Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

The discovery of kimberlites in Antarctica extends the vast Gondwanan Cretaceous province


Kimberlites are a volumetrically minor component of the Earth’s volcanic record, but are very important as the major commercial source of diamonds and as the deepest samples of the Earth’s mantle. They were predominantly emplaced from ≈2,100 Ma to ≈10 ka ago, into ancient, stable regions of continental crust (cratons), but are also known from continental rifts and mobile belts. Kimberlites have been reported from almost all major cratons on all continents except for Antarctica. Here we report the first bona fide Antarctic kimberlite occurrence, from the northern Prince Charles Mountains, emplaced during the reactivation of the Lambert Graben associated with rifting of India from Australia-Antarctica. The samples are texturally, mineralogically and geochemically typical of Group I kimberlites from more classical localities. Their 120 Ma ages overlap with those of many kimberlites from other world-wide localities, extending a vast Cretaceous, Gondwanan kimberlite province, for the first time, into Antarctica.


Kimberlites are rare, highly silica-undersaturated, mantle-derived igneous rocks, which have been emplaced into the crust, particularly in ancient and geologically stable cratons. Their trace element enrichments, small volumes, low silica but highly magnesian and volatile (C–H–O)-rich character argue that they represent melt compositions formed in the presence of H2O and CO2, very close to the carbonate–peridotite solidus1,2,3. The occasional but scientifically and commercially highly significant presence of diamonds suggests that they originated by partial melting of the mantle at extreme depths (>150 km), and some kimberlites (that is, those transporting diamonds with inclusions representing rare transition zone and lower mantle mineral phases) are the most deeply derived materials accessible on Earth. Kimberlites were emplaced over a significant period of geological history, ranging in age from the Palaeoproterozoic to the Cenozoic Eras, and have been reported on all continents except Antarctica4,5.

Here we present mineralogical and geochemical data from three new kimberlite samples obtained from the southeastern slopes of Mt Meredith in the northern Prince Charles Mountains (nPCM) of Antarctica. These rocks represent the first reported occurrence of genuine kimberlite in Antarctica.


Sample locations and petrography and mineralogy

The location from which the samples were recovered is shown in Fig. 1. One sample (77063) was obtained in situ from an outcrop, and the others (77081 and 77082) were recovered from boulders in till several metres from the outcrop. The three samples are classified as Group I kimberlites on the basis of petrography and mineral chemistry. They are strongly porphyritic with rounded to euhedral olivine crystals up to several millimetres across and rare phlogopite macrocrysts in a very fine-grained groundmass. Olivine crystals are partially replaced by serpentine on rims and along fractures (Fig. 2a, b), but all samples retain abundant fresh olivine. Most olivine crystals are rounded to euhedral in shape and up to 200 μm across. Others are larger (>1 mm across) and irregular in shape, and sometimes contain inclusions of phlogopite, orthopyroxene, Cr-diopside-rich clinopyroxene, perovskite and Cr-spinel (Fig. 2c). Olivine crystals vary significantly in major and minor element compositions (from Fo74 to Fo91; 0.02–0.45 wt% NiO and 0.10–0.50 wt% CaO). In some cases, they are interpreted as xenocrysts of lithospheric material rather than as phenocrysts. For example, one large olivine crystal has an embayed and resorbed core of Fo90.5 olivine overgrown by a thin rim of Fo88 olivine. The core contains separate inclusions of Cr- and Na-rich clinopyroxene as well as low Al and Ca orthopyroxene, which are compositionally similar to peridotitic phases from the upper mantle. Phlogopite macrocrysts can be up to several millimetres in length and are irregular to tabular in shape. Phlogopite Mg# [100*Mg/(Mg+∑Fe)] varies from 87.3 to 93.4. Representative mineral compositions are presented in Table 1

Figure 1: Localities of 120 Ma old Gondwanan kimberlites.
figure 1

(a) Reconstruction of Gondwana at ~120 Ma (adapted from Veevers et al.40). The nPCM kimberlite occurrence is marked as a red dot. Other Cretaceous Gondwanan kimberlites5,27,30,31,32,33,41,42 are shown as smaller green dots surrounded by a dashed line, broadly defining a vast Gondwanan, Cretaceous kimberlite province, which is extended into Antarctica by the newly discovered nPCM kimberlites; (b) Enlargement of the area surrounding the nPCM kimberlite localities, showing the location of samples 77063, 77081 and 77082 from Mt Meredith (red/white cross). When combined with the locations of nearby Cretaceous alkaline ultramafic and mafic rocks and carbonatites9,10,15 (blue/white crosses), they form a linear feature parallel to the Lambert Graben, in which the Lambert Glacier flows. The length of the scale bar in b is 50 km.

Figure 2: Petrographic features of the Antarctic kimberlites.
figure 2

(ac) Plain light photomicrographs of the Antarctic kimberlites (a,b and c – samples 77081, 77063 and 77082, respectively) showing porphyritic texture and olivine alignment. Olivine (ol) crystals are set in a fine- to coarse-grained groundmass, consisting of phlogopite (phl), calcite (cc), perovskite (pr), apatite and magnetite. Scale bar is 2 mm long in a and b and 20 μm long in c. (d) Backscattered electron image of zoned olivine crystal with euhedral inclusions of high-Ca (cpx; upper left insert) and low-Ca (opx; lower right insert) pyroxenes in the resorbed core (sample 77082). Scale bar is 100 μm long in the main panel, 10 μm long in the upper left insert and 30 μm long in the lower right insert.

Table 1 Representative electronprobe microanalyzer analyses of phases in the three samples.

The fine-grained groundmass is mainly composed of calcite, olivine, phlogopite, magnesiochromite, Ti-magnetite, perovskite and apatite (Fig. 2c). Spinel exhibits distinctive atoll structures, in which euhedral cores of compositionally zoned magnesiochromite are surrounded by concentrically arranged zones of silicate material, which are in turn surrounded by magnetite. Very similar atoll spinels have been reported in other kimberlites6. Perovskite crystals are up to 100 μm across and perfectly octahedral (Fig. 2c). They formed in the groundmass and are also included in some olivine rims. Abundant anhedral calcite crystallized interstitially to other groundmass phases and makes up 10–12 modal% of the rocks. The association of xenocrystic and phenocrystic olivine and phlogopite macrocrysts set in a matrix containing perovskite, spinel, apatite and carbonate is a distinctive feature of kimberlites4,7. Notably, clinopyroxene does not occur as phenocrysts nor in the groundmass, precluding classification of these samples as ultramafic lamprophyres (UML)8, examples of which have been reported from other localities in the nPCM region9,10,11,12.

Whole rock geochemistry

The rocks are ultrabasic (29.2 to 32.1 wt% SiO2) and have high MgO (19.1–27.3 wt%), CaO (10.9–28.8 wt%), CaO/Al2O3 (2.7–2.9) and CO2 (5.3–9.0 wt%), but low Al2O3 contents (3.8–6.5 wt%), reflecting the observed olivine- and calcite-rich mineralogy. Large ranges in K2O (1.3–2.8 wt%) and P2O5 (0.59–0.89 wt%) contents mainly reflect varying modal abundances of phlogopite and apatite, respectively. Na2O contents are very low (<0.15 wt%). On a plot of bulk SiO2/MgO versus MgO/CaO (Fig. 3a), the samples lie within a field of representative kimberlites6. Mesozoic UML from nearby Beaver Lake12 have higher SiO2/MgO values (≥2) and are mostly outside the kimberlite field.

Figure 3: Whole rock geochemical characteristics of the Antarctic kimberlites.
figure 3

(a) Plot of whole-rock SiO2/MgO versus MgO/CaO for the samples 77081, 77063 and 77082 (red dots) compared with Mitchell’s6 field for representative, average kimberlites (dark grey shading), for extreme kimberlite compositions (light grey shading) and the UML from nearby Beaver Lake (Jetty Peninsula)12 (blue diamonds). (b) Primitive-mantle normalized13, extended trace element plot of the three nPCM kimberlites (77081, black circles; 77063, white circles; and 77082, grey circles) compared with the range of values from a representative suite of 167 kimberlites from Africa (pink), Canada (yellow), Greenland (grey), India (indigo) and Siberia (green)43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51.

Incompatible trace element concentrations tend to be high (generally >100 × Primitive Mantle13 or more). For example, Rare Earth Element (REE) patterns are strongly light REE-enriched ([La/Yb]n=74–136), similar to kimberlites from other continents. K, Pb, Zr, Hf and Ti are depleted relative to trace elements of similar incompatibility (La, Ce, Sm, Eu and Gd) (Fig. 3b). The abundances of all measured incompatible trace elements and the general form of the Primitive Mantle normalized patterns match very closely kimberlites from other world-wide localities (Fig. 3b). Full whole rock analyses for the current samples are reported in Table 2.

Table 2 Whole rock major and minor element analyses determined by XRF and trace element analyses determined by ICP-MS.

Radiometric ages of the samples

Perovskite U–Pb dating by the laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) method yielded apparent ages of 113±13 Ma (2σ) (77063), 125±8 Ma (77081) and 121±13 Ma (77082, see Methods section U–Pb LA-ICP-MS dating of perovskite). Assuming the perovskites are coeval, we obtain a weighted age of 122±6 Ma. This is supported by a 117±1 Ma Rb–Sr age for phlogopite from 77063 (Table 4). On the basis of these ages, it is likely that that samples 77081 and 77082, from boulders within till are related in terms of age, to the kimberlite from which 77063 was sampled. An origin from the same kimberlite pipe, however, is unlikely given the diversity in initial Sr, Nd, Hf and Pb isotope ratios (87Sr/86Sr 0.7042−0.7054, εNd +1.9 to −2.1, εHf +4.6 to −5.5, 206Pb/204Pb 18.04−18.42, see Tables 3, 4, 5). The bulk rock 87Sr/86Sr for 77063 (0.7054±1) is supported by in situ Sr isotope data for perovskite (0.70539±12, see Supplementary Fig. S1). These radiogenic isotope signatures are intermediate between those established for Group I and transitional kimberlites from southern Africa14.

Table 4 Rb–Sr dating of 77063 PHLOG.
Table 3 Rb–Sr and Sm–Nd isotope results.
Table 5 Lu–Hf and U–Pb isotope results.


Ultramafic–mafic alkaline, carbonatitic and kimberlite-like rocks of similar age have been reported from elsewhere in the nPCM region, including Else Platform, Radok Lake and on the Fischer Massif, adjacent to the Lambert rift9,10,15. These rocks were classified as UML (alnöites), alkaline picrites, ultrabasic foidites, trachybasalts and carbonatite–kimberlites. In particular, Egorov et al.16 reported the ‘first Antarctic occurrence of a dike kimberlite’ in the nPCM, inferred to be Early Cretaceous in age. However, samples from this dyke are significantly different from the current samples in that olivine macrocrysts (containing mantle-derived clinopyroxene and orthopyroxene inclusions – Fig. 2d), garnet xenocrysts, ilmenite and perovskite are not reported. However, globular ‘syngenetic calcite carbonatite schlieren’ were present. In addition, the dyke is compositionally outside the range for kimberlites with low MgO (17 wt%) and Ni (480 ppm), reflecting the low modal olivine. We argue that this dyke is not a bona fide kimberlite, but more akin to a carbonatite magma that fractionated into a calcite-rich component and an apatite+magnetite+olivine component.

The bona fide kimberlites described here and the other nPCM ultrabasic rock correlates appear to define a N–S linear feature extending 150 km along the margin of the Lambert rift (Fig. 1b). Interestingly, the UML occur in the northern part of the region (mainly around Beaver Lake)9,10,11,12, whereas the current kimberlites and the carbonatite–kimberlite reported by Belyatsky et al.15 occur in the southern part. This may reflect progressive stages of development of the Lambert rift, with the UML representing a greater extent of rifting in the north, more erosion of the base of the lithosphere leading to melting at shallower subcontinental lithospheric levels, relative to the kimberlites in the south. Similar models have been suggested in the Ailik Bay rift17, and in the currently active rift in the western branch of the East African Rift system18.

Kimberlites and related alkaline igneous rocks occur in all major Gondwanan continents (Africa, India, South America and Australia), but have not previously been reported from Antarctica. Kimberlite emplacement ages show well-developed clustering throughout the Mesoproterozoic, early Paleozoic, Mesozoic and Cenozoic5. In the Mesozoic, major emplacement events occurred 240, 145, 120, 85 and 73 Ma ago. The ca. 120 Ma episode was distributed particularly widely across the Gondwanan continents, and discovery of 120 Ma kimberlites in East Antarctica further extends this vast Cretaceous kimberlite province (Fig. 1a).

At 120 Ma India and amalgamated Antarctica-Australia had already begun to drift apart, with early sea-floor spreading forming the proto-Indian Ocean19. The graben, on the margin of which the current kimberlites were emplaced, is a 700 km long zone of thinned continental crust believed to represent either a failed, trans-tensional basin that was activated 120 Ma ago during early extension associated with break-up of India and Antarctica-Australia20,21, or an accommodation zone related to a Carboniferous-Permian intracontinental rift between India and Antarctica, which was reactivated in the Cretaceous during continental dispersion22. Whichever the case, the nPCM kimberlites (and related alkali rocks of similar age at nearby locations10,12,15Fig. 1) are most likely a magmatic expression of reactivation of pre-existing lithospheric discontinuities associated with the Lambert Graben during opening of the proto-Indian ocean. Kent23 reported orangeites of age 109–116 Ma peripheral to the Bay of Bengal, India (Damodar Valley), which may relate to the same Cretaceous kimberlite province. Jelsma et al.5 have shown that the time intervals in which kimberlite emplacement events were concentrated, coincided with fundamental plate reorganizations, such as supercontinent break-up. Thus, as well as constituting the first-known bona fide Antarctic kimberlite occurrence, the location of the nPCM kimberlites is consistent with models relating kimberlite distribution to reactivation of major trans-lithospheric structures during continental scale tectonic events5, and likely marks the onset of the reactivation of continental rifting zones, that is, similar to suggestions for other rift-related continental mantle-derived magmas such as carbonatites, UML and kamafugites (this study and refs 17, 18). Thus, the Antarctic kimberlites and previously reported UML as well as other alkaline volcanics in the nPCM region potentially provide rare insights into large-scale tectonic mantle processes during the Cretaceous.


