Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Brillouin cavity optomechanics with microfluidic devices

Abstract

Cavity optomechanics allows the parametric coupling of phonon- and photon-modes in microresonators and is presently investigated in a broad variety of solid-state systems. Optomechanics with superfluids has been proposed as a path towards ultra-low optical- and mechanical-dissipation. However, there have been no optomechanics experiments reported with non-solid phases of matter. Direct liquid immersion of optomechanics experiments is challenging, as the acoustic energy simply leaks out to the higher-impedance liquid surrounding the device. Here we confine liquids within hollow resonators to circumvent this issue and to enable optical excitation of mechanical whispering-gallery modes at frequencies ranging from 2 to 11,000 MHz. Our device enables optomechanical investigation with liquids, while light is conventionally coupled from the outer dry side of the capillary, and liquids are provided by means of a standard microfluidic inlet.

Introduction

Stimulated Brillouin scattering (SBS)1,2 was considered for many years as an optical gain mechanism for lasers3 and for nonlinear optics including phase conjugation4 and slow light5. Subsequently, the platforms for Brillouin scattering were extended from bulk materials and fibres, to droplets6, nano-spheres7, photonic-crystal fibres8 and crystalline resonators9,10. The recent demonstration of Brillouin scattering in microspheres11 was followed by the Brillouin cooling12 and excitation10,13 of their vibrational modes as well; which indicates that Brillouin effects can serve as a general mechanism for actuating (and interrogating) vibration in various types of micro-mechanical resonators. In separate research on optofluidic devices14,15, the motion of liquids has been used to control light, but light has rarely been used to actuate a fluid16.

In this study, we use the Brillouin scattering of light from sound to excite and measure vibration in a microfluidic optomechanical (μFOM) resonator. We design, fabricate and actuate μFOM resonators that exhibit mechanical deformation at their solid–fluid interface. Here confinement of the test fluid inside the device mitigates acoustic loss. Conversely, if an optomechanical resonator will just naively be submerged in a liquid, acoustic radiative losses will increase on account of the acoustic impedance of liquids being much larger than that of air.

Results

Experimental device and excitation mechanisms

Our μFOM device (Fig. 1a) is fabricated from a lengthwise-drawn fused-silica capillary17 with its radius modulated as a function of length (see Methods). At its widest point, this glass device forms a whispering-gallery mode (WGM) microresonator18 that resonantly enhances both light and sound (Fig. 1d) while supporting a considerable overlap between the optical and mechanical modes. The acoustic modes are optically excited by means of forward10,12,13 and backward9,11 SBS, that is, F-SBS and B-SBS, respectively.

Figure 1: Overview of the experiment.
figure 1

(a) Colourized scanning electron micrograph of a fused-silica μFOM device, showing the modulation of the radius as a function of position. Scale bar, 200 μm. (b) Dimensions of the device used to obtain mechanical WGM in Fig. 3b–f. Not drawn to scale. (c) A tapered optical fibre is used to couple light in and out of the whispering-gallery optical modes of the μFOM resonator (without contact). We employ a telecom wavelength 1.5 μm pump laser without any modulation. A high-speed photodetector measures the mechanical vibration by means of its optical signature, that is, the beat note between the optical pump and the Stokes-scattered light. The experimental configuration for forward scattering is illustrated here. (d) Illustration of the mechanical WGMs on the μFOM resonator, showing that mechanical displacement is concentrated at the equator. The mode circulates at the velocity of sound, vs (e) Illustration of the optical WGMs of the μFOM resonator that travel at the speed of light, c.

In the case of B-SBS19, the incoming pump light (frequency ωp) photoelastically back-scatters from a high-frequency acoustic wave (frequency Ω) in the material to generate a lower frequency Stokes optical signal (frequency ωsp−Ω) as shown in Fig. 2. Simultaneously, electrostrictive pressure is generated by the two optical signals, which amplifies the acoustic wave. Optical spectrum analysis reveals the optical pump and Stokes signals, as shown previously in Tomes and Carmon11. The resulting beat note between pump and Stokes signals measured on an electrical spectrum analyser is representative of the high-frequency acoustic wave. This B-SBS-positive feedback process occurs near Ω=11 GHz mechanical frequency in silica when 1.5 μm pump light is used19. An experimental example of such a mode in this study is shown in Fig. 3f.

Figure 2: Acoustic WGM frequencies are determined by momentum conservation.
figure 2

Conservation of momentum between photons and phonons dictates the acoustic WGM frequencies that are generated through SBS. Light travelling in the tapered waveguide evanescently couples to optical WGMs of the resonator, and is scattered to Stokes frequencies in either the forward or backward direction. In the case of back-scattering (B-SBS) momentum conservation enforces long acoustic k-vectors such that the acoustic modes are at high frequencies (that is, 10 GHz regime). Stokes light is received from the same tapered coupler in the backward direction. In forward scattering (F-SBS) momentum, conservation enforces that the acoustic modes are at much lower frequencies (that is, <1 GHz regime). Stokes light is received in the forward direction as illustrated in Fig. 1c.

Figure 3: Experimental observation of mechanical oscillations in water-filled devices.
figure 3

(a) Wineglass mechanical mode oscillation at 7.4 MHz. H1 and H2 are the first and second harmonics, respectively. Peaks at 10.81 and 18.27 MHz are caused by other mechanical modes of vibration being actuated. (be) Acoustic WGM oscillations of various azimuthal mode orders identified with the number M. These modes are excited by forward SBS. (f) Extremely high-order acoustic WGM oscillations near 11 GHz are excited by backward SBS. a.u., arbitrary unit.

The case for forward scattering, that is, F-SBS, is identical to what is described above, except that the pump light photoelastically scatters in the forward direction such that the Stokes signal copropagates with the pump. This reversal of the scattering direction (to forwards) suggests that much smaller phonon momentum is required to bridge between the pump and Stokes momentum gap (Fig. 2). As a result, lower acoustic frequencies (sub-GHz) are more likely for the F-SBS process. Additional details on the energy and momentum conservation requirements20 for F-SBS and B-SBS in a circular resonator are discussed in9,10,11,12,13,21,22,23. Specifically for the capillary geometry that we use here, it is indicated24 that a wide variety of acoustic WGMs exist in the shell-type geometry.

Excitation of acoustic WGMs

We experimentally excite acoustic WGM oscillations in a water-filled μFOM resonator, ranging in frequency from 99 to 11,000 MHz (Fig. 3b–f). As described in Fig. 2, the ‘Brillouin’ optomechanical process13 allows for excitation and measurement of these acoustic WGM oscillations by coupling continuous-in-time light at an optical resonance, while interrogating the optomechanical oscillation at the fibre output of the system (see Methods). No modulation of the pump laser is needed. We introduce and extract light from the optical WGMs by means of evanescent coupling with a tapered optical fibre25,26 (as shown in Fig. 1c). Optical ring-down measurements27 indicate optical quality factors in excess of Qo=108 (highest measured Qo=1.6 × 108). No contact between the fibre and the μFOM resonator is required for mechanical transduction, so the acoustic quality factors are not degraded. The same optical fibre taper is used to extract the Stokes scattered light from the device, which is then used as a measure of the mechanical vibration within the structure12. All of our experiments are performed at room temperature and atmospheric pressure, and various solutions are introduced into the device by means of a syringe pump.

We calculate the mechanical modes of the μFOM resonator using three-dimentional finite element modelling using Comsol Multiphysics (http://www.comsol.com/) as described previously in Zehnpfennig et al.22 and Bahl et al.24 Only the glass capillary is modelled, without a liquid, to extract the mechanical modes of the device that correspond to the observed oscillation. Each of these modes is identified with a M-number which is the azimuthal mode order quantifying the number of acoustic wavelengths around the equatorial circumference of the device. In addition, a M=2 WGM at 7 MHz is observed (Fig. 3a), that is generally referred to as a wineglass mode. The harmonics in this wineglass mode oscillation (H1, H2 in Fig. 3a) are typical for such low frequency modes and result from the fact that this is a standing-wave type vibration excited by centrifugal radiation pressure28,29,30,31, as opposed to the travelling-wave vibrations in Fig. 3b–f.

Quantifying solid–liquid interaction

The penetration of sound to the liquid scales with the ratio between the acoustic wavelength and the thickness of the resonator wall. Therefore, the 7.4 MHz (M=2) mode is calculated to have large penetration into the fluid (Fig. 4a). Finite element calculation shows that the 99 MHz (M=8) mode has a 16% penetration to fluid, defined by the deformation amplitude at the inner fluid interface divided by the maximum deformation (Fig. 4b). An arguably better method of quantifying the efficiency of interaction with the liquid would be to calculate the ratio of energy stored in fluid deformation to the energy stored in the glass deformation. As this requires modelling of the fluid as well, this preferred quantification method is not chosen here. The higher M modes have lower penetration into the liquid. However, as we can fabricate the resonator with walls as thin as 560 nm (ref. 32) we believe that a large acoustic penetration to water will be possible in such thin-wall silica bubble resonators even for the 11 GHz mode (M≈650), which can open a rare hypersonic window for the acoustic analysis of liquids. Reduction in wall thickness may even allow access to an interesting regime where giant-enhanced Brillouin scattering is predicted33.

Figure 4: Calculated equatorial mechanical mode profiles.
figure 4

(a) For the M=2 wineglass mode at 8 MHz (experimentally appears at 7.4 MHz, see Fig. 3a) the displacement ratio of internal and external surfaces is almost 1:1 at the equator. (b) For the experimentally observed M=8 acoustic WGM at 99 MHz (see Fig. 3b), the inner surface experiences 16% displacement relative to the outer surface.

Characterization of mechanical mode

We measure that the minimum power required to excite these oscillations in the water-filled μFOM device is 158 μW (Fig. 5a). We also measured a mechanical quality factor Qm=4,700 for the 99 MHz (M=8) mode in this water-filled device (Fig. 5b), via the sub-threshold oscillation linewidth, which implies Qm × Frequency=4.6 × 1011. This ‘f-Q product’ compares well against the previously measured Qm=12,300 in a solid silica sphere for a 95-MHz mode12.

Figure 5: Characterization of 99 MHz acoustic WGM in a water-filled device.
figure 5

(a) Lowest observed optical threshold power to excite mechanical oscillation is 158 μW. Error bars indicate variance of each averaged measurement. (b) The intrinsic mechanical linewidth (mechanical quality factor) is directly observed at very low input optical power. Error bars indicate local variance of the averaged raw data. (c) A spectrogram of the mechanical oscillation frequency spectrum is obtained with above-threshold input optical power. x axis is mechanical frequency measured through the beat note of the pump and the vibration-scattered Stokes light on a photodetector, y axis is logarithmic mechanical oscillation power, and depth axis is time. In this example, the laser was rapidly scanned back-and-forth through the region of the optical mode that exhibits phase-matching for this mechanical oscillation. (d) Peak frequencies extracted from spectrogram of c show a s.d. of 215 Hz. (e) Allan deviation plot of the frequency data in d provides an estimate of the potential sensor resolution. a.u., arbitrary unit.

This 99 MHz (M=8) mode of vibration can be maintained as long as the CW input laser power is provided. A spectrogram demonstrating this stability (Fig. 5c) is obtained over 140 seconds while periodically scanning through the optical resonance that excites this mechanical mode. While such oscillation data is typically captured with the laser at a fixed frequency, we practically found that scanning our pump laser through the optical resonance is more repeatable. This is because scanning is less affected by unknown drifts. We detect the peak oscillation frequencies (Fig. 5d) in this spectrogram by means of Lorentzian curve fits (Fig. 5c) at each time-point. The standard deviation of the peak frequency is calculated to be 215 Hz along this 140-second period.

In order to better characterize the stability of the oscillation and the ability of this system to function as a sensor, we calculate the Allan deviation (square root of the two-point variance) of the frequency data, which charts the frequency deviation as a function of averaging time (Fig. 5e). It is seen that short-term and long-term frequency drifts dominate device performance. For instance, the long-term upward drift in Fig. 5d manifests as an up-turn in the Allan Deviation data (Fig. 5e) for long averaging times. The short-term frequency instabilities manifest as a large deviation for short averaging times. A ‘sweet spot’ occurs in between, indicating that a 20-s moving average of the sensor output will give us best resolution.

Operation with high-density high-viscosity liquids

We perform an experiment to prove that the optomechanical interaction can be sustained even when the motional mass is high (that is, high-density liquid) and when the fluid-related acoustic energy losses are high (that is, high viscosity). We incorporate sucrose (table sugar) into an aqueous solution inside the resonator and measure the sensitivity of the optomechanically actuated wineglass mode to the sucrose concentration of the fluid. Optomechanical oscillation is observed at all tested sucrose concentrations. The resulting relationship between acoustic frequency and the sucrose concentration exhibits a non-monotonic trend, which we plot in Fig. 6 along with a linear fit to the data. The net decreasing frequency trend is consistent with increasing effective mass of the oscillator as the fluid density increases. The visibly non-monotonic nature of the trend, however, might originate from non-perturbative high-sugar concentrations resulting in nonlinear change in frequency. For a complete model one should consider the change in the fluid properties with the sucrose concentration, including the change of speed of sound34. We note that at the highest sucrose concentration that we test in this experiment, the solution has a viscosity that is ~3-times greater than that of blood35. The actuation of optomechanical oscillation with such a high-viscosity liquid opens up the possibility for investigating the acoustic properties of viscous bio-analytes.

Figure 6: Optomechanical sensing of sucrose solutions.
figure 6

We experimentally measure the frequency of a 2.8 MHz wineglass acoustic mode (M=2) as the concentration of sucrose solution inside the μFOM resonator is varied. The size of the markers in the figure is approximately the s.d. (better than 1 kHz) of each frequency measurement. The dashed red line is a linear fit to the data, which indicates a downward trend consistent with increasing effective mass of the resonator. Resonator outer diameter is 184 μm.

Discussion

In this work, we demonstrate a bridge between optomechanics and microfluidics by confining various liquids inside a hollow microfluidic optomechanical resonator. We present experimental evidence that the optomechanical interaction in the μFOM device is dependent on the fluid contained within. These results are, therefore, a step towards novel experiments probing optomechanics on non-solid phases of matter. In particular, the high frequency, high quality-factor mechanical modes demonstrated in this work may enable strongly localized, high-sensitivity, optomechanical interaction with chemical and biological analytes36,37 as environmental parameters like pressure and cell nutrients are relatively easy to control inside the hollow resonator32,38,39, and as the liquid volume within the device is the scale of a living cell.

In contrast to other optomechanical systems that typically involve standing-wave mechanical vibrations, here circulating phonons comprises the acoustic WGMs13,22, which are essentially acoustic vortices40,41,42. These travelling-wave type acoustic modes carry angular momentum, which creates possibility of using μFOM devices to enable optomechanical interactions with vortices in various liquids43,44,45 and condensates.

Methods

Microfluidic device fabrication

The μFOM device (Fig. 1a) is fabricated with a fused-silica glass capillary that is pulled lengthwise using linear actuators, while being heated with infrared lasers (CO2 at 10.6 μm). By controlling the power of the manufacturing laser in the process of pulling, we can control the device diameter along its length. This process has also previously been developed in Sun et al.17 Optical WGMs and acoustic WGMs are simultaneously well-confined in the regions of large diameter sandwiched between regions of narrow diameter (Fig. 1d), enabling a high-degree of modal overlap. Therefore, these large diameter regions form the μFOM resonators, and multiple such resonators can be built on a single capillary.

Experimental method

The μFOM resonator is placed in close proximity (<1 μm distance) to tapered optical fibre25,26 (as shown in Fig. 1c), such that evanescent coupling from the taper allows light to be introduced and extracted from the optical WGMs of the device. A CW fibre-coupled tunable 1.5 μm laser is used as the source (Newfocus TLB-6328), and a fibre-coupled high-speed photodetector is used to monitor vibration. Mechanical vibration is stimulated within the device by pumping-specific optical resonances where the three-mode phase-match exists. The internally generated Stokes-shifted laser is then also collected by the tapered fibre, and the temporal interference of this new Brillouin laser against the partially transmitted pump laser is used to infer the mechanical response using the photodetector12,13. An optical spectrum analyser is used to verify that four-wave mixing and Raman scattering are not responsible for the beat note observed in the electrical spectrum.

Additional information

How to cite this article: Bahl, G. et al. Brillouin cavity optomechanics with microfluidic devices. Nat. Commun. 4:1994 doi: 10.1038/ncomms2994 (2013).

References

  1. Shen, Y. R. & Bloembergen, N. Theory of Stimulated Brillouin and Raman scattering. Phys. Rev. 137, A1787–A1805 (1965).

    ADS  MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Yariv, A. Quantum theory for parametric interactions of light and hypersound. IEEE J. Quant. Electron. 1, 28–36 (1965).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chiao, R. Y. Townes, C. H. & Stoicheff, B. P. Stimulated Brillouin scattering and coherent generation of intense hypersonic waves. Phys. Rev. Lett. 12, 592–595 (1964).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zel'dovich, B. Y. Popocivhec, V. I. Ragul'skii, V. V. & Faisullov, F. S. Connection between the wave fronts of the reflected and exciting light in stimulated MandelÕshtam-Brillouin scattering. JETP Lett. 15, 109 (1972).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Okawachi, Y. et al. Tunable all-optical delays via Brillouin slow light in an optical fiber. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 153902 (2005).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhang, J. -Z. & Chang, R. K. Generation and suppression of stimulated brillouin scattering in single liquid droplets. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 6, 151–153 (1989).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kuok, M. H. Lim, H. S. Ng, S. C. Liu, N. N. & Wang, Z. K. Brillouin Study of the quantization of acoustic modes in nanospheres. Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 255502 (2003).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dainese, P. et al. Stimulated Brillouin scattering from multi-GHz-guided acoustic phonons in nanostructured photonic crystal fibres. Nat. Phys. 2, 388–392 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Grudinin, I. S. Matsko, A. B. & Maleki, L. Brillouin lasing with a CaF2 whispering gallery mode resonator. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 043902 (2009).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Savchenkov, A. A. Matsko, A. B. Ilchenko, V. S. Seidel, D. & Maleki, L. Surface acoustic wave opto-mechanical oscillator and frequency comb generator. Opt. Lett. 36, 3338–3340 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Tomes, M. & Carmon, T. Photonic micro-electromechanical systems vibrating at X-band (11-GHz) rates. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 113601 (2009).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bahl, G. Tomes, M. Marquardt, F. & Carmon, T. Observation of spontaneous Brillouin cooling. Nat. Phys. 8, 203–207 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bahl, G. Zehnpfennig, J. Tomes, M. & Carmon, T. Stimulated optomechanical excitation of surface acoustic waves in a microdevice. Nat. Commun. 2, 403 (2011).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Psaltis, D. Quake, S. R. & Yang, C. Developing optofluidic technology through the fusion of microfluidics and optics. Nature 442, 381–386 (2006).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Stolyarov, A. M. et al. Microfluidic directional emission control of an azimuthally polarized radial fibre laser. Nat. Photon. 6, 229–233 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang, J. -Z. & Chang, R. K. Shape distortion of a single water droplet by laser-induced electrostriction. Opt. Lett. 13, 916–918 (1988).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sun, Y. Shopova, S. I. Wu, C. -S. Arnold, S. & Fan, X. Bioinspired optofluidic FRET lasers via DNA scaffolds. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 16039–16042 (2010).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Chang, R. K. Optical Processes in Microcavities World Scientific Publishing Company (1996).

  19. Boyd, R. W. inNonlinear Optics 3 edn Ch. 9Elsevier (2008).

  20. Yariv, A. Quantum Electronics 3 edn Wiley (1989).

  21. Matsko, A. B. Savchenkov, A. A. Ilchenko, V. S. Seidel, D. & Maleki, L. Optomechanics with surface-acoustic-wave whispering-gallery modes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 257403 (2009).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zehnpfennig, J. Bahl, G. Tomes, M. & Carmon, T. Surface optomechanics: calculating optically excited acoustical whispering gallery modes in microspheres. Opt. Express 19, 14240–14248 (2011).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Shelby, R. Levenson, M. & Bayer, P. Resolved forward Brillouin scattering in optical fibers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 939–942 (1985).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Bahl, G. Fan, X. & Carmon, T. Acoustic whispering-gallery modes in optomechanical shells. New. J. Phys. 14, 115026 (2012).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Knight, J. Cheung, G. Jacques, F. & Birks, T. Phase-matched excitation of whispering-gallery-mode resonances by a fiber taper. Opt. Lett. 22, 1129–1131 (1997).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Cai, M. & Vahala, K. Highly efficient hybrid fiber taper coupled microsphere laser. Opt. Lett. 26, 884–886 (2001).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Savchenkov, A. A. Matsko, A. B. Mohageg, M. & Maleki, L. Ringdown spectroscopy of stimulated raman scattering in a whispering gallery mode resonator. Opt. Lett. 32, 497–499 (2007).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Carmon, T. Rokhsari, H. Yang, L. Kippenberg, T. & Vahala, K. Temporal behavior of radiation-pressure-induced vibrations of an optical microcavity phonon mode. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 223902 (2005).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Rokhsari, H. Kippenberg, T. Carmon, T. & Vahala, K. Radiation-pressure-driven micro-mechanical oscillator. Opt. Express 13, 5293–5301 (2005).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kippenberg, T. J. Rokhsari, H. Carmon, T. Scherer, A. & Vahala, K. J. Analysis of radiation-pressure induced mechanical oscillation of an optical microcavity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 033901 (2005).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kim, K. H. et al. Cavity optomechanics on a microfluidic resonator with water and viscous liquids. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1205.5477 (2012).

  32. Lee, W. et al. A quasi-droplet optofluidic ring resonator laser using a micro-bubble. Appl. Phys. Lett. 99, 091102 (2011).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Rakich, P. T. Reinke, C. Camacho, R. Davids, P. & Wang, Z. Giant enhancement of stimulated brillouin scattering in the subwavelength limit. Phys. Rev. 2, 011008 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Rao, M. A. Rizvi, S. S. H. & Datta, A. K. Engineering Properties of Foods 3 edn Taylor and Francis, CRC Press (2005).

  35. Instrumentation Specialities Company. Iscotables: A handbook of Data for Biological and Physical Scientists Instrumentation Specialities Company (1989).

  36. Burg, T. P. et al. Weighing of biomolecules, single cells and single nanoparticles in fluid. Nature 446, 1066–1069 (2007).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Barton, R. A. et al. Fabrication of a nanomechanical mass sensor containing a nanofluidic channel. Nano. Lett. 10, 2058–2063 (2010).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Sumetsky, M. Dulashko, Y. & Windeler, R. S. Optical microbubble resonator. Opt. Lett. 35, 898–900 (2010).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Berneschi, S. et al. High q silica microbubble resonators fabricated by arc discharge. Opt. Lett. 36, 3521–3523 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Lugt, H. J. Vortex Flow in Nature and Technology Wiley-Interscience (1983).

  41. Sathaye, A. & Lal, A. An acoustic vortex generator for microfluidic particle entrapment. IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium 1, 641–644 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Dashti, P. Z. Alhassen, F. & Lee, H. P. Observation of orbital angular momentum transfer between acoustic and optical vortices in optical fiber. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 043604 (2006).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Feynman, R. inProgress in Low Temperature Physics Vol 1, Ch. 2,17–53 (1955).

  44. Roberts, P. H. & Donnelly, R. J. Superfluid mechanics. Annu. Rev. Fluid. Mech. 6, 179–225 (1974).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Marston, P. L. & Fairbank, W. M. Evidence of a large superfluid vortex in 4He. Phys. Rev. Lett. 39, 1208–1211 (1977).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) Optical Radiation Cooling and Heating in Integrated Devices (ORCHID) programme and through a grant from the Air Force Office of Scientific Research (AFOSR).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

G.B., K.H.K., X.F. and T.C. designed and conceived the experiments. G.B., K.H.K., W.L. and J.L. designed and developed the fabrication for the microfluidic optomechanical resonators. G.B. and K.H.K. carried out the experiments and numerical calculations. All authors jointly analysed the data, and cowrote the paper. X.F. and T.C. supervised all aspects of this project.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gaurav Bahl.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bahl, G., Kim, K., Lee, W. et al. Brillouin cavity optomechanics with microfluidic devices. Nat Commun 4, 1994 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms2994

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms2994

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing