Article | Published:

Engineering particle trajectories in microfluidic flows using particle shape

Nature Communications volume 4, Article number: 2666 (2013) | Download Citation

Abstract

Recent advances in microfluidic technologies have created a demand for techniques to control the motion of flowing microparticles. Here we consider how the shape and geometric confinement of a rigid microparticle can be tailored for ‘self-steering’ under external flow. We find that an asymmetric particle, weakly confined in one direction and strongly confined in another, will align with the flow and focus to the channel centreline. Experimentally and theoretically, we isolate three viscous hydrodynamic mechanisms that contribute to particle dynamics. Through their combined effects, a particle is stably attracted to the channel centreline, effectively behaving as a damped oscillator. We demonstrate the use of self-steering particles for microfluidic device applications, eliminating the need for external forces or sheath flows.

Introduction

In slow viscous flows, suspended particles are coupled by the flow disturbances they create in the surrounding fluid. These hydrodynamic interactions (HIs) can drive spatial organization of a microparticle or system of microparticles in geometric confinement. Specific examples include the cross-stream migration of a single polymer near a wall1, the clustering of red blood cells in a tube2 and the crystallization of rigid spheres with finite inertia in a square channel3,4. Both practical and theoretical considerations motivate interest in hydrodynamic ‘self-steering’ (of a single particle) and self-organization (of multiple interacting particles). In microfluidic devices, control over particle position allows the high throughput performance of operations on individual flowing objects, for example, in on-chip cytometry5 and multiplexed assays with functionalized particles6. Although particles can be directly positioned with external fields or sheath flows6,7, these methods can require cumbersome apparatus or complex channel structure. An elegant alternative is to tailor particle and channel design for self-steering or self-organization. Moreover, if the self-steered position of an object depends on a certain property of the object, a heterogeneous suspension can be separated by that property. For instance, both the stiffness8 and shape9 of blood components are of interest for microfluidic separations. From a theoretical perspective, a unifying framework for non-equilibrium self-organization and self-steering is highly sought after10. Specific mechanisms for cross-streamline migration and focusing in channel flow have been extensively investigated for Brownian11, inertial3,4 and deformable1,2 particles. In these cases, migration arises from the interplay of viscous hydrodynamics near a channel boundary and another physical effect that breaks the reversibility of viscous flow. Conceptually, it seems difficult to reconcile self-organization and self-steering, in which any initial state will evolve towards one of a limited set of dynamical attractors, and reversibility, which requires particle behaviour to make no distinction between two possible directions of time.

Confining boundaries can change the spatial decay and even the tensorial structure of HIs. Interactions take a unique form when the typical particle size is comparable to the height of a confining slit, such that the particles are constrained to ‘quasi-two-dimensional’ (q2D) motion (Fig. 1a). The tightly confined particles experience strong friction from the confining plates, and will therefore lag a pressure-driven external flow. In lagging the flow, the particles create flow disturbances with a characteristic dipolar structure: moving upstream relative to the fluid, particles push fluid away from their upstream edges and draw fluid into their downstream edges. This far-field flow disturbance, the ‘source dipole’, is given by the conservation and transport of fluid mass, and decays as 1/r2 (refs 12, 13). In contrast, the leading order far-field disturbance in bulk (three-dimensional) fluid, the ‘Stokeslet’, is given by the conservation and transport of momentum, and decays as 1/r. The difference between bulk and q2D arises because of the confining plates, which, by exerting friction on the fluid, dissipate momentum and screen its long-range transport, leaving only mass to determine the far-field disturbance.

Figure 1: Model particle geometry and behaviours.
Figure 1

(a) Schematic diagram of the model system. A particle comprising two rigidly connected discs is confined in a thin microchannel and driven by an external flow. (b) Behaviours obtained as particle asymmetry is varied. A symmetric particle oscillates between side walls. When the symmetry is slightly broken, this oscillation is damped and the particle aligns with the flow as it focuses to the centreline. A very asymmetric particle is ‘overdamped’, and rapidly aligns before slowly focusing. The trajectories in b were obtained numerically for the parameters given in the caption of Fig. 5b. The x axes are scaled by a factor of 1/40 to show the full range of particle behaviours.

These unique features of the dipolar flow disturbance allow the realization of ‘flowing crystals’ with novel collective modes14,15,16,17. These are configurations of particles that maintain spatial order as they are advected by an external flow. They are marginally stable: the amplitude of a collective mode neither grows nor decays in time. Consequently, realization of crystals is limited by initial configuration, and they are sensitive to break-up via nonlinear instabilities and channel defects. A natural question is how to introduce an effective attraction to the crystalline states, causing particles to assemble from disorder, and providing a ‘restoring force’ against perturbations. One indication is provided by a recent study which demonstrated stable pairing of droplets via the higher flow disturbance multipoles induced by shape deformation18. This finding suggests a key role for particle shape in achieving self-steering and self-organization.

In this study, we combine theoretical and experimental approaches to investigate how particle shape can be tailored to induce self-steering under flow in q2D microchannels. Our main finding is that a single rigid, asymmetric particle will spontaneously align with the external flow and focus to the channel centreline. This self-steering can be tuned via channel and particle geometry. Moreover, it is time reversible; to our knowledge, all previous instances of hydrodynamic self-steering have been irreversible. Through a simple theoretical model, confirmed by experiments, we demonstrate how assembly arises from the interplay of three viscous effects: rotation and cross-streamline migration, via a particle’s hydrodynamic self-interaction, and rotation via a particle’s interaction with hydrodynamic images. Each effect has an analogue in bulk sedimentation, but not in bulk channel flow. We demonstrate application of these findings in a device setting. Finally, we discuss their implications for the design of self-organizing ‘swarms’ of interacting particles.

Results

Model system and governing parameters

We consider a simple model geometry that captures the generic effects of asymmetry. A particle comprises two discs of radius R1 and R2, with R1R2, which are rigidly connected with distance s between their centres. It is confined in a shallow channel of height H in the z-direction and width W in y. Two lubricating gaps of height h separate each of the discs from the confining walls in z (Fig. 1a). There is a pressure-driven flow in x with a parabolic profile in z and an approximately uniform depth-averaged velocity U0 (Hele-Shaw flow). In the absence of inertia, the governing dimensionless parameters are geometric: , , , and (ref. 19). We define dimensionless time as . The instantaneous particle configuration is defined by the location in y of the midpoint between disc centres, yc ≡ (y1+y2)/2, and angle θ between the external flow and the particle axis, shown in Fig. 1a. Owing to translational symmetry, the position in the flow direction xc ≡ (x1+x2)/2 does not affect particle dynamics.

We describe the theoretical model and the experimental method in detail in the Methods section. In the model, we write a force balance equation for each disc. Each disc experiences drag from the local flow and friction from the confining plates, as detailed analytically in Supplementary Note 1, in addition to a rigid constraint force. The local flow at each disc is determined self-consistently as the external flow plus contributions from the other disc and the discs’ hydrodynamic images. The system of images, previously obtained in Uspal and Doyle20 and presented in Supplementary Note 2, imposes a no mass flux boundary condition on the confining side walls. In the experiments, we use continuous flow lithography (CFL) to fabricate particles with desired shape and initial configuration in situ under q2D channel flow.

Hydrodynamic self-interaction

As the first step in building a complete picture of particle dynamics, we neglect the effect of side walls, isolating a particle’s self-interaction. For an identical pair of discs, the interaction is symmetric: disc 1 pushes on disc 2 just as much as disc 2 pushes on disc 1 (Fig. 2a). The interaction cannot lead to relative motion of the discs, including rotation of the entire particle21. However, when θ≠0° and θ≠90°, it introduces a component to the particle velocity perpendicular to the direction of the external flow20. When 0°<θ<90°, the particle migrates in the direction of decreasing y; when 90°<θ<180°, it migrates with increasing y. This ‘lateral drift’, occurring for both symmetric and asymmetric particles, also occurs for a rod or pair of spheres sedimenting in bulk.

Figure 2: Self-alignment of a particle in unbounded q2D.
Figure 2

(a) Illustration of the self-interaction of a symmetric particle. A disc’s vector shows the component of the flow disturbance from the other disc in , the direction of increasing θ. The vectors are identical: there is no rotation of the particle. (b) When the two discs have different radii, the particle aligns with the flow. (c) Experimental angle vs time for various with , and . We scale the data for each by a fitted , collapsing all data onto a universal curve predicted by theory. (inset) The dependence of the experimental timescales on , along with a theoretical curve for the same parameters (solid) and a theoretical curve with adjusted for best fit (dashed). Each experimental data point is an average of timescales measured for nine individual particles; error bars indicate the standard deviation. (d) Snapshots of a symmetric particle at various times, matched to the times in c. Scale bar, 100 μm. (e) Snapshots for at the same times as in d.

When the discs are dissimilar, the particle aligns itself with the external flow, such that the larger disc is upstream of the smaller disc (Fig. 2b). The principal cause of self-alignment is that one disc is hydrodynamically stronger than the other: in q2D, the magnitude of the dipolar flow disturbance created by a disc scales as the disc area. In Supplementary Note 3, we derive an exact expression for θ as a function of time. Taking t=0 when θ=90°, we obtain , where the timescale depends on particle geometry. Notably, it diverges for . We recover these predictions experimentally. We polymerize particles with various and measure how θ evolves with . We fit a timescale to the data of each . When θ is plotted against , all data collapses onto a universal curve (Fig. 2c). We leave the data for unscaled; for this singular case, the particle maintains its initial angle. The curve asymptotes to θ=0° and θ=180°, and is manifestly time reversible. In the inset of Fig. 2c, we plot the dependence of the experimental timescales on alongside a theoretical curve predicted for the same parameters. The theoretical and experimental timescales have the same order of magnitude and the same trend with . Moreover, by adjusting , we generate a theoretical curve with good fit to the data. The effect of the physics our model neglects is simply to renormalize .

Hydrodynamic self-orientation has not been observed for a rigid particle in bulk channel flow. Bretherton considered bodies with axial and fore-aft symmetry in slow unidirectional shear flows, which include pressure-driven bulk channel flows. He found that nearly all particles tumble in Jeffery orbits with no equilibrium orientation and no cross-streamline migration, except for certain ‘extreme’, high aspect ratio shapes22. To our knowledge, these shapes have not been realized experimentally. Subsequently, flow-driven doublets of unequal spheres, analogous to the dumbbells we consider, were studied by Nir and Acrivos23 and Adler24. These also tumble with no net migration. However, self-alignment has recently been predicted for asymmetric objects in bulk sedimentation, with a dynamical equation similar to ours when the object is initially oriented in a vertical plane25.

Effect of hydrodynamic images

Having isolated a particle’s self-interaction, we consider how it combines with image interactions to produce the behaviours of Fig. 1b. Consider the symmetric particle in Fig. 3. To leading order, the translation in y arises from self-interaction. The chief effect of the images is to rotate the particle. The particle in Fig. 3 begins by migrating towards the lower wall. It is rotated into θ=0°, for which the lateral velocity is zero. This configuration is an extremum of the oscillation. The particle is rotated further and migrates away from the wall. The mirror symmetry of the particle at the extremum ensures that the outgoing trajectory is mirror symmetric with the incoming trajectory. After crossing the centreline, the particle will reflect from the upper wall. Moreover, an oscillation with a θ=90° extremum can be produced with a different initial condition. Again, we can find an analogue in bulk sedimentation; a rod falling between vertical walls will oscillate between them with θ=0° and θ=90° modes of reflection26. Numerically, we construct a phase portrait for a symmetric particle (Fig. 5b), showing trajectories in the space of particle configurations (yc,θ). Owing to the properties of viscous flow, the spatial configuration of a particle completely specifies the state of the system. We find that there are marginally stable fixed points at (yc,θ)=(W/2,0°) and (yc,θ)=(W/2,90°), each of which is associated with a continuous family of periodic orbits.

Figure 3: Oscillation of a symmetric particle.
Figure 3

A symmetric particle oscillates via the combined effects of HI with itself and with its own images. Self-interaction leads to cross-streamline migration (‘lateral drift’) when the particle angle θ≠0° and θ≠90°. The images rotate the particle.

Figure 4: Linearized model of an asymmetric particle.
Figure 4

Rotation by the images is opposed by self-alignment. The particle drifts in the y direction when θ is displaced from the equilibrium value θ=0°. The lateral displacement Δ is defined as Δ≡ycW/2.

Figure 5: Phase diagram and portraits.
Figure 5

(a) Phase diagram showing the critical boundary that separates the underdamped and overdamped regimes. The symbols are points on the boundary obtained numerically for various parameters. The solid lines, matched by colour to the symbols, are theoretical curves for the same parameters. The numerical data and theoretical curves collapse onto one universal boundary. (b) Portraits showing particle trajectories in the phase space (yc,θ). Portraits were obtained numerically for , , and . Arrows give direction of motion in phase space. Dots identify the trajectories shown in Fig. 1b.

For an asymmetric particle, self-alignment changes the fixed point (yc,θ)=(W/2,0°) into an attractor, as we demonstrate with a linearized model (Fig. 4). We define Δ ≡ ycW/2, and model lateral drift as , where a>0 depends on the dimensionless parameters. We model the rotational dynamics by , with coefficients b>0 and c ≥ 0 that, respectively, capture the strength of the images and self-alignment. When the particle is displaced from the centreline (Δ≠0), the effect of the images is to rotate the particle away from θ=0°, which is opposed by self-alignment. These equations can be combined into . Without self-alignment (c=0), the particle oscillates around the fixed point. When c≠0, the particle is attracted to the fixed point via either a decaying oscillation or an ‘overdamped’ approach. These regimes are separated by a critical boundary in parameter space . Numerically, we construct a boundary by finding the critical as a function of for various sets of the parameters , and , as described in Supplementary Note 4. We also obtain expressions for a, b and c via heuristic arguments, yielding a function that fits the numerical data for each individual parameter set (Supplementary Fig. S1). We collapse the numerical data and theoretical curves with the empirically fitted scaling in Fig. 5a, exposing the universal shape of the curve.

This phase diagram can guide the design and optimization of self-steering particles. For a given set of parameters , and , focusing occurs over the shortest streamwise travel distance at , as the analogy with a ‘critically damped’ oscillator suggests (Supplementary Note 5 and Supplementary Fig. S2). The critical boundary occurs when the timescale for self-alignment is comparable to the timescale for a particle to migrate across the channel width. Along the boundary, decreasing while increasing or decreasing is an effective design strategy to reduce streamwise travel distance by decreasing lateral migration distance and enhancing self-alignment. Strikingly, the diagram does not depend on , the dimensionless lubricating gap thickness, which can be independently tuned. Decreasing slows down the particles, strengthening HIs and reducing the travel distance for focusing.

Having considered small displacements from (yc,θ)=(W/2,0°), we construct phase portraits for and (Fig. 5b). The slightly asymmetric particle approaches (yc,θ)=(W/2,0°) via a decaying oscillation, but there are marginally stable fixed points with θ=±90°. These ‘bouncing states’ are due to the interaction of a particle with a nearby image (Supplementary Note 6 and Supplementary Fig. S3). For , any point in the phase space is along a trajectory connecting the unstable fixed point (yc,θ)=(W/2,180°) with the stable fixed point. For a highly asymmetric particle, there is a separation of timescales between rapid self-alignment and slow lateral focusing. This separation can be seen in the convergence of all trajectories to a slow manifold, outlined in red. As the attractor is asymptotic and accompanied by a repeller, it is compatible with reversibility: if the flow is reversed, the fixed points exchange stability, and a particle retraces its trajectory in phase space, attracted to the other fixed point. We explicitly demonstrate reversibility in Supplementary Fig. S4 and Supplementary Note 7.

Our complete theoretical picture predicts a wide range of experimental observations involving both the channel side walls and particle self-interaction. We first consider three particle trajectories in individual detail. Figure 6a and Supplementary Movie 1 show an experimental montage in which a symmetric particle is reflected from a side wall. We obtain qualitative agreement with the theoretical trajectory generated for the same parameters and initial conditions as the experiment, shown in the inset. The trajectory is shown quantitatively in Fig. 6d. The theoretical prediction can be fitted to the experimental data if it is rescaled in x. If we relax the assumption of perfect symmetry and take , the resulting theoretical curve better captures the curvature of the data. This asymmetry corresponds to a difference in radii of ~0.2 μm, within the uncertainty of CFL (Supplementary Methods and Supplementary Fig. S5). In Fig. 6b and Supplementary Movie 2, an asymmetric particle with polymerized with θ=−10° focuses to the channel centreline. Good agreement between theory and experiment is obtained upon rescaling. This initial condition is near the slow manifold for overdamped dynamics. For a particle with θ=135°, we obtain the predicted two timescale process of initial reorientation followed by slow focusing (Fig. 6c). This difference in timescales is manifested in different rescalings needed to fit theory to data for the initial dynamics, dominated by self-interaction and for focusing, in which the images are important.

Figure 6: Individual particle trajectories. Scale bars, 100 μm.
Figure 6

(a) Experimental montage showing reflection of a symmetric particle. The corresponding theoretical trajectory is shown in the inset. (b) A strongly asymmetric particle with θ=−10° focuses to the centreline. (c) A strongly asymmetric particle with a large initial angle aligns and then focuses to the centreline. (d) Position data for the trajectory in a. The theoretical trajectory for was scaled in x by a factor of 0.475. A theoretical curve with , for which the rescaling is 0.4, better captures the curvature of the data. (e) For the particle in b, the rescaling is 0.15. (f) For the two timescale process of c, different rescalings of 3 and 0.1 are required to capture the initial and steady dynamics. For all trajectories, , and .

Finally, we apply the insights developed in this manuscript to engineer a practical microfluidic system with self-focusing particles. We can thereby build a statistical picture of particle dynamics from hundreds of trajectories. We fabricate asymmetric and symmetric fluorescent particles in a synthesis channel and collect them from the channel outlet in an Eppendorf tube containing a common buffer. After rigorously washing the particles by successive steps of gentle centrifugation and decanting, we resuspend the particles in approximately density matched solvent at the desired concentration and flow the suspension through a detection channel. In the detection channel, we measure the transverse position yc of each flowing particle near the inlet and the outlet with fluorescence microscopy. The results are shown in Fig. 7 and Supplementary Movies 3 and 4. Starting from a broad and essentially random distribution of transverse positions, most asymmetric particles focus to the centreline. The finite width of the central peak is due to the finite length of the channel; with a longer channel, it would be narrower. The two side peaks are possibly due to the high shear rate in the boundary layer near the walls. In contrast, the symmetric particles remain unfocused. These results demonstrate both ‘self-steering’ for particle-based assays, as the asymmetric particles are focused and aligned for interrogation, and simple shape-based separation, as the centreline is enriched with asymmetric particles at the outlet. We also observe that a small fraction of both the symmetric and asymmetric particles (<12%) remain close to the walls at all times.

Figure 7: Statistics of particles in a flow-through device.
Figure 7

(a) Fluorescence microscopy image of symmetric and asymmetric particles flowing in a channel. The asymmetric particles focus to the centreline (red). The white lines indicate the channel side walls. Scale bar, 100 μm. (b) Distributions of transverse positions for symmetric particles () measured near the inlet (blue, left hatching) and outlet (red, right hatching). Both distributions are nearly uniform across the channel width. (c) Distributions of transverse positions for the asymmetric particles (). The particles begin nearly uniformly distributed at the inlet. Most focus to the centreline near the outlet. Statistics are gathered from over 300 symmetric and 300 asymmetric particle trajectories.

Discussion

Experimentally and theoretically, we have shown that asymmetric particles flowing in a q2D channel self-steer − align with the flow and focus to the centreline − while symmetric particles oscillate between side walls. Via an analogy to a damped oscillator, we isolated three contributing hydrodynamic mechanisms and exhaustively revealed the dependence of the dynamics on the governing parameters, recovering the critical boundary between underdamped and overdamped regimes. Experiments and theory agree qualitatively and semiquantitatively.

Uniquely, focusing in q2D channel flow requires no physics beyond viscous hydrodynamics. In contrast, an axisymmetric rigid particle in bulk channel flow tumbles in a modified Jeffery orbit with no net migration22,23,24,27. Chiral particles migrate across streamlines, but do not focus28, possibly because they have no equilibrium orientation. For the same reason, we suspect that curved fibres, recently predicted to migrate29, will not focus either. On the other hand, we found intriguing connections between q2D channel flow and bulk sedimentation, which may be due to a common feature: to leading order, the singularities that couple particles maintain fixed orientation. In sedimentation, gravity introduces point forces oriented in the vertical direction; in q2D channel flow, dipoles are approximately oriented upstream. In contrast, consider an axisymmetric rigid particle in bulk and driven by flow. Owing to the inextensibility of the particle, it creates a force dipole (pair of Stokeslets) that disturbs the flow if the particle is subject to a straining field, such as Poiseuille flow. The orientation and sign of this dipole depends on the particle orientation. Consequently, the periodicity of a Jeffery orbit entails that the force dipole averages out, as the particle equally samples the axes of extension and compression. With zero net force dipole, no net lift is produced by images introduced by confining boundaries. We have also shown that self-steering does not require irreversible physics, contrary to common intuition. Reversibility is not violated if an asymptotic attractor in phase space is accompanied by an asymptotic repeller.

Our findings open a new direction for passive manipulation of particles flowing in microdevices: trajectories can be engineered via particle shape and confinement. We demonstrated that dilute suspensions of asymmetric particles entering a q2D channel in a random spatial distribution will exit in an aligned and focused stream if the channel is sufficiently long. Symmetric particles, on the other hand, show no focusing effect. A lab-on-a-chip system that applies these findings will not require external forces or sheath flows to position particles, simplifying device design, manufacture and use. In the same demonstration, we also performed a shape-based separation, enriching the centreline with asymmetric particles. Insights gained from this demonstration suggest future applications. We may be able to polymerize bifunctional particles containing a fluorescent code on the downstream edge of the particle and containing biomolecular capture probes such as DNA or antibodies in the upstream edge of the particle. These can be used for bioassays, harnessing previously shown advantages of using hydrogel particles for biosensing30. It is important to note that the particles considered here always align in the same direction, in contrast with particles aligned with sheath flows, such as in flow cytometry.

Our results also provide the foundation for study of q2D systems in which particle–particle interactions are important, including multiparticle clusters and concentrated suspensions. In such systems, the flowing crystalline states discussed in the introduction are possible. In preliminary numerical work, clusters assemble into the one-dimensional crystalline states described in Uspal and Doyle15, in which particles are ordered in the lateral direction, and suspensions self-organize into two-dimensional crystals. We anticipate that our mechanistic insights into single particle dynamics will generalize to these ‘swarms’.

Methods

Numerical model

We assume the creeping flow or zero Reynolds number limit. The velocity of disc i, , is given by a force balance:

where U(ri) is the depth-averaged velocity at the disc position ri=(xi, yi), γc ≡ 12μ/H, μ is the fluid viscosity, which ultimately drops out of the equations, and Fi is a force of rigid constraint if disc i is connected to another disc. ζi is a drag coefficient, derived in Supplementary Note 1. We assume simple shear in the lubricating gaps, so that the disc friction coefficient γp=2μ/h. Significantly, γp>γc, so that a disc will lag its local flow field, creating a dipolar disturbance. For a free (non-connected) disc, this lag has a simple expression: as Fi=0, equation (1) can be rearranged as . αi characterizes the mobility of disc i, with 0<αi<1. In Supplementary Fig. S6, we demonstrate good agreement of this simple model with the more detailed analysis of Halpern and Secomb19. The only free parameters are , , , and , defined above.

A rigid constraint k between discs i and j is associated with a constraint equation and a force F(k), where rijrirj. In our disc-rod model of a dumbbell particle, the rigid constraint and the four disc force balance equations realize one torque balance and two force balance conditions. To simplify the analysis, we neglect the effects of lubrication forces and the rotation of individual discs. In Supplementary Note 8 and Supplementary Figs S7 and S8, we show that including disc rotations would improve the quantitative accuracy of our model, but not change our qualitative findings.

The local flow field at disc i is determined through an implicit equation

where G(ij)(rij,rj) is a tensor containing the leading order, far-field contribution of disc j to the local field at i. This tensor, given in Supplementary Note 2, includes the effect of the hydrodynamic images needed to impose boundary conditions at the side walls. The hydrodynamic strength of disc j is characterized by a quantity that scales G(ij). The constraint equations and equations (1) and (2) can be arranged into matrix form AUp=B, where Up is a vector containing all 2N disc velocities, 2N local fields and n constraint forces. We consider a single particle, so that N=2 and n=1. A is a matrix constructed from disc interactions, and B collects terms involving U0. This system can be solved and integrated numerically.

Continuous flow lithography

The complete experimental setup is depicted in Supplementary Fig. S9. Particles with predefined geometries are synthesized in situ at the desired initial position and orientation using CFL, described in detail in Dendukuri et al.31 In brief, an acrylate oligomer (poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate) mixed with a photoinitiator is pumped through the poly(dimethylsiloxane) channel depicted in Fig. 1a using external pressure. The channel is mounted on an inverted microscope. Particles are polymerized with short pulses of ultraviolet light (50 ms for Fig. 2 and 100 ms for Fig. 6.) The geometry of the particle in the xy plane is imposed by a lithographic mask placed between the microscope objective and the ultraviolet source. The height of the particle inside the channel is dictated by the ultraviolet exposure time32. Importantly, the well-known oxygen inhibition effect in the CFL method31,32 provides uniformly thin, unpolymerized, lubricating layers between the microparticle and the top and bottom poly(dimethylsiloxane) walls. Particle height can be measured in the channel outlet, where some flip to their sides, as shown in Supplementary Fig. S10. A complete list of synthesized particle geometries is provided in Supplementary Table S1. Channels are 30 μm in depth, 500 μm in width and 2.4 cm in length. Using the hydraulic diameter 2HW/(H+W) as a length scale, 55 cp as the prepolymer viscosity, 50 μm s−1as a typical flow speed and 1.12 × 103 kg m−3 as the prepolymer density, a typical Reynolds number is Re=6 × 10−5. Inertial effects are therefore negligible.

As the particles move along the channel, the microscope stage is translated by a homemade linear motor, ensuring that the particles remain in the field of view. Movies of particle trajectories are recorded using a CCD camera and analysed offline to determine particle position and angle. We confirm that the applied pressure and the flow speed remain constant throughout the course of an experiment by synthesizing a disc and tracking its motion along the channel. The flow speed is determined by tracking 1.6 μm fluorescent tracer beads mixed with the flowing solution33, illustrated in Supplementary Fig. S11.

For experiments presented in Fig. 7, we synthesize fluorescent particles using CFL. To covalently bind fluorescent dye to the synthesized particles, we add acrylate-modified rhodamine to acrylate oligomer and photoinitiator solution. The synthesized particles are collected in a Tris-EDTA buffer containing 0.1 vol/vol surfactant Tween-20 in an 1.7 ml Eppendorf tube. The collected particles are resuspended in an approximately density matched solution containing 25% vol/vol poly(ethylene glycol) (molecular weight 400 g mol−1) in Tris-EDTA buffer. Fluorescent particles are pumped through the detection channel. Particles are imaged with an appropriate ultraviolet light source and filter set for Rhodamine. The synthesis and detection channels are 30 μm in depth, 300 μm in width and 2.4 cm in length. We have analysed over 300 symmetric and asymmetric particles. Further details regarding the experimental set-up and procedures are described in Supplementary Methods.

Additional information

How to cite this article: Uspal, W. E. et al. Engineering particle trajectories in microfluidic flows using particle shape. Nat. Commun. 4:2666 doi: 10.1038/ncomms3666 (2013).

References

  1. 1.

    Fluid dynamics of dissolved polymer molecules in confined geometries. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 43, 273–298 (2011).

  2. 2.

    , & Flow-induced clustering and alignment of vesicles and red blood cells in microcapillaries. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 6039–6043 (2009).

  3. 3.

    , , & Dynamic self-assembly and control of microfluidic particle crystals. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 22413–22418 (2010).

  4. 4.

    , , & Continuous inertial focusing, ordering, and separation of particles in microchannels. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 18892–18897 (2007).

  5. 5.

    , , & Single-layer planar on-chip flow cytometer using microfluidic drifting based three-dimensional (3D) hydrodynamic focusing. Lab Chip 8, 1583–1589 (2009).

  6. 6.

    , & High-throughput flow alignment of barcoded hydrogel microparticles. Lab Chip 9, 3100–3109 (2010).

  7. 7.

    , , , & Dielectrophoresis switching with vertical sidewall electrodes for microfluidic flow cytometry. Lab Chip 7, 1114–1120 (2007).

  8. 8.

    et al. Deformability based cell margination – a simple microfluidic design for malaria-infected erythrocyte separation. Lab Chip 10, 2605–2613 (2010).

  9. 9.

    , & Rotational separation of non-spherical bioparticles using I-shaped pillar arrays in a microfluidic device. Nat. Commun. 4, 1625 (2012).

  10. 10.

    & Self-assembly at all scales. Science 295, 2418–2421 (2002).

  11. 11.

    & Inhomogeneous distribution of a rigid fibre undergoing rectilinear flow between parallel walls at high Peclet numbers. J. Fluid Mech. 630, 267–298 (2009).

  12. 12.

    & Stokes flow for a stokeslet between two parallel flat plates. J. Eng. Math. 10, 287–303 (1976).

  13. 13.

    Hydrodynamic interaction in confined geometries. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn 78, 041002 (2009).

  14. 14.

    , & Phonons in a one-dimensional microfluidic crystal. Nat. Phys. 2, 743–748 (2006).

  15. 15.

    & Collective dynamics of small clusters of particles flowing in a quasi-two-dimensional microchannel. Soft Matter. 8, 10676–10686 (2012).

  16. 16.

    , & The physics of 2D microfluidic droplet ensembles. Phys. Rep. 516, 103–145 (2012).

  17. 17.

    , , & Active and driven hydrodynamic crystals. Eur. Phys. J. E 35, 68 (2012).

  18. 18.

    et al. Collective dynamics of confined rigid spheres and deformable drops. Soft Matter. 8, 7495–7506 (2012).

  19. 19.

    & Viscous motion of disk-shaped particles through parallel-sided channels with near-minimal widths. J. Fluid Mech. 231, 545–560 (1991).

  20. 20.

    & Scattering and nonlinear bound states of hydrodynamically coupled particles in a narrow channel. Phys. Rev. E 85, 016325 (2012).

  21. 21.

    , , , & Hydrodynamic pair attractions between driven colloidal particles. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 158302 (2011).

  22. 22.

    The motion of rigid particles in a shear flow at low Reynolds number. J. Fluid Mech. 14, 284–304 (1962).

  23. 23.

    & On the creeping motion of two arbitrary-sized touching spheres in a linear shear field. J. Fluid Mech. 59, 209–223 (1973).

  24. 24.

    Interaction of unequal spheres: I. Hydrodynamic interaction: colloidal forces. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 84, 461–474 (1981).

  25. 25.

    & Hydrodynamic orienting of asymmetric microobjects under gravity. J. Phys. Condens. Matter. 21, 204102 (2009).

  26. 26.

    , , & Rods falling near a vertical wall. J. Fluid Mech. 83, 273–287 (1977).

  27. 27.

    & Characterization of hydrodynamic surface interactions of Escherichia coli cell bodies in shear flow. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 138103 (2009).

  28. 28.

    , , & Separation of microscale chiral objects by shear flow. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 158103 (2009).

  29. 29.

    , , & Flipping, scooping, and spinning: drift of rigid curved nonchiral fibers in simple shear. Phys. Fluids 24, 123394 (2012).

  30. 30.

    , , & Bar-coded hydrogel microparticles for protein detection: synthesis, assay and scanning. Nat. Protoc. 6, 1761–1774 (2011).

  31. 31.

    , , , & Continuous flow lithography for high-throughput microparticle synthesis. Nat. Mater. 5, 365–369 (2006).

  32. 32.

    et al. Modeling of oxygen-inhibited free radical photopolymerization in a PDMS microfluidic device. Macromolecules 41, 8547–8556 (2008).

  33. 33.

    & Methods of digital video microscopy for colloidal studies. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 179, 298–310 (1996).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by National Science Foundation grant CMMI-1120724, Novartis, and the Institute for Collaborative Biotechnologies through contract no. W911NF-09-D-0001 from the U.S. Army Research Office. The content of the information does not necessarily reflect the position or the policy of the Government, and no official endorsement should be inferred. The authors thank R. Srinivas and M. Helgeson for assistance in experiments.

Author information

Author notes

    • William E. Uspal
    •  & H Burak Eral

    These authors contributed equally to this work

Affiliations

  1. Department of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Room 4-304, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA

    • William E. Uspal
  2. Department of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Building 66, 25 Ames Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA

    • H Burak Eral
    •  & Patrick S. Doyle

Authors

  1. Search for William E. Uspal in:

  2. Search for H Burak Eral in:

  3. Search for Patrick S. Doyle in:

Contributions

W.E.U., H.B.E. and P.S.D. designed the research project. W.E.U. carried out the theoretical analysis and simulations. H.B.E. performed the experiments. W.E.U. and H.B.E. wrote the manuscript. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript. W.E.U. and H.B.E. contributed equally to this work.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrick S. Doyle.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Figures, Table, Notes, Methods and References.

    Supplementary Figures S1-S11, Supplementary Table S1, Supplementary Notes 1-8, Supplementary Methods and Supplementary References

Videos

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Movie 1

    Oscillation of a very slightly asymmetric particle. A particle oscillates between channel side walls. The detailed trajectory and comparison with theory is given in Figure 6a and in Supplementary Figure S5. Comparison with theory suggests that the particle is slightly asymmetric, with R≈ 1.01, and that the particle is in a basin of marginal stability. The channel width is 500 μm and the distance between two marks on the channel wall is 100 μm. The microscope stage is moving at a comparable speed to the particle speed with respect to lab frame to keep the particle in field of view.

  2. 2.

    Supplementary Movie 2

    Alignment and cross-streamline migration. An asymmetric (R≈1.3) particle with θ = -10° focuses to the centerline. The detailed trajectory and comparison with theory is given in Figure 6b. The particle first aligns with the flow then migrates to the centerline, illustrating the "very asymmetric" behaviour introduced in Figure 1b. The channel width is 500 μm and the distance between two marks on the channel wall is 100 μm. The microscope stage is moving at a comparable speed to the particle speed with respect to the lab frame to keep the particle in field of view.

  3. 3.

    Supplementary Movie 3

    Particles are randomly distributed across the channel width at the inlet. Mixture of fluorescent asymmetric (R≈1.3) and symmetric particles (R≈1) injected through a microchannel imaged at the start of channel (xc/W=0). Both symmetric and asymmetric particles are randomly distributed along channel width, and show no preference to enter the channel at a particular transverse position. Figure 7b provides a statistical picture supporting the visual observation. The width of channel is 300 μm.

  4. 4.

    Supplementary Movie 4

    Only asymmetric particles are focused to the centerline at the outlet. Mixture of asymmetric (R≈1.3) and symmetric particles (R≈1) injected through a microchannel imaged at the end of same channel as movie 3 (xc/W =40). The symmetric particles are randomly distributed along channel width, whereas the asymmetric particles focus along the centerline. Figure 7c provides a statistical picture. The width of channel is 300 μm.

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms3666

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.