Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Planar hexagonal B36 as a potential basis for extended single-atom layer boron sheets


Boron is carbon’s neighbour in the periodic table and has similar valence orbitals. However, boron cannot form graphene-like structures with a honeycomb hexagonal framework because of its electron deficiency. Computational studies suggest that extended boron sheets with partially filled hexagonal holes are stable; however, there has been no experimental evidence for such atom-thin boron nanostructures. Here, we show experimentally and theoretically that B36 is a highly stable quasiplanar boron cluster with a central hexagonal hole, providing the first experimental evidence that single-atom layer boron sheets with hexagonal vacancies are potentially viable. Photoelectron spectroscopy of B36 reveals a relatively simple spectrum, suggesting a symmetric cluster. Global minimum searches for B36 lead to a quasiplanar structure with a central hexagonal hole. Neutral B36 is the smallest boron cluster to have sixfold symmetry and a perfect hexagonal vacancy, and it can be viewed as a potential basis for extended two-dimensional boron sheets.


Soon after the discovery of carbon nanotubes1, analogous boron nanotubes were proposed2,3. However, a perfectly planar triangular lattice made of the boron nanotubes is unstable and instead adopts a rather buckled form4,5,6,7. Recent computational studies suggest that a triangular planar boron lattice with hexagonal vacancies is more stable8,9, which would be suitable to form the putative boron nanotubes and it underlies the stability of the proposed B80 fullerene10. However, there has been no experimental evidence for the viability of this newly proposed planar boron sheet. Joint experimental and computational studies over the past decade have shown that boron clusters are planar or quasiplanar at large sizes11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21, in contrast to bulk boron where three-dimensional (3D) cages are prevalent. Boron clusters with a triangular lattice have invariably found to exhibit out-of-plane distortions12,13,14,15,16,17,19,20,21. Tetragonal or pentagonal defects are often found in truly planar boron clusters up to 23 atoms12,17,18,19,20.

Here we report the discovery of a quasiplanar boron cluster with sixfold symmetry and a perfect central hexagonal hole, providing the first experimental evidence that large-scale planar boron sheets with hexagonal vacancies are potentially viable. This joint photoelectron spectroscopy (PES) and theoretical study shows that the B36 cluster is quasiplanar with a central hexagonal hole. Neutral B36 is found to be a highly stable cluster with perfect C6v hexagonal symmetry. Extension of this cluster would give rise to the planar boron sheets with hexagonal vacancies8,9,22,23.


PES of the B36 cluster

Boron cluster anions with up to 24 atoms have been investigated previously11,12,13,16,17,18,19,20,21. The PES spectra became more congested and complicated for clusters larger than 20 atoms19,20,21, presenting considerable challenges for both computational global minimum searches and comparison between experiment and theory. However, we found that the spectrum of B36 (Fig. 1a) is special, showing an unusually low electron-binding energy and well-resolved spectral features in the low binding energy side. We also measured the spectrum at 266 nm (not shown) with slightly higher resolution. The adiabatic detachment energy of 3.12 eV measured from the sharp onset of the first detachment band X in the 266 nm spectrum also represents the electron affinity (EA) of neutral B36. It is surprising that the EA of B36 is even smaller than that of B22 (3.34 eV) (ref. 20) or B24 (3.55 eV) (ref. 21), since the EA generally increases with increasing cluster size. The low EA of B36 is a result of the large energy gap, as revealed by the X–A separation, suggesting that neutral B36 is a highly stable cluster with a large energy gap between its highest occupied (HOMO) and lowest unoccupied (LUMO) molecular orbitals. The weak feature X′ observed in Fig. 1a is due to contributions of a low-lying isomer (vide infra). The vertical detachment energies (VDEs) of the observed detachment transitions are given in Supplementary Table 1.

Figure 1: Photoelectron spectroscopy of B 36 and comparison with simulation.
figure 1

(a) The experimental spectrum at 193 nm. (b) The simulated spectrum for the global minimum quasiplanar structure with a hexagonal hole (I in Fig. 2a). (c) The simulated spectrum for the tubular isomer (II in Fig. 2a). (d) The simulated spectrum for the quasiplanar structure with two holes (III in Fig. 2a). The vertical bars in the simulated spectra represent the calculated VDEs. The simulated spectra were obtained by fitting the VDEs with a unit area Gaussian function of 0.05 eV width.

VDEs are usually measured from the peak maxima from PES spectra. For small clusters or simpler systems, PES bands are well separated and each band represents a single detachment transition. In the current case, bands X and A are well resolved and they should each correspond to a single electron detachment channel, as given in Supplementary Table 1. The VDEs for bands X (3.3. eV) and A (4.08 eV) are directly obtained from the band maximum in each case. Band B is relatively broad, which is likely a result of several overlapping detachment transitions. Consequently, a range of energy (4.2–4.5 eV) is given for band B in Supplementary Table 1. Following an energy gap, more congested detachment features are observed above 5 eV, suggesting a high density of electronic states. The label C is given to represent the signals from about 5.1–5.4 eV. An intense band D is observed at ~5.6 eV, which is also likely a result of overlapping detachment transitions. The sharp spikes on the higher binding energy side of band D cannot be assigned as individual detachment transitions because of the relatively low signal-to-noise ratios in this part of the spectrum. Finally, the label E represents the broad signals around 6.1 eV. Hence, all the labels from B to E do not represent individual detachment transitions and they are solely for the sake of discussion. The congested detachment transitions for such a large cluster are expected, as borne out from comparisons with the theoretical results (infra vide). The broad X band suggests a significant structural change from the anion to the neutral ground state. Despite the congested spectral features in the higher binding energy side, the relatively simple spectral pattern in the low binding energy side and the large HOMO–LUMO gap indicate that neutral B36 should be a highly symmetric cluster.

Computational results

We searched for energetically low-lying isomers of B36 with the Cartesian Walking (CW) method19 and TGmin24, a constrained Basin–Hopping code using energies from density functional theory (DFT). Among the 3,000 or so trial structures in our search, a quasiplanar pseudo-C6v structure with a hexagonal hole was found to be much more stable than any other isomers. We also considered a ring-type structure, which was shown to be stable for large boron clusters13,15,20,25,26,27. Refined geometry optimizations and vibrational frequency calculations were performed using DFT method with the hybrid PBE028 exchange-correlation functional with the 6-311G* basis set29 on all structures within 70 kcal mol−1 of the pseudo-C6v global minimum structure (Supplementary Fig. 1). Zero-point energy corrections were included for all the isomers at the PBE0/6-311G* level. The effect of including the zero-point corrections was small for isomers of similar structures but could be substantial (shifting relative energy values by around 2 kcal mol−1) for isomers of different structural types (that is, 2D versus 3D). We found that the hexagonal global minimum structure of B36 and its corresponding neutral species exhibit C2v (pseudo-C6v) and C6v symmetries, respectively (Fig. 2). The nearest isomers of B36, a triple ring and a double-hole quasiplanar structure, lie 10.5 and 14.7 kcal mol−1 higher in energy at the PBE0 level of theory. Our global search also led to a number of other 3D structures, such as cage-like structures and two-layer structures, which are all much higher in energy (see Supplementary Fig. 1). Cartesian coordinates of the three lowest-lying structures of B36 and B36 (Fig. 2) are given in Supplementary Table 2.

Figure 2: The global minimum and low-lying isomers of B36 and B36.
figure 2

(a) Relative energies for the isomers of B36 are given in kcal mol−1 at the PBE0/6-311G* and CCSD/6-31+G*//PBE0/6-311G* (in parenthesis) levels of theory. (b) Relative energies for the isomers of B36 are given in kcal mol−1 at the PBE0/6-311G* level of theory. All energies have been corrected for zero-point energies at the PBE0/6-311G* level.

Comparison of experimental and simulated spectra of B36

To confirm the global minimum of B36, we compare its simulated spectrum with the experimental data in Fig. 1 and Supplementary Table 1. The relatively simple spectral pattern can act as an electronic fingerprint. The overall simulated spectral pattern of the C2v global minimum of B36 (Fig. 1b) is in good accord with the experimental spectrum. In particular, the calculated first and second VDEs are in excellent agreement with the experimental observation, confirming the large HOMO–LUMO gap observed and the unusually low EA of B36. The LUMO of the hexagonal B36 (C6v) is doubly degenerate with e2 symmetry (Supplementary Fig. 2). The C2v symmetry of B36 is, hence, due to the Jahn–Teller effect as a result of the occupation of the degenerate LUMO in the anion. The broad X band is consistent with a significant geometry change between the anionic and neutral B36, primarily involving the distortion of the hexagonal hole in the anion (Supplementary Fig. 3).

However, the higher binding energy side of the experimental spectrum (Fig. 1a) is complicated and is not reproduced well by the simulated spectrum of the C2v global minimum of B36 (Fig. 2b). Furthermore, the weak peak labelled as X′ observed experimentally was not reproduced by the simulated spectrum of the C2v B36, consistent with the suggestion that it might be due to a low-lying isomer. We further tested the possibility of isomer contributions by computing the VDEs for the two lowest-lying isomers (II and III in Fig. 2a), as presented in Fig. 1c,d and Supplementary Tables 3 and 4, respectively. The first five detachment channels of the tubular isomer II are close to each other around 3.7 eV (Fig. 1c and Supplementary Table 3), corresponding to the gap region between bands X and A. Thus, isomer II can be ruled out as a discernible contributor to the observed spectrum. On the other hand, the first detachment channel of isomer III is in good agreement with the X′ band (Fig. 1d and Supplementary Table 4). Furthermore, the second and third detachment channels of isomer III agree well with the broad band B, and the higher detachment channels of isomer III also seem to coincide with the congested higher binding energy part of the experimental spectrum. However, isomer III is 14.7 kcal mol−1 higher than the global minimum isomer I at the PBE0 level and it is not expected to be populated in any significant amount because our cluster beam is expected to be fairly cold. Under similar experimental conditions, van der Waals complexes of Ar and anionic gold clusters were observed,30 indicating a vibrational temperature of <200 K. We then calculated the energies of the first three isomers using the more accurate, but computationally more demanding, CCSD level31 of theory with the 6-31+G* basis set32 (Fig. 2a) and found that the double hole quasiplanar isomer III became more stable, only 1.17 kcal mol−1 above the global minimum C2v isomer. Thus, isomer III would be expected to be substantially populated experimentally. The tubular isomer became 23.97 kcal mol−1 above the global minimum and its presence in our experiment can be safely ruled out. The combination of the simulated spectra of isomers I and III and their close energetic stability provide a much satisfying agreement with the experimental observations, lending considerable credence for the identified C2v global minimum with a hexagonal hole for B36.

The electronic structure and stability of the hexagonal B36

Our calculations show that neutral B36 has perfect hexagonal symmetry (C6v) and is overwhelmingly stable relative to the closest-lying isomers II or III (Fig. 2b). The hexagonal B36 has an out-of-plane distortion with the shape of a bowl, and its valence molecular orbitals are shown to be similar to those of a planar structure optimized with D6h constraint. DFT calculations at the PBE0/6-311G* level of theory show that the D6h structure is a saddle point at ~9 kcal mol−1 above the C6v global minimum. The peripheral B–B bonding is enhanced upon shortening the B–B distance, which induces the out-of-plane bending in B36 to the C6v bowl shape. The bowl height is 1.16 Å with two different types of peripheral B–B distances, which are reduced from 1.61 and 1.72 Å in D6h to 1.58 and 1.67 Å, respectively, in the C6v structure (I0 in Fig. 2b). The shorter bond length occurs between the six apex B atoms and their neighbours (1.58 Å), while the remaining six peripheral B–B bonds are slightly longer (1.67 Å). We analysed the chemical bonding of the hexagonal C6v B36 as well as the D6h form of the cluster using adaptive natural density partitioning (AdNDP)33, which localizes the computed density matrix into n-centre two-electron (nc-2e) bonds, with n ranging from one to the total number of atoms in the molecule. The AdNDP analysis of the D6h structure is shown in Fig. 3; an analysis of the C6v structure leads to similar results. AdNDP reveals 12 2c-2e σ bonds describing the shorter B–B bonds involving the six apex B atoms, 12 3c-2e σ bonds, 18 4c-2e σ bonds, six 4c-2e π bonds and six completely delocalized 36c-2e π bonds. The bonding pattern suggests that the B36 cluster can be viewed as six hexagonal B7 (B©B6) units bound together by the 12 3c-2e σ bonds and the six 36c-2e π bonds. The totally delocalized 36c-2e π bonds in B36 are interesting, which may be partly responsible for the remarkable stability of this hexagonal boron cluster.

Figure 3: Chemical bonding analysis for the hexagonal C6v structure of B36.
figure 3

The analysis was performed using the AdNDP method33. ON stands for occupation number and is equal to 2.00 |e| (meaning a density of exactly two electrons) in the ideal case.

The necessity of hexagonal holes in stable planar 2D boron sheets was analysed in detail by Tang and Ismail-Beigi8, who considered the electronic structures of a graphene-like hexagonal boron sheet and a triangular boron lattice. They also showed a model B32 cluster with a hexagonal hole to be more stable than a double ring structure. To explore the effect of the hexagonal hole on the stability of the B36 cluster, we also optimized the structure of a B37 cluster with C6v symmetry by filling the hexagonal hole in B36 with an extra B atom. We found that this B37 cluster with a triangular lattice has an open-shell quartet electronic state with a (a1) (ref. 1) (e2) (ref. 2) configuration. The optimized structure is found to have changed significantly from the C6v B36 cluster: buckling of certain boron atoms was observed in contrast to the smooth bowl shape in the parent B36. This buckling of the B37 cluster is similar to the buckled 2D boron sheets with triangular lattices4,5,6,7,8. The calculated atomization energy per B atom at the PBE/TZ2P level34,35 reduces from 130.8 kcal mol−1 (5.67 eV per atom) for the C6v B36 cluster to 128.9 kcal mol−1 (5.59 eV per atom) for the C6v B37 cluster. Interestingly, the difference in the atomization energy (~0.08 eV per atom) between the hexagonal C6v B36 and the buckled B37 cluster is also similar to that of the most stable 2D boron sheet with hexagonal holes and the buckled triangular 2D sheet (~0.11 eV per atom) at the DFT GGA level8.

The relationship of the hexagonal B36 and 2D boron sheets

The hexagonal hole in the B36 cluster is reminiscent of the hexagonal vacancies in the 2D boron sheets recently predicted8,9. The B36 cluster can be viewed as the analogous boron unit of the hexagonal C6 unit in graphene to form extended graphene-like boron nanostructures with hexagonal holes, as shown schematically in Fig. 4. The structure shown in Fig. 4 represents a hexagonal hole density of η=1/27 (one vacancy per 27 lattice sites in a triangular lattice), as defined for the 2D boron sheet8. The structure in Fig. 4 is constructed by sharing a row of B atoms between two neighbouring B36 units. The apex atoms (circled in Fig. 4) are shared by three neighbouring B36 units. If these atoms are removed, one arrives at the more stable α-sheet with η=1/9 (refs 8, 9). Interestingly, a B30 model has been used to analyse the bonding in the proposed α-sheet36, which is equivalent to removing all six apex B atoms in the B36 cluster. Hence, the B36 cluster can be viewed as the embryo for the various proposed stable 2D boron sheets.

Figure 4: Relationship between B 36 and borophene.
figure 4

A schematic view of part of an extended one-atom-thick boron sheet, named borophene, as constructed from the planar hexagonal B36 unit. The circles represent the apex atoms in the B36 unit that are shared by three units. Removal of these atoms would lead to the α-sheet8.

However, it should be pointed out that Fig. 4 is only schematically showing the relationship between the hexagonal B36 cluster and the stable 2D boron sheet. It does not represent the growth mechanism of the putative boron sheet, as it has been shown computationally that large boron clusters exhibit polymorphism with close-lying 3D cage-like structures37,38. Liu et al.39 have considered computationally possible synthesis of 2D boron sheets on coinage metal surfaces as substrates, analogous to the synthesis of graphene. Thus, B36 or other small boron clusters with hexagonal holes may serve as the nuclei for the formation of large-scale 2D boron sheets on the substrate.


The present study provides the first experimental evidence for the viability of novel boron nanostructures with hexagonal vacancies. These structures can indeed exist and may be synthesized using appropriate substrates39. The potential large-scale synthesis of the new atom-thick boron nanosheets calls for an appropriate name: ‘borophene’ is proposed here, in analogy to graphene. The electronic structure of the 2D boron sheets can be either metallic or semiconducting, according to theoretical calculations8,9,22,23. Owing to the hexagonal holes, various chemical modifications are possible to tune the electronic and chemical properties of borophenes40,41. Thus, borophene may constitute a new class of atom-thick nanostructures complementary to graphene.


Photoelectron spectroscopy

The experiment was performed using a PES apparatus equipped with a magnetic-bottle photoelectron analyser and a supersonic cluster source42. Boron cluster anions (Bx) were produced by laser vaporization of a hot-pressed boron target made of 10B-enriched powder with a helium carrier gas seeded with 5% argon, which was shown previously to produce cold clusters30. The clusters were entrained in the carrier gas and underwent a supersonic expansion. Negatively charged clusters were extracted from the cluster beam and analysed by a time-of-flight mass spectrometer. Clusters of interest were mass-selected, decelerated and photodetached by a laser beam at 266 and 193 nm. The photoelectron spectra were measured using a magnetic-bottle PES analyser and calibrated by the known spectra of Au and Bi. The resolution (ΔEk/Ek) of the magnetic-bottle analyser was 2.5%—that is, 25 meV for 1 eV electrons.

Computational and theoretical methods

DFT global minimum searches were carried out using two methods, the CW method and a constrained Basin–Hopping method in the TGMin code24. The CW method has been described in detail elsewhere19. The CW search of B36 used DFT for energy evaluation, employing the PBE functional and the 3-21G basis set43 from the Gaussian 09 program44. Within roughly 500 trial structures, a quasiplanar structure of near C6v symmetry with a central hexagonal hole was found to be low in energy. We re-optimized all trial structures under 20 kcal mol−1 at the PBE0/3-21G level; the pseudo-C6v structure remained the lowest in energy.

Using the TGMin code we performed a more thorough search for the global minimum of B36. The calculations were carried out using the DFT formalism with the PBE exchange-correlation functional and the Goedecker–Teter–Hutter pseudopotential45 with the associated double-ζ valence plus polarization basis set35 for boron via the CP2K program46. Among more than 2,500 possible structures produced by TGMin and the manually built tubular structures, we located a bowl-shaped pseudo-C6v isomer with a hexagonal hole in the centre as the global minimum of B36 (Fig. 1a), in agreement with the CW result. Further analyses and geometry optimizations indicate that the actual symmetries of this anion and its neutral cluster are C2v and C6v, respectively. We further refined the energies by reoptimizing the geometries of low-lying isomers within 70 kcal mol−1 of the global minimum using DFT method with the hybrid PBE0 functional and the 6-311G* basis set from the Gaussian 09 program. Vibrational frequencies were calculated for each isomer and all the structures were ensured to be minima on the potential energy surface without imaginary frequencies. The re-optimized geometric structures and the PBE0 energies of the low-lying structures within 63 kcal mol−1 of the global minimum are given in Supplementary Fig. 1. For more accurate relative energy assessment, single point calculations for the three lowest lying isomers were carried out using the CCSD formalism with the 6-31+G* basis set at their corresponding PBE0/6-311G* geometries using the Molpro software package47,48,49.

We calculated the VDEs for the three low-lying structures to compare with the experimental photoelectron spectrum. The VDEs were computed using an approach named ΔSCF-TDDFT previously50,51. In this approach, the ground-state energies of the anions and the neutrals were calculated at the optimized geometries of the anions from the ΔSCF energy differences at the PBE0/6-311+G* level of theory, whereas the vertical excited-state energies of the electron-detached neutral species were obtained from TDDFT calculations at the geometries of the anions. These excitation energies were then added to the first VDE to approximate the high-lying VDEs. Only those neutral excited states with one-electron detachment from the anion ground state were chosen. The relative intensities used for the VDEs were assigned empirically on the basis of the spin multiplicities of the final states, one for singlet and two for triplet final states. The simulated PES spectra were constructed by fitting the distribution of the VDEs with unit-area Gaussian functions of 0.07 eV full width at half-maximum. This approach has been used extensively in elucidating the structures of size-selected clusters previously16,17,18,19,20,21.

Additional information

How to cite this article: Piazza, Z. A. et al. Planar hexagonal B36 as a potential basis for extended single-atom layer boron sheets . Nat. Commun. 5:3113 doi: 10.1038/ncomms4113 (2014).


  1. Iijima, S. Helical microtubules of graphitic carbon. Nature 354, 56–58 (1991).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Boustani, I. & Quandt, A. Nanotubules of bare boron clusters: ab initio and density functional study. Europhys. Lett. 39, 527–532 (1997).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gindulyté, A., Lipscomb, W. & Massa, N. L. Proposed boron nanotubes. Inorg. Chem. 37, 6544–6545 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Boustani, I., Quandt, A., Hernandez, E. & Rubio, A. New boron based nanostructure materials. J. Chem. Phys. 110, 3176–3185 (1999).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Evans, M. H., Joannopoulos, J. D. & Pantelides, S. T. Electronic and mechanical properties of planar and tubular boron structures. Phys. Rev. B 72, 045434 (2005).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kunstmass, J. & Quandt, A. Broad boron sheets and boron nanotubes: an ab initio study of structural, electronic, and mechanical properties. Phys. Rev. B 74, 035413 (2006).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lau, K. C. & Pandey, R. Stability and electronic properties of atomistically-engineered 2D boron sheets. J. Phys. Chem. C 111, 2906–2912 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tang, H. & Ismail-Beigi, S. Novel precursors for boron nanotubes: the competition of two-center and three-center bonding in boron sheets. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 115501 (2007).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yang, X., Ding, Y. & Ni, J. Ab initio prediction of stable boron sheets and boron nanotubes: structure, stability, and electronic properties. Phys. Rev. B 77, 041402 (2008).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Szwacki, N. G., Sadrzadeh, A. & Yakobson, B. I. B80 fullerene: an ab initio prediction of geometry, stability, and electronic structure. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 166804 (2007).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhai, H. J., Alexandrova, A. N., Birch, K. A., Boldyrev, A. I. & Wang, L. S. Hepta- and octacoordinate boron in molecular wheels of eight- and nine-atom boton clusters: observation and confirmation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 42, 6004–6008 (2003).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhai, H. J., Kiran, B., Li, J. & Wang, L. S. Hydrocarbon analogues of boron clusters – planarity, aromaticity and antiaromaticity. Nat. Mater. 2, 827–833 (2003).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kiran, B. et al. Planar-to-tubular structural transition in boron clusters: B20 as the embryo of single-walled boron nanotubes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 961–964 (2005).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Alexandrova, A. N., Boldyrev, A. I., Zhai, H. J. & Wang, L. S. All-boron aromatic clusters as potential new inorganic ligands and building blocks in chemistry. Coord. Chem. Rev. 250, 2811–2866 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Oger, E. et al. Boron cluster cations: transition from planar to cylindrical structures. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 46, 8503–8506 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sergeeva, A. P., Zubarev, D. Y., Zhai, H. J., Boldyrev, A. I. & Wang, L. S. A photoelectron spectroscopic and theoretical study of B16 and B162–: an all-boron naphthalene. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 7244–7246 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sergeeva, A. P., Averkiev, B. B., Zhai, H. J., Boldyrev, A. I. & Wang, L. S. All-boron analogues of aromatic hydrocarbons: B17 and B18. J. Chem. Phys. 134, 224304 (2011).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Huang, W. et al. A concentric planar doubly π-aromatic B19 cluster. Nat. Chem. 2, 202–206 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Piazza, Z. A. et al. A photoelectron spectroscopy and ab initio study of B21: negatively charged boron clusters continue to be planar at 21. J. Chem. Phys. 136, 104310 (2012).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sergeeva, A. P. et al. B22 and B23: all-boron analogues of anthracene and phenanthrene. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 18065–18073 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Popov, I. A., Piazza, Z. A., Li, W. L., Wang, L. S. & Boldyrev, A. I. A combined photoelectron spectroscopy and ab initio study of the quasi-planar B24 cluster. J. Chem. Phys. 139, 144307 (2013).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Penev, E. S., Bhowmick, S., Sadrzadeh, A. & Yakobson, B. I. Polymorphism of two-dimensional boron. Nano Lett. 12, 24412445 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wu, X. et al. Two-dimensional boron monolayer sheets. ACS Nano 6, 7443–7453 (2012).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhao, Y. F. & Li, J. TGMin: a global minimum search code based on basin-hopping and divide-and-concur strategy. Nano Res (in press).

  25. An, W., Bulusu, S., Gao, Y. & Zeng, X. C. Relative stability of planar versus double-ring tubular isomers of neutral and anionic boron cluster B20 and B20. J. Chem. Phys. 124, 154310 (2006).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Tian, F. Y. & Wang, Y. X. The competition of double-, four-, and three-ring tubular B3n (n=8–32) nanoclusters. J. Chem. Phys. 129, 024903 (2008).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Tai, T. B., Tam, N. M. & Nguyen, M. T. Structure of boron clusters revisited, Bn with n=14–20. Chem. Phys. Lett. 530, 71–76 (2012).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Adamo, C. & Barone, V. Toward reliable density functional methods without adjustable parameters: the PBE0 model. J. Chem. Phys. 110, 6158–6165 (1999).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Krishnan, R., Binkley, J. S., Seeger, R. & Pople, J. A. Self-consistent molecular orbital methods. XX. A basis set for correlated wave functions. J. Chem. Phys. 72, 650–654 (1980).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Huang, W. & Wang, L. S. Probing the 2D-to-3D structural transition in gold cluster anions using argon-tagging. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 153401 (2009).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Cizek, J. On the use of the cluster expansion and the technique of diagrams in calculations of correlation effects in atoms and molecules. Adv. Chem. Phys. 14, 35–89 (1969).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Francl, M. M. et al. Self-consistent molecular orbital methods. XXIII. A polarization-type basis set for second-row elements. J. Chem. Phys. 77, 3654–3665 (1982).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Zubarev, D. Y. & Boldyrev, A. I. Developing paradigms of chemical bonding: adaptive natural density partitioning. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 10, 5207–5217 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Vandevondele, J. & Hutter, J. Gaussian basis sets for accurate calculations on molecular systems in gas and condensed phases. J. Chem. Phys. 127, 114105 (2007).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Galeev, T. R. et al. Deciphering the mystery of hexagonal holes in an all-boron graphene α-sheet. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 13, 11575–11578 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Prasad, D. L. V. K. & Jemmis, E. D. Stuffing improves the stability of fullerenelike boron clusters. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 165504 (2008).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. De, S. et al. Energy landscape of fullerene materials: a comparison of boron to boron nitride and carbon. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 225502 (2011).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Liu, Y., Penev, E. S. & Yakobson, B. I. Probing the synthesis of two-dimensional boron by first-principles computations. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 52, 3156–3159 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Tang, H. & Ismail-Beigi, S. Self-doping in boron sheets from first principles: a route to structural design of metal boride nanostructures. Phys. Rev. B 80, 134113 (2009).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Er, S., de Wijs, G. A. & Brocks, G. DFT study of planar boron sheets: a new template for hydrogen storage. J. Phys. Chem. C 113, 18962–18967 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Wang, L. S., Cheng, H. S. & Fan, J. W. Photoelectron spectroscopy of size-selected transition metal clusters: Fen, n=3–24. J. Chem. Phys. 102, 9480–9493 (1995).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Binkley, J. S., Pople, J. A. & Hehre, W. J. Self-consistent molecular orbital methods. 22. Small split-valence basis sets for second-row elements. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 104, 2797–2803 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Frisch, M. J. et al. Gaussian 09, Revision A.1 Gaussian Inc. (2009).

  45. Goedecker, S., Teter, M. & Hutter, J. Separable dual-space gaussian pseudopotentials. Phys. Rev. B 54, 1703–1710 (1996).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Vandevondele, J. et al. QUICKSTEP: fast and accurate density functional calculations using a mixed gaussian and plane waves approach. Comput. Phys. Commun. 167, 103–128 (2005).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Werner, H.-J., Knowles, P. J., Knizia, G., Manby, F. R. & Shutz, M. Molpro: a general-purpose quantum chemistry program package. WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci. 2, 245–253 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Hampel, C., Peterson, K. & Werner, H.-J. A comparison of the efficiency and accuracy of the quadratic configuration interaction (QCISD), coupled cluster (CCSD), and Brueckner coupled cluster (CSSD) method. Chem. Phys. Lett 190, 1–12 (1992).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Werner, H.-J. et al. MOLPRO, version 2012.1, a packge of ab initio programs. See http://www/

  50. Li, X., Kiran, B., Li, J., Zhai, H. J. & Wang, L. S. Experimental observation and confirmation of icosahedral W@Au12 and Mo@Au12 molecules. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 41, 4786–4789 (2002).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Li, J., Li, X., Zhai, H. J. & Wang, L. S. Au20: a tetrahedral cluster. Science 299, 864–867 (2003).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank Dr C. Romanescu and Dr H. J. Zhai for earlier experimental assistance. We are indebted to Professor A. I. Boldyrev for discussions and assistance in the development of the Cartesian Walk method and to Dr Dezhi Wang (Boston College) for help in preparing the hot-pressed boron target. The experimental work was supported by the National Science Foundation (CHE-1263745). This work used the Extreme Science and Engineering Discover Environment (XSEDE), which was supported by the National Science Foundation (OCI-1053575). The theoretical work performed at the Tsinghua University was supported by NKBRSF (2011CB932400) and NSFC (20933003, 91026003) of China. The calculations were performed using the Center for Computation and Visualization (CCV) at Brown University, the Supercomputer Center of the Computer Network Information Center at the Chinese Academy of Sciences and the Molecular Science Computing capability at the EMSL, a national scientific user facility sponsored by the Department of Energy’s Office of Biological and Environmental Research and located at PNNL, a multiprogram national laboratory operated for the Department of Energy by Battelle.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



W.-L.L performed the experiment and analysed the data. Z.A.P., H.-S.H. and Y.-F.Z. did the calculations. L.-S.W. and J.L. designed the research. Z.A.P., W.-L.L., J.L. and L.-S.W. co-wrote the paper.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jun Li or Lai-Sheng Wang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figures 1-3 and Supplementary Tables 1-4 (PDF 2202 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Piazza, Z., Hu, HS., Li, WL. et al. Planar hexagonal B36 as a potential basis for extended single-atom layer boron sheets. Nat Commun 5, 3113 (2014).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing