Abstract
Magnetodielectric small spheres present unusual electromagnetic scattering features, theoretically predicted a few decades ago. However, achieving such behaviour has remained elusive, due to the nonmagnetic character of natural optical materials or the difficulty in obtaining lowloss highly permeable magnetic materials in the gigahertz regime. Here we present unambiguous experimental evidence that a single lowloss dielectric subwavelength sphere of moderate refractive index (n=4 like some semiconductors at nearinfrared) radiates fields identical to those from equal amplitude crossed electric and magnetic dipoles, and indistinguishable from those of ideal magnetodielectric spheres. The measured scattering radiation patterns and degree of linear polarization (3–9 GHz/33–100 mm range) show that, by appropriately tuning the a/λ ratio, zerobackward (‘Huygens’ source) or almost zeroforward (‘Huygens’ reflector) radiated power can be obtained. These Kerker scattering conditions only depend on a/λ. Our results open new technological challenges from nano and microphotonics to science and engineering of antennas, metamaterials and electromagnetic devices.
Introduction
Electromagnetic scattering by small particles compared with the wavelength is a topic of great interest to fields extending from telecommunications, astrophysics or meteorology to biophysics and material science^{1,2,3}. The increasing demand of wireless device miniaturization for communication and sensor applications, and the search of new materials with electromagnetic properties ‘à la carte’, has fostered a renewed interest in subwavelength particles as basic building blocks for controlling optical radiation at subwavelength scales. These issues underline the emerging concepts of metamaterial inspired microwave and radiowave electrically small antennas^{4} and their optical analogues, either dielectric^{5,6} or based on plasmon subwavelength optics^{7}.
A key ingredient for relevant applications involves an optimal design of the electric and magnetic responses to the incident electromagnetic wave in small structures of lossless magnetodielectric materials. Hypothetical particles exhibiting both electric and magnetic dipolar resonances scatter with coherent effects between both dipoles, hence their use enables control of the scattered radiation, as predicted long ago by Kerker et al.^{8}; that is, under certain conditions for the values of the electric permittivity ε and magnetic permeability μ (known as ‘Kerker conditions’), the response of a particle to planewave illumination consists of equal amplitude crossed electric and magneticinduced dipoles. When they oscillate inphase, the scattered fields are mainly in the direction of the incoming wave, with zerobackward radiated power, (‘first Kerker’ or ‘zerobackward intensity condition’) and correspond to an ideal ‘Huygens’ secondary source^{9}. Such sources are interesting as elements of electrically small antennas^{10,11}. Correspondingly, at the ‘second Kerker condition’ (or ‘nearzeroforward intensity condition’) the dipoles are outofphase, (‘Huygens reflector’), which opens intriguing applications for metamaterials and cloaking^{12}. However, achieving such magnetodielectric behaviour has been prevented because of the absence of natural magnetic media at optical frequencies and to the lossy magnetic materials in the microwave regime. Recent reports on the observation of zeroforward scattering by magnetic spheres^{13,14} according to Kerker criteria^{8} was questioned^{15,16,17}. Thus to date there has been no unambiguous experimental evidence.
The large losses in metallic structures and metamaterials have turned attention to highpermittivity subwavelength lowloss particles with nonoverlapping magnetic or electric dipolar resonances^{18,19,20,21,22,23}. In particular, dielectric subwavelength spheres of moderate permittivity like silicon^{24,25} present strong magnetic and electric dipolar resonances in the visible, as well as in telecom and nearinfrared frequencies, where silicon absorption is negligible, without spectral overlap between quadrupolar and higherorder modes^{25}. Similar effects are expected for other semiconductor materials^{25,26} like germanium (ε ≈16 in the infrared) and rutileTiO_{2} with an effective permittivity as low as ε≈6 in the nearinfrared. The observation of the strong magnetic response predicted in silicon nanoparticles has recently been reported^{27}. Interestingly, the spectral proximity between dipolar electric and magnetic responses allows coherent effects between them. In particular, when the absolute values of electric and magnetic polarizabilities are the same, such nonmagnetic particles present differential scattering crosssections^{26} equivalent to those predicted for hypothetical dipolar magnetodielectric particles^{8}.
Dielectric spheres are fully scalable with identical properties from DC to light. The ratio λ/(na) constitutes a scaling factor that keeps the effects in the angular distribution of scattered intensity derived from the aforementioned interference between the induced electric and magnetic dipoles, (this magnetodielectric behaviour was actually proven for dielectric cylinders, rescaled from those being made of ceramic in the microwave region to those of Si in the nearinfrared^{28}). Here we use the same argument for spheres: the similar value of λ/(na) in the experiments carried out in this paper should be compared with that of a Si sphere in the nearinfrared^{25,26}.
Control over the angular distribution of scattered radiation by using subwavelength dielectric elements will then be an important step in nano and mesoscopic photonic sciences. Their low absorption minimizes thermal heating and absorption losses, as well as those of the CMOS integration of current plasmonic devices^{29}. At the same time, they strongly reduce the vulnerability of radiofrequency communication systems to highpower electromagnetic pulses^{22}. Concerning spheres, for a given refractive index n and working wavelength λ, it will be possible to select the ‘Huygens’ source or reflector mode by choosing the appropriate sphere radius a (ref. 26). An alldielectric YagiUda antenna based on these ideas was recently proposed^{6,30} and experimentally tested in the microwave regime^{31}. The scattering anisotropy also has a key role in the mechanical action of electromagnetic fields on small particles. The radiation pressure, which until now was believed to push objects^{32,33}, has recently been designed to exert a pulling action towards the source, as recently proposed on exciting the induced magnetic dipole or multipoles of the particle^{34,35}, and by appropriately designing the illuminating wavefield angular spectrum^{36}.
Here we study the electromagnetic scattering from a single isotropic homogeneous dielectric subwavelength sphere of radius a made of moderately highrefractive index (n≈3–4) under planewave illumination. This is the simplest, textbooklike, example of particle radiating fields identical to those from crossed electric and magnetic dipoles. It is remarkable that this basic example of ‘anomalous’ scattering, concerning the anisotropy of the polarization of radiated fields, has not yet been experimentally realized. By measuring the angular radiation pattern of microwave scattering from this single subwavelength sphere, we provide experimental evidence of both zerobackward and nearzeroforward scattering, at specific a/λ ratios. Also, polarization of the scattered radiation contains worthy complementary information. Our measurements of the degree of linear polarization of the scattered radiation^{1,2} are in full agreement with the behaviour predicted for magnetodielectric particles^{37,38}. From a fundamental point of view, our results represent the first experimental confirmation of Kerker’s proposal concerning unconventional forward–backward scattering asymmetry from a single subwavelength sphere.
Results
Scattering by a subwavelength dielectric sphere
The field scattered by a homogeneous dielectric sphere illuminated by a plane wave can be decomposed into a multipole series (the socalled Mie expansion), characterized by the electric and magnetic Mie coefficients {a_{n}} and {b_{n}}, respectively; (a_{1} and b_{1} being proportional to the electric and magnetic dipoles, a_{2} and b_{2} to the quadrupoles, and so on)^{1}. For verylong wavelengths (a/λ<<1) the scattered field is dominated by a small electric dipolar response (a_{1}); however, as the wavelength decreases the first spectral resonance always corresponds to a magnetic dipolar term (b_{1}). The scattering phenomena predicted in the nearinfrared for semiconductors nanospheres^{26}, and in particular the electroinductive and magnetoinductive eigenmodes, have their origin in the spectral overlap between the first (magnetic) and second (electric) ‘Mie’ resonances. These are reminiscences of electric and magnetic whispering gallery modes. On resorting to the theory on magnetodielectric spheres reported in our previous work^{25,26,39}, and that on Si and ceramic cylinders^{28}, and recalling the scaling ratio λ/(na) that maintains the existence of these phenomena in different frequency ranges, we also predict similar observations in conventional semiconductor spheres in the nearinfrared. The rescaling property of our scattering problem, together with the intrinsic interest that our results have in technological applications in the microwave range (electrically small antennas) aimed us to perform our simulations and experiments in the microwave regime (v~3–9 GHz→λ~33–100 mm)^{15}. A millimetre spherical dielectric particle of radius a=9 mm with moderately high electric permittivity ε≈16 should be expected to have magnetodielectric scattering effects and thus angularscattered intensity distributions similar to those recently predicted in the nearinfrared^{26} for semiconductor nanospheres. The predicted results for either Si or Ge nanospheres of 240 nm radius in the nearinfrared (ε≈16 for λ~1.2–2.4 μm) can be rescaled to our millimetre size spheres with 9 mm in the gigahertz regime (ε≈16 for λ~33–100 mm) with the same radius to wavelength ratio (a/λ~0.1–0.2). The experimental setup and experimental details are shown in Fig. 1, Methods, and Supplementary Methods.
Figure 2 summarizes our experimental results in a colour map of the magnitude (in dB) of the scattered field of the target as a function of the incident frequency (in GHz) and the scattering angle (in degrees) when the incident beam is linearly polarized parallel (p) or perpendicular (s) to the scattering plane, respectively. The simulated results computed according to Mie theory for the considered spherical target are also shown, with an amazing overall agreement with the experiments. In order to get some insight into these results, in Fig. 3a, we show the spectral evolution of the normalized extinction crosssection (black solid line) calculated according to Mie theory for the considered spherical target (ε≈16.5+0i)^{1}. In order to facilitate the identification of the different multipolar contributions, the first four multipolar terms of the normalized scattering crosssection Q_{ext}=σ_{ext}/a^{2}, corresponding to dipolar and quadrupolar contributions, both electric and magnetic, are also plotted^{1}. These are directly associated with Mie coefficients a_{1}, a_{2}, b_{1} and b_{2}. From the spectral profile of Q_{ext} and their dipolar contributions, both an electroinductive and a magnetoinductive resonance at λ=57 and λ=76 mm can be identified, respectively (quadrupolar terms a_{2}, b_{2} present resonant modes for incident wavelengths around 42 and 52 mm, respectively). In the dipolar region (grey area in Fig. 3a), where the scattering is perfectly described by a_{1} and b_{1}, it is easy to show that the theoretical differential scattering crosssection in the scattering plane is simply given by (see Methods)
where θ is the scattering angle and α_{e} and α_{m} are the electric and magnetic polarizabilities of the sphere that can be written in terms of the Mie coefficients a_{1} and b_{1} as and (k is the wave number , the induced dipoles in SI units are given by and and we use the convention ). As evidenced in equation 1, the interference between electric and magnetic dipoles leads to a number of interesting effects: the intensity in the backscattering direction (θ=180°) is zero when a_{1}=b_{1} (first Kerker condition) with an overall pattern similar to that of a Huygens source. The zero backwards condition takes place at λ=84 mm (a/λ~0.11) as shown in Fig. 3a. Although the intensity cannot be exactly zero in the forward direction, the forward scattering (θ=0°) presents a minimum when Im(a_{1}) ~−Im(b_{1}) and a_{1}^{2}=b_{1}^{2} (refs 8, 39). For ε≈16.5+0i this second Kerker condition takes place at λ=69 mm (a/λ~0.13). (Black dashed lines in Fig. 2 point to the incident wavelengths corresponding to Kerker conditions in the dipolar regime). It should be remarked that these conditions are the consequence of the coupling between the electric and the magneticinduced dipoles in the dielectric sphere (cf. equation 1).
For incident wavelengths smaller than 52 mm, there are additional interference effects due to the interaction between dipolar and quadrupolar responses. As a classical analogue of Fano resonances^{24,27,40,41,42,43}, constructive and destructive interference effects between sharp quadrupolar (or higherorder multipolar) resonances with broader dipolar modes lead to asymmetric Fano resonance profiles exhibiting sharp minima of the scattered intensities in the forward or backward directions^{40,41,42}. As a complement to the main objective of our research, Supplementary Fig. S1 shows calculations exhibiting Kerker minima of both backward and forward scattered intensities, as well as those associated to some Fano resonances (see Methods).
Linear polarization degree at 90°
The highly asymmetric scattering is also reflected on the polarization of the scattered electromagnetic wave. A useful polarimetric parameter to see this is the degree of linear polarization, measured at a rightangle scattering configuration, P_{L}(90°), defined in terms of the scattered intensities at 90° with respect to the incident wave direction for polarizations perpendicular (s) and parallel (p) to the plane of incidence, respectively. It is quite straightforward to show that the spectral evolution of this parameter involves a simple and accurate way to identify either electric or magnetic dipolar behaviours, as well as deviations from a purely dipolar response^{37,38}. The predicted spectral evolution of P_{L}(90°) computed from the full Mie series, is plotted in Fig. 3b (thick black line). In the dipolar region (grey area in Fig. 3b) (see Methods),
This parameter takes positive values for wavelengths for which an electric dipolar conduct is dominant, that is, when terms associated with a_{1} dominate, while it is negative when the scattering behaviour is mainly governed by the dipolar magnetic term, associated with b_{1} (ref. 38). In addition, the spectral evolution of P_{L}(90°) reaches a maximum or a minimum when the electric or the magnetic dipolar resonances are excited, respectively. Figure 3b shows the experimental data for spectral evolution of P_{L}(90°) (red filled dots). This result is the average of those obtained for the three considered experimental configurations (two for the horizontal configuration (HC):+90° and −90° and one for the vertical configuration (VC), see Fig. 1). The agreement is excellent with that predicted by the numerical simulations from Mie theory. The experimental spectral evolution of P_{L}(90°) shows the positive maximum at short wavelengths (λ~57 mm), corresponding to a dominating dipolar electric behaviour, and a pronounced negative region, corresponding to a dominant dipolar magnetic mode (λ~76 mm). These results constitute the first demonstration with experimental data of the coexistence of electroinductive and magnetoinductive resonances for moderate highrefractive index dielectric particles. At shorter wavelengths the spectral evolution of P_{L}(90°) becomes more complex due to the abovementioned interference between dipolar and quadrupolar terms but still in good agreement with the full Mie theory. From a practical point of view, equation 2 is an interesting result as at the Kerker conditions, with a_{1}=b_{1}, P_{L}(90°) is zero. In the dipolar regime, Kerker conditions can then be readily identified as zeros in the spectral evolution of P_{L}(90°). In Fig. 3a and in the dipolar regime, the spectral evolution of P_{L}(90°) takes the value zero at two incident wavelengths, around 69.3 and 83.2 mm (vertical mark lines in Fig. 3).
Far and nearfield scattering
In Fig. 4a and b, we plot the farfield scattering patterns measured in the experiment (blue circles for the HC and red stars for the VC) for the considered dielectric sphere at these particular wavelengths, 84 and 69 mm, respectively, and for p incident polarization. Equivalent results are obtained for s incident polarization as predicted in ref. 8. For illustrative purposes, we also plot in Fig. 4c and d, colour plots of the numerically calculated total nearfield, in order to show how the scattered wave evolves from the near to the farfield approximations and how they are correlated. Also, and for comparison purposes, simulated farfield scattering angular patterns for a spherical particle (a=9 mm) and constitutive parameters: ε=16.5+0i, μ=1, (ref. 1), are also shown in this figure (black line). The agreement between experiment and theory is excellent. For λ=84 mm (Fig. 4a) the zerobackward scattering condition holds. This can be clearly observed in the angular distribution of the farfield scattered intensity where radiation in the backward hemisphere is strongly reduced, and it is almost suppressed in the backward direction. The electromagnetic scattering is almost inhibited throughout the whole backward hemisphere (180°<θ<360°). In fact, 93% of the scattered energy in the plane is radiated into the forward hemisphere and only 7% remains in the backward one. Experimental results confirm this scattering behaviour at this wavelength. In this sense, and although an angle range of ~60° in HC and 15° in VC around the backward direction cannot be measured due to experimental constraints, it can be clearly concluded that the electric field is very weak in the surroundings of the backward direction and most of the scattered radiation energy is strongly concentrated in the forward hemisphere.
At λ=69 mm, P_{L}(90°)=0, and the zeroforward scattering condition holds (Fig. 4b). In contrast with the previous case, an exact zeroforward scattering cannot be obtained due to energy conservation constraints ^{15,39,44}. However, most of the scattered energy is located in the backward hemisphere with a 73% versus a 27% in the forward hemisphere. This spatial distribution of the scattered radiation energy also confirms this particular behaviour with an excellent agreement between experiment and numerical predictions (black line). These experimental results clearly confirm the analysis made by Kerker et al.^{8}
Discussion
We have confirmed unambiguously by experiments in the microwave range (v~3–9 GHz →λ~33–100 mm) that subwavelength spherical particles of moderatly highrefractive index (≈3–4) are able to scatter light according to the theoretical predictions made by Kerker et al.^{8} over thirty years ago. The spectral behaviour of a useful polarimetric parameter, the degree of linear polarization measured at a rightangle scattering configuration, P_{L}(90°), has helped to corroborate those predictions. It is quite straightforward to show that this parameter involves a simple and accurate way to identify clearly either electric or magnetic dipolar behaviours, as well as deviations from a purely dipolar response. Also, P_{L}(90°) has permitted to locate the spectral position of the Kerker frequencies (P_{L}(90°)=0) where destructive interference between the scattered fields by the induced electric and magnetic dipoles in the particle produces minima in the forward and backward scattering directions. The interesting consequences of the coherent effects between the scattered fields generated by the induced electric and magnetic dipoles in a single dielectric particle, like zerobackward and almost zeroforward scattering should be the basis of sophisticated antenna arrangements in the microwave range to achieve directionality and other interesting scattering effects ‘à la carte’. The rescaling property of the analysed scattering problem makes these results immediately extendable to other spatial ranges (micronano) and consequently to other spectral ranges (nearinfrared to visible). This can open up new technological challenges, for instance in the optical region.
Methods
Theoretical methods
The angular distribution of the scattered electromagnetic wave by a spherical particle of radius a, is usually described by means of its scattered irradiance (normalized to the incident irradiance). Their components parallel (p) and perpendicular (s) to the scattering plane in a given direction θ with respect to the incident beam direction can be expressed, respectively, as follows ^{1}
a_{n} and b_{n} being the Mie coefficients associated, respectively, to the electric and magnetic npolar contribution and τ_{n} and π_{n} being ‘θdependent functions’ ^{1}.
The scattered electromagnetic radiation contains information about the scatterer not only in how its energy is redistributed in space but also in how is its polarization. In our case, we have chosen to study the spectral behaviour of the linear polarization degree measured at the rightangle scattering configuration, P_{L}(90°), defined as
For subwavelength scatterers, the value of the scattered electromagnetic field can be well approximated by using only the first terms of the multipolar expansion. For very small particles (a/λ<<1), both the electric and the magnetic scattered fields can be properly described by using the first four Mie terms. These correspond to the dipolar and quadrupolar contributions, both electric and magnetic, which are associated to the Mie coefficients a_{1}, a_{2}, b_{1} and b_{2}, respectively. Under this approximation, the polarized components of the scattered irradiance are
if the incident light is polarized parallel (s) to the scattering plane, and
if the incident light is polarized perpendicular (p) to the scattering plane.
From the two polarized components of the scattered intensity, (equations 6, 7), the linear polarization degree at the rightangle scattering configuration, P_{L}(90°), can be expressed as
However, when dipolar contributions electric and/or magnetic dominate, only the Mie coefficients of first order, a_{1} and b_{1}, are not negligible and equation 8 can be approximated by
It can be observed that when an electric dipolar behaviour dominates (a_{1} tends to dominate), P_{L}(90°) acquires positive values, while if P_{L}(90°) is negative, the dominant behaviour is magnetic (b_{1} gets larger values than a_{1})^{38}. When a_{1}=b_{1}, P_{L}(90°)=0 and Kerker conditions hold ^{8}.
Two interesting scattering directions are the forward (θ=0°) and the backward (θ=180°) ones. For these, the scattered irradiance for the considered target, under a dipolequadrupole expansion approximation, can be written as
Equations 10, valid for both s and p polarizations, show that coherent effects occur between both electric and magnetic dipoles, as well as between dipolar and quadrupolar modes, producing interesting phenomena in the spectral behaviour of the scattered intensity in these directions. In particular, when quadrupolar and higherorder multipoles are negligible, the electric and the magnetic dipolar contributions interfere, either constructively or destructively, producing minima in either the backward or the forward scattered intensity at certain incident frequencies ^{26}. These Kerker frequencies are marked by arrows in Supplementary Fig. S1 for a dielectric sphere with a=9 mm and ε=16.5+0i. Forward scattering (upper part of Supplementary Fig. S1a) reaches two minima around 4.3 and 6.3 GHz, respectively (second Kerker condition), when the real parts of a_{1} and b_{1} match and their imaginary parts are equal but with different sign (Supplementary Fig. S1b). In a similar way, a drop appears in backward scattering (bottom part of Supplementary Fig. S1a) at 3.6 GHz corresponding to the matching of the real and imaginary parts of Mie coefficients a_{1} and b_{1} (first Kerker condition) (Supplementary Fig. S1b). It is important to point out that while the optical theorem imposes a theoretical minimum value for the forward scattered intensity, the minimum of backscattering is limited by the negligible contribution of quadrupolar modes at low frequencies and the experimental resolution. Another Kerker minimum of the backscattered intensity, mainly contributed by the interference of a_{1} and b_{1} with a minor contribution from Re(a_{2}) and Re(b_{2}), can be observed at 8 GHz (bottom part of Supplementary Fig. S1a).
For frequencies higher than 5.5 GHz (incident wavelengths shorter than 54 mm), there are additional interference effects due to the interaction between dipolar and quadrupolar responses. Constructive and destructive interference effects between sharp quadrupolar (or higherorder multipolar) resonances with broader dipolar modes lead to asymmetric Fano resonance profiles exhibiting minima of the scattered intensities in the forward or backward directions ^{40,41,42}. The minima of the intensity in the forward direction at 5.7 GHz (redshifted with respect to the magnetic quadrupolar resonance at 5.8 GHz) and at 6.2 GHz in the backward direction, can be associated to the quadrupolar magnetic Fano resonance arising from the interference of b_{1} and b_{2} with a minor contribution from the electrical terms. Notice that the constructive or destructive interference depends on the signs of the imaginary part of the Mie coefficients ^{40} (Supplementary Fig. S1b). For example, the Fano shape of the electrical quadrupolar resonance (at 7.2 GHz) is similar to the magnetic quadrupole but with the minima blueshifted in the forward direction and redshifted in backscattering (see the sharp backwards minimum at 7 GHz). The spectrum below 7.4 GHz (the frequency of the magnetic octupolar resonance) is perfectly well described by only dipolar and quadrupolar modes (equation 10). The analysis of the spectrum at shorter wavelengths becomes more complex due to partial contributions from several Mie coefficients.
Experimental methods
Our experiments have been performed in an anechoic chamber at the Centre Commun de Ressources Microondes (Institute Fresnel, Marseille, France), originally designed for SER/diffraction ^{45,46} and antenna characterization ^{47}. This facility was successfully used for carrying out microwave analogue to light scattering measurements on various kinds of complex particles ^{48}. The experimental setup in Fig. 1 allows measuring scattered fields (both in magnitude and phase) on a spherical surface of nearly 4 m in diameter, surrounding the scattering target under test. In the present work, the measurements have been much more challenging as the target is a single sphere of 9 mm in radius, that is, a/λ is between 0.1 and 0.25 at our working frequencies. It is made of a material (ECCOSTOCKHIK from Emerson and Cuming. http://www.eccosorb.com/) with a permittivity similar to that of some semiconductor materials (Si, Ge), with almost no dispersion in the frequency range of interest, and very low losses (the dissipation factor is given to be <0.002 in the 1 to 10 GHz range). In order to determine, as accurately as possible, the permittivity of the material at the working frequencies, some extra measurements have been done with a sphere of 12 mm in radius made of the same material. Thus, assuming a null imaginary part, by comparing the measured scattered field of this sphere to Mie calculations, we have estimated the permittivity of the material to be ε ≈16.5+0i (see Supplementary Methods). This value has been selected in all the computations and analysis made in this research. The scattering target is positioned at the centre of the sphere of measurement, on a polystyrene mast almost transparent in the frequency range of study. The antennas are broadband ridged horns (ARA DRG118), emitting linearly polarized microwaves, either with s (perpendicular to the scattering plane) or p (parallel to the scattering plane) polarizations (see Fig. 1), which are conveniently obtained by a rotation of the antennas. All measurements presented here have been made in configurations such that the transmitter, the target and the receiver are kept in either the horizontal or the vertical planes (HC and VC, respectively, in Fig. 1). There are two main advantages to perform the measurements in those two configurations. Indeed, the first advantage is that the environment of the source is not the same in the two cases, thus the parasitic signals are different. This also allows to determine the linear polarization degree at a rightangle configuration (P_{L}(90°)) in three different experimental conditions (two for the HC:+90° and –90°; one for the VC). The second advantage is that one can obtain a more complete measurement of the scattering pattern from the sphere because of the different angular possibilities. In fact, due to the low a/λ ratio, the scattered intensity is really small and very sensitive to any perturbation from parasitic echoes, stray signals, drift problems or even due to the nonlinearity of the receiver. Furthermore, the problems are amplified by the fact that, to extract the field scattered from the measurements, we need to acquire two complex fields: that is, the total field from the scattering measurements, (which contain both the forward nonscattered part of the incident field plus that scattered by the sphere), and the field detected without the presence of the sphere, (namely, the incident field). Then, we a posteriori subtract that incident field from the total one to obtain the scattered field. Owing to the difficulty of those scattering measurements, in order to obtain reliable results, a calibration procedure and two types of postprocessing of the data have been used, the first one compensates for the drift phenomenon, while the second one consists of a time gating filtering to remove as much as possible the stray signals ^{49} (see Supplementary Figs S2 to S7 and Supplementary Methods for specific details).
Additional information
How to cite this article: Geffrin, J.M. et al. Magnetic and electric coherence in forward and backscattered electromagnetic waves by a single dielectric subwavelength sphere. Nat. Commun. 3:1171 doi: 10.1038/ncomms2167 (2012).
References
 1
Bohren C.F., Huffman D.R. Absorption and Scattering of Light by Small Particles John Wiley and Sons (1983).
 2
Mishchenko M.I., Travis L.D., Lacis A.A. Multiple scattering of light by particles Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, (2006).
 3
Prasad P.N. (ed.) Nanophotonics John Wiley and Sons (2004).
 4
Jin P., Ziolkowski R.W. Metamaterialinspired, electrically small huygens sources. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propag. Lett. 9, 501–303 (2010).
 5
Rolly B., Bebey B., Bidault S., Stout B., Bonod N. Promoting magnetic dipolar transition in trivalent lanthanide ions with lossless mie resonance. Phys. Rev. B 85, 245432 (2012).
 6
Liu W., Miroshnichenko A.E., Neshev D.N., Kivshar Y.S. Broadband unidirectional scattering by magnetoelectric core–shell nanoparticles. ACS Nano 6, 5489–5497 (2012).
 7
Novotny L, van Hulst N. Antennas for light. Nat. Photon. 5, 83–90 (2011).
 8
Kerker M., Wang D.S., Giles L. Electromagnetic scattering by magnetic spheres. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 73, 765–767 (1983).
 9
Milligan T.A. Modern Antenna Design IEEE, John Wiley & Sons (2005).
 10
Yaghjian A.D. Increasing the supergain of electrically small antennas using metamaterials. In Proceedings of EuCAP 858–860(Berlin, Germany, (2009).
 11
Alitalo P., Karilainen A.O., Niemi T., Simovski C.R., Tretyakov S.A. Design and realisation of an electrically small Huygens source for circular polarisation. IET Microw. Antennas Propag. 5, 783–789 (2011).
 12
Miroshnichenko A.E., Luk’yanchuk B., Maier S.A., Kivshar Y.S. Optically induced interaction of magnetic moments in hybrid metamaterials. ACS Nano 6, 837–842 (2012).
 13
Mehta R.V., Patel R., Desai R., Upadhyay R.V., Parekh K. Experimental evidence of zero forward scattering by magnetic spheres. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 127402 (2006).
 14
Bhatt H., Mehta R. V. Magnetically induced Mie resonance in a magnetic sphere suspended in a ferrofluid. J Opt. Soc. Am. A 27, 873–877 (2010).
 15
Alù A., Engheta N. How does zero forwardscattering in magnetodielectric nanoparticles comply with the optical theorem? J. Nanophoton. 4, 041590 (2010).
 16
GarcíaCámara B., Moreno F., González F., Saiz J.M. Comment on “Experimental evidence of zero forward scattering by magnetic spheres”. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 179701 (2007).
 17
Ramachandran H., Kumar N. Comment on “Experimental evidence of zero forward scattering by magnetic spheres”. Phys. Rev. Lett 100, 229703 (2008).
 18
O’Brien S., Pendry J.B. Photonic bandgap effects and magnetic activity in dielectric composites. J. Phys.Condens. Matter 14, 4035–4044 (2002).
 19
Vendik O.G., Gashinova M.S. Artificial double negative (dng) media composed by two different dielectric sphere lattices embedded in a dielectric matrix. in 34th European Microwave Conf. 1209–1212Amsterdam (2004).
 20
Ahmadi A., Mosallaei H. Physical configuration and performance modeling of alldielectric metamaterials. Phys. Rev. B 77, 045104 (2008).
 21
Popa B.I., Cummer S.A. Compact dielectric particles as a building block for lowloss magnetic metamaterials. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 207401 (2008).
 22
Hsu R.C.J., Ayazi A., Houshmand B., Jalali B. Alldielectric photonicassisted radio frontend technology. Nat. Photon. 1, 535–538 (2007).
 23
Schmidt M.K., Esteban R, Sáenz J.J.l., SuárezLacalle I, Mackowski S., Aizpurua J. Dielectric antennas  a suitable platform for controlling magnetic dipolar emission. Opt. Express 20, 13636–13650 (2012).
 24
Evlyukhin A., Reinhardt C., Seidel A., Luk’yanchuk B., Chichkov B. Optical response features of Sinanoparticle arrays. Phys. Rev. B 82, 045404 (2010).
 25
GarcíaEtxarri A. et al. Strong magnetic response of submicron silicon particles in the infrared. Opt. Express 19, 4815–4820 (2011).
 26
GómezMedina R et al. Electric and magnetic dipolar response of germanium nanospheres: interference effects, scattering anisotropy, and optical forces. J. Nanophoton. 5, 053512 (2011).
 27
Kuznetsov A.I., Miroshnichenko A.E., Fu Yuan Hsing, Zhang J., Luk’yanchuk B. Magnetic light. Scientific Reports 2, 492 (2012).
 28
Vynck K., Felbacq D, Centeno E., Căbuz A.I., Cassagne D., Guizal B. Alldielectric rodtype metamaterials at optical frequencies. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 133901 (2009).
 29
GarcíaCámara B. Intra/interchip optical communications: high speed and low dimensions. In Communication Architectures for Systems on Chip CRC (2011).
 30
Krasnok A. E., Miroshnichenko A. E., Belov P. A., Kivshar Yu. S. Huygens optical elements and yagiuda nanoantennas based on dielectric nanoparticles. JETP Lett. 94, 593–598 (2011).
 31
Filonov D.S. et al. Experimental verification of the concept of alldielectric nanoantennas. Appl. Phys. Lett. 100, 201113 (2012).
 32
NietoVesperinas M., Sáenz J.J., GómezMedina R., Chantada L. Optical forces on small magnetodielectric particles. Opt. Express 18, 11428–11443 (2010).
 33
Sáenz J.J. Optical forces: laser tractor beams. Nat. Photon. 5, 514–515 (2011).
 34
Chen J., Ng J., Lin Z., Chan C.T. Optical pulling force. Nat. Photon. 5, 531–534 (2011).
 35
Novitsky A., Qiu C.W., Wang H. Single gradientless light beam drags particles as tractor beams. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 203601 (2011).
 36
Sukhov S., Dogariu A. Negative nonconservative forces: optical “tractor beams” for arbitrary objects. Phys. Rev. Lett. 517, 203602 (2011).
 37
Setién B., Albella P., Saiz J.M., González F., Moreno F. Spectral behavior of the linear polarization degree at rightangle scattering configuration for nanoparticles systems. New. J. Phys. 12, 103031 (2010).
 38
Garcíacámara B., González F., Moreno F. Linear polarization degree for detecting magnetic properties of small particles. Opt. Lett. 35, 4084–4086 (2010).
 39
NietoVesperinas M., GomezMedina R., Saenz J.J. Anglesuppressed scattering and optical forces on submicrometer dielectric particles. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 28, 54–60 (2011).
 40
Tribelsky M. I., Flach S., Miroshnichenko A. E., Gorbach A. V., Kivshar Y. S. Light scattering by a finite obstacle and fano resonances. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 043903 (2008).
 41
Miroshnichenko A. E., Flach S., Kivshar Y.S. Fano resonances in nanoscale structures. Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 2257–2298 (2010).
 42
Luk’yanchuk B. et al. The fano resonance in plasmonic nanostructures and metamaterials. Nature Mat. 9, 707–715 (2010).
 43
Joe J.S., Satanin A.M., Kim C.H.S Classical analogy of Fano resonances. Phys. Scr. 74, 259–266 (2006).
 44
GarcíaCámara B., Alcaraz de la Osa R., Saiz J.M., González F., Moreno F. Directionality in scattering by nanoparticles: Kerker’s nullscattering conditions revisited. Opt. Lett. 36, 728–730 (2011).
 45
Geffrin J.M., Eyraud C, Litman A, Sabouroux P Optimization of a bistatic microwave scattering measurement setup : from high to low scattering targets. Radio Sci. 44, RS2007 (2009).
 46
Geffrin J. M., Sabouroux P. Continuing with the Fresnel database: experimental setup and improvements in 3D scattering measurements. Inverse Problems 25, 035012 (2009).
 47
Serhir M., Geffrin J.M., Litman A., Besnier P. Aperture antenna modeling by a finite number of elemental dipoles from spherical field measurements. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 58, 1260–1268 (2010).
 48
Vaillon R., Geffrin JM., Merchiers O., Eyraud C., Sabouroux P., Lacroix B. A new implementation of a microwave analog to light scattering measurement device. J. Quant. Spectr. Rad. Trans. 112, 1753–1760 (2011).
 49
Eyraud C., Geffrin J.M., Litman A., Sabouroux P., Giovannini H. Drift correction for scattering measurements. Appl. Phys. Lett. 89, 244104 (2006).
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge helpful discussions with I. SuárezLacalle and José M^{a} Saiz. R.V., and J.M.G. acknowledge the technical expertise brought and the work done by B. Lacroix (CETHIL) over recent years to improve some parts of the measurement device. This work was supported by the Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación through grants: Consolider NanoLight (CSD200700046), FIS200913430C01 and C02, FIS201021984, as well as by the Comunidad de Madrid (MicroseresCM, S2009/TIC1476). B.G.C. acknowledges his postdoctoral grant from the University of Cantabria, B.G.C. and L.S.F.P. acknowledge the financial support from the JAEProgram of the Spanish Council for Scientific Research (CSIC) cofunded by the European Social Fund (ESF).
Author information
Affiliations
Contributions
R.V, J.M.G., P.A., J.J.S. and F.M. conceived this work. B.G.C., R. G.M., M.N.V., F.G., P.A., J.J.S. and F.M. developed the concept. J.M.G., R.V, P.A., J.J.S. and F.M. conceived the experimental realization in the microwave regime. M.N.V., J.J.S., B.G.C., R.G.M., F.G. and F.M. performed the theoretical background. J.M.G. and C.E. designed the experimental setup and performed the experiments. J.M.G., A.L. and C.E. developed the postprocessing treatments of the experimental data. J.M.G, R.V., C.E., A.L., R.G.M., F.G., M.N.V., J.J.S., F.M. and B.GC analysed the experimental data. B.G.C., R.G.M., L.S.F.P, P.A., C.E. and J.M.G. carried out numerical calculations and figures. B.G.C., F.G., M.NV, J.M.G., J.J.S. and F.M. wrote the paper. All authors contributed to scientific discussion and critical revision of the article. F.M. supervised the study.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Figures S1S7, Supplementary Methods and Supplementary References (PDF 254 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Geffrin, J., GarcíaCámara, B., GómezMedina, R. et al. Magnetic and electric coherence in forward and backscattered electromagnetic waves by a single dielectric subwavelength sphere. Nat Commun 3, 1171 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms2167
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Further reading

AllDielectric Metasurface Refractive Index Sensor with Microfluidics
Journal of Physics: Conference Series (2021)

Generalized hybrid anapole modes in alldielectric ellipsoid particles [Invited]
Optical Materials Express (2021)

Dielectric optical nanoantennas
Nanotechnology (2021)

Colloidal Mie Resonators for All‐Dielectric Metaoptics
Advanced Photonics Research (2021)

Poles, physical bounds, and optimal materials predicted with approximated Mie coefficients
Journal of the Optical Society of America B (2021)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.