employed to compare the effect of CO on NPo of Kir2.3 (Fig. 4b). Our results showed a similar inhibitory effect on Kir2.3 for both CO and genistein. In addition, the time course of the CO inhibitory effect at a holding voltage of 70 mV was analysed (Fig. 4c). An example of long trace of single channels was shown as Supplementary Fig. 2. CORM-2 at the concentration of 100 μM gradually decreased the NPo of Kir2.3 and this inhibition reached its maximum inhibition within 1 min. This inhibition outlasted the period of application and the NPo of Kir2.3 slowly recovered after washing out CO, suggesting a reversible and stable interaction between CO and the Kir2.3 channel. A similar inhibitory effect by genistein was observed. In contrast, BaCl2 immediately decreased the NPo of Kir2.3 and exerted stronger inhibition. As membrane patches containing the channels are physically isolated from the rest of the cell in the inside-out configuration, cytoplasmic factors are largely absent. This indicates that CO directly inhibits the Kir2.3 channel current independent of the intracellular signal pathway.

Figure 4: CO directly decreased the open probability (NPo) of Kir2.3 channel.

(a,b) The dotted lines labelled with ‘O’ and ‘C’ indicate the opened and closed state of Kir2.3 currents, respectively. (b) BaCl2 (1 mM), genistein (100 μM) and CORM-2 (100 μM) decreased the NPo of Kir2.3 currents (at Vholding +70 mV) by 97.68±2.01%, n=4, 46.37±3.40%, n=5, 42.84±3.00%, n=5, respectively. After washing out the drugs, Kir2.3 current recovered entirely. **P<0.001 versus control. (c) Time course of CORM-2 (100 μM) action on Kir2.3 currents. Averaged NPo plot (5 s bins) from five repeated perfusions of indicated compounds were normalized to control.

CO regulated Kir2.3 by interfering its interaction with PIP2

A common feature of Kir2.0 channels is that they all require membrane phospholipid phosphatidylinositol (4,5)-bisphosphate (PIP2) to maintain their activity19,20,21. The affinity of PIP2 and Kir2.0 determines the sensitivity of Kir2.0 to many regulatory factors like pH, protein kinase C and membrane receptors such as type 1 muscarinic receptors (M1) and epidermal growth factor receptors21. Kir2.3 having a weak affinity with PIP2 is sensitive to these regulators, whereas Kir2.1 possessing a strong affinity with PIP2 is not sensitive to them. As described above, CO regulated Kir2.2 and Kir2.3 but not Kir2.1. We then asked whether the distinct effect of CO on Kir2.3 and Kir2.1 follows the same pattern and is partially due to PIP2. To test this hypothesis, we studied the effects of CO on Kir2.3 (T53I, I213L) and Kir2.1 (I79T, L222I) channel (Fig. 5a,b). Kir2.3 (T53I, I213L) is a mutant of Kir2.3 that has a stronger affinity with PIP2 and behaves more like Kir2.1 regarding to its responses to inhibitory modulations21,22,23. Kir2.1 (I79T, L222I) is a mutant of Kir2.1, which has a weaker affinity with PIP2 and behaves more like Kir2.3 (refs 22, 24). The unitary conductance and NPo were not changed by mutation (data not shown). Results showed that CORM-2 at the concentration of 100 μM inhibited the NPo of Kir2.3 (T53I, I213L) channel by 12.29±2.79% (n=5). The blocking effect was diminished significantly compared with wild-type Kir2.3 (P<0.001, n=5), but was similar with that on Kir2.1. However, CORM-2 at the concentration of 100 μM significantly inhibited the NPo of the Kir2.1 (I79T, L222I) current by 39.64±3.28% (P<0.001, n=5), which is similar with its effect on the Kir2.3 channel (Fig. 5c).

Figure 5: CO regulated Kir2.3 channels by interfering the interaction between Kir2.3 channels and PIP2.

(a) Mutant of Kir2.3 and Kir2.1 channels were constructed as shown in the left panel. (b,c) CORM-2 at the concentration of 100 μM inhibited Kir2.3 (T53I, I213L) currents by 12.29±2.79% (n=5). CORM-2 at the concentration of 100 μM remarkably inhibited Kir2.1 (I79T, L222I) by 39.64±3.28% (n=5). **P<0.001 compared with Kir2.3 and Kir2.1, respectively.

Additionally, CORM-2 was applied alone or in the presence of diC8-PIP2 (the eight-carbon long acyl chains on PIP2, a synthetic water-soluble analogue of PIP2) pre-loaded via the patching pipette. PIP2 significantly rescued the inhibitory effect of CO on Kir2.3 expressed in HEK (Fig. 6a,b) and on IKir currents in the ventricles (Fig. 6c,d). These results indicated that Kir2.3 was regulated by CO due to its low affinity with PIP2, implying that CO blocked Kir2.3 by interfering with the channel-PIP2 interaction.

Figure 6: DiC8-PIP2 rescued the inhibitory effect of CO on myocardial IKir currents.

(a) Currents of Kir2.3 (expressed in HEK) in the presence of CORM-2 (10 μM) alone or with diC8-PIP2 (100 μM). (b) CORM-2 (10 μM) alone inhibited Kir2.3 by 50.23±3.63%. In the presence of 10, 50 and 100 μM diC8-PIP2, CORM-2 (10 μM) inhibited Kir2.3 by 48.65±4.30%, 37.18±3.14% and 22.74±3.81%, respectively. **P<0.001, n=6 in each group. (c) Myocardial IKir currents in the presence of CORM-2 (10 μM) alone or with diC8-PIP2 (100 μM). (d) CORM-2 (10 μM) alone inhibited rat myocardial IKir by 34.44±4.28%. In the presence of 100 μM diC8-PIP2, CORM-2 (10 μM) inhibited rat myocardial IKir by 15.96±3.24%. **P<0.001, n=4.


In summary, we demonstrated that CO inhibited IKir and prolongs APD in rat myocytes by regulating the interaction between Kir2.0 and PIP2, and profoundly inhibits Kir2.2 and Kir2.3 currents by decreasing the frequency of channel opening. According to the previous work25 which studied the structural basis of PIP2 activation of Kir2.2, the mutant Kir2.2 (I223L) (homologous to Kir2.3 (I213L) used in this study) affects conformation of the G-loop gate in a manner that might explain the apparent increased affinity for PIP2; compared with the wild-type Kir2.2, the G-loop of Kir2.2 (I223L) adopts its PIP2 binding conformation. Additionally, the rescuing effect of exogenous PIP2 on CO inhibition (Fig. 6) indicates the affinity change in PIP2 binding with Kir2.0 channels is one of keys. Dominant PIP2 binding with Kir2.3 by the increase of PIP2 concentration reduced the CO interference, resulting in the rescue of CO inhibition on Kir2.3. Nonetheless, based on the results of the wild type as well as the mutants Kir2.1 and Kir2.3, CO most likely modulates the Kir2.0 channel activity by affecting the channels’ interaction with PIP2.

Prolonged AP plays a key role in slowing down heart rate and lengthening the refractory period of myocytes. This may contribute to the prevention of reperfusion-induced VF. Very recent comprehensive analysis of regional ion-channel expression in normal and myopathic hearts documented that the ratio among Kir2.1, Kir2.2 and Kir2.3 is roughly around 13:7:8 in normal left ventricles and around 16:5:13 in myopathic left ventricles26. The elevation expression of Kir2.3 during the myopathic period pronounced the greater effect of CO in APD during the myopathy. It has been reported that Hmox1 was also significantly upregulated in myocardial infarction7, and its CO production was increased to protect the heart from reperfusion-induced VF8,9. Our results support this conclusion and underline the possible mechanism.

Atrial fibrillation is a common arrhythmia and Kir2.3 is highly expressed in atrium27. As CO inhibits Kir2.3 current and prolongs APD in myocytes, it may cause slowing down of heart rates28,29,30 and could be considered as a therapeutic target for AF. Kir2.0 has also previously been identified in mammalian forebrain31,32,33, nodes of Ranvier34, astrocytes35, heart26,27 and renal epithelial cells36, serving important roles in setting membrane potential, modulating AP waveform and buffering extracellular K+. Increased Hmox1 expression has been found in Alzheimer’s disease brains37,38 and its excessive product CO might cause depolarization and excitement of neuron by inhibition of Kir2.0. This new mechanism of the inhibitory effect of CO on Kir2.2 and Kir2.3 channels identifies a new physiological function of CO and offers a potential target for pharmacological and therapeutic application of CO by targeting Kir channels.



The methods in application of CO donor, tricarbonyldichlororuthenium (II) dimer [Ru(CO3)Cl2]2 (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA) was freshly dissolved in DMSO as a stock solution. The medium containing a certain concentration of CO donor was made 30 min before experiments. The control group contains donor solutions which were placed at room temperature for 3 days to exhaust CO39. DiC8-PIP2 was purchased from Echelon. Genistein was purchased from Sigma (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). Ranolazine was purchased from Tokyo Chemical Industry.

Animal experiments

Animal experiments was approved by the Ethics Review Board for Animal Studies of IMM, Peking University. Myocytes were prepared from ventricles by standard collagenase dissociation technique40.

cDNA constructs

Human Kir2.1 cDNA was cloned in human umbilical vein endothelial Cells. Kir2.1 (I79T, L222I) mutations were produced by Pfu mutagenesis with QuikChange kit (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA, USA). Human Kir2.2 cDNA was cloned in human ventricular myocytes. Human Kir2.3 and Kir2.3 (T53I, I213L) cDNAs were generously provided by Dr Hailin Zhang. All of the cDNAs above were confirmed with DNA sequencing (Majorbio, Shanghai, China).

Patch clamping

Conventional whole-cell and inside-out configurations of the patch-clamp technique were used in the electrophysiological study. Signals were amplified using an Axopatch 200B amplifier (Axon Instruments) and filtered at 1 kHz. Data acquisition and analysis were carried out using pClamp 9.0 (Axon Instruments) software. Patch electrodes were pulled from a horizontal micropipette puller (P-1000, Sutter Instruments) and fire polished to final tip resistance of 4–6 MΩ when filled with internal solutions. For whole-cell recording on myocytes, the pipette solution contained (in mM): 100 potassium aspartate (Sigma-Aldrich), 30 KCl, 1 MgCl2, 5 HEPES, 5 EGTA, 4 K2-ATP, pH 7.3 (adjusted with KOH); the bath solution contained (in mM): 140 NaCl, 5.4 KCl, 1.8 CaCl2, 1 MgCl2, 5 HEPES, 10 glucose, pH 7.4 (adjusted with NaOH). For whole-cell recording on HEK-293 cells, the pipette solution contained (in mM): 140 KCl, 2 MgCl2, 10 HEPES, 0.1 EGTA, 4 K2-ATP, pH 7.3 (adjusted with KOH); the bath solution contained (in mM): 120 NaCl, 5 KCl, 1.5 CaCl2, 1 MgCl2, 10 HEPES, 10 glucose, pH 7.4 (adjusted with NaOH). For single-channel recording, the pipette solution (extracellular) contained (in mM): 145 KCl, 10 HEPES, 10 glucose, pH 7.4 (adjusted with KOH); the bath solution (intracellular) contained (in mM): 145 KCl, 1.2 MgCl2, 10 HEPES, 0.1 EGTA, pH 7.38 (adjusted with KOH). Single-channel activity was recorded at a pipette voltage of 70 mV. The data were acquired at 20 KHz and low-pass filtered at 5 kHz. During post-analysis, data were further filtered at 200 Hz. Single-channel events were listed and analysed by pclampfit 9.0 (single-channel search-in-analyse function). NPo, the product of the number of channels and the open probability, was used to measure the channel activity within a patch. In total, 50% threshold cross-method was used to determine valid channel openings. Initial (1-2 min) single-channel records were normally used as the control. The activity of Kir2.0 during application of chemicals was normalized to activity during the control period to assess the effects of chemicals on Kir2.0 activity.


Data were given as the mean±s.e.m., ‘n’ is the number of cells studied. Paired t-test was used to compare channel activity before (control) and after the application of drugs. Effects of different treatments were assessed by normalizing activity (to pretreatment levels) and comparing groups by using one-way analysis of variance (SPSS 13.0, Cary, NC, USA). Dosage curve was fitted with non-linear Hill by using Originpro7.0 (OriginLab, Northampton, MA, USA).

Additional information

How to cite this article: Liang, S. et al. Carbon monoxide inhibits inward rectifier potassium channels in cardiomyocytes. Nat. Commun. 5:4676 doi: 10.1038/ncomms5676 (2014).


  1. 1

    Manning, A. S. & Hearse, D. J. Reperfusion-induced arrhythmias: mechanisms and prevention. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 16, 497–518 (1984).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Gray, R. A., Pertsov, A. M. & Jalife, J. Spatial and temporal organization during cardiac fibrillation. Nature 392, 75–78 (1998).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Solomon, S. D., Ridker, P. M. & Antman, E. M. Ventricular arrhythmias in trials of thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. A meta-analysis. Circulation 88, 2575–2581 (1993).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Tzivoni, D. et al. Ventricular fibrillation caused by myocardial reperfusion in Prinzmetal’s angina. Am. Heart J. 105, 323–325 (1983).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Mehta, R. H. et al. Sustained ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation in the cardiac catheterization laboratory among patients receiving primary percutaneous coronary intervention: incidence, predictors, and outcomes. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 43, 1765–1772 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Tenhunen, R., Marver, H. S. & Schmid, R. The enzymatic conversion of heme to bilirubin by microsomal heme oxygenase. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 61, 748–755 (1968).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Lakkisto, P. et al. Expression of heme oxygenase-1 in response to myocardial infarction in rats. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 34, 1357–1365 (2002).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Bak, I. et al. Heme oxygenase-1-related carbon monoxide production and ventricular fibrillation in isolated ischemic/reperfused mouse myocardium. FASEB J. 17, 2133–2135 (2003).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Csonka, C. et al. Heme oxygenase and cardiac function in ischemic/reperfused rat hearts. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 27, 119–126 (1999).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Motterlini, R. & Otterbein, L. E. The therapeutic potential of carbon monoxide. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 9, 728–743 (2010).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Dulak, J., Deshane, J., Jozkowicz, A. & Agarwal, A. Heme oxygenase-1 and carbon monoxide in vascular pathobiology: focus on angiogenesis. Circulation 117, 231–241 (2008).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Ahmed, A. New insights into the etiology of preeclampsia: identification of key elusive factors for the vascular complications. Thromb. Res. 127, (Suppl 3): S72–S75 (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Wu, L. & Wang, R. Carbon monoxide: endogenous production, physiological functions, and pharmacological applications. Pharmacol. Rev. 57, 585–630 (2005).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Dallas, M. L. et al. Carbon monoxide induces cardiac arrhythmia via induction of the late Na+ current. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care. Med. 186, 648–656 (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Antzelevitch, C., Burashnikov, A., Sicouri, S. & Belardinelli, L. Electrophysiologic basis for the antiarrhythmic actions of ranolazine. Heart Rhythm 8, 1281–1290 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Undrovinas, A. I., Belardinelli, L., Undrovinas, N. A. & Sabbah, H. N. Ranolazine improves abnormal repolarization and contraction in left ventricular myocytes of dogs with heart failure by inhibiting late sodium current. J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol. 17, (Suppl 1): S169–S177 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Antzelevitch, C. et al. Electrophysiologic properties and antiarrhythmic actions of a novel antianginal agent. J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol. Ther. 9, (Suppl 1): S65–S83 (2004).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Zhao, Z. et al. Molecular basis for genistein-induced inhibition of Kir2.3 currents. Pflugers Arch. 456, 413–423 (2008).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Lopes, C. M. et al. Alterations in conserved Kir channel-PIP2 interactions underlie channelopathies. Neuron 34, 933–944 (2002).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Zhang, H., He, C., Yan, X., Mirshahi, T. & Logothetis, D. E. Activation of inwardly rectifying K+ channels by distinct PtdIns(4,5)P2 interactions. Nat. Cell Biol. 1, 183–188 (1999).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Du, X. et al. Characteristic interactions with phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate determine regulation of kir channels by diverse modulators. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 37271–37281 (2004).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Qu, Z. et al. Identification of a critical motif responsible for gating of Kir2.3 channel by intracellular protons. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 13783–13789 (1999).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Wang, C. et al. Arachidonic acid activates Kir2.3 channels by enhancing channel-phosphatidyl-inositol 4,5-bisphosphate interactions. Mol. Pharmacol. 73, 1185–1194 (2008).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Lopez-Izquierdo, A. et al. Mechanisms for Kir channel inhibition by quinacrine: acute pore block of Kir2.x channels and interference in PIP2 interaction with Kir2.x and Kir6.2 channels. Pflugers Arch. 462, 505–517 (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Hansen, S. B., Tao, X. & MacKinnon, R. Structural basis of PIP2 activation of the classical inward rectifier K+ channel Kir2.2. Nature 477, 495–498 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Sivagangabalan, G. et al. Regional ion channel gene expression heterogeneity and ventricular fibrillation dynamics in human hearts. PLoS ONE 9, e82179 (2014).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Wang, Z., Yue, L., White, M., Pelletier, G. & Nattel, S. Differential distribution of inward rectifier potassium channel transcripts in human atrium versus ventricle. Circulation 98, 2422–2428 (1998).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Wijffels, M. C., Kirchhof, C. J., Dorland, R. & Allessie, M. A. Atrial fibrillation begets atrial fibrillation. A study in awake chronically instrumented goats. Circulation 92, 1954–1968 (1995).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Daoud, E. G. et al. Effect of atrial fibrillation on atrial refractoriness in humans. Circulation 94, 1600–1606 (1996).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30

    Bosch, R. F. et al. Ionic mechanisms of electrical remodeling in human atrial fibrillation. Cardiovasc. Res. 44, 121–131 (1999).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31

    Morishige, K. et al. Molecular cloning and functional expression of a novel brain-specific inward rectifier potassium channel. FEBS Lett. 346, 251–256 (1994).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32

    Bredt, D. S., Wang, T. L., Cohen, N. A., Guggino, W. B. & Snyder, S. H. Cloning and expression of two brain-specific inwardly rectifying potassium channels. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 92, 6753–6757 (1995).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33

    Karschin, C., Dissmann, E., Stuhmer, W. & Karschin, A. IRK(1-3) and GIRK(1-4) inwardly rectifying K+ channel mRNAs are differentially expressed in the adult rat brain. J. Neurosci. 16, 3559–3570 (1996).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34

    Mi, H., Deerinck, T. J., Jones, M., Ellisman, M. H. & Schwarz, T. L. Inwardly rectifying K+ channels that may participate in K+ buffering are localized in microvilli of Schwann cells. J. Neurosci. 16, 2421–2429 (1996).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35

    Perillan, P. R. et al. Inward rectifier K(+) channel Kir2.3 (IRK3) in reactive astrocytes from adult rat brain. Glia 31, 181–192 (2000).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36

    Welling, P. A. Primary structure and functional expression of a cortical collecting duct Kir channel. Am. J. Physiol. 273, F825–F836 (1997).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37

    Schipper, H. M., Liberman, A. & Stopa, E. G. Neural heme oxygenase-1 expression in idiopathic Parkinson’s disease. Exp. Neurol. 150, 60–68 (1998).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38

    Takahashi, M. et al. Amyloid precursor proteins inhibit heme oxygenase activity and augment neurotoxicity in Alzheimer’s disease. Neuron 28, 461–473 (2000).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39

    Wang, S., Publicover, S. & Gu, Y. An oxygen-sensitive mechanism in regulation of epithelial sodium channel. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 2957–2962 (2009).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40

    Isenberg, G. & Klockner, U. Calcium tolerant ventricular myocytes prepared by preincubation in a ‘KB medium’. Pflugers Arch. 395, 6–18 (1982).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


This work is supported by the research grants held by Y.G. (National Key Basic Research Program of China No. 2013CB531200/6, 973 Project No. 2013CB531206 and NSF No.81170236) and programme grants from the British Heart Foundation (RG/09/001/25940) and Medical Research Council (G0700288) to A.A.

Author information




S.L., Q.W. and W.Z. generated the data and performed the preliminary analysis; Y.G. contributed to experimental design, writing-up and finalizing the manuscript; H.Z., S.T. and A.A. contributed to advice, discussion and writing the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuchun Gu.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figures 1-2 (PDF 56 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liang, S., Wang, Q., Zhang, W. et al. Carbon monoxide inhibits inward rectifier potassium channels in cardiomyocytes. Nat Commun 5, 4676 (2014).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing