Abstract
Bright solitons are nondispersive wave solutions, arising in a diverse range of nonlinear, onedimensional systems, including atomic Bose–Einstein condensates with attractive interactions. In reality, coldatom experiments can only approach the idealized onedimensional limit necessary for the realization of true solitons. Nevertheless, it remains possible to create bright solitary waves, the threedimensional analogue of solitons, which maintain many of the key properties of their onedimensional counterparts. Such solitary waves offer many potential applications and provide a rich testing ground for theoretical treatments of manybody quantum systems. Here we report the controlled formation of a bright solitary matterwave from a Bose–Einstein condensate of ^{85}Rb, which is observed to propagate over a distance of ∼1.1 mm in 150 ms with no observable dispersion. We demonstrate the reflection of a solitary wave from a repulsive Gaussian barrier and contrast this to the case of a repulsive condensate, in both cases finding excellent agreement with theoretical simulations using the threedimensional Gross–Pitaevskii equation.
Introduction
Solitons are nondispersive wave solutions that arise in a diverse range of nonlinear systems, stabilised by a focussing or defocussing nonlinearity. First observed in shallow water^{1}, solitons have subsequently been studied in many other fields including nonlinear optics, biophysics, astrophysics, plasma and particle physics^{2}. They are characterized by well localized wavepackets in onedimension (1D) that maintain their initial shape and amplitude for all time, even following collisions with other solitons. Bose–Einstein condensates (BECs) formed from dilute atomic gases support bright soliton solutions in 1D for attractive interatomic interactions (focussing nonlinearity), manifesting themselves as localized humps in the field amplitude. In contrast, dark solitons appear as localized reductions in an otherwise uniform field amplitude, preserved by a defocussing nonlinearity (repulsive interactions). The control with which these systems can be manipulated, combined with the unique properties of matterwave solitons, leads to a rich testing ground for theoretical descriptions of quantum manybody systems^{3,4,5}.
BECs are commonly described by a meanfield treatment^{6,7} leading to the wellknown Gross–Pitaevskii equation (GPE) in which the atomic interactions are described by a nonlinear term proportional to the swave scattering length a_{s} and the condensate density. In the 1D, homogeneous limit the GPE takes the form of a nonlinear Schrödinger equation that supports a spectrum of exact soliton solutions. Experiments approach this mathematically ideal scenario by confining the condensate in an elongated, prolate trap typically with tight radial confinement. However, this quasi1D geometry is usually accompanied by the presence of weak axial harmonic trapping, which removes the integrability of the system and prevents the appearance of true solitons. Nevertheless, solitary wave solutions remain that retain many similarities to the classical soliton solutions^{8,9,10,11}, such as propagation without dispersion. The formation of bright solitary matterwaves, the threedimensional (3D) analogue to the bright soliton solutions of the 1D nonlinear Schrödinger equation, from BECs allows one to explore an array of potential applications including novel interferometric devices^{12} using narrow Gaussian potentials as beam splitters^{13}, the study of shortrange atomsurface potentials^{14} and the realization of Schrödingercat states^{5,15}.
Previously, bright solitary matterwaves have been realised in three separate experiments using ^{7}Li (refs 16, 17) and ^{85}Rb (ref. 18). In each case, a Feshbach resonance was used to switch the interactions from repulsive (a_{s}>0) to attractive (a_{s}<0) in order to form solitary waves out of the collapse instability^{19}. In two of these experiments^{16,18}, multiple wavepackets were created, allowing the study of the dynamics during collisions in the trap. The observation of solitary waves raises many interesting questions regarding the relationship between the mathematical ideal and the experimental reality. It is unclear how solitonlike the solitary waves created in experiments with finite radial trapping and harmonic axial confinement are. An answer to this question needs to be established before potential applications utilizing solitary waves can be realised. At a more fundamental level it remains to be tested whether or not the GPE treatment fully describes the solitary waves created in experiments. Solitary waves realised experimentally typically contain ≲1,000 atoms, placing them well outside of the thermodynamic limit and potentially outside the reach of the meanfield description. Several theoretical studies of bright solitary waves beyond the meanfield description have now been performed, either including effects of quantum noise using the truncated Wigner method^{3} or using approximate analytic and numerical methods to simulate the full manybody problem^{4,5,20}. These generate results potentially in conflict with the behaviour predicted by the GPE treatment.
In this work, we report the controlled formation of bright solitary matterwaves from a ^{85}Rb BEC. The experimental geometry is such that the velocity of the wavepackets can be precisely controlled, a key factor in facilitating the future exploration of solitary wave interactions and collisions. In addition, we observe and model the controlled reflection of solitary waves from a broad Gaussian potential barrier, demonstrating their particlelike nature. These results pave the way for new experimental studies of bright solitary matterwave dynamics to elucidate the wealth of existing theoretical work.
Results
Controlled expansion of a tunable BEC
^{85}Rb is a prime candidate for solitary wave experiments owing to the existence of a broad Feshbach resonance at ∼155 G in collisions between atoms in the F=2, m_{F}=−2 state. We use this resonance to form a stable, repulsively interacting condensate in a crossed optical dipole trap, shown in Fig. 1a. The condensate is then loaded into a quasi1D waveguide, better suited geometrically to the observation of solitary waves. At the point of release into the waveguide, the magnetic bias field controlling the atomic scattering length is jumped to a new value (see Fig. 1b). As the BEC propagates along the waveguide, the value of a_{s} determines the rate of expansion of the condensate in the axial direction. We probe this expansion by measuring the condensate size (using destructive absorption imaging) as a function of time for different values of a_{s} as shown in Fig. 1c. Fitting the experimental data we can extract an expansion rate for the BEC, dependent on a_{s} and N. This is shown in Fig. 1d, along with a 3D GPE simulation of the expansion (the solid line). At a_{s}=−11 a_{0} and N=2,000 we see the expansion rate of the BEC becomes consistent with zero. This lack of dispersion with time indicates the formation of a bright solitary matterwave.
Figure 2 shows the propagation of this solitary wave, contrasted to that of a repulsively interacting BEC. As the repulsive wavepacket propagates the axial expansion causes a significant drop in optical depth not seen for the solitary wave. We observe the solitary wave propagating over a distance of 1.1 mm in a time of ∼150 ms with very little distortion.
Reflection from a broad and repulsive Gaussian barrier
To probe the stability of the solitary wave we investigate reflection of the wavepacket from a repulsive Gaussian barrier with a 1/e^{2} radius of 130 μm, shown in Fig. 3a. Figure 3b show the position of the solitary wave as a function of time in the presence of a 760 nK barrier potential. In this case, the barrier height is greater than the kinetic energy of the solitary wave and the wavepacket is cleanly reflected.
Using a barrier much wider than the solitary wave size the atomic centreofmass coordinate behaves classically, with the solitary wave acting as a single particle ‘rolling up a potential hill’. By varying the height of the potential barrier it is possible to select whether the solitary wave is reflected or allowed to travel over the barrier. The position of the solitary wave after 150 ms is shown in Fig. 3d as a function of barrier height. The solid line is a theoretical trajectory, calculated using Newtonian mechanics with no free parameters, and shows excellent agreement with the data.
In Fig. 3e we compare the effect of reflection from the barrier for a solitary wave and a repulsive BEC and contrast the change in width to the case of a repulsive BEC propagating along the waveguide in the absence of the barrier. The solid lines are the theoretical predictions for the condensate widths. We find that in the parameter regime of the experiment a 1D treatment is insufficient, and so we determine the theoretical widths using a 3D (cylindrically symmetric) GPE. This observation is consistent with other recent theoretical studies^{21}. As expected, the solitary wave is robust against collisions with a repulsive Gaussian barrier and following the reflection maintains its shape, continuing to propagate without dispersion. In the absence of the barrier, the repulsive BEC expands steadily in time. (We attribute the disagreement between experiment and theory at longer times to a small thermal component making the measurement of the condensate width less accurate.) In the barrier reflection case, an oscillation in the condensate width is induced as a result of the larger spatial extent of the repulsive BEC causing it to be strongly compressed as it is reflected from the barrier. Such contrast in the behaviour of the repulsive BEC and the solitary wave reflection lends weight to previous theoretical prediction regarding the superior characteristics of solitary waves for observing quantum reflection from surfaces^{14}.
Discussion
There is currently much theoretical interest^{21,22,23,24,25} in the scattering of solitary waves from narrow potential barriers where, if the barrier width is on the order of the solitary wave width, quantum effects are observable. At high kinetic energy, soliton splitting is energetically allowed at narrow repulsive barriers. The effect of quantum tunnelling means the barrier can act as a beam splitter, dividing the soliton into two parts^{13,22}. These multiple wavepackets can then be used to investigate the phase dependence of binary collisions^{23}, the behaviour of collisions of two solitary waves on a barrier^{22,24} and would provide a solid first step towards the realization of a bright solitary wave interferometer. In the limit of low kinetic energy, a meanfield GPE treatment of the problem begins to break down^{26} and quantum behaviour, (described in the 1D limit by the LiebLiniger Hamiltonian^{27}), becomes more significant. Here, splitting of the soliton is energetically forbidden and it becomes possible to create Schrödingercat states^{5,15}.
The use of a narrow potential to controllably split a solitary wave presents an opportunity to investigate one of the key open questions arising from previous work; what governs the dynamics and stability of multiple solitary waves existing in the same trap? The longlived nature of the solitary waves and their apparent stability during binary collisions has been the subject of a wealth of theoretical work^{3,28,29,30,31}. Within the framework of the GPE, the observed stability of soliton collisions can only be explained by imposing a relative phase ϕ=π between neighbouring solitary waves^{16,28,30} such that the collisions are effectively repulsive in character^{32}. This stabilizes the solitons as it avoids the formation of a large density peak which may lead to collapse^{8,23,30,33}. Several other studies address the apparent stability of solitary waves in binary collisions, offering different interpretations, which do not require the imposition of a relative phase ϕ=π between neighbouring solitary waves. The inclusion of quantum noise^{3} or accounting for manybody effects^{4} both result in effectively repulsive interactions between solitary waves, irrespective of initial phase. Interestingly, incoherent, fragmented objects are also predicted to form in the manybody formalism^{4}. Further experimental studies are undoubtedly required to address the role of the relative phase in solitary wave collisions and to test the different theoretical descriptions of quantum manybody systems.
Although reflection and splitting experiments show the potential to settle the theoretical debate over the solitary wave formation and dynamics, the ability to probe such narrow and hence rapidly varying potentials using these wavepackets also lends itself to an obvious application in precision measurement. Atoms close to a surface are subject to the shortrange Casimir–Polder and van der Waals potentials, which can be measured using the classical and quantum reflection of bright solitary matterwaves^{14}. Our apparatus includes a superpolished Dove prism for such studies, see Fig. 1a. Further in the future, the ability to deliver and manipulate ultracold atoms near to a solid surface may open up new routes to probe shortrange corrections to gravity^{34} due to exotic forces beyond the Standard Model.
Methods
Production of a tunable BEC
We create a BEC with tunable atomic interactions using the method described in ^{35}. A magnetic Feshbach resonance is used to tune both the elastic and inelastic scattering properties of the atomic sample to achieve efficient evaporation. Importantly, the resonance at 155 G in collisions between ^{85}Rb atoms in the F=2, m_{F}=−2 state gives control over the swave scattering length close to the zero crossing of ∼40 a_{0}/G.
The use of a magnetic Feshbach resonance means it is advantageous to work with a levitated crossed optical dipole trap. This is formed from a single 10.1 W, λ=1,064 nm laser beam (IPG: YLR151064LPSF) used in a bowtie configuration as shown in Fig. 1a. The term ‘levitated’ refers to the use of an additional magnetic quadrupole field whose vertical gradient is set to just less than that required to support atoms against gravity. This trap allows the magnetic field, and hence scattering length, to be changed independently of the trapping frequencies.
Loading the optical waveguide
To investigate the creation of solitary waves we begin by forming a BEC containing up to 10,000 atoms at a scattering length of a_{s}≈300 a_{0}. The crossed beam trap in which the BEC is created has a roughly spherically symmetric geometry at the point of condensation, with final trap frequencies of ω_{x,y,z}=2π × (31, 27, 25) Hz. This trap is illsuited to the observation of bright solitary matterwaves and thus we transfer the condensate into a more quasi1D waveguide created by an additional 1,064 nm laser beam, focused to a waist of 117 μm and intersecting the crossed trap at 45° to each beam. This enters the glass science cell through the back surface of an antireflection coated fused silica Dove prism (to be later used for the study of atomsurface interactions^{14}).
To load the condensate into the waveguide the scattering length is ramped close to a_{s}=0 in 50 ms thus reducing the condensate size and creating a BEC approximately in the harmonic oscillator ground state of the crossed trap. The BEC is then held for 10 ms to allow the magnetic field to stabilize before simultaneously switching the waveguide beam on, the crossed beams off and jumping the quadrupole gradient in the vertical direction from B′=21.5 G cm^{−1} to 26 G cm^{−1}. Although it is advantageous in terms of the evaporation to be under levitated during the condensation phase, we must increase the gradient once we wish to transfer the atoms. This ensures a truer levitation of the atoms in the waveguide trap, thus maximizing the trap depth of the beam. In addition, the presence of the quadrupole gradient provides much of the, albeit weak, axial trapping along the beam, Hz (ref. 37). Here, μ is the magnetic moment of atoms with mass m and B_{0} is the magnetic bias field. The waveguide beam itself contributes <0.1 Hz to the axial trapping, hence the magnetic confinement dominates in this direction. At a beam power of 0.17 W, the waveguide and quadrupole potential produce a trap of ω_{x,y,z}=2π × (1, 27, 27) Hz. Here, the radial trap frequency (ω_{y,z}) approximately matches that of the crossed beam trap at the point of condensation.
Propagation in the waveguide
A small offset (2.6 mm) between the crossed dipole trap, that is, the waveguide loading position, and the quadrupole centre means that once loaded into the waveguide, the BEC propagates freely towards the magnetic field minimum along the direction of the waveguide, undergoing harmonic motion. As the BEC propagates its rate of expansion in the axial direction is determined by the scattering length. Although strictly speaking the expansion is nonlinear over the fullrange of times measured, a linear approximation is valid over the range 10 ms<t<100 ms from which we can extract a ‘rate’.
Control of the solitary wave velocity
The position of the magnetic field zero in the axial direction of the waveguide can be displaced by an amount determined by the magnetic field gradient in this direction, B′/2, and a moderate offset field, B_{offset}, according to Δx=B_{offset}/(B′/2) (ref. 37). In this way, the amplitude, and hence velocity, of the solitary wave motion can be precisely controlled due to the dominance of the magnetic potential over the optical confinement of the waveguide along the axial direction. The maximum velocity is given by v=Aω_{axial}, where A is the amplitude of the motion, set by the separation between the minimum of the magnetic potential along the axis of the waveguide and the release point from the crossed dipole trap. Using this technique the solitary wave can reach velocities of tens of mm s^{−1} when travelling through the centre of the harmonic potential or, alternatively, be brought to a near standstill, achieving velocities <0.5 mm s^{−1}.
Classical reflection from a Gaussian barrier
To produce the repulsive potential barrier we use a 532 nm Gaussian laser beam (derived from a Laser Quantum Finesse laser), focussed to a waist of 131 μm horizontally and 495 μm vertically, with a power of up to 2 W. The barrier is aligned to cross the waveguide in the horizontal plane at an angle of ∼45° and is offset by 455 μm from where the BEC is released from the crossed dipole trap, see Fig. 3a. This angle is restricted by the available optical access close to the trap centre.
Theoretical modelling
The release of the BEC into the waveguide potential, and its subsequent expansion, was modelled at zerotemperature by solving the GPE in 3D using a cylindrically symmetric Fourier pseudospectral method. In all cases, the initial noninteracting ground state of a harmonic trap with axial (radial) frequency 30 (27) Hz (corresponding to the crossed dipole trap potential) was released instantaneously into another harmonic trap with axial (radial) frequency 1 (27) Hz and offset by 2.6 mm along the axial direction (corresponding to the waveguide potential). The scattering length was instantaneously changed to the appropriate value of a_{s} at the time of release.
In cases where the barrier was present this was modelled as a Gaussian ‘lightsheet’ potential centred on a plane perpendicular to the axial direction, offset from the initial harmonic trap by 2.145 mm, and with height 760 nK and width μm. Compared with the experimental barrier beam, this model neglects the vertical width of the beam, which is large compared with the radial extent of the BEC in the waveguide, and includes the geometric factor to account for the 45° angle of the beam.
Expansion rates were calculated from the fullwidth at half maximum of the BEC axial density profile predicted by the GPE (obtained by integrating over the radial coordinate) after 10 and 100 ms of expansion. In all cases, the change in radius over this time interval was approximately linear. For the simulations in Fig. 3e, the width was calculated by convolving the BEC axial density profile predicted by the GPE with a 10 μm width Gaussian (to account for finite imaging resolution), and fitting a Gaussian distribution to the resulting profile using nonlinear leastsquares.
Additional information
How to cite this article: Marchant, A. L. et al. Controlled formation and reflection of a bright solitary matterwave. Nat. Commun. 4:1865 doi: 10.1038/ncomms2893 (2013).
References
Russell J. S. Report on waves. In Report of the Fourteenth Meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science 311–390(John Murray, 1845); http://go.nature.com/Ozdafg
Dauxois T. & Peyrard M. Physics of Solitons Cambridge University Press (2006).
DabrowskaWüster B. J., Wüster S. & Davis M. J. Dynamical formation and interaction of bright solitary waves and solitons in the collapse of BoseEinstein condensates with attractive interactions. New J. Phys. 11, 053017 (2009).
Streltsov A. I., Alon O. E. & Cederbaum L. S. Formation and dynamics of manyboson fragmented states in onedimensional attractive ultracold gases. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 130401 (2008).
Weiss C. & Castin Y. Creation and detection of a mesoscopic gas in a nonlocal quantum superposition. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 010403 (2009).
Pethick C. J. & Smith H. BoseEinstein Condensation in Dilute Gases Cambridge University Press (2001).
Pitaevskii L. & Stringari S. BoseEinstein Condensation Clarendon Press: Oxford, (2003).
Billam T. P., Marchant A. L., Cornish S. L., Gardiner S. A. & Parker N. G. Bright solitary matter waves: formation, stability and interactions. In Progress in Optical Science and Photonics, Vol. 1, Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking, SelfTrapping and Josephson Oscillations ed. Malomed B. A. Springer: Berlin, Heidelberg, (2013).
Salasnich L., Parola A. & Reatto L. Effective wave equations for the dynamics of cigarshaped and diskshaped Bose condensates. Phys. Rev. A 65, 043614 (2002).
Malomed B. A., Mihalache D., Wise F. & Torner L. Spatiotemporal optical solitons. J. Opt. B Quantum Semiclassical Opt. 7, R53–R72 (2005).
Billam T. P., Wrathmall S. A. & Gardiner S. A. Variational determination of approximate bright matterwave soliton solutions in anisotropic traps. Phys. Rev. A 85, 013627 (2012).
Cronin A. D., Schmiedmayer J. & Pritchard D. E. Optics and interferometry with atoms and molecules. Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 1051–1129 (2009).
Dyke P., Sidong L., Pollack S., Dries D. & Hulet R. Interactions of bright matterwave solitons with a barrier potential. In 42nd Annual Meeting of the APS Division of Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics Vol. 56,, OPE.10 (APS, 2011)
Cornish S. L. et al. Quantum reflection of bright matterwave solitons. Physica D 238, 1299–1305 (2009).
Streltsov A. I., Alon O. E. & Cederbaum L. S. Scattering of an attractive BoseEinstein condensate from a barrier: formation of quantum superposition states. Phys. Rev. A 80, 043616 (2009).
Strecker K. E., Partridge G. B., Truscott A. G. & Hulet R. G. Formation and propagation of matterwave soliton trains. Nature 417, 150–153 (2002).
Khaykovich L. et al. Formation of a matterwave bright soliton. Science 296, 1290–1293 (2002).
Cornish S. L., Thompson S. T. & Wieman C. E. Formation of bright matterwave solitons during the collapse of attractive BoseEinstein condensates. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 170401 (2006).
Ruprecht P. A., Holland M. J., Burnett K. & Edwards M. Timedependent solution of the nonlinear Schrödinger equation for Bosecondensed trapped neutral atoms. Phys. Rev. A 51, 4704–4711 (1995).
Holdaway David I. H., Weiss C. & Simon A. Gardiner Quantum theory of bright matterwave solitons in harmonic confinement. Phys. Rev. A 85, 053618 (2012).
Cuevas J., Kevrekidis P. G., Malomed B. A., Dyke P. & Hulet R. G. Interactions of solitons with a Gaussian barrier: splitting and recombination in quasi1d and 3d. Preprint at http://arXiv.org/abs/1301.3959 (2013).
Helm J. L., Billam T. P. & Gardiner S. A. Bright matterwave soliton collisions at narrow barriers. Phys. Rev. A 85, 053621 (2012).
Billam T. P., Cornish S. L. & Gardiner S. A. Realizing brightmatterwavesoliton collisions with controlled relative phase. Phys. Rev. A 83, 041602 (2011).
Martin A. D. & Ruostekoski J. Quantum dynamics of atomic bright solitons under splitting and recollision, and implications for interferometry. New J. Phys. 14, 043040 (2012).
Ernst T. & Brand J. Resonant trapping in the transport of a matterwave soliton through a quantum well. Phys. Rev. A 81, 033614 (2010).
Gertjerenken B., Billam T. P., Khaykovich L. & Weiss C. Scattering bright solitons: quantum versus meanfield behavior. Phys. Rev. A 86, 033608 (2012).
Lieb E. H. & Liniger W. Exact analysis of an interacting bose gas. I. the general solution and the ground state. Phys. Rev. 130, 1605–1616 (1963).
Al Khawaja U., Stoof H. T. C., Hulet R. G., Strecker K. E. & Partridge G. B. Bright soliton trains of trapped BoseEinstein condensates. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 200404 (2002).
Parker N. G., Martin A. M., Adams C. S. & Cornish S. L. Bright solitary waves of trapped atomic BoseEinstein condensates. Physica D 238, 1456–1461 (2009).
Parker N. G., Martin A. M., Cornish S. L. & Adams C. S. Collisions of bright solitary matter waves. J. Phys. B Atom. Mol. Opt. Phys. 41, 045303 (2008).
Carr L. D. & Brand J. Spontaneous soliton formation and modulational instability in BoseEinstein condensates. Phys. Rev. Lett 92, 040401 (2004).
Gordon J. P. Interaction forces among solitons in optical fibers. Opt. Lett. 8, 596–598 (1983).
Khaykovich L. & Malomed B. A. Deviation from one dimensionality in stationary properties and collisional dynamics of matterwave solitons. Phys. Rev. A 74, 023607 (2006).
Dimopoulos S. & Geraci A. A. Probing submicron forces by interferometry of BoseEinstein condensed atoms. Phys. Rev. D 68, 124021 (2003).
Marchant A. L., Händel S., Hopkins S. A., Wiles T. P. & Cornish S. L. BoseEinstein condensation of ^{85}Rb by direct evaporation in an optical dipole trap. Phys. Rev. A 85, 053647 (2012).
Lin Y. J., Perry A. R., Compton R. L., Spielman I. B. & Porto J. V. Rapid production of ^{87}Rb BoseEinstein condensates in a combined magnetic and optical potential. Phys. Rev. A 79, 063631 (2009).
Marchant A. L., Händel S., Wiles T. P., Hopkins S. A. & Cornish S. L. Guided transport of ultracold gases of rubidium up to a roomtemperature dielectric surface. New J. Phys. 13, 125003 (2011).
Acknowledgements
We thank J.L. Helm, D.I.H. Holdaway and C. Weiss for many useful discussions. We acknowledge financial support from the UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC grant EP/F002068/1) and the European Science Foundation within the EUROCORES Programme EuroQUASAR (EPSRC grant EP/G026602/1). T.P.B. was supported by The Marsden Fund of New Zealand (UOO162), and The Royal Society of New Zealand (UOO004). S.A.G. was supported by EPSRC grant EP/G056781/1 and Royal Society of London grant IE110202. The data presented in this paper are available upon request.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
A.L.M. performed the experiments and data analysis. T.P.B. carried out the numerical simulations. T.P.W. and M.M.H.Y. assisted with the development of the apparatus. S.A.G. provided theoretical support. S.L.C. conceived and managed the project. A.L.M., T.P.B. and S.L.C. prepared the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Marchant, A., Billam, T., Wiles, T. et al. Controlled formation and reflection of a bright solitary matterwave. Nat Commun 4, 1865 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms2893
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms2893
This article is cited by

Spontaneous symmetry breaking induced by interaction in linearly coupled binary Bose–Einstein condensates
Nonlinear Dynamics (2023)

Realizing a 1D topological gauge theory in an optically dressed BEC
Nature (2022)

Splitting and recombination of brightsolitarymatter waves
Communications Physics (2020)

Vortex conveyor belt for matterwave coherent splitting and interferometry
Scientific Reports (2019)

The energy fluxes of surface waves propagating along the interface between nonlinear media with different characteristics
Pramana (2019)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.