Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Observation of longitudinal and transverse self-injections in laser-plasma accelerators

Abstract

Laser-plasma accelerators can produce high-quality electron beams, up to giga electronvolts in energy, from a centimetre scale device. The properties of the electron beams and the accelerator stability are largely determined by the injection stage of electrons into the accelerator. The simplest mechanism of injection is self-injection, in which the wakefield is strong enough to trap cold plasma electrons into the laser wake. The main drawback of this method is its lack of shot-to-shot stability. Here we present experimental and numerical results that demonstrate the existence of two different self-injection mechanisms. Transverse self-injection is shown to lead to low stability and poor-quality electron beams, because of a strong dependence on the intensity profile of the laser pulse. In contrast, longitudinal injection, which is unambiguously observed for the first time, is shown to lead to much more stable acceleration and higher-quality electron beams.

Introduction

Laser-plasma accelerators1,2 have gained considerable attention for their potential in delivering, with a compact setup, quasi-monoenergetic3,4,5, low emittance6,7,8, giga-electronvolt electron beams9. The few femtosecond duration of the accelerated electrons bunches10, associated to a peak current of a few kiloamps, make these accelerators of particular interest for applications11, such as studies of electron-induced damage in biological tissues at very high dose rate12, or short wavelength, femtosecond and micrometre-source-size light beams13,14,15,16,17,18,19. The development of these accelerators has however been hindered by a lack of stability of the acceleration and a poor control on the electron features. These problems can be largely traced back to the injection of electrons in the plasma wake driven by the laser pulse. Electron trapping is generally achieved by the wave-breaking of the plasma wake, a process that is by nature uncontrollable and leads generally to poor-quality electrons. Controlled injection techniques, for example colliding pulse injection20, ionization-induced injection21 and density-gradient injection22, have been developed to overcome this shortcoming.

These methods offer an improved control on the acceleration and lead to better electron features, but they imply generally complex setups. For this reason, self-injection remains the most common method for injecting electrons in the plasma wake. Two distinct physical mechanisms can be distinguished: longitudinal and transverse self-injection. In longitudinal self-injection, the trajectory of injected electrons is mainly longitudinal, with a negligible transverse motion. As shown by the schematic in Fig. 1a, the injected electrons pass through the laser pulse and gain energy while crossing the plasma wave. When they reach the rear of the first plasma period, their velocity exceeds the wake-phase velocity and the electrons are eventually injected. The only electrons that are trapped are those that were initially close to the axis (r0) where the laser intensity and the wakefield amplitude are the highest and where the ponderomotive force is small. The longitudinal self-injection mechanism is analogous to one-dimensional longitudinal wave-breaking23. In contrast, transverse self-injection24 is a multi-dimensional effect. It occurs in the bubble regime25,26,27, where the laser ponderomotive force expels electrons from the propagation axis and forms an electron-free cavity in its wake. As shown in Fig. 1b, the injected electrons are initially located at approximately one laser waist from the axis (rw0). They circulate around the laser pulse and the bubble, and attain a velocity larger than the wake-phase velocity when reaching the axis at the rear of the bubble28,29,30. Except in a few papers (for example, 6), trapping of quasi-monoenergetic electrons is generally attributed to transverse self-injection.

Figure 1: Schematic for longitudinal and transverse self-injections.
figure 1

(a) Typical trajectory of an injected electron in the longitudinal self-injection mechanism. (b) Typical trajectory of an injected electron in the transverse self-injection mechanism. The blue colour scale represents the electron density. The red to yelow colour scale indicates the laser intensity. The trajectories are given by the green lines.

This article presents experimental and simulation results, which demonstrate that depending on laser and plasma parameters, electrons can be trapped either via longitudinal or transverse self-injection. These two types of injection are associated with energetic electrons with different properties, which allow them to be identified unambiguously. First, we show that in some conditions, electrons can be trapped successively by longitudinal followed by transverse self-injection. The experimental observation of this phenomenon was made possible by the use of a gas cell with an adjustable length. Second, we prove that trapping via longitudinal self-injection provides a stable and tunable source of energetic electrons.

Results

Self-injection mechanisms

Transverse self-injection is known from three-dimensional particle-in-cell (PIC) simulations to be the most efficient trapping mechanism in the wake of an ultrashort laser pulse25,27,28,29. We show here that this injection can be preceded by a noticeable trapping via longitudinal self-injection. We focus first on PIC simulations. As the aberrations on the laser beam are known to have a role on electron injection31,32, the transverse profile of laser intensity used in the simulation was taken from experimental data (Fig. 2a). The laser has a elliptical shape with some contribution of high-order modes.

Figure 2: PIC simulation of the interaction.
figure 2

(a) Focal spot-intensity distribution, taken from experimental data. (b) Evolution of the normalized laser amplitude. The coloured areas indicate the injection regions. (c, d) Distribution of the transverse positions from which electrons injected in the first (c) and second bunches (d) originate (the density is in arbitrary units). The 1/e2 contours of the laser-pulse head are indicated in violet. The laser waist is smaller in d than in c, because of self-focusing.

Figure 2b shows the evolution of the normalized laser amplitude a0 for a 30-fs laser pulse, with an initial amplitude a0=2, propagating in a plasma with density n0=1019 cm−3 (see Methods for details on the simulation). The laser pulse undergoes three cycles of focusing–defocusing because of relativistic self-focusing and self-steepening, leading to multiple injection33,34. A 2-pC bunch is injected very early in the propagation, before the first self-focusing peak, whereas a much more charged bunch (200 pC) is injected around the second self-focusing peak. A less charged bunch is injected around the third self-focusing peak.

The initial spatial distributions in the transverse plane of the electrons that are eventually injected are shown in Fig. 2c for the first and the second bunches, respectively. Electrons in the second bunch originate from positions close to the laser waist, as expected in the case of trapping by transverse self-injection29. In contrast, electrons in the first bunch come from regions close to the axis. When these electrons are injected, the laser spot radius is large and a0 is still low (a02.5); hence, the radial ponderomotive force close to the axis is small. Thus, on-axis electrons are only weakly deviated when crossing the laser pulse, and they remain in the region of largest accelerating field Ez. Moreover, the laser amplitude increases steeply in the region of first injection because of laser self-focusing (see Fig. 2b). This reduces the wake-phase velocity via the relativistic shift of the plasma wavelength λp35. The strongly reduced wake-phase velocity lowers the threshold for trapping, such that electrons can catch up the plasma wave and be injected despite a low a0, similarly to density-gradient injection22.

Figure 2b shows that the conditions required to trigger longitudinal injection are fulfilled during 40 μm only. In contrast, transverse injection occurs on 240 μm. As a result, longitudinal injection leads to the acceleration of quasi-monoenergetic electron beams, whereas transverse injection generally results in the production of broadband electron spectra. Figure 2 also indicates that longitudinal injection takes place at the very beginning of the interaction (after 200 μm of laser propagation), whereas transverse injection is triggered after significant self-focusing of the laser. As the charge in the second bunch is much larger than in the first bunch, only transverse injection is observed in experiments where the plasma length is typically in the range 2−10 mm.

A second feature visible in Fig. 2d is the strong asymmetry on the initial spatial distribution of electrons in the second bunch, when transverse injection models predict an even distribution around the laser waist29. This asymmetry is due to the asymmetry on the laser intensity distribution close to the waist, which breaks the cylindrical symmetry of the plasma cavity. Small changes in the focal spot lead to significant variations of the transverse distribution. Transverse injection is, hence, intrinsically unstable.

To observe experimentally sequential longitudinal and transverse injections, we used the “Salle jaune” 30 TW laser system to accelerate electrons in a gas cell, for which the length can be adjusted from 200 μm up to 10 mm (see Methods). Typical experimental electron spectra, obtained for different cell lengths L and for an electron density ne1.1 × 1019 cm−3, are plotted in Fig. 3a. For short lengths,  mm, spectra consist of quasi-monoenergetic beams with a charge in the 2–10 pC range. For L=1.4 mm, a second electron bunch, with a low energy, is observed. This second bunch is then accelerated to higher energy as the cell length is increased. It exhibits a broad spectrum and has a charge one order of magnitude higher than the first bunch, in the 50–100 pC range. The mean cut-off energies measured for the two electron bunches are shown in Fig. 3b. The low-charge (first) bunch reaches a maximum energy of 250 MeV for L1 mm. Then it decreases from L=1.4 mm, indicating that this bunch has outrun the plasma wave and entered a dephasing region where it is decelerated by the wakefield1. In contrast, the energy of the high-charge bunch keeps increasing up to 270 MeV for L=5 mm. As a result, the energy of the high-charge bunch overtakes the one of the low charge, for L=2.1 mm, preventing the detection of the first bunch for long plasmas.

Figure 3: Electron spectra for ne1.1 × 1019 cm−3.
figure 3

(a) Typical single-shot spectra for different cell lengths. (b) Mean 5% cut-off energy as a function of the cell length. The error bar is the s.e.m. The solid line is a parabolic fit, the dashed line is a visual guide. The peak accelerating electric field is  GV m1 for the first bunch and  GV m1 for the second bunch.

The analysis of the electron spectra clearly demonstrates the sequential injection of two electron bunches, with different charge yields and injection positions, but it does not give much insight on the injection mechanisms. More information can be obtained by analysing the betatron X-ray radiation, which arises from the transverse oscillations of accelerated electrons in the wake36,13. The angular profile of the X-ray emission depends on the electron distribution in the transverse-phase space, and as such can reveal important information on the transverse properties of the electron bunch37. X-ray beam angular profiles, presented in Fig. 4, show that the betatron radiation produced by the two bunches has very different features. The X-ray beams radiated by the high-charge bunch (Fig. 4e–h) are more intense, exhibit a lack of simple symmetry, off-centre intensity peaks, flattened transverse profiles and are constantly changing in shape. In contrast, the low-charge bunch emits very stable elliptical X-ray beams (Fig. 4a–d) with Gaussian profile and major axis along the laser polarization (see Fig. 4i). The observed difference in intensity are essentially because of the variation of the electron bunch charge.

Figure 4: X-ray beam angular profiles for ne1.1 × 1019 cm−3.
figure 4

Typical angular profiles emitted by the low-charge bunch for L1.2 mm (ad) and the high-charge bunch for L4 mm (eh). The field of view in each image is 44 mrad × 44 mrad and the colour scale gives the number of counts recorded by the X-ray charge-coupled device, divided by 1,000. Photon noise is reduced by a mean filter, and contour lines at 50, 90 and 98% are shown for each image. Transverse axis and are defined in d, where is the laser polarization direction. (i) Lineout in the direction (integrated over 2.25 mrad in the direction) of image d and h, and a Gaussian fit of the d lineout.

The asymmetry and shot-to-shot fluctuations of the X-ray beam profiles radiated by the high-charge bunch suggest that its transverse distribution is also asymmetric and fluctuating, as expected for transverse injection (see Fig. 2d). To confirm that the high-charge bunch in the experiment was actually trapped by transverse self-injection, we computed the X-ray emission radiated by the first and second injected bunches in Fig. 2. The results presented in Fig. 5 show that the X-ray beam emitted by the longitudinally injected bunch (first bunch) is elliptic and Gaussian, just as the X-ray beams emitted by the low-charge bunch in Fig. 4a–d. The ellipse major axis is along the laser polarization in both cases. The beam profile ellipticity seems larger in simulation, suggesting that the electron bunch interacts more with the laser pulse in the simulation than in the experiment, probably because of slightly different conditions. The X-ray beam emitted by transversely injected electrons in Fig. 5b is asymmetric, presents off-centre intensity peaks and a somewhat flattened profile. These features are similar to that of the experimental profiles in Fig. 4e–h, confirming that the electrons emitting these X-ray beams were trapped by transverse self-injection.

Figure 5: Calculated X-ray beam profiles.
figure 5

The X-ray beam profiles are calculated from electron trajectories coming from PIC simulation, for the first (a) and the second (b) bunches shown in Fig. 2. Contour lines at 50, 90 and 98% are shown.

In summary, we observed in both experiment and simulation a double injection. The first injection is due to longitudinal self-injection. It occurs very early in the laser propagation and leads to a charge of a few pC. The electron distribution is symmetric and stable shot-to-shot. The second injection is due to transverse self-injection. It occurs after significant laser self-focusing and leads to a charge of about 100 pC. The electron distribution in this case is asymmetric and changes shot-to-shot, because it depends strongly on the laser intensity profile at the injection time.

A stable and tunable accelerator

Figure 4 showed that longitudinal injection yields much more stable electron beam properties than transverse injection. These properties can be further improved by reducing the electron density. Experimental electron spectra from five consecutive shots, obtained for ne7 × 1018 cm−3 and L=2.7 mm, are presented in Fig. 6a. They illustrate the good stability of the accelerator. For this density, only longitudinal injection is observed, probably because laser self-focusing is not strong enough to get transverse injection. The root-mean-square fluctuations of the peak energy are 4%, which is of the same order of magnitude as the laser amplitude fluctuations. A similar stability is observed for all cell lengths. The measured beam charge is about 5 pC for all cell lengths, with root-mean-square shot-to-shot variations of 25%. The probability of injection is 100%. The divergence of the electron beam is smaller than 2 mrad full width at half maximum (FWHM), limited by the resolution of the detector, and the energy spread is in the range 50–70 MeV FWHM.

Figure 6: Electron spectra for ne7 × 1018 cm−3.
figure 6

(a) Five consecutive raw electron spectra, for L=2.7 mm. (b) Mean deconvoluted spectrum. The grey area indicates the s.d. band. (c) Mean 5% cut-off energy as a function of the cell length. The error bar is the s.e.m. The parabolic fit for L<5 mm (red line) leads to  GV m1.

X-ray measurements in Fig. 7 show stable and close-to-Gaussian X-ray beam profiles, confirming the longitudinal self-injection mechanism for electron trapping. Compared with ne1.1 × 1019 cm−3, observed X-ray divergences are reduced down to 10 mrad FWHM. This indicates that the electron beam has a very small transverse emittance. The latter can be estimated as follows. The Gaussian X-ray beam profile is consistent with a Maxwell–Boltzmann electron beam distribution in the transverse-phase space. In this case, the spatial variances σa with (a=x,y) and the angular variances of the electron beam are linked by with α the normalized amplitude of the transverse focusing force inside the plasma cavity (α≤1 with α=1 for a fully evacuated cavity). The normalized transverse emittance in absence of spatial–angular correlations is . Considering that our experiment works close to full blow-out with α[0.5,1], we estimate ɛn[0.57,0.81] π mm mrad, which is comparable to the smallest emittances measured in laser-plasma accelerators6,7,8.

Figure 7: X-ray beam properties for ne7 × 1018 cm−3.
figure 7

(a, b) Two typical X-ray beam angular profiles past the dephasing length (scales and image processing are identical to Fig. 4).

Reducing the density should, in principle, increase the peak electron energy. Yet, Figs 3b and 6c show that the measured peak energy is almost the same for both densities. The accelerating fields EZ in both cases can be estimated from the parabolic fits in Figs 3b and 6c. According to Lu’s model38, the longitudinal electric field EZ should vary as (a0ne)1/2. Therefore, for a constant a0, EZ should be divided by 1.3 when ne is divided by 1.6. In contrast, our measurements reveal that EZ is divided by 3.1. This strong decrease of EZ is the main reason for the saturation of the peak electron energy at low density. Several effects may explain the decrease of EZ. For instance, the laser intensity reached after laser pulse self-focusing and self-steepening, and the residual electron density in the plasma cavity can depend strongly on the plasma density. Departure from a perfect bubble, a0 dynamics and temporal evolution of the wakefield could also contribute to explain the large variations of EZ. In any case, the results show that the physics is more complex than suggested by simple scaling laws.

Discussion

To improve the performance of laser-plasma accelerators and develop their applications, a precise understanding of the physics of these accelerators is mandatory, and increasing efforts have been devoted toward this goal39,40,41,42. Here we used a gas cell with an adaptable length to directly observe the injection, acceleration and dephasing of electrons. We demonstrated that electrons can be trapped either via longitudinal or transverse self-injection, and that these two types of injection lead to energetic electrons having very different features. Transverse injection is well suited for applications that require a high charge (100 pC), but can cope with little stability, a large energy spread and a mediocre emittance. In contrast, longitudinal injection is ideal for applications in which a good stability and a low emittance are essential.

Method

PIC simulations

Three-dimensional, fully electromagnetic PIC simulations were performed with the numerical code Calder Circ, described in 43, which uses a Fourier decomposition of the electromagnetic fields in the azimuthal direction with respect to the laser-propagation direction. Seven Fourier modes (m=0 to m=6) were included in the simulations. The laser wavelength λ0=800 nm, the normalized laser peak amplitude a0=2, the duration is 30 fs FWHM and the spatial intensity profile is taken as the projection over the modes of the experimental laser spot (shown in Fig. 2a). The mesh consists of 5,000 (in z) × 600 (in r) cells. The cell size is 0.096λ0/2π (in z) × 1.5λ0/2π (in r) and the time step is 0.066λ0/2πc. Positive ions are considered in the simulations as a uniform frozen background. The number of electron macroparticles per cell is 750. The longitudinal plasma profile consists of a 65 μm long linear ramp followed by a 1.5-mm long plateau with density n0=0.006nc=9.6 × 1018 cm−3.

Laser system

The experiment was conducted at Laboratoire d'Optique Appliquée with the “Salle Jaune” Ti:Sa laser system, which delivers 1 J on target with a FWHM pulse duration of 35 fs and a linear polarization. The laser pulse was focused at the entrance of the gas cell with a 70-cm focal length off-axis parabola, to a FWHM focal spot size of 20 μm. From the measured intensity distribution in the focal plane, the peak intensity was estimated to be 4 × 1018 W cm−2, corresponding to a normalized amplitude of a0=1.4.

Gas cell

The target was a cell filled with neutral helium gas and whose back face can be translated continuously under vacuum, allowing to change its length in the laser-propagation direction. The front face of the cell is fixed to keep the same focal plane position with respect to the target entrance. The front and back faces had a 500-μm diameter hole, respectively, for the entrance of the laser pulse in the gas cell and for the exit of the electron and X-ray beams. A characterization of the gas cell atomic density realized by interferometry showed a flat longitudinal density profile and yielded the calibration between backing pressure and electron density.

Electron and X-ray beam diagnostics

The electron spectrometer consisted of a permanent bending magnet (1.1 T over 10 cm), which deflects electrons depending on their energy, and a Lanex phosphor screen, which convertsfraction of the electron energy into 546 nm light imaged by a 16 bits visible charge-coupled device camera. X-ray beams were measured with an X-ray charge-coupled device camera with 2,048 × 2,048 pixels of size 13.5 × 13.5 μm2), set at 60 cm from the gas cell and protected from the laser light by a 12 μm Al filter.

Additional information

How to cite this article: Corde, S. et al. Observation of longitudinal and transverse self-injections in laser-plasma accelerators. Nat. Commun. 4:1501 doi: 10.1038/ncomms2528 (2012).

References

  1. Tajima, T. & Dawson, J. M. Laser electron accelerator. Phys. Rev. Lett. 43, 267–270 (1979).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Esarey, E., Schroeder, C. B., Leemans, W. P. Physics of laser-driven plasma-based electron accelerators. Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 1229–1285 (2009).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Faure, J. et al. A laser-plasma accelerator producing monoenergetic electron beams. Nature (London) 431, 541–544 (2004).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Geddes, C. G. R. et al. High-quality electron beams from a laser wakefield accelerator using plasma-channel guiding. Nature (London) 431, 538–541 (2004).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mangles, S. P. D. et al. Monoenergetic beams of relativistic electrons from intense laser-plasma interactions. Nature (London) 431, 535–538 (2004).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Brunetti, E. et al. Low emittance, high brilliance relativistic electron beams from a laser-plasma accelerator. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 215007 (2010).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Plateau, G. R. et al. Low-emittance electron bunches from a laser-plasma accelerator measured using single-shot X-ray spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 064802 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Weingartner, R. et al. Ultralow emittance electron beams from a laser-wakefield accelerator. Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 15, 111302 (2012).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Leemans, W. P. et al. Gev electron beams from a centimetre-scale accelerator. Nat. Phys. 2, 696–699 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lundh, O. et al. Few femtosecond, few kiloampere electron bunch produced by a laser-plasma accelerator. Nat. Phys. 7, 219–222 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Malka, V. et al. Principles and applications of compact laser-plasma accelerators. Nat. Phys. 4, 447–453 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rigaud, O. et al. Exploring ultrashort high-energy electron-induced damage in human carcinoma cells. Cell Death Dis. 1, e73 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Rousse, A. et al. Production of a kev X-ray beam from synchrotron radiation in relativistic laser-plasma interaction. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 135005 (2004).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kneip, S. et al. Bright spatially coherent synchrotron X-rays from a table-top source. Nat. Phys. 6, 980–983 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Nakajima, K. Compact X-ray sources: Towards a table-top free-electron laser. Nat. Phys. 4, 92–93 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Schlenvoigt, H. P. et al. A compact synchrotron radiation source driven by a laser-plasma wakefield accelerator. Nat. Phys. 4, 130–133 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Fuchs, M. et al. Laser-driven soft-X-ray undulator source. Nat. Phys. 5, 826–829 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Klopper, A. Plasma screening. Nat. Phys. 7, 743–743 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ta Phuoc, K. et al. All-optical Compton gamma-ray source. Nat. Photonics 6, 308–311 (2012).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Faure, J. et al. Controlled injection and acceleration of electrons in plasma wakefields by colliding laser pulses. Nature (London) 444, 737–739 (2006).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Pollock, B. B. et al. Demonstration of a narrow energy spread, 0.5 gev electron beam from a two-stage laser wakefield accelerator. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 045001 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Gonsalves, A. J. et al. Tunable laser plasma accelerator based on longitudinal density tailoring. Nat. Phys 7, 862–866 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Akhiezer, A. I. & Polovin, R. V. Theory of wave motion of an electron plasma. Sov. Phys. JETP 3, 696–705 (1956).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Bulanov, S. V., Pegoraro, F., Pukhov, A. M., Sakharov, A. S. Transverse-wake wave breaking. Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 4205–4208 (1997).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Pukhov, A. & Meyer-ter Vehn, J. Laser wake field acceleration: the highly non-linear broken-wave regime. Appl. Phys. B Lasers Opt. 74, 355–361 (2002).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhidkov, A., Koga, J., Hosokai, T., Kinoshita, K. & Uesaka, M. Effects of plasma density on relativistic self-injection for electron laser wake-field acceleration. Phys. Plasmas 11, 5379–5386 (2004).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lu, W., Huang, C., Zhou, M., Mori, W. B. & Katsouleas, T. Nonlinear theory for relativistic plasma wakefields in the blowout regime. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 165002 (2006).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Tsung, F. S. et al. Simulation of monoenergetic electron generation via laser wakefield accelerators for 5–25 tw lasers. Phys. Plasmas 13, 056708 (2006).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kostyukov, I., Nerush, E., Pukhov, A. & Seredov, V. Electron self-injection in multidimensional relativistic-plasma wake fields. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 175003 (2009).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Wu, H.-C. et al. Electron trajectories and betatron oscillation in the wake bubble in laser-plasma interaction. Phys. Plasmas 16, 073108 (2009).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Glinec, Y. et al. Direct observation of betatron oscillations in a laser-plasma electron accelerator. EPL (Europhys. Lett. 81, 64001 (2008).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Mangles, S. P. D. et al. Controlling the spectrum of x-rays generated in a laser-plasma accelerator by tailoring the laser wavefront. Appl. Phys. Lett. 95, 181106 (2009).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Yoshitama, H. et al. Physics of gases, plasmas, and electric discharges: self-injection and acceleration of monoenergetic electron beams from laser wakefield accelerators in a highly relativistic regime. Chin. Phys. Lett. 25, 2938–2941 (2008).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Oguchi, A. et al. Multiple self-injection in the acceleration of monoenergetic electrons by a laser wake field. Phys. Plasmas 15, 043102 (2008).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Kalmykov, S. Y. et al. Numerical modelling of a 10-cm-long multi-gev laser wakefield accelerator driven by a self-guided petawatt pulse. N. J. Phys. 12, 045019 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Kiselev, S., Pukhov, A., Kostyukov, I. X-ray generation in strongly nonlinear plasma waves. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 135004 (2004).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Ta Phuoc, K. et al. Imaging electron trajectories in a laser-wakefield cavity using betatron X-ray radiation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 225002 (2006).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Lu, W. et al. Generating multi-gev electron bunches using single stage laser wakefield acceleration in a 3d nonlinear regime. Phys Rev. ST Accel. Beams 10, 061301 (2007).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Hsieh, C.-T. et al. Tomography of injection and acceleration of monoenergetic electrons in a laser-wakefield accelerator. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 095001 (2006).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Matlis, N. H. et al. Snapshots of laser wakefields. Nat. Phys. 2, 749–753 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Buck, A. et al. Real-time observation of laser-driven electron acceleration. Nat. Phys. 7, 543–548 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Corde, S. et al. Mapping the x-ray emission region in a laser-plasma accelerator. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 215004 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Lifschitz, A. F. et al. Particle-in-Cell modelling of laser-plasma interaction using Fourier decomposition. J. Comput. Phys. 228, 1803–1814 (2009).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the European Research Council (PARIS ERC, contract number 226424) and EuCARD/ANAC, EC FP7 (contract number 227579). It was partly performed using high-performance computing resources of GENCI (grant number 2012-056304).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

S.C., C.T., G.L. and K.T.P conceived and realized the experiment. S.C. and C.T. analysed the data. A.L and X.D performed the simulations. S.C., C.T., A.L., X.D., R.L. and V.M. discussed the results. S.C., C.T., A.L. and R.L wrote the paper. G.L. and D.D. designed the gas cell. V.M and A.R. provided overall guidance to the project.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Thaury.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Corde, S., Thaury, C., Lifschitz, A. et al. Observation of longitudinal and transverse self-injections in laser-plasma accelerators. Nat Commun 4, 1501 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms2528

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms2528

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing