Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Coupled multiferroic domain switching in the canted conical spin spiral system Mn2GeO4


Despite remarkable progress in developing multifunctional materials, spin-driven ferroelectrics featuring both spontaneous magnetization and electric polarization are still rare. Among such ferromagnetic ferroelectrics are conical spin spiral magnets with a simultaneous reversal of magnetization and electric polarization that is still little understood. Such materials can feature various multiferroic domains that complicates their study. Here we study the multiferroic domains in ferromagnetic ferroelectric Mn2GeO4 using neutron diffraction, and show that it features a double-Q conical magnetic structure that, apart from trivial 180o commensurate magnetic domains, can be described by ferromagnetic and ferroelectric domains only. We show unconventional magnetoelectric couplings such as the magnetic-field-driven reversal of ferroelectric polarization with no change of spin-helicity, and present a phenomenological theory that successfully explains the magnetoelectric coupling. Our measurements establish Mn2GeO4 as a conceptually simple multiferroic in which the magnetic-field-driven flop of conical spin spirals leads to the simultaneous reversal of magnetization and electric polarization.


The nomenclature ‘multiferroics’ has been originally coined for materials showing the coexistence of two or all three ferroic orders (ferroelectric, ferromagnetic and ferroelastic)1,2, and is expanded nowadays to comprise materials showing ferroelectric and antiferromagnetic orders3. Extensive studies in the past decade have led to the discoveries of various new multiferroics in which their magnetic order breaks inversion symmetry and gives rise to ferroelectricity3,4,5,6,7. Among such multiferroics, however, materials showing both spontaneous magnetization M and electric polarization P simultaneously, that is, multiferroics in the original definition, are not common. One of the few systems exhibiting both spontaneous M and P is a spiral magnet with the so-called transverse conical spin structure, which consists of a cycloidal spiral spin component and a ferromagnetic component along the spin rotation axis of the cycloid3,6. This is an example of a so-called multi-Q structure in which two distinct magnetic propagation vectors Q coexist. In the framework of the spin–current or inverse Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya (DM) mechanism8, the cycloidal component induces P in the direction perpendicular to both the spin rotation axis and the modulation wave vector. This means that P in transverse conical systems develops in the direction perpendicular to M. CoCr2O4 (refs 9, 10) and some hexaferrites11,12,13,14,15,16,17 are examples of such conical–spiral multiferroics in which simultaneous reversals of M and P are often observed9,10,12,16. However, the microscopic mechanism for the simultaneous reversal has not been fully understood to date. An important result of the present paper is to show that the phenomenological model we introduce here explains the switching mechanisms we observe in the double-Q conical-spiral multiferroic, Mn2GeO4.

Recently, an olivine-type compound Mn2GeO4 was reported to be a rare multiferroic below 5.5 K, where both spontaneous M and P develop in the same direction18,19. The crystal structure of Mn2GeO4 (Fig. 1a) is described by the orthorhombic Pnma space group. The S=5/2 Mn2+ ions occupy two distinct crystallographic sites (Mn1 and Mn2) octahedrally coordinated by O2− anions, and form sawtooth-like chains along the b axis20. The structure contains competing magnetic interactions, which lead to various magnetic phases and a complex magnetic order in the ground state multiferroic phase18,19,21. A previous neutron scattering study13 proposed a multi-Q magnetic order with both commensurate (C) and incommensurate (IC) components for the multiferroic state. The C component characterized by the propagation vector of (0 0 0) is described by a combination of two irreducible representations (irreps) Γ1 and Γ3 and allows finite M along the c axis (Mc). The IC component forms a spin spiral with the propagation vector Qic=(qh qk 0), where qh=0.136 and qk=0.211. This structure is described by two irreps D1 and D2, and contains a cycloidal component which can be responsible for P along the c axis (Pc). To the best of our knowledge, Mn2GeO4 is the only multiferroic with the M||P configuration where P can be understood as generated by a spiral spin order. Phenomenological symmetry analysis on the respective C and IC components well explained not only the simultaneous appearance of finite |M| and |P| but also the M||P configuration18. However, no clear accessible explanation for the MP coupling has been provided to date. In addition, as shown in Fig. 1b, a reversal of M accompanies that of P in the multiferroic state of Mn2GeO4, indicating a synchronized switching of both ferromagnetic and ferroelectric domains. This coupled switching mechanism still remains an unsolved issue, both microscopically and phenomenologically.

Figure 1: Structures and multiferroicity of Mn2GeO4.

(a) Crystal structure of Mn2GeO4. (b) Magnetization along the c axis (Mc) and electric polarization along c (Pc) as a function of magnetic field applied along c (Bc) at 4.5 K for a single crystal of Mn2GeO4. Before the measurement of Pc, the specimen was cooled from high temperature into the multiferroic phase in positive electric and magnetic fields. The figure is adapted with permission from ref. 18. (c,d) Magnetic structures in the multiferroic state of Mn2GeO4 (the most probable magnetic point group: 2 with 21 axis along c). Two of the possible magnetic domains are illustrated: (c) (CA, QA) domain [+Γ13, (qh qk 0)] and (d) (CB, QB) domain [+Γ1−Γ3, (qh −qk 0)]. Red and blue arrows on cones denote Mn1 and Mn2 moments, respectively. In the magnetic structure, two types of conical spin chains extend along the b axis (conical chains α and β) and are placed alternately in a staggered arrangement.

Here we report on the evolution of these domains in Mn2GeO4 by the application of electric and/or magnetic fields, and reveal one-to-one phenomenological correspondence relations between certain C and Q domains, which arise from the C and IC components in the multi-Q magnetic order, respectively. From this we show that the multiferroic state of Mn2GeO4 can be regarded as canted conical spin spirals, as illustrated in Fig. 1c,d. We demonstrate experimentally that the effective spiral handedness, which is usually controlled by an electric field in magnetic spiral ferroelectrics, couples not only with P but also with M via the C,Q domain switching, and its sign can be reversed by a magnetic field in Mn2GeO4. We also clarify the mechanism of both the M||P configuration and the simultaneous reversal of M and P observed in this unique multiferroic compound.


Consideration of multiferroic domains

To elucidate the coupling mechanism between the ferromagnetism and ferroelectricity in Mn2GeO4, we investigated the effects of electric and magnetic fields on domains by means of unpolarized and polarized neutron scattering measurements on single crystal samples. Both the ferromagnetic and ferroelectric domains in this compound involve several types of magnetic domains, which are ascribed to the complex multi-Q magnetic order with both C and IC components. As illustrated in Supplementary Fig. 1a, the C component can host two pairs of ferromagnetic domains (defined as CA domain for ±Γ1±Γ3 and CB domain for ±Γ1±Γ3). Each C domain possesses its time-reversal counterpart with the opposite sign of Mc (compare upper and lower panels of Supplementary Fig. 1a). On the other hand, as illustrated in Supplementary Fig. 1b, the IC component can host two pairs of ferroelectric domains (defined as QA and QB domains for the propagation vectors (qh qk 0) and (qhqk 0), respectively). Each Q domain possesses its space-inversion counterparts with the opposite sign of Pc (or the opposite sign of spin-helicity h) (compare upper and lower panels of Supplementary Fig. 1b). Thus, the multiferroic state in Mn2GeO4 includes all four types of magnetic domains defined in ref. 22: orientation domains (CA↔CB), time-reversed domains [C(+Mc)↔C(−Mc)], configuration (or Q) domains (QA↔QB) and so-called chirality domains [Q(+h)↔Q(−h)].

Phenomenological coupling theory

First, we present a phenomenological theory that describes the possible coupling terms between the ferroelectric and magnetic order parameters in the multiferroic state of Mn2GeO4 (see Methods). To describe the couplings seven order parameters are identified: ferroelectric order Pz, two complex order parameters and for irreps D1 and D2, respectively, for each IC Q domain, Q=QA or QB (in total four order parameters), and two C order parameters X1 and X3, belonging to irreps Γ1 and Γ3, respectively. and represent the amplitude of the magnetization distribution which transforms according to the irreps D1 and D2 for the space group Pnma and Qic=(qh qk 0) (ref. 18), for example, is even under the glide operation perpendicular to the z axis (mz), and is odd under mz. X1 describes 180° domains of the dominant C antiferromagnetic component while X3 corresponds to the ferromagnetic component with magnetization along the z axis (Mz). Here the z axis corresponds to the c axis in Mn2GeO4. Supplementary Table 1 and Supplementary Note 1 describe the symmetry operations of the space group and the transformation properties of these order parameters, respectively. We construct coupling terms that the reader can check are invariant under these transformation properties by using Supplementary Eqs. 1−7 in Supplementary Note 1, and this leads to three such terms given by

Here s, s′, r, and r′ are real numbers. U describes the coupling between the spin-helicity and the electric polarization, and is equivalent to the trilinear coupling term developed for Ni3V2O8 (ref. 23) and TbMnO3 (ref. 24). The spin-helicity h is defined as , and is of opposite sign for the QA and QB domains. Nevertheless, each Q domain has the same handedness of spin cycloidal component projected onto the bc plane, which induces Pz with the same sign. V describes the coupling between the C domains and the Q domains, and W describes the coupling between the magnetization and the electric polarization. These three coupling terms (U, V and W) define strict relationships between the order parameters. Table 1 lists the relationships between the signs of the respective order parameters achieved after various field cooling conditions. From these couplings, one can anticipate the effects of ferromagnetic and ferroelectric domain switching on the respective order parameters. Importantly, a reversal of X3 (=Mz) allows not only a concomitant reversal of Pz but also a switching between the QA and QB domains. We will provide experimental evidence for the presence of all three coupling terms.

Table 1 Relationships between the signs of order parameters.

Electric-field-cooling effect on spin-helicity

To prove the existence of the U coupling term (equation (1)), we studied the effect of a cooling electric field Ecool on spin-helicity in the Q domains using polarized neutron diffraction (spherical neutron polarimetry (SNP)) at TASP, Paul Scherrer Institut (PSI). Details of the experiments are fully described in Methods. The intensity profiles of the (±2qh 1−qk 0) peaks were measured in both the non-spin-flip (z,x) and spin-flip (z,−x) polarization channels. From the difference in the intensities observed in each polarization channel, the relative proportions of the two helicity domains within each Q domain can be determined directly (see Methods). These measurements were done in zero electric field at 2 K, after having cooled the specimen from 10 to 2 K under various Ecool along the c axis. In Fig. 2a–d we show the wave-vector dependence of the scattering from the QA domain peak (2−qh 1−qk 0) after cooling under Ecool=±0.5 and ±1.5 MV m−1. The results show a strong sensitivity to both the neutron polarization state and size of Ecool, with the difference between the non-spin-flip and spin-flip scattering being larger in the data for Ecool=±1.5 MV m−1. Furthermore, by switching the sign of Ecool the polarization-dependent magnitude of the spin-flip and non-spin-flip intensities becomes reversed. Similar data are also obtained for the QB domain. Importantly, these results show that the Pzx elements of the polarization matrix (see Methods) can be made finite, with both the magnitude and sign tunable by the electric-field-cooling condition. This confirms the magnetic structure in the multiferroic state of Mn2GeO4 to include a spin spiral component with a spin-helicity that can be selected by an electric field.

Figure 2: Electric-field-cooling effect on spin-helicity.

(ad) Polarized neutron scattering as a function of wave-vector transfer along the (0,k,0) wave-vector direction of the (2−qh 1−qk 0) magnetic reflection in the QA domain. The measurements were done at 2 K in the absence of electric field after cooling the specimen from 10 to 2 K at the cooling electric field Ecool=+0.5 (a), −0.5 (b), +1.5 (c) and −1.5 MV m−1 (d) along the c axis. Red circles and blue triangles denote the diffracted intensities of non-spin-flip (z,x) and spin-flip (z,−x) channels, respectively. (e) Fractions of the spin-helicity h domains as a function of Ecool. Red open circles and blue open squares show the fraction of −h domain [p(−h)] in the QA domain and that of +h domain [p(+h)] in the QB domain, respectively. For comparison, the Ecool dependence of Pc is also plotted (grey triangles). Error bars in (e) are defined as the difference between positive and negative polarization matrices.

We measured the spin polarization dependence of the magnetic scattering in more detail by examining the full polarization matrices for various peaks in the QA and QB domains (Methods). Using both the MuFIT program25 and the magnetic structure models reported previously18, we modelled the polarization matrix data to quantitatively determine the fractions of the spin-helicity domains (±h domains) within each of the QA and QB domains, and for various Ecool. Figure 2e shows the h domain fractions (p(−h) and p(+h) in the QA and QB domains, respectively), as a function of Ecool. For comparison, the Ecool dependence of Pc measured in the same condition is also plotted in Fig. 2e. The h domain fraction in each Q domain behaves in the same way, namely increasing in proportion with positive Ecool up to 2 MV m−1 and saturating above 2 MV m−1. The Ecool dependence of the domain fraction matches up nicely with that of Pc. Thus, the QA and QB domains coexist even after the electric-field cooling and contribute to the ferroelectric polarization, with their spin-helicity (or h domain fraction) equivalently tuned by Ecool. These observations, in particular the opposite sign of h in the two domains, are entirely consistent with the presence of the U coupling term. It is also worth pointing out that large Ecool (>2 MV m−1) is required to obtain single spin-helicity in each Q domain. In most spin spiral ferroelectrics in single crystal form, an order of magnitude smaller Ecool is enough to pole specimens (for example, <0.2 MV m−1 in Ni3V2O8 (ref. 26)).

Correlation between the C and Q domains

Next, we show the results of unpolarized neutron scattering measurements done at TriCS, PSI. Note that the unpolarized neutron scattering technique cannot distinguish a pair of time-reversed 180° domains or a pair of helicity domains. From this technique, however, we obtain quantitative information about the orientation domains (CA↔CB) and the configuration domains (QA↔QB)27. In addition, by carefully examining the field-response of the respective domain populations, we also elucidate the correlation between the C and Q domains, that is, the coupling mechanism between ferromagnetism and ferroelectricity. Before the measurements, the specimen was cooled from 10 to 2 K at Ecool=+3 MV m−1 and Bcool=+1.5 T (magnetoelectric (ME) cooling). These cooling fields are large enough to fully pole both the ferromagnetic and ferroelectric domains, which is confirmed by measurements of M and P or by checking the chiral scattering terms of the polarization matrix obtained from SNP experiments (see Figs 1b and 2e). After the ME cooling, both the electric field E and magnetic field B were swept to zero at 2 K, and then we measured integrated intensities of 50 C and 70 IC magnetic peaks. For instance, θ-scan profiles of the (−3 1 0), (−3 −1 0), (−2+qh −1+qk 0) and (−2+qh 1−qk 0) reflections are shown in Fig. 3a–d, respectively (black symbols). Subsequently, B was swept to −1.5 T and then set to zero at 4.5 K. This B-sweeping procedure causes the reversal of M and P. Then the same measurements were done and the integrated intensity data of the same magnetic peaks were obtained again. Red symbols in Fig. 3a–d show the θ-scan profiles of the above-mentioned reflections after the reversal of M and P. By comparing the data before and after the reversal of M and P, it is apparent that the intensities of the (−3 1 0) and (−2+qh −1+qk 0) reflections are suppressed after the reversal while those of the (−3 −1 0) and (−2+qh 1−qk 0) reflections are enhanced. In fact, as shown in Fig. 3e,f, a stepwise change in the integrated intensity of both the C (1 ± 1 0) and the IC (±qh 1+qk 0) magnetic reflections is observed at the magnetic field where the reversal of M and P occurs.

Figure 3: Coupled domain switching induced by a magnetic field.

Data obtained by unpolarized neutron scattering measurements. The θ-scan profiles of (a,b) the commensurate (−3 ±1 0) and (c,d) the incommensurate (−2+qhqk 0) magnetic reflections. The measurements were done at 4.5 K. Black and red closed symbols denote the data measured after the ME cooling and after the reversal of M and P, respectively (see text). For comparison, the data measured after zero-field cooling are also plotted (grey symbols). Error bars are defined as the square root of counts. (e,f) Integrated intensity of the commensurate (1 ±1 0) and the incommensurate (±qh 1+qk 0) magnetic reflections as a function of magnetic field along the c axis, Bc. Pink and blue marks in (e) denote the data of the (1 −1 0) and the (qh 1+qk 0) magnetic reflections, respectively. Pink and blue marks in (f) represent the data of the (1 1 0) and the (−qh 1+qk 0) magnetic reflections, respectively. These data were taken while sweeping a magnetic field from positive to negative Bc.

As described in Methods, refinement of the integrated intensity data and determination of the respective domain fractions were done using both the FullProf program28 and the models proposed in ref. 18. From the analysis, the domain fractions were estimated to be p(CA) : p(CB)=0.60(1) : 0.40(1) and p(QA) : p(QB)=0.600(3) : 0.400(3) before the reversal while those after the reversal were p(CA) : p(CB)=0.33(1) : 0.67(1) and p(QA) : p(QB)=0.371(2) : 0.629(2). Thus, the domain fractions of the CA and CB domains are nearly the same with those of the QA and QB domains, respectively. This result suggests that the C and IC domains are strongly entangled, and that the CA (CB) domain is always coupled with the QA (QB) domain. Furthermore, the domain fraction relationships between the domains A and B are reversed in both the C and Q domains after the reversal of M and P. These coupling features were observed in all the data for various field cooling conditions, as summarized in Supplementary Table 2. This indicates that a domain switching occurs not only between the CA and CB domains but also between QA and QB domains when the simultaneous reversal of M and P takes place. For a given sign of X1, CA and CB domains are distinguished by the sign of X3, and the presence of coupling term V (equation (2)) dictates a coupling of the Q domains with the C domains–consistent with our observations.

Magnetic-field effect on spin-helicity and domain switching

We now show the results obtained by polarized neutron diffraction (PND) measurements at D3, ILL (see Methods). As listed in Table 2, the signs of the G polarization matrix parameters (=, ) for magnetic peaks in the QA and QB domains are opposite to each other after the same ME cooling procedure, and are reversed after B-sweeping, that is, the M reversal accompanied by the P reversal. This switching of the average spin-helicity with magnetic field arises due to a switching of the Q domain populations and not due to the switching of the helicity within a Q domain: it is this change of the Q domains that leads to the observed change of the spin-helicity because the QA and QB domains have opposite helicity according to coupling term U. This leaves the helicity-dependent term in the coupling term W overall invariant, (equation (3)), so that W describes the coupling between ferromagnetic and ferroelectric orders in Mn2GeO4.

Table 2 Spin-helicity and G parameters in polarization matrix.


Based on these experimental results, we conclude that the full magnetic structure in the multiferroic state of Mn2GeO4 is of the double-Q type, being namely a superposition of the CA and QA domains (or the CB and QB domains). This means that only the following eight-types of C, Q domain combinations are possible: [CAMc), QAPc)], [CAMc), QA(Pc)], [CBMc), QBPc)], and [CBMc), QB(Pc)] (the double sign applies in the same order as written). The sign of X1 determines whether M is parallel or antiparallel to P. In Fig. 1c,d we show two of the eight possible double-Q domains. The resulting magnetic structures can be simplified by considering them to include two types of conical spin chain (α and β) formed by Mn1 moments. The simplified structure is illustrated in Fig. 4a,b. In each conical chain, the Mn moments form a cone with the cone axis (|| vector sum of the Mn moments in each chain) making a finite angle with the a, b, and c axes. The coupling between the conical chains α and β is canted antiferromagnetic. Though the net moments along the a and b axes are cancelled out, the c axis component remains finite. As a result, a net magnetization Mnet develops along the c axis, as schematically illustrated in Fig. 4b. Furthermore, each conical chain comprises a cycloidal component which allows a local P in the direction perpendicular to both the component of the propagation vector ||b, and the spin rotation axis through the inverse DM mechanism8. The vector sum of the local P in the conical chains α and β is aligned along the c axis, and a net electric polarization Pnet develops along the c axis (Fig. 4b). Thus, the multiferroic state of Mn2GeO4 can be regarded simply as ‘canted conical spin spirals’ in which magnetically-induced electric polarization develops in the direction parallel to magnetization.

Figure 4: Schematics of coupled multiferroic domain switching.

(a) Simplified conical magnetic structure viewed along the c axis. Red arrows denote conical axes. The structure consists of two-types of conical spin chains extended along the b axis (conical chains α and β). (b) The schematic configurations of local magnetization Mα,β (red arrows) and magnetically-induced electric polarization Pα,β (blue arrows) for each conical chain are illustrated. In each conical chain, Mα,β and Pα,β are aligned in directions parallel and perpendicular to the cone axis, respectively. The coupling between the two types of chains is canted antiferromagnetic, which results in both net magnetization Mnet and electric polarization Pnet along the c axis. (c) Schematic illustrations of coupled multiferroic domain switching by a magnetic field along the c axis, Bc. Blue circular arrows represent the sense of spin spiral, which corresponds to the sign of the spin-helicity h. The application of Bc causes a flop of the cone axis, which leads to coupled multiferroic domain switching.

Now, we turn to the mechanism of the simultaneous reversal of magnetization and electric polarization by applying B along c (Bc) whose sign is opposite to that of Mc. As mentioned above, the results of unpolarized neutron scattering experiments suggest that domain switching occurs between the (CA, QA) and (CB, QB) domains when the reversal of M and P takes place. Schematics of the change in a cone axis upon the reversal of M and P (or domain switching) are illustrated in Fig. 4c. Starting from the (CA(+Mc), QA(+Pc)) domain with positive Mc and Pc (Top left panel of Fig. 4c), a magnetic field antiparallel to Mc will lead to the domain switching into the (CB(−Mc), QB(−Pc)) domains with negative Mc and Pc (Top right panel of Fig. 4c). As displayed in Fig. 4c, each of the eight possible domains can be transformed into only one of the other domains by applying Bc. Such a B-induced domain switching can be viewed as a flop of the cone axis. Note that the cone axis flops across not only the ab plane but also the bc plane during the switching. The cone-axis flop across the ab plane leads to the reversal of M along the c axis while the cone-axis flop across the bc plane gives rise to the reversal of P along the c axis. This is because the effective spiral handedness of the cycloidal component in the cone projected onto the bc plane reverses after the flop. The reversal of the handedness of the spin cycloid component with propagation vector along the b axis and the rotation axis along the a axis causes the reversal of magnetically-induced P along the c axis in the framework of the inverse DM mechanism8. This scheme is also consistent with no sign change in the spin-helicity h after the reversal of M and P, which was revealed by our unpolarized and polarized neutron scattering measurements. Thus, the simultaneous reversal of M and P observed in Mn2GeO4 is well explained in the light of a flop of the cone axis in the conical spin chains.

Phenomenologically, the M-P coupling can be described by the coupling term W (equation (3)), as we will show now: from the coupling term V (equation (2)) we know that a reversal of X3 (or the magnetization) leads to switching of the Q domains (from QA to QB or vice versa). The coupling term W dictates that the two different Q domains couple with the same helicity to both magnetization and ferroelectricity. Experimentally, we established that a reversal of the magnetization leads to a conservation of the spin-helicity and to a switch of the Q domains, which leaves the term in W describing the magnetic structure invariant under a reversal of the magnetization. The term W describes thus a direct coupling between the ferroelectric polarization and the magnetization—consistent with the microscopic scenario explained above.

In summary, unpolarized and polarized neutron scattering experiments have been carried out on single crystals of the olivine-type Mn2GeO4 to elucidate a unique coupling mechanism between ferromagnetism and ferroelectricity observed in this multiferroic compound. We investigated the double-Q magnetic structure of the multiferroic state by selectively preparing and controlling the populations of various types of magnetic domains. We have shown that the combination of canted commensurate and spin spiral incommensurate magnetic components offer unconventional magnetoelectric couplings such as the magnetic-field control of Q domain switching and electric polarization reversal without a change of spin-helicity. The double-Q magnetic structure of multiferroic Mn2GeO4 can be regarded as canted conical spin spirals, which well explains the parallel configuration of spontaneous magnetization and electric polarization. Furthermore, we revealed that the simultaneous reversal of magnetization and electric polarization observed in this multiferroic can be understood in terms of a flop of the cone axis in the conical spin chains. The present study describes how magnetization and ferroelectric polarization in spin-driven ferroelectrics with conical magnetic order can be coupled on a phenomenological level in the case where they are parallel to each other. Furthermore, it stands out as a text-book case of how complex and seemingly unexpected coupling terms can be engineered in such spin-driven ferroelectrics. The essence of the present phenomenological discussion can be also applied to other conical-spin-driven ferroelectrics.


Sample preparation and measurement of electric polarization

Single crystals of Mn2GeO4 were grown by the floating zone technique, as reported previously14. For measurements of neutron diffraction and electric polarization P, the crystals were cut into thin plate-shaped specimens. The widest faces of these specimens were perpendicular to the c axis in order to apply an electric field along the ferroelectric c axis. For the measurements of P, a plate-shaped specimen with the dimension approximately 1 mm2 × 45 μm was used, and silver electrodes were vacuum-deposited on the surfaces of the specimen. To obtain P as a function of cooling electric field, pyroelectric current was measured with an electrometer after cooling the specimen from high temperature into the multiferroic phase in various cooling electric fields applied along the c axis.

Phenomenological coupling theory

To develop the phenomenological coupling theory, we first determined the symmetry properties of the magnetic and ferroelectric order parameters found experimentally. The symmetry properties of the magnetic order parameters are determined by their irreducible representation, and lead directly to the transformation properties of the order parameters given in Supplementary Eqs 2−7 of Supplementary Note 1. The transformation property of the ferroelectric polarization is given in Supplementary Eq. 1 of Supplementary Note 1, similar to the procedure used in ref. 29. Using these transformation properties, we construct coupling terms that are invariant under the space group symmetry elements, and those relevant to Mn2GeO4 are listed in equations (1)–(3), . A full account of the phenomenological coupling theory is described in ref. 30.

Polarized neutron diffraction

Polarized neutron diffraction (PND) measurements were carried out using both the cold neutron triple-axis spectrometer TASP (λ=3.189 Å) equipped with the MuPAD device31 at the PSI, Switzerland, and the hot diffractometer D3 (λ=0.825 Å) equipped with the CryoPAD device32 at the Institut Laue-Langevin, France. All experiments were carried out on single crystal samples of approximate masses 50–100 mg, and cut into thin plates of approximate cross-section 10 × 20 × 1 mm3, with thin dimension parallel to the ferroelectric c axis. The samples were always mounted with a [100]−[010] horizontal scattering plane, which allowed access for SNP measurements over a range of commensurate (C) and incommensurate (IC) magnetic peak positions.

PND measurements at TASP

For the TASP experiment, a 10 nm layer of Cr and 50 nm layer of Au were sequentially evaporated onto the surfaces of the plate-like sample for making electrical connections. The sample was then oriented and mounted on an aluminium spacer positioned at the end of a bespoke sample stick designed for the application of high voltages (up to 5 kV) at cryogenic temperatures33. The high-voltage lines were connected directly to the Cr–Au sample electrodes using silver paint, so that electric fields could be applied along the ferroelectric c axis. The sample space at the end of the stick was indium-sealed and covered by an Al vacuum can. The sample space was evacuated in order to avoid electric-field breakdown across the sample during the measurements. The high voltage stick with pumped sample space was then installed into a standard Orange cryostat (base temperature of 2 K), which itself was installed into the MuPAD device at the TASP beamline. Polarization matrix measurements were carried out at 2 K, after either zero-field cooling or electric-field cooling through the multiferroic transition at 5.5 K. When at the base temperature, the electric field could be removed for the SNP measurements. We observed no effect on the resulting data due to the electric field removal in the multiferroic phase.

PND measurements at D3

For the D3 experiments, a plate-like sample (without pre-deposited electrodes) was installed onto a different bespoke 5 kV high voltage sample stick. On this stick the application of electric fields along the c axis is achieved by a potential difference applied across two parallel Al plates. The sample was fixed to one plate by a silver epoxy, and the other plate positioned close to, but not touching the other sample surface. Thus the actual electric field across the sample was not exactly the same as the applied voltage. By comparing between similar electric-field cooling measurements as done at TASP we could estimate the absolute electric field scale in the D3 experiments. Similarly as for the TASP experiments, the sample space of the sample stick used at D3 was also indium-sealed by an Al can and the sample space evacuated. The pumped sample stick was then installed into a ‘thin tail’ Orange cryostat (base temperature of 3.5 K), which could then be installed into the CryoPAD device at the D3 beamline. SNP measurements were done after either zero-field cooling or electric-field cooling through the multiferroic transition, similarly as at TASP.

In addition at D3, an electromagnet (maximum applied field ±1.2 T) was available. By installing the thin-tail cryostat into the electromagnet, vertical magnetic fields could be applied along the c axis, in addition to electric fields. Thus at D3 we could investigate the effects of magnetoelectric cooling (simultaneous magnetic field- and electric field-cooling) into the multiferroic phase, and also magnetic field sweeping from positive to negative magnetic fields within the multiferroic phase. Since the electromagnet cannot be integrated with the CryoPAD device, each sample state preparation involving the magnetic field was done ‘offline;’ by using the beamline crane we could seamlessly interchange the high voltage stick and cryostat ensemble between the CryoPAD device and the electromagnet stationed nearby. Thus, once the sample had been either poled to 3.5 K through the multiferroic transition under simultaneously applied electric- and magnetic-fields, or the magnetic field was swept between ±1.2 T at the slightly elevated temperature of 4.5 K, all fields were then removed before the cryostat and sample stick were installed back into the CryoPAD device for the SNP measurements of the newly prepared state.

Spherical neutron polarimetry technique

Both of the MuPAD and CryoPAD devices allowed for SNP measurements of magnetic Bragg scattering at TASP and D3, respectively. SNP is a technique that, given an incident neutron beam polarized along an arbitrary direction, enables the full measurement of the direction of neutron spin polarization after the scattering process. The results are expressed as a polarization matrix

where the ket describes the initial neutron spin state, the bra describes the final neutron spin state (or the final spin-flip state), σ is the Pauli operator for the neutron spin, and is the component of that is perpendicular to the neutron scattering vector q. Here M(q) is the magnetic structure factor. Full details of the calculation of M(q) for the different magnetic structures in Mn2GeO4, are given in the Supplement of ref. 18. The quantity is the intensity of the magnetic Bragg peak observed for the incoming i and outgoing j spin polarizations.

The SNP technique is a particularly powerful probe of complex magnetic structures and magnetic domain distributions. For the IC spiral structure in the multiferroic phase of Mn2GeO4, and for a perfectly efficient polarized neutron scattering setup, a general polarization matrix can be written for a magnetic Bragg peak probed at q:

Here , and . In this work we use the standard coordinate system where x is defined as always parallel to q, z perpendicular to the scattering plane, and y orthogonal to both x and z. Consequently at each q, .

The F and G parameters of are measured experimentally and compared with the values expected according to a model for magnetic structure and domain populations. The terms G are the so-called ‘chiral’ scattering elements of , and by definition can only be finite when the magnetic structure has multiple modes that are out-of-phase with one another, such as is the case for non-collinear structures like cycloids, helices, and the IC spiral order in Mn2GeO4. The measured value of G not only depends on the magnetic structure in the sample, but it is also sensitive to the populations of the possible domains of the magnetic structure. In the multiferroic phase of Mn2GeO4, the spin spiral magnetic structure of each Q domain has a helicity degree-of-freedom (±h) the sign of which is intimately related to the direction of ferroelectric polarization along either +c or −c. After zero-field cooling, equal populations of opposite helicity domains are realized, which will give either G<0 or G>0. Thus for equal helicity domain populations the so-called ‘chiral’ scattering averages out and the measured value of G=0, as would be observed for a collinear structure. On the other hand, as we demonstrate in our experiments at TASP, by applying an electric field along the ferroelectric c axis while cooling, the helicity domain population within each Q domain can be controlled, and finite values of G are observed. Thus, not only does measuring a finite value of G allow the determination of the relative fraction of spiral domains of opposite handedness (which generate ferroelectricity along either +c or −c), but it further confirms the IC phase of Mn2GeO4 to be symmetry-breaking complex magnetic order with out-of-phase modes.

The full calculation of the expected F and G parameters further depends on the exact orientation of the magnetic scattering vector q with respect to the real-space spin distribution. If the measured q is exactly perpendicular to the spin rotation plane of the non-collinear spiral structure, then one obtains G=±1 for a mono-handedness spiral state and F=0. Typically however, most of our polarization matrix measurements were done at IC q vectors which lie at angles away from perpendicular to the spin spiral rotation plane. Consequently, even for a Q domain containing mono-handed spiral order, the magnitude of G becomes <1, and the magnitude of F larger than 0. Nevertheless, when armed with a full model for the magnetic structure, the measured values for F and G at any q allow for a full determination of the spiral-handedness domain populations. We used the MuFIT program25 for both analysing and fitting the SNP data to determine the magnetic domain populations.

We also briefly mention that in our SNP experiments we measured some polarization matrices of Bragg peaks due to the C magnetic orders in the various phases of Mn2GeO4. As expected for these simple q=0 antiferromagnetically modulated structures, the measured matrices only had finite diagonal elements, and the G parameters were always measured to be 0 within uncertainty.

Unpolarized neutron diffraction

Unpolarized neutron diffraction measurements were carried out using the TriCS diffractometer at PSI (λ =1.178 Å). Similarly as for the SNP experiments described above at TASP, a plate-like Mn2GeO4 sample was mounted on the same 5 kV high voltage stick33 so that electric fields could be applied parallel to the crystal c axis. The horizontal scattering plane at TriCS contained the [100]−[010] directions. The high voltage stick was installed into the variable temperature insert (VTI) of a 6 T vertical field cryomagnet (base temperature 2 K), so that both electric and magnetic fields could be applied simultaneously along the crystal c axis. Unlike at D3, the cryomagnet apparatus could be installed on the beamline, and the electric- and/or magnetic-field cooling from high temperature into the multiferroic phase done ‘online’. After field-cooling the sample through the multiferroic transition, all fields were then removed before data collection at 2 K. In the case of magnetic-field sweeping an already poled sample, the magnetic field sweeps were done after carefully elevating the temperature to 4.5 K. We found that at this slightly higher temperature the effect of the magnetic field sweeping on the magnetic domain populations was more pronounced than when sweeping was done at 2 K. After the sweeps the field was removed and the temperature lowered back to 2 K for the data collection.

After each multiferroic state preparation, either by electric- and/or magnetic-field cooling, or by magnetic field sweeping, we studied both the C and IC magnetic structure components that exist in this state. Typical data sets constituted integrated intensity measurements for 50 C magnetic peaks and 70 IC magnetic peaks. Refinements of the integrated intensity data and magnetic domain populations were done using the FullProf program28 and the models proposed in ref. 18. From these refinements we determined the relative populations of the CA and CB C domain types, and the QA and QB IC domain types for each prepared state (with these domain types introduced in the main text), and consequently the relationships between them based on the response of their relative populations to the applied electric and magnetic fields.

Data availability

The data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors on request.

Additional information

How to cite this article: Honda, T. et al. Coupled multiferroic domain switching in the canted conical spin spiral system Mn2GeO4. Nat. Commun. 8, 15457 doi: 10.1038/ncomms15457 (2017).

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.


  1. 1

    Schmid, H. Multi-ferroic magnetoelectrics. Ferroelectrics 162, 317–338 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Schmid, H. Some symmetry aspects of ferroics and single phase multiferroics. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 20, 434201 (2008).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Tokura, Y., Seki, S. & Nagaosa, N. Multiferroics of spin origin. Rep. Prog. Phys 77, 076501 (2014).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Jia, C., Onoda, S., Nagaosa, N. & Han, J. H. Microscopic theory of spin-polarization coupling in multiferroic transition metal oxides. Phys. Rev. B 76, 144424 (2007).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Cheong, S.-W. & Mostovoy, M. Multiferroics: a magnetic twist for ferroelectricity. Nat. Mater. 6, 13–20 (2007).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Kimura, T. Spiral magnets as magnetoelectrics. Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 37, 387–413 (2007).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Johnson, R. D. & Radaelli, P. G. Diffraction studies of multiferroics. Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 44, 269–298 (2014).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Katsura, H., Nagaosa, N. & Balatsky, A. V. Spin current and magnetoelectric effect in noncollinear magnets. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 057205 (2005).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Yamasaki, Y. et al. Magnetic reversal of the ferroelectric polarization in a multiferroic spinel oxide. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 207204 (2006).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Choi, Y. J. et al. Thermally or magnetically induced polarization reversal in the multiferroic CoCr2O4 . Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 067601 (2009).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Ishiwata, S., Taguchi, Y., Murakawa, H., Onose, Y. & Tokura, Y. Low-magnetic-field control of electric polarization vector in a helimagnet. Science 319, 1643–1646 (2008).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Taniguchi, K., Abe, N., Ohtani, S., Umetsu, H. & Arima, T. Ferroelectric polarization reversal by a magnetic field in multiferroic Y-type hexaferrite Ba2Mg2Fe12O22 . Appl. Phys. Express 1, 031301 (2008).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Chun, S. H. et al. Realization of giant magnetoelectricity in helimagnets. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 037204 (2010).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Tokunaga, Y. et al. Multiferroic M-type hexaferrite with a room-temperature conical state and magnetically controllable spin helicity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 257201 (2010).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Soda, M., Ishikura, T., Nakamura, H., Wakabayashi, Y. & Kimura, T. Magnetic ordering in relation to the room-temperature magnetoelectric effect of Sr3Co2Fe24O41 . Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 257201 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Wang, F., Zou, T., Yan, L.-Q., Liu, Y. & Sun, Y. Low magnetic field reversal of electric polarization in a Y-type hexaferrite. Appl. Phys. Lett. 100, 122901 (2012).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Kimura, T. Magnetoelectric hexaferrites. Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 3, 93–110 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    White, J. S. et al. Coupling of magnetic and ferroelectric hysteresis by a multi-component magnetic structure in Mn2GeO4 . Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 077204 (2012).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Honda, T., Ishiguro, Y., Nakamura, H., Wakabayashi, Y. & Kimura, T. Structure and magnetic phase diagrams of multiferroic Mn2GeO4 . J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 81, 103703 (2012).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Creer, J. G. & Troup, G. J. The crystal and magnetic structures of Mn2GeO4 . Solid State Commun. 8, 1183–1188 (1970).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Volkov, N. V. et al. Magnetic phase diagram of the olivine-type Mn2GeO4 single crystal estimated from magnetic, resonance and thermodynamic properties. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 25, 136003 (2013).

    CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Brown, P. J. Magnetic structure studied with zero-field polarimetry. Physica B 192, 14–24 (1993).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Lawes, G. et al. Magnetically driven ferroelectric order in Ni3V2O8 . Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 087205 (2005).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Kenzelmann, M. et al. Magnetic inversion symmetry breaking and ferroelectricity in TbMnO3 . Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 087206 (2005).

    CAS  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Poole, A. & Roessli, B. Analysis of neutron polarimetry data using MuFit. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 340, 012017 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Cabrera, I. et al. Coupled magnetic and ferroelectric domains in multiferroic Ni3V2O8 . Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 087201 (2009).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    White, J. S. et al. Stress-induced magnetic domain selection reveals a conical ground state for the multiferroic phase of Mn2GeO4 . Phys. Rev. B 94, 024439 (2016).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Rodríguez-Carvajal, J. Recent advances in magnetic structure determination by neutron powder diffraction. Physica B 192, 55–69 (1993).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Harris, A. B., Kenzelmann, M., Aharony, A. & Entin-Wohlman, O. Effect of inversion symmetry on the incommensurate order in multiferroic RMn2O5 (R=rare earth). Phys. Rev. B 78, 014407 (2008).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30

    Harris, A. B. Landau Potential for Multiferroic Mn2GeO4. Preprint at (2017).

  31. 31

    Janoschek, M., Klimko, S., Gähler, R., Roessli, B. & Böni, P. Spherical neutron polarimetry with MuPAD. Physica B 397, 125–130 (2007).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32

    Tasset, F., Brown, P. J. & Forsyth, J. B. Determination of the absolute magnetic moment direction in Cr2O3 using generalized polarization analysis. J. Appl. Phys. 63, 3606–3608 (1988).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33

    Bartkowiak, M., White, J. S., Rønnow, H. M. & Prša, K. Note: Versatile sample stick for neutron scattering experiments in high electric fields. Rev. Sci. Inst. 85, 026112 (2014).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank M. Fiebig for valuable discussions. We acknowledge financial support from Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (No. 24244058), Grant-in-Aid for the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science Fellows (No. 24·1989), the Swiss National Centre of Competence in Research program MaNEP and the SNF under Grant Nos. 200021_126687, 200021_138018, and 20021_153451, Switzerland. This work is based on experiments performed at SINQ, PSI, Villigen, Switzerland and ILL, Grenoble, France. The work was also supported by Condensed Matter Research Center (CMRC) in KEK, Japan.

Author information




T.H., J.S.W., M.K. and T.K. designed this work. T.H. and T.K. prepared single crystals of Mn2GeO4. T.H., J.S.W. and M.K. carried out the neutron scattering experiments with L.C.C. (D3, ILL), A.F. and B.R. (MuPAD+TASP, PSI) and O.Z. (TriCS, PSI). A.B.H. developed the phenomenological coupling theory. T.H., J.S.W., M.K. and T.K. co-wrote the paper. All authors reviewed the manuscript and agree with the results and conclusions.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to M. Kenzelmann or T. Kimura.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figure, Supplementary Tables, Supplementary Note and Supplementary References (PDF 464 kb)

Peer Review File (PDF 463 kb)

Rights and permissions

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Honda, T., White, J., Harris, A. et al. Coupled multiferroic domain switching in the canted conical spin spiral system Mn2GeO4. Nat Commun 8, 15457 (2017).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing