Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Robust photoregulation of GABAA receptors by allosteric modulation with a propofol analogue


Photochemical switches represent a powerful method for improving pharmacological therapies and controlling cellular physiology. Here we report the photoregulation of GABAA receptors (GABAARs) by a derivative of propofol (2,6-diisopropylphenol), a GABAAR allosteric modulator, which we have modified to contain photoisomerizable azobenzene. Using α1β2γ2 GABAARs expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes and native GABAARs of isolated retinal ganglion cells, we show that the trans-azobenzene isomer of the new compound (trans-MPC088), generated by visible light (wavelengths ~440 nm), potentiates the γ-aminobutyric acid-elicited response and, at higher concentrations, directly activates the receptors. cis-MPC088, generated from trans-MPC088 by ultraviolet light (~365 nm), produces little, if any, receptor potentiation/activation. In cerebellar slices, MPC088 co-applied with γ-aminobutyric acid affords bidirectional photomodulation of Purkinje cell membrane current and spike-firing rate. The findings demonstrate photocontrol of GABAARs by an allosteric ligand, and open new avenues for fundamental and clinically oriented research on GABAARs, a major class of neurotransmitter receptors in the central nervous system.


Synthetically modifying the neurotransmitter agonist of a postsynaptic receptor to contain a chemical photoswitch has been shown to afford photocontrol of ionotropic receptors for acetylcholine and L-glutamate through regulation of the access of the neurotransmitter moiety to its binding site1,2. A different approach is to engineer photoregulation through a modulator rather than an agonist, by perturbing the receptor structure at a site distinct from the neurotransmitter-binding pocket. The abundance and diversity of known allosteric modulators of receptor proteins suggest the feasibility of this alternative approach. Given that receptor modulators typically act in concert with endogenous signals in a neural network, a photoswitchable modulator could potentially enable relatively subtle conditional control of neuronal excitability.

GABAA receptors (GABAARs) are pentameric ligand-gated ion channels that function as postsynaptic and extrasynaptic receptors for the inhibitory neurotransmitter γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) in the brain and retina3,4,5. The α1β2γ2 GABAAR, which consists of two α1 subunits, two β2 subunits and a single γ2 subunit, is among the most abundant and widely distributed of this receptor type. A number of naturally occurring and synthetic low-molecular weight compounds are known to modulate the α1β2γ2 GABAAR response to GABA3. Among the most extensively studied GABAAR modulators is propofol (Fig. 1a), a non-volatile anaesthetic that allosterically potentiates the GABA response and, at high concentrations, directly activates the receptor6,7,8,9,10,11,12. Behavioural studies indicate that propofol exerts its anaesthetic actions by modulating GABAARs13,14. With the aim of developing photoregulated GABAAR-directed ligands, we have investigated propofol derivatives that contain azobenzene, a widely studied photoisomerizable chemical residue capable of bidirectional switching between trans- and cis-geometrical isomers1,2,15,16,17,18,19,20. Here we describe the development of a compound, termed MPC088 (Fig. 1a), which displays robust light-regulated activity at GABAARs. To our knowledge, the present study is the first to report photocontrol of a neurotransmitter receptor by a cis–trans photoisomerizable compound derived from an allosteric ligand. The findings establish a new modality by which to regulate GABAARs, a receptor type of major importance to central nervous system (CNS) function.

Figure 1: Effect of MPC088 on the 3 μM GABA response of α1β2γ2 GABAAR-expressing oocytes.
figure 1

(a) Chemical structures. (b) Responses of a single oocyte to co-applied 3 μM GABA and varying concentration of trans-dominant MPC088. Horizontal bar indicates the period of superfusion with GABA- and MPC088-supplemented Ringer solution. (c) Aggregate concentration–response data (mean±s.d.) describing responses elicited by co-applied 3 μM GABA and trans-dominant MPC088 or propofol. Response amplitudes obtained from each oocyte normalized to that elicited by 100 μM GABA alone, a near-saturating condition that is essentially insensitive to propofol potentiation. MPC088 and propofol results, each obtained from seven oocytes. (d) Light-dependent alteration of the 3-μM GABA response by co-applied, initially trans-dominant, 1 μM MPC088. Black bars: periods of superfusion with co-applied 3 μM GABA and 1 μM MPC088. Purple and grey bars: period of presentation of ultraviolet (UV) light and high-intensity visible light (High-Vis), respectively. (e) Results obtained in the experiment of d and three others of similar design (mean±s.d.). Membrane current amplitudes, normalized to the peak amplitude of the 3-μM GABA response, determined under seven sequential conditions: (1) in low-intensity visible light (Low-Vis), at the conclusion of superfusion with (3 μM GABA+1 μM MPC088); (2) at the conclusion of UV illumination; (3) in Low-Vis; (4) at the conclusion of high-intensity visible illumination; (5) at the conclusion of a second UV illumination; (6) at the conclusion of a second high-intensity visible illumination; and (7) at the conclusion of resumed superfusion with fresh 3 μM GABA+1 μM trans-dominant MPC088. These amplitude determination conditions are denoted by numbers beneath the waveform in d. Repeated-measures analysis of variance conducted on the aggregate data yielded F(6,18)=41.975, P<0.001. Post-hoc paired-sample Student's t-tests corrected for multiple comparisons indicated significant differences produced by the initial UV, the initial High-Vis, the second UV, and the second High-Vis illuminations (P≤0.009 for amplitude group 2 versus group 1, for 4 versus 3, for 5 versus 4, and for 6 versus 5, respectively); amplitude groups 7 and 1 did not differ significantly (P=0.075).


Light-regulated potentiation of α1β2γ2 GABAAR activity

Chemical synthesis and purification yielded MPC088 preparations consisting of the trans- and cis-isomers in proportions that were trans-dominant (typically, about 95%; Supplementary Methods). Spectrophotometric and NMR data indicated that, as with unmodified azobenzene, ultraviolet (UV) light (wavelengths near 365 nm) isomerizes the trans-isomer of MPC088 to the cis form, which is stable for many hours in darkness, and visible (or blue) light (containing wavelengths near 440 nm) drives the cis- to trans-isomerization (Supplementary Note 1 and Supplementary Figs S1–S2).

In Xenopus oocytes expressing α1β2γ2 GABAARs, 3 μM GABA elicits a response ~4–10% of the saturation level, and was used to test for response enhancement by MPC088. When co-applied with 3 μM GABA, MPC088 in predominantly the trans-isomer form increased the response in a concentration-dependent fashion (Fig. 1b) and exhibited a potency ~25 times that of propofol, as determined by the relationship of the MPC088 versus propofol concentration for which the peak response amplitude was 50% of that elicited by 100 μM GABA alone (Fig. 1c). By analogy with the known effects of propofol, this action of MPC088 could reflect contributions from both potentiation of the GABA response and direct receptor activation (that is, direct agonist activity). We tested for potentiation by MPC088 at a concentration (1 μM) associated with negligible direct activation, and specifically investigated the effect of light that isomerizes the azobenzene moiety (Fig. 1d,e). Co-applied 3 μM GABA and 1 μM trans-dominant MPC088 markedly potentiated the GABA response, and brief UV illumination presented during static bathing of the oocyte decreased the membrane current to a level near that elicited by GABA alone (Supplementary Note 2). This level of current was maintained in the ambient light after cessation of the UV illumination and, conversely, was increased by exposure to high-intensity visible light. The resumption of perfusion with co-applied GABA and trans-dominant MPC088 restored the membrane current to a level near that exhibited on initial presentation of the two compounds. By contrast, MPD021 (Fig. 1a) that lacks the propofol moiety showed no potentiation of the GABA response and failed to inhibit potentiation by MPC088 (Supplementary Note 3).

Light-regulated direct activation of α1β2γ2 GABAARs

In addition to potentiation, trans-dominant MPC088 robustly activated α1β2γ2 GABAARs (Fig. 2). The response elicited by trans-dominant MPC088 was graded with concentration, evident at concentrations as low as 4 μM (Fig. 2a,b), and greater than the response to a matched concentration of cis-dominant MPC088. The maximum current generated by trans-dominant MPC088 was comparable to the peak current elicited by 100 μM GABA, whereas that generated by propofol represented only about 40% of the 100 μM GABA response. The potency of trans-dominant MPC088 exceeded that of propofol by ~25-fold, as determined by the concentrations of MPC088 versus propofol required for a peak current equal to 40% of the 100 μM GABA-alone response (Fig. 2b). The MPC088-elicited response was eliminated by the GABAAR channel blocker picrotoxin (PTX)21, but was not sensitive to gabazine (SR-95531)—a competitive GABA antagonist22,23—and was only partially antagonized by bicuculline8,24 (Fig. 2b inset). These properties, which are shared by the known GABAAR allosteric activators alphaxalone10,22 and pentobarbital24,25, suggested that MPC088 activates the receptors by binding at a site distinct from the GABA-binding site. UV illumination presented during static bathing reduced the MPC088-elicited current, and visible light reversed the effect of UV exposure (Fig. 2c,d). Furthermore, repeated pulses of UV light presented on a background of continuous visible light during MPC088 treatment yielded cyclic changes in response amplitude (Fig. 2e). Together, the data of Figs 1 and 2 do not rule out an action of cis MPC088 in receptor potentiation or direct activation (Supplementary Note 4), but indicate that any such activity is much weaker than that of the trans-isomer.

Figure 2: MPC088 agonist activity in oocytes expressing α1β2γ2 GABAARs.
figure 2

(a) Representative responses to MPC088 obtained in a single experiment. (b) Concentration–response functions (mean±s.d.) for trans- and cis-dominant MPC088 (n=6) and propofol (n=6). In each of the MPC088 experiments, the cis-dominant form was generated by UV light during static bathing. Amplitudes normalized to the 100-μM GABA response. Inset: sensitivity (mean±s.d.) of the MPC088 (15 μM) response to 100 μM PTX (n=4), 100 μM bicuculline (n=4) and 30 μM gabazine (n=4). (c) Photoregulation of the response to 15 μM MPC088. (d) Normalized current amplitudes (mean±s.d.) determined in the experiment of c and in three others of similar design. Amplitudes in each experiment normalized to that elicited by 3 μM GABA. Numbers beneath the waveform in c denote amplitude determination conditions for the experiment shown in c. Repeated-measures analysis of variance conducted on the aggregate data yielded F(6,18)=68.988, P<0.001. Post-hoc paired-sample Student's t-tests corrected for multiple comparisons indicated significant differences produced by the initial UV, the initial high-intensity visible light (High-Vis), the second UV, and the second High-Vis illuminations (P≤0.010 for amplitude group 2 versus group 1, for 4 versus 3, for 5 versus 4, and for 6 versus 5, respectively); amplitude groups 7 and 1 did not differ significantly (P=0.96). (e) Representative waveform obtained with repeated presentation of UV light during continuous High-Vis illumination (static bathing in MPC088-supplemented Ringer).

Activity at GABAARs of differing subunit composition

Propofol is known to modulate GABAARs that contain a β-subunit. To determine whether trans-MPC088 is active at other β-containing GABAAR subtypes, we tested the compound in oocytes expressing α1β3γ2, a GABAAR that, like α1β2γ2, is widely expressed in CNS neurons3,26,27,28, and α4β3δ, a subtype that is typically expressed extrasynaptically and exhibits high sensitivity to GABA3,5,29. Trans-dominant MPC088 showed potentiating activity on both receptor types (Fig. 3a), and this activity was reduced by UV illumination (not shown). With co-applied 3 μM GABA (representing ~EC8), the α1β3γ2 GABAAR response function obtained with trans-dominant MPC088 closely resembled the response function determined for the α1β2γ2 subtype. By contrast, the trans-MPC088 response function obtained for α4β3δ with co-applied 50 nM GABA (~EC8) approached a plateau representing ~42% of the response amplitude obtained with high GABA concentration. The low plateau level of the α4β3δ response to trans-MPC088 did not reflect a general insensitivity to propofol-based compounds, as co-applied 200 μM propofol and 50 nM GABA yielded a response representing 1.2±0.1-fold (n=4) that of the saturating GABA-alone response. In addition, the direct agonist activity of trans-MPC088 at α4β3δ was much lower than those at α1β3γ2 and α1β2γ2 (Fig. 3b). Thus, trans-MPC088, like propofol, modulates multiple types of β-containing GABAARs, albeit with different efficacy. We also tested the activity of trans-dominant MPC088 at receptors containing the β-subunit substitution N265M, a mutation that markedly reduces the action of propofol both in vitro and in vivo13,30. These experiments specifically involved comparison of the normalized responses of α1β3γ2 and α1β3(N265M)γ2 GABAARs to trans-MPC088 (1 μM) and co-applied GABA. Response enhancement by trans-MPC088 was substantial at both receptor types, but that for α1β3(N265M)γ2 (2.9±0.8-fold, n=4) was significantly smaller than that for the wild-type α1β3γ2 (4.4±1.3-fold, n=5; P=0.03, two-sample Student's t-test; Supplementary Fig. S3). Like propofol, trans-MPC088 lacked both potentiating and direct agonist activity on oocytes expressing the GABAAR subtype that consists of a pentameric assembly of ρ1 subunits31.

Figure 3: Effect of MPC088 on α1β3γ2 and α4β3δ GABAAR-expressing oocytes.
figure 3

Data in each group obtained from four oocytes. (a) Aggregate concentration–response data (mean±s.d.) obtained from α1β3γ2 (black) and α4β3δ (red) receptors with co-applied GABA at similar ~EC8 dose (that is, 3 μM for the former and 0.05 μM for the latter receptor type) and varying concentrations of trans-dominant MPC088. Response amplitudes obtained from each oocyte normalized to its saturating GABA response (that is, responses obtained with 1,000 μM GABA for α1β3γ2 and 100 μM GABA for α4β3δ GABAARs). (b) Aggregate concentration–response data (mean±s.d.) obtained from α1β3γ2 (black) and α4β3δ (red) receptors with trans-dominant MPC088 alone. Data similarly normalized to the saturating GABA response obtained from each oocyte. Results for α1β2γ2 GABAARs in a and b (blue) reproduced from those of Figs 1c and 2b, respectively.

Receptor-tethered MPC088 analogue

MPC088 is a freely diffusible compound and can be removed by superfusion of the oocyte with Ringer. We asked whether covalent tethering of a similar compound to a suitably modified receptor produces persistent potentiation and/or activation. MPC100 (Fig. 1a), prepared by coupling a maleimide-terminated 24-mer poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) linker to the free amino group of MPC088, was tested on oocytes expressing a cysteine substitution at position 79 of the single γ-subunit of α1β2γ21β2γ2(A79C)]32,33, abbreviated as γ-79C. The thiol group of the cysteine residue allowed covalent anchoring of MPC100 (refs 15, 17, 19). Oocytes expressing γ-79C GABAARs, following incubation with trans-dominant MPC100 and then superfusion with unsupplemented Ringer to remove untethered compound, exhibited persistent potentiation of the GABA response (Fig. 4a,b), which was sensitive to UV and visible light (Fig. 4c). These effects of illumination resembled those displayed by wild-type α1β2γ2 GABAAR-expressing oocytes in the presence of co-applied GABA and MPC088 (compare Figs 1d and 4c), although the extent of UV-induced depotentiation observed with the tethered MPC100 was less than that determined on similar treatment with (diffusible) MPC088. The smaller excursion of depotentiation likely resulted from the inability of the UV-stimulating light, which was delivered from above the (opaque) oocyte, to efficiently access MPC100 tethered to the lower, approximately hemispherical surface of the cell.

Figure 4: Persistent potentiation and activation by MPC100 in γ-79C-expressing oocytes.
figure 4

(a) GABA responses of a single oocyte before (left) and after (right) MPC100 treatment (100 μM). Right-hand waveforms recorded after ~7-min incubation with MPC100 and subsequent Ringer perfusion. (b) GABA response functions showing aggregate data (mean±s.d.; five oocytes) obtained before MPC100 treatment, and after treatment with 100 μM MPC100 and subsequent washout (~5 min). Amplitudes normalized to that elicited by 100 μM GABA before MPC100 treatment. (c) Light-dependence of persistent potentiation. Black trace: response to UV and visible light in the presence of 0.1 μM GABA, following treatment with 100 μM trans-dominant MPC100. Dotted lines i and ii highlight the difference in baseline current before (ii) versus after (i) UV illumination). Red trace: later phase of the same experiment (responses obtained after a further ~1 min Ringer perfusion). (d) Baseline currents obtained in a single experiment. Trace i: nominal response to PTX (100 μM). Traces ii, iii: PTX responses obtained after treatment with 100 μM MPC100 in the absence (ii) and presence (iii) of UV illumination. (e) Responses to UV and visible light following exposure to trans-dominant MPC100 and washout (~5 min) of free MPC100. Data obtained from a single oocyte. A period of Ringer perfusion (~1 min) separated the initial (black trace) and later (red trace) phases of the experiment. (f) Aggregate results (mean±s.d.) from experiment e and three others, each involving amplitude determinations under six sequential experimental conditions. Data normalized to the persisting shift in baseline produced by MPC100 treatment. Periods of treatment in each experiment were similar to those illustrated in e. Numbers beneath the waveforms in e denote amplitude determination conditions for the experiment shown in e. Repeated-measures analysis of variance conducted on the aggregate data yielded F(6,18)=65.290, P<0.001. Post-hoc paired-sample Student's t-tests corrected for multiple comparisons indicated significant differences produced by the initial UV, the initial high-intensity visible light (High-Vis), the second UV, and the second High-Vis illuminations (P≤0.007 for amplitude group 2 versus group 1, for 3 versus 2, for 4 versus 3, and for 6 versus 5, respectively).

Treatment of γ-79C-expressing oocytes with trans-dominant MPC100 led to a greater (that is, more negative) baseline current, and UV illumination produced an opposite change (Fig. 4c; note the relationship of the dotted reference lines i and ii). To test whether the baseline change reflected continuing, direct activation by the tethered MPC100 in the absence of GABA, we investigated the effect of PTX presented before and after MPC100 treatment. PTX application to MPC100-treated and then washed cells reversibly reduced the baseline current by 85±7% (n=5; Fig. 4d, traces i–ii). UV (that is, cis-generating) illumination delivered during PTX treatment did not further reduce the baseline amplitude, but inhibited baseline recovery following PTX removal, consistent with a UV-induced reduction in the amount of trans-MPC100 present (Fig. 4d, trace iii). Furthermore, UV and visible light delivered to MPC100-treated γ-79C-expressing oocytes produced, respectively, decreases and increases in membrane current, qualitatively similar to those exhibited by wild-type α1β2γ2 GABAARs in the presence of trans-MPC088 alone (Fig. 4e,f). Thus, the larger baseline current persisting after MPC100 treatment (Fig. 4c) reflected sustained, direct activation of the receptor by tethered trans-MPC100.

These persistent effects of MPC100 required the γ-79C modification. Although MPC100 exhibited potentiation on wild-type α1β2γ2 GABAARs (albeit to an extent less than that exhibited by MPC088), this effect was eliminated by Ringer perfusion (Supplementary Note 5 and Supplementary Fig. S4). In addition, on γ-79C-expressing oocytes, pre-treatment with the thiol-reactive compound methyl-(PEG)11-maleimide blocked the activity of subsequently applied MPC100 (Supplementary Note 6). These findings indicate a dependence of MPC100's persistent activity on tethering, specifically at the engineered cysteine site of the γ-79C receptor.

Activity at GABAARs of retinal ganglion cells

To test whether native neuronal GABAARs respond to MPC088, we examined retinal ganglion cells (RGCs), a cell type known to abundantly express GABAARs34,35,36,37. When presented to single dissociated RGCs of rat retina, 10 μM trans-dominant MPC088 produced, on average, an approximately fivefold potentiation of the response elicited by 2 μM GABA, whereas cis-dominant MPC088 exhibited much less potentiation activity (Fig. 5a). At 30 μM, trans-dominant MPC088 alone produced a membrane current response whose peak amplitude amounted, on average, to 5% of the cell's response to 200 μM GABA (Fig. 5b, inset). However, at 60 μM, the agonist effect increased to 43±9% of the response to 200 μM GABA (n=7), and pre-treatment of trans-dominant MPC088 with UV light reduced this agonist activity by 88±6% (n=4; P=0.002, two-sample Student's t-test; Fig. 5b). Co-application of 100 μM PTX virtually eliminated the ganglion cell response to 2 μM GABA+10 μM trans-dominant MPC088, and to 60 μM trans-dominant MPC088 alone (Supplementary Note 7 and Supplementary Fig. S5), consistent with the mediation of trans-MPC088's potentiation and direct activation by GABAARs.

Figure 5: Action of MPC088 on retinal ganglion cells.
figure 5

(a) Potentiation data obtained with trans- and cis-dominant MPC088; the cis-dominant preparation was obtained by pre-treating trans-dominant MPC088 with UV light for 5 min. Representative responses obtained from a single cell treated with 200 μM GABA (black), 2 μM GABA (red), 2 μM GABA co-applied with 10 μM of trans-dominant (blue) or cis-dominant (magenta) MPC088. Inset: aggregate data (mean±s.d.) for potentiation factor determined with trans- and cis-dominant MPC088 (left and right bars, respectively; n=6, P=0.003). (b) Direct activation data obtained with trans- and cis-dominant MPC088. Representative responses obtained from a cell treated with 200 μM GABA (black), 60 μM of trans-dominant (blue) and 60 μM of cis-dominant (magenta) MPC088. Inset: aggregate data (mean±s.d.) for direct activation by MPC088. Left, middle and right bars show results obtained with 30 μM trans-dominant (n=3), 60 μM trans-dominant (n=7) and 60μM cis-dominant MPC088 (n=4), respectively.

Photoregulation of GABAARs of cerebellar Purkinje neurons

To evaluate the efficacy of MPC088 in GABAAR-expressing cells in situ, we conducted whole-cell voltage-clamp experiments on Purkinje neurons (PNs) in parasagittal slices from mouse cerebellum38,39 (Fig. 6 and Supplementary Methods). PNs are known to express GABAARs of the α1β2/3γ2 forms26,27,28. Figure 6a shows the experimental setup, indicating how blue and UV light sources were combined in the epifluorescence pathway of an upright microscope. Currents were evoked in the PNs by applying 10 μM GABA from a local pressure pipette that also contained 30 μM trans-dominant MPC088. UV illumination during the elicited response markedly decreased the membrane current; conversely, blue light enhanced the current (Fig. 6b). To determine whether these effects of light required the presence of MPC088, we performed similar experiments on the same cell by replacing the pressure pipette with one that contained only GABA (Fig. 6c) or GABA plus propofol (Fig. 6d). By contrast with the Fig. 6b results, there was little or no light-induced current change under either condition. To quantify these results, we measured the current change in response to transitions from UV to blue light, and from blue to UV light (Fig. 6e). We found that the current changes produced by these transitions were opposite and, on average, equal in magnitude (mean ratio of absolute current magnitude in response to blue→UV/UV→blue was 1.00±0.01, a value that did not differ significantly from unity; P=0.86; one-sample Student's t-test, n=7; Fig. 6f). Together, these results demonstrate that MPC088 directly modulates GABAARs of cerebellar PNs in situ.

Figure 6: Effect of MPC088 photoactivation on GABA-evoked currents in cerebellar PNs.
figure 6

(a) Optical configuration. (b) Representative trace from a whole-cell voltage-clamp recording from a PN. The cell was held at −70 mV, and 10 μM GABA+30 μM MPC088 were applied via pressure pipette for 30 s. The cell was flashed with UV light (1 s, shuttered from a mercury arc lamp), then blue light (1 s, from a 470 nm LED) and then again with UV light (1 s). Insets expand the segments of the trace recorded when the light pulses were delivered. (c) Trace from the same cell as in b, but with exposure to 10 μM GABA alone. (d) Trace from the same cell as in b,c, but with exposure to 10 μM GABA+300 μM propofol. (e) Summary of results described in bd. The left-hand trace shows the method used to obtain the numerical data shown at the right. The magnitude of the UV-to-blue transition was calculated as (B-UV1)/UV1; that of the blue-to-UV transition was calculated as (UV2-B)/UV2. Here, UV1, B and UV2 are, respectively, the magnitude of the current evoked by the first UV flash, the blue flash and the second UV flash, as referenced to the pre-GABA current level. The number above each condition indicates the number of cells from which data were obtained. For the negative control experiments (that is, those involving exposure to vehicle or propofol alone) in which no light-evoked current was detectable, current was measured for identical epochs at the terminations of the light pulses. Error bars represent the s.e.m. For both the blue-to-UV and the UV-to-blue transitions, the Kruskal–Wallis analysis of variance on ranks yielded P<0.005 (H>11, df=2). Post-hoc statistical tests showed that results obtained with MPC088 treatment differed significantly from those obtained under either negative control condition (Mann–Whitney rank-sum test: MPC088 versus vehicle (blue-to-UV and UV-to-blue), P=0.002; MPC088 versus propofol (blue-to-UV and UV-to-blue), P=0.014; P-values adjusted for multiple comparisons). (f) Representative trace from a cell exposed to multiple UV/blue light flashes during application of GABA and MPC088.

We also examined the effects of MPC088 on action potential (AP) firing in PNs of the cerebellar slice. These experiments were similar to those described above, except that the cells were recorded under current-clamp to allow the cell to spike. To each of the PNs described in Fig. 7a,b, we first delivered GABA (10 μM) plus trans-dominant MPC088 (30 μM) by pressure application, and then exposed the cell to sequences of UV–blue–UV light. Exposure to GABA+trans-dominant MPC088 decreased the firing rate by approximately 50%, on average (Fig. 7b). Furthermore, in all of the eight investigated cells, the UV–blue–UV flash sequence led to an increase, decrease and increase, respectively, in firing rate. Overall, the firing rate produced by blue light was 52±14% of that produced by UV light. In three of the eight PNs, blue light decreased the firing rate to <20% of that exhibited during the UV illumination, and one PN exhibited a blue-light-induced complete cessation of spiking that was reversed by subsequent UV light. As a negative control, we exposed cells to the UV–blue–UV light sequence, but in the absence of GABA/MPC088 application. In these cells, there was no significant change in firing rate with any of the light flashes (Fig. 7c). Together, these data indicate a reversible, light-dependent action of MPC088 on PN spike-firing rate.

Figure 7: Effect of MPC088 photoactivation on action potential firing frequency in PNs.
figure 7

(a) Representative data obtained by whole-cell current-clamp recording from a PN, which was injected with 468 pA to elicit a high-frequency train of action potentials. During this current step, 10 μM GABA+30 μM trans-dominant MPC088 were applied via pressure pipette for 10 s. The cell was then exposed for 1-s durations to UV light (UV1), then blue light, and then again with UV (UV2). The entire illustrated voltage versus time trace occurs during application of GABA/MPC088. Below this trace is plotted the instantaneous firing frequency versus time; the dashed line reflects the average firing frequency during the 1-s epoch that preceded the first UV exposure. (b) Summary of results from experiments of the type shown in a. Average spike frequencies were obtained for each cell in each of five 1-s epochs, then normalized to the pre-GABA/MPC088 firing frequency (n=8 cells from 4 animals). Error bars here and in c represent the s.e.m. Repeated-measures analysis of variance on the aggregate data yielded F(3,21)=10.213, P<0.001. Red asterisks above the purple and blue bars indicate significance of the average frequency in that epoch versus the preceding epoch (for example, the asterisk above the UV1 bar refers to significance of the average firing rate in the UV1 epoch versus the GABA/MPC088 pre-UV epoch). Significance was determined from post-hoc paired-sample Student's t-tests corrected for multiple comparisons, which yielded P<0.02. (c) Summary of results from experiments similar to that described in a, but in which the cell was exposed only to the UV/blue/UV flash sequence (that is, no GABA/MPC088 applied). Data normalized to the average firing frequency during the 1-s period preceding the first UV flash (n=7 cells from three animals). Repeated-measures analysis of variance on the aggregate data yielded F(3,18)=3.057, P>0.05. Three post-hoc statistical tests were then performed as described in b; none of these yielded significance at the uncorrected 0.05 level.

To test for direct agonist activity of MPC088 on PNs, we perfused cerebellar slices with recirculating 30 μM MPC088 (the maximal MPC088 concentration we could reliably maintain solubilized in bicarbonate-buffered solution). MPC088 was converted to cis-dominant form by a 2-min exposure to UV light (light-emitting diode (LED), 365 nm, 160 mW, Mouser, Inc., Mansfield, TX, USA; LED driver, 700 mA BuckPuck DC Driver, Quadica Developments, Inc., Brantford, ON, Canada), before its dilution into the recirculating external solution. The same LED was then used to continuously UV-illuminate the recirculating solution for the duration of the experiment. We then obtained whole-cell voltage-clamp recordings from PNs and determined the change in membrane current produced by alternating blue and UV illumination of the slice, as in the Fig. 6 experiments. Of 44 cells examined, only 28 exhibited a current change >18 pA, which is the average amplitude of the blue-to-UV light currents from the vehicle and propofol conditions described in Fig. 6. The average response from this subset of 28 cells was 80±13 pA. We then sought to test whether these currents were due to an agonist action of the drug, as opposed to a modulatory action occurring in concert with low levels of endogenous GABA present in the slice40. To discern modulation, we analysed the effect of added 30 μM gabazine22,23, a condition expected to inhibit the potentiating action of MPC088 (that is, to inhibit response enhancement dependent on endogenous GABA), but not to affect the direct agonist activity of MPC088 (Fig. 2). In all but one of eight cells that exhibited light-evoked responses of >50 pA to the blue-to-UV switch, gabazine (30 μM) reduced the current to below the vehicle level of 18 pA (Fig. 8a,b). The average current remaining after gabazine treatment represented 11±3% of the pre-gabazine current (Fig. 8b). Even for the cell exhibiting the highest response of the 44 cells tested, gabazine completely abolished the response (Fig. 8a). Thus, at concentrations comparable to or lower than 30 μM, trans-MPC088 in cerebellar tissue is modulatory (endogenous GABA-dependent) rather than agonistic.

Figure 8: Lack of agonist activity of MPC088 on PNs.
figure 8

(a) Averages of 10 recordings from a PN exposed to multiple blue/UV light flashes, in the presence of cis-dominant MPC088 (30 μM) in the external solution, before (black) and after (red) the addition of gabazine (30 μM). There was no exogenous GABA present in the tissue. (b) Summary of results from eight experiments (eight PNs) including that described in a. The data indicate the magnitude of an outward current. The temporal sequence of illumination differed among the experiments (for example, only the cell in a received multiple blue/UV exposures), but the data plotted are the amplitudes from the blue to UV transition (in the case of the cell in a, this is the blue/UV transition from the first of the three exposures). Yellow-filled data points indicate results from the experiment in a. Each data point is the average obtained from four to ten consecutive recordings. The light-evoked membrane current was significantly reduced by gabazine (Wilcoxon signed-rank test, P=0.008). Error bars represent the s.e.m.

Specificity of MPC088 for GABAARs on neurons

To further address whether MPC088 has non-specific effects on excitability, we analysed the spikes elicited in the experiment described in Fig. 7. We examined spikes recorded during exposure to GABA/MPC088 ('puff') and under conditions in which MPC088 was absent, but in which the Purkinje cell received the UV–blue–UV light sequence ('no-puff'). The following three AP parameters were measured: peak amplitude, half width and maximum rise slope. Parameters were obtained from spikes occurring in the same 1-s epochs, in which average firing rate was significantly modulated by MPC088 (see Fig. 7b,c). AP waveform parameters were calculated for pre-puff, blue light and UV epochs. Average values in the pre-treatment epochs for puff and no-puff did not significantly differ (spike amplitude (mV): 52±2 and 51±2; half width (ms): 0.61±0.03 and 0.57±0.03; maximum rise slope (mV ms−1): 150±10 and 161±13; P>0.4, unpaired Student's t-test). In addition, for each parameter, we normalized the average values for each cell and for each epoch to the averages in the pre-treatment epochs (pre-puff, pre-light). This analysis of excitability showed, first, that the only measurable effects on AP waveform are MPC088-independent and caused by light exposure, and second, that the effect size of light is extremely small (less than 2%; Supplementary Fig. S6 and Supplementary Note 8).

To test whether MPC088 affects excitatory synaptic transmission, we carried out whole-cell voltage-clamp recordings in CA1 pyramidal neurons of mouse hippocampus. As in the experiments of Fig. 8, these recordings were obtained with perfusion of the slice with cis-dominant MPC088 (30 μM) under recirculation. PTX (100 μM) was also included in the external solution to block GABAARs. We evoked excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs) by stimulating the Schaffer collaterals with a bipolar matrix microelectrode (FHC, Inc., Bowdoin, ME, USA), and recorded at a holding potential of +40 mV to uncover the NMDA receptor (NMDAR) component of the EPSC. We also presented paired electrical stimuli separated by 80 ms to assess possible effects of MPC088 on short-term plasticity. Each cell was given 20 interleaved trials in which the cell was exposed to two 0.1-s UV pulses surrounding a 1-s period of either blue light or no light (Supplementary Fig. S7 and Supplementary Methods). The effectiveness of the 0.1-s UV and the 1-s blue stimuli in photoconverting MPC088 was confirmed in separate experiments using 30 μM MPC088 and 3 μM GABA on the same preparation. To quantify the effects of MPC088 on AMPA receptors (AMPARs) and NMDARs, we measured, for the first EPSC of the pair, the peak current and the current just before the second stimulus, which reflect AMPAR and NMDAR components, respectively, of the EPSC41. Neither AMPAR-mediated nor NMDAR-mediated components of the EPSC were significantly altered by blue light (Supplementary Fig. S7b). In addition, blue light had no significant effect on the decay of the compound current (average τ from single-exponential fitting to the decay of the second EPSC: blue off, 131.2±11.1 ms; blue on, 130.9±11.3 ms; P=0.89, paired Student's t-test). There was also no significant effect of blue light on the paired-pulse ratio (measured as peak (second EPSC)/peak (first EPSC): blue off, 1.72±0.07; blue on, 1.85±0.14; P=0.34, paired Student's t-test). Together, these results indicate that MPC088 does not significantly affect presynaptic function, and that it has negligible actions on AMPAR-mediated and NMDAR-mediated EPSCs.


The results demonstrate that MPC088, a photoisomerizable compound derived from the allosteric ligand propofol, exerts a highly potent and light-sensitive regulation of GABAARs. Lights of differing wavelength can reversibly and in a quasi-stable manner interconvert the relatively active and inactive isomers of MPC088; this distinguishes the compound from a photosensitive ligand in which light activates the ligand by excitation of a fluorescent moiety42 or by irreversibly eliminating a protective (caging) structural component. In addition to conferring pronounced light sensitivity to the receptor, MPC088 in its active (trans) form exhibits a potency considerably exceeding that of propofol itself. Our data indicate that the propofol moiety is required for activity, but it remains to be determined whether the high potency of MPC088 is due in addition to specific receptor-binding interactions with the butyryl, azobenzene and/or ethylenediamine moieties of the compound. Such a possibility is consistent with the finding that the α1β3(N265M)γ2 GABAAR, which contains a substitution that strongly decreases the in vivo action of propofol13, exhibits reduced but still substantial sensitivity to trans-MPC088. Furthermore, although the present results argue against a direct agonist action of trans-MPC088 on ligand-gated ion channels of cerebellar PNs other than GABAARs, the broad possibility remains that trans-MPC088 has physiological effects on non-GABAAR ion channels or other surface proteins of neural tissue. Particularly at higher concentrations, some broader activity of the compound would likely be tolerable, since propofol itself, while most active GABAARs14, is known to have effects on other cellular targets43.

We have also examined the properties of MPC100, a tetherable derivative of MPC088 that, via its terminating maleimide group, covalently binds to the cysteine-substituted γ-79C mutant form of the α1β2γ2 GABAAR. The tethered compound exhibits persistent, light-regulated potentiating and activating effects on GABAARs. Thus, the tetherable MPC100 may have application in approaches that involve neuronal expression of a genetically engineered α1β2γ2 GABAAR to which the photoswitch could be anchored, as in previous studies of potassium channels and L-glutamate receptors15,17,19. Furthermore, in contrast to previous structures designed for photocontrol of transmembrane ion channels1,15,17,19, a relatively long linear chain (PEG24) separates the regulating structure (MPC088 moiety) from the tethering moiety (maleimide). Beyond demonstrating that a long and flexible hydrophilic linker (and resultant high conformational entropy) can preserve substantial physiological activity of the distal MPC088 moiety, properties exhibited by MPC100 suggest the potential workability of other remote locations on the GABAAR itself for modulator attachment, or conjugation of the modulator to an affinity reagent designed for binding to the extracellular domain of the native GABAAR. As a general route to controlling neuronal activity with a modulating ligand, covalent binding of an introduced reactive (for example, maleimide-terminated) ligand to an engineered receptor site offers the advantage, in principle, of defining the precise receptor subtype4 on which the ligand will act. However, this approach presents possible challenges relating to the need for inducing expression of the engineered receptor in the target cell type, and for avoiding problematic binding of the reactive ligand to unintended sites (for example, other cysteine-containing surface proteins) on both the target cells and others.

The wide distribution of α1β2γ2 GABAARs in the CNS tissues and the clinical importance of propofol encourage the investigation of MPC088 as a pharmacological tool in studies of CNS neural circuits. Toward this end, we have demonstrated that the compound reversibly modulates GABA currents in retinal neurons and cerebellar PNs, and that it can be used to reversibly control the spiking output of PNs. Given that PNs are intrinsically active at constant rates38,39, they are useful for examining this modulation because their spike rate gives a continuous readout of excitability.

In providing the ability to control circuit excitability with spatial and temporal precision, switchable modulators of neural activity open new possibilities for exploring the links between neuronal activity and behaviour. For example, MPC088 and related diffusible compounds could allow regional induction of anaesthesia through the use of implanted optical fibres or a head-fixed preparation. This approach could be used to explore which brain regions are most important for anaesthesia and sedation. Clinical contexts in which a photoswitchable GABAAR modulator might be useful include diseases of hyperexcitability, such as epilepsy44,45,46,47. Propofol is known to be an effective therapeutic for intractable epilepsy, although side effects are a concern48,49,50. Photoswitchable propofol analogues, in combination with localized optical stimulation51 and appropriate electrical monitoring, might enable a reduction of side effects in treating epilepsies, by employing spatially precise, optically regulated receptor modulation, specifically during bouts of hyperexcitability. Furthermore, even with a diffusible modulator, focally directed illumination could allow spatially restricted actions of the anti-epileptic drug around seizure foci.

The photosensitivity and potency of MPC088 raise the possibility that compounds of this type might be used therapeutically in visual disorders. GABAARs are known to mediate visual signalling at multiple sites within the retina34,35,37,52,53,54; GABAARs of retinal bipolar and ganglion cells are sensitive to propofol55,56; and, as in oocytes expressing α1β2γ2 GABAARs, responses of RGCs are potentiated and directly activated specifically by the trans-isomer of MPC088 (Fig. 5). In diseases involving degeneration of the retina's rod and cone photoreceptors, MPC088-inspired constructs of optimized wavelength sensitivity and relaxation kinetics57, and containing an affinity reagent-based anchor to provide cell-targeting specificity, may have application as a vision restoration therapy by establishing a photosensitivity of inner retinal neurons that effectively bypasses the dysfunctional rods and cones.


Electrophysiological recordings

Electrophysiological experiments were conducted on the following : (1) Xenopus laevis oocytes expressing GABAARs of defined subunit composition; (2) single, isolated ganglion cells of rat retina; (3) PNs in acute slice preparations of mouse cerebellum; and (4) CA1 neurons in acute slice preparations of mouse hippocampus. Animal care and all procedures involving the use of animals were conducted in accordance with institutional policies of the University of Illinois at Chicago (for Xenopus laevis and rats), and with the approval of the Chancellor's Animal Research Committee (Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee) at the University of California, Los Angeles (for mice).

Xenopus laevis oocytes

Oocytes expressing α1β2γ2 receptors (rat α1, rat β2 and human γ2S), α1β3γ2 and α1β3(N265M)γ2 (rat β3 and β3(N265M)), and α4β3δ (rat α4 and δ) were prepared and studied by two-electrode voltage-clamp recording58 (holding potential: −70 mV; amplifier: GeneClamp500B, Axon Instruments, Foster City, CA, USA). Unless otherwise indicated, oocytes were superfused with Ringer solution (physiological saline) at a rate of ~1 ml min−1. The experiments of Figs 1d,e and 2c–e, and Supplementary Figure S4 involved periods of static bathing, that is, halted superfusion. The γ2(A79C) subunit was prepared by site-directed mutagenesis. Oocyte electrophysiological experiments were carried out in room light. A UV-LED (peak wavelength: 365 nm; Hamamatsu Photonics, Japan) and a microscope illuminator (white light; Schott Fostec, Auburn, NY, USA) provided UV and visible stimulating light. As measured at the position of the oocyte, the intensity of the UV light at 365 nm was 220 μW mm−2. At 440 nm, the nominal strength of the visible (white) light (referred to as high-intensity visible light) was 28 μW mm−2 and that of the ambient room illumination was 0.045 μW mm−2. In all experiments, low-intensity visible light from the microscope illuminator (3 μW mm−2 at 440 nm) was present at all times, except those involving high-intensity visible illumination. Electrophysiological data were obtained using Clampex 8.2 (Axon Instruments) and analysed using Clampfit 10.0 (Axon Instruments) and OriginPro7.5 (OriginLab, Northampton, MA, USA).

RGCs of rat

Experiments were conducted on enzymatically dissociated ganglion cells obtained from adult Sprague-Dawley rats (male and female, 6–16 weeks of age; Charles River Laboratories, Wilmington, MA, USA). Procedures for killing, isolation of the retina and the dissociation of retinal cells were as described previously59, except that the period of retinal cell dissociation was shortened from 40 to 20 min. Isolated ganglion cells were identified on the basis of their morphological appearance and the presence of a large voltage-gated sodium current. Whole-cell patch-clamp techniques similar to those described59 were used to record membrane current responses to test agents. The patch pipette with a resistance of 8–12 MΩ was pulled in two stages using a micro-electrode puller (Model PP830, Narishige Group, Tokyo, Japan). The pipette was filled with an intracellular solution containing 95 mM CsCH3SO3, 20 mM TEA-Cl, 10 mM glutamic acid, 1 mM BAPTA, 10 mM HEPES, 8 mM phosphocreatine di(tris), 1 mM MgATP and 0.2 mM Na2GTP; pH adjusted to 7.2 with CsOH. Cells were clamped at 0 mV (Axopatch 200B amplifier, Axon Instruments), and experimental runs were controlled by pCLAMP system software (Axon Instruments). Electrophysiological data were obtained in response to test compounds dissolved in physiological saline (Ringer solution) that consisted of 135 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 2 mM CaCl2, 2 mM MgCl2, 10 mM glucose and 5 mM HEPES, pH 7.4. Supplementation of aqueous test solutions with MPC088 was carried out by adding an aliquot of a stock solution containing the compound dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide. In all experiments, the amount of carrier dimethyl sulfoxide present in the applied test solution was <1% (v/v). Test solutions were delivered from separate reservoirs by a multi-channel perfusion system. The same UV–LED used in the oocyte experiments was used for UV illumination of MPC088-supplemented test solutions. For preparation of cis-dominant MPC088, the test solution of initially trans-dominant compound underwent a 5-min UV illumination before its placement in the perfusion reservoir. All preparative procedures were performed in the dark, and the reservoirs and perfusion lines were light-protected with aluminium foil. As in the oocyte experiments, data were analysed with Clampfit and plotted with Origin. Unless otherwise stated, numerical data from replicate experiments are presented as mean±s.d., and all statistical analyses of data obtained from oocytes and from RGCs employed a two-sample Student's t-test.

Cerebellar PNs from mice

Experiments on cerebellar PNs employed acute slices obtained from cerebella of 16- to 30-day-old C57/BL6 mice (Charles River Laboratories). After induction of deep anaesthesia with isoflurane, mice were decapitated, and the cerebellum vermis was removed and placed in an ice-cold cutting solution containing (in mM): 85 NaCl, 2.5 KCl, 0.5 CaCl2, 4 MgCl2, 1.25 NaH2PO4, 24 NaHCO3, 25 glucose and 75 sucrose. A Leica VT1000 vibratome was used to cut 250-μm thick, sagittal slices from the cerebellar vermis. Slices were then placed in an external recording solution containing (in mM): 119 NaCl, 2.5 KCl, 2 CaCl2, 1 MgCl2, 1 NaH2PO4, 26.2 NaHCO3 and 25 glucose. The solution was warmed to 35 °C for 15–20 min and then allowed to reach room temperature. Both the cutting solution and the recording solution were continuously bubbled with 95% O2/5% CO2, and the recording solution was perfused at the rate of 2–4 ml min−1.

Whole-cell voltage-clamp recordings were carried out at room temperature from PNs with an Axopatch 200A amplifier (Axon Instruments) and the neurons were held at −70 mV. Recording pipettes had bath resistances of 2–6 MΩ and were pulled using a horizontal micropipette puller (Model P-1000 Flaming/Brown Micropipette Puller, Sutter Instrument Company, Novato, CA, USA). The internal solution for voltage clamp (Figs 6 and 8) contained (in mM): 140 CsCl, 3 NaCl, 10 HEPES, 2 MgCl2, 4 ATP, 0.4 GTP, 1 EGTA, 10 TEA-Cl and 5 QX-314 Br (to block respectively, Kv and Nav channels), and pH was adjusted to 7.4 with CsOH. Cs-based internal solutions prevented a small, UV light-elicited, transient outward current that was seen in the absence of GABA or MPC088. In some recordings, CdCl2 (100 μM) was included in the external solution to block synaptic transmission. Although we found no differences in the magnitudes of the MPC088-dependent currents, this had two benefits; it reduced spontaneous synaptic activity, which would otherwise appear as high frequency noise on the traces, and it confirmed that MPC088 actions were cell-autonomous.

Whole-cell current-clamp recordings from PNs were carried out at room temperature with the same equipment as described above. Recording pipettes had bath resistances of 6–9 MΩ. The internal solution substituted 126–130 mM KMeSO3 for CsCl/(TEA-Cl) and contained 5 mM EGTA. In some cases, internal solutions for current clamp included 5 mM phosphocreatine and KCl substituted for NaCl to yield a final chloride concentration of 14 mM. Where appropriate, distilled water was added to adjust final osmolarity. In some cases, positive current was injected into the PNs to elicit spiking. Local drug application to the PNs was achieved with a glass pipette (2–3 μm tip diameter) filled with the solution containing the indicated compounds dissolved in filtered external recording solution. Pressure pulses (0.5 to 2 psi) were provided by a Picospritzer II (Parker Hannifin Co., Cleveland, OH, USA). Data from cells were excluded from analysis if there was no detectable decrease in firing rate with GABA+MPC088 application. They were also excluded if the average baseline (2-s epoch before drug application) firing rates fell outside the range 5 to 100 Hz, or if the cell stopped firing completely in the midst of the trial and did not recover by the end of the trial.

Pulses of UV light were presented to the tissue by shuttering a 100 W mercury arc lamp. Light from this source was collimated and focused through the objective lens of the recording apparatus. The broad-spectrum light from the arc lamp passed through an excitation filter (366 nm; full-width at half-maximum, 16.6 nm; Semrock, Inc., Rochester, NY, USA) to isolate the UV component, and reflected off a dichroic mirror (409 nm cutoff wavelength, Semrock, Inc.; Fig. 6a). The blue light source was a 470 nm LED (Quadica Developments, Inc.) that was connected to a beamsplitter cube (Siskiyou Designs, Grants Pass, OR, USA) located in the infinity space above the objective. The blue light was reflected by the dichroic mirror (500 nm cutoff wavelength, Chroma Technology Co., Bellows Falls, VT, USA) positioned in the beamsplitter cube such that it passed through the 409-nm dichroic mirror in the UV filter cube to reach the slice. This configuration allowed UV and blue light to be combined in the epifluorescence path and to be independently controlled. To minimize exposure of the slice preparation and MPC088-containing solutions to ambient room light, the experimental apparatus housing the cerebellar slice, microscope, micro-manipulators and perfusion lines was shielded by a dark curtain, and a photographic safe light was used inside the area housing these components. Illumination from the microscope lamp used for visual inspection of the tissue passed through a Wratten 2 29 filter that attenuated wavelengths below 600 nm. All data from experiments on PNs are presented as mean±s.e.m.

Additional information

How to cite this article: Yue, L. et al. Robust photoregulation of GABAA receptors by allosteric modulation with a propofol analogue. Nat. Commun. 3:1095 doi: 10.1038/ncomms2094 (2012).


  1. Lester, H. A., Krouse, M. E., Nass, M. M., Wassermann, N. H. & Erlanger, B. F. A covalently bound photoisomerizable agonist: comparison with reversibly bound agonists at Electrophorus electroplaques. J. Gen. Physiol. 75, 207–232 (1980).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Volgraf, M. et al. Reversibly caged glutamate: a photochromic agonist of ionotropic glutamate receptors. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129, 260–261 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Farrant, M. & Nusser, Z. Variations on an inhibitory theme: phasic and tonic activation of GABAA receptors. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 6, 215–229 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Olsen, R. W. & Sieghart, W. GABAA receptors: subtypes provide diversity of function and pharmacology. Neuropharmacology 56, 141–148 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mortensen, M., Ebert, B., Wafford, K. & Smart, T. G. Distinct activities of GABA agonists at synaptic- and extrasynaptic-type GABAA receptors. J. Physiol. 588, 1251–1268 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hales, T. G. & Lambert, J. J. The actions of propofol on inhibitory amino acid receptors of bovine adrenomedullary chromaffin cells and rodent central neurones. Br. J. Pharmacol. 104, 619–628 (1991).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Orser, B. A., Wang, L.-Y., Pennefather, P. S. & MacDonald, J. F. Propofol modulates activation and desensitization of GABAA receptors in cultured murine hippocampal neurons. J. Neurosci. 14, 7747–7760 (1994).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Adodra, S. & Hales, T. G. Potentiation, activation and blockade of GABAA receptors of clonal murine hypothalamic GT1-7 neurones by propofol. Br. J. Pharmacol. 115, 953–960 (1995).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Krasowski, M. D., Hong, X., Hopfinger, A. J. & Harrison, N. L. 4D-QSAR analysis of a set of propofol analogues: mapping binding sites for an anesthetic phenol on the GABAA receptor. J. Med. Chem. 45, 3210–3221 (2002).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chang, C. S., Olcese, R. & Olsen, R. W. A single M1 residue in the β2 subunit alters channel gating of GABAA receptor in anesthetic modulation and direct activation. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 42821–42828 (2003).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bali, M. & Akabas, M. H. Defining the propofol binding site location on the GABAA receptor. Mol. Pharmacol. 65, 68–76 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zecharia, A. Y. et al. The involvement of hypothalamic sleep pathways in general anesthesia: testing the hypothesis using the GABAA receptor β3N265M knock-in mouse. J. Neurosci. 29, 2177–2187 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jurd, R. et al. General anesthetic actions in vivo strongly attenuated by a point mutation in the GABAA receptor β3 subunit. FASEB J. 17, 250–252 (2003).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Solt, K. & Forman, S. A. Correlating the clinical actions and molecular mechanisms of general anesthetics. Curr. Opin. Anaesthesiol. 20, 300–306 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Banghart, M., Borges, K., Isacoff, E., Trauner, D. & Kramer, R. H. Light-activated ion channels for remote control of neuronal firing. Nat. Neurosci. 7, 1381–1386 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Standaert, R. F. & Park, S. B. Abc amino acids: design, synthesis and properties of new photoelastic amino acids. J. Org. Chem. 71, 7952–7966 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Volgraf, M. et al. Allosteric control of an ionotropic glutamate receptor with an optical switch. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2, 47–52 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Fortin, D. L. et al. Photochemical control of endogenous ion channels and cellular excitability. Nat. Meth. 5, 331–338 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Janovjak, H., Szobota, S., Wyart, C., Trauner, D. & Isacoff, E. Y. A light-gated, potassium-selective glutamate receptor for the optical inhibition of neuronal firing. Nat. Neurosci. 13, 1027–1032 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Beharry, A. A. & Woolley, G. A. Azobenzene photoswitches for biomolecules. Chem. Soc. Rev. 40, 4422–4437 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bali, M. & Akabas, M. H. The location of a closed channel gate in the GABAA receptor channel. J. Gen. Physiol. 129, 145–159 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ueno, S., Bracamontes, J., Zorumski, C., Weiss, D. S. & Steinbach, J. H. Bicuculline and gabazine are allosteric inhibitors of channel opening of the GABAA receptor. J. Neurosci. 17, 625–634 (1997).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Jones, M. V., Sahara, Y., Dzubay, J. A. & Westbrook, G. L. Defining affinity with the GABAA receptor. J. Neurosci. 18, 8590–8604 (1998).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Amin, J. & Weiss, D. S. GABAA receptor needs two homologous domains of the β-subunit for activation by GABA but not by pentobarbital. Nature 366, 565–569 (1993).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Muroi, Y., Theusch, C. M., Czajkowski, C. & Jackson, M. B. Distinct structural changes in the GABAA receptor elicited by pentobarbital and GABA. Biophys. J. 96, 499–509 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wisden, W., Korpi, E. R. & Bahn, S. The cerebellum: a model system for studying GABAA receptor diversity. Neuropharmacol. 35, 1139–1160 (1996).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Fritschy, J.-M., Panzanelli, P., Kralic, J. E., Vogt, K. E. & Sassoè-Pognetto, M. Differential dependence of axo-dendritic and axo-somatic GABAergic synapses on GABAA receptors containing the α1 subunit in Purkinje cells. J. Neurosci. 26, 3245–3255 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wulff, P. et al. From synapse to behavior: rapid modulation of defined neuronal types with engineered GABAA receptors. Nat. Neurosci. 10, 923–929 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Meera, P., Olsen, R. W., Otis, T. S. & Wallner, M. Etomidate, propofol and the neurosteroid THDOC increase the GABA efficacy of recombinant α4β3δ and α4β3 GABAA receptors expressed in HEK cells. Neuropharmacology 56, 155–160 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Siegwart, R., Jurd, R. & Rudolph, U. Molecular determinants for the action of general anesthetics at recombinant α2β3γ2 γ-aminobutyric acidA receptors. J. Neurochem. 80, 140–148 (2002).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Mihic, S. J. & Harris, R. A. Inhibition of ρ1 receptor GABAergic currents by alcohols and volatile anesthetics. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 277, 411–416 (1996).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kucken, A. M. et al. Identification of benzodiazepine binding site residues in the γ2 subunit of the γ-aminobutyric acidA receptor. Mol. Pharmacol. 57, 932–939 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kucken, A. M., Teissére, J. A., Seffinga-Clark, J., Wagner, D. A. & Czajkowski, C. Structural requirements for imidazobenzodiazepine binding to GABAA receptors. Mol. Pharmacol. 63, 289–296 (2003).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Ishida, A. T. & Cohen, B. N. GABA-activated whole-cell currents in isolated retinal ganglion cells. J. Neurophysiol. 60, 381–396 (1988).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Fischer, K. F., Lukasiewicz, P. D. & Wong, R. O. L. Age-dependent and cell class-specific modulation of retinal ganglion cell bursting activity by GABA. J. Neurosci. 18, 3767–3778 (1998).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Wässle, H., Koulen, P., Brandstätter, J. H., Fletcher, E. L. & Becker, C.-M. Glycine and GABA receptors in the mammalian retina. Vision Res. 38, 1411–1430 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Rotolo, T. C. & Dacheux, R. F. Evidence for glycine, GABAA, and GABAB receptors on rabbit OFF-alpha ganglion cells. Vis. Neurosci. 20, 285–296 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Häusser, M. & Clark, B. A. Tonic synaptic inhibition modulates neuronal output pattern and spatiotemporal synaptic integration. Neuron 19, 665–678 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Smith, S. L. & Otis, T. S. Persistent chances in spontaneous firing of Purkinje neurons triggered by the nitric oxide signaling cascade. J. Neurosci. 23, 367–372 (2003).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Santhakumar, V., Hanchar, H. J., Wallner, M., Olsen, R. W. & Otis, T. S. Contributions of the GABAA receptor α6 subunit to phasic and tonic inhibition revealed by a naturally occurring polymorphism in the α6 gene. J. Neurosci. 26, 3357–3364 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Hestrin, S., Nicoll, R. A., Perkel, D. J. & Sah, P. Analysis of excitatory synaptic action in pyramidal cells using whole-cell recording from rat hippocampal slices. J. Physiol. 422, 203–225 (1990).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Eisenman, L. N. et al. Anticonvulsant and anesthetic effects of a fluorescent neurosteroid analog activated by visible light. Nat. Neurosci. 10, 523–530 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Trapani, G., Altomare, C., Sanna, E., Biggio, G. & Liso, G. Propofol in anesthesia. Mechanism of action, structure-activity relationships, and drug delivery. Curr. Med. Chem. 7, 249–271 (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Baulac, S. et al. First genetic evidence of GABAA receptor dysfunction in epilepsy: a mutation in the γ2-subunit gene. Nat. Genet. 28, 46–48 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Palma, E. et al. Abnormal GABAA receptors from the human epileptic hippocampal subiculum microtransplanted to Xenopus oocytes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 2514–2518 (2005).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Goodkin, H. P., Joshi, S., Mtchedlishvili, Z., Brar, J. & Kapur, J. Subunit-specific trafficking of GABAA receptors during status epilepticus. J. Neurosci. 28, 2527–2538 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Macdonald, R. L., Kang, J.-Q. & Gallagher, M. J. Mutations in GABAA receptor subunits associated with genetic epilepsies. J. Physiol. 588, 1861–1869 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Power, K. N., Flaatten, H., Gilhus, N. E. & Engelsen, B. A. Propofol treatment in adult refractory status epilepticus. Mortality risk and outcome. Epilepsy Res. 94, 53–60 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Iyer, V. N., Hoel, R. & Rabinstein, A. A. Propofol infusion syndrome in patients with refractory status epilepticus: an 11-year clinical experience. Crit. Care Med. 37, 3024–3030 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Rossetti, A. O. & Lowenstein, D. H. Management of refractory status epilepticus in adults: still more questions than answers. Lancet Neurol. 10, 922–930 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Yizhar, O., Fenno, L. E., Davidson, T. J., Mogri, M. & Deisseroth, K. Optogenetics in neural systems. Neuron 71, 9–34 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Qian, H. & Dowling, J. E. GABAA and GABAC receptors on hybrid bass retinal bipolar cells. J. Neurophysiol. 74, 1920–1928 (1995).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Lukasiewicz, P. D. & Shields, C. R. Different combinations of GABAA and GABAC receptors confer distinct temporal properties to retinal synaptic responses. J. Neurophysiol. 79, 3157–3167 (1998).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Palmer, M. J. Functional segregation of synaptic GABAA and GABAC receptors in goldfish bipolar cell terminals. J. Physiol. 577, 45–53 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Yue, L. et al. Potentiating action of propofol at GABAA receptors of retinal bipolar cells. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 52, 2497–2509 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Xie, A. et al. Propofol potentiates GABA-elicited responses of bipolar and ganglion cells in rat retina. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci 51, ARVO E-abstract 1865 (2010).

  57. Sadovski, O., Beharry, A. A., Zhang, F. & Woolley, G. A. Spectral tuning of azobenzene photoswitches for biological applications. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 48, 1484–1486 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Adamian, L. et al. Structural model of ρ1 GABAC receptor based on evolutionary analysis: testing of predicted protein-protein interactions involved in receptor assembly and function. Protein Sci. 18, 2371–2383 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Ramsey, D. J., Ripps, H. & Qian, H. Streptozotocin-induced diabetes modulates GABA receptor activity of rat retinal neurons. Exper. Eye Res. 85, 413–422 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank Drs Robert F. Standaert, Hélène A. Gussin and Deborah M. Little for helpful discussions; Dr Martin Wallner for providing cDNA for the α4, β3, β3(N265M) and δ GABAAR subunits; and Dr Matthew Shtrahman, Ms. Vivy Tran, Ms. Tara Nguyen and Dr Joyce Wondolowski for technical assistance. Supported by NIH grants EY016094, EY001792 and AA01973; the Daniel F. and Ada L. Rice Foundation (Skokie, IL); Hope for Vision (Washington, DC); the Beckman Initiative for Macular Research (Los Angeles, CA); the American Health Assistance Foundation (Clarksburg, MD); Research to Prevent Blindness (New York, NY); and by award UL1RR029879 from the University of Illinois at Chicago Center for Clinical and Translational Science (CCTS).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



K.S.B. and M.P. designed the chemical synthesis routes. M. P. performed the chemical syntheses and NMR experiments. The electrophysiological and spectrophotometric experiments were designed by L.Y., S.S.D., A.X., T.S.O., H.Q. and D.R.P., and performed by L.Y., S.S.D., A.X. and F.F. The manuscript was prepared by L.Y., D.R.P., S.S.D., T.S.O. and K.S.B., with all authors providing revisions.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David R. Pepperberg.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Figures, Notes and Methods

Supplementary Figures S1-S7, Supplementary Notes 1-8 and Supplementary Methods (PDF 952 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yue, L., Pawlowski, M., Dellal, S. et al. Robust photoregulation of GABAA receptors by allosteric modulation with a propofol analogue. Nat Commun 3, 1095 (2012).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing