Epithelial stem cells (EpSCs) in the hair follicle bulge are required for hair follicle growth and cycling. The isolation and propagation of human EpSCs for tissue engineering purposes remains a challenge. Here we develop a strategy to differentiate human iPSCs (hiPSCs) into CD200+/ITGA6+ EpSCs that can reconstitute the epithelial components of the hair follicle and interfollicular epidermis. The hiPSC-derived CD200+/ITGA6+ cells show a similar gene expression signature as EpSCs directly isolated from human hair follicles. Human iPSC-derived CD200+/ITGA6+ cells are capable of generating all hair follicle lineages including the hair shaft, and the inner and outer root sheaths in skin reconstitution assays. The regenerated hair follicles possess a KRT15+ stem cell population and produce hair shafts expressing hair-specific keratins. These results suggest an approach for generating large numbers of human EpSCs for tissue engineering and new treatments for hair loss, wound healing and other degenerative skin disorders.
Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) have been generated from somatic cells by transduction of reprogramming transcription factors, such as cMYC, SOX2, KLF4 and OCT4. The resulting iPSCs resemble embryonic stem cells (ESCs) in their properties and potential to differentiate into a variety of adult cell types. Reprogramming of somatic cells into iPSCs has tremendous potential for clinical application. The pluripotency of iPSCs, along with their genetic identity to specific patients, raises the possibility of their use to treat patients suffering from a myriad of diseases1,2. However, there remain challenges in differentiating iPSCs into certain cell types.
In the skin, epithelial stem cells (EpSCs) in the hair follicle contribute not only to the generation of a new hair follicle with each hair cycle but also to the repair of the epidermis during wound healing3,4. Hair follicle EpSCs reside in a specialized microenvironment called the bulge, a region at or near the base of the non-cycling portion of each hair follicle5. We previously demonstrated that hair follicle EpSCs in human scalp specifically express cytokeratin 15 (KRT15)6,7, and more recently CD200 and ITGA6 have been shown as surface markers for hEpSCs within hair follicles8. The discovery of membrane markers of EpSCs enables researchers to isolate human EpSCs population for functional studies.
Human keratinocytes have been reported being derived from ESCs and iPSCs9,10,11. However, directed differentiation of human iPSCs (hiPSCs) or ESCs into folliculogenic EpSCs has not been successful to date and remains an important challenge that needs to be addressed. It is likely that human EpSCs will be useful in the treatment of diseases such as alopecias, ectodermal dysplasias, monilethrix, Netherton syndrome, Menkes disease and hereditary epidermolysis bullosa. Additionally, other skin problems such as burn wounds, chronic wounds and ulcers will benefit from stem cell-related therapies12.
Here we show that directed differentiation of hiPSCs into EpSCs in vitro can be achieved by precise temporal control of the activities of EGF, retinoic acid (RA) and BMP signalling. The hiPSC-derived EpSCs are sorted based on CD200 and ITGA6 expression. CD200+/ITGA6+ EpSCs show a similar gene expression signature as that of EpSCs isolated directly from human hair follicles. More importantly, we demonstrate that hiPSC-derived EpSCs reconstitute the epithelial components of the hair follicle and interfollicular epidermis in vivo. Thus, the hiPSC-derived EpSCs are folliculogenic and functionally similar to bulge EpSCs.
Generation of hiPSCs from dermal fibroblasts
We generated hiPSCs from freshly isolated adult dermal fibroblasts using OCT3/4, SOX2 and KLF4 as previously described13,14,15,16. hiPSC clones exhibiting characteristic human embryonic stem cell (hESC) morphology were isolated ~45 days after transduction (Supplementary Fig. 1a). Similar to the H9 hESCs, our hiPSC lines showed high levels of alkaline phosphatase (also known as TRA2-49-6E) activity (Supplementary Fig. 1b) and expressed multiple pluripotency markers14,16, including nuclear transcription factors POU class 5 homeobox 1 (OCT3/4) and nanog homeobox (NANOG) as well as surface antigens SSEA3, SSEA4 and TRA-1-60 (Supplementary Fig. 1c). While a series of endogenous stemness genes, including OCT3/4, NANOG, SRY (sex determining region Y)-box 2 (SOX2), REX1 and telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT), were activated in hiPSCs, as revealed by quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) (Supplementary Fig. 2), and the three retroviral transgenes were silenced (Supplementary Fig. 3). Compared with the parental fibroblasts, hiPSCs displayed extensive demethylation of CpG dinucleotides in the OCT3/4 and NANOG promoters, as shown by bisulphite sequencing (Supplementary Fig. 4a). We also found that histone H3 lysine 4 was methylated and histone H3 was acetylated in the promoter regions of OCT3/4 and NANOG in hiPSCs (Supplementary Fig. 4b). Pluripotency of the hiPSC clones was confirmed in teratoma formation assays after injection of undifferentiated hiPSCs into immunocompromised NSG mice (Supplementary Fig. 5).
Generation of iPSC-derived EpSCs
CD200 and ITGA6 are known surface markers for hEpSCs within hair follicles8. To generate folliculogenic hEpSCs from hiPSCs, we first followed the prior keratinocyte differentiation protocols9,10,11,17. We monitored the temporal expression of CD200 and ITGA6 in differentiating hiPSCs using flow cytometric analysis and found that only a small percentage of cells expressing both CD200 and ITGA6 emerged after 11, 18 of 25 days of differentiation using these protocols (Fig. 1a,b). To generate a sufficient number of hEpSCs from hiPSCs, we tried different methods and found that timing of EGF in the culture medium was critical (Fig. 1b,c and Supplementary Fig. 6). Based on these results, we established a new sequential differentiation protocol that used retinoic acid to induce hiPSC to form ectodermal like cells (stage 1), which were then differentiated to form hEpSCs in the presence of BMP4 and EGF (stage 2), followed by the final expansion of the mature keratinocyte lineages in the presence of EGF alone (stage 3, Fig. 2a). The morphologies of the expected cell types at stages 2 and 3 were shown in Fig. 2b. Using this stage-defined differentiation protocol, we recapitulated the dynamic differentiation process from pluripotent stem cells to EpSCs and then to mature keratinocytes; thus capturing the EpSCs, a transient multipotent stem cell population in vitro. Using the sequential differentiation protocol, the CD200+/ITGA6+ cells emerged around day 11 after differentiation (Fig. 2f and Supplementary Fig. 6), and reached a maximum level of 26.8±3.0% around day 18 after differentiation (Fig. 2c,f and Supplementary Fig. 6). The appearance of KRT15-positive (KRT15+) cells, which reached 29.4%±4.0 by day 18 (Fig. 1d,g and Supplementary Fig. 7), closely paralleled the appearance of the CD200+/ITGA6+ population. We further analysed the percentage of CD200+/KRT15+, CD200+/keratin 14 (KRT14)-positive (KRT14+), KRT15+/ITGA6+, KRT14+/ITGA6+ and KRT15+/KRT14+ cell populations at day 18. The results demonstrated that these populations did not overlap completely (Supplementary Fig. 8). We analysed the percentage of KRT15+ and ITGB1+ expression among the CD200+/ITGA6+ cells. Similar to a prior study18, we found that only ~50% of CD200+/ITGA6+ cells expressed KRT15 (Supplementary Fig. 9). As expected from our prior experience with human EpSCs derived from hair follicles, the CD200+/ITGA6+ population was not stable in culture and their number decreased significantly after day 25 (Fig. 2f and Supplementary Fig. 6); whereas, KRT14+ mature keratinocytes increased steadily over time (Fig. 2e,h and Supplementary Fig. 10), indicating differentiation of hiPSC-derived CD200+/ITGA6+ cells to more mature keratinocytes. Correspondingly, flow cytometric analysis showed that the pluripotent stem cell (SSEA3+) population decreased progressively during differentiation (Supplementary Fig. 11).
We also analysed the temporal gene expression profile of the differentiating cultures and the results demonstrated a step-wise progression from embryonic immature cells (OCT3/4+ and NANOG+) to epithelial lineages, characterized by keratin 5 (KRT5) and keratin 8 (KRT8) expression, around 11 days after induction (Fig. 2i and Supplementary Fig. 12). The expression of keratinocyte-specific genes in the differentiating culture derived from hiPSCs increased over time, with concomitant decrease in OCT3/4 and NANOG expression (Fig. 2i and Supplementary Fig. 12). Consistent with flow cytometric analysis results, the expression of KRT15, began around day 11, peaked around day 18 and then decreased significantly by day 30 (Fig. 2i and Supplementary Fig. 12).
Characterization of iPSC-derived EpSCs in vitro
EpSCs are known to have high colony-forming efficiency3. We compared the colony-forming efficiency of unfractionated cells, CD200+/ITGA6+ cells, CD200−/ITGA6+ cells and CD200+/ITGA6− cells derived from hiPSCs at day 18 after differentiation; mature keratinocytes were derived from hiPSCs and normal keratinocytes from adult skin as previously described3. We found that CD200+/ITGA6+ cells derived from hiPSCs had the highest colony-forming efficiency among all the epithelial cells, as demonstrated by the higher number and larger size of colonies, compared with the other epithelial cell populations, after 3 weeks in culture (Fig. 3a and Supplementary Fig. 13). Nevertheless, the unfractionated cells formed the most colonies among all the cells tested and hiPSC-derived CD200+/ITGA6− cells formed a similar number of colonies to hiPSC-derived CD200+/ITGA6+ cells (Supplementary Fig. 13). CD200 has been recently reported to be expressed in hiPSCs and hESCs19. Our data confirmed the expression of CD200 in hiPSCs, and we found its expression later retained in a subpopulation of ITGA6+ cells as hiPSCs differentiated. Pluripotent stem cell markers, such as OCT3/4, NANOG and REX1, were barely detected in cells isolated at day 18 from the CD200+/ITGA6+ population (Fig. 3b), confirming that the hiPSC-derived CD200+/ITGA6+ cells contain few undifferentiated hiPSCs. However, hiPSC-derived CD200+/ITGA6− cells retained expression of ESC markers, including OCT3/4 and NANOG (Fig. 3b) with little expression of keratinocyte markers (Fig. 3c). The colony morphology formed by CD200+/ITGA6− cells was distinctively different from the colony morphology formed by CD200+/ITGA6+ cells (Fig. 3d) and unfractionated cells formed colonies with variable morphologies, supporting that CD200+/ITGA6− cells are non-epithelial cells.
Next, transcriptional analysis by qPCR showed that EpSC-specific network genes such as LGR5 (ref. 20), LGR6 (ref. 21), FZD2, TCF4, DKK3, CTNNB1, LEF1 and LHX2 (ref. 22) were activated in CD200+/ITGA6+ cells derived from hiPSCs and the expression levels were similar to hair follicles EpSCs (Fig. 4a). We also analysed these EpSC markers in iPSC-derived KRT14+/KRT15+/ITGA6+ cells, and the results showed that the levels of EpSC marker expression in these cells were similar to CD200+/ITGA6+ cells (Supplementary Fig. 14). Immunocytochemical staining analysis further confirmed the expression of KRT1, KRT10, KRT15 and ITGB1 expression in the hiPSC-derived CD200+/ITGA6+ cells (Fig. 4b–e), respectively; short-term culture of CD200+/ITGA6+ EpSCs isolated from human hair follicles was used as a control. To further compare the gene expression signature of EpSCs derived from hiPSCs to EpSCs derived from human hair follicles, we analysed global gene expression patterns of CD200+/ITGA6+ cells isolated from human fetal hair follicles, CD200+/ITGA6+ cells derived from hiPSCs and the parental hiPSCs. The results showed that hiPSC-derived CD200+/ITGA6+ cells clustered with CD200+/ITGA6+ cells isolated from fetal hair follicles, and were distinctively different from the parental hiPSCs as illustrated by unsupervised hierarchical clustering analysis (Fig. 4f,g). Notably, there was considerable overlap of genes between hiPSC-derived and hair follicle-derived CD200+/ITGA6+ cells (Fig. 4h), with many representative genes of epithelial lineages, such as KRT1, KRT8, KRT10, KRT15, ITGB1 and ITGA6 being highly enriched in the CD200+/ITGA6+ population compared with the parental hiPSCs and their expression levels were similar to EpSCs isolated from human hair follicles (Supplementary Fig. 15). Conversely, expression of the markers of ESCs, such as SOX2 and NANOG, decreased in the hiPSC-derived CD200+/ITGA6+ cell population (Fig. 4i). These findings indicate that the hiPSC-derived CD200+/ITGA6+ cells share similar molecular signatures with human EpSCs isolated from hair follicles.
Characterization of iPSC-derived EpSCs in vivo
EpSCs located in the bulge of the hair follicle have been documented to play a crucial role in hair follicle growth and cycling3,5. Although CD200 and ITGA6 are surface markers for human EpSCs8, it is unknown whether human CD200+/ITGA6+ cells isolated from adult scalp can form hair follicles in skin reconstitution assays. To determine whether hiPSC-derived EpSCs are multipotent and capable of generating all of the epithelial lineages within the skin, we first performed patch assays23,24 for skin reconstitution using day 18 hiPSC-derived CD200+/ITGA6+ cells, which were enriched by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) or magnetic bead selection. We found that the magnetic bead approach enabled isolation of large numbers of cells required for in vivo studies with minimal damage to the cells25. To minimize contamination of undifferentiated pluripotent stem cells and potential tumorigenesis26,27, we depleted potential remaining undifferentiated hiPSCs in the CD200+/ITGA6+ population using magnetic beads conjugated with antibody against the hiPSC membrane marker SSEA3. Neonatal foreskin keratinocytes were used as a positive control, whereas parental hiPSCs, hiPSC-derived CD200−/ITGA6+ cells at day 18, hiPSC-derived mature keratinocytes or mature keratinocytes isolated from hair bearing normal human skin were used as controls for comparison. The hiPSC-derived CD200+/ITGA6+ cells or control cells were combined with neonatal mouse dermal cells and injected subcutaneously into the back skin of immune-deficient nude mice. Two and half weeks later the skins of the mice were then excised and examined under a dissecting microscope. Hair follicle-like structures were observed from the underside of the skin (Fig. 5a and Supplementary Fig. 16). Histological analysis revealed that the injected epithelial cells aggregated to form small cystic spheres in the host subcutis. The cysts consisted of both basal keratinocytes and stratified epidermis (Fig. 5b). Hair follicles growing outward from the cyst were evident (Fig. 5b). This phenomenon was similar to what was observed previously in skin reconstitution assays using mouse EpSCs and neonatal dermal cells3,23,24. We also sorted out CD200+/ITGA6+ cells from day 11 and 25 cultures and these cells were also capable of forming hair follicles. The human origin of the epithelial cells in the new hair follicle structures and interfollicular epidermis was confirmed by DNA in situ hybridization with a human-specific Alu-repeat sequence probe (Fig. 5c). Double DNA in situ hybridization with human and mouse pan-centromeric probes further confirmed that the hair follicle epithelium and interfollicular epidermis were of human origin and the surrounding mesenchymal components were composed of mouse cells (Fig. 5d,e). The neonatal foreskin keratinocytes also formed hair follicles and we found that these cells contained distinct populations of CD200+/ITGA6+ or KRT15+ cells (Supplementary Fig. 17a). The qPCR results further confirmed that neonatal foreskin keratinocytes expressed EpSC markers but at a lower level compared with that of hiPSC-derived EpSCs (Supplementary Fig. 17b). The other controls including hiPSC-derived mature keratinocytes did not form any hair follicles and flow cytometric analysis showed that few CD200+/ITGA6+ or KRT15+ cells in the hiPSC-derived mature keratinocytes (Supplementary Fig. 17a). These data indicate that EpSCs are required for hair follicle formation.
To further confirm the folliculogenic capacity of hiPSCs-derived EpSCs, we performed a chamber-based skin reconstitution assay28,29 using hiPSC-derived EpSCs and neonatal mouse dermal cells. The hiPSC-derived EpSCs were mixed with C57BL/6 neonatal dermal fibroblasts in a chamber and transplanted onto mouse back skin. Three weeks later hair follicle-like structures were observed in the grafts (Fig. 5f and Supplementary Fig. 16). Histological examination showed large human-like hair follicles with hair shafts, which were distinctively different from mouse hair shafts in the grafts (Fig. 5f,g). Human-like multilayered epidermis was also formed in the grafts (Fig. 5h). The newly formed epidermis was impermeable to toluidine blue dye, indicating a functional skin barrier (Supplementary Fig. 18). Human origin of the epithelial cells in the hair follicles and epidermis was confirmed by DNA in situ hybridization with a human-specific Alu-repeat sequence probe (Fig. 5i,j).
Next, we performed immunostaining to characterize the hair follicles and epidermis originating from hiPSC-derived EpSCs. We found that KRT15 was expressed in the bulge region of the chimeric hair follicles (Fig. 6a, right panel), similar to hair follicles formed by neonatal foreskin keratinocytes (Fig. 6a, left panel). Other keratinocyte markers, such as KRT14, were detected in the outer root sheath of the chimeric hair follicles (Fig. 6b). H&E staining showed that the innermost regions of the chimeric hair follicle structures resembled the hair cortex and the medulla of mature human hair follicles (Fig. 6c–e). The formation of such structures were further confirmed by immunohistochemical staining for AE13, a marker for hair follicle cortex, and AE15, a marker for inner root sheath and medulla, in a pattern that is similar to normal human hair follicles (Fig. 6c,d and Supplementary Fig. 19a,b). We also found K75 expressed specifically in the companion layer of the chimeric hair follicle (Fig. 6e and Supplementary Fig. 19c). The hiPSC-derived CD200+/ITGA6+ cells not only reconstituted the epithelial components of the hair follicle but also the interfollicular epidermis. The multilayered interfollicular epidermis expressed KRT10 and involucrin (Fig. 6f,g). Our findings indicate that hiPSC-derived CD200+/ITGA6+ cells are capable of generating functional epidermis and they respond to inductive dermal signals to generate the epithelial component of hair follicles.
Sebocytes and mature keratinocytes from iPSC-derived EpSCs
To further define the differentiation capacity of hiPSC-derived CD200+/ITGA6+ cells, we cultured these cells under sebocyte differentiation conditions as previous described30. Three weeks after differentiation, some of the cells acquired abundant cytoplasm with oil droplets that were positive for oil red staining (Supplementary Fig. 20a). The sebocyte-like cells also expressed sebocyte markers, such as keratin 7 (KRT 7), peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPAR-α or PPARA) and lipoprotein lipase (LPL), as shown by qPCR (Supplementary Fig. 20b). To the contrary, hiPSC-derived mature keratinocytes could not be differentiated into sebocytes under the same condition. These results indicate that hiPSC-derived CD200+/ITGA6+ cells are capable of sebocyte differentiation. In order to generate mature keratinocytes from hiPSC-derived CD200+/ITGA6+ cells, the hiPSC-derived EpSCs were cultured for an additional 25 days in the presence of EGF until the KRT14+ keratinocytes population reached 98.8% purity as shown by flow cytometric analysis, whereas CD200+/ITGA6− cells cultured under the same conditions resulted in generating only 18.0% KRT14+ keratinocytes (Fig. 7a). Transcriptional analysis by qPCR showed that KRT14+ keratinocytes derived from hiPSC expressed a panel of epidermal genes similar to those of normal skin keratinocytes (Fig. 7b). Immunostaining analysis showed that most cells expressed mature squamous cell markers, such as keratin proteins (KRT14), p63, integrins (ITGA6 and ITGB4), pan-cytokeratin and E-cadherin (also known as CDH1) (Fig. 7c–g). We next generated 3D skin equivalents using keratinocytes from foreskin and mature keratinocytes from hiPSC-derived CD200+/ITGA6+ cells. The 3D skin equivalents exhibited a multilayered epidermis, expressing squamous differentiation markers such as KRT14 and KRT5, and also epithelial markers Pan-cytokeratin (Pan-CK) (Fig. 7h), in a pattern similar to skin equivalents formed by foreskin keratinocytes. These data support that hiPSC-derived CD200+/ITGA6+ cells are multipotent. However, surprisingly, we were not able to identify human sebaceous glands derived from the hiPSC-derived CD200+/ITGA6+ cells or neonatal foreskin keratinocytes in the skin reconstitution assays. It is well known that mouse EpSCs (CD34+/ITGA6+ or KRT15high/ITGA6+) are capable of regenerating both follicular epithelium and sebaceous units in the skin reconstitute assays3,31. These results suggest that hiPSC-derived CD200+/ITGA6+ cells, although folliculogenic and sharing molecular signatures similar to those of human EpSCs, are likely more restricted in their lineage potential compared with EpSCs or they may require additional signals for sebocyte differentiation in vivo.
In this study, we present a method to differentiate hiPSCs into functional EpSCs that are capable of reconstituting the epithelial components of the hair follicle and interfollicular epidermis in the skin regeneration assays. Since human hair follicle cycling lasts for years, it is not possible to study human hair follicle cycling using the xenograft models, and thus it is difficult to assess the long-term renewal of the transplanted hiPSC-derived EpSCs. It is interesting that at day 18 after differentiation, numbers of Lrig1+/ITGA6+ cells, Lrg6+/ITGA6+ cells or MTS24+/ITGA6+ cells are also present in the culture (Supplementary Fig. 21). Although the function of these human cell populations is unknown, the different epidermal lineages after CD200+/ITGA6+ cells grafting may arise from multipotent stem cell population and potentially different unipotent stem cell populations.
Previous study demonstrated that mouse iPSC-derived multipotent keratinocytes induced by BMP4 can reconstitute normal skin and its appendages in an in vivo assay32. Veraitch et al.33 used a similar protocol and they found that the hiPSC-derived ectodermal precursor cells emerging at day 11 contributed to hair follicle morphogenesis. However, it was unclear from the study which cell population in the ectodermal cells contributed to folliculogenesis, and the hair shaft shown in the study appeared to be of mouse origin. The authors suggest that low frequency of human-derived cells in the hair follicles observed in their study implied that these cells contribute to hair follicle morphogenesis via direct repopulation and non-cell autonomous activities33. We observed only small percentage of CD200+/ITGA6+ cells at day 11 when we tested a similar protocol without using EGF, and >30% of the cells retained expression of SSEA3 (Supplementary Fig. 22), which are undifferentiated and potentially tumorigenic iPSCs. We depleted SSEA3+ cells before in vivo reconstitution assays. More importantly, hiPSC-derived EpSCs are capable of re-establishing the hair follicle bulge region with KRT15+ cells in our work.
In conclusion, we developed a novel hiPSC differentiation method that efficiently differentiates hiPSCs to EpSCs, and these CD200+/ITGA6+ cells have similar molecular characteristics of hEpSCs. The hiPSC-derived CD200+/ITGA6+ cells isolated by magnetic beads provide a simple approach for generating highly enriched populations of folliculogenic human cells that can reconstitute the hair follicle epithelial components and interfollicular epidermis in vivo. Our study establishes a means for obtaining a scalable source of human EpSCs, which is a major step toward developing cell-based treatments for hair loss and other skin disorders. However, the current protocol to obtain hiPSC-derived EpSCs is not FDA-friendly and will need to be thoroughly validated. Nevertheless, access to cells with cardinal features of hEpSCs opens new possibilities for studying regenerative therapies for hair loss, wound healing and ageing skin.
Human primary fibroblasts were obtained from discarded normal skin after surgery following a protocol approved by the University of Pennsylvania Institutional Review Board. HEK 293T cells and human fibroblasts were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 2 mM L-glutamine, 100 unit per ml penicillin and 100 μg per ml of streptomycin (all from Invitrogen). The hiPSCs were cultured on MEF feeders using hESC culture medium that contains 80% DMEM/F12 (1:1) medium, 20% knockout Serum Replacement, 100 μM non-essential amino acids, 2 mM L-glutamine, 0.1 mM β-mercaptoethanol, 100 unit per ml penicillin, 100 μg per ml streptomycin and 10–15 ngper ml bFGF (all from Invitrogen).
hiPSC generation with retroviral infection
To prepare the retroviruses, HEK 293T cells were transfected with pMXs plasmids containing the coding sequences for SOX2, OCT3/4, and KLF4, along with pUMVC and pCMV-VSV-G plasmids at the ratio of 10 μg of plasmid DNA to 20 μl of Fugene 6 (Roche) in 500 μl Opi-MEM (Invitrogen). The ratio of pMXs:pUMVC:pCMV-VSV-G was 3:2:1. Next day, the culture medium containing the retroviruses was harvested and concentrated by Retro-X Concentrator (TAKARA). The human fibroblasts were plated at 1 × 105 cells per well in the six-well plate 1 day before infecting with the retroviruses. The retrovirus solution was added to the fibroblasts and incubated overnight. Twenty four hours after the infection, infected fibroblasts were plated in gelatin-coated 100-mm dishes containing irradiated feeder cells. One day after plating on feeder cells, the medium was changed to hESC culture medium. hESC-like clones were observed 25–30 days after the initial infection. The hiPSC clones were picked up ~45 days after the initial infection. Eight lines of hiPSC were established from eight different donors and used in the subsequent experiments.
Characterization of hiPSCs
We performed reverse transcription reactions using SuperScript III First-Strand Synthesis kit (Invitrogen). PCR was done with PCR Master Mix (Promega). The primer sets used for RT–PCR are listed in Supplementary Table 1. Alkaline phosphatase detection kit (Sigma) was used to detect alkaline phosphatase activity. Bisulphite genomic sequencing was performed using the CpGenome modification kit (Millipore) according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. Amplified products were cloned into pCR2.1-TOPO (Invitrogen). Ten randomly selected colonies were sequenced with the M13 forward and M13 reverse primers for each gene14,16,34. Sequencing was performed at the University of Pennsylvania sequencing facility. For histone modification, 107 hiPSCs, hESCs or hFs were fixed with 1% formaldehyde for 10 min and then lysed in 1 ml lysis buffer (50 mM Tris–HCl, pH 8.0, 10 mM EDTA, 1% SDS, and protease inhibitors) for 20 min on ice. The lysate was split into three tubes and sonicated. After 10 min centrifugation, the supernatant was pre-cleared for 4 h at 4 °C with agarose beads and normal IgG in IP buffer (50 mM Tris–HCl (pH 8.0), 150 mM NaCl, 2 mM EDTA, 1% NP-40, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS and protease inhibitors). A total of 100 ul of pre-cleared chromatin per reaction diluted in 1 ml IP buffer in the presence of 20 ug antibody was used for each immunoprecipitation reaction according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The antibodies used for this study were anti-acH3 (Millipore), anti-dimethyl K4 of H3 (Millipore) and normal rabbit IgG (Sigma). The precipitate was purified and analysed by qPCR using Bio Rad SYBR Green qPCR Master Mix14,16,34. For teratoma formation, 106 hiPSCs were injected into the flank of NSG mice (The Jackson Laboratory). The tumours were examined histologically for the presence of different lineages of cells.
Differentiation of hiPSCs into CD200+/ITGA6+ cells and keratinocytes
Prior to differentiation, the cells were feeder-depleted by culturing on a thin layer of matrigel (BD Biosciences) in hESC medium for 24 to 48 h. For differentiation, cells were dissociated to small clusters (10–20 cells) with collagenase IV (1 mg ml−1, Invitrogen) for 20 min followed by trypsin-EDTA (0.05%) for ~2 min. The clusters were washed and cultured in the six-well low-cluster plate (Corning) in 2 ml hESC medium containing Y27632 without bFGF to form embryoid bodies. Embryoid bodies were seeded onto mitomycin-C-treated 3T3 fibroblasts in differentiation medium. Cells were grown in the differentiation medium until clones of epithelial cells were observed and isolated around day 11. The epithelial cells were plated and cultured on 3T3 fibroblasts again until the population of CD200+/ITGA6+ cells reached their maximum level around day 18. The CD200+/ITGA6+ cells were sorted out and cultured in the differentiation medium containing EGF. The characteristic mature keratinocytes were obtained by day 40 after the differentiation. For differentiation to the epithelial lineage, the following molecules were used: days 0–1, BMP4 (1 ng ml−1, R&D system); days 1–11, all-trans RA (1 μM, Sigma-Aldrich); days 3–11, BMP4 (25 ng ml−1), EGF (20 ng ml−1, R&D system); days 11–25, BMP4 (1 ng ml−1), EGF (20 ng ml−1); days 25 and after, EGF (20 ng ml−1). Initiation medium (3:1 mixture of DMEM and Ham’s F12 medium with 2% FBS, 5 μg ml−1 insulin, 0.5 μg ml−1 hydrocortisone, 10−10 mol l−1 cholera toxin, 1.37 ng ml−1 triiodothyronine, 0.3 mmol l−1 L-ascorbic acid and 24 μg ml−1 adenine) was used at day 1–7. Induced medium 1 (Defined Keratinocyte-SFM (Invitrogen) with 5 μg ml−1 insulin, 0.2 μg ml−1 hydrocortisone, 10−10 mol l−1 cholera toxin, 1.37 ng ml−1 triiodothyronine, 0.3 mmol l−1 L-ascorbic and 10 μg ml−1 adenine) was used at day 8–11. Induced medium 2 (1:1 mixture of Keratinocyte-SFM (Invitrogen) and Defined Keratinocyte-SFM) was used at day 11–25. Induced medium 3 (Keratinocyte-SFM) was used after day 25.
Flow cytometry and cell sorting
Cells were stained at a concentration of 2.5 × 106 cells per ml with antibodies against CD200, ITGA6, SSEA3, KRT14 and KRT15. For cell-surface markers, staining was carried out in PBS with 2% FBS. For intracellular proteins, staining was carried out on cells fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (Electron Microscopy Sciences) in PBS. Staining was done in PBS with 2% FBS. Stained cells were analysed using an LSRII flow cytometer (BD Biosciences). For FACS, the cells were sorted at a concentration of 106 cells per ml in PBS/2% FBS using a FACS AriaTMII cell sorter (BD Biosciences). For magnetic bead sorting, the Miltenyi MACS bead sorting system was used according to the manufacturer’s guidelines and sorting conditions. Data were analysed using FlowJo software (Treestar). A comprehensive list of antibodies is described in Supplementary Table 2.
Patch assay for skin reconstitution
hiPSC-derived CD200+/ITGA6+/SSEA3− cells were isolated and combined with freshly isolated dermal cells from neonatal mice. In all experiments, approximately equal numbers of epithelial and dermal cells (1 million each) were combined at a concentration of 104 cells per μl in DMEM/F12 and injected subcutaneously into immune-compromised NU/NU nude mouse. The animal protocol has been approved by the University of Pennsylvania Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Two and a half weeks after implantation, the mice were killed and the subcutaneous growths were dissected and processed for histology and immunohistochemistry analysis. A comprehensive list of antibodies is provided in Supplementary Table 2. Appropriate Alexa488 or Alexa590 -conjugated secondary antibodies (Molecular Probes) were used with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) nuclear counterstain (Vector lab). Patch assays using hiPSC-EpSCs and various controls were repeated independently for seven times in 20 mice.
Chamber assay for skin reconstitution
The cellular grafting procedure for hair follicle reconstitution in vivo was performed28,29,35. Briefly, hiPSC-derived EpSCs and mouse neonatal dermal cells (5 million each) were resuspended individually or mixed together in the medium and were then transferred to grafting chambers implanted on the back skins of immune-compromised NU/NU Nude mouse. The chambers were removed 1 week after grafting, and hair follicle formation was assessed at 3–4 weeks. Part of each grafting site was dissected for histological observation. The assays were repeated three times.
Skin permeability assay
The reconstituted skin were rinsed in PBS and immersed in methanol successively; they were then rehydrated in PBS and stained in 0.1% toluidine blue, which was resolved in H2O or DMSO for 10 min at room temperature. They were briefly washed in PBS and were immediately photographed.
Global gene profiling and array analysis
RNA from hiPSCs, hEpSCs and hiPSCs-EpSCs was isolated. Profiling study was performed using human whole-genome expression chips (Illumina) at the Wistar Institute microarray core. Microarray raw data generated from Illumina Chip were normalized, background-corrected and summarized using the R package ‘lumi’36. To reduce false positives, the unexpressed probes were removed, leaving 21,758 probes that were examined in all experiments described herein. The R package ‘limma’37,38 was employed for gene differentially expression analysis, followed by multiple test correction by the Benjamini and Hochberg procedure39. The genes with the adjusted P-values <0.05 and fold change >4 were subjected to two-way clustering analysis for generating the heat map.
In situ hybridization
Briefly, paraffin slides were dehydrated, antigen retrieved and hybridized with Alu DNA probe (BioGenex); the slide was heated to 85 °C for 10 min and then 37 °C overnight. The slides were then incubated with antibody specific for fluorescein, biotin-labelled (BioGenex) and finally incubated with secondary antibody labelled with Streptavidin–Alexa Fluo488. DAPI was used to label the nuclear DNA.
Student’s t-test or ANOVA was used to analyse gene expression and flow cytometric data. qPCR data were analysed after being normalized for β-actin loading control. Statistical significance was determined if two-sided P <0.05.
Accession Codes: Microarray data has been deposited in Gene Expression Omnibus under accession number GSE51028.
How to cite this article: Yang, R. et al. Generation of folliculogenic human epithelial stem cells from induced pluripotent stem cells. Nat. Comm. 5:3071 doi: 10.1038/ncomms4071 (2014).
Gene Expression Omnibus
Cherry, A. B. & Daley, G. Q. Reprogrammed cells for disease modeling and regenerative medicine. Annu. Rev. Med. 64, 277–290 (2013).
Cherry, A. B. & Daley, G. Q. Reprogramming cellular identity for regenerative medicine. Cell 148, 1110–1122 (2012).
Morris, R. J. et al. Capturing and profiling adult hair follicle stem cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 22, 411–417 (2004).
Ito, M. et al. Wnt-dependent de novo hair follicle regeneration in adult mouse skin after wounding. Nature 447, 316–320 (2007).
Cotsarelis, G., Sun, T. T. & Lavker, R. M. Label-retaining cells reside in the bulge area of pilosebaceous unit: implications for follicular stem cells, hair cycle, and skin carcinogenesis. Cell 61, 1329–1337 (1990).
Lyle, S. et al. Human hair follicle bulge cells are biochemically distinct and possess an epithelial stem cell phenotype. J. Investig. Dermatol. Symp. Proc. 4, 296–301 (1999).
Lyle, S. et al. The C8/144B monoclonal antibody recognizes cytokeratin 15 and defines the location of human hair follicle stem cells. J. Cell Sci. 111, (Pt 21),3179–3188 (1998).
Ohyama, M. et al. Characterization and isolation of stem cell-enriched human hair follicle bulge cells. J. Clin. Invest. 116, 249–260 (2006).
Metallo, C. M., Ji, L., de Pablo, J. J. & Palecek, S. P. Retinoic acid and bone morphogenetic protein signaling synergize to efficiently direct epithelial differentiation of human embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells 26, 372–380 (2008).
Guenou, H. et al. Human embryonic stem-cell derivatives for full reconstruction of the pluristratified epidermis: a preclinical study. Lancet 374, 1745–1753 (2009).
Itoh, M., Kiuru, M., Cairo, M. S. & Christiano, A. M. Generation of keratinocytes from normal and recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa-induced pluripotent stem cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 8797–8802 (2011).
Draheim, K. M. & Lyle, S. Epithelial stem cells. Methods Mol. Biol. 750, 261–274 (2011).
Takahashi, K. & Yamanaka, S. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell 126, 663–676 (2006).
Takahashi, K. et al. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factors. Cell 131, 861–872 (2007).
Nakagawa, M. et al. Generation of induced pluripotent stem cells without Myc from mouse and human fibroblasts. Nat. Biotechnol. 26, 101–106 (2008).
Park, I. H. et al. Reprogramming of human somatic cells to pluripotency with defined factors. Nature 451, 141–146 (2008).
Nissan, X. et al. Functional melanocytes derived from human pluripotent stem cells engraft into pluristratified epidermis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 14861–14866 (2011).
Garza, L. A. et al. Bald scalp in men with androgenetic alopecia retains hair follicle stem cells but lacks CD200-rich and CD34-positive hair follicle progenitor cells. J. Clin. Invest. 121, 613–622 (2011).
Tang, C. et al. An antibody against SSEA-5 glycan on human pluripotent stem cells enables removal of teratoma-forming cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 29, 829–834 (2011).
Jaks, V. et al. Lgr5 marks cycling, yet long-lived, hair follicle stem cells. Nat. Genet. 40, 1291–1299 (2008).
Snippert, H. J. et al. Lgr6 marks stem cells in the hair follicle that generate all cell lineages of the skin. Science 327, 1385–1389 (2010).
Janich, P. et al. The circadian molecular clock creates epidermal stem cell heterogeneity. Nature 480, 209–214 (2011).
Zheng, Y. et al. Organogenesis from dissociated cells: generation of mature cycling hair follicles from skin-derived cells. J. Invest. Dermatol. 124, 867–876 (2005).
Zheng, Y. et al. Mature hair follicles generated from dissociated cells: a universal mechanism of folliculoneogenesis. Dev. Dyn. 239, 2619–2626 (2010).
Dubois, N. C. et al. SIRPA is a specific cell-surface marker for isolating cardiomyocytes derived from human pluripotent stem cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 29, 1011–1018 (2011).
Ghosh, Z. et al. Dissecting the oncogenic and tumorigenic potential of differentiated human induced pluripotent stem cells and human embryonic stem cells. Cancer. Res. 71, 5030–5039 (2011).
Tong, M. et al. Mice generated from tetraploid complementation competent iPS cells show similar developmental features as those from ES cells but are prone to tumorigenesis. Cell. Res. 21, 1634–1637 (2011).
Ehama, R. et al. Hair follicle regeneration using grafted rodent and human cells. J. Invest. Dermatol. 127, 2106–2115 (2007).
Lichti, U., Anders, J. & Yuspa, S. H. Isolation and short-term culture of primary keratinocytes, hair follicle populations and dermal cells from newborn mice and keratinocytes from adult mice for in vitro analysis and for grafting to immunodeficient mice. Nat. Protoc. 3, 799–810 (2008).
Roh, C. et al. Multi-potentiality of a new immortalized epithelial stem cell line derived from human hair follicles. In Vitro Cell Dev. Biol. Anim. 44, 236–244 (2008).
Trempus, C. S. et al. Enrichment for living murine keratinocytes from the hair follicle bulge with the cell surface marker CD34. J. Invest. Dermatol. 120, 501–511 (2003).
Bilousova, G., Chen, J. & Roop, D. R. Differentiation of mouse induced pluripotent stem cells into a multipotent keratinocyte lineage. J. Invest. Dermatol. 131, 857–864 (2011).
Veraitch, O. et al. Human Induced pluripotent stem cell-derived ectodermal precursor cells contribute to hair follicle morphogenesis in vivo. J. Invest. Dermatol. (2013).
Yang, R. et al. Generation of melanocytes from induced pluripotent stem cells. J. Invest. Dermatol. 131, 2458–2466 (2011).
Kishimoto, J. et al. Selective activation of the versican promoter by epithelial- mesenchymal interactions during hair follicle development. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 7336–7341 (1999).
Du, P., Kibbe, W. A. & Lin, S. M. lumi: a pipeline for processing Illumina microarray. Bioinformatics 24, 1547–1548 (2008).
Smyth, G. K. Linear models and empirical bayes methods for assessing differential expression in microarray experiments. Stat. Appl. Genet. Mol. Biol. 3,, Article 3 (2004).
Smyth, G. K. Limma: linear models for microarray data. In:Bioinformatics and Computational Biology Solutions using R and Bioconductor eds Gentleman R. V., Carey S. D., Irizarry R., Huber W. Springer (2005).
Benjamini, Y. & Hochberg, Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B 57, 289–300 (1995).
We gratefully acknowledge the histology laboratory at the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine for assistance in histological studies, Penn Flow Cytometry Facility and the Cooperative Human Tissue Network. This research was supported by the US National Institutes of Health grant R01-AR054593, P30-AR057217.
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
About this article
Cite this article
Yang, R., Zheng, Y., Burrows, M. et al. Generation of folliculogenic human epithelial stem cells from induced pluripotent stem cells. Nat Commun 5, 3071 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms4071
This article is cited by
Stem Cell Research & Therapy (2022)
Nature Protocols (2022)
Cell Death Discovery (2022)
LGR5 is a conserved marker of hair follicle stem cells in multiple species and is present early and throughout follicle morphogenesis
Scientific Reports (2022)
Cell and Tissue Research (2021)