Electronprobe microanalysis

Constituent mineral phases in the samples were analysed for major and minor elements using a Cameca SX-50 WDS electronprobe microanalyser at Macquarie University. The accelerating voltage was 15 kV and beam current was 20 nA. Count times varied from 20 s on major elements to 60 s on minor elements. Calibration was performed on natural mineral standards. Representative data is presented in Table 1.

X-ray fluorescence analysis

Whole rock major and minor element abundances were determined on powdered samples using X-ray fluorescence (XRF) microscopy, at Macquarie University (Table 2).

Solution – ICP-MS analysis

Trace element abundances in the chilled margins were measured by solution – ICP-MS at the Australian National University (ANU) following procedures similar to those described by Norman et al.24 (Table 2).

Isotopic analyses

Rb–Sr and Sm–Nd isotope analyses were performed on leachate–residue pairs. Sample 77063 (105 mg, fine crush) was leached with cold 2M HCl (12 h), whereas rock powders for 77081A and 77082A were leached with cold 6M HCl. After removal of the clear solution, the residues were dried and re-weighed to determine weight loss during acid leaching. The residues were dissolved at low pressure using HF/HNO3 and HCl. Following preliminary semi-quantitative trace element analysis, all fractions were spiked with 85Rb–84Sr and 149Sm–150Nd tracers, followed by extraction of Rb, Sr and LREE using conventional cation exchange and EICHROM Sr and LN resins25. Total analytical blanks (<0.1 ng) were negligible. Isotopic analyses were carried out on a NU Plasma multi-collector ICP-MS coupled to a CETAC Aridus desolvator. As part of an online iterative spike removal/mass bias correction procedure, instrumental mass bias was corrected by internal normalization to 88Sr/86Sr=8.37521 and 146Nd/145Nd=2.0719425 (equivalent to 146Nd/144Nd=0.7219 (ref. 26)); data are reported relative to SRM987=0.710230 and La Jolla Nd=0.511860. Typical in-run precisions (two standard errors) are ±0.000020 (Sr) and ≤±0.000010 (Nd), whereas external (2σ) precisions – based on rock standards – are ±0.000020 (Nd) and ±0.000040 (Sr). External precision (2σ) for 87Rb/86Sr and 147Sm/144Nd is ±0.5% and ±0.2%, respectively. 147Sm/144Nd and 143Nd/144Nd in modern CHUR is 0.1967 and 0.512638. Initial 87Sr/86Sr(t) and εNd(t) were calculated for t=120 Ma. Results for standards (±2 s.d.) are as follows: BCR-2 (n=2); Rb 46.8 ppm, Sr 339 ppm, 87Rb/86Sr 0.400, 87Sr/86Sr 0.70502, Sm 6.48 ppm, Nd 28.32 ppm, 147Sm/144Nd 0.1382, 143Nd/144Nd 0.512629; 0.512640±17 (mean of 21 runs of BCR-2 in 2010), 0.705015±34 (mean of 8 runs of BCR-2 in 2010–2011: JNd-1; 0.512114±23 (mean of 9 runs in 2010); BHVO-2 0.512992±17 (mean of 6 runs in 2010). Results are consistent with Thermal Ionisation Mass Spectrometry (TIMS) reference values. Uncertainties in initial ratios are: 87Sr/86Sr ±0.00010; εNd ±0.5 units. The decay constants are: 87Rb 1.42 10−11/yr, 147Sm 6.54 10−12/yr.

Rb–Sr dating of megacrystic phlogopite from sample 77063 was done on euhedral (1–3 mm) mineral flakes. Two handpicked fractions (2–4 mg) were cleaned in 0.1M HNO3, spiked with 87Rb–84Sr tracer and dissolved on a hotplate. Sr was extracted and purified using two passes over a small (0.1 ml) column of EICHROM Sr-resin (50–100 μm). Rb was extracted using cation resin chromatography (4 ml of AG50-X8, 200–400 mesh). Sr isotope data were measured as described above, whereas Rb isotope dilution analyses were done using the Zr-doping method28. Rb–Sr mica ages were derived by combining each phlogopite analysis with the Rb–Sr data for 77063L and R; calculations were done in ISOPLOT29. External precision (2 s.d.) for 87Rb/86Sr is 0.5%, and for 87Sr/86Sr is 0.01%. 87Sr/86Sr is reported relative to SRM987=0.710230. Rb–Sr model ages (±2 s.d.) for glauconite standard GLO-1 (89.3±0.8 Ma, n=16 over 7 years, assumed initial 87Sr/86Sr 0.7074) and SRM607 feldspar (1424±7 Ma, n=11 over 7 years, assumed initial 87Sr/86Sr 0.705) obtained using the same spike and techniques as those used for the phlogopites are consistent with Ar-Ar reference ages. Biotite GA1550 from Mount Dromedary (SE Australia) yields a Rb–Sr isochron age of 98.0±0.3 Ma (n=9, 0.70445±6, MSWD (mean square weighted deviation) 1.6), consistent with Ar–Ar ages of 98.5±0.8 Ma32 and 98.8±0.5 Ma33. Results are given in Table 4.

Semiquantitative trace element data for leachate–residue pairs (see above) indicate that most of the Hf resides in the residue (>90%), whereas Lu favours the leachates, consistent with their mineralogy and Bizimis et al.34. Overall, Lu–Hf budgets are dominated by the residue. Lu–Hf isotope analyses were therefore done on unleached whole rock powders. After dissolution at high pressure, a ~90% split of the solutions was spiked with a 176Lu–180Hf tracer. Lu and Hf were isolated using a single-column technique35 and measured by Multi-Collector-ICP-MS. The smaller split was equilibrated with a 233U–205Pb tracer, followed by extraction of Pb and U on small columns of AG1-X8 (100–200 mesh, HBr-HCl) and EICHROM TRU resin (100–150 μm), respectively. Pb and U isotope ratios were measured by MC-ICP-MS25. Isotope dilution calculations for U–Pb were done with the EarthTime Excel U–Pb data reduction module36. 176Hf/177Hf was normalized to 179Hf/177Hf=0.7325 and reported relative to JMC475=0.282160. Internal precision (2se) for 176Hf/177Hf is ≤±0.000008, external precision ±0.000015 (2 s.d.). External precision for 176Lu/177Hf is ±1%. USGS standards BCR-2 and BHVO-2, analysed together with the kimberlite samples, yielded the following results: BCR-2, 0.50 ppm Lu, 4.94 ppm, 176Lu/177Hf 0.01439, 176Hf/177Hf 0.282868, 0.282875 and 0.282883; BHVO-2, 0.274 ppm Lu, 4.45 ppm Hf, 176Lu/177Hf 0.00877 and 176Hf/177Hf 0.283104. Modern CHUR has 176Lu/177Hf = 0.0332 and 176Hf/177Hf = 0.282772. The decay constant for 176Lu is 1.865 10−11/year. Mass bias during U and Pb runs was corrected using internal normalisation to the natural U ratio and standard bracketing, respectively. External precision for 238U/204Pb is ±1% (2 s.d.). 232Th/204Pb was derived from 238U/204Pb measured by isotope dilution and Th/U from quadrupole ICP-MS trace element data on different splits of the same powders; expected errors ±10%. External precision for Pb isotope data is ≈±0.1−0.2% (2s.d.); data reported are corrected for mass bias and blank (20±10 pg Pb). Uncertainties for calculated initial Pb isotope ratios, obtained by Monte Carlo simulation with the stated analytical uncertainties and an assumed age uncertainty of ±5 Ma: 206Pb/204Pb ±0.02, 207Pb/204Pb ±0.01, 208Pb/204Pb ≤±0.17. The decay constants are: 238U 0.155125 × 10−9/year, 235U 0.98485 × 10−9/year and 232Th 0.049485 × 10−9/year. Lu-Hf and U-Pb isotope results are given in Table 5.

U–Pb LA-ICP-MS dating of perovskite

U–Pb dating work on perovskite was performed during two analytical sessions: the first was done on polished grains in situ in blocks of fresh kimberlite samples 77063, 77081 and 77082; the second analytical session on the sample 77063 was performed on separated perovskite grains mounted in an epoxy block.

The U–Pb analyses were performed at Macquarie University using a NewWave UP-213 laser ablation microprobe attached to an Agilent 7700 ICP-MS. The analytical technique was described in ref. 37. Ablation occurs in He, permitting efficient sample transport, signal stability and reproducibility of U/Pb fractionation. The spot size varied between 30 μm for perovskite from the polished blocks and 40 μm for separated grains. Because of the smaller spot sizes used on the grains from the polished blocks, the analytical uncertainties are much higher for these grains.

Samples were analysed in runs of 16 analyses comprising 12 analyses of unknowns bracketed by two analyses of a standard zircon (GEMOC GJ1, age 609 Ma) at the beginning and end of each run. The ‘unknowns’ include two near-concordant reference zircons, 91500 (ref. 38) and Mud Tank39, which are analysed before the samples and are used as independent control on reproducibility and instrument stability.

The major problem of the U–Pb analysis of perovskite is the presence of high contents of common Pb. Instead of applying a common-Pb correction, we have used a regression technique, treating population of analyses from a single sample as representing mixtures between the common-Pb and radiogenic-Pb components. The intercepts of the regression line through the raw data on an inverse-Concordia (Tera-Wasserburg) plot thus provide both an estimate of the 207Pb/206Pb of the common-Pb component (upper intercept) and the inferred crystallization age (lower intercept).

A total of 40 perovskites from sample 77063 were analysed during two sessions in April and June 2010. After rejection of 12 analyses with the largest analytical errors, the lower intercept of the regression line through the rest of the data (n=28) gave an age of 113±13 Ma, which we consider as the best estimate for the crystallization age of this kimberlite (Supplementary Fig. S1).

Only 12 perovskites were found and analysed from sample 77081. These produce a high MSWD of 2.7 due to a scatter about the regression line. The rejection of four analyses had reduced this scatter (MSWD=0.63), giving the lower intercept age at 125±8 Ma and the best estimate for the crystallization age for this sample (Supplementary Fig. S2).

Sixteen out of 17 analyses done for sample 77082 produced a lower intercept age of 121±13 Ma, interpreted as crystallization age for this sample (Supplementary Fig. S3).

Additional information

How to cite this article: Yaxley, G. M. et al. The discovery of kimberlites in Antarctica extends the vast Gondwanan Cretaceous province. Nat. Commun. 4:2921 doi: 10.1038/ncomms3921 (2013).


  1. Girnis, A. V. & Ryabchikov, I. D. Conditions and mechanisms of generation of kimberlite magmas. Geol. Ore. Deposits 47, 476–487 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gudfinnsson, G. H. & Presnall, D. C. Continuous gradations among primary carbonatitic, kimberlitic, melilititic, basaltic, picritic, and komatiitic melts in equilibrium with garnet lherzolite at 3–8GPa. J. Petrol. 46, 1645–1659 (2005).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Brey, G. P., Bulatov, V. K., Girnis, A. V. & Lahaye, Y. Experimental melting of carbonated peridotite at 6–10 GPa. J. Petrol. 49, 797–821 (2008).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mitchell, R. H. Kimberlites, Orangeites, And Related Rocks Plenum Press: New York, (1995).

  5. Jelsma, H., Barnett, W., Richards, S. & Lister, G. Tectonic setting of kimberlites. Lithos 112, 155–165 (2009).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mitchell, R. H. Kimberlites: Mineralogy, Geochemistry and Petrology Plenum Press: New York, (1986).

  7. Woolley, A. R. et al. Classification of lamprophyres, lamproites, kimberlites, and the kalsilitic, melilitic, and leucitic rocks. Can. Mineral. 34, 175–186 (1996).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Tappe, S., Foley, S. F., Jenner, G. A. & Kjarsgaard, B. A. Integrating ultramafic lamprophyres into the IUGS classification of igneous rocks: rationale and implications. J. Petrol. 46, 1893–1900 (2005).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Andronikov, A. V. & Egorov, L. S. Mesozoic alkaline-ultrabasic magmatism of Jetty Peninsula. Gondwana 8, 547–557 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Andronikov, A. V. & Foley, S. F. Trace element and Nd-Sr isotopic composition of ultramafic lamprophyres from the East Antarctic Beaver Lake area. Chem. Geol. 175, 291–305 (2001).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Andronikov, A. V., Foley, S. F. & Belyatsky, B. V. Sm-Nd and Rb-Sr isotopic systematics of the East Antarctic Manning Massif alkaline trachybasalts and the development of the mantle beneath the Lambert-Amery rift. Mineral. Petrol. 63, 243–261 (1998).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Foley, S. F., Andronikov, A. V. & Melzer, S. Petrology of ultramafic lamprophyres from the Beaver Lake area of Eastern Antarctica and their relation to the breakup of Gondwanaland. Mineral. Petrol. 74, 361–384 (2002).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sun, S.-S. & McDonough, W. F. Magmatism in the Ocean Basins. eds Saunders A. D., Norry M. J. Geol. Soc. Spec. Publ. 42, 313–345 (1989).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Woodhead, J., Hergt, J., Phillips, D. & Paton, C. African kimberlites revisited: in situ Sr-isotope analysis of groundmass perovskite. Lithos 112, 311–317 (2009).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Belyatski, B. V., Anotonov, A. V., Rodionov, N. V., Laiba, A. A. & Sergeev, S. A. Age and composition of carbonatite kimberlite dykes in the Prince Charles Mountains, East Antarctica. 9th International Kimberlite Conference Extended Abstracts 9IKC-A-00272 (Frankfurt (2008).

  16. Egorov, L. S., Yu Mel'nik, A. & Uykhanov, A. V. The first Antarctic occurrence of a dike kimberlite containing syngenetic calcite carbonatite schlieren. Doklady Rossiyskoy Akademii Nauk 328, 230–233 (1993).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Tappe, S. et al. Craton reactivation on the Labrador Sea margins: 40Ar/ 39Ar age and Sr-Nd-Hf-Pb isotope constraints from alkaline and carbonatite intrusives. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 256, 433–454 (2007).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rosenthal, A., Foley, S. F., Pearson, D. G., Nowell, G. M. & Tappe, S. Petrogenesis of strongly alkaline primitive volcanic rocks at the propagating tip of the western branch of the East African Rift. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 284, 236–248 (2009).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Powell, C. M., Roots, S. R. & Veevers, J. J. Pre-breakup continental extension in East Gondwanaland and the early opening of the eastern Indian Ocean. Tectonophys. 155, 261–283 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Phillips, G. & Laeufer, A. L. Brittle deformation relating to the Carboniferous-Cretaceous evolution of the Lambert Graben, East Antarctica: a precursor for Cenozoic relief development in an intraplate and glaciated region. Tectonophys. 471, 216–224 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Boger, S. D. & Wilson, C. J. L. Brittle faulting in the Prince Charles Mountains, East Antarctica: cretaceous transtensional tectonics related to the break-up of Gondwana. Tectonophys. 367, 173–186 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Harrowfield, M., Holdgate, G. R., Wilson, C. J. L. & McLoughlin, S. Tectonic significance of the Lambert Graben, East Antarctica: reconstructing the Gondwanan rift. Geology 33, 197–200 (2005).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kent, R. Lithospheric uplift in eastern Godwana: evidence for a long-lived mantle plume system? Geology 19, 19–23 (1991).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Norman, M. D., Griffin, W. L., Pearson, N. J., Garcia, M. O. & O'Reilly, S. Y. Quantitative analysis of trace element abundances in glasses and minerals: a comparison of laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry, solution inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry, proton microprobe and electron microprobe data. J. Anal. Atom. Spectrom. 13, 477–482 (1998).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Maas, R., Kamenetsky, M. B., Sobolev, A. V., Kamenetsky, V. S. & Sobolev, N. V. Sr Nd, and Pb isotope evidence for a mantle origin of alkali chlorides and carbonates in the Udachnaya kimberlite, Siberia. Geology 33, 549–552 (2005).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Vance, D. & Thirlwall, M. F. An assessment of mass discrimination in MC-ICPMS using Nd isotopes. Chem. Geol. 185, 227–240 (2002).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kaminsky, F. V. et al. Kimberlitic sources of super-deep diamonds in the Juina area, Mato Grosso State, Brazil. Lithos 114, 16–29 (2010).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Waight, T. E., Baker, J. & Willigers, B. Rb isotope dilution analyses by MC-ICPMS using Zr to correct for mass fractionation: towards improved Rb–Sr geochronology? Chem. Geol. 186, 99–116 (2002).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ludwig, K. R. ISOPLOT/Ex version 3.0: a geochronological toolkit for MS Excel. Berkeley Geochronol. Center Special Publ. 4, 1–70 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kaminsky, F. V., Sablukov, S. M., Sablukova, L. I. & Zakharchenko, O. D. The Fazenda Largo off-craton kimberlites of Piau State, Brazil. J. S. Am. Earth Sci. 28, 288–303 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kent, R. W., Kelley, S. P. & Pringle, M. S. Mineralogy and Ar-40/Ar-39 geochronology of orangeites (Group II kimberlites) from the Damodar Valley, eastern India. Mineral. Mag. 62, 313–323 (1998).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Lehmann, B. et al. Diamondiferous kimberlites in central India synchronous with Deccan flood basalts. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 290, 142–149 (2010).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Read, G. et al. Stratigraphic relations, kimberlite emplacement and lithospheric thermal evolution, Quirico basin, Minas Gerais state, Brazil. Lithos 77, 803–818 (2004).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Bizimis, M., Salters, V. J. M. & Dawson, J. B. The brevity of carbonatite sources in the mantle: evidence from Hf isotopes. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 145, 281–300 (2003).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Münker, C., Weyer, S., Scherer, E. & Mezger, K. Separation of high field strength elements (Nb, Ta, Zr, Hf) and Lu from rock samples for MC-ICPMS measurements. Geochem. Geophys. Geosys. 2, 1065 (2001).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Schmitz, M. D. & Schoene, B. Derivation of isotope ratios, errors, and error correlations for U-Pb geochronology using 205Pb-235U-(233U)-spiked isotope dilution thermal ionization mass spectrometric data. Geochem. Geophys. Geosys. 8, Q8006 (2007).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Batumike, J. M. et al. LAM-ICPMS U-Pb dating of kimberlitic perovskite: Eocene-Oligocene kimberlites from the Kundelungu Plateau, D.R. Congo. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 267, 609–619 (2008).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Wiedenbeck, M. et al. Three natural zircon standards for U–Th–Pb, Lu–Th, trace element and REEanalyses. Geostandards Newsletters 19, 1–23 (1995).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Black, L. P. & Gulson, B. L. The age of the Mud Tank carbonatite, Strangways Range, Northern Territory. J. Aust. Geol. Geophys. 3, 227–232 (1978).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Veevers, J. J., Tewari, R. C. & Mishra, H. K. Aspects of Late Triassic to Early Cretaceous disruption of the Gondwana coal bearing fan of east-central Gondwanaland in Gondwana Nine, Ninth International Gondwana Symposium eds Guha P. K. S., Sengupta S., Ayyasami K., Ghosh R. N. 637–646A.A. Balkema Publishers: Rotterdam, (1996).

  41. Chalapathi Rao, N. V., Lehmann, B., Mainkar, D. & Belyatsky, B. Petrogenesis of the end-Cretaceous diamondiferous Behradih orangeite pipe: implication for mantle plume-lithosphere interaction in the Bastar craton, Central India. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 161, 721–742 (2011).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Tompkins, L. A. & Gonzaga, G. M. Diamonds in Brazil and a proposed model for the origin and distribution of diamonds in the Coromandel region, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Econ. Geol. 84, 591–602 (1989).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Becker, M. & Le Roex, A. P. Geochemistry of South African on- and off-craton, Group I and Group II kimberlites: petrogenesis and source region evolution. J. Petrol. 47, 673–703 (2006).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Gaffney, A. M. et al. Constraints on source-forming processes of West Greenland kimberlites inferred from Hf-Nd isotope systematics. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 71, 2820–2836 (2007).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Harris, M., le Roex, A. & Class, C. Geochemistry of the Uintjiesberg kimberlite, South Africa: petrogenesis of an off-craton, group I, kimberlite. Lithos 74, 149–165 (2004).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Kopylova, M. G. & Hayman, P. Petrology and textural classification of the Jericho kimberlite, northern Slave Province, Nunavut, Canada. Can. J. Earth Sci. 45, 701–723 (2008).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Kostrovitsky, S. I. Isotope-geochemical systematics of kimberlites and related rocks from the Siberian Platform. Russ. Geol. Geophys. 48, 272–290 (2007).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Le Roex, A. P., Bell, D. R. & Davis, P. Petrogenesis of group I kimberlites from Kimberley, South Africa: evidence from bulk-rock geochemistry. J. Petrol. 44, 2261–2286 (2003).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Price, S. E., Russell, J. K. & Kopylova, M. G. Primitive magma from the Jericho Pipe, NWT, Canada: Constraints on primary kimberlite melt chemistry. J. Petrol. 41, 789–808 (2000).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Rao, N. V. C., Gibson, S. A., Pyle, D. M. & Dickin, A. P. Petrogenesis of Proterozoic lamproites and kimberlites from the Cuddapah Basin and Dharwar Craton, southern India. J. Petrol. 45, 907–948 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Nielsen, T. F. D. & Jensen, S. M. The Majuagaa calcite-kimberlite dyke, Maniitsoq, southern West Greenland. Geol. Survey Denmark Greenland Rep. 43, 1–59 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

Download references


G.T.N. thanks R.F. Flint and ANARE expeditioners for assistance during the summers of 1987–88, 1988–89 and 1989–90. C. Lawson and N. Pearson (Macquarie University) provided XRF analyses and electron microprobe time, respectively. We acknowledge funding from the Australian Research Council (V.S.K. and G.M.Y.), the University of Tasmania (V.S.K.) and a Marie Curie International Incoming Fellowship (302637) to A.R. This is contribution 312 from the ARC Centre of Excellence for Core to Crust Fluid Systems ( http://www/ccfs/mq/ and 878 in the GEMOC Key Centre (

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



The manuscript and the ideas therein were mainly developed by G.M.Y., V.S.K., A.R. and G.T.N., with contributions from all other co-authors. G.T.N. collected the samples, performed the EPMA and XRF analyses. M.N. performed the whole rock ICP-MS analyses. R.M. performed the solution mode radiogenic isotope analyses, whereas E.B. contributed the laser-ablation U–Pb perovskite ages and in situ Sr–Nd isotopic measurements for perovskite. V.S.K. performed s.e.m. analysis.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gregory M. Yaxley.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figures S1-S3 (PDF 1618 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yaxley, G., Kamenetsky, V., Nichols, G. et al. The discovery of kimberlites in Antarctica extends the vast Gondwanan Cretaceous province. Nat Commun 4, 2921 (2013).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing