Group additivity-Pourbaix diagrams advocate thermodynamically stable nanoscale clusters in aqueous environments


The characterization of water-based corrosion, geochemical, environmental and catalytic processes rely on the accurate depiction of stable phases in a water environment. The process is aided by Pourbaix diagrams, which map the equilibrium solid and solution phases under varying conditions of pH and electrochemical potential. Recently, metastable or possibly stable nanometric aqueous clusters have been proposed as intermediate species in non-classical nucleation processes. Herein, we describe a Group Additivity approach to obtain Pourbaix diagrams with full consideration of multimeric cluster speciation from computations. Comparisons with existing titration results from experiments yield excellent agreement. Applying this Group Additivity-Pourbaix approach to Group 13 elements, we arrive at a quantitative evaluation of cluster stability, as a function of pH and concentration, and present compelling support for not only metastable but also thermodynamically stable multimeric clusters in aqueous solutions.


Cluster formation in aqueous solutions have attracted renewed interest during the last decade1. Aqueous inorganic clusters are nanoscale molecular solvates composed of several metal ions linked via oxo and hydroxo ligands. They are crucial in a diverse range of chemical processes such as solution deposition of device thin films2, biomineralization3,4 and the natural cycling of minerals through soil, water and biomass5. Aqueous clusters are also known to be causative agents of neurodegenerative disease and image enhancement additives6. Recently, stable or metastable aqueous cluster formation have been suggested to play an important role in an alternative nucleation process as compared to classical nucleation theory (CNT)3,7,8,9. In this scenario, nucleation towards a solid bulk state proceeds via aggregation of solvated clusters, and not via a one-at-a-time attachment of monomeric species to a critical nucleus as assumed in CNT10. The occurrence of nanoscale aqueous clusters, in systems such as CaCO3 (refs 3, 7, 11, 12), AlPO4 (ref. 13), Ga (ref. 14), Fe (ref. 15) Fe oxyhydroxides (ref. 16), Hf/Zr (ref. 17) and Al (ref. 18) has been inferred from a variety of experimental visualization, speciation and spectroscopic observations. From the evidence, it is clear that these clusters (i) form through a reversible process3,19 whose speciation is governed by equilibria of molecular species in solution3 and (ii) are stable in solution for an extended time3,7,8. While the majority of published Pourbaix diagrams20,21,22 exhibit exclusively monomeric aqueous ion stability domains, growing thermochemical data on clusters is being incorporated into speciation and Pourbaix analyses. As examples, we note that stable multimeric species, beyond dimers and trimers, are suggested for Mo, W and V22 and for Bi20 at 0.1 M and high potential. On the other hand, known cluster-forming systems such as Al, Fe, Ga, Hf and so on, exhibit monomeric aqueous ion stability in these reference works. Hence, there are still many questions surrounding nanometric cluster formation in solution, for example, as to the structure, the stability, the concentration ranges, counter-ion effects and solvation structure as well as the role of clusters in the nucleation process23. Theory can provide a complementary means to elucidate some of these questions. For example, quantum mechanical (QM) studies of the structure, electronic and spectroscopic properties, absorption and reaction sites for clusters are well established24,25. Recently, molecular dynamics simulations have been used to unravel solute-solvent and ion-pairing interactions as well as the dynamics of specific clusters24,26,27.

In this work, we present two distinct theoretical procedures, which together provide an efficient and theoretically rigorous route towards obtaining Pourbaix diagrams with full consideration of cluster stability and speciation from first-principles. First, we reveal a group additivity (GA) method that can predict the Gibbs free energies of aqueous oxo/hydroxo metal clusters in excellent agreement with QM and experiments at a fraction of the cost. GA was developed by Benson in the 1950s to rapidly predict the thermodynamics of organic compounds28,29. No such analogous method exists for pure aqueous inorganic compounds. We demonstrate the methodology on group 13 metal clusters which have drawn considerable attention recently due to their importance in catalytic microporous solids30, green aqueous precursors for large-area metal oxide thin films2, water treatment18 as well as tumour diagnosis and possible treatment of malignancies31. Second, we use the resulting cluster free energies in the Pourbaix formalism of the Materials Project32 developed by us33. The most important aspect of this formalism is that it uses a combination of computed solid states and clusters with experimentally obtained Gibbs free energies for the monomeric aqueous ions and water, which means that effects such as aqueous ion solvation are inherently accounted for. By combining the GA method with this formalism, we build a foundation for robustly evaluating the thermodynamic stability of clusters against the competing solid phases and monomeric aqueous ions.


Group additivity method for cluster energy prediction

To demonstrate our approach and study the thermodynamic stability of clusters in aqueous solutions, we consider group 13 metal clusters; in particular, the Al and Ga systems. We emphasize that the monomeric aqueous species are single metal (M) aqueous ions, of the form [MOyHz]n+, whereas the clusters are polymeric metal hydrolysis products [MxOyHz]n+. In the case of Al, common monomeric species such as [Al(H2O)6]3+, [AlOH(H2O)5]2+ and [Al(OH)4]4− as well as larger hydrolysis products can be identified by 27Al-NMR as well as potentiometric studies34. Of the multimeric species, the dominant aluminium complex in aqueous systems is the large tridecamer [Al13O4(OH)24(H2O)12]7+, that is, ɛ-Keggin ion, found across a broad pH range depending on aluminium ion concentration.

The aqueous behaviour of Ga has significant similarities to Al. Like Al, Ga forms a few monomeric species, such as [Ga(H2O)6]3+, [GaOH(H2O)5]2+ and [Ga(OH)4]4− under different concentration and pH conditions. Ga also forms larger hydrolysis products14, primarily in the form of the Ga13 Keggin cluster, though other hydrolysis products have also been synthesized35.

To efficiently obtain the energy of a generic cluster, we present a GA method that predicts the thermodynamic stabilities of aqueous group 13 metal hydroxide and oxide clusters, regardless of size or structure. The method quantitatively reproduces first-principles computations in predicting hydrolysis reaction energies and stabilities of both homometallic and heterometallic group 13 clusters with mean absolute error of 3.0 kcal mol−1. These calculations take seconds, a fraction of the cost of computing the QM values. In this method, the Gibbs free energy of any given aqueous metal oxo/hydroxo cluster is expressed as the sum of the Gibbs free energies of the metal cations and the ligated oxo, hydroxo and aquo ligands. For instance, the absolute Gibbs free energy of Al dimer, [Al2(OH)2(H2O)8] is:

The general hydrolysis reaction can be written as the following equation, where {M, N} identify the group 13 metals and {m, n} denote the respective stoichiometries:

Through inspection of group 13 clusters structures that have either been discovered or conjectured to exist and their QM computed energies5,36, we identify seven unique ligands that form the basis for replicating any structure (Fig. 1). The Gibbs free energies of the seven basis cluster in Fig. 1 can be written as a set of coupled linear equations with the ligand energies as unknown variables. Using first-principles computed free energies37,38,39 for a set of clusters, the Gibbs free energies of the seven common ligands are fit.

Figure 1: The seven aqueous clusters used to compute ligand energies.

Seven metal aqueous oxo/hydroxo clusters were used to compute energies for the seven common ligands. The subscripts of μ denote the number of metal cations bound to each oxo/hydroxo ligand. Detailed information about the ligands are found in SI.

Validation of group additivity method

The regression plots comparing the GA predicted and QM computed hydrolysis energies are shown in Fig. 2. The linearity between the QM energy and GA predicted energy (R2=0.99) shows that the GA method accurately reproduces the QM computed hydrolysis reaction energies of Al, Ga and Al/Ga aqueous oxo/hydroxo clusters. The methodology, the ligand energies and the validation are described in more detail in the Supplementary Tables 1–3, Supplementary Figs 1,2 and Supplementary Notes 1,2.

Figure 2: GA predicted versus QM computed hydrolysis energies for Al and Ga.

(a) Al and (b) Ga energies. The slope of the linear regression line is near unity (0.98), the intercept is 2.10 and the R2 value is 0.99. Clusters whose error are larger than 5 kcal mol−1 are labelled. Al clusters are in cyan, Ga in magenta and heterometallic clusters in black.

The GA-Pourbaix formalism is able to quantitatively reproduce not only QM free energies, but also qualitatively the experimental free energies and speciation. To verify the accuracy, the equilibrium constant of the hydrolysis reaction leading to the Keggin aluminium or gallium tridecamer cluster was used to predict speciation. Specifically, the ratio of the monomer and Keggin concentrations was calculated with respect to pH and overall concentration of metal ions. As shown in Fig. 3, the equilibria predicted from the GA method robustly reproduce the reported experimental speciation behaviour of both γ-Ga and ɛ-Al Keggin ions.

Figure 3: Speciation diagrams as a function of pH and concentrations.

Equilibrium constants are deduced from experiments and the group additivity method. (a) Aluminum clusters. (b) Gallium clusters.

Pourbaix diagram for nanoscale clusters

To introduce the computed clusters to a rigorous thermodynamic framework which allows us to compare their stability with those of competing phases, for example, solids and monomeric aqueous ions, we adopt the Pourbaix formalism, as implemented in the Materials Project32. The formation energies for the different species (experimental aqueous ions and first-principles computed solids) are imported through a common reference state scheme allowing for a grand canonical convex hull of stable aqueous and solid species as a function of pH and hydrogen potential. The Pourbaix diagram is constructed by projecting the convex hull to the E-pH plane. This formalism has been benchmarked33 on almost all non-radioactive elements in the periodic table and reproduces or surpasses (due to its access to large amounts of computed solid polymorphs which have not been measured for their thermodynamic properties), the available experimental Pourbaix diagrams. Since launch in 2013, the Materials Project Pourbaix App has been used to successfully predict and interpret the stability of multiple materials and materials classes such as Mn2V2O7 (ref. 40), BiVO4 (ref. 41), MnNiO3 (ref. 42), Cu vanadates41, 2D materials for photocatalyst applications43 and CaCO3 (ref. 4), as a function of aqueous conditions. In this work we extend the framework by directly importing the cluster energies through equations similar to equation (1). The resulting values for are provided in Supplementary Table 4. We note that the Materials Project database contains not only the monomeric aqueous ions and stable solid state phases, but also many more metastable solids—against which the cluster Gibbs free energies are being evaluated, as a function of pH and potential32. To date, the Materials Project contains 106 unique Al–Ox–Hy, 41 Ga–Ox–Hy solid compounds and four Al as well as seven Ga monomeric aqueous ions. Furthermore, we emphasize that the aqueous species analyses do not include any counter-ion or salt effects in the aqueous solution.

Figure 4a,b show the two resulting GA-Pourbaix diagrams for aluminium which illustrates the evolution of stable species as a function of pH, standard hydrogen potential—at two representative cluster concentrations. Similar to the well-known experimental aluminium Pourbaix diagram20,21,44, for pH<3, the monomer Al3+ is stable in solution, while at high pH, the Al(OH)4 is preferred. Solid state Al2O3 is expected to precipitate at neutral conditions and at reducing potentials lower than 2.0 V versus standard hydrogen potential, metallic aluminium represents the equilibrium state in aqueous solutions. Existing experimental Pourbaix diagrams are dominated by solid and monomeric species20,21; however, in Fig. 4 we also observe that multimeric aqueous cluster species are predicted to be thermodynamic ground states at slightly acidic conditions. At low cluster concentration (10−8 M) we find the ɛ-Al Keggin (#15 in Supplementary Fig. 2) to be the most stable species between 3.5<pH<4.1, while a ‘dimer-Keggin’ cluster (Al2612+ in Fig. 4a) becomes stable at higher pH=4.1–5.2. This dimer-Keggin resembles a dimer ɛ-Keggin, but is actually a dimer of δ-Keggins. The δ-Keggin cluster differs from the ɛ-Keggin by a 60o rotation of one of the four trimeric groups around the exterior of the ɛ-Keggin cluster. At higher cluster concentrations (10−3 M) the dimer-Keggin outcompetes the ɛ-Keggin, and stabilizes between 3.3<pH<4.7. We note that larger oligomeric clusters are favoured at higher cluster concentrations, which suggests a route towards cluster aggregation and subsequent formation of a bulk Al oxide or hydroxide (for example, AlOOH or Al2O3)10. Indeed, the δ-Keggin form is known to polymerize leading to the formation of larger aluminium polycations, whereof Al30k, Al32k and possibly Al26k, as suggested here, are examples.

Figure 4: Pourbaix diagrams with nanoscale aqueous clusters.

The diagrams incorporate solid phases from first-principles, aqueous ions from experiments and clusters from the GA method. In total, 20 Al clusters are evaluated to produce (a and b) and 16 Ga clusters are evaluated to to produce (c and d). In (a) the respective concentrations are 10−8 M for both monomeric and cluster aluminium species and in (b) 10−2 M for monomeric species and 10−3 M for the aluminium cluster species. In (c and d), the respective concentrations are 10−2 M for monomeric species and 10−3 M for the gallium cluster species. In (c) all phases are included whereas in (d) we simulate a situation where Ga2O3 is kinetically inhibited to nucleate which shows the stability regime of the Ga13 Keggin. The concentrations for (ad) refer to the metal ion and corresponds to the solubility of the stable species at the phase boundary. Hence the concentrations should be treated as a lower limit of solubility at the given potential and pH.

Interestingly, for gallium, we find that while the Keggin Ga13k shows the expected stability regime and speciation with respect to the monomeric Ga3+ ions (Fig. 3), in the full Pourbaix diagram it is outcompeted by other species, primarily the solid Ga2O3 by 166 meV per Ga at a representative pH=3.0, and 0.001 M cluster concentration. Hence, at regular concentrations, the gallium Pourbaix diagram—including the clusters—is exactly the same as the traditional one20,21,44 without any included cluster energies (Fig. 4c). However, by removing the stable phases from the construction of the Pourbaix hull, we simulate scenarios where specific phases are unable to form. For example, if Ga2O3 nucleation and growth is inhibited, the Ga13k cluster emerges as the most stable phase for 2.4<pH<10.4 (Fig. 4d). At lower pH, the monomeric aqueous ion Ga3+ is stable, while for pH>=10.4, first, the HGa(OH)32− and then GaO33− form at successively more basic conditions (pH>11.8).


The two complementary techniques presented in this work provide a robust and efficient framework for calculating the Gibbs free energy and evaluating the thermodynamic stability of clusters in controlled aqueous solutions. For Al, the resulting GA-Pourbaix diagrams advocate the existence of stable nanoscale clusters in aqueous solution which adds pertinent information to the current discussion on non-classical nucleation models3,7,8. Figure 4 shows an intuitive succession of the ɛ-Keggin ion to dimerization of a similar structure (δ-Keggin) as the concentrations of the clusters as well as the monomeric ions are increased. Furthermore, we note that the Al clusters are stabilized without any counter-ion or salt effects, which may be indirectly supported by the variety of different solutions in which Al Keggin clusters have been observed45,46,47,48.

For gallium we find that the Ga13 Keggin successfully competes with the Ga3+ monomeric aqueous ion, as the computed speciation diagram reproduces experimental trends (Fig. 3b). However, in the full GA-Pourbaix diagram, other species such as the aqueous ion Ga(OH)2+ and the solid Ga2O3 phase are thermodynamically more stable for the pH range where the Ga clusters may emerge. Hence, the dilute GA-Pourbaix diagram—including cluster energies from 16 Ga clusters—is the same as the traditional experimental Pourbaix diagram20,21,44. However, simulating the stability of species under conditions where, for example, we assume Ga2O3 nucleation to be kinetically hindered, we obtain the GA-Pourbaix diagram in Fig. 4d, where the Ga13k Keggin stability regime is evident.

The combined results of the aluminium and gallium GA-Pourbaix diagrams prompt us to the following comments. First of all, it is important to note that the results displayed in Fig. 4 assume non-interacting, dilute conditions and do not include any counter-ion effects, which are expected to selectively influence the stability of different clusters. Al Keggin clusters are clearly thermodynamically stable even under these conditions, while Ga clusters may be dependent on salt effects to outcompete the stable phases in the GA-Pourbaix diagram. For example, we stress that the energy difference between the Ga13k and Ga2O3 as well as monomeric aqueous specie Ga(OH)2+ is 166 and 72 meV per Ga; respectively, which is within the energy of counter-ion interactions. In general, analysing the free energy difference between competing clusters as well as other possible species opens up the possibility to rationally influence cluster stability by tuning the solution composition. For example, the ‘flat’ Al13 cluster is predicted to be thermodynamically unstable with respect to the ɛ-Keggin by 30 meV per Al. However, this cluster has been synthesized and observed under several different conditions5,49. In addition, the intermediates that have been suggested to give rise to the ‘flat’ Al13 cluster are not stable from these QM or GA calculations5. We speculate that there are many more metastable clusters that may be stabilized by strong salt association and ion-pairing in solution. Available experimental results also suggest that different cluster structures, that may or may not be related to the macroscopic bulk5,50, form under different aqueous conditions. In particular, nanoscale clusters exhibiting building units resembling metastable bulk materials may pre-condition the synthesis of target nanoparticles5,11, thin films2 and bulk materials with select structure and functionality18.

Finally, we would also like to emphasize that no kinetic effects are included, which are known to be important in many of the observed nucleation processes, and for determining the specific condition-dependent mechanism by which the final crystal and its morphology is formed. Nevertheless, the presented results provide a rigorous thermodynamic framework for the analysis of stable species in solution against which comparison and interpretation of experimental results can be made.

A general predictive computational framework to predict the vast array of aqueous metal clusters found in natural ecosystems, technological applications and biology is a long-standing challenge. In this work, we present the results of combining two procedures to improve our ability to predict and interpret cluster formation in aqueous solutions. First, we disclose a general robust GA method to calculate the free energy of inorganic clusters, which reproduces experimental equilibrium constants and speciation, rival the accuracy of quantum mechanically computed values, and—once developed for a particular chemical system—can be performed in seconds. The speciation diagrams comparing GA, quantum mechanics and experimental results show that the GA method is a general, accurate and expedient method to predict the stabilities of group 13 metal aqua-oxo/hydroxo clusters. Furthermore, we import the resulting cluster thermodynamic data into the Materials Project Pourbaix framework, which provides a hybrid approach to classical Pourbaix diagrams—allowing for computed and experimental species to be evaluated within a single-reference state system. The result supports the emerging experimental evidences3,7,8,9,12,18 of thermodynamically stable and mildly metastable solvated clusters, which may form as part of pre-nucleation pathways in non-CNT10. In the case of Al, we find that the ɛ-Keggin and ‘dimer’ δ-Keggin outcompetes monomeric aqueous species at mildly acidic conditions and low cluster concentrations, whereas higher concentrations favour the dimer-Keggin alone. In the case of Ga, we find no cluster species to be more stable than the monomeric ions and the bulk Ga2O3 solid under dilute, salt-free water conditions. However, the Keggin Ga13 cluster is found to be more stable than the monomeric Ga3+ under mildly acid conditions and between 2.4<pH<10.4 is the second most stable species, after bulk Ga2O3. We emphasize that the current framework does not include interactions with other species in solution, such as counter-ions, which are likely to provide an excellent tuning parameter to change the hierarchy of stable clusters and promote nucleation of metastable structures. We also stress that kinetic factors and the actual atomistic path towards nucleation, including structural rearrangement of cluster collectives, are beyond the current analysis. Nevertheless, this GA-Pourbaix methodology will contribute towards improved understanding on nucleation by providing a quantitative framework to aid analysis and ultimately guide rational synthesis of metastable clusters and structures in solution.


Quantum mechanical method for group additivity

The ground-state structures and Gibbs free energies are computed by HF/6-31G(d,p) with the IEFPCM-UFF continuum solvation model for water. The electronic energy was refined using the B3LYP/6-311+G(d) single point, and the solvation energy was recomputed using HF/6-311+G(d) with CPCM-UAKS for water.

Pourbaix diagram formalism

To integrate the GA free energies into the Persson Pourbaix formalism we express the clusters formation with respect to the monomeric aqueous ions:

The corresponding free energy of cluster hydrolysis is then obtained by:

where , 0, , and are the chemical potentials of the cluster, protons, metal ions and H2O, respectively. All energies are provided at the standard state, and conform the consistent reference framework by Persson et al.29 , and are known properties, while is calculated by the GA method presented here. Hence, is obtained from equation (4):

Code availability

The code to plot Pourbaix diagram is available via

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available within the paper and its supplementary information file.

Additional information

How to cite this article: Wills, L. A. et al. Group additivity-Pourbaix diagrams advocate thermodynamically stable nanoscale clusters in aqueous environments. Nat. Commun. 8, 15852 doi: 10.1038/ncomms15852 (2017).

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.


  1. 1

    Hanrahan, G. in Modelling of Pollutants in Complex Environmental Systems Vol. 2, Advanced Topics in Environmental Science ILM Publications (2010).

  2. 2

    Meyers, S. T. et al. Solution-processed aluminum oxide phosphate thin-film dielectrics. Chem. Mater. 19, 4023–4029 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Gebauer, D., Volkel, A. & Colfen, H. Stable prenucleation calcium carbonate clusters. Science 322, 1819–1822 (2008).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Sun, W., Jayaraman, S., Chen, W., Persson, K. A. & Ceder, G. Nucleation of metastable aragonite CaCO3 in seawater. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 3199–3204 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Wang, W. et al. Electrolytic synthesis of aqueous aluminum nanoclusters and in situ characterization by femtosecond raman spectroscopy and computations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 18397–18401 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Yokel, R. A. Brain uptake, retention, and efflux of aluminum and manganese. Environ. Health Perspect. 110, 699–704 (2002).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Nielsen, M. H., Aloni, S. & De Yoreo, J. J. In situ TEM imaging Of CaCO3 nucleation reveals coexistence of direct and indirect pathways. Science 345, 1158–1162 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Pouget, E. M. et al. The initial stages of template-controlled CaCO3 formation revealed by cryo-TEM. Science 323, 1455–1458 (2009).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Navrotsky, A. Energetic clues to pathways to biomineralization: precursors, clusters, and nanoparticles. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 12096–12101 (2004).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Gebauer, D., Kellermeier, M., Gale, J. D., Bergström, L. & Cölfen, H. Pre-nucleation clusters as solute precursors in crystallisation. Chem. Soc. Rev. 43, 2348 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Nielsen, M. H. et al. Investigating processes of nanocrystal formation and transformation via liquid cell TEM. Microsc. Microanal. 20, 425–436 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Habraken, W. J. E. M. et al. Ion-association complexes unite classical and non-classical theories for the biomimetic nucleation of calcium phosphate. Nat. Commun. 4, 1507 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Grandjean, D., Beale, A. M., Petukhov, A. V. & Weckhuysen, B. M. Unraveling the crystallization mechanism of CoAPO-5 molecular sieves under hydrothermal conditions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 14454–14465 (2005).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Bradley, S. M., Kydd, R. A. & Yamdagni, R. Detection of a new polymeric species formed through the hydrolysis of gallium(III) salt solutions. J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. 1989, 413 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Sadeghi, O., Zakharov, L. N. & Nyman, M. Aqueous formation and manipulation of the iron-oxo Keggin ion. Science 347, 1359–1362 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Legg, B. A., Zhu, M., Comolli, L. R., Gilbert, B. & Banfield, J. F. Determination of the three-dimensional structure of ferrihydrite nanoparticle aggregates. Langmuir 30, 9931–9940 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Chiavacci, L. A., Santilli, C. V., Pulcinelli, S. H., Bourgaux, C. & Briois, V. Role of the surface state and structural feature in the thermoreversible sol–gel transition of a zirconyl aqueous precursor modified by sulfuric acid. Chem. Mater. 16, 3995–4004 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Stewart, T. A. et al. Enhanced water purification: a single atom makes a difference. Environ. Sci. Technol. 43, 5416–5422 (2009).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Baumgartner, J. et al. Nucleation and growth of magnetite from solution. Nat. Mater. 12, 310–314 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Brookins, D. G. Eh-pH Diagrams for Geochemistry Springer-Verlag (1988).

  21. 21

    Takeno, N. Atlas of Eh-pH Diagrams. Intercomparison of Thermodynamic Databases. Geological Survey of Japan Open File Report No. 419. (National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology Research Center for Deep Geological Environments, 2005).

  22. 22

    Schweitzer, G. K. & Pesterfield, L. L. The Aqueous Chemistry of the Elements Oxford University Press (2010).

  23. 23

    Lee, J., Yang, J., Kwon, S. G. & Hyeon, T. Nonclassical nucleation and growth of inorganic nanoparticles. Nat. Rev. Mater. 1, 16034 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Casey, W. H. & Rustad, J. R. Reaction dynamics, molecular clusters, and aqueous geochemistry. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 35, 21–46 (2007).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Tiferet, E. et al. The energy landscape of uranyl-peroxide species. Chem. Eur. J 20, 3646–3651 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    López, X., Nieto-Draghi, C., Bo, C., Avalos, J. B. & Poblet, J. M. Polyoxometalates in solution: molecular dynamics simulations on the α-PW12O403− Keggin anion in aqueous media. J. Phys. Chem. A 109, 1216–1222 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Cameron, J. M. et al. Investigating the transformations of polyoxoanions using mass spectrometry and molecular dynamics. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 8765–8773 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Benson, S. W. & Buss, J. H. Additivity rules for the estimation of molecular properties. thermodynamic properties. J. Chem. Phys. 29, 546 (1958).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Benson, S. W. et al. Additivity rules for the estimation of thermochemical properties. Chem. Rev. 69, 279–324 (1969).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30

    Vicente, M. A., Belver, C., Sychev, M., Prihod’ko, R. & Gil, A. Relationship between the surface properties and the catalytic performance of Al-, Ga-, and AlGa-pillared saponites. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 48, 406–414 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31

    Jakupec, M. A. & Keppler, B. K. Gallium in cancer treatment. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 4, 1575–1583 (2004).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32

    Jain, A. et al. Commentary: the materials project: a materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation. APL Mater. 1, 11002 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33

    Persson, K. A., Waldwick, B., Lazic, P. & Ceder, G. Prediction Of solid-aqueous equilibria: scheme to combine first-principles calculations of solids with experimental aqueous states. Phys. Rev. B 85, 235438 (2012).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34

    Öhman, L.-O., Forsling, W., Songstad, J., Sjöblom, J. & Thylin, B. Equilibrium and structural studies of silicon(IV) and aluminium(III) in aqueous solution. 3. Potentiometric study of aluminium(III) hydrolysis and aluminium(III) hydroxo carbonates in 0.6 M NaCl. Acta Chem. Scand. 35a, 795–802 (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35

    Mensinger, Z. L. et al. Synthesis of heterometallic group 13 nanoclusters and inks for oxide thin-film transistors. Angew. Chemie Int. Ed. 47, 9484–9486 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36

    Mensinger, Z. L., Wang, W., Keszler, D. A. & Johnson, D. W. Oligomeric group 13 hydroxide compounds—a rare but varied class of molecules. Chem. Soc. Rev. 41, 1019–1030 (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37

    Frisch, M. J. et al. Gaussian 09 (Gaussian, Inc., Wallingford CT, 2009).

  38. 38

    Stephens, P. J., Devlin, F. J., Chabalowski, C. F. & Frisch, M. J. Ab initio calculation of vibrational absorption and circular dichroism spectra using density functional force fields. J. Phys. Chem. 98, 11623–11627 (1994).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39

    Tomasi, J., Mennucci, B. & Cancès, E. The IEF version of the PCM solvation method: an overview of a new method addressed to study molecular solutes at the QM ab initio level. J. Mol. Struct. THEOCHEM 464, 211–226 (1999).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40

    Yan, Q. et al. Mn2V2O7: an earth abundant light absorber for solar water splitting. Adv. Energy Mater. 5, 1401840 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41

    Toma, F. M. et al. Mechanistic insights into chemical and photochemical transformations of bismuth vanadate photoanodes. Nat. Commun. 7, 12012 (2016).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. 42

    Yu, J. et al. First-principles study of electronic structure and photocatalytic properties of MnNiO3 as an alkaline oxygen-evolution photocatalyst. Chem. Commun. 51, 2867–2870 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43

    Singh, A. K., Mathew, K., Zhuang, H. L. & Hennig, R. G. Computational screening of 2D materials for photocatalysis. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 6, 1087–1098 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. 44

    Pourbaix, M. Atlas Of Electrochemical Equilibria In Aqueous Solutions National Association of Corrosion Engineers (1974).

  45. 45

    Johansson, G., Gullman, L.-O., Kjekshus, A. & Söderquist, R. On the crystal structure of some basic aluminium salts. Acta Chem. Scand. 14, 771–773 (1960).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46

    Fu, G., Nazar, L. F. & Bain, A. D. Aging processes of alumina sol-gels: characterization of new aluminum polyoxycations by aluminum-27 NMR spectroscopy. Chem. Mater. 3, 602–610 (1991).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47

    Armstrong, C. R., Casey, W. H. & Navrotsky, A. Energetics Of Al Keggin cluster compounds. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 14775–14779 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. 48

    Drljaca, A., Hardie, M. J. & Raston, C. L. Selective isolation of Keggin ions using self-assembled superanion capsules. J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans 3639–3642 (1999).

  49. 49

    Wang, W., Wentz, K. M., Hayes, S. E., Johnson, D. W. & Keszler, D. A. Synthesis of the hydroxide cluster [Al13(μ3-OH)6(μ-OH)18(H2O)24]15+ from an aqueous solution. Inorg. Chem. 50, 4683–4685 (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. 50

    Casey, W. H., Olmstead, M. M. & Phillips, B. L. A new aluminum hydroxide octamer, [Al8(OH)14(H2O)18](SO4)5·16H2O. Inorg. Chem. 44, 4888–4890 (2005).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


P.H.-Y.C. is the Bert and Emelyn Christensen Professor of Chemistry at Oregon State University and gratefully acknowledges financial support from the Vicki & Patrick F. Stone Family and the National Science Foundation (NSF, CHE-1352663). L.A.W. acknowledges financial support from OSU Hedberg Fellowship. All authors acknowledge financial support and computing infrastructure in part provided by the NSF Phase-2 CCI, Center for Sustainable Materials Chemistry (NSF CHE-1102637).

Author information




L.A.W. and P.H.-Y.C. developed the group addivity method. L.A.W. performed the quantum mechanical calculations. X.Q. and K.A.P. developed the formalism to integrate Pourbaix diagram with clusters. X.Q. implemented the code base and plotted the diagram. K.A.P., L.A.W., X.Q. and P.H.-Y.C. wrote the final manuscript. All authors participated in the final version of the article.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Douglas A. Keszler or Kristin A. Persson or Paul Ha-Yeon Cheong.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wills, L., Qu, X., Chang, I. et al. Group additivity-Pourbaix diagrams advocate thermodynamically stable nanoscale clusters in aqueous environments. Nat Commun 8, 15852 (2017).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter for a daily update on COVID-19 science.
Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing