Homologous recombination (HR) is a central process of genome biology driven by a conserved recombinase, which catalyses the pairing of single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) with double-stranded DNA to generate a D-loop intermediate. Bacterial RadA is a conserved HR effector acting with RecA recombinase to promote ssDNA integration. The mechanism of this RadA-mediated assistance to RecA is unknown. Here, we report functional and structural analyses of RadA from the human pathogen Streptococcus pneumoniae. RadA is found to facilitate RecA-driven ssDNA recombination over long genomic distances during natural transformation. RadA is revealed as a hexameric DnaB-type helicase, which interacts with RecA to promote orientated unwinding of branched DNA molecules mimicking D-loop boundaries. These findings support a model of DNA branch migration in HR, relying on RecA-mediated loading of RadA hexamers on each strand of the recipient dsDNA in the D-loop, from which they migrate divergently to facilitate incorporation of invading ssDNA.
Bacteria are only able to generate clonal descendants, and their genetic diversity is maintained by the accumulation of random point mutations. As such, they should be extremely vulnerable to changes in their environment. Instead, these organisms are extremely adaptable and capable of adjusting their lifestyle very quickly when changes occur. One dramatic illustration of this capacity is the spread of antibiotic resistance among bacterial pathogens1 due to antibiotics overuse in human healthcare and livestock1. The discovery of penicillin by Alexander Fleming in 1928 ushered in the antibiotic era. Nowadays, about 30 antibiotics represent our only line of defence against many bacterial pathogens2. During the last decade, the emergence of multi-resistant bacteria, refractive to several treatments, led to increased mortality caused by common infections3.
In this context, it is crucial to fully understand the molecular mechanism of bacterial adaptability to ultimately target and limit it. Among the several processes involved, homologous recombination (HR) is key, since it is fundamental to the maintenance and the plasticity of bacterial genomes. This process is also a key step of horizontal gene transfer processes such as conjugation and natural transformation, facilitating the acquisition of new genetic traits. The different HR pathways are driven in their early steps by a common multitasking motor protein (referred herein to as an HR recombinase) highly conserved in the three domains of life, named RecA in bacteria, Rad51 and Dmc1 in eukaryotes and RadA in archaea4,5. They catalyse the DNA exchange reaction between complementary strands in an ordered and ATP-dependent manner, as depicted for RecA in Fig. 1a. RecA first assembles into a helical filament on single-stranded DNA (ssDNA), growing mainly in the 5′ to 3′ direction5,6. Next, the resulting nucleofilament identifies and pairs the bound ssDNA with homologous double-stranded DNA (dsDNA), and promotes DNA branch migration towards the 3′ end of the invading DNA strand7. These consecutive reactions driven by HR recombinases result in a triple-stranded DNA product, commonly named a ‘Displacement-loop’ (D-loop). Next, the D-loop is processed further and finally resolved to restore the DNA duplex.
Other types of motor proteins are also known to promote DNA branch migration reactions in distinct HR pathways. They all promote homologous DNA strand exchange on preformed branched DNA molecules. The bacterial RuvB and RecG DNA helicases are among the best characterized of these HR effectors8. They promote DNA migration at DNA junctions by a distinct mechanism relying on their ATP-dependent translocation along dsDNA. RuvB acts on two opposite dsDNA arms of four-way Holliday junctions (HJ), with the assistance of RuvA specifically bound at the crossing of the four DNA arms. Once assembled at the HJ, the RuvAB complex functions as a dual DNA pump energized by the ATP hydrolysis at the level of two RuvB hexameric rings encircling the two duplex arms of the HJ9. RecG acts as a monomer on various branched DNA substrates, including HJ, three-way junctions (such as those that define the boundaries of the HR D-loop) and forked DNA molecules. Bound to these branched DNA substrates, RecG promotes DNA branch migration by driving simultaneously dsDNA unwinding and rewinding of complementary DNA strands10,11. A third emerging HR effector able to promote DNA branch migration in bacteria is the RadA/Sms protein (named hereafter as RadA, and distinct from the archeal RadA HR recombinase). RadA has been historically identified and characterized in Escherichia coli, where it has been genetically defined as being involved in the recombinational repair of damaged DNA12. This was confirmed in Bacillus subtilis and Streptococcus pneumoniae, for which RadA was also found to be involved in the dedicated HR pathway of natural genetic transformation13,14, an horizontal gene transfer process that takes place during the particular physiological state of bacterial competence15,16. Further in vivo analysis of RadA function in HR pathways of genome maintenance in E. coli have highlighted its functional redundancy with RecG and RuvAB12,17. Recently, biochemical analysis of purified E. coli RadA showed that it acts at a 3-way junction (3-J) made by RecA to promote branch migration in an ATP-dependent manner, either with or without RecA18. In this DNA transaction reaction, RadA mimics the DNA strand exchange reaction catalysed by RecA in the 3′ direction of the ssDNA paired to the homologous dsDNA template. On the basis of the sequence homology shared between the central domain of RadA and the ATP binding core domain of RecA19, it was therefore proposed that RadA would act like, and possibly with, RecA, through a coordinated binding of the invading ssDNA and recipient dsDNA18.
To gain insight into the molecular mechanism of RadA function during HR, we combined an in vivo analysis of RadA function in genetic transformation in S. pneumoniae with its structural and biochemical characterization in vitro. We find that RadA is required to recombine ssDNA across long distances in the genome during transformation. This genetic study highlighted the key role of RadA in extending RecA-driven transformation D-loops either in the 3′ or 5′ direction relative to the polarity of the invading ssDNA. The crystal structure of pneumococcal RadA revealed that its central domain adopts the same fold as the helicase domain of bacterial replicative DnaB-type helicases. In addition, like DnaB proteins, we show that RadA assembles into a ring-shaped hexamer and is a functional DNA helicase that loads onto ssDNA and translocates in a 3′ direction along it to unwind dsDNA. As such, RadA unwinds the 5′ tailed dsDNA of synthetic 3-J substrates. We also found that RadA interacts with RecA, which allows unwinding of the 3′ tailed dsDNA of the 3-J substrate. Altogether, these findings support an unprecedented, to the best of our knowledge, model for a DNA branch migration mechanism in HR mediated by RadA. The helicase migrates divergently from the boundaries of the HR D-loop and is loaded by RecA on both strands of the recipient dsDNA.
RadA promotes the extension of transformation D-loops
Natural genetic transformation is driven by a dedicated multiprotein machinery, named the transformasome20, which assembles in the cell membrane and promotes the binding of exogenous dsDNA on the surface of competent cells, the internalization of one DNA strand and its integration into genomic DNA via RecA-driven HR (Fig. 1b). In the human pathogen S. pneumoniae, all cells become competent for ∼20 min in response to various stresses, including some antibiotics15,21,22,23. Pneumococcal transformation frequency measured for a selective point mutation present within fully homologous chromosomal donor DNA is reduced 100-fold in cells lacking radA13 (Supplementary Fig. 1a). One explanation of this deficit is that RadA may act to extend ssDNA incorporation at HR transformation D-loops, a proposal supported by the recent finding that E. coli RadA can promote DNA branch migration in vitro18. If so, RadA would maximize the amount of transforming ssDNA integrated within the genome, and thus the number of mutations acquired by competent pneumococci. To test this possibility, we repeated the transformation experiments by using donor PCR fragments of similar size (∼4 kbp) carrying a selectable point mutation located either centrally (PCRc) or close to one end (PCRe; Fig. 1c). In contrast to chromosomal donor DNA, the use of PCR donor fragments raises the amount of transforming ssDNA molecules internalized per cell in the population (Fig. 1d and Supplementary Fig. 1b). Transformation frequency is proportional to the amount of PCRc donor DNA added and can exceed 85% (Supplementary Fig. 1c). Random cleavage of these PCR fragments, followed by ssDNA degradation and internalization by the 3′ end (Fig. 1b), alters the position of the point mutation on the transforming ssDNA molecules (Fig. 1d). For PCRc, the mutation will be equally distributed between the middle and the 3′ end of the transforming ssDNA molecules. For PCRe, the mutation will be located almost exclusively near the 5′ end. The radA mutant exhibited a frequency of transformation with PCRc nearly 50-fold lower than wild-type, at a ratio of DNA molecules per cell estimated at ∼100. Remarkably, in the same conditions, transformation of the radA mutant with PCRe was 3,000-fold less frequent than wild type (Fig. 1e). Similar results were obtained with two other selectable point mutations (Supplementary Fig. 1d). In addition, the use of large amounts of PCRc donor DNA diminished the need for RadA in transformation (Supplementary Fig. 1c), suggesting that RadA acts to potentiate RecA-directed incorporation of transforming ssDNA in the genome. The lower transformation frequency measured in radA− cells transformed with PCRe compared to PCRc strongly supports the notion that RadA extends ssDNA incorporation from RecA-driven transformation D-loops. Importantly, the strong transformation deficit obtained with the PCRe donor fragments also indicate that RadA could promote DNA branch migration in the 5′ direction of the D-loop, thereby improving the integration of transforming ssDNA molecules over extensive genomic distances.
Crystal structure of pneumococcal RadA
All bacterial RadA proteins are characterized at the sequence level by three conserved domains12 (Fig. 2a): a potential C4-type zinc binding motif (C4); a central canonical RecA-like ATPase domain (H), including a KNRFG motif unique to and strictly conserved in RadA proteins; and a region homologous to the protease domain (P) of the bacterial Lon protein. The full-length protein (RadAFL) and the P domain (RadAP) of pneumococcal RadA were purified from E. coli and shown to assemble predominantly as hexamers in solution (Supplementary Fig. 2a–c). The assembly into hexamers is neither dependent on nucleotide binding nor on the presence of Mg2+ ions. The crystal structure of RadAP was solved at 2.5 Å resolution (Table 1, Supplementary Fig. 10) and the structure of RadAFL bound to thymidine diphosphate (dTDP) was solved at 3.5 Å resolution (Table 1, Supplementary Fig. 11). The structure of RadAFL reveals three protomers per asymmetric unit, organized as annular hexameric particles with two-fold symmetry (Fig. 2b, Supplementary Fig. 2a,b) and forming a two-tiered planar ring, corresponding to the H and P domains (Fig. 2a). The C4 domain (residues 1–35), present but unresolved in the crystal structure, likely occupies the gap observed in the crystal packing and is a functional zinc finger (Supplementary Fig. 2d,f). Indeed, RadAFL binds zinc and to a smaller extent iron (Supplementary Fig. 2d,f), while a RadA derivative deleted of the C4 domain (RadAΔC4) was no longer able to bind the divalent metals (Supplementary Fig. 2e,g).
The central H domain and the clasp in the RadAFL structure (residues 53–274) forms a ring with two-fold symmetry, with outer and inner diameters of 100 and 25 Å, respectively (Fig. 2b). It displays a typical RecA-fold containing a nucleotide-binding site (Fig. 2c) and it is, most likely, the functional core. The position and dynamics of the H domain are different in each protomer of the asymmetric unit regardless of the nucleotide bound (Supplementary Fig. 3a,b). In the RadAFL structure obtained upon crystallization in the presence of dTTP, each protomer was occupied by a hydrolysed dTDP. The nucleotide binding site displays all the canonical residues found in an ATPase active site of the RecA ATPase family24 (Fig. 2c). However, no arginine finger, required for nucleotide hydrolysis was found close to this site.
While RadA is considered to be a RecA homologue on the basis of the sequence of its central H domain18, fold recognition servers such as Dali25 or PDBeFold26 revealed that its crystal structure is similar to that of the helicase domain found in ring-shaped hexameric replicative helicases of the DnaB family, with Gp4 of bacteriophage T7 (ref. 27) being its closest structural paralogue (Fig. 3a). DnaB interaction with ssDNA involves two loops, L1 and L2, located inside the hexameric ring28, which are found unresolved at the same location in the RadAFL crystal structure (Figs 2a and 3a). The H domains from both Gp4 and RadA share positively charged external surfaces and a clasp that links one domain to the other (Fig. 3b,c). The structural similarity between the two proteins is limited to the H domain, which is encompassed by different domains (Fig. 3d,e).
In the structures of RadAP and RadAFL, the P domain (residues 290–453) forms a ring with six-fold symmetry (Figs 2b and 3g). In RadAFL, the outer and inner diameters of the P ring are 100 and 15 Å, respectively (Figs 2b and 3g). RadAP is structurally related to the proteolytic domain of Lon proteases (LonP), which also assembles into a stable annular hexamer, within the full-length protein and as an independent domain (Fig. 3f,g)29. However, the typical lysine and serine residues of the protease catalytic dyad in LonP are replaced in the pneumococcal RadAP domain by an arginine and an alanine, respectively (Figs 2c and 3f). Furthermore, even though the sequence and the fold are similar, the electrostatic potentials of the inner side of the rings have opposite charges, namely negative in the LonP and positive in RadAP (Fig. 3g,h). Thus, RadAP appears to be structurally but not functionally related to LonP, both adopting the same ring-shaped hexameric architecture. In both RadAFL and RadAp, the hexameric structure is primarily maintained by the extensive surface of interaction between adjacent P domains (940–976 Å). At the level of the H domain, inter-protomer contacts (268–848 Å) are enhanced by the N-terminal clasp (residues 53–65) that winds around the neighbouring H domain between two H domains (Figs 2c and 3b). Importantly, most of the residues conserved among RadA proteins map at the interfaces between the monomers and inside the H and P rings (Supplementary Fig. 7c), indicating that this hexameric ring should be a conserved feature of RadA proteins.
RadA is a helicase involved in homologous recombination
As mentioned above the H domain of RadA is a close structural paralogue of the helicase domain of Gp4, a prototypical member of the DnaB subfamily of SF4 helicases. These mostly hexameric proteins unwind dsDNA by encircling a ssDNA strand and translocating along this strand exclusively in the 5′ to 3′ direction, a process fuelled by NTP hydrolysis (generally ATP27). To test whether the structural similarity to SF4 helicases was also functional, we investigated the ATPase and dsDNA unwinding activities of RadA. We recombinantly expressed and purified full-length native pneumococcal RadA, together with four RadA derivatives containing alanine substitutions for key residues of the H and C4 domains (Supplementary Fig. 4a,b): K101A in the Walker A motif of the ATPase domain, K251A and R253A in the KNRFG motif (Fig. 4a) and C27A in the C4 domain. All four mutant proteins assemble mainly as hexamers in solution, except for the RadAC27A mutant that forms a mixture of multimers and hexamers (Supplementary Fig. 4b). Wild-type RadA displays hardly any basal ATPase activity. This activity is stimulated 10-fold by dsDNA and 50-fold by ssDNA (Fig. 4b and Supplementary Fig. 4c). Notably, stimulation of RadAK101A ATPase activity is severely reduced in the presence of ssDNA (Supplementary Fig. 4c).
Next, we showed that RadA is an active helicase, by using agarose gel electrophoresis to detect unwinding of a fluorescent oligonucleotide hybridized to a large circular ssDNA molecule (Fig. 4c). RadA was found unable to unwind a full dsDNA linear substrate (Fig. 4d), indicating that initiation of helicase activity requires a ssDNA overhang. Indeed, using short 3′ or 5′ tailed duplexes, we found that RadA unwinds dsDNA by translocating along ssDNA from 5′ to 3′ (Fig. 4e), a feature common to DnaB helicases24,27. RadA helicase activity is as efficient on forked DNA as on tailed DNA (Fig. 4e), contrasting with DnaB that restrictively unwinds forked dsDNA encountered during its translocation along ssDNA30. In agreement with their deficiencies in ATP hydrolysis, the helicase activity was not observed with the K101A, K251A and R253A mutants (Fig. 4c). Interestingly, the RadAC27A mutant displays both ATPase and helicase activities, implying that the integrity of the C4 domain is not needed for ATP hydrolysis or to unwind dsDNA (Fig. 4b,c and Supplementary Fig. 4c).
Modelling the H domain of RadA on that of the previously solved structure of DnaB from Geobacillus stearothermophilus bound to ssDNA, identifies K251 and R253 of the conserved KNRFG motif as respectively, the potential ‘piston’ and the ‘arginine finger’ of the ATPase active site of the neighbouring protomer31. Consistent with this proposal, RadAK251A and RadAR253A mutants displayed lower ssDNA-induced ATPase and helicase activities than wild-type RadA (Fig. 4b,c and Supplementary Fig. 4c). In the RadA crystal structure, R253 is located further away from the ATPase active site of the neighbouring protomer (11 Å) than the corresponding residue in DnaB helicases31. This difference could explain the very low basal ATPase activity of RadA.
The analysis of RadA interaction with long circular ssDNA molecules by electron microscopy (EM) revealed a ‘pearl necklace’ pattern of RadA hexamers, which appear arranged on their side (Fig. 4f). In the absence of DNA, RadA displays random orientations (Supplementary Fig. 2a). A similar pattern was previously reported for the Gp4 helicase by negative stain EM and interpreted as reflecting ssDNA encircled by hexameric rings32. Hence, the ‘pearl necklace’ pattern is specific to the interaction between RadA and ssDNA, most probably resulting from the encircling of the hexamer around the ssDNA template.
In electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSAs), RadA was seen to interact stably with short fluorescent linear ssDNA molecules, as well as dsDNA molecules, with a slight preference for ssDNA and with higher affinity in the absence of ATP (Supplementary Fig. 5a). Addition of competitor ssDNA to a preformed nucleo-protein complex displaced pre-bound RadA, demonstrating the dynamic nature of the RadA–ssDNA interaction (Supplementary Fig. 5b). The RadAC27A and RadAK101A mutants exhibited DNA binding activity similar to that of wild type, whereas the RadAK251A and RadAR253A mutants bound only minimally to ssDNA (Supplementary Fig. 5c,d). These results suggest that stable binding of RadA to DNA relies on an ATP-independent protein conformation. ATP binding and hydrolysis appears to switch RadA to another conformation, relocalizing the KNRFG motif for ATP hydrolysis and resulting in either efficient translocation of RadA along ssDNA or RadA release from dsDNA. Hence, in addition to defining the arginine finger of the ATPase domain shared between two adjacent H protomers, the KNRFG motif may act as a DNA sensor motif, or be structurally linked to it.
The expression levels of the strains possessing the four radA point mutants (RadAC27A, RadAK101A, RadAK251A or RadAR253A) were comparable to wild-type RadA expression levels in competent cells (Supplementary Fig. 1e). All, but the RadAK101A mutant, exhibited a reduced transformation frequency, identical to the radA− strain. In the RadAK101A mutant, GT was ∼5-fold higher level than a radA− mutant and ∼20-fold lower than the wild-type strain (Supplementary Fig. 1a). Interestingly, the RadAK101A mutant was found to exhibit low ssDNA-dependent ATPase activity in vitro (Fig. 4b and Supplementary Fig. 4c). Altogether, these findings highlight the importance of the ATPase activity of RadA for HR during GT. Importantly, they also point to a key role of the C4 domain of RadA in GT, distinct from the ATPase and helicase functions of RadA.
Interplay between RecA and RadA at three-way DNA junctions
The finding that RadA is a hexameric helicase raises the question of the mechanism through which RadA promotes the extension of ssDNA incorporation during HR. To this end, we investigated the interaction of RadA with RecA and with branched DNA substrates that reflect the RecA-driven DNA strand exchange products.
We confirmed by a bacterial two-hybrid (BacTH) assay that RecA and RadA oligomerize (Supplementary Fig. 6a) and that they physically interact with each other (Fig. 5a). The RadAC27A mutant exhibits an attenuated interaction with RecA (Supplementary Fig. 6b) that could lead to the GT defect observed (Supplementary Fig. 1a).
In parallel, we studied the helicase activity of RadA on 3-way DNA junctions (3-J) mimicking those at the boundaries of the RecA-driven D-loop (Fig. 5b). We assembled two synthetic 3-J substrates, one with a 5′ ssDNA arm of 30 nt and a 3′ ssDNA arm of 70 nt (3-J1), and one with a 5′ ssDNA arm of 70 nt and a 3′ ssDNA arm of 30 nt (3-J2; Fig. 5c). One strand of these 3-J substrates was fluorescently labelled, to enable tracing of their unwinding by acrylamide gel electrophoresis (Fig. 5c and Supplementary Fig. 6d). The labelled S1 molecule is the main product generated from 3-J1 (Fig. 5d), while the F2b molecule is the main product from 3-J2 (Fig. 5e), in a RadA dose-dependent manner. Thus, RadA preferentially unwinds the 5′ ssDNA arm of both 3-J substrates. The level of unwinding of the 3-J substrates in the ‘3′ direction’ (named considering the polarity of the invading strand on the D-loop; Fig. 5b) is higher for 3-J2 than for 3-J1. This is possibly because the length of the dsDNA arm to unwind is shorter for 3-J2 (30 versus 70 bp), or because its longer 5′ ssDNA arm favours initial RadA loading. Helicase assays comparing unwinding efficiency of RadA targeting a 30 bp and a 70 bp duplex associated to a large circular ssDNA molecule strongly support the latter possibility (Supplementary Fig. 4d).
At the highest RadA concentrations, the labelled S2 molecule is also observed, which could result from F2b unwinding. In addition, a very low-level of unwinding in the opposite ‘5′ direction’ (Fig. 5b) was detected for both substrates resulting in F1a from 3-J1 and F2a from 3-J2 (Fig. 5d,e).
We next reproduced the helicase assays performed at the highest RadA concentration in the presence of purified pneumococcal RecA (Fig. 5f,g). Remarkably, RecA promoted unwinding of the 3-J substrates in the 5′ direction. This result suggested that RecA facilitates RadA loading on the bottom ssDNA strand at the junction of the 3-J molecules, thereby orienting RadA-driven ssDNA translocation and dsDNA unwinding in the 5′ direction. Notably, at the highest RecA concentration tested on 3-J1, the level of unwinding in the 5′ direction was greater than in the 3′ direction (Fig. 5f). In addition, 3′ direction unwinding was reduced relative to that seen with RadA alone (Fig. 5f,g). This indicates that RecA impeded RadA action on the 5′ ssDNA strand, possibly by competitive binding to this strand. Strongly supporting this proposal, helicase activity of RadA on a 5′ tailed duplex was gradually decreased by increasing amounts of RecA (Supplementary Fig. 6e, right panel). The same experiment reproduced on a reciprocal 3′ tailed duplex did not lead to its unwinding (Supplementary Fig. 6e), showing that RecA did not act on RadA to reverse its translocation and unwinding polarity. Therefore, this experiment further supports the notion that RecA promotes RadA loading on the bottom strand of the 3-J substrates to promote their unwinding in the 5′ direction.
Interestingly, RecA-mediated and RadA-dependent unwinding of the 3-J1 substrate in the 5′ direction was found to depend not only on the ATPase activity of RadA (Supplementary Fig. 6f), but also on that of RecA, as shown using the ATPase domain mutant RecAK85A (Fig. 5h) that still interacts with RadA in the BacTH assay (Supplementary Fig. 6b). This suggests that RecA polymerizes on ssDNA to assist the loading of RadA on the bottom strand of the 3-J substrate. Finally, we tested the RadAC27A mutant, which is hindered in its interaction with RecA (Supplementary Fig. 6c) but retains wild type levels of ATPase and helicase activity (Fig. 4b,c and Supplementary Fig. 4c). Importantly, this mutant unwound 3-J1 in the 3′ but not in the 5′ direction, even in the presence of RecA (Fig. 5i).
These results demonstrate that RadA alone unwinds synthetic 3-J molecules mainly in the 3′ direction, but depends on the interaction with RecA for 5′ direction unwinding. The C4 domain is crucial for this functional interaction of RadA with RecA. Placing this RadA-dependent remodelling of 3-J structures at the boundaries of a RecA-created D-loop would result in unwinding of the parental dsDNA in both directions, the primary step of DNA branch migration.
We report here a detailed structural and functional analysis of the RadA protein from S. pneumoniae, which uncovers several key properties of this HR effector encoded in nearly all bacterial species and in some eukaryotes (Supplementary Fig. 7a). First, purified pneumococcal RadA self-assembles into an annular hexamer in solution. Second, its central RecA-like domain is a close structural paralogue of the helicase domain of DnaB-related SF4 helicases, which form a well-defined family of ring-shaped hexameric motors of bacterial replication forks, all unwinding dsDNA by translocating around the lagging ssDNA template.
Third, RadA is an active helicase, sharing several mechanistic similarities with DnaB. Both RadA and DnaB induce their ATPase activity in the presence of ssDNA and, fuelled by ATP hydrolysis, they catalyse dsDNA unwinding of forked DNA molecules in the 5′ to 3′ direction. On synthetic three-way DNA junctions (3-J) that mimic the boundaries of a D-loop, RadA has been found to unwind the 5′ tailed moiety of the branched DNA molecules. This reaction reflects the unwinding of the parental duplex DNA that should occur on one side of an HR D-loop, which corresponds to the 3′ direction of the invading homologous ssDNA. Fourth, we found that RadA interacts with RecA, and that this interaction promotes the unwinding of the second moiety of 3-J molecules, corresponding on a D-loop to the 5′ direction of the invading homologous ssDNA. These results imply that RadA can promote DNA branch migration of RecA-driven HR D-loops in both directions. They also explain the crucial requirement for RadA in the HR pathway of genetic transformation to promote the efficient incorporation of point mutations.
Bacterial RadA is a novel member of the superfamily 4 (SF4), thus, SF4 helicases are not restrictively involved in DNA replication but could also be specialized for acting in HR.
Nevertheless, RadA differs from DnaB helicases at several levels. The helicase domain of DnaB proteins is characterized by five canonical motifs, which are not all strictly conserved in RadA (Supplementary Fig. 7b). Conversely, RadA proteins present a functionally important KNRFG signature, which is not found in other SF4 members18.
A feature that also markedly distinguishes RadA from other SF4 proteins is the presence of an additional and conserved C-terminal domain adjacent to the helicase domain, structurally similar to the protease domain of Lon proteases. The structure of pneumococcal RadA shows that its P domain forms a stable scaffold to assemble the helicase central motor in the full-length hexamer. By referring to the known orientation of the DnaB motor encircling ssDNA, we infer that the RadA P domain moves at the front of the hexamer in the 5′ to 3′ direction, at the branched DNA junctions of the D-loop to promote dsDNA unwinding. The internal diameter of the P domain (15 Å) can accommodate ssDNA but not dsDNA. This would provide RadA the capability to unwind 5′ tailed dsDNA as efficiently as forked DNA (Fig. 4e), by contrast to DnaB that is restrictively active on forked DNA templates30. In addition, the stability provided by the robust self-association of RadA P domain into a hexameric ring allows RadA to promote incorporation into the genome of transforming ssDNA over long distances.
Finally, another difference between RadA and DnaB proteins is the nature and precise function of their N-terminal domain linked to their helicase domain. In DnaB, this domain is defined as a collar that recruits the primase at the replication fork33. The N-terminal domain of RadA is formed of a C4 zinc binding motif, conserved among RadA proteins, separated from the central helicase domain by a non-conserved linker of various length (Fig. 2a). The presence of 4 cysteines in the C4 domain is required for the interaction of RadA with RecA and its oriented loading on 3-J DNA molecules. Thus, the N-terminal domains of RadA and DnaB determine their specific partnership and their distinct biological functions.
The functional and structural properties of RadA collectively support an original model of DNA branch migration driving the extension of ssDNA invasion during HR. This mechanism is based on the coordinated actions of RecA and RadA, in three successive ATP-dependent steps (Fig. 6a): Initially RecA assembles as a filament on ssDNA and catalyses strand invasion within an homologous duplex DNA (step i); via its interaction with RecA, RadA favourably gains access to both strands of the recipient dsDNA (step ii); once loaded on those two ssDNA templates, RadA translocates away from the D-loop and further unwinds the recipient dsDNA. The invading donor ssDNA is thus able to pair with the complementary strand exposed by RadA, which couples dsDNA unwinding and rewinding in a coordinated manner. By promoting DNA migration in such a way, RadA efficiently relays RecA on the 3′ side of the HR product. This stimulatory effect toward the 3′ end of the donor ssDNA on RecA-directed recombination was reported for RadA in E. coli in an in vitro assay18. Importantly, RadA will act similarly and symmetrically on the 5′ side of the D-loop, where RecA is unable to incorporate the complementary invading strand from the heteroduplex intermediate. RadA maximizes the incorporation of homologous internalized ssDNA molecules into the genome over long distances in both 5′ and 3′ directions.
Interestingly, this ATP-dependent RecA-mediated dual loading of RadA on an HR D-loop closely parallels the ATP-dependent DnaA-mediated dual loading of the replicative helicase DnaB at the replication origin of bacterial chromosomes, oriC34 (Fig. 6b). Through their divergent translocation along ssDNA coupled to dsDNA unwinding, both DnaB and RadA extend the DNA bubble onto which they have been dually loaded. In both cases, their activity promotes ssDNA incorporation into the genome, via replication for DnaB and via HR for RadA.
Along with RuvB and RecG, RadA emerges as a third translocase/helicase promoting DNA branch migration in bacterial HR. RuvB and RecG differ from RadA in two major aspects. First, both translocate along dsDNA, RecG as a monomer on dsDNA and RuvB as a hexameric ring encircling dsDNA; by contrast, RadA moves along ssDNA as a hexamer. Second, they interact with different partners that target them to distinct branched DNA substrates: RuvB with RuvA, to form the RuvAB complex acting at Holliday junctions9; RecG with SSB at branched DNA substrates harbouring ssDNA10; RadA with RecA at 3-J substrates, as found in this study. An important perspective will be to elucidate how the ssDNA translocating and dsDNA unwinding activities of RadA are coordinated with the dsDNA rewinding reaction that occurs at the edges of the D-loop for extending ssDNA invasion.
In conclusion, the role of RadA that our results reveal, to expand incorporation of invading ssDNA into the recipient genome bidirectionally at HR D-loops, raises the question of how generally this role is played in the genome maintenance HR pathways to which it participates. Future work will address this key issue, the structural and functional analysis reported here for RadA from S. pneumoniae providing an important mechanistic framework for conducting such an analysis.
S. pneumoniae transformation assays
Stock cultures were routinely grown at 37 °C in Todd–Hewitt medium+0.5% Yeast extract (THY) or C+Y medium to OD550 0.4; after addition of 15% (vol/vol) glycerol, stocks were kept frozen at −80 °C. Pre-competent wild type cultures grown at 37 °C in C+Y medium to OD550 0.1 were incubated with 50 ng ml−1 synthetic competence stimulating peptide (CSP) for 7 min at 37 °C to induce competence. DNA (concentrations indicated on figures) was then added followed by 20 min incubation at 30 °C. Transformants were selected by plating on 10 ml CAT-agar supplemented with 4% (vol/vol) horse blood, followed by selection using a 10 ml overlay of CAT-agar containing selective antibiotic, after phenotypic expression for 120 min at 37 °C. Depending on the donor DNA, the selective antibiotic was rifampicin (Rif; 2 μg ml−1), novobiocin (Nov; 4 μg ml−1) or streptomycin (Sm; 200 μg ml−1). Approximately 4,000 bp PCR fragments were amplified from strain R304 chromosomal DNA35 with a mutation (M) either at the middle (PCRc) or near the end (PCRe) of the DNA fragment (Supplementary Table 1). PCR transformation experiments were performed with independent amplifications leading to variability in transformation frequencies observed. Nevertheless, the order of magnitude of the PCRc/PCRe ratios remained comparable between each experiment.
Bacterial two-hybrid assay (BacTH)
A modified protocol of the adenylate cyclase-based bacterial two-hybrid technique was used36. Briefly, the isolated T18 and T25 catalytic domains of the Bordetella adenylate cyclase were fused to the N and C-termini of the proteins to be tested. After transformation of the two plasmids producing the complementary fusion proteins into the reporter BTH101 strain, plates were incubated at 37 °C overnight. One or more colonies for each transformation were inoculated into 3 ml of LB medium supplemented with ampicillin and kanamycin to O.D600 0.6. 2 μl of each culture were dropped onto LB plates supplemented with ampicillin, kanamycin, streptomycin, 1 mM IPTG and 10% X-Gal and incubated for 24 h at 25 °C. Each transformation was done at least in triplicate and a representative result is shown.
Recombinant plasmids expressing pneumococcal RadA and RecA proteins in E. coli were obtained after cloning of radA and recA sequences from the genome of pneumococcal R800 derivative strain into pET21d and pKHS (a pET28 derivative)37 respectively to obtain pET-radA and pKHS-recA vectors. radAΔC4 and radAP were cloned by FastCloning38 into the IBA13 plasmid in frame with a thrombin cleavable StrepII tag.
In vitro site-directed mutagenesis
All the point mutations in radA (radAC27A, K101A, K251A, R253A) and recA (recAK85A) were introduced by site-directed mutagenesis PCR on the recombinant plasmids, pET-radA and pKHS-recA accordingly. We used an adapted protocol from the Stratagene ‘QuickChange’ with only one mutator primer carrying the modified sequence for each mutation (Supplementary Table 1), and with both the Pfu turbo polymerase (Stratagene) and the TAQ ligase (New England Biolabs) in the PCR reaction.
radA mutagenesis in S. pneumoniae
Point mutations of RadA were introduced at the native radA locus in R1818 by using pET-radAK101A, pET-radAK251A and pET-radAR253A plasmids as transforming donor DNA. Pre-competent cultures (1.9–3.7 × 108 cfu ml−1) grown at 37 °C in C+Y medium to OD550 0.1 were incubated with 50 ng ml−1 synthetic competence stimulating peptide (CSP) for 7 min at 37 °C to induce competence. About 10 ng ml−1 mutant plasmids were added, followed by 20 min incubation at 30 °C. Fourteen volumes of C+Y medium were added followed by 2 h incubation at 37 °C. Approximately 100 μl cultures were plated on CAT-agar supplemented with 4% (vol/vol) horse blood. For each mutant, clones were screened by PCR on liquid cultures.
The radAC27A mutant was constructed using SOEing PCRs: PCR1 and PCR2 were directly amplified from pneumococcal strain and were used as templates in the final PCR (2 kb) using the outer Olea23 and Olea19 primers (Supplementary Table 1) before transformation of pre-competent R1818 cells.
Immunodetection of RadA by western blot
Uncropped scans of important gels are shown in Supplementary Fig. 9. Approximately 60 μl pre-competent cultures grown at 37 °C in C+Y medium to OD550 0.1 were incubated with 25 ng ml−1 synthetic competence stimulating peptide (CSP) for 7 min at 37 °C to induce competence. Cultures were centrifuged 5 min at 5,000 g 4 °C, supernatants were discarded and pellets were stored 12 h at −80 °C. Pellets were resuspended with 50 μl buffer (TE 1X and 0.01 Doc) and heated 5 min at 80 °C with loading buffer. 10 μl extracts were then loaded on SDS-PAGE precast 4–20% gels (Mini-PROTEAN TGX gel, Bio-Rad) followed by electrophoresis at 180 V for 35 min in 1X TGS buffer. After migration, proteins were transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane (Mini Nitrocellulose Transfer Packs, Bio-Rad) with the trans-Blot Turbo Transfer System (Bio-Rad). The nitrocellulose membrane was then cut above the 17 kDa marker band. The top part of the membrane was probed with anti-RadA antibodies (1:1,000) and the bottom part with anti-SsbB (1:5,000). Both primary antibodies were raised in rabbit (Eurogentec) from purified protein.
Protein expression and purification
All the S. pneumoniae proteins were expressed in E. coli BL21-Rosetta(DE3)-pLysS (CmR) cells (Novagen) and were purified following different procedures according to the type of experiment. In both strategies, proteins were over-expressed in E. coli and purified as soluble proteins.
Purification procedures for analysis of RadA and RecA
RadA, RecA and all derivatives were purified as native proteins, without any tag. Expression clones containing recombinant pET-radA (AmpR), pKHS-recA (KanR) and all derivatives were grown at 37 °C 1 l LB/Cm (10 μg ml−1)/Amp (100 μg ml−1) or Kan (50 μg ml−1) medium until the OD600 reached 0.7. Recombinant protein expression was then induced by adding 0.5 mM IPTG followed by growth at 37 °C for 4 h for RadA proteins and 2 h for RecA proteins. Cells were collected by centrifugation, resuspended in sucrose buffer (25 mM Tris–Cl pH 8, 25% sucrose, 1 mM EDTA, 200 μg ml−1 lysozyme) before liquid nitrogen freezing. Cell pellets were next thawed overnight on ice and suspensions were clarified by ultracentrifugation (Ti50.2 rotor, at 146,542 g 4 °C for 1h30). For RadA proteins, the clarified supernatant was further fractionated by two successive transient precipitations with ammonium sulfate (55% and then 35%). Pellet was re-solubilised and dialysed in 50 mM Tris–Cl pH 8, 100 mM NaCl, 5% glycerol before further purification by FPLC (Äkta purifier-10, GE Healthcare) with a Hi-Trap Q HP 1 ml column followed by a Hi-Trap heparin HP 1 ml column (GE Healthcare). Both columns were equilibrated in 100 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris–Cl pH 8, 5% glycerol, washed after proteins loading with 150–200 mM NaCl, and RadA eluted with a linear gradient of 0.2 to 1 M NaCl. The final fractions of RadA proteins were stored at −20 °C in 300 mM NaCl, 25 mM Tris–Cl pH 8, 45% glycerol, 1 mM TCEP (Tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine)-HCl pH 7. Further analysis of RadA oligomerization was performed by gel filtration. Purified RadA wild type or mutant proteins were sequentially injected and separated on a Superdex 200 increase 10/300 analytical sizing column (GE healthcare) equilibrated with 25 mM Tris pH 8, 200 mM NaCl, 20% glycerol. The column was calibrated with 43, 158 and 440 kDa standard proteins (Ovalbumine, Aldolase and Ferritine respectively) in the same buffer (Supplementary Fig. 4b). For RecA proteins, the clarified supernatant was transiently precipitated by addition of 0.1% Polymin P. After several washes at 200 mM NaCl, 20 mM Tris–Cl pH 7.6, 0.5 mM TCEP, the protein fractions containing RecA were resolubilized in 20 mM Tris–Cl pH 7.6, 1 M NaCl, 0.5 mM TCEP. The protein solution was then mixed with 0.23 g ml−1 ammonium sulfate and stirred for 30 min at 4 °C. After centrifugation in a JA.20 rotor, at 12,000 g for 10 min at 4 °C, the supernatant containing RecA was consecutively loaded on Phenyl, Heparin and Q columns (HiTrap columns, GE Healthcare) and purified by FPLC. RecA proteins were stored at −20 °C in 300 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris-Cl pH 7.6, 45% glycerol, 1 mM TCEP. The concentrations of the purified wild type and mutant proteins were determined by ultraviolet absorbance, Bradford assay, SDS–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS–PAGE) and coomassie staining analysis (Supplementary Fig. 4a).
RadA purification for structural analysis
The pET-radA and IBA13-radA plasmids were transformed in E. coli BL21-Rosetta(DE3), and grown at 37 °C in Terrific Broth (TB). At an O.D600 of 0.8, protein expression was induced either with 1 mM IPTG or 2 μg ml−1 AHT (IBA) respectively and cells were grown overnight at 16 °C. Cells were harvested by centrifugation and frozen in liquid nitrogen. Cells were resuspended in Lysis buffer containing 50 mM HEPES pH 8, 1 mM DNase, 2.5 mM MgCl2 and protease inhibitors (Roche), and lysed by Emulsiflex at 15,000 psi three times. The StrepII-RadA proteins were purified by using a StrepTrap column (GE healthcare). Proteins were eluted from the column with 2.5 mM desthiobiotin and subsequently loaded on and eluted from a Superdex 200 (GE healthcare), equilibrated and run with 50 mM Tris pH 8, 150 mM NaCl and 5 mM MgCl2. Selenium labelled proteins were transformed in T7 Express Crystal cells (New England Biolabs) and grown in SelenoMet Medium (Molecular Dimensions) and induced at O.D600 0.6.
Analysis of RadA molecular mass
To determine the molecular mass of RadAFL and RadAP, multi-angle light scattering (MALS, DAWN HELEOS II, Wyatt Technology) measurements combined with refractive index detection (Optilab t-rEX, Wyatt Technology) were performed39. The samples at a concentration of 2 mg ml−1 were injected onto a Superdex200 Increase (GE healthcare) coupled to a MALS detector. The flow rate was set to 0.4 ml min−1 with an injection volume of 50 μl and the refractive index signal was collected at 298 K.
X-ray fluorescence analysis
The X-ray fluorescence (XRF) analysis was performed on beamline ID30-B at the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility using a Rontec Silicon drift diode XRF detector.
RadA proteins were concentrated in Amicon Ultra centrifugal filters to above 3 mg ml−1. Crystallization trials were performed using the sitting drop vapour diffusion method at 18 °C using a 200 nl dispensing robot (Mosquito). Several conditions were obtained that induced the crystallization of the full-length and truncated proteins. RadAP crystallized best in 9–12% PEG4000 and 100 mM Tris with 30% EG used as a cryoprotectant for flash freezing at 100 K. Crystals appeared within a few hours but were left on the plate for at least a week before harvesting. RadAFL crystallized in 200 mM magnesium formate, 100 mM HEPES pH 8 and 5% glycerol with the final concentration of glycerol being 20% for flash freezing of the crystals.
Data sets for the native and SeMet were collected at 0.9796 Å on Proxima-1 beamline at the SOLEIL synchrotron facility equipped with a Pilatus detector. RadAP crystals belong to the R3 space group and contain two monomers per asymmetric unit. Data processing was done with XDS40 and XSCALE41, and scalepack in the ccp4 suite of programs was used to export the scaled data42. HySS was used to find the sites by single anomalous dispersion (SAD) of the Selenium atoms using 3.5 Å as the highest resolution and autosol was used to obtain an initial model automatically, both from the Phenix suite of programs43. The dataset of a native crystal was solved by molecular replacement (MR) using Phaser44 to a resolution of 2.5 Å. Refinement of the selenium and the native datasets were performed using phenix.refine followed by rounds of manual model building with Coot45. The RadAFL crystals diffracted at best to 3.5 Å and belong to the I222 space group. Five datasets were collected from one crystal of Selenium-containing RadAFL and merged together using XDS41 and XSCALE41. The protease domain structure was used for MR in Phaser44 from the ccp4 suite42 and gave a partial solution. The RecA ATPase domain was used as the second ensemble in the MR search after the placement of the protease domain. The model was built manually using Coot and an alignment file of RecA and RadA was used to assign amino acids. To improve the Rfree, the SAD Selenium sites were located using ShelxD46 and input in Phaser44 to refine the preliminary model. Several rounds of refinement with NCS constraints with Buster47, phenix_rosetta.refine48 and refmac5 (ref. 49) (with jelly body and ProSMART activated) followed by manual building by Coot were required. Validation of the structures was performed by using Molprobity50. The figures of the structures were obtained with Chimera51 and Coot45. The RadAΔC4 protein crystallized with a space group I121, in 16% PEG4000, 200 mM Na Acetate, 100 mM Tris pH 8.5 and was frozen in the reservoir buffer supplemented with 30% EG. The data were processed by XDS40 and XSCALE41 and the crystal packing was obtained using the full-length trimer as a model for molecular replacement. A quick refinement was performed with refmac5 (ref. 49) to confirm the molecular replacement solution was correct.
StrepII tagged RadA (∼0.04 mg ml−1) in 50 mM KCl, 0.5 mM DTT, 10 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.5, 2 mM MgAc, 2 mM ATPγS was incubated at 37 °C for 30 min with 75 ng ssDNA from the M13mp18 lac phage (NEB). Four microliters of DNA-bound or free RadA (∼0.01 mg ml−1) were adsorbed to glow-discharged carbon-coated copper grids (EMS) for 1 min, blotted, and stained with 2% uranyl acetate. The grids were imaged on a Tecnai T12 (FEI) equipped with an Ultrascan camera.
A coupled spectrophotometric enzyme assay was used to measure the ATPase activities of RadA wild type and mutants as follows52,53. The regeneration of ATP from phosphoenolpyruvate and ADP, coupled to the oxidation of NADH, was observed as a decrease in absorbance at 340 nm. 600 nM of wild type or mutants RadA proteins, ATP (ranging from 0 to 2 mM) and 2 μM nucleotides (ssDNA phiX174; Biolabs) or 4 μM nucleotides (dsDNA phiX174-RF1; Biolabs) were used to initiate the reactions.
The ATPase assays were carried out on 96-well plates at 37 °C with a Thermo Scientific Varioskan Flash spectral scanning multimode reader. The reactions were carried out in a buffer containing 10 mM Tris–Cl pH 7.5, 4 mM Mg(OAc)2, 0.1 mM DTT, 1 mM phosphoenolpyruvate, 0.1 mg ml−1 NADH, 100 unit ml−1 pyruvate kinase, 10 unit ml−1 L-lactic dehydrogenase. The NADH extinction coefficient at 340 nm of 6.22 mM−1 cm−1 was used to convert the amount of NADH oxidized to the amount of ATP hydrolysed. The graph and table were constructed using a Michaelis–Menten model on three experiments with Prism-GraphPad 7 software. Best-fit and standard error values are presented on Supplementary Fig. 4c.
DNA substrates for helicase assays
DNA substrates were generated by using synthetic oligonucleotides and/or long circular ssDNA M13mp18 (Biolabs) (Supplementary Table 1 and Supplementary Fig. 8). Equimolar concentrations of 2 or 3 complementary ssDNA molecules were mixed in annealing buffer (20 mM Tris–Cl pH 7.6, 100 mM NaCl, 10 mM Mg(OAc)2, 1 mM DTT), heated for 5 min at 100 °C, placed in boiling water and allowed to cool to room temperature. The schematic representation of the structures and their migration profiles on 4% acrylamide (29:1)/0.3 X TBE gel are shown in Supplementary Fig. 6d. One strand of the various DNA structures was labelled with a Cy3 fluorochrome at the 5′ or at the 3′ end in order to be further detected by a fluor imager (Typhoon Trio, Fuji-GE Heathlcare) with an Abs/Em of 532/580 nm.
Increasing amounts of RadA (80–750 nM) were incubated 15 min at 37 °C with 10 nM of various short Cy3 labelled DNA substrates (Supplementary Fig. 8) in 10 μl solutions containing 10 mM Tris–Cl pH 7.5, 0.1 mg ml−1 BSA, 8% glycerol, 1 mM DTT, 50 mM NaCl, 10 mM Mg(OAc)2 and 5 mM ATP. In order to quench the reaction and to deproteinize the DNA, 0.1% SDS and 1 mM EDTA were added to the reaction for 5 min at 37 °C before loading on 4% acrylamide (29:1)/0.3 × TBE gels. Cy3 labelled oligonucleotides were detected with the Typhoon Trio imager.
In the presence of both RecA and RadA proteins, 150–900 nM of RecA (wild type or mutant) and 750 nM of RadA (wild type or mutants) were added simultaneously to the reactions.
For the helicase assays performed with long circular ssM13mp18 substrates (Supplementary Fig. 8), 0.5–2 μM of wild-type and mutant RadA were incubated 15 min at 37 °C with about 6 nM DNA substrate in 5 μl reactions. After deproteinization, 0.5 μl of buffer (xylene cyanol, glycerol 50%) were added to the reactions before loading on 1.2% agarose/TAE 1 × gel. The fluorescence detection was managed, as described above.
Quantification of helicase products
The DNA products in % of total DNA have been quantified by using the Multigauge software. The experiment performed without any protein has been retracted to each experiment. The % of helicase products relative to the initial structures reported below the gels. Helicase assays were performed at least twice independently and led to reproducible results. In particular, experiments performed with wild-type proteins on the two 3-J substrates were reproduced between three and five times and resulted in the same ratio of products at the protein concentrations tested. Experiments performed with RecA and RadA point mutants were done at least twice independently. One typical experiment is presented in each case. Importantly, we used at least two distinct purified native protein preparations to certify the reproducibility of the experiments.
DNA binding assay on ssDNA and dsDNA
Increasing amounts of RadA (50–750 nM) were incubated 15 min at 37 °C with 10 nM of Cy3 labelled DNA (100-mer) and either ssDNA or dsDNA (S or D structures in Supplementary Fig. 8) in a 10 μl reaction solution containing 50 mM Tris–Cl pH 7.5, 0.1 mg ml−1 BSA, 8% glycerol, 1 mM DTT, 100 mM NaCl, 10 mM Mg(OAc)2, with or without 5 mM ATP (GE Healthcare). Samples were loaded on a 4% acrylamide (29:1)/0.3 × TBE gel and submitted to electrophoresis≈10 V cm−1 for 1 h in 0.3 × TBE buffer. Free DNA and nucleoprotein complexes were then directly detected on the gel using the Typhoon Trio (Supplementary Fig. 5). In parallel, the binding profiles of RadA, RadAK251A and RadAR253A (150–600 nM) were also tested with 10 nM of γ33 P- labelled oligonucleotide (100-mer) in the same reaction conditions, as previously described. After electrophoresis, the gel was dried and radioactivity detected with a phosphorimager.
The competition experiment in Supplementary Fig. 5b was conducted with 750 nM RadA incubated 15 min at 37 °C with 10 nM Ovio10-Cy3 in a reaction containing 10 mM Tris–Cl pH 7.5, 0.1 mg ml−1 BSA, 8% glycerol, about 50 mM NaCl and 10 mM Mg(OAc)2. At the same time as Ovio10-Cy3 or 10 min later, 5, 10 or 20 nM of Ovio8-Cy5 were added to the reaction and incubated 10 min. The solutions were then loaded on a 4% acrylamide (29:1)/0.3 × TBE gel and submitted to electrophoresis as previously described. The fluorescent DNAs were then visualized with Typhoon Trio with Abs/Em of 532/580 nm (Cy3) and 633/670 nm (Cy5).
All data within the article and its Supplementary Information files are available from the authors.
Coordinates and structure factors have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank under accession numbers 5LKM and 5LKQ for RadAFL and RadAP respectively.
R.F., P.P. and C.R. designed the experiments. L.M. and M.B. constructed the pneumococcal strains and performed the transformation experiments. L.M., V.M. and C.R. assisted by C.G. and A.-L.S. purified recombinant RadA derivatives. L.M. and V.M. performed RadA ATPase and helicase assays, and EMSA analysis. C.R. performed all the structural analyses assisted for the crystallography by H.R. C.R. assisted by T.P. performed the Bacterial Two-hybrid study. C.R. performed the molecular mass determination by MALS. P.P., R.F, C.R. and L.M. wrote the manuscript with contributions of V.M. and M.B.
How to cite this article: Marie, L. et al. Bacterial RadA is a DnaB-type helicase interacting with RecA to promote bidirectional D-loop extension. Nat. Commun. 8, 15638 doi: 10.1038/ncomms15638 (2017).
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Levy, S. B. & Marshall, B. Antibacterial resistance worldwide: causes, challenges and responses. Nat. Med. 10, S122–S129 (2004).
Silver, L. L. Challenges of antibacterial discovery. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 24, 71–109 (2011).
Mera, R. M., Miller, L. A., Daniels, J. J. D., Weil, J. G. & White, A. R. Increasing prevalence of multidrug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae in the United States over a 10-year period: Alexander Project. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 51, 195–200 (2005).
Bell, J. C. & Kowalczykowski, S. C. RecA: regulation and mechanism of a molecular search engine. Trends Biochem. Sci. 41, 491–507 (2016).
Morrical, S. W. DNA-pairing and annealing processes in homologous recombination and homology-directed repair. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 7, a016444 (2015).
Bell, J. C., Plank, J. L., Dombrowski, C. C. & Kowalczykowski, S. C. Direct imaging of RecA nucleation and growth on single molecules of SSB-coated ssDNA. Nature 491, 274–278 (2012).
Gupta, R. C., Golub, E. I., Wold, M. S. & Radding, C. M. Polarity of DNA strand exchange promoted by recombination proteins of the RecA family. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95, 9843–9848 (1998).
Michel, B. & Leach, D. Homologous recombination-enzymes and pathways. EcoSal Plus 5, 1–46 (2012).
West, S. C. Processing of recombination intermediates by the RuvABC proteins. Annu. Rev. Genet. 31, 213–244 (1997).
Bianco, P. R. I came to a fork in the DNA and there was RecG. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 117, 166–173 (2015).
Rudolph, C. J., Upton, A. L., Briggs, G. S. & Lloyd, R. G. Is RecG a general guardian of the bacterial genome? DNA Repair 9, 210–223 (2010).
Beam, C. E., Saveson, C. J. & Lovett, S. T. Role for radA/sms in recombination intermediate processing in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 184, 6836–6844 (2002).
Burghout, P. et al. Search for genes essential for pneumococcal transformation: the RADA DNA repair protein plays a role in genomic recombination of donor DNA. J. Bacteriol. 189, 6540–6550 (2007).
Carrasco, B., Fernández, S., Asai, K., Ogasawara, N. & Alonso, J. C. Effect of the recU suppressors sms and subA on DNA repair and homologous recombination in Bacillus subtilis. Mol. Genet. Genomics 266, 899–906 (2002).
Claverys, J.-P., Prudhomme, M. & Martin, B. Induction of competence regulons as a general response to stress in gram-positive bacteria. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 60, 451–475 (2006).
Johnston, C., Martin, B., Fichant, G., Polard, P. & Claverys, J.-P. Bacterial transformation: distribution, shared mechanisms and divergent control. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 12, 181–196 (2014).
Lovett, S. T. Replication arrest-stimulated recombination: dependence on the RecA paralog, RadA/Sms and translesion polymerase, DinB. DNA Repair 5, 1421–1427 (2006).
Cooper, D. L. & Lovett, S. T. Recombinational branch migration by the RadA/Sms paralog of RecA in Escherichia coli. eLife 5, 1–22 (2016).
Cooper, D. L., Boyle, D. C. & Lovett, S. T. Genetic analysis of Escherichia coli-RadA: functional motifs and genetic interactions. Mol. Microbiol. 95, 769–779 (2015).
Claverys, J.-P., Martin, B. & Polard, P. The genetic transformation machinery: composition, localization, and mechanism. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 33, 643–656 (2009).
Charpentier, X., Polard, P. & Claverys, J.-P. Induction of competence for genetic transformation by antibiotics: convergent evolution of stress responses in distant bacterial species lacking SOS? Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 15, 570–576 (2012).
Prudhomme, M., Attaiech, L., Sanchez, G., Martin, B. & Claverys, J.-P. Antibiotic stress induces genetic transformability in the human pathogen Streptococcus pneumoniae. Science 313, 89–92 (2006).
Slager, J., Kjos, M., Attaiech, L. & Veening, J.-W. Antibiotic-induced replication stress triggers bacterial competence by increasing gene dosage near the origin. Cell 157, 395–406 (2014).
Lyubimov, A. Y., Strycharska, M. & Berger, J. M. The nuts and bolts of ring-translocase structure and mechanism. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 21, 240–248 (2011).
Holm, L. & Rosenström, P. Dali server: conservation mapping in 3D. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, W545–W549 (2010).
Krissinel, E. & Henrick, K. Secondary-structure matching (SSM), a new tool for fast protein structure alignment in three dimensions. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 60, 2256–2268 (2004).
Patel, S. S. & Picha, K. M. Structure and function of hexameric helicases. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 69, 651–697 (2000).
Itsathitphaisarn, O., Wing, R. A., Eliason, W. K., Wang, J. & Steitz, T. A. The hexameric helicase DnaB adopts a nonplanar conformation during translocation. Cell 151, 267–277 (2012).
Botos, I. et al. The catalytic domain of Escherichia coli Lon protease has a unique fold and a Ser-Lys dyad in the active site. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 8140–8148 (2004).
Kaplan, D. L. & O’Donnell, M. DnaB drives DNA branch migration and dislodges proteins while encircling two DNA strands. Mol. Cell 10, 647–657 (2002).
Crampton, D. J., Guo, S., Johnson, D. E. & Richardson, C. C. The arginine finger of bacteriophage T7 gene 4 helicase: role in energy coupling. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 4373–4378 (2004).
Egelman, E. H., Yu, X., Wild, R., Hingorani, M. M. & Patel, S. S. Bacteriophage T7 helicase/primase proteins form rings around single-stranded DNA that suggest a general structure for hexameric helicases. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 92, 3869–3873 (1995).
Strycharska, M. S. et al. Nucleotide and partner-protein control of bacterial replicative helicase structure and function. Mol. Cell 52, 844–854 (2013).
Fang, L., Davey, M. J. & O’Donnell, M. Replisome assembly at oriC, the replication origin of E. coli, reveals an explanation for initiation sites outside an origin. Mol. Cell 4, 541–553 (1999).
Mortier-Barrière, I., de Saizieu, A., Claverys, J. P. & Martin, B. Competence-specific induction of recA is required for full recombination proficiency during transformation in Streptococcus pneumoniae. Mol. Microbiol. 27, 159–170 (1998).
Battesti, A. & Bouveret, E. The bacterial two-hybrid system based on adenylate cyclase reconstitution in Escherichia coli. Methods 58, 325–334 (2012).
Quevillon-Cheruel, S. et al. Structure-function analysis of pneumococcal DprA protein reveals that dimerization is crucial for loading RecA recombinase onto DNA during transformation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, E2466–E2475 (2012).
Li, C. et al. FastCloning: a highly simplified, purification-free, sequence- and ligation-independent PCR cloning method. BMC Biotechnol. 11, 92 (2011).
Sahin, E. & Roberts, C. J. Size-exclusion chromatography with multi-angle light scattering for elucidating protein aggregation mechanisms. Methods Mol. Biol. 899, 403–423 (2012).
Kabsch, W. XDS. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 125–132 (2010).
Kabsch, W. Integration, scaling, space-group assignment and post-refinement. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 133–144 (2010).
Winn, M. D. et al. Overview of the CCP4 suite and current developments. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 67, 235–242 (2011).
Adams, P. D. et al. PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 213–221 (2010).
McCoy, A. J. et al. Phaser crystallographic software. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 40, 658–674 (2007).
Emsley, P., Lohkamp, B., Scott, W. G. & Cowtan, K. Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 486–501 (2010).
Sheldrick, G. M. Experimental phasing with SHELXC/D/E: combining chain tracing with density modification. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 479–485 (2010).
Bricogne, G. et al. BUSTER version 2.10.2 Global Phasing Limited (2016).
Terwilliger, T. C. et al. phenix.mr_rosetta: molecular replacement and model rebuilding with Phenix and Rosetta. J. Struct. Funct. Genomics 13, 81–90 (2012).
Murshudov, G. N., Vagin, A. A. & Dodson, E. J. Refinement of macromolecular structures by the maximum-likelihood method. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 53, 240–255 (1997).
Chen, V. B. et al. MolProbity: all-atom structure validation for macromolecular crystallography. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 12–21 (2010).
Pettersen, E. F. et al. UCSF Chimera–a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 25, 1605–1612 (2004).
Iype, L. E., Wood, E. A., Inman, R. B. & Cox, M. M. RuvA and RuvB proteins facilitate the bypass of heterologous DNA insertions during RecA protein-mediated DNA strand exchange. J. Biol. Chem. 269, 24967–24978 (1994).
Morrical, S. W., Lee, J. & Cox, M. M. Continuous association of Escherichia coli single-stranded DNA binding protein with stable complexes of recA protein and single-stranded DNA. Biochemistry 25, 1482–1494 (1986).
We thank Calum Johnston, Nathalie Campo, Dave Lane and Jean-Yves Bouet for critical reading of the manuscript. This work was funded by the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, University Paul Sabatier, Agence Nationale de la Recherche (grant ANR-10-BLAN-1331) and the European Research Council (MolStructTransfo, 281149). L.M. was supported by a PhD grant from Ministère de la Recherche et de l’Enseignement. We thank Pierre Legrand and tutors at the 2014 Diamond-CCP4 course for advice on data collection, processing and refinement; the staff at Soleil, the ESRF and DLS for beamtime and the platform of Crystallography at the Institut Pasteur for technical support. We thank Annick Dujeancourt and Francesca Gubellini for help with cloning of BacTH constructs.
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
About this article
Nucleic Acids Research (2019)
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2019)
Bacillus subtilis RadA/Sms contributes to chromosomal transformation and DNA repair in concert with RecA and circumvents replicative stress in concert with DisA
DNA Repair (2019)
Nucleic Acids Research (2018)
Infection, Genetics and Evolution (2018)