Article | Published:

A troodontid dinosaur from the latest Cretaceous of India

Nature Communications volume 4, Article number: 1703 (2013) | Download Citation



Troodontid dinosaurs share a close ancestry with birds and were distributed widely across Laurasia during the Cretaceous. Hundreds of occurrences of troodontid bones, and their highly distinctive teeth, are known from North America, Europe and Asia. Thus far, however, they remain unknown from Gondwanan landmasses. Here we report the discovery of a troodontid tooth from the uppermost Cretaceous Kallamedu Formation in the Cauvery Basin of South India. This is the first Gondwanan record for troodontids, extending their geographic range by nearly 10,000 km, and representing the first confirmed non-avian tetanuran dinosaur from the Indian subcontinent. This small-bodied maniraptoran dinosaur is an unexpected and distinctly ‘Laurasian’ component of an otherwise typical ‘Gondwanan’ tetrapod assemblage, including notosuchian crocodiles, abelisauroid dinosaurs and gondwanathere mammals. This discovery raises the question of whether troodontids dispersed to India from Laurasia in the Late Cretaceous, or whether a broader Gondwanan distribution of troodontids remains to be discovered.


Theropod dinosaurs dominated terrestrial ecosystems, especially within predatory niches, for much of the Mesozoic, attaining a cosmopolitan distribution by the Early Jurassic. Within Theropoda, however, there are clear palaeogeographic divisions, especially among faunas from the Late Cretaceous (100.5–65.5 million years ago, or Megannum (hereafter, Ma))1,2. For example, abelisauroids make a substantial contribution to theropod diversity in the Late Cretaceous of Gondwana, with abelisauroid occurrences in South America, Africa, Madagascar, India and Europe3. However, noasaurids, a clade of small-bodied abelisauroids, are not confidently known from Laurasia4. Instead, small-bodied Laurasian theropods of this age are exclusively maniraptorans, representing the ecologically diverse theropod clade that includes birds. Only a depauperate maniraptoran assemblage is known from the Cretaceous of Gondwana, comprising birds, alvarezsaurids and endemic unenlagiine dromaeosaurids2,5, and thus far lacking several groups, including the close avian relatives Troodontidae. The only specimen of a possible Gondwanan troodontid described to date, a manual ungual from the Cretaceous of Sudan6, likely represents a noasaurid abelisauroid instead7.

Tetanurae, a large, globally distributed dinosaur group that includes Maniraptora and most Cretaceous theropod diversity is not yet known from Mesozoic deposits of the Indian subcontinent8. Although many Indian dinosaur remains discovered over the last two centuries were originally identified as coelurosaurian or ‘carnosaurian’ theropods (for example, in a study by Huene and Matley9), these taxa have since been redescribed as abelisauroids, including some small-bodied noasaurids3,10 and, in the case of a Late Triassic specimen11, as a basal saurischian12. Indeed, at present the earliest record of tetanurans in India is an Eocene bird13. Whether the Mesozoic absence in India of this large and common dinosaur clade is the result of historically limited sampling or represents a real palaeobiogeographic pattern has remained uncertain.

Late Cretaceous vertebrate faunas of India hail almost entirely from infra- and intertrappean deposits in the Deccan volcanic province. These beds have yielded several theropod taxa, including Indosuchus, Indosaurus14, Rajasaurus15 and Rahiolisaurus16, as well as the only confirmed Gondwanan eutherian mammals17,18,19,20,21. In contrast to the relatively rich record from infra- and intertrappean beds of Central India, comparatively few vertebrate fossils22,23 have been described from the Cauvery Basin, comprising an extensive sequence of Early Cretaceous to Early Palaeocene fossiliferous sediments in Tamil Nadu, South India24 (Fig. 1). Since 2007, we have engaged in a comprehensive survey of the Cretaceous vertebrate fauna of the Cauvery Basin, which thus far has yielded hexanchid, lamniform, and hybodontiform sharks and ichthyosaurs from the marine deposits of the Cenomanian Karai Formation25,26 and abelisauroid dinosaurs, Simosuchus-like notosuchian crocodyliforms and indeterminate ganoid fishes, anurans, crocodyliforms and turtles from the continental deposits of the Late Maastrichtian-aged (about 70.6–65.5 Ma) Kallamedu Formation27. Most of the terrestrial taxa occurring in the Kallamedu Formation are also previously known from the sedimentary beds of the Deccan volcanic province or from other Gondwanan continents, and the Simosuchus-like notosuchian indicates close faunal affinities with Madagascar in particular27.

Figure 1: Late Cretaceous distribution of Troodontidae.
Figure 1

(a) Palaeogeographic reconstruction of the latest Cretaceous (65.5 Ma) showing previously known occurrences of Troodontidae (yellow circles) and location of the new specimen described here (yellow star). Occurrence data were downloaded from the Paleobiology Database on 30 November 2012 using the group name ‘Troodontidae’ and the following parameter: time interval, Late Cretaceous. Inset shows locality information for the Kallamedu Formation field site in the Cauvery Basin, Tamil Nadu, South India, projected on approximate palaeocoastline. Palaeogeographic map modified from reconstructions by Ron Blakey, NAU Geology (

Here we describe an unusual dinosaurian tooth recovered by screenwashing at a microvertebrate site in the Kallamedu Formation that differs markedly from any previously known specimens from the Indian subcontinent or its palaeogeographic neighbours. This new specimen is identified as a troodontid dinosaur, representing the first record of Troodontidae in Gondwana and the first Mesozoic maniraptoran, and tetanuran, from India. This new discovery expands the Cretaceous geographic range of troodontids by nearly 10,000 km and further complicates understanding of the origin and affinities of India’s Cretaceous fauna.


Geological setting

The Cauvery Basin is a large northeast-southwest trending structure that formed during the Late Jurassic–Early Cretaceous rifting of India and Australia-Antarctica28. The sedimentary succession has been divided into three lithostratigraphic units: the Uttatur Group, the Trichinopoly Group and the Ariyalur Group, in ascending superpositional order. The focus of this study is on the youngest of these units, the Ariyalur Group, which is extensively exposed to the east and northeast of the town of Ariyalur. The dinosaurian tooth described here was recovered from screenwashing of 300 kg of sandy clays from the Kallamedu Formation, which forms the uppermost beds of the Ariyalur Group and has been assigned a Late Maastrichtian age based on planktonic foraminferans29,30. The Kallamedu Formation is exposed in a restricted area to the northeast of the small village of Kallamedu, 10 km north of Ariyalur (Fig. 1), and consists of conspicuous red clays, friable sandstones and sandy clays, which have been interpreted as representing a fluvial, flood-plain environment in a coastal setting31. Before our current survey27, vertebrate fossil discoveries from the Kallamedu Formation were limited to fragmentary material of indeterminate sauropod and theropod dinosaurs23,32 and well-preserved crania and postcrania of a bothremydid turtle22.

Institutional abbreviations

DUGF, Delhi University, Geology Department, Fossil Catalogue, Delhi, India.

Systematic palaeontology

Referred material

One isolated tooth (DUGF/52).

Formation and age

Kallamedu Formation, Ariyalur Group, Late Maastrichtian age.


DUGF/52 measures 2.8 mm in fore-aft basal length and 3.5 mm in height. It is lanceolate and labiolingually compressed, with a slight lingual inclination. It has a lenticular cross-section, with an anterior keel. The apex is recurved, with a convex mesial carina, in labial or lingual view (Fig. 2a). The distal carina is only weakly concave, appearing almost straight in labial or lingual view, and is inclined more steeply than the mesial carina. An apicobasally oriented buttress is apparent medially on the lingual surface, and the lingual surface is concave mesially and distally to this buttress (Fig. 2c). The labial surface of the tooth is convex mesiodistally. A mesiodistal constriction is observed at the base of the crown.

Figure 2: New troodontid dinosaur from the latest Cretaceous of India.
Figure 2

Troodontid tooth DUGF/52 in (a) labial, (b) lingual and (c) occlusal views, as well as a higher magnification view (d) of the distal denticles showing clear and well-formed interdenticle grooves despite abrasion (scale bar: 300 microns). a, b and c are shown at a uniform scale (with 1 mm scale bar). Images were obtained using a scanning electron microscope housed in the Department of Earth Sciences, University College London.

The denticles are apically inclined, and relatively large, with a maximum apicobasal length of 0.25 mm at approximately midlength of both carinae. This length decreases towards the tooth apex and base. The denticles of the distal carina project further mesiodistally from the crown than do those of the mesial carina (Fig. 2d). Thus, the distal denticles appear larger in both lingual and labial views. The distal carina bears denticles along its entire height, to the basal constriction. However, the mesial carina seems to have terminated before reaching the base (although the situation is slightly obscured by damage to the base of the tooth, this morphology appears to be genuine). The denticles on the mesial carina have straight mesial borders and have a parallelogram-shaped outline in labial view due to their apical inclination (of approximately 45°). They are longer apicobasally than mesiodistally. The distal carina denticles have rounded distal margins and are longer mesiodistally than apicobasally. These denticles are perpendicular to the long axis of the crown at the base of the carina, but are slightly apically inclined midlength along the carina. Grooves are well-developed between adjacent denticles, reaching the base of the denticles on both carina, but do not extend onto the crown surface (Fig. 2d).

DUGF/52 resembles the teeth of troodontids, a maniraptoran clade known only from North America and Eurasia, in the presence of a lingual buttress, presence of a basal constriction, the shape in labial view (which is most similar to the mesial maxillary and equivalent dentary teeth of troodontids33,34), and the proportional size and apical inclination of the denticles. The proportional denticle size relative to the fore-aft basal length of the tooth is most similar to the troodontid Sinornithoides youngi5,34, a basal troodontid from China (although it differs in the presence of denticles on both carinae, they are absent on the mesial carina of S. youngi). The distal denticles of DUGF/52 do not appear to be strongly hooked, unlike in some troodontids35, but these denticles are abraded and incomplete (Fig. 2). Furthermore, this morphology is present only in some derived troodontids34,36.


Isolated theropod teeth are notoriously difficult to assign to specific taxa, and a number of other dinosaurian, and reptilian, taxa bear some, but not all, of these features. However, the suite of characters described here are unknown in any other Cretaceous reptile clade and strongly support an assignment of this specimen to Troodontidae. For example, troodontid teeth show some resemblance to those of the extant squamate Iguana iguana37, but among Cretaceous squamates, Iguana-like (lanceolate, denticulate) teeth are only known in the boreoteiioid Kuwajimalla kagaensis38. However, the basal constriction of K. kagaensis is weak and occurs over a proportionally longer apicobasal distance, the crown lacks substantial apicodistal curvature, and the denticles of both carinae are of similar size and are more strongly inclined apically. Russell and Dong39 noted similarity between some therizinosaur theropod teeth and those of troodontids. However, therizinosaurs also differ from DUGF/52 in lacking substantial apicodistal curvature and having mesial and distal denticles of similar size and stronger apical inclination39,40,41. Finally, although the teeth of some Late Triassic and Early Jurassic ornithischian and sauropodomorph dinosaurs had Iguana-like characters, some of which are shared with troodontids37,42, these taxa were extinct by the Cretaceous. Moreover, while superficially similar, the teeth of all of these older taxa differ from troodontids in possessing only weak apical recurvature and more strongly apically inclined denticles.

Among theropod dinosaurs known from other Gondwanan continents, none compare favourably with DUGF/52. Abelisauroids, including small noasaurids such as those previously described from India and Madagascar15,43,44,45, could be considered the most likely possibility, but they are markedly different from DUGF/52 in dental morphology, most obviously in denticle size and crown height. The only other Gondwanan maniraptorans identified at present are dromaeosaurids, known mainly from Argentina46, as well as from India’s close Cretaceous neighbour Madagascar47,48. However, their teeth also bear much smaller denticles (or lose them entirely) and higher crowns, as well as lacking a constriction between the base and root, and thus are distinct from the specimen described here46. Unnamed maniraptorans from the Lower Cretaceous of Australia are known only from isolated postcrania49 and so cannot be directly compared with DUGF/52.

Enamel microstructure has recently been suggested as a phylogenetically informative character for some dinosaurian clades50. Unfortunately, theropods display a large amount of homoplasy in these characters, and troodontids in particular are highly variable. The lack of diagnostic enamel microstructure for this clade argues against destructive sampling of the sole known specimen of this first Gondowanan troodontid, and India’s first Mesozoic avetheropod, at present, but future discoveries may allow for further analysis along these lines.

The identification of a troodontid dentary tooth represents an unusual and surprising extension of the palaeogeographic and temporal range of this predominantly Laurasian clade into the Late Cretaceous of India. This discovery demonstrates that the faunas of poorly sampled Gondwanan regions (for example, India, Madagascar or Australia) may deviate from the classic African and South American fauna that informs the most widely held hypotheses of Cretaceous terrestrial biogeography1. Indeed, new discoveries of Gondwanan, as well as Laurasian, dinosaurs have increasingly challenged the simple model of an endemic Gondwanan terrestrial vertebrate fauna throughout the Cretaceous49. The presence of troodontids also further confounds biogeographic reconstructions of Late Cretaceous India. Fossil discoveries have demonstrated that India’s fauna was dominated by the expected primarily or exclusively Gondwanan clades (for example, notosuchian crocodyliforms, gondwanathere mammals and abelisauroid dinosaurs27) in the Late Cretaceous, but this simple biogeographic pattern has already been complicated by the presence of gobiatine frogs and possible anguimorph lizards51 of Laurasian origin, and at least one other predominantly or even exclusively Laurasian clade, eutherian mammals, represented by Deccanolestes (although there is debate over an enigmatic therian mammal from the Late Cretaceous of Madagascar52,53).

Palaeogeographic reconstructions of Late Cretaceous India are also hotly contested. Some reconstructions suggest that India was connected to East Africa via the Oman-Kohistan-Dras Island Arc in the latest Cretaceous54, whereas another suggests that it remained connected to Antarctica into the Late Cretaceous55. Still another analysis differs in reconstructing India as being at its peak isolation in the latest Cretaceous, with only indirect connection to Africa by overwater dispersal via Madagascar, from 83.5 Ma (ref. 56). Connections to Laurasian continents are even more unlikely in that reconstruction, with India separated from any northern island arcs by an estimated 1,500 km of ocean.

While these vast oceanic barriers may have prevented dispersal of large vertebrates between Gondwanan landmasses57, or directly between India and Laurasian continents in the latest Cretaceous, the presence of definitive eutherian mammals in the latest Cretaceous of India demonstrates that at least some small terrestrial vertebrates were likely dispersing between India, Africa and Europe, directly or indirectly, during the Late Cretaceous17,20,21. The presence of a troodontid dinosaur in the latest Cretaceous of India may thus be the outcome of a dispersal event from Laurasia to India, or indicate an undersampled Gondwanan distribution for Cretaceous troodontids, consistent with the recent discovery of non-dromaeosaurid maniraptorans in Early Cretaceous deposits of Australia49. As troodontids are known from the Middle Jurassic58, it is possible that the presence of troodontids in India is the result of vicariance or dispersal before India’s Late Cretaceous isolation. Although its explanation remains to be further tested, this unexpected new Indian discovery dramatically expands the known distribution of Troodontidae and suggests that further exploration of Gondwanan fossil localiities, particularly for small vertebrates, may dramatically alter current understanding of vertebrate biogeography and the evolution of major dinosaurian and other vertebrate clades.


Surface prospecting and specimen recovery

Surface prospecting was undertaken in a large exposure of the Kallamedu Formation (Fig. 1) during expeditions in 2007, 2009 and 2010, which revealed a large concentration of highly fragmentary large bones that likely represent dinosaur taxa and have been previously identified as titanosaur sauropods32. In addition, microsites with concentrations of ganoid fish scales, turtle carapace fragments, and abelisaurid theropod and crocodilian teeth27 were identified during surface prospecting. The specimen described here was recovered during screenwashing of material gathered from one such microsite.

Additional information

How to cite this article: Goswami, A. et al. A troodontid dinosaur from the latest Cretaceous of India. Nat. Commun. 4:1703 doi: 10.1038/ncomms2716 (2013).


  1. 1.

    & in Fourth Symposium on Mesozoic Terrestrial Ecosystems eds Currie P. J., Koster E. H. 24–29Tyrell Museum of Palaeontology (1987).

  2. 2.

    , & The earliest dromaeosaurid theropod from South America. Nature 437, 1007–1011 (2005).

  3. 3.

    & The phylogeny of Ceratosauria (Dinosauria: Theropoda). J. Syst. Palaeontol. 6, 183–236 (2008).

  4. 4.

    , & New dinosaurs link southern landmasses in the mid-Cretaceous. Proc. R. Soc. Biol. Sci. Ser. B 271, 1325–1330 (2004).

  5. 5.

    , & A review of dromaeosaurid systematics and paravian phylogeny. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 381, 1–206 (2012).

  6. 6.

    & First record of the family Dromaeosauridae (Dinosauria: Theropoda) in the Cretaceous of Gondwana (Wadi Milk Formation, northern Sudan). Paläont. Z 69, 475–489 (1995).

  7. 7.

    & The position of the claws in Noasauridae (Dinosauria: Abelisauroidea) and its implications for abelisauroid manus evolution. Paläont. Z 84, 293–300 (2010).

  8. 8.

    , & The phylogeny of Tetanurae (Dinosauria: Theropoda). J. Syst. Palaeontol. 10, 211–300 (2012).

  9. 9.

    & The Cretaceous Saurischia and Ornithischia of the central provinces of India. Palaeont. Indica 21, 1–74 (1933).

  10. 10.

    , & in Dinosaurs and Other Extinct Saurians: A Historical Perspective Vol.343 (eds Moody R. T. J., Buffetaut E., Naish D., Martill D. M. 161–173Geological Society Special Publications (2010).

  11. 11.

    in Gondwana Six: Stratigraphy, Sedimentology, and Paleontology Vol. 41, ed. McKenzie G. D. 183–189Geophys. Monog. Ser. (1987).

  12. 12.

    in The Dinosauria eds Weishampel D. B., Dodson P., Osmolska H. 25–46University of California Press (2004).

  13. 13.

    , , & Oldest fossil avian remains from the Indian subcontinental plate. Curr. Sci. 92, 1266–1269 (2007).

  14. 14.

    Indosuchus and Indosaurus, Cretaceous carnosaurs from India. J. Paleontol. 52, 570–580 (1978).

  15. 15.

    et al. A new abelisaurid (Dinosauria, Theropoda) from the Lameta Formation (Cretaceous, Maastrichtian) of India. Contrib. Mus. Paleontol. Univ. Mich 31, 1–41 (2003).

  16. 16.

    , , & in New Aspects of Mesozoic Biodiversity ed. Bandyopadhyay S. 45–62Springer (2010).

  17. 17.

    et al. A radiation of basal arboreal mammals beginning in the late Cretaceous of India. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 16333–16338 (2011).

  18. 18.

    & First Cretaceous mammal from India. Nature 332, 638–340 (1988).

  19. 19.

    & Late Cretaceous continental vertebrate fossil record from India: paleobiogeographical insights. Bull. Soc. Geol. Fr. 180, 369–381 (2009).

  20. 20.

    , & Euarchontan affinity of Paleocene Afro-European adapisoriculid mammals and their origin in the late Cretaceous Deccan Traps of India. Naturwissenschaften 97, 417–422 (2010).

  21. 21.

    et al. First mammal evidence for the Late Cretaceous of India for biotic dispersal between India and Africa at the K/T transition. C.R. Palevol 9, 63–71 (2010).

  22. 22.

    , & Kurmademys, a new side-necked turtle (Pelomedusoides: Bothremydidae) from the Late Cretaceous of India. Am. Mus. Novit. 3321, 1–16 (2001).

  23. 23.

    & A carnosaurian dinosaur from the Kallamedu Formation (Maastrichtian horizon), Tamil Nadu. Geol. Surv. Ind. Spec. Publ. 11, 523–528 (1987).

  24. 24.

    The Cretaceous dinosaurs of the Trichinopoly district and the rocks associated with them. Rec. Geol. Surv. Ind. 61, 337–349 (1929).

  25. 25.

    , , , & Marine vertebrates from ‘middle’ Cretaceous (Early Cenomanian) of South India. J. Vertebr. Paleontol. 31, 539–552 (2011).

  26. 26.

    , , & Ptychodus decurrens Agassiz (Elasmobranchii: Ptychodontidae) from the Upper Cretaceous of India. Cretac. Res. 33, 183–188 (2012).

  27. 27.

    , , & A new Late Cretaceous vertebrate fauna from the Cauvery basin, South India: implications for Gondwanan palaeobiogeography. J. Vertebr. Paleontol (in press) .

  28. 28.

    , & Pre-breakup continental extension in east Gondwnaland and the early opening of the Indian Ocean. Tectonophysics. 15, 261–283 (1988).

  29. 29.

    & Biostratigraphy of the Ariyalur stage, Cretaceous of Trichinopoly. J. Palaeont. Soc. Ind. 12, 48–54 (1967).

  30. 30.

    , , & A lithostratigraphic revision and palaeoenvironmental assessment of the Cretaceous system exposed in the onshore Cauvery Basin, southern India. Cretac. Res. 22, 743–762 (2001).

  31. 31.

    , & in Contributions to the XV Indian Colloquium on Micropaleontology and Stratigraphy eds Pandey J., Azmi R. J., Bhandari A., Dave A. 789–800(Wadia Institute of Himalayan Geology, Dehradun (1996).

  32. 32.

    , Notices of new and other Vertebrata from Indian Tertiary and Secondary rocks. Rec. Geol. Surv. Ind. 10, 30–43 (1877).

  33. 33.

    , , , & A new troodontid theropod from the Late Cretaceous of central China and the radiation of Asian troodontids. Acta Palaeontol. Pol. 55, 381–388 (2010).

  34. 34.

    & New information on Cretaceous troodontids (Dinosauria, Theropoda) from the People’s Republic of China. Can. J. Earth Sci. 38, 1753–1766 (2001).

  35. 35.

    , Bird-like characteristics of the jaws and teeth of troodontid theropods (Dinosauria, Saurischia). J. Vertebr. Paleontol. 7, 72–81 (1987).

  36. 36.

    , , & Osteology and relationships of Bryonosaurus jaffei (Theropoda: Troodontidae). Am. Mus. Novit. 3402, 1–21 (2003).

  37. 37.

    , in Evolution of Herbivory in Terrestrial Vertebrates: Perspectives from the Fossil Record ed. Sues H.-D. 42–78Cambridge University Press (2000).

  38. 38.

    & An early herbivorous lizard from the Lower Cretaceous of Japan. Palaeontology. 51, 487–498 (2008).

  39. 39.

    & The affinities of a new theropod from the Alxa Desert, Inner Mongolia, People’s Republic of China. Can. J. Earth Sci. 30, 2107–2127 (1994).

  40. 40.

    & First definitive therizinosauroid (Dinosauria; Theropoda) from North America. J. Vertebr. Paleontol. 21, 410–414 (2001).

  41. 41.

    , & The skull of Erlicosaurus andrewsi, a Late Cretaceous ‘segnosaur’ (Theropoda: Therizinosauridae) from Mongolia. Am. Mus. Novit. 3115, 1–39 (1994).

  42. 42.

    , Late Triassic microvertebrates from the Lower Chinle Group (Otischalkian-Adamanian: Carnian), southwestern USA. New Mex. Mus. Nat. Hist. Sci. Bull. 27, 1–170 (2004).

  43. 43.

    , & New materials of Masiakasaurus knopfleri Sampson, Carrano, and Forster, 2001, and implications for the morphology of the Noasauridae (Theropoda: Ceratosauria). Smithson. Contrib. Paleobiol. 95, 1–53 (2011).

  44. 44.

    , & A bizarre predatory dinosaur from the Late Cretaceous of Madagascar. Nature. 409, 504–506 (2001).

  45. 45.

    Small theropod dinosaurs from the latest Cretaceous of India. J. Vertebr. Paleontol Program and Abstracts 194, (2012).

  46. 46.

    , , , & A bizarre Cretaceous theropod dinosaur from Patagonia and the evolution of Gondwanan dromaeosaurids. Proc. R. Soc. Biol. Sci. Ser. B. 276, 1101–1107 (2009).

  47. 47.

    , , & The theropod ancestry of birds: new evidence from the Late Cretaceous of Madagascar. Science. 279, 1915–1919 (1998).

  48. 48.

    & Theropod tooth assemblages from the Late Cretaceous Maevarano Formation and the possible presence of dromaeosaurids in Madagascar. Acta Palaeontol. Pol. 52, 155–166 (2007).

  49. 49.

    , , & Theropod fauna from southern Australia indicates high polar diversity and climate-driven dinosaur provinciality. PLoS ONE 7, e37122 (2012).

  50. 50.

    , The evolution of dinosaur tooth enamel microstructure. Biol. Rev. 86, 183–216 (2011).

  51. 51.

    & Amphibians and squamates from Maastrichtian of Naskal, India. Cretac. Res. 1, 95–107 (1995).

  52. 52.

    , & Placental nature of the alleged marsupial from the Cretaceous of Madagascar. Acta Palaeontol. Pol. 48, 149–151 (2003).

  53. 53.

    Fossil molar from a Madagascan marsupial. Nature. 412, 497–498 (2001).

  54. 54.

    & The breakup of Gondwana and the evolution and biogeography of the Indian plate. Proc. Indian Natl. Sci. Acad. Part A Phys. Sci. 65, 397–425 (1999).

  55. 55.

    , & New aeromagnetic data from the western Enderby Basin and consequences for Antarctic-India break-up. Geophys. Res. Lett. 37, L21311 (2010).

  56. 56.

    & Gondwana to Asia: Plate tectonics, paleogeography and the biological connectivity of the Indian sub-continent from the Middle Jurassic through latest Eocene (166–35 Ma). Earth-Sci. Rev. 88, 145–166 (2008).

  57. 57.

    & Late Cretaceous bioconnections between Indo-Madagascar and Antarctica: refutation of the Gunnerus Ridge causeway hypothesis. J. Biogeogr. 38, 1855–1872 (2011).

  58. 58.

    et al. Reduced plumage and flight ability of a new Jurassic paravian theropod from China. Nat. Commun. 4, 1394 (2013).

Download references


We thank K. Sivakumar, T. Ayyamperumal, P.S. Senthil Kumar, K. Anbarasu and the students of the Department of Geology at National College, Tiruchirapalli, for essential help with logistics and assistance during field collection of material. We thank P. Barrett, A. Heckert, M. Carrano, M. Norell, J. Wilson, S. Evans and J. Sankey for helpful discussions and J. Davy for help with scanning electron microscopy. A.G. acknowledges support from the Linnean Society’s Percy Sladen Memorial Fund, the King’s College Bedford Fund and the Leverhulme Trust (Research Grant RPG-129). G.V.R.P. acknowledges support from the J.C. Bose National Fellowship, Department of Science and Technology (DST), New Delhi. O.V. is thankful to DST for financial support in the form of Fast Track Project (no. SR/FTP/ES-33/2008). J.J.F. is grateful for support from the Frick Fund in the Division of Paleontology, American Museum of Natural History.

Author information


  1. Department of Genetics, Evolution, and Environment, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK

    • A. Goswami
  2. Department of Earth Sciences, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK

    • A. Goswami
  3. Department of Geology, Centre for Advanced Studies, University of Delhi, New Delhi 110 007, India

    • G. V. R. Prasad
  4. Geology Discipline Group, School of Sciences, Indira Gandhi National Open University, New Delhi 110 068, India

    • O. Verma
  5. Division of Paleontology and Richard Gilder Graduate School, American Museum of Natural History, New York, New York 10024, USA

    • J. J. Flynn
  6. Department of Earth Sciences, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3AN, UK

    • R. B. J. Benson


  1. Search for A. Goswami in:

  2. Search for G. V. R. Prasad in:

  3. Search for O. Verma in:

  4. Search for J. J. Flynn in:

  5. Search for R. B. J. Benson in:


A.G. and G.V.R.P. designed research. A.G., G.V.R.P., O.V. and J.J.F. conducted fieldwork. A.G., G.V.R.P., O.V. and R.B.J.B. performed research. A.G., R.B.J.B., G.V.R.P. and J.J.F. wrote the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Goswami.

About this article

Publication history






By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.