Abstract
Radiative coupling between oscillators is one of the most fundamental subjects of research in optics, where particularly a Bragg-type arrangement is of interest and has already been applied to atoms and excitons in quantum wells. Here we explore this arrangement in a plasmonic structure. We observe the emergence of an octave-wide photonic band gap in the optical regime. Compared with atomic or excitonic systems, the coupling efficiency of the particle plasmons utilized here is several orders of magnitude larger and widely tunable by changing the size and geometry of the plasmonic nanowires. We are thus able to explore the regime where the coupling distance is even limited by the large radiative decay rate of the oscillators. This Bragg-stacked coupling scheme will open a new route for future plasmonic applications such as far-field coupling to quantum emitters without quenching, plasmonic cavity structures and plasmonic distributed gain schemes for spasers.
Introduction
In optics, the coupling of oscillators, especially via their radiative fields, is one of the most fundamental subjects of research. A system consisting of oscillators that are periodically arranged at wavelength-scale distances in the propagation direction of light (Fig. 1a) shows similarities to passive photonic crystal structures1, where the propagating light is manipulated by a periodic refractive index modulation. However, incorporating oscillators into this type of structure leads to fundamentally different phenomena as the oscillators are mutually coupled via their radiation fields and therefore can exhibit collective resonances.
(a) Schematic of four radiatively coupled resonant oscillators. Considering retardation is crucial because of interparticle distances on the order of the wavelength. (b) Schematic of a Bragg-stacked plasmonic structure embedded into a dielectric spacer material with refractive index nSp. Gold nanowires with w=180 nm and h=20 nm are arranged at a lateral periodicity dx=360 nm and vertical distance dz=260 nm. dx is chosen such that lateral near-field coupling as well as higher diffraction orders are negligible.
This type of coupled system has previously been considered in several fields of optics: in semiconductor physics, radiative coupling of excitons in quantum wells2,3,4,5,6,7,8 at Bragg distance leads to superradiant coupling effects and a photonic band gap (PBG). For 100 coupled quantum wells, the formation of a PBG of 5 meV width has been demonstrated6. Likewise, atoms arranged in an optical lattice can give rise to PBGs of several megahertz to gigahertz linewidth9,10,11,12.
Here we transfer this concept to plasmonics, where up to now, mostly laterally coupled, planar structures have been studied13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26, and only little work in three-dimensional, stacked geometries has been performed14,27. A stacked arrangement is advantageous for several reasons. First, the oscillators are excited with a phase retardation and thus the spatial forward–backward symmetry is broken. Eigenmodes which are dark in planar geometry can become bright in a stacked geometry. Second, the dipole emission patterns of the oscillators are aligned along the interparticle axis, which substantially enhances the interaction strength.
We stack plasmonic oscillators with a particle plasmon resonance (PPR) at wavelength λPPR in Bragg fashion. Figure 1b shows a schematic of the structure, which consists of vertically stacked gold nanowires separated by a dielectric spacer layer. The structure is illuminated from above with light polarized perpendicular to the nanowires. We observe an octave-wide PBG at optical frequencies, characterized by a broad region of high reflectance with simultaneously weak absorbance. Furthermore, we identify the limitation of radiative coupling due to the extremely fast decay of the resonant plasmonic oscillators. Unlike in atomic or semiconductor systems, we are able to continuously tune the resonance frequency and oscillator strength of our classical oscillators over a range of nearly one order of magnitude and hence are able to engineer their properties easily.
Results
Calculations of non-resonant and resonant structures
To demonstrate the difference between a non-resonant structure showing only refractive index contrast and a resonant plasmonic structure, Figure 2 shows calculated spectra of an eight-layer metal-dielectric cavity and an eight-layer nanowire stack. Calculations are performed with a scattering matrix algorithm28,29. The optical properties of gold are taken from Johnson and Christy30.
(a) Colour-coded calculated transmittance, reflectance, and absorbance spectra for eight stacked 20-nm-thick continuous Au layers. The spacer thickness dz is varied to the right. Transmittance is scaled by a factor of three for clarity. (b) Colour-coded calculated transmittance, reflectance, and absorbance spectra for an eight-layer plasmonic nanowire stack with λPPR=820 nm. Bragg spacing is indicated by a white arrow at the top of the graph. White solid lines indicate the width of the stop band at Bragg distance. The white dashed line indicates the single layer PPR wavelength λPPR. The images on the right schematically depict the considered structures. (c) Calculated transmittance, reflectance, and absorbance spectra for the Bragg-stacked (dz=260 nm) multilayer structures with increasing layer number N. The single oscillator resonance frequency is indicated by a dashed grey line as a guide to the eye.
The bare metal-dielectric stack (Fig. 2a) shows broad regions of high reflectance due to the continuous metal films. Transmittance is only possible at the Fabry–Pérot (FP) modes, which are hybridized into seven branches as the structure consists of seven coupled cavities. In purely dielectric structures these hybridized modes would constitute the pass bands upon increasing layer number N. However, for metallic structures no pass bands emerge as absorbance increases significantly.
Replacing the passive metallic layers by resonant metallic nanowires leads to substantial changes in the system, as is evident from Figure 2b. First, the off-resonant behaviour changes: the metal film exhibits a high reflectivity over a broad spectral region, consequently showing high reflectance and no transmittance. In contrast, far away from the PPR wavelength, the nanowire structure shows higher transmittance and low reflectance. Second, the incorporation of the PPR oscillators qualitatively changes the response of the system as the interaction of FP and PPR modes leads to the formation of coupled PPR-FP modes27. This opens up new possibilities to tune the response of the system.
A situation of particular interest occurs whenever the vertical spacing matches a multiple of the single oscillator wavelength, that is, with an integer number M. At these points, the Bragg criterion for the PPR wavelength is fulfilled and the oscillator phases are adjusted such that their emitted fields interfere destructively in the forward direction and constructively in the backward direction. Consequently, the system exhibits high reflectance and low transmittance. As the coupled PPR–FP modes which spectrally match the single oscillator wavelength exhibit a nearly vanishing linewidth due to the spatially matched arrangement of the oscillators27, the spectral width of this region of high reflectance, low transmittance, and almost no absorbance (indicated by white solid lines in Fig. 2b) is very broad.
To investigate the influence of increasing oscillator number N in our plasmonic system, Figure 2c shows calculated transmittance, reflectance, and absorbance for one to ten nanowire layers stacked at Bragg distance. An increase of the width of the high-reflectance region can be observed. Beyond this, the spectral shape changes from a Lorentzian-like to a rectangular PBG-like shape. The high reflectance is accompanied by very low absorbance, which is only significant at the borders of the gap. The spectral width of 1 eV is remarkable, as it spans almost one octave. The reason for the emergence of this exceptionally broad PBG is the efficient coupling of the PPRs to the light field and hence their large spectral width compared with excitonic structures. This will be discussed in detail below.
Experiment
We fabricated a sample that consists of four layers stacked at Bragg distance by using an electron-beam lithography multilayer process27,31. A scanning electron micrograph of the sample is shown in Figure 3a. Transmittance as well as reflectance spectra were recorded in a Fourier-transform infrared microscope after the completion of each layer. The evolution of the spectra with increasing layer numbers is shown in Figure 3b experimentally as well as theoretically, using an analytical coupling model7 (see Methods), and furthermore, a rigorous scattering matrix approach. The transformation of the spectral shape from a Lorentzian lineshape in the one-layer case to a rectangular band-gap-type lineshape for a Bragg multilayer stack is pronouncedly observable. The PBG in the four-layer structure, extracted from the reflectance measurement exhibits a spectral width of 815 meV, whereas the single PPR width is only 530 meV. Both of these values are slightly below the calculated values of 1,025 and 640 meV, respectively. In the gap region, the structure exhibits a very high reflectivity of around 80% experimentally, whereas the calculated reflectance is at almost 100%. Deviations between theory and experiment predominantly originate from fabrication imperfections, and the measurement technique using a high-NA Cassegrain objective.
(a) Scanning electron micrograph of a four-layer plasmonic Bragg structure. To reveal the three-dimensional arrangement, the images show a groove cut by a focused ion beam. All scale bars are 500 nm. (b) Left: experimental transmittance (red) and reflectance (blue) spectra for one to four layers. Middle: spectra calculated using an analytical coupling model7. The oscillator parameters extracted from the single-layer experimental data were used as calculation input. Right: scattering matrix calculation. The small peak in reflectance at 1.5 eV is a remainder of the coupled PPR–FP mode whose linewidth almost vanishes at Bragg distance. The images on the right schematically depict the structure.
Strikingly, we observe a broad, saturating PBG for already four layers, whereas in excitonic structures around 100 oscillators are necessary. As will be shown below, both the broad spectral width of the PGB and fast saturation arise from the large dipole moment of the PPR, which results in a radiative coupling strength exceeding that of a typical excitonic resonances by about four orders of magnitude. Additionally, this large coupling makes the emergence of a PBG in our plasmonic structures far more robust against nonradiative contributions to the linewidth.
Analytical modelling
To gain insight into the mechanisms that lead to the formation of broad PBGs, we study the influence of the coupling strength on band gap formation within a single oscillator model. If the lateral spacing between the nanowires within a layer is chosen such that near-field coupling can be neglected, each layer can be treated as a single, planar confined oscillator. Its optical response is then described by the effective susceptibility

with resonance energy EPPR, and radiative and nonradiative linewidth Γ0 and Γ, respectively. The radiative linewidth Γ0 determines the oscillator strength and hence the coupling to the light field. In a multilayer structure, the oscillators couple via their radiation fields, which leads to N distinct modes. For semiconductor multi-quantum-well structures with narrow linewidths, it has been shown that in a Bragg arrangement only one superradiant mode couples to the light field and the collective response of the system resembles a single oscillator with N times enhanced radiative width4,5,6,7,8. The amplitude reflection coefficient is then given by:

However, an unlimited growth of the linewidth N Γ0 as implied by equation (2) is, of course, unphysical. It relies on the exact phase coherence of excitations in different layers. As the total linewidth determines the spectral width of the radiation field that contributes to the coupling of different layers, its spatial extent is limited by dephasing and can become smaller than the sample dimensions. Hence, the number of oscillators that can be efficiently coupled by the radiation field is limited by the dephasing length

where equation (2) has been used in the latter equality. The condition Ndz<ld determines the number of layers that can be coupled in a Bragg geometry, resulting in

For plasmonic oscillators, the radiative linewidth substantially exceeds the nonradiative contribution. The maximum number of coupled oscillator layers that yield approximately a Lorentzian lineshape can be estimated to be with a maximum total linewidth
which is independent of the nonradiative losses. Stacking more layers changes the spectral shape of the reflectivity from a Lorentzian to the typical PGB shape. Its ultimate width can be calculated by considering an infinite structure and using a Kronig-Penney approach32

which is achieved for a layer number of
Oscillator strength tuning and limits of radiative coupling
To further support the evidence for this radiation-limited coupling, we perform a set of scattering matrix calculations with decreased wire dimensions. As the oscillator strength depends on the number of electrons and thus on the volume of the wires, we tune the plasmonic oscillator strength by decreasing the width and height of the wires while the spectral position of the PPR is preserved. The resulting reflectance spectra for four different geometries are shown in Figure 4a. The spectral linewidth extracted from these graphs is shown in Figure 4b. For all geometries, a saturation of the spectral width can be observed. The onset of saturation and the maximum width, however, depends on the wire geometry and hence the oscillator strength. One can calculate the maximum layer number Nmax as well as the maximum gap width ΔEmax (Eq. 5) by extracting the values for Γ0 and Γ from the single-layer spectra. These are indicated for the different geometries by vertical (Nmax) and horizontal (ΔEmax) lines in Figure 4b. The agreement is quite good for the large wires. For the smaller wires, ΔEmax is overestimated, as the nonradiative contribution to the linewidth has not been taken into account in equation (5).
(a) Calculated reflectance spectra for increasing number of layers N of a Bragg stack with different wire geometries. The widths and heights of the wires are 50×4 (red), 80×6.8 (blue), 130×12.8 (orange) and 180×20 nm2 (green). The images above schematically depict the structure. (b) FWHM extracted from the spectra in (a). Horizontal lines indicate the maximum band gap ΔEmax, vertical lines indicate the maximum number of layers that can be coupled Nmax.
Discussion
These results demonstrate a fundamental limit for the radiative coupling of plasmons, as well as excitons, as follows: with increasing coupling strength, the width of the spectral response increases, while simultaneously the number of layers required to achieve the maximum stop band decreases. Only a limited number of oscillators can couple because of their fast decay rate. By using large plasmonic nanowires, which exhibit a very efficient coupling to the radiative field, we can realize a very broad PBG with only a small number of coupled oscillators.
In conclusion, we have demonstrated that radiative coupling of multiple particle plasmonic oscillators at Bragg distance leads to the emergence of a very broad PBG of almost one octave at optical frequencies. The effortless tunability of the oscillators allows for a flexible and easy tailoring of very broad PBGs. Furthermore, this coupling scheme is potentially interesting for an efficient coupling of quantum emitters to the radiation field33. In the future, introducing phase jumps by defects in the Bragg stack could lead to high-Q localized modes34. Possible applications range from novel filters and resonant cavities35,36,37 to plasmonic distributed gain38, low-loss metamaterials39 and spaser concepts40.
Methods
Calculation methods
The calculated spectra of Figure 3b are obtained by a home-made code using the Fourier modal method28 or scattering matrix method. This method is ideally suited for the description of structures that consist of several layers along the light propagation axis and are periodic in the other, lateral directions. The structure is divided into several layers. As the individual layers exhibit lateral periodicity in both directions, Maxwell's equations can be rigorously solved as an infinite-dimensional linear eigenvalue problem. Assuring proper convergence, the calculation is truncated yielding the scattering matrix of a single layer. Subsequently, all scattering matrices of the individual layers are combined by considering the appropriate boundary conditions. The calculation of metallodielectric structures within this method is hampered by the strong permittivity differences at the interfaces between metallic and dielectric components in the structure. To achieve good convergence, a high number of harmonics has to be considered. Alternatively, optimization methods such as adaptive spatial resolution and correct factorization rules allow for substantially decreased calculation times29.
In the calculations, the structure is placed on top of a quartz substrate and each layer is embedded into a spacer layer
. The top layer is also capped by a spacer layer to maintain a homogeneous environment. All dielectrics are assumed dispersion-free. For gold, the experimental values of Johnson and Christy30 are used. For the calculations in Figure 4, a Drude metal with a plasma frequency of 2,100 THz and a damping frequency of 21 THz is assumed for the gold structures.
The analytical calculation of Figure 3b utilizes a single oscillator model. Within this model, the response of a single planar sheet is modelled by its effective two-dimensional susceptibility given by equation (1). For narrow resonances, the radiative linewidth can be approximated as for the frequency range of interest. However, for broad plasmonic resonances it is necessary to include this frequency dependence. In the multilayer structure, the layers are coupled by the propagating reflected and transmitted waves, and the overall response depends on the exact geometry of the structure via the phases accumulated by the propagating light waves. The overall transmission and reflection amplitudes for a system consisting of N oscillators are then obtained as7


with the N-dimensional vector and N×N matrix
containing the phases between the oscillators. The t(E) and r(E) exhibit N complex resonances. For a single layer, the reflection and transmission amplitudes given by the equations (6) and (7) are simplified to
The reflectance |r(E)|2 is used to retrieve the values for Γ0 and Γ from the FWHM and the maximum height of the calculated single-layer spectra in Figure 4.
For narrow resonances at exact Bragg distance, equation (7) gives the simplified result of equation (2).
The coupling between two layers separated by a distance d is proportional to Inserting a complex energy
the dephasing length is defined as the length at which the coupling is decreased by a factor of e.
Fabrication and measurement methods
Experimental realization of the multilayers is achieved using a multilayer electron-beam lithography technique. Each layer is exposed in a PMMA resist layer with subsequent development and evaporation of 2 nm Cr and 20 nm Au in an electron-gun evaporator. After lift-off, the structure is planarized using a spin-on-dielectric layer (Futurrex IC1-200). Its thickness is controlled using different solvent fractions, varying spin speed and multiple coating runs. The spectra are acquired using a commercial Fourier-transform infrared spectrometer (Bruker Vertex 80) with attached microscope (Bruker Hyperion). Light is polarized perpendicular to the wires. A ×15 Cassegrain objective with NA 0.4 is used to illuminate the sample, as well as to collect the transmitted and reflected light. Measurements for different spectral ranges are performed with a Si (1.3–2.2 eV) and an InGaAs photodiode (0.7–1.3 eV). Subsequently, the spectra are combined. Transmittance is measured with respect to the bare substrate. For the reflectance reference measurement, a 200-nm-thick Au mirror is used.
Additional information
How to cite this article: Taubert, R. et al. Octave-wide photonic band gap in three-dimensional plasmonic Bragg structures and limitations of radiative coupling. Nat. Commun. 3:691 doi: 10.1038/ncomms1694 (2012).
References
Yablonovitch, E. Inhibited spontaneous emission in solid-state physics and electronics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 2059–2062 (1987).
Gibbs, H. M., Khitrova, G. & Koch, S. W. Exciton-polariton light-semiconductor coupling effects. Nat. Photonics 5, 275–282 (2011).
Goldberg, D. et al. Exciton-lattice polaritons in multiple-quantum-well-based photonic crystals. Nat. Photonics 3, 662–666 (2009).
Prineas, J. P. et al. Exciton-polariton eigenmodes in light-coupled In0.04Ga0.96As/GaAs semiconductor multiple-quantum-well periodic structures. Phys. Rev. B 61, 13863–13872 (2000).
Hübner, M. et al. Collective effects of excitons in multiple-quantum-well Bragg and anti-Bragg structures. Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 4199–4202 (1996).
Hübner, M. et al. Optical lattices achieved by excitons in periodic quantum well structures. Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 2841–2844 (1999).
Stroucken, T., Knorr, A., Thomas, P. & Koch, S. W. Coherent dynamics of radiatively coupled quantum-well excitons. Phys. Rev. B 53, 2026–2033 (1996).
Ivchenko, E. L., Nesvizhskii, A. I. & Jorda, S. Resonant Bragg reflection from quantum-well structures. Superlatt. Microstruct. 16, 17–20 (1994).
Schilke, A., Zimmermann, C., Courteille, P. W. & Guerin, W. Photonic band gaps in one-dimensionally ordered cold atomic vapors. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 223903 (2011).
Weidemüller, M., Hemmerich, A., Görlitz, A., Esslinger, T. & Hänsch, T. W. Bragg diffraction in an atomic lattice bound by light. Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 4583–4586 (1995).
Birkl, G., Gatzke, M., Deutsch, I. H., Rolston, S. L. & Phillips, W. D. Bragg scattering from atoms in optical lattices. Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 2823–2826 (1995).
Deutsch, I. H., Spreeuw, R. J. C., Rolston, S. L. & Phillips, W. D. Photonic band gaps in optical lattices. Phys. Rev. A 52, 1394–1410 (1995).
Zhou, W. & Odom, T. W. Tunable subradiant lattice plasmons by out-of-plane dipolar interactions. Nat. Nanotech. 6, 423–427 (2011).
Husaini, S., Deych, L. & Menon, V. M. Plasmon-resonance-induced enhancement of the reflection band in a one-dimensional metal nanocomposite photonic crystal. Opt. Lett. 36, 1368–1370 (2011).
Decker, M., Feth, N., Soukoulis, C. M., Linden, S. & Wegener, M. Retarded long-range interaction in split-ring-resonator square arrays. Phys. Rev. B 84, 085416 (2011).
Adato, R., Yanik, A. A., Wu, C.- H., Shvets, G. & Altug, H. Radiative engineering of plasmon lifetimes in embedded nanoantenna arrays. Opt. Express 18, 4526–4537 (2010).
Giannini, V., Vecchi, G. & Gómez Rivas, J. Lighting up multipolar surface plasmon polaritons by collective resonances in arrays of nanoantennas. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 266801 (2010).
Fischer, H. & Martin, O. J. F. Retardation-induced plasmonic blinking in coupled nanoparticles. Opt. Lett. 34, 368–370 (2009).
Auguié, B. & Barnes, W. L. Collective resonances in gold nanoparticle arrays. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 143902 (2008).
Kravets, V. G., Schedin, F. & Grigorenko, A. N. Extremely narrow plasmon resonances based on diffraction coupling of localized plasmons in arrays of metallic nanoparticles. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 087403 (2008).
Hicks, E. M. et al. Controlling plasmon line shapes through diffractive coupling in linear arrays of cylindrical nanoparticles fabricated by electron beam lithography. Nano Lett. 5, 1065–1070 (2005).
Christ, A. et al. Optical properties of planar metallic photonic crystal structures: experiment and theory. Phys. Rev. B 70, 125113 (2004).
Zou, S., Janel, N. & Schatz, G. C. Silver nanoparticle array structures that produce remarkably narrow plasmon lineshapes. J. Chem. Phys. 120, 10871–10875 (2004).
Zhao, L. L., Kelly, K. L. & Schatz, G. C. The extinction spectra of silver nanoparticle arrays: influence of array structure on plasmon resonance wavelength and width. J. Phys. Chem. B 107, 7343–7350 (2003).
Haynes, C. L. et al. Nanoparticle optics: the importance of radiative dipole coupling in two-dimensional nanoparticle arrays. J. Phys. Chem. B 107, 7337–7342 (2003).
Lamprecht, B. et al. Metal nanoparticle gratings: influence of dipolar particle interaction on the plasmon resonance. Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 4721–4724 (2000).
Taubert, R., Ameling, R., Weiss, T., Christ, A. & Giessen, H. From near-field to far-field coupling in the third dimension: retarded interaction of particle plasmons. Nano Lett. 11, 4421–4424 (2011).
Tikhodeev, S. G., Yablonskii, A. L., Muljarov, E. A., Gippius, N. A. & Ishihara, T. Quasiguided modes and optical properties of photonic crystal slabs. Phys. Rev. B 66, 045102 (2002).
Weiss, T., Granet, G., Gippius, N. A., Tikhodeev, S. G. & Giessen, H. Matched coordinates and adaptive spatial resolution in the Fourier modal method. Opt. Express 17, 8051–8061 (2009).
Johnson, P. B. & Christy, R. W. Optical constants of the noble metals. Phys. Rev. B 6, 4370–4379 (1972).
Liu, N. et al. Three-dimensional photonic metamaterials at optical frequencies. Nat. Mater. 7, 31–37 (2008).
Deych, L. I. & Lisyansky, A. A. Polariton dispersion law in periodic-Bragg and near-Bragg multiple quantum well structures. Phys. Rev. B 62, 4242–4244 (2000).
Sun, G., Khurgin, J. B. & Soref, R. A. Plasmonic light-emission enhancement with isolated metal nanoparticles and their coupled arrays. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 25, 1748–1755 (2008).
Deych, L. I., Erementchouk, M. V. & Lisyansky, A. A. Spectral engineering with defect multiple-quantum-well structures. Appl. Phys. Lett. 83, 4562–4564 (2003).
Ameling, R. & Giessen, H. Cavity plasmonics: large normal mode splitting of electric and magnetic particle plasmons induced by a photonic microcavity. Nano Lett. 10, 4394–4398 (2010).
Ameling, R., Dregely, D. & Giessen, H. Strong coupling of localized and surface plasmons to microcavity modes. Opt. Lett. 36, 2218–2220 (2011).
Chanda, D. et al. Coupling of plasmonic and optical cavity modes in quasi-three-dimensional plasmonic crystals. Nat. Commun. 2, 479 (2011).
Noginov, M. A. et al. Demonstration of a spaser-based nanolaser. Nature 460, 1110–1113 (2009).
Xiao, S. et al. Loss-free and active optical negative-index metamaterials. Nature 466, 735–738 (2010).
Bergman, D. J. & Stockman, M. I. Surface plasmon amplification by stimulated emission of radiation: quantum generation of coherent surface plasmons in nanosystems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 027402 (2003).
Acknowledgements
We thank T. Pfau, S. G. Tikhodeev, P. V. Braun, S. W. Koch and N. Gippius for stimulating discussions, as well as U. Eigenthaler and B. Fenk for strong technical support. We gratefully acknowledge funding by BMBF (13N10146), DFG (SPP1391, FOR557/730), and BW-Stiftung. D.D. additionally acknowledges support by the Carl-Zeiss-Stiftung.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
A.C. conceived the original idea. D.D. and R.T. fabricated the sample. R.T. carried out the measurements. T.S., A.C. and R.T. designed and implemented the numerical and analytical calculations and analysed the data. R.T., T.S. and H.G. wrote the manuscript. All authors contributed to scientific discussion and critical revision of the article. H.G. supervised the study.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Taubert, R., Dregely, D., Stroucken, T. et al. Octave-wide photonic band gap in three-dimensional plasmonic Bragg structures and limitations of radiative coupling. Nat Commun 3, 691 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms1694
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms1694
This article is cited by
-
Octet lattice-based plate for elastic wave control
Scientific Reports (2022)
-
Composite media mixing Bragg and local resonances for highly attenuating and broad bandgaps
Scientific Reports (2013)
-
Tunable Omnidirectional Broadband Band-Stop Filter in Symmetric Hybrid Plasmonic Structures
Plasmonics (2013)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.