Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Oligolysine-based coating protects DNA nanostructures from low-salt denaturation and nuclease degradation


DNA nanostructures have evoked great interest as potential therapeutics and diagnostics due to ease and robustness of programming their shapes, site-specific functionalizations and responsive behaviours. However, their utility in biological fluids can be compromised through denaturation induced by physiological salt concentrations and degradation mediated by nucleases. Here we demonstrate that DNA nanostructures coated by oligolysines to 0.5:1 N:P (ratio of nitrogen in lysine to phosphorus in DNA), are stable in low salt and up to tenfold more resistant to DNase I digestion than when uncoated. Higher N:P ratios can lead to aggregation, but this can be circumvented by coating instead with an oligolysine-PEG copolymer, enabling up to a 1,000-fold protection against digestion by serum nucleases. Oligolysine-PEG-stabilized DNA nanostructures survive uptake into endosomal compartments and, in a mouse model, exhibit a modest increase in pharmacokinetic bioavailability. Thus, oligolysine-PEG is a one-step, structure-independent approach that provides low-cost and effective protection of DNA nanostructures for in vivo applications.


DNA nanostructures (DNs) can be programmed to fold into prescribed spatial configurations1,2,3,4,5,6, functionalized site specifically with a wide variety of guests7 and engineered to undergo allosteric conformational changes8,9,10,11. For application to diagnostics and therapeutics, DNs can impart these useful properties, such as controlled shape, addressability and responsiveness, to other nanomaterials—for example, liposomes, polymeric or metallic particles, proteins—and thereby augment their functionality. Furthermore, DNs are biodegradable and biocompatible.

However, current biomedical applications of DNs are hindered by two main challenges. First, stabilization of most DNs requires 5–20 mM divalent cations (for example, Mg2+) to overcome electrostatic repulsion between closely packed DNA phosphate anions. Therefore, most DNs exhibit poor structural integrity in physiological fluids, which typically contain low levels of Mg2+ and Ca2+ (for example, 0.4 mM each in RPMI-1640)12. Second, nuclease activity results in rapid degradation during incubation of these structures in freshly prepared cell medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) at 37 °C13,14,15,16. Intravenous injection of a fluorescently labelled DN results in rapid clearance similar to that of a control oligonucleotide17. Thus, DNs must first be stabilized against Mg2+ depletion and nuclease degradation before they can be effective for most biomedical applications.

Several approaches have been investigated to address these challenges. Cassinelli et al.17 have demonstrated the use of click chemistry to catenate constituent tiles of six helix tubes, which renders these structures stable at low ionic strength; Benson et al.18 and Veneziano et al.19 have reported wireframe architectures for DNA origami that survive at physiological divalent cation concentrations. Coating of DNs with cowpea chlorotic mottle virus capsid proteins20 or with cationic poly(2-dimethylamino-ethylmethacrylate) (PDMAEMA)-based polymers21 has been reported; however, this coating appeared to induce aggregation of DNs as monitored by negative-stain transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Our group has previously reported virus-inspired encapsulation of DN in liposomes, which protects the structure from nuclease degradation and enhances in vivo circulation time22. However, this method requires attaching multiple lipid–DNA conjugates on DNs at defined positions and extensive protocol optimization to template bilayer self-assembly without aggregation or multimerizaton, which makes the process time consuming. Although successful in addressing individual challenges, each of these methods hence remain labour/cost intensive or are structure dependent. A need therefore remains for an easy, scalable and structure-independent method to stabilize DNs against commonly encountered in vivo threats.

We report here that coating DNs with oligolysine provides stability against denaturation at physiological Mg2+ concentrations without noticeable distortion or aggregation of the structure (as monitored by negative-stain TEM). Coating is driven by electrostatic interactions and is achieved simply by mixing stock solutions of DNs and oligolysine at appropriate stoichiometric ratios followed by incubation at room temperature. However, coating with oligolysine only modestly protects DNs against nucleases. Refining our approach, we show that coating with oligolysine conjugated to polyethylene glycol (PEG) significantly slows down nuclease degradation. Furthermore, we use a fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET)-based assay to demonstrate structural integrity of the coated nanostructures within cellular compartments.


Stabilization of DNs against low-salt denaturation

We hypothesized that electrostatic repulsions in DNs due to Mg2+ depletion could be stabilized by using polyamines as a substitute for divalent cations (schematic with oligolysines as stabilizing agent shown in Fig. 1), as they would remain bound after dilution into physiological buffers (for example, see Supplementary Table 1 for RPMI-1640 composition), due to their much stronger binding. However, polyamines are known to condense DNA into compact nanoparticles; therefore, one concern is that polyamine binding could crush or deform DNs and thereby compromise their intricate three-dimensional shapes important for their functionality. A second concern is that polyamine binding could lead to aggregation of DNs.

Figure 1: Protection of DNs from low salt and nucleases.

The schematic represents the fate of bare and coated DNs in physiological buffers at 37 °C containing low salt and/or 10% FBS. Bare DN rapidly denatures at low salt and degrades in freshly prepared cell medium containing 10% FBS. Low-salt-induced denaturation and nuclease degradation can be overcome by coating the DNs with positively charged peptides such as K10 or K10–PEG5K at an N:P of 0.5:1 and 1:1, respectively. The oligolysine peptide has α-lysine side chains.

We first evaluated the structural integrity at low Mg2+ of a model DN that has the shape of a barrel (DN1 in Fig. 2) using a set of various polyamines: spermidine, spermine, oligoarginines of length 6, oligolysines of length 6 and 10 kDa branched polyethyleneimine (PEI). All the polyamines are positively charged at physiological pH and have the ability to interact with DNA electrostatically (Supplementary Fig. 1). Coating of DN1 was achieved by mixing DN1 with a solution of the polyamine at the desired N:P ratio (nitrogen in amines to phosphorus in DNA) and incubating at room temperature for 30 min. To assess the structural integrity of DN1 in physiological buffers, bare and polyamine-coated DN1 were diluted in standard RPMI medium (133 mM Na+, 5.3 mM K+, 0.4 mM Mg2+ and 0.4 mM Ca2+) such that the final Mg2+ concentration was 0.6 mM. The solution was then heated at 37 °C for 1 h in a thermal cycler and then analysed using agarose gel electrophoresis (AGE) and TEM.

Figure 2: Low-magnesium stability of bare and coated DNs.

(a) Negative-stain TEM images of bare DNs DN1–DN8 in folding buffer (5 mM Tris, 1 mM EDTA, 6–18 mM Mg2+). Negative-stain TEM images of (b) bare DN1–DN8, (c) K10-coated DN1–DN8, (d) K10–PEG5K-coated DN1–DN8 diluted in physiological buffer (RPMI-1640) such that the final Mg2+ concentration is 0.6 mM. All scale bars are 100 nm, except for DN7 (200 nm).

Analysis of the bare DN1 at physiological levels of Mg2+ ions revealed that its structure was destroyed beyond recognition (assessed via TEM, Fig. 2) and with dissociation of staple strands from the scaffold strand (assessed via AGE, Supplementary Fig. 2). Structural integrity at low salt could be preserved by prior incubation with spermine and spermidine, but only at N:P ratios of 50:1 and 100:1, respectively. However, these samples denatured after overnight dialysis at room temperature into zero-Mg2+ buffer (5 mM Tris, 1 mM EDTA pH 8.0), presumably due to dissociation of the polyamines into the free solution. This result encouraged us to try longer polyamines to obtain stronger binding and therefore longer residence times, as well as better control over bound N:P ratios. Pre-incubation of DN1 with PEI led to destruction of structural integrity due to compaction as observed by TEM, likely to be caused by strong multivalent binding (Supplementary Figs 2 and 3). In contrast, pre-incubation with oligoarginines protected against low-salt denaturation, however, at the cost of significant structural deformation (that is, barrel projection takes the appearance of a polygon instead of a circle (Supplementary Fig. 3).

We obtained the best results by far with oligolysine-coated DN1, which withstood divalent cation depletion at 37 °C and maintained structural integrity as observed via TEM. Different lengths of oligolysines Kn (where n is the number of L-lysine monomers; n=4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16 and 20) were investigated (Supplementary Figs 4–6). We observed that shorter oligolysines (n<10) required high N:P ratio for stabilization of DNs, owing to their weaker binding. Longer oligolysines (n>10), on the other hand, were required in only sub-stoichiometric amounts for stabilization due to enhanced binding, however, at the cost of increased aggregation of DNs. The best results were observed for K10, where the preservation of structure could be achieved at an N:P ratio of 0.5:1. Some aggregates were observed by TEM and AGE, but most of these separated after the sample was diluted to 1 nM in RPMI-1640 and incubated at 37 °C for 1 h.

The stability induced by K10 at low divalent-cation concentration was further tested with other DN designs (labelled DN2–DN8; Fig. 2). These nanostructures were chosen as a representative set to highlight the generality of the approach against variations in structural features such as curvature, the presence of a cavity, charge density, crossover density and size (AGE and TEM analysis in Supplementary Figs 7 and 8). The unstabilized DNs required 6–18 mM Mg2+ to maintain their intact structures. In all the cases, upon dilution in standard RPMI medium, the bare structure denatured to scaffold and staple strands, as observed via AGE and TEM. In contrast, DNs coated with K10 were able to maintain complete structural integrity even after overnight dialysis into zero-Mg2+ buffer (5 mM Tris, 1 mM EDTA pH 8.0; Supplementary Figs 9–13).

Stability of DNs against nuclease degradation

Encouraged by our results towards Mg2+ depletion, we moved on to tackle the second main challenge, which was to prevent rapid nuclease degradation of DNs in serum. Previous studies have reported that positively charged polyamines can condense DNA into nanoparticles that are protected from digestion by nucleases, a behaviour that has been exploited extensively in gene-delivery applications23. Therefore, we next investigated whether K10 coating protects DNs from nuclease digestion, despite not crushing them into condensed particles. For this and subsequent experiments, we focused on DN1 as a model system; we selected DN1 as a challenging test case for nuclease resistance, as it has very high surface area to mass ratio.

To assess the kinetics of nuclease digestion, the bare and K10 (N:P=0.5:1)-coated DN1 were incubated in RPMI supplemented with 10% FBS at 37 °C for different time points. After incubation, the samples were analysed by AGE and TEM, and compared with a control incubated in RPMI+10 mM Mg2+, but lacking FBS. Bare DN1 reached 50% degradation by 5 min in standard RPMI buffer, whereas it did not reach 50% degradation until 55 min in RPMI supplemented with 10 mM Mg2+. Likewise, K10-coated DN1 (N:P=0.5:1) did not reach 50% degradation until 50 min. Therefore, the K10 treatment protects DN1 to the same degree (5–10-fold enhanced resistance to nuclease degradation) as Mg2+ (Fig. 3). We hypothesize this is primarily due to the preservation of overall structure, and that low-salt denatured structures are better substrates for serum nucleases, perhaps due to their more open and accessible configurations (Supplementary Figs 14–17).

Figure 3: Time course of nuclease degradation of bare and coated DN1.

Digestion was assayed in freshly prepared cell medium (RPMI-1640 containing 10% FBS) at 37 °C. (a) Normalized agarose gel intensity vs. time for bare, K10 coated and K10–PEG5K-coated DN1. Time (hours) is plotted with log2 scaling and error bars represent s.d. (n=3 s). Agarose gel and negative-stain TEM images at 0 h and 24 h for (b) bare DN1, (c) K10-coated DN1 and (d) K10–PEG5K-coated DN1 incubated in freshly prepared primary BMDC medium at 37 °C. Scale bars, 100 nm.

Seeking further improved resistance against nuclease digestion, we explored the use of a K10–PEGnK co-polymer where the amino terminus of K10 was covalently functionalized with either a 1, 5 or 20 K PEGn (n=1, 5 and 20 K). PEGylation of K10 was chosen because previous studies have reported an improvement in stability and increase in vivo circulation times post PEGylation of nanoparticles24. Furthermore, PEGylation might discourage aggregation of particles and therefore enable the use of higher N:P ratios that otherwise would lead to such aggregation yet might provide greater nuclease resistance. Coating of DN1 with K10–PEGnK was performed using the same protocol as described above for K10, but with a N:P ratio of 1:1.

K10–PEGnK-coated DN1 was imaged via TEM, to ensure that the dense coating of K10–PEGnK did not compromise structural integrity in low-salt physiological buffers. TEM images showed that DN1 coated with K10–PEG5K or 20K at a N:P ratio of 1:1 were intact and displayed no visible difference when compared with the bare nanostructures (Supplementary Fig. 18). In contrast, DN1 coated with K10–PEG1K at a N:P ratio of 1:1 were extensively aggregated (Supplementary Fig. 18). The K10–PEGnK-coated DNs are neutral at a N:P ratio of 1:1 and hence are retained in the well during AGE. Before AGE, any K10–PEGnK coating can be removed if desired by incubating the sample with chondroitin sulfate, a negatively charged sulfated glycosaminoglycan, which electrostatically sequesters the positively charged K10–PEGnK and allows the DNs to penetrate the gel matrix (Supplementary Fig. 9).

To assess whether these PEGylated oligolysine coatings would provide greater resistance against nuclease degradation, we incubated the K10–PEG5K or 20K-coated DN1 (1 nM) in RPMI supplemented with 10% FBS at 37 °C for different time points. Before AGE, nucleases can be deactivated using 5 mM EGTA and 10% β-mercaptoethanol25 (Supplementary Fig. 19), and subsequently oligolysine shell can be removed by incubation with chondroitin sulfate to enable AGE analysis. Strikingly, AGE and TEM analysis showed that K10–PEG5K-coated DN1 reached 50% degradation in 36 h compared with only 5 min for the bare DN1, corresponding to a 800 × enhancement in resistance to nuclease degradation (Fig. 3). K10–PEG20K-coated DN1, on the other hand, showed almost comparable nuclease protection (50% degradation at 24 h) compared with K10–PEG5K-coated DN1 (Supplementary Fig. 20).

We also performed a DNase I titration assay, where bare and K10–PEG5K-coated DN1 (1 nM) were incubated with increasing amounts of DNase I in standard RPMI medium for 1 h at 37 °C. Bare DN1 was 50% degraded in 0.5 U ml−1 of DNase I, as observed by AGE. In contrast, K10–PEG5K-coated DN1 did not show significant degradation even in 500 U ml−1 of DNase I as observed by AGE and TEM, corresponding to a 1,000-fold increase in nuclease resistance (Supplementary Figs 21 and 22).

DNs such as DN9 (mesh helix19; Supplementary Fig. 23), constructed using a polyhedral mesh architecture, are intact in low-salt buffers due to the low incidence of adjacent double helices and therefore exhibit greater nuclease resistance at low salt compared with multilayer DNs such as DN1 (ref. 19). We also found that even DN9 exhibit fivefold greater nuclease resistance when coated with K10–PEG5K (Supplementary Fig. 24). This result suggests that the nuclease resistance offered by K10–PEG5K is not only due to the preservation of structural integrity of DNs in low-salt buffers, but also due in part to other factors such as steric shielding provided by the PEG layer that may reduce binding of nucleases to the DNA.

Accessibility of surface receptors in K10–PEG5K-coated DNs

Next we addressed whether K10–PEG5K coating of DNs blocks addressable surface features from functionalization (the attachment of 5K PEG at a N:P of 1:1 increases the thickness of the nanostructure by 2.4±1.3 nm as measured by dynamic light scattering); as a proxy, we assayed the ability of single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) handles protruding of the surface of DNs to interact with ssDNA anti-handles in solution. For this purpose, we incorporated 12 inward-facing 21mer ssDNA handles on the inside of DN1, to be bound by Alexa-750-labelled DNA anti-handles recruited from bulk solution (Supplementary Figs 25 and 26). We incubated DN1 containing the ssDNA handles, bare versus K10-coated versus K10–PEG5K-coated, with Alexa-750-labelled DNA anti-handle for 2 h at 37 °C and monitored the incorporation of the Alexa 750 fluorophore into DN1 using AGE. We observed that the incorporation efficiency of Alexa 750 was almost identical in all the three cases, implying that K10–PEG5K coating of DNs allows accessibility to surface decorations.

To further demonstrate that targeting by receptors positioned on DNs is not inhibited by the K10–PEG5K coating, we positioned 72 αvβ3-integrin-specific cyclic arginine-glycine-aspartate26 ligands strategically on the surface of DN6. We coated DN6 with K10–PEG5K and monitored cellular uptake into human umbilical vein endothelial cells by flow cytometry analysis. Our data shows that we are able to target surface integrin receptors on the cells and modestly enhance cellular uptake (Supplementary Fig. 27).

Cellular uptake of K10–PEG5K-coated DN1 into BMDCs

Thus far, we had demonstrated that coating of DNs with K10–PEG5K at an N:P ratio of 1:1 stabilizes them against Mg2+ depletion and nuclease degradation. Towards cellular and downstream in vivo applications, we next investigated whether K10–PEG5K coating is non-toxic and allows cellular uptake of DNs. For the subsequent experiments, we designated uncoated DN1 as DN1bare and K10–PEG5K-coated DN1 as DN1coated.

We chose to observe the cellular uptake of DN1bare and DN1coated into mouse primary bone marrow-derived dendritic cells (BMDCs). BMDCs provide a challenging test case, as they have been reported to degrade endocytosed DNA with great efficiency27. We incorporated either 18 Cy5 or 18 Cy3 fluorophores into the inner DNA helices of DN1. The fluorophore-labelled DN1 was incubated with BMDCs for 12 h and visualized using confocal fluorescence microscopy.

As expected, DN1bare was not taken into the cells to a measurable extent; we infer that this is partly due to its rapid denaturation and degradation in the culture medium (Supplementary Fig. 28). In contrast, DN1coated was internalized into dendritic cells (Supplementary Fig. 29) and, most importantly, we did not observe any measurable cytotoxicity (that is, signs of apoptosis) at maximum DN1coated concentration of 20 nM (Supplementary Note 1 and Supplementary Figs 49 and 50). BMDCs incubated with DN1coated exhibited punctate fluorescence indicative of DNs trapped in vesicles. Subsequently, we co-incubated BMDCs with Cy5-labelled DN1coated and fluorescein-labelled transferrin, which is a marker for endosomal compartments. Similar punctate fluorescence was observed in both colour channels, suggesting that DNs were mostly resident within endosomal and endolysosomal compartments of cells (Supplementary Fig. 30).

Structural integrity of DN inside cell compartments

The environment of cellular compartments can be drastically different from the outside medium and, therefore, it is of great interest to investigate the persistence and structural integrity of DNs within those compartments. To monitor the persistence of DNs within endosomal compartments of cells, we incubated Cy5-labelled DN1coated (5 nM final DN1 concentration, 90 nM Cy5 fluorophore) with BMDCs for 12 h and then washed the cells with culture medium to remove any excess DNs present in the medium. Subsequently, we monitored the decay in fluorescence intensity within cells for 24 h. We observed that fluorescence from DN1coated displayed a half-life of 8 h post washing within cells. DNs either can be exported as intact structures or else first degraded and then exported; our experiments could not differentiate between these two export trajectories (Supplementary Fig. 31).

To further assess the structural integrity of DNs within cells, we designed a FRET assay based on donor-fluorescence enhancement induced by acceptor photobleaching28; this is a commonly used technique to enhance the sensitivity of FRET detection. For this purpose, every alternate DNA oligonucleotide binding to the inner DNA helices (Fig. 4) of DN1coated was either functionalized at its 3′-end with an acceptor Cy5 fluorophore or at its 5′-end with a donor Cy3 fluorophore. The design is such that in an intact structure, the distance between adjacent Cy3 and Cy5 fluorophores is well under the estimated Förster distance of 5.6 nm; the distance between non-adjacent fluorophores is 8 nm. Energy transfer from a Cy3 donor to its adjacent Cy5 acceptor will result in the quenching of Cy3 fluorescence. After all Cy5 acceptors are photobleached using strong laser intensity, energy transfer from Cy3 to Cy5 is destroyed, resulting in the effective enhancement of the Cy3 donor signal. Alternatively, for structures where the close arrangement between Cy3 to Cy5 had previously been disrupted due to prior denaturation and/or degradation, then photobleaching of Cy5 will not result in any further Cy3 fluorescence enhancement. In cells, the amount of Cy3 fluorescence enhancement due to photobleaching therefore can be used to infer the amount of intact structures within the cells.

Figure 4: FRET assay of intracellular integrity of K10–PEG5K coated DN1.

(a) Schematic representation of the cross section of DN1 functionalized with Cy3 (green) and Cy5 (red) fluorophores. (b) caDNAno32 diagram highlighting the position of fluorophores relative to the other staples (blue: p7308 scaffold; brown: outer staples; orange: inner-middle staples; grey: inner staples) (c) Confocal images of primary BMDCs from mice incubated with Cy3 and Cy5 fluorophore labelled DN1. (d) Enhancement in Cy3 intensity upon Cy5 photobleaching of BMDCs measured using confocal microscopy at 0, 6, 12 and 24 normalized to in vitro measurements. Error bars represent s.d. (n=2).

To validate that our assay could be used to monitor structural integrity, first we verified the experiment on a single-molecule level in a cell-free environment by total internal reflectance fluorescence (TIRF) microscopy. For these measurements, Cy3/Cy5-labelled DN1coated was functionalized with 12 biotins and deposited on a streptavidin-coated glass surface and incubated in BMDC culture medium. After 99% laser photobleaching of Cy5 fluorophore, a 102.5%±2.4 enhancement in Cy3 fluorescence was observed (Supplementary Fig. 32). As a negative control, when Cy3 and Cy5 fluorophores in DN1coated were placed at distances>Förster distance, no appreciable enhancement in Cy3 fluorescence was observed (Supplementary Fig. 33). Furthermore, we verified in bulk studies that Cy3 fluorescence enhancement could be abolished by pre-incubation with DNase I (which degrades the structure) or PEI (which crushes the structure) (Supplementary Note 2 and Supplementary Figs 51–53). Interestingly, we found that even after 50% of the Cy3 fluorescence enhancement had been pre-degraded by DNase I, structural integrity (assessed by AGE and TEM) was retained. This is consistent with a model where DNs can sustain a large number of local strand scissions before catastrophic loss of structure occurs.

Encouraged by our cell-free results, we incubated Cy3/Cy5-labelled DN1coated with BMDCs for 12 h and washed the cells to remove excess structures. We then monitored the enhancement of Cy3 fluorescence upon Cy5 photobleaching at 0, 6, 12 and 24 h time points (Supplementary Figs 34–37). In this experiment, we observed enhancement of cellular donor fluorescence of 76.13%±8.2 at 0 h, 69.63%±7.3 at 6 h, 59.27%±8.5 at 12 h and 49.14%±9.8 at 24 h, respectively (Fig. 4).

The 20% decrease in the enhancement of donor fluorescence at 0 h post washing relative to the cell-free measurement is indicative of either our inability to accurately replicate endosomal and endolysosomal environments, or that some of the DN1coated are already partially degraded, or both. At 24 h post washing, 49.14%±9.8 enhancement of donor fluorescence was observed, suggesting that structurally intact DN1coated are still present within cells. We note here again that our cell-free experiments (Supplementary Note 2 and Supplementary Fig. 51) demonstrated that structures that display 50% of maximum fluorescence enhancement remained globally intact as indicated by agarose-gel and TEM analysis; this implies that most particles retained their structural integrity in endosomes at our 24 h post-washing time point. A model consistent with these observations is that most particles that have globally collapsed are rapidly removed from the endosomal compartments; as discussed above, 87% of uptaken DNs have been cleared from endosomes by the 24 h post-wash time point.

Biodistribution of DN1coated in mice

Finally, we profiled the biodistribution of Alexa 750-labelled DN1coated injected retro-orbitally in mice and compared it with negative controls: Alexa 750-labelled DNA oligonucleotide and Alexa 750-labelled DN1bare. Alexa 750 fluorescence was monitored every 2 min for 1 h using Perkin Elmer in vivo imaging system (IVIS, Supplementary Fig. 38). Subsequently, organs were harvested and analysed individually (Supplementary Fig. 39). Both the DNA oligonucleotide and the DN1bare displayed rapid renal clearance (as evidenced by accumulation in the bladder), with a half time of 5 min and 9 min, respectively (Fig. 5 and Supplementary Fig. 40). In contrast, DN1coated was cleared more slowly with a half-life of 45 min; we hypothesize this improvement was due to the increased resistance of DN1coated structures to denaturation and nuclease degradation, while in circulation.

Figure 5: In vivo optical imaging for biodistribution and pharmacokinetics of DN1coated.

(a) Fluorescence images of mice injected with either Alexa750 DNA oligo or DN1bare and DN1coated functionalized with 36 Alexa750 fluorophores at 2 min post injection. (b) Mean fluorescence intensity in bladder versus time. (Shaded regions represent s.d., n=3; two-way analysis of variance test; **P<=0.01 and ****P<0.0001).


Herein we have developed a method that overcomes two major challenges that limit the effective utilization of DNs in vivo. Coating of DNs with positively charged oligolysine such as K10 stabilizes them against denaturation at physiological divalent-ion concentrations and remarkably results in little or no distortion of the three-dimensional structure, as assessed by inspection of negative-stain TEM images. Coating with a PEGylated oligolysine co-polymer, K10–PEG5K significantly stabilizes the DNs against nuclease degradation by 1,000-fold. K10–PEG5K-coated DNs are readily taken up into endosomes and endolysosomes of BMDC without any apparent cytotoxicity (that is, visible rounding of cells). A significant fraction of endocytosed DNs (13%) persist as intact structures within the cellular compartments even after 24 h. Preliminary mice experiments show modest improvement in circulation and biodistribution of DN1coated relative to DN1bare. PEGylated oligolysine therefore offers a low-cost, highly effective method for protection of DNs for local therapeutic delivery and, potentially, for systemic therapeutic delivery applications, where modest circulation times are sufficient. In the future, longer circulation times may be achievable by additional surface decorations, for example, CD47 ‘don’t eat me’ signals29.



Tris/Borate/EDTA buffer, PCR tubes and 96-well PCR plates were purchased from VWR. Oligolysine (K4–K10 and R6) were purchased from Peptide 2.0 as crude in a 5 mg scale. Oligolysine K10–PEG1K, K10–PEG5K and K10–PEG20K were purchased from Alamada polymers in 100 mg scale. Agarose was purchased from Lonza. Magnesium chloride, sodium chloride, glycerol, Tris base, EDTA and Tween20 was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. RPMI, PBS, FBS and penicillin–streptomycin were purchased from Gibco. Carbon Formvar grids and uranyl formate were purchased from Electron Microscopy Sciences. Amicon Ultra filtration devices and 3.5 K MWCO Slide-A-Lyzer mini dialysis devices were purchased from Fisher Scientific. DNA gel extraction spin column was purchased from Bio-Rad.

Nanostructure synthesis and purification

The design-specific staple strands were purchased from IDT Technologies in 250 μM scale. The sequence of the staple strands and the design is reported in the Supplementary Information. The p7308 scaffold strand was produced from M13 phage replication in Escherichia coli and was endotoxin-purified using Triton X-114 as described previously13.

For the synthesis of DNs, 10 nM p7308 scaffold was mixed with tenfold excess of staples in TE buffer (5 mM Tris and 1 mM EDTA) containing 10–20 mM MgCl2. The amount of MgCl2 varied with the structure: DN1 (10 mM), DN2 (6 mM), DN3 (10 mM), DN4 (10 mM), DN5 (10 mM), DN6 (12 mM), DN7 (14 mM), DN8 (12 mM) and DN9 (6 mM). The solutions were subjected to a thermal annealing ramp on a Tetrad 2 Peltier thermal cycler (Bio-Rad) according to the following schedule: incubate at 65 °C for 15 min, decrease to 50 °C, incubate at 50 °C for 6 h 30 min and decrease to 40 °C at 6 h 30 min °C−1. The quality of folding was analysed by AGE. Solutions of folded DN were concentrated tenfold using a 30k MWCO Amicon Ultra centrifugal filter device (Millipore) and then purified by glycerol gradient ultracentrifugation30. The 45% and 15% glycerol solutions were made in 1 × TE buffer containing the same levels of MgCl2 as required for folding. The glycerol fractions containing nanostructures was concentrated and buffer exchanged to remove glycerol using a 30k MWCO Amicon Ultra centrifugal filter device. Following purification, the stock solution was diluted appropriately for TEM imaging to verify quality. The stock concentration was determined by ultraviolet absorbance at 260 nm on a Nanodrop spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific), assuming that A260=1 for 50 μg ml−1 DNs. Stock solutions were stored at 4 °C until use.

Agarose gel electrophoresis

After folding, DNs were analysed by AGE (2% agarose, 0.5 × TBE 10 mM MgCl2, 1 × ethidium bromide) using Thermo Scientific EasyCast Mini Gel System apparatus. Ten microlitres of samples were mixed with 3 μl of 6 × loading buffer and were loaded into the agarose gel. The samples were allowed to migrate for 2–3 h (running buffer: 0.5 × TBE, 11 mM MgCl2; 65 V). The gel was imaged with Typhoon FLA 9000 (GE Healthcare Life Sciences). To recover nanostructures, the bands were visualized with ultraviolet light and cut out from the gel. Extracted bands were crushed and placed into a DNA gel extraction spin column (Bio-Rad). The nanostructure solution was recovered by centrifugation of the loaded column for 5 min at 13,000 g.

Negative-stain TEM analysis

Three microlitres of DNs were pipetted onto a plasma-treated carbon Formvar grid (Electron Microscopy Sciences) and incubated for 1 min. The solution was wicked away onto filter paper and 7 μl of freshly prepared 2% uranyl formate (in H2O, w/v) was immediately added. This was incubated for 0.5 min and then wicked away by filter paper. Imaging was carried out on a JEOL 1400 TEM.

Coating with K10 and K10–PEGnK

Ten microlitres of 10 nM DN1–DN9 was mixed with 1 μl of oligolysine (K10 or K10–PEGnK) at a concentration where the desired N:P ratio (ratio of nitrogen in amines:phosphates in DNA) would be achieved and the sample incubated at room temperature for 30 min. K10–PEGnK were purchased from Alamanda polymers, their polydispersity index from gel permeation chromatography is between 1.00 and 1.20. The number average molecular weight range by NMR as provided by the company for K10–PEG1K is 2,200–3,100 Da, for K10–PEG5K is 5,800–7,500 Da and for K10–PEG20K is 18,000–22,000 Da.

Magnesium depletion assays

Bare DNs and K10 or K10–PEG5K-coated DNs were diluted in RPMI-1640 medium (Gibco) such that the final Mg2+ concentration is 0.6 mM. The samples were incubated at 37 °C for 1 h on a Tetrad 2 Peltier thermal cycler (Bio-Rad) and analysed using AGE and TEM imaging. Alternatively, 100 μl bare DNs and K10 or K10–PEG5K-coated DNs were added to 3.5 K MWCO Slide-A-Lyzer mini dialysis units (Fisher Scientific) and dialysed overnight at room temperature into zero-Mg2+ buffer (5 mM Tris, 1 mM EDTA pH 8.0). The liquid remaining in the dialysis unit was collected and analysed using AGE and negative-stain TEM.

Nuclease degradation assay

Bare DNs, K10 or K10–PEG5K-coated DNs were diluted in RPMI-1640 medium (Gibco) containing different amounts of DNase I or 10% freshly thawed FBS (Gibco; heat-inactivated at 56 °C by the vendor) such that the final Mg2+ ion concentration is 0.6 mM. The samples were incubated at 37 °C for 0–24 h on a Tetrad 2 Peltier thermal cycler (Bio-Rad) and analysed using AGE and TEM imaging.

Nuclease deactivation assay

Freshly prepared cell medium containing 10% FBS and solutions containing up to 50 U ml−1 DNase I could be inactivated by the addition of 5 mM EGTA and 10% β-mercaptoethanol, and incubation at 37 °C for 30 min.

Removal of K10 or K10–PEGnK shell from DNs

Chondroitin sulfate (100 × , excess to the number of amines) was added to K10 or K10–PEG5K-coated DNs and the medium adjusted to 10 mM Mg. The sample was incubated at 37 °C for 1–2 h during which the oligolysine shell was removed from the DNs upon electrostatic binding of oligolysine with chondroitin sulfate. In the nuclease degradation assays, nucleases were deactivated using EGTA and β-mercaptoethanol before the removal of the oligolysine shell.

In vitro microscopy measurements

Sample preparation: a 1.5 coverslip and a glass slide were sandwiched together by two strips of double-sided tape to form a flow chamber. The volume of the flow chamber was 20 μl. The chamber was incubated for 30 min with 20 μl of 1 mg ml−1 BSA-Biotin, followed by incubation for 30 min with 20 μl of 1 mg ml−1 streptavidin. The chamber was then washed three times with PBS. Twenty microlitres of K10–PEG5K-coated biotinylated DNs were then introduced in the flow chamber at 10 nM concentrations. The chamber was epoxy sealed before imaging. Imaging: samples were imaged using Zeiss Axio Observer inverted fluorescence microscope. Samples were excited either with 540–580 nm LED (Colibri; Cy3 excitation) or with a 625 nm LED (Colibri; Cy5 excitation). Zeiss filter sets 43 HE and 50 were used for Cy3 and Cy5 imaging, respectively. Signal was collected using an Orca-Flash 4.0 sCMOS from Hamamatsu. All data were collected using a 10 × /0.3 Ph1 (WD=5.2 mm) Zeiss objective. Built-in image processing and analysis tools from Fiji ( were used to analyse all data.

Isolation and culture of BMDCs

BMDCs were derived using established methods31. Briefly, bone marrow cells were isolated from female C57Bl/6J mice (Jackson Laboratories) and cultured in RPMI (Lonza) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FBS (Sigma-Aldrich), 1% penicillin/streptomycin, 50 μM β-mercaptoethanol (Sigma-Aldrich) and 20 ng ml−1 granulocyte–macrophage colony-stimulating factor (Peprotech). Non-adherent dendritic cells between day 7 and 10 were harvested and used for experiments.

Cell uptake assay

For uptake studies, BMDCs were seeded at a density of 50,000 cells per well into 1.5 glass-bottom 96-well plates from Mat-tek and allowed to grow overnight. Samples were prepared by diluting them to 10 nM concentrations in a total volume of 100 μl BMDC cell medium (RPMI-1640 supplemented with 10% FBS, β-mercaptoethanol and granulocyte–macrophage colony-stimulating factor). Cell uptake was monitored using confocal microscopy (SP5 × MP inverted confocal microscope, Leica) at time points between 0 and 24 h. A sequential z-stack was imaged using a 0.2 μm slice thickness, in the following excitation sequence: first scan: Cy3 excitation/Cy5 emission, second scan: bright field and Cy3 excitation/ Cy3 emission; and third scan: Cy5 excitation/Cy5 emission. To bleach the acceptor dye, region of interest was set to 2.5 × zoom of the initial field of view and laser power for Cy5 excitation was increased to 100%. The slice was bleached for 10 min, until the Cy5 signal was absent. Zoom was reset to 1 and a new z-stack of the initial field of view was recorded.

Cell image analysis

Z-stacks were loaded into Imaris software package and dimensions were cropped to represent the cell area. The new stacks were imported into image processing and analysis software from Fiji and a Z projection based on average intensity was made. Regions inside and outside the bleached area were selected using the freehand selection tool and the integrated intensity was measured. DN1 containing only 18 Cy3 (donor-only) dyes or 18 Cy5 dyes (acceptor only) were used to estimate the background corrections.

Biodistribution experiments

Optical imaging experiments on mice were carried out using the IVIS spectrum instrument (Perkin Elmer). Three mice per sample were anaesthetized under 2% isofluorane and were injected retro-orbitally with 100 μl volume of Alexa 750 oligo, DN1bare and DN1coated functionalized with 36 Alexa 750 fluorophores such that final concentration of Alexa 750 fluorophore is 0.625 μM. The mice were immediately transferred to the imaging system and maintained at 2% isofluorane throughout imaging. Fluorescence images for kinetic analysis were acquired by a 30 s excitation at 745 nm and emission at 800 nm, every 2 min for a total of 1 h post injection. After collection of fluorescence data, the mice were immediately killed, and blood, urine and organs were harvested and were imaged on the IVIS system. Analysis was carried out on ImageJ. Fluorescence accumulation in the bladder was measured by using the freehand selection tool to draw a region of interest around the bladder and then integrating the density. The data set was normalized to the maximum fluorescence intensity in the bladder, when Alexa 750 dye oligo is administered alone. Fluorescence accumulation in bladder versus time was fitted to an exponential using MATLAB to extract half-life.

Animal use

All animal studies were performed in accordance with NIH guidelines, under the approval of Harvard University’s Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.

Data availability

Data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article (and its Supplementary Information files) and from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Additional information

How to cite this article: Ponnuswamy, N. et al. Oligolysine-based coating protects DNA nanostructures from low-salt denaturation and nuclease degradation. Nat. Commun. 8, 15654 doi: 10.1038/ncomms15654 (2017).

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.


  1. 1

    Rothemund, P. W. K. Folding DNA to create nanoscale shapes and patterns. Nature 440, 297–302 (2006).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Douglas, S. M. et al. Self-assembly of DNA into nanoscale three-dimensional shapes. Nature 459, 414–418 (2009).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Dietz, H., Douglas, S. M. & Shih, W. M. Folding DNA into twisted and curved nano-scale shapes. Science 325, 725–730 (2009).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Han, D. et al. DNA origami with complex curvatures in three-dimensional space. Science 332, 342–346 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Wei, B., Dai, M. & Yin, P. Complex shapes self-assembled from single-stranded DNA tiles. Nature 485, 623–626 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Ke, Y., Ong, L. L., Shih, W. M. & Yin, P. Three-dimensional structures self-assembled from DNA bricks. Science 338, 1177–1183 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Li, J. et al. Self-assembled multivalent DNA nanostructures for noninvasive intracellular delivery of immunostimulatory CpG oligonucleotides. ACS Nano 5, 8783–8789 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Andersen, E. S. et al. Self-assembly of a nanoscale DNA box with a controllable lid. Nature 459, 73–76 (2009).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Douglas, S. M., Bachelet, I. & Church, G. M. A logic-gated nanorobot for targeted transport of molecular payloads. Science 335, 831–834 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Liu, M. et al. A DNA tweezer-actuated enzyme nanoreactor. Nat. Commun. 4, 2127 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Banerjee, A. et al. Controlled release of encapsulated cargo from a DNA icosahedron using a chemical trigger. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 52, 6854–6857 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Jahnen-Dechent, W. & Ketteler, M. Magnesium basics. Clin. Kidney J. 5, i3–i14 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Hahn, J., Wickham, S. F. J., Shih, W. M. & Perrault, S. D. Addressing the instability of DNA nanostructures in tissue culture. ACS Nano 8, 8765–8775 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Conway, J. W., McLaughlin, C. K., Castor, K. J. & Sleiman, H. DNA nanostructure serum stability: greater than the sum of its parts. Chem. Commun. 49, 1172–1174 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Mei, Q. et al. Stability of DNA origami nanoarrays in cell lysate. Nano Lett. 11, 1477–1482 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Surana, S., Bhatia, D. & Krishnan, Y. A. Method to study in vivo stability of DNA nanostructures. Methods 64, 94–100 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Cassinelli, V. et al. One-step formation of chain-armour stabilized DNA nanostructures. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54, 7795–7798 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Benson, E. et al. DNA rendering of polyhedral meshes at the nanoscale. Nature 523, 441–444 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Veneziano, R. et al. Designer nanoscale DNA assemblies programmed from the top down. Science 352, 1534 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Mikkilä, J. et al. Virus-encapulated DNA origami nanostructures for cellular delivery. Nano Lett. 14, 2196–2200 (2014).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Kiviaho, J. K. et al. Cationic polymers for DNA origami coating — examining their binding efficiency and tuning the enzymatic reaction rates. Nanoscale 8, 11674–11680 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Perrault, S. D. & Shih, W. M. Virus-inspired membrance encapsulation of DNA nanostructures to achieve in vivo stability. ACS Nano 8, 5132–5140 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Boussif, O. et al. A versatile vector for gene and oligonucleotide transfer into cells in culture and in vivo: polyethyleneimine. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 92, 7297–7301 (1995).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    van Vlerken, L. E., Vyas, T. K. & Amiji, M. M. Poly(ethylene glycol)-modified nanocarriers for tumor-targeted and intracellular delivery. Pharm. Res. 24, 1405–1414 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Vanecko, S. & Laskowski, M. Sr Studies of the specificity of deoxyribonuclease I. III. Hydrolysis of chains carrying a monoesterified phosphate on carbon 5′. J. Biol. Chem. 236, 3312–3316 (1961).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Haubner, R. et al. Structural and functional aspects of RGD-containing cyclic pentapeptides as highly potent and selective integrin αvβ3 antagonists. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 118, 7461–7472 (1996).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Yoshinaga, T., Yasuda, K., Ogawa, Y. & Takakura, Y. Efficient uptake and rapid degradation of plasmid DNA by murine dendritic cells via a specific mechanism. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 299, 389–394 (2002).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Mekler, V. M. A photochemical technique to enhance sensitivity of detection of fluorescence resonance energy transfer. Photochem. Photobiol. 59, 615–620 (1994).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Rodriguez, P. L. et al. Minimal ‘self’ peptides that inhibit phagocytic clearance and enhance delivery of nanoparticles. Science 339, 971–975 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30

    Lin, C., Perrault, S. D., Kwak, M., Graf, F. & Shih, W. M. Purification of DNA-origami nanostructures by rate-zonal centrifugation. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, e40 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31

    Bhattacharya, P., Gopisetty, A., Ganesh, B. B., Sheng, J. R. & Prabhakar, B. S. GM-CSF-induced, bone-marrow-derived dendritic cells can expand natural Tregs and induce adaptive Tregs by different mechanisms. J. Leukoc. Biol. 89, 235–249 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32

    Douglas, S. M. et al. Rapid prototyping of 3D DNA-origami shapes with caDNAno. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, 5001–5006 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We are grateful to Schlumberger Faculty for Future Fellowship support to N.P., Human Frontiers of Science Foundation Fellowship support to M.M.C.B., support from NSF Expeditions (1317694), NSF DMREF (1435964), Army Research Office (W911NF-12-1-0420), Dana Farber Cancer Institute Claudia Adams Barr Award and the Wyss Institute at Harvard Faculty Award to W.M.S. We thank Garry Cuneo and Thomas Ferrante for maintaining the TEM and microscopy facilities.

Author information




N.P., M.M.C.B. and W.M.S. designed the experiments. N.P. completed the experiments. M.M.C.B. performed the cellular uptake experiments. M.V. designed the FRET system. B.N. performed the in vitro FRET experiments. J.H.R., L.Y.T.C. and F.M.A. performed the cyclic arginine-glycine-aspartate uptake study. W.A.L. and M.M.C.B. performed the biodistribution experiments. N.P., M.M.C.B., B.N., D.J.M. and W.M.S. wrote the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William M. Shih.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

N.P., M.M.C.B. and W.M.S. have filed a patent (PCT/US2014/064659) covering positive amine-induced protection of DNs from in vivo threats. The remaining authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figures, Supplementary Tables and Supplementary References. (PDF 15961 kb)

Supplementary Data 1

ponnuswamy_Supplementary_Data_1.xlsx: DNA sequences for DN1 (XLSX 60 kb)

Supplementary Data 2

ponnuswamy_Supplementary_Data_2.xlsx: DNA sequences for DN2 (XLSX 58 kb)

Supplementary Data 3

ponnuswamy_Supplementary_Data_3.xlsx: DNA sequences for DN3 (XLSX 58 kb)

Supplementary Data 4

ponnuswamy_Supplementary_Data_4.xlsx: DNA sequences for DN4 (XLSX 62 kb)

Supplementary 5

ponnuswamy_Supplementary_Data_5.xlsx: DNA sequences for DN5 (XLSX 54 kb)

Supplementary Data 6

ponnuswamy_Supplementary_Data_6.xlsx: DNA sequences for DN6 (XLSX 57 kb)

Supplementary Data 7

ponnuswamy_Supplementary_Data_7.xlsx: DNA sequences for DN7 (XLSX 58 kb)

Supplementary Data 8

ponnuswamy_Supplementary_Data_8.xlsx: DNA sequences for DN8 (XLSX 56 kb)

Supplementary Data 9

ponnuswamy_Supplementary_Data_9.xlsx: DNA sequences for DN9 (XLSX 56 kb)

Supplementary Data 10

ponnuswamy_Supplementary_Data_10.xlsx: DNA sequences for Cy3/Cy5functionalized DN1 (XLSX 56 kb)

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ponnuswamy, N., Bastings, M., Nathwani, B. et al. Oligolysine-based coating protects DNA nanostructures from low-salt denaturation and nuclease degradation. Nat Commun 8, 15654 (2017).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing