Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Geometry analysis and systematic synthesis of highly porous isoreticular frameworks with a unique topology


Porous coordination polymers are well known for their easily tailored framework structures and corresponding properties. Although systematic modulations of pore sizes of binary prototypes have gained great success, simultaneous adjustment of both pore size and shape of ternary prototypes remains unexplored, owing to the difficulty in controlling the self-assembly of multiple molecular building blocks. Here we show that simple geometry analysis can be used to estimate the influence of the linker lengths and length ratios on the synthesis/construction difficulties and framework stabilities of a highly symmetric, ternary prototype composed of a typical trinuclear metal cluster and two types of bridging carboxylate ligands. As predicted, systematic syntheses with 5×5 ligand combinations produced 13 highly porous isoreticular frameworks, which show not only systematic adjustment of pore volumes (0.49–2.04 cm3 g−1) and sizes (7.8–13.0 Å; 5.2–12.0 Å; 7.4–17.4 Å), but also anisotropic modulation of the pore shapes.


Systematic modulation of the pore size and shape of porous materials, especially without changing the structural prototype (connectivity or topology), is a rational strategy to enhance or optimize adsorption and separation performances. Compared with conventional adsorbents, porous coordination polymers (PCPs) or metal-organic frameworks are unique because of their designable frameworks and adjustable pore metrics (size/shape/surface)1,2,3,4,5. For example, linear dicarboxylates (L2) with different lengths and/or side groups have been incorporated into the pcu (lower-case, boldfaced three-letter notation for topological type) structure Zn4O(L2)3, although interpenetration sometimes occurs6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14. Nevertheless, until now, only very few prototypes have been systematically modulated, including the [M2(L4)(L1)2] (nbo net, L4=tetracarboxylate, L1=monodentate ligand)15,16,17,18,19, M2(L6)2/3(L1)2 (rht net, L6=hexacarboxylate)18,20,21,22,23,24, M33-O)(L2)3(L1)3 (acs net)25,26 and so on27,28,29,30,31,32. In these binary prototypes composed of only one kind of node and one kind of linker, the linker length controls the pore size rather than the pore shape. Alternatively, modulation of the pore shape can be implemented by changing the length ratio of the two types of linkers in the ternary prototypes (that is, one kind of cluster and two kinds of ligands). However, for most ternary systems, changing the length ratio of two types of ligands usually gives rise to diverse topologies. For example, connecting the Zn4O(O2CR)6 clusters by mixed dicarboxylates and tricarboxylates with different lengths produces PCPs with a general formula, Zn4O(L2)(L3)4/3 (L3=tricarboxylate), but different topologies such as muo, toz or ith-d33,34,35,36,37. Typical pillared-layer structures can change their pore heights by changing the pillar ligands, but their pore widths, determined by the layer structures, are generally unchangeable38,39,40,41. Although the jungle-gym-type framework Zn2(L2)2(L2N) (pcu net, L2N=exobidentate ligand similar to 4,4′-bipyridine) seems promising, most reported examples possess only one-dimensional square-shaped channels, because interpenetration occurs when the bipyridyl-type ligand is lengthened42,43,44,45,46,47. In short, systematic modulation of both pore size and shape remains largely unexplored and requires an in-depth understanding of the construction principle from molecular building blocks to network prototypes.

A recently reported porous metal carboxylate framework, [NiII2NiIII3-OH)(pba)3(ndc)1.5] (MCF-19), constructed from the Ni33-OH)(O2CR)6(L1)3 clusters, pyridylbenzoates and naphthalenedicarboxylates with a 2:6:3 ratio, represents a novel ternary prototype, because it possesses not only an unprecedented, uninodal, nine-connected ncb topology, but also a unique hierarchical channel-cavity biporous system48,49. Although a combination of two kinds of long linkers with similar lengths has been suggested as the key point for such an inherently tensile network, how ligand lengths (including length ratio) control the pore size/shape or even the construction possibility is not straightforward. In this report, these issues are addressed by using a geometry analysis approach, which is confirmed by the successful prediction of the outcome for a large-scale systematic synthesis with 5×5 linker combinations. Detailed characterization of the new series of 13 highly porous isoreticular frameworks shows that ligand lengths have an important role in determining not only the pore size, pore volume and surface area, but also the pore shape, framework distortion/stability and gas sorption behavior.


Reticular modelling and geometry analysis

The ncb net (the maximum lattice symmetry is the space group I-43m) has one kind of vertex (V, 3m symmetry, x=y=z=0.1875) and two kinds of edges (E1 and E2 with m and mm2 symmetries, respectively). Note that in an ideal ncb net, E1 and E2 have equal lengths (that is, E1/E2=1)50. The overall connectivity can be simplified as a body-centred cubic array (bcu topology) of triakis tetrahedra; that is, a central regular tetrahedron (4V+6E2) capped by four regular trigonal pyramids (4V+3E1+3E2, regular tetrahedral shape when E1/E2=1), connected in a cusp-to-umbilicus fashion (Fig. 1a).

Figure 1: Geometry analysis of the ncb net.
figure 1

(a) Perspective view of a fragment (only the cubic unit cell and two triakis tetrahedra, one at the centre and the other at the corner of the unit cell, are shown for clarity) of the ncb net composed of one kind of vertex (aka node) and two kinds of edges (red-blue and red sticks for E1 and E2, respectively) at its maximum symmetry of I-43m (black lines for unit cell). The ratio dr between the lengths of E1 and E2 can be calculated from the fractional coordinates or vertexes VA (x, y, z), VB (−y+0.5, x+0.5, −z+0.5), and VC (y+0.5, −x+0.5, −z+0.5) according to the crystal symmetry. (b) The node geometry can be described by three parameters (κ, φ, ω), two of which (κ, φ) are dependent on dr. The node geometry in the ideal ncb net obviously deviates (dr=1, κ=15.7°) from the ideal tricapped trigonal-prismatic geometry. (c) Perspective view of a common nine-connected trinuclear M33-O)(O2CR)6(L1)3 cluster showing the tricapped trigonal-prismatic geometry. (d) Mathematical relation of dr and the node position x (x=y=z). (e) Mathematical relation of the node geometry (κ, φ) and dr.

The nine-connected node in the idealized ncb exhibits a distorted tricapped trigonal-prismatic geometry (point group symmetry C3v; Fig. 1b), which obviously deviates from the regular ones (D3h) and the most similar secondary building units (SBUs; Fig. 1c, see discussion below) on the three capped sites. Nevertheless, the connectivity and crystal symmetry can be retained when moving the vertexes along the space diagonals of the unit cell (x=y=z, 0<x<0.5). But at the same time, the relative edge length (dr=E1/E2) and the node geometry will be altered, which is realistic because the lengths of pyridylcarboxylate and dicarboxylate are generally unequal. Using simple geometry calculations (Supplementary Fig. S1; Supplementary Methods), we deduced the relation between the node position and the relative edge length (Fig. 1d; Supplementary Fig. S2), in which a minimum of dr=0.5774 at x=0.375 represents the fusion of triakis tetrahedra into tetrahedra (Supplementary Fig. S3).

Owing to their regular tricapped trigonal-prismatic geometry, the trinuclear M33-O)(O2CR)6(L1)3 clusters (D3h) are the most appropriate candidates for the nine-connected node (using a ditopic ligand to function as two monodentate ligands L1), although distortion must occur when a real ncb network is constructed. To evaluate the difference in geometry between the node and the SBU, three parameters are required to describe the node geometry (Fig. 1e); that is, κ for the deviation angle of the E1 edge from the ideal capped position, φ for the angle between two adjacent E1 edges, and ω for the angle between two adjacent E2 edges. Obviously, κ and φ are dependent on dr, but ω is a constant (60°), as it is a part of the central regular tetrahedron. It can easily be identified from the diagram that the ideal ncb net (x=0.1875, dr=1) possesses a geometry with φ=60° and κ=15.7°, implying that connecting the M33-O)(O2CR)6(L1)3 clusters by ligands with equal lengths may not be the best construction strategy. Although κ can approach zero to match the SBU geometry, φ will be very small at the same time, which may result in a large steric hindrance between the adjacent carboxylates. For example, when κ=0° at dr=1.73, the corresponding φ=33.5° is far smaller than the angles between the nearest carboxylate groups in common discrete M33-O)(O2CR)6(L1)3 clusters (ca. 70°), whereas when φ approaches the ideal value of 70° at dr=0.87, κ=23.2° causes a large distortion on the pyridyl binding sites. In other words, not only κ but also φ determine the inner tension and/or the possibility to construct real ncb networks. Therefore, a reasonable dr value should be close to 0.87–1.73 for a balance between κ and φ. Considering that the included angle between carboxylates in common six-connected M33-O)(O2CR)6(L1)3 clusters can be changed in a certain range (28~90°) to give dynamic breathing frameworks (acs net)51, adjusting φ might be easier than changing κ, suggesting that an optimum dr should be closer to 1.73 rather than 0.87. In addition, as ω (60°) is also smaller than the angle between the nearest carboxylate groups in the SBUs (70°), the dicarboxylate ligand should have enough flexibility (or length) to compensate for the deviation.

Combinatorial syntheses

To verify the above analyses, a cross 5×5 ligand combination of (quasi-)linear pyridylcarboxylates (isonicotinate (ina), (E)-3(pyridine-4-yl)acrylate (pyac), 4-(pyridine-4-yl)benzoate (pba), (E)-4-(2-(pyridine-4yl)vinyl)benzoate (pvba), 4′-(pyridine-4-yl)biphenyl-5-carboxylate (pbpa)) and dicarboxylates (benzene-1,4-dicarboxylate (bdc2–), naphthalene-2,6-dicarboxylate (ndc2–), biphenyl-4,4′-dicarboxylate (bpdc2–), (E)-4,4′-(ethene-1,2-diyl)dibenzoate (edba2–), p-terphenyl-4,4″-dicarboxylate (tpdc2–)) with successively increasing lengths (ca. 2.2 Å per step, see Supplementary Table S1) was employed to construct the targeted ncb network. Notably, ina is the shortest pyridylcarboxylate, and bdc2– is the shortest known dicarboxylate that can connect the M33-O)(O2CR)6(L1)3 SBUs into a regular tetrahedral cage. To calculate the hypothetic node geometries, not only the ligand lengths but also the volume of the SBU (distances between donor atoms and the center of the SBU, which are 3.2 Å for the carboxylate and 4.0 Å for the pyridyl) was considered. Although the calculations showed that some combinations exceeded the optimum interval of dr (Supplementary Table S1), all 5×5 ligand combinations were tried in the synthetic experiments, and all the solid products obtained were subjected to powder and/or single-crystal X-ray diffraction analyses (Supplementary Figs S4–S29; Supplementary Tables S2 and S3).

So far, 13 isoreticular open frameworks (denoted as Ia, IIa, IIb, IIIa, IIIb, IIIc, IVa, IVb, IVc, Va, Vb, Vc and Vd) with the expected ncb topology and the general formula [NiII2NiIII3-OH)(LP)3(L2)1.5] (LP=pyridylcarboxylate) have been successfully isolated from the 15 ligand combinations with 0.87<dr<1.73 (Supplementary Figs S30–S32). For ligand combinations with dr<0.87, only amorphous solids or other undesired products have been found under the various tested synthetic conditions (different solvents, temperatures, additives and so on have been tried). Also, attempts to synthesize several structures with dr close to 0.87 and/or 1.73 still resulted in low yields and poor reproducibility (Supplementary Fig. S29; Supplementary Table S2). These results indicate that dr can be used to predict the difficulty in the synthesis of ncb-type frameworks. As shown in Supplementary Table S1, the ligand combination with dr>1.73 requires an extremely long pyridylcarboxylate ligand, such a ligand is beyond the range of our examination.

Crystal structures

All isoreticular frameworks obtained are basically isostructural (Fig. 2a; Supplementary Figs S4–S28; Supplementary Table S3). The planar Ni33-OH) core units are encapsulated by six carboxylate groups (from the three dicarboxylates and three pyridylcarboxylates) and three pyridyl groups (from other three pyridylcarboxylates), forming nine-connected tricapped trigonal-prismatic SBUs (Supplementary Table S4). As defined by the tiling of the ncb topology (1[34]+4[34]+3[34.44]), all compounds obtained possess tetrahedral, trigonal-pyramidal and quasi-bisdisphenoidal cavities (denoted as cA, cB and cC, respectively) in a 1:4:3 ratio. Each cA connects with four cBs through small apertures (the aperture between cA and cB, denoted as aAB) to form a triakis tetrahedral cage, which is arranged in a bcu array, but is isolated from each other. Each cC connects to four neighbors through large apertures (aCC) to form a three-dimensional intersecting nbo channel (dual of bcu). Finally, the isolated bcu cavities connect to the nbo channel through small apertures between cB and cC (aBC), furnishing a hierarchical channel-cavity biporous system (Fig. 2b).

Figure 2: X-ray single-crystal structures and topology of pore systems.
figure 2

(a) Perspective views of the triakis tetrahedral building units with the pore surface of the embedded cA (green) and cB (yellow) cavities of the obtained isoreticular frameworks listed in the same order as in Supplementary Table S1. (b) The pore system defined by the isoreticular ncb frameworks is an interpenetrated network between a bcu array of isolated triakis tetrahedra composed of one tetrahedron (cA, green) with four trigonal pyramids (cB, yellow) and an nbo array of quasi-bisdisphenoids (cC, orange). Note that the topologies ncb, bcu and nbo all possess the cubic symmetry (black lines represent the unit cell).

As is in the case of other prototypes, the solvent-accessible void of the ncb framework is dependent on the length of each ligand. The calculated crystal densities and pore volumes for Ia-Vd are 0.39–1.06 g cm−3 and 0.49–2.04 cm3 g−1, respectively (Fig. 3a). With N2 as a probe, the calculated accessible surface areas of the isoreticular frameworks vary from 970 to 4,760 m2 g−1 (Fig. 3b)52. More interestingly, changing the ratio of the lengths between pyridylcarboxylate and dicarboxylate can anisotropically modulate the pore size/shape (Fig. 3c; Supplementary Figs S33–S45; Supplementary Table S5). The shape of cA is basically maintained as a regular tetrahedron, and its size is only determined by the dicarboxylate length, which has a diameter of 7.8, 9.4, 11.2 and 13.0 Å for bdc2–, ndc2–, bpdc2– and edba2–, respectively. In contrast, the shape of cB can be tuned by dr or the ratio of lengths of the two linkers. When dr≈1 (for example, IIIb), the shape of cB is tetrahedral (similar to that of cA). Otherwise, cB becomes elongated (dr>1, for example, IIIb) or flattened (dr<1, for example, IIIc). It should be noted that isoreticular PCPs with changeable pore shapes are still rarely encountered in the literature42,43,44,45,46. As cC is mainly composed of pyridylcarboxylate edges, its shape is basically unchanged, and its size is mainly determined by the pyridylcarboxylate length, which is about 7.4, 10, 12, 14 and 17 Å for ina, pyac, pba, pvba and pbpa, respectively. Furthermore, such a systematic modulation can finally alter the relative volume ratio between the channel and the cavities of each framework (Fig. 3d; Supplementary Table S5). For instance, the relative channel/cavity volume ratios are 2.31, 1.72 and 1.51 for IIIa, IIIb and IIIc, respectively, which combine the same pyridylcarboxylate pba with longer dicarboxylates bdc2–, ndc2– and bpdc2–.

Figure 3: Systematic modulation of pore metrics.
figure 3

(a) Framework densities and pore volumes. (b) Accessible and Connolly surface areas. (c) Pore sizes of three types of cavities. (d) Total and individual percentages of volume of the three types of cavities.

A comparison of determined crystal structures with the corresponding predicted ncb network models (with different dr values) can provide a better understanding of how the molecular building blocks adjust their shapes to fit the node geometries. Several parameters were used to evaluate the geometries of the SBUs and the ligands, as well as the connection between them, which include the deviation angle of the coordinated nitrogen atom from the triangular Ni3 plane (κ′), the angle between the pyridyl group and the corresponding N–Ni bond (κ″), the included angles of two adjacent carboxylate groups between two pyridylcarboxylates (φ′) and between two dicarboxylates (ω′), and the bending degrees of the pyridylcarboxylate (δ1) and dicarboxylate (δ2), defined as the ratio of arced height over chord length of the ligands (Fig. 4).

Figure 4: Schematic illustration of the distortion of the molecular building blocks in the isoreticular frameworks.
figure 4

(a) Distortions of the trinuclear SBU can be described by three parameters, that is, κ′ for the deviation angle of coordinated nitrogen atom from the triangular Ni3 plane (κ′=0° for the non-distorted structure), φ′ for the included angle of two adjacent carboxylate groups between two pyridylcarboxylates (φ′=70° for the non-distorted structure), and ω′ for the included angle of two adjacent carboxylate groups between two dicarboxylates (ω″=70° for the non-distorted structure). The distorted connection between the trinuclear SBU and the ligands can be evaluated by the included angle between the pyridyl group and corresponding N–Ni bond (κ″). (b) Distortions of the organic ligands are defined as the ratio of arced height over chord length of the ligands, using δ1 for the pyridylcarboxylate and δ2 for the dicarboxylate (except the pyridyl rings, the aromatic backbones are simplified as solid lines for clarity).

As shown in Table 1, the κ′ angles are basically very small in contrast to the corresponding κ angles, illustrating the binding rigidity of the SBUs' equatorial planes. With a relatively short and rigid pyridylcarboxylate pba, κ″ (2.2, 4.8 and 9.3° for IIIa, IIIb and IIIc, respectively) increases along with increasing κ (6.9, 12.2 and 17.5° for IIIa, IIIb and IIIc, respectively), suggesting that the structure adjustment or compensation starts by bending the pyridyl rings from the Ni–N bond directions, with the pyridyl N atom as the knee, which should be energetically unstable compared with a linear pyridyl-metal coordination (that is, κ″=0°). The residual required κ (κ>κ′+κ″) is finally achieved by bending the pba backbone (2.3, 4.3 and 5.4%). For the longer and more flexible pvba, κ″ in IVa, IVb and IVc (2.0°, 1.4° and 3.2°, respectively) basically remains unaltered albeit κ is 3.5°, 7.8° and 12.5°, respectively. Obviously, the required distortions are mainly provided by the inherently bent pvba (δ1=9.0, 11.6 and 8.0%).

Table 1 Comparison of framework distortion with thermal stability.

With an even longer but relatively rigid pbpa, the situation is more complicated. The observed κ′ (1.4°), κ′, (0.8°) and δ (5.4%) are reasonable for Vc. However, κ′ (2.9° and 1.4°) and κ″ (1.9° and 4.7°) exceed the κ (0.9° and 4.7°) for Va and Vb, respectively. Moreover, the observed φ′ angle (24.1°) for Va is not located between the required φ angle (35.1°) and the ideal value of 70°. A detailed inspection of the crystal structure reveals that the SBU is now distorted from C3v to C3 symmetry by twisting the carboxylate groups of the pbpa ligands, which avoids the steric hindrance required by the extremely small φ. These significant distortions are compensated for by changing in the other segments of the whole network, that is, κ′ and κ″. With larger φ angles, the carboxylate groups of pyridylcarboxylates are less distorted in Vb and almost not distorted in Vc. The small φ in IVa could be compensated for by the flexible pvba.

As the capped binding sites of SBU possess specifically pointing directions, the linkers should possess enough length or flexibility to compensate for the required κ, although the steric hindrance between the adjacent carboxylate groups requires them to twist in a skew-coordination manner to adopt the extremely small φ angles. Therefore, shorter and/or less flexible linkers can hardly fulfill the required bending or avoid the steric hindrance in forming the ncb frameworks. The above discussions may be useful for understanding the difficulty in the synthesis of Ia (κ′+κ″=16.7°), IIb (κ′+κ″=12.9°), IIIc (κ′+κ″=9.3°), IVc (δ1=8.0%) and Va (φ′=24.9°).

Thermal stabilities

Although the thermal stability of PCPs is usually ascribed to the porosity and robustness of the coordination bonds, the SBU and the organic ligand, the structural stability of the underlying prototype or the inner tension of the framework has been rarely considered. In this context, the isoreticular frameworks obtained in this work represent an inherently tensile system for studying the influence of porosity and framework distortion on the thermal stability.

Although thermogravimetric analyses showed that all the isoreticular frameworks similarly decomposed above 350 °C (Supplementary Fig. S46), variable-temperature powder X-ray diffraction (Supplementary Figs S47–S58) studies indicated that their critical temperatures of framework collapse (Tc) are very different from each other, and also are obviously lower than 350 °C (Table 1). Considering that common isoreticular PCPs usually collapse at similar temperatures16, the above observation implies that the isoreticular ncb frameworks studied here possess notable and different degrees of inner tensions. Although the Tc values of the studied ncb frameworks basically decrease as the porosity increases, they could not be explained solely by the voids or pore volumes of the corresponding crystal structures. Alternatively, the node geometry may also be an influencing factor. Taking IIIa (void=66.3%, κ″=2.2°, Tc=300 °C), IIIb (void=68.2%, κ″=4.8°, Tc=240 °C) and IIIc (void=70.9%, κ″=9.3°, Tc=210 °C) as an example, the void just grows slightly, but Tc steeply decreases, which could be explained by the fast-growing κ″. The importance of the framework distortion may be greater than that of porosity, which can be illustrated by comparison between IVa (void=71.5%, κ″=2.0°, Tc=250 °C) and IIIc (void=70.9%, κ″=9.3°, Tc=210 °C), and also between Vb (void=76.6%, κ″=4.7°, Tc=160 °C) and Vc (void=78.3%, κ″=0.8°, Tc=180 °C).

Adsorption properties

Porous properties of IIIa, IIIb and IIIc were characterized by N2, CO2 and H2 sorption measurements. As seen from their crystal structures, the three compounds possess not only gradually increasing total pore volumes/sizes very similar to other reported isoreticular PCPs, but also very different channel-cavity characteristics (pore sizes/shapes are very similar for nbo channels, but very different for bcu cavities). These characteristics would be useful for revealing the structural modulation effect of the ternary prototype ncb. For comparison, the same measurements were also performed for Ia with a significantly smaller pore size. As shown in Supplementary Figures S59 and S60, the four isoreticular frameworks can be readily activated for gas sorption measurements.

N2 isotherms of IIIa, IIIb and IIIc revealed apparent Langmuir surface areas of 2,681, 2,706 and 2,841 m2 g−1, Brunauer–Emmett–Teller surface areas of 2,525, 2,610 and 2,738 m2 g−1, and pore volumes (Dubinin–Astakhov) of 0.95, 0.96 and 1.04 cm3 g−1, respectively, being similar to those predicted from their crystal structures (Fig. 5a). Low-pressure H2 adsorption isotherms for IIIa, IIIb and IIIc showed similar gravimetric uptakes of ca. 1.7 wt% (Fig. 5b), but decreasing volumetric uptakes of 11.5, 10.5 and 9.8 g l−1, respectively, at 1 bar and 77 K (Fig. 5c), consistent with their similar surface areas and pore volumes, as well as different framework densities. High-pressure sorption measurements showed very high gravimetric (Fig. 5d) and volumetric (Supplementary Fig. S61) H2 uptakes for IIIa, IIIb and IIIc at 77 K and 50 bar. However, all three isotherms have not reached saturation at the highest measured pressures, which can be ascribed to the inert pore surfaces (there are no active sites such as a coordinatively unsaturated metal centre) and large pore sizes. Nevertheless, the excess and absolute H2 uptakes follow IIIa>IIIb>IIIc, indicating that the host–guest interactions or confinement effects are stronger for a smaller pore size53. In comparison with IIIaIIIc, Ia possesses much smaller pore sizes and have a substantially lower surface area (1,019 and 880 m2 g−1 for Langmuir and Brunauer–Emmett–Teller, respectively), a pore volume (0.36 cm3 g−1) and a H2-uptake capacity, but has a stronger adsorption at low pressures. The above discussions about host–guest interactions were confirmed by the H2 adsorption enthalpies calculated by isotherms measured at 77 and 87 K (Supplementary Fig. S62). The H2 adsorption enthalpy at zero coverage is ca. 8.0 kJ mol−1 for Ia, being similar to other ultramicroporous frameworks. In contrast, the large-pore frameworks IIIa, IIIb and IIIc possess lower enthalpies around 4.5–5.5 kJ mol−1 (Fig. 5e).

Figure 5: Gas sorption properties.
figure 5

(a) N2 sorption adsorption (filled) and desorption (open) isotherms measured at 77 K, (b) gravimetric H2 uptakes measured at 77 K (filled) and 87 K (open) up to 120 kPa, (c) volumetric H2 uptakes measured at 77 K (filled) and 87 K (open) up to 120 kPa, (d) excess (open) and absolute (filled) H2 uptakes measured at 77 K up to 50 bar, (e) coverage-dependent H2 adsorption enthalpies calculated from the low-pressure isotherms measured at 77 and 87 K by the virial fitting method (lines) and Clausius–Claperyron equation (symbols), and (f) CO2 adsorption (filled) and desorption (open) isotherms measured at 195 K for Ia (black), IIIa (red), IIIb (green) and IIIc (blue).

The CO2 sorption isotherms of IIIa, IIIb and IIIc showed obvious two-step features (Fig. 5f). Careful examination of the CO2 isotherm of Ia also revealed an unobvious step at low relative pressure (Supplementary Fig. S63). Previously, a gating mechanism, that is, before the step adsorption occurred only in the nbo channel, and after the step adsorption occurred in both the nbo channel and bcu cavities, was proposed to explain the two-step CO2 isotherm shape for IIIb, because the small aperture (aBC) between the nbo channel and bcu cavity may block the diffusion of CO2, which was well supported by the Langmuir surface areas of the two steps48. Obviously, the gating mechanism cannot simultaneously explain the four CO2 isotherms as shown in Figure 5f and Supplementary Figure S63, because the onset pressure of the step is lower for the smaller gate size. On the basis of the structural relationships of the measured isoreticular frameworks, the four CO2 isotherms can be elucidated by a capillary condensation mechanism. The small slopes before the steps are related to the weak host–guest interaction. The onset pressure of the step (capillary condensation starts) is lower for smaller pores.

To examine the pore size/shape effect on guest diffusion, CO2 adsorption kinetic data were measured, which can be fitted well by a double-exponential model (Supplementary Figs S64–S67). In other words, the CO2 diffusion in the hierarchical pore systems could be divided into a fast component within the large nbo channel (determined by aCC) and a slow one through the small entrances of the bcu cavities (determined by aBC)54. As shown in Supplementary Figures S68–S71, the small aBC apertures in IIIa and IIIb comparable to the size of CO2 exhibit an obvious restriction on the diffusion into the bcu cavities, which may be overwhelmed by increasing the pressure. In contrast, IIIc with obviously larger aBC apertures has no such effect, and the main restriction should likely arise from steric hindrance of the adsorbed CO2 molecules. In this context, the isoreticular ncb frameworks with well-controlled hierarchical biporous structures can demonstrate systematical modulation on not only the surface area, pore volume and sorption affinity, but also guest diffusion kinetics.


The simple, highly symmetric ncb topology represents a novel ternary network prototype, in which the pore size/shape and the cavity/channel void ratio can be altered by changing the two kinds of linkers. Unlike other well-studied prototypes, even the most suitable molecular building blocks still deviate obviously from the network geometry of ncb, representing a challenge for the rational design and construction of this unique structure.

Using a geometry analysis approach, we showed that the difficulty of construction of the ncb-type frameworks can be evaluated simply by the ratio of the lengths of the two kinds of ligands. A new series of highly porous, isoreticular frameworks have been constructed, which illustrate systematic adjustment of pore size and anisotropic modulation of pore shapes, as well as the influence of the ligand–length ratio on the geometry of the molecular building blocks and the framework stabilities. Although computer modelling (for example, quantum/molecular mechanics) is very powerful for predicting the properties of molecules and crystalline networks, the geometry analysis approach is simple, fast, facile and efficient for even very complicated systems (containing a large number of atoms and/or transition metal, especially open-shell ones). Also, the geometry analysis results of isostructural structures with different number and type of atoms can be directly compared. Considering that numerous topologies have been known, many of which have similar complexity to ncb, the geometry analysis method or mathematical idea may be applied for other prototypes and enlighten crystal design and targeted assembly of new PCPs.



The ligands H2tpdc, Hpba, Hpvba and Hpbpa were synthesized according to the literature (Supplementary Methods). Other reagents were commercially available and used without further purification.

Preparation of isoreticular frameworks

A methanol (2.0 ml) solution of Ni(NO3)2.6H2O was added into an amide solution (22 ml) of pyridylcarboxylic acid, dicarboxylic acid and NaOH (or 40% tetrabutylammonium hydroxide methanol solution). The mixture was heated at 65 °C and stirred for 1 h, and then sealed in a 50-ml Teflon-lined stainless steel vessel, which was heated to 120–160 °C for 72 h. Upon cooling down to room temperature at a rate of 5 °C h−1, solid products were isolated by filtration or centrifuge, which were identified by single-crystal X-ray diffraction and/or powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) analyses. After many trials, 13 targeted compounds have been successfully isolated, whose chemical formulae and purity were confirmed by PXRD (Supplementary Figs S17–S28), elemental analysis (EA), Fourier-transform infrared spectra (Supplementary Methods), magnetic susceptibility measurement (Supplementary Figs S30–S32 and Supplementary Methods) and thermogravimetric analysis (Supplementary Fig. S46).

[Ni33-OH)(ina)3(bdc)1.5]·2.5DMA·CH3OH (Ia) was prepared by mixing Ni(NO3)2.6H2O (1,740 mg, 6.0 mmol), Hina (738 mg, 6.0 mmol), H2bdc (498 mg, 3.0 mmol) and NaOH (560 mg, 14.0 mmol) in N,N′-dimethylacetamide (DMA) at 160 °C (yield 650 mg, ca. 30%). EA calculated (%) for C41H45.5N5.5O16.5Ni3: C 46.66, H 4.35, N 7.30; found: C 46.46, H 4.50, N 7.36.

[Ni33-OH)(pyac)3(bdc)1.5]·5.5DMF·5.5H2O (IIa) was prepared by mixing Ni(NO3)2.6H2O (435 mg, 1.5 mmol), Hpyac (220 mg, 1.5 mmol), H2bdc (125 mg, 0.75 mmol) and tetrabutylammonium hydroxide (2.5 ml, 3.5 mmol) in N,N′-dimethylformide (DMF) at 140 °C (yield 120 mg, ca. 20%, poor reproducibility). EA calculated (%) for C52.5H74.5N8.5O24Ni3: C 45.54, H 5.42, N 8.60; found: C 45.23, H 5.01, N 8.78.

[Ni33-OH)(pyac)3(ndc)1.5]·6DMF·6H2O (IIb) was prepared by mixing Ni(NO3)2.6H2O (435 mg, 1.5 mmol), Hpyac (220 mg, 1.5 mmol), H2ndc (162 mg, 0.75 mmol) and tetrabutylammonium hydroxide (2.5 ml, 3.5 mmol) in DMF at 140 °C (yield 230 mg, ca. 30%). EA calculated (%) for C60H82N9O25Ni3: C 47.87, H 5.49, N 8.37; found: C 47.00, H 6.03, N 8.94.

[Ni33-OH)(pba)3(bdc)1.5]·8DMA·2CH3OH·4H2O (IIIa) was prepared by mixing Ni(NO3)2.6H2O (870 mg, 3.0 mmol), Hpba (600 mg, 3 mmol), H2bdc (250 mg, 1.5 mmol) and NaOH (280 mg, 7.0 mmol) in DMA at 160 °C (yield 1,300 mg, ca. 70%). EA calculated (%) for C82H119N11O27Ni3: C 52.75, H 6.42, N 8.25; found: C 52.38, H 6.48, N 8.66.

[Ni33-OH)(pba)3(ndc)1.5]·10.5DMA·2CH3OH·2H2O (IIIb) was prepared by mixing Ni(NO3)2.6H2O (870 mg, 3.0 mmol), Hpba (600 mg, 3 mmol), H2ndc (330 mg, 1.5 mmol) and NaOH (280 mg, 7.0 mmol) in DMA at 160 °C (yield 1,400 mg, ca. 65%). EA calculated (%) for C98H140.5N13.5O27.5Ni3: C 55.42, H 6.67, N 8.90; found: C 54.13, H 6.70, N 9.08.

[Ni33-OH)(pba)3(bpdc)1.5]·11.5DMA·0.5CH3OH·7H2O (IIIc) was prepared by mixing Ni(NO3)2.6H2O (870 mg, 3.0 mmol), Hpba (600 mg, 3 mmol), H2bpdc (380 mg, 1.5 mmol) and NaOH (280 mg, 7.0 mmol) in DMA at 160 °C (yield 1,000 mg, ca. 45%, poor reproducibility). EA calculated (%) for C103.5H156.5N14.5O32Ni3: C 54.24, H 6.88, N 8.86; found: C 53.98, H 7.06, N 9.00.

[Ni33-OH)(pvba)3(bdc)1.5]11.5DMA11H2O (IVa) was prepared by mixing Ni(NO3)2.6H2O (870 mg, 3.0 mmol), Hpvba (670 mg, 3 mmol), H2bdc (250 mg, 1.5 mmol) and NaOH (280 mg, 7.0 mmol) in DMA at 160 °C (yield 900 mg, ca. 40%). EA calculated (%) for C100H162.5N14.5O35.5Ni3: C 51.95, H 7.08, N 8.78; found: C 51.79, H 6.92, N 8.98.

[Ni33-OH)(pvba)3(ndc)1.5]15DMA·10H2O (IVb) was prepared by mixing Ni(NO3)2.6H2O (870 mg, 3.0 mmol), Hpvba (670 mg, 3 mmol), H2ndc (33 mg, 0.15 mmol) and NaOH (280 mg, 7.0 mmol) in DMA at 160 °C (yield 1,600 mg, ca. 60%). EA calculated (%) for C120H195N18O38Ni3: C 53.90, H 7.35, N 9.43; found: C 53.42, H 7.38, N 9.57.

[Ni33-OH)(pvba)3(bpdc)1.5]·16.5DMA·CH3OH·10.5H2O (IVc) was prepared by mixing Ni(NO3)2.6H2O (870 mg, 3.0 mmol), Hpvba (670 mg, 3 mmol), H2bpdc (380 mg, 1.5 mmol) and NaOH (280 mg, 7.0 mmol) in DMA at 160 °C (yield 280 mg, ca. 10%). EA calculated (%) for C130H216.5N19.5O41Ni3: C 54.12, H 7.56, N 9.47; found: C 53.14, H 7.22, N 9.48.

[Ni33-OH)(pbpa)3(bdc)1.5]12DMA7CH3OH (Va) was prepared by mixing Ni(NO3)2.6H2O (435 mg, 1.5 mmol), Hpbpa (415 mg, 1.5 mmol), H2bdc (125 mg, 0.75 mmol) and tetrabutylammonium hydroxide (2.5 ml, 3.5 mmol) in DMA at 150 °C (yield 140 mg, ca. 10%). EA calculated (%) for C121H179N15O32Ni3: C 57.40, H 7.13, N 8.30; found: C 56.80, H 8.24, N 8.43.

[Ni33-OH)(pbpa)3(ndc)1.5]15DMA20H2O (Vb) was prepared by mixing Ni(NO3)2.6H2O (435 mg, 1.5 mmol), Hpbpa (415 mg, 1.5 mmol), H2ndc (165 mg, 0.75 mmol) and tetrabutylammonium hydroxide (2.5 ml, 3.5 mmol) in DMA at 150 °C (yield 230 mg, ca. 15%). EA calculated (%) for C132H221N18O48Ni3: C 52.77, H 7.41, N 8.39; found: C 52.44, H 6.95, N 8.72.

[Ni33-OH)(pbpa)3(bpdc)1.5]22DMA28H2O (Vc) was prepared by mixing Ni(NO3)2.6H2O (435 mg, 1.5 mmol), Hpbpa (415 mg, 1.5 mmol), H2bpdc (190 mg, 0.75 mmol) and tetrabutylammonium hydroxide (2.5 ml, 3.5 mmol) in DMA at 150 °C (yield 760 mg, ca. 40%). EA calculated (%) for C163H303N25O63Ni3: C 51.56, H 8.04, N 9.22; found: C 51.57, H 7.56, N 9.21.

[Ni33-OH)(pba)3(edba)1.5xG (Vd) was obtained by mixing Ni(NO3)2.6H2O (87 mg, 0.3 mmol), Hpbpa (83 mg, 0.3 mmol), H2edba (40 mg, 0.15 mmol) and tetrabutylammonium hydroxide (2.5 ml, 3.5 mmol) in DMA at 150 °C. Only a few crystals have been isolated for single-crystal diffraction study and the reproducibility is very poor.

The unsuccessful combinations were retried with modified synthetic conditions (different solvents or mixed solvents, stoichiometric ratios of reactants, synthetic temperature and time, and so on); however, only some unidentified microcrystalline products or amorphous floccules were obtained (Supplementary Table S2 and Supplementary Fig. S29).


Elemental analyses were performed using the Vario EL element analyzer with as-synthesized sample. Thermogravimetric analyses were carried out using a TA Instruments Q50 Thermogravimetric Analyzer under N2 at the rate of 5 °C min−1. PXRD patterns were recorded on a Bruker D8-Advance diffractometer using Cu Kα radiation and LynxEye detector. Variable-temperature PXRD analyses were facilitated with an Anton Paar TTK-450 sample stage under N2 flow. The temperature was increased at the rate of 0.1 °C s−1, and kept for 15 min before measurement at each targeted temperature. Magnetic property measurements were carried on a Quantum Design SQUID magnetometer MPMS XL-7 using degassed samples.

X-ray single-crystal structure analyses

Diffraction data were collected on a Bruker APEX CCD Diffractometer with graphite-monochromated Mo Kα radiation or an Oxford Gemini S Ultra CCD diffractometer using mirror-monochromated Cu Kα radiation.

The crystal structures were solved through Patterson methods and developed by difference Fourier techniques using the SHELXTL and Olex 2 software packages. Structures Ia, IIIa, IIIc, Va and Vc were well solved in the I-43m space group, because their ligands obey the symmetry requirement of the maximum-symmetry form of ncb net; that is, E1 (pyridylcarboxylate) possesses m symmetry and E2 (dicarboxylate) possesses mm2 symmetry. The absence of the mm2 symmetry of dicarboxylates may lead to lower symmetry structures I23 (IIIb and Vb). The absence of the m symmetry of the pyridylcarboxylates can lead to another lower-symmetry structure of P-43n (IIb). Solving these structures in I-43m resulted in symmetry-imposed disorder of the ligands. In some cases, low-symmetry ligands may be statistically disordered in I23, P-43n and I-43m. Therefore, their structures were solved in the high-symmetry space group I-43m (IIa, IVa, IVb, IVc and Vd). As some phenyl rings are disordered, appropriate restraints were applied in the refinements. Hydrogen atoms were generated geometrically and refined using a riding model. As the very disordered solvent molecules could not be modelled, PLATON/SQUEEZE procedures were used to remove the contribution of reflection by the guest solvent molecules.

Crystallographic data for Ia, IIa, IIb, IIIa, IIIb, IIIc, IVa, IVb, IVc, Va, Vb, Vc and Vd have been deposited in the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Center under deposition numbers CCDC 856758–856770 (Supplementary Data 1).

Sorption measurements and analyses

As-synthesized samples were immersed in dichloromethane for 3–5 days, during which dichloromethane was refreshed three times a day. After that, the samples were washed by acetone for several times, then filtered and quickly transferred to the sample cells for sorption measurements. Thermogravimetric analysis and PXRD were applied to confirm the complete solvent exchange and retention of crystallinity (Supplementary Figs S59 and S60).

Low-pressure gas sorption experiments (up to 120 kPa) were carried out on a Micromeritics ASAP 2020 M Physisorption Analyzer. Ultrahigh-purity-grade (purity >99.999%) N2, H2, CO2 and He gases were used in all adsorption measurements. High-pressure H2 sorption experiments (0~50 bar) were carried out on a BELSORP-HP volumetric adsorption apparatus. Temperatures were maintained by liquid nitrogen, liquid argon and dry ice-acetone baths. The coverage-dependent adsorption enthalpies (isosteric heat, Qst) of H2 were calculated from the sorption data measured at 77 and 87 K by the virial fitting method and the Clausius–Claperyron equation. Kinetic data for CO2 adsorption at 195 K were collected simultaneously with the isotherms by the rate of adsorption function.

Additional information

How to cite this article: Zhang, Y.-B. et al. Geometry analysis and systematic synthesis of highly porous isoreticular frameworks with a unique topology. Nat. Commun. 3:642 doi: 10.1038/ncomms1654 (2012).


  1. Férey, G. Hybrid porous solids: past, present, future. Chem. Soc. Rev. 37, 191–214 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Yaghi, O. M. et al. Reticular synthesis and the design of new materials. Nature 423, 705–714 (2003).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Morris, R. E. & Bu, X. H. Induction of chiral porous solids containing only achiral building blocks. Nat. Chem. 2, 353–361 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Takashima, Y. et al. Molecular decoding using luminescence from an entangled porous framework. Nat. Commun. 2, 168 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Xiang, S.- C. et al. Rationally tuned micropores within enantiopure metal-organic frameworks for highly selective separation of acetylene and ethylene. Nat. Commun. 2, 204 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Li, H., Eddaoudi, M., O'Keeffe, M. & Yaghi, O. M. Design and synthesis of an exceptionally stable and highly porous metal-organic framework. Nature 402, 276–279 (1999).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Eddaoudi, M. et al. Systematic design of pore size and functionality in isoreticular MOFs and their application in methane storage. Science 295, 469–472 (2002).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Xue, M. et al. New prototype isoreticular metal-organic framework Zn4O(FMA)3 for gas storage. Inorg. Chem. 48, 4649–4651 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Li, Q. W. et al. Docking in metal-organic frameworks. Science 325, 855–859 (2009).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kesanli, B. et al. Highly interpenetrated metal-organic frameworks for hydrogen storage. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 44, 72–75 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Song, F., Wang, C., Falkowski, J. M., Ma, L. & Lin, W. Isoreticular chiral metal-organic frameworks for asymmetric alkene epoxidation: tuning catalytic activity by controlling framework catenation and varying open channel sizes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 15390–15398 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Deshpande, R. K., Minnaar, J. L. & Telfer, S. G. Thermo labile groups in metal-organic frameworks: suppression of network interpenetration, post-synthetic cavity expansion, and protection of reactive functional groups. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 49, 4598–4602 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lun, D. J., Waterhouse, G. I. N. & Telfer, S. G. A general thermolabile protecting group strategy for organocatalytic metal-organic frameworks. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 5806–5809 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rowsell, J. L. C. & Yaghi, O. M. Effects of functionalization, catenation, and variation of the metal oxide and organic linking units on the low-pressure hydrogen adsorption properties of metal-organic frameworks. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128, 1304–1315 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chen, B. L., Ockwig, N. W., Millward, A. R., Contreras, D. S. & Yaghi, O. M. High H2 adsorption in a microporous metal-organic framework with open metal sites. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 44, 4745–4749 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lin, X. et al. High H2 adsorption by coordination-framework materials. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 45, 7358–7364 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lin, X. et al. High capacity hydrogen adsorption in Cu(II) tetracarboxylate framework materials: the role of pore size, ligand functionalization, and exposed metal sites. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 2159–2171 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Yan, Y. et al. Exceptionally high H2 storage by a metal-organic polyhedral framework. Chem. Commun. 1025–1027 (2009).

  19. Ma, S. et al. Metal-organic framework from an anthracene derivative containing nanoscopic cages exhibiting high methane uptake. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 1012–1016 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Yan, Y. et al. Metal-organic polyhedral frameworks: high H2 adsorption capacities and neutron powder diffraction studies. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 4092–4094 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhao, D., Yuan, D., Sun, D. & Zhou, H.- C. Stabilization of metal-organic frameworks with high surface areas by the incorporation of mesocavities with microwindows. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 9186–9188 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Yuan, D. Q., Zhao, D., Sun, D. F. & Zhou, H. C. An isoreticular series of metal-organic frameworks with dendritic hexacarboxylate ligands and exceptionally high gas-uptake capacity. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 49, 5357–5361 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Farha, O. K. et al. De novo synthesis of a metal-organic framework material featuring ultrahigh surface area and gas storage capacities. Nat. Chem. 2, 944–948 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zheng, B., Bai, J., Duan, J., Wojtas, L. & Zaworotko, M. J. Enhanced CO2 binding affinity of a high-uptake rht-type metal-organic framework decorated with acylamide groups. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 748–751 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sudik, A. C., Côté, A. P. & Yaghi, O. M. Metal-organic frameworks based on trigonal prismatic building blocks and the new “acs” topology. Inorg. Chem. 44, 2998–3000 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Surblé, S., Serre, C., Mellot-Draznieks, C., Millange, F. & Férey, G. A new isoreticular class of metal-organic-frameworks with the MIL-88 topology. Chem. Commun. 284–286 (2006).

  27. Férey, G. et al. A chromium terephthalate-based solid with unusually large pore volumes and surface area. Science 309, 2040–2042 (2005).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Sonnauer, A. et al. Giant pores in a chromium 2,6-naphthalenedicarboxylate open-framework structure with MIL-101 topology. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 48, 3791–3794 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ma, L. & Lin, W. Unusual interlocking and interpenetration lead to highly porous and robust metal-organic frameworks. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 48, 3637–3640 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ma, L. & Lin, W. Chirality-controlled and solvent-templated catenation isomerism in metal-organic frameworks. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 13834–13835 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Ma, L., Falkowski, J. M., Abney, C. & Lin, W. A series of isoreticular chiral metal-organic frameworks as a tunable platform for asymmetric catalysis. Nat. Chem. 2, 838–846 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Clearfield, A. Unconventional metal organic frameworks: porous cross-linked phosphonates. Dalton Trans. 6089–6102 (2008).

  33. Koh, K., Wong-Foy, A. G. & Matzger, A. J. A crystalline mesoporous coordination copolymer with high microporosity. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 47, 677–680 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Klein, N. et al. A mesoporous metal-organic framework. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 48, 9954–9957 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Koh, K., Wong-Foy, A. G. & Matzger, A. J. A porous coordination copolymer with over 5000 m2/g BET surface area. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 4184–4185 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Koh, K., Wong-Foy, A. G. & Matzger, A. J. Coordination copolymerization mediated by Zn4O(CO2R)6 metal clusters: a balancing act between statistics and geometry. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 15005–15010 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Furukawa, H. et al. Ultrahigh porosity in metal-organic frameworks. Science 329, 424–428 (2010).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Kondo, M. et al. Rational synthesis of stable channel-like cavities with methane gas adsorption properties: [{Cu2(pzdc)2(L)}n] (pzdc=pyrazine-2,3-dicarboxylate; L=a pillar ligand). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 38, 140–143 (1999).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Kitaura, R., Fujimoto, K., Noro, S., Kondo, M. & Kitagawa, S. A pillared-layer coordination polymer network displaying hysteretic sorption: [Cu2(pzdc)2(dpyg)] n (pzdc=pyrazine-2,3-dicarboxylate; dpyg=1,2-di(4-pyridyl)glycol). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 41, 133–135 (2002).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Maji, T. K., Uemura, K., Chang, H.- C., Matsuda, R. & Kitagawa, S. Expanding and shrinking porous modulation based on pillared-layer coordination polymers showing selective guest adsorption. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 43, 3269–3272 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Sakamoto, H. et al. Systematic construction of porous coordination pillared-layer structures and their sorption properties. Chem. Lett. 39, 218–219 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Seki, K. Design of an adsorbent with an ideal pore structure for methane adsorption using metal complexes. Chem. Commun. 1496–1497 (2001).

  43. Dybtsev, D. N., Chun, H. & Kim, K. Rigid and flexible: a highly porous metal-organic framework with unusual guest-dependent dynamic behavior. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 43, 5033–5036 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Chun, H., Dybtsev, D. N., Kim, H. & Kim, K. Synthesis, X-ray crystal structures, and gas sorption properties of pillared square grid nets based on paddle-wheel motifs: implications for hydrogen storage in porous materials. Chem. Eur. J. 11, 3521–3529 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Ma, B. Q., Mulfort, K. L. & Hupp, J. T. Microporous pillared paddle-wheel frameworks based on mixed-ligand coordination of zinc ions. Inorg. Chem. 44, 4912–4914 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Bureekaew, S. et al. Control of interpenetration for tuning structural flexibility influences sorption properties. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 49, 7660–7664 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Uemura, T. et al. Unveiling thermal transitions of polymers in subnanometre pores. Nat. Commun. 1, 83 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Zhang, Y. B., Zhang, W. X., Feng, F. Y., Zhang, J. P. & Chen, X. M. A highly connected porous coordination polymer with unusual channel structure and sorption properties. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 48, 5287–5290 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Jiang, G. et al. A nine-connected mixed-ligand nickel-organic framework and its gas sorption properties. Cryst. Growth Des. 11, 3713–3716 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. O'Keeffe, M., Peskov, M. A., Ramsden, S. J. & Yaghi, O. M. The reticular chemistry structure resource (RCSR) database of, and symbols for, crystal nets. Acc. Chem. Res. 41, 1782–1789 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Serre, C. et al. Role of solvent-host interactions that lead to very large swelling of hybrid frameworks. Science 315, 1828–1831 (2007).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Düren, T., Millange, F., Férey, G., Walton, K. S. & Snurr, R. Q. Calculating geometric surface areas as a characterization tool for metal-organic frameworks. J. Phys. Chem. C 111, 15350–15356 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Dinca, M. et al. Hydrogen storage in a microporous metal-organic framework with exposed Mn2+ coordination sites. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128, 16876–16883 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Chen, B. et al. Surface interactions and quantum kinetic molecular sieving for H2 and D2 adsorption on a mixed metalorganic framework material. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 6411–6423 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


This work was supported by the '973 Project' (2012CB821706) and NSFC (21121061 and 21001120).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



Y.B.Z., J.P.Z. and X.M.C. conceived and designed the experiments. Y.B.Z., H.L.Z. and C.Z. conducted synthetic experiments. Y.B.Z. performed the physical measurements and crystal-structure analyses. R.B.L. and J.B.L. performed sorption measurements. J.P.Z. analysed the data. Y.B.Z., J.P.Z. and X.M.C. wrote the manuscript. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jie-Peng Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Figures, Tables, Methods and References

Supplementary Figures S1-S71, Supplementary Tables S1-S5, Supplementary Methods and Supplementary References (PDF 3364 kb)

Supplementary Data 1

Crystallographic data for Ia, IIa, IIb, IIIa, IIIb, IIIc, IVa, IVb, IVc, Va, Vb, Vc, and Vd (CIF 208 kb)

Rights and permissions

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhang, YB., Zhou, HL., Lin, RB. et al. Geometry analysis and systematic synthesis of highly porous isoreticular frameworks with a unique topology. Nat Commun 3, 642 (2012).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing