Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Control of type III protein secretion using a minimal genetic system


Gram-negative bacteria secrete proteins using a type III secretion system (T3SS), which functions as a needle-like molecular machine. The many proteins involved in T3SS construction are tightly regulated due to its role in pathogenesis and motility. Here, starting with the 35 kb Salmonella pathogenicity island 1 (SPI-1), we eliminated internal regulation and simplified the genetics by removing or recoding genes, scrambling gene order and replacing all non-coding DNA with synthetic genetic parts. This process results in a 16 kb cluster that shares no sequence identity, regulation or organizational principles with SPI-1. Building this simplified system led to the discovery of essential roles for an internal start site (SpaO) and small RNA (InvR). Further, it can be controlled using synthetic regulatory circuits, including under SPI-1 repressing conditions. This work reveals an incredible post-transcriptional robustness in T3SS assembly and aids its control as a tool in biotechnology.


Bacteria use T3SSs to export proteins through both the inner and outer membranes. They have a central role in virulence for many human pathogens (e.g., Salmonella, Yersinia, Shigella, Escherichia coli) and in building the flagellum for motility1,2,3. It has also been harnessed in biotechnology for the production of materials and biologics, agricultural biocontrol agents, cancer therapies and vaccine delivery4,5,6,7,8,9. The T3SS forms a large needle (3.5 MDa) with rings in the inner and outer membranes and a secretion tunnel that extends 50 nm from the cell surface10,11. The assembly of the structure is hierarchical, where substructures nucleate first and then are built upon to form the needle complex12,13,14. T3SS genes are under strict regulatory control because the needle is metabolically expensive, they are transiently required during pathogenesis and they are coordinated with other membrane-associated structures15,16,17.

One of the most well-studied T3SSs is encoded in Salmonella pathogenicity island 1 (SPI-1) and is involved in the invasion of epithelial cells during an early stage of infection18,19. In addition to the T3SS genes, SPI-1 also encodes effectors and chaperones20,21. It also contains an internal regulatory network that is embedded in global regulation22. This network integrates many signals and consists of coupled feedforward and feedback loops23,24. Many regulatory motifs are also encoded in the genetics of SPI-1, including regulatory 5′- and 3′-UTRs, long promoters with many operators and start sites, transcriptional interference, transcriptional and translational control internal to genes, translational coupling, and sensitivity to DNA supercoiling25,26,27,28,29.

Collectively, the overlapping, redundant and non-modular organization of natural genetics complicates the interpretation of top-down genetic changes because a single change can lead to a web of effects. Even when regulation appears to be related to a functional need, proving the linkage is difficult. For example, in distinguishing whether gene order and operons are required for efficient T3SS assembly30,31 or are a superfluous remnant of evolution32,33. Here, we have taken the bottom-up approach of rebuilding SPI-1 from scratch, only retaining those genes and organizational principles required for T3SS assembly and function.

The goal is to create an alternative ‘refactored’ genetic encoding34 where the genetics are modular, each part is fully characterized, and whose induction can be controlled with a synthetic circuit (Fig. 1b)35. Refactoring involves the elimination of non-coding DNA, internal transcription factors and non-essential genes. Regulation is eliminated from open reading frames by selecting new codons to diversify the underlying DNA sequence. Genes are organized into artificial operons and expression is controlled with synthetic promoters, 5′-UTRs, ribosome-binding sites (RBSs) and terminators. A separate ‘controller’ is built that contains genetic sensors and circuits, the output of which expresses the phage polymerase to induce expression of T3SS genes. Many intermediate designs failed and the debugging process revealed which features are disposable, as well as identified new essential regulation. During this process, electron microscopy (EM) is used to visualize the structure of needle complexes and this proves critical in determining how part choices impact that the final assembled structures.

Figure 1: The native and refactored versions of SPI-1 are compared.

(a) SPI-1 is shown with the known internal and global regulatory network24,58,67. Transcription factors are shown in red/orange, effectors/chaperones are shown in grey, genes outside SPI-1 are white, and structural genes are coloured by operon occupancy. Transcriptional start sites for forward/reverse promoters are indicated by arrows above/below the DNA line22,25,58,68. Regions of translational coupling are marked with triangles and the number is the length of overlapping DNA. Predicted H-NS and Fur operator sites are shown68. Small RNAs are shown as empty triangles25. Knockouts described in this manuscript are shown along with the beginning and end nucleotide sequence, numbered to correspond to the LT2 genome sequence (NC_003197.1). (b) The complete refactored SPI-1 is shown, including the controller (prg-orgR5inv-spaR4 and pMR_controller3). Each genetic part is surrounded by a grey box with the SBOLv ( symbol and SynBERC Registry ( part number at the bottom (each number is preceded by a SBa_). The number under the symbols shows the relative strengths of promoters and RBSs (Methods). The sequences of all genetic parts, including codon optimized genes, are provided in Supplementary Table 6. The plasmids containing the controller and two refactored operons are shown, with the full maps described in Supplementary Figs 17 and 18. The complete refactored system is shown, with intermediate constructs and strains described in Supplementary Table 2.

The end result of this work is an ultrasimplified 16 kb gene cluster that contains the minimal genetics required for assembly and function. This sharpens our understanding of which conserved regulatory mechanisms are required to build this sophisticated molecular machine. Further, it simplifies its use in biotechnology by decoupling the system from the greater regulatory network such that it can be controlled using synthetic regulatory circuits38.


Overview of refactoring process

The complete refactored SPI-1 is shown in Figure 1b and the sequence of each component part is shown in Supplementary Table 6. Four intermediate steps were taken to get to this final cluster. First, the prgHJIKorgABC genes were refactored together and tested for complementation in a Salmonella typimurium ?prgH-orgC strain (Supplementary Note 2.B). These genes make up the inner membrane ring, needle filament, and portions of the sorting platform that loads proteins from the cytoplasm to the needle3,21. Second, the invHFGEACIJspaOPQRS genes were refactored and tested in a ΔinvH-spaS strain. These genes include those that comprise outer membrane ring and sorting platform3,21,37. Then, the two refactored operons were tested together in the double knockout ΔprgH-orgC?invH-spaS, which retains all of the intervening SPI-1 genes, including effectors, chaperones, peptidoglycan/LPS modifying enzymes, and regulatory proteins (Figure 1a). To differentially control the two refactored operons, we chose to use two phage RNAPs that do not cross-react with each other s promoters38. Finally, the complete refactored system, including controller, was tested in a ΔSPI-1 strain where the entire cluster is knocked out. At each step, the initial designs were suboptimal or non-functional and had to be fixed through rounds of debugging, described below.

Refactoring the prg-org operon

The prgH-orgC genes were refactored and synthesized as a complete operon, and tested in a ΔprgH-orgC knockout. The prgHIJK and orgAB genes were recoded and only share 38% codon identity to the wild-type sequences. OrgC had been shown to be non-essential and was not included39. A library of synthetic RBSs was quantified in Salmonella and these were used to control the expression of each gene, the desired levels of which were estimated from the ratios observed in a supramolecular assembly10 and the experimental characterization of the native RBS strengths (Supplementary Note 1A and Supplementary Fig. 2). Those genes requiring the highest expression were placed at the 5′-end of the operon; this leads to a permuted order of prgIJHKorgAB (Supplementary Note 1A). This and the modular design disrupt four regions of translational coupling (Fig. 1a). The resulting 3.9 kb operon was placed under IPTG-inducible Ptac control on a pSC101 plasmid backbone. A secretion assay was used to detect FLAG-tagged SptP effector in the supernatant as well as the presence of GroEL as a control for non-specific leakage (see Methods). The ΔprgH-orgC knockout can be complemented by a plasmid containing the native operon (including the prgH promoter) or the refactored version (0.1 mM IPTG) (Fig. 2a).

Figure 2: Intermediate steps in building and debugging the refactored SPI-1.

See Supplementary Table 2 and Supplementary Fig. 1 for the strain and variants of the refactored operons. See Methods for the description of the growth conditions and secretion assays. WT refers to Salmonella typhimurium DW01 and – is the knockout strain containing the reporter plasmid (Supplementary Fig. 16). The +native label refers to the knockout strain with the native operon under the control of the native promoter (prg-org) or PBAD (inv-spa, +0.1 mM arabinose) on a plasmid (Supplementary Fig. 21). (a) Secretion assays are shown for the ΔprgH-orgC strain complemented with prg-orgR1 (+refac., +0.1 mM IPTG) on a plasmid. (b) Representative EM images are shown for negative stained needle complex isolated from a ΔflhDC strain containing intact SPI-1 versus the complementation of a double knockout with the refactored operons (prg-orgR3 and inv-spaR3). The scale bar indicates 50 nm. (c) Needle complex components are visualized by western blot analysis, comparing the refactored operon lacking RiboJ (−, prg-orgR3) or containing RiboJ (+, prg-orgR4). (d) A secretion assay is shown for the first refactored inv-spaR1 operon. (e) A secretion assay is shown for chimeras made based on the first refactored operon where the native RBS and gene is swapped into each position (Supplementary Note 1C). (f) A set of spaO chimeras was made between the native sequence (white) and the codon optimized sequence (grey) within the refactored inv-spaR1 operon. The result of a secretion assay is shown. (g) The sequence of the native spaO gene is shown with the putative internal RBS underlined and start codon (GTG) in bold. (h) The internal start codon was mutated to GTT on the plasmid with native inv-spa operon. A secretion assay is shown for the complemented inv-spa (+native) compared to the single mutation (+gtt spaO). (i) Translated peptides from wild type or synthetic sequence of spaO was confirmed by western blot analysis. (j) Secretion assays are shown for variations of the refactored inv-spa operon that contains only full-length spaO, both spaO and the short spaOs (inv-spaR2), and only spaOs.

Because the refactored prgH-orgC operon was able to complement secretion, we progressed to the second SPI-1 operon (below). However, when we later imaged the needles using EM after the invH-SpaS operon was refactored (Fig. 1b), we found that they lacked extracellular needle protrusions (Fig. 2b). Because PrgI forms the needle filament and PrgJ has been implicated in needle length10,40, we decided to increase their expression. Since we already used a strong RBS for prgI, we added a synthetic 5′-UTR that contains a hairpin and ribozyme (RiboJ) that we have observed increases expression41. Indeed, this increases the expression of PrgI and PrgJ, leading to structures with the correct needle length (Fig. 2c and Supplementary Fig. 9).

Refactoring the inv-spa operon

A similar approach was taken to design the refactored invH-spaS operon. Less information about protein ratios could be gleaned from supramolecular assembly, so there was more reliance on the native RBS strengths, with the default of keeping the levels approximately equal (Supplementary Note 1A and Supplementary Fig. 2). An initial construct was designed that radically changed the order of the genes (5′ to 3′): invJ, spaQ, invA, invF, invC, spaP, invG, spaS, invE, spaO, invI, spaR. The InvB chaperone was not included because it previously had been shown to be non-essential42. This reorganization and RBS selection disrupts 8 regions of translational coupling (Fig. 1a). The refactored inv-spa operon was synthesized as a single construct and placed under arabinose-inducible PBAD control on a pSC101 plasmid. This was unable to complement secretion in a ΔinvF-spaS knockout, even though secretion could be recovered when the native invF-spaS operon is expressed using the same inducible system and plasmid backbone (Fig. 2d).

To determine which gene(s) were causing the loss of function, a series of chimeric operons were tested that substituted each codon-optimized gene and RBS into the wild-type operon carried on the plasmid backbone (Fig. 2e and Supplementary Fig. 4). This narrowed the candidate to the recoded spaO gene, whose product oligomerizes to form the cytoplasmic C-ring37. Believing this to be due to the codon selection disrupting expression, we redesigned the codon usage and synthesized a second gene, which also proved to be non-functional. From this, we hypothesized that the mutations could be disrupting an internal regulatory sequence. A series of chimeras were built that cross the synthetic and native sequences and a region in the centre of spaO (nucleotides 456–610) was found to be essential for function (Fig. 2f, Supplementary Note 1D). This region contains an alternative RBS and start codon (Fig. 2g) and when the start codon is mutated from gtg to gtt, this eliminates secretion (Fig. 2h, Supplementary Note 1D, Supplementary Table 4 and Supplementary Fig. 5). Using a western blot analysis confirmed by liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC-MS) (see Methods, Supplementary Data 1), we discovered that there is a long (33 kDa) and short (11 kDa) protein that is tandem translated from spaO mRNA (Fig. 2i). After we discovered this, similar control was reported for SpaO homologues in the Salmonella SPI-2, Shigella and Yersinia T3SSs43,44,45. Our solution was to unpack the genetics34 into independent long (spaO) and short (spaOs) genes that are physically separated in the refactored inv-spa operon (Fig. 1b, Supplementary Table 5, Supplementary Fig. 6). It is noteworthy that this also occurs in natural systems, where homologues to the long and short form appear as separate genes in the clusters encoding the Salmonella flagellum (fliMN) and the Pseudomonas T3SS44,46.

A version of the refactored inv-spa operon containing the spaO, spaOs and invH genes was tested in the context of a ΔinvH-spaS knockout. The separate encoding of the spaO genes is able to recover secretion and the lack of either gene causes an appreciable reduction in titre (Fig. 2j). At this point, the invH gene was also codon optimized and included in the refactored inv-spa construct (Supplementary Note 1E and Supplementary Fig. 7). In SPI-1, invH is transcribed in the opposite orientation as invF-spaS. While not essential for secretion, it has been shown to improve titre13. Incorporating it into the refactored inv-spa demonstrates that the separate transcription units can be encoded as a single operon.

Design and construction of the complete refactored SPI-1

A controller was then built to unify the regulation of the two refactored operons. A two-input two-output controller was constructed for Salmonella (Fig. 3a)38. The two outputs are engineered RNAPs that bind to different promoter sequences and do not cross-react38. They are based on the T7 RNAP scaffold modified to be less toxic (T7*) and contain the DNA-binding loop from either T3 RNAP or K1F RNAP. The inputs to the controller are a tight IPTG-inducible system (Ptac-O2) and AHL-inducible system, which independently control T7*(T3) and T7*(K1F), respectively. Leaky expression was reduced by using weak RBSs to control the RNAPs, placing transcription units in opposite orientations, and using a low copy (IncW) plasmid (Supplementary Fig. 17). Each operon was then placed under the control of T7*(T3)- and T7*(K1F)-dependent promoters chosen to generate expression levels equivalent to the strength of the inducible systems used to test them individually (Supplementary Figs 3 and 8, Supplementary Notes 1B and 1F). The controller and refactored prg-org and inv-spa operons were first tested in a double knockout strain (ΔprgH-orgCΔinvH-spaS). This strain retains the remainder of SPI-1, including the region between prgH and spaS (containing the hilD and hilA regulators, 7 sic-sip-spt effectors and chaperones, iagB, and iacP) as well as a region upstream of hilC containing sprB and avrA (Fig. 1a). Upon the addition of both 10 μM IPTG and 10 μM AHL, the dual operon system recovers full secretion in the double knockout (Fig. 3b, Supplementary Note 1G).

Figure 3: Completion of the refactored SPI-1.

(a) The dual controller is shown where T7*(T3) and T7*(K1F) are under IPTG- and AHL-inducible control, respectively (Supplementary Fig. 17). (b) A secretion assay is shown for a double knockout strain containing the two refactored operons (prg-orgR4 and inv-spaR3) with a controller (+10 μM IPTG/+10 μM AHL). The – lane is the absence of any complementation plasmid but with the inclusion of the reporter. (c) The secretion assay is shown for the duel (prg-orgR4 and inv-spaR3) and controller (+10 μM IPTG/+10 μM AHL) in ΔSPI-1 strain. (d) An illustration of the repression of major Salmonella porin protein OmpD by small regulatory RNA, InvR upon activation by HilD encoded in SPI-1 (refs 1, 2, 3). (e) The secretion assay in a ΔSPI-1 background complemented with the refactored operons (prg-orgR4 and inv-spaR3; lane 3) and controller (+10 μM IPTG/+10 μM AHL). The +invR lane corresponds to the presence of the small RNA (prg-orgR5 and inv-spaR4, MR27). The ΔompD strain contains the additional porin knockout (prg-orgR4 and inv-spaR4, MR29).

Next, we tested the refactored operons (prg-org and inv-spa) and controller in a complete ΔSPI-1 knockout. This knockout removes an additional 17.1 kb of DNA and the sicA, sipBCDA, iacP, sicP, sptP, iagB, hilA, hilD, hilC, sprB and avrA genes as compared to the ΔprgH-orgCΔinvH-spaS strain. In building the final operons, two additional genes hypothesized to be non-essential were removed and the preservation of secretion was confirmed (Supplementary Note 1I and Supplementary Fig. 11). The invF gene encodes a regulator that links the upregulation of effectors to the formation of functional needles23. The invE gene acts as a controller for translocation of SipBCD3,47, which are no longer present in ΔSPI-1.

Surprisingly, no secretion was detected in the ΔSPI-1 strain (Fig. 3c). Further, there was an increase in GroEL, indicating a disruption in the integrity of the cell membrane. To determine the necessary missing component, a second knockout was constructed that reduces the amount of DNA deleted (ΔprgH-orgCΔinvH-iacP), limiting the possible issue to the hilA, hilD and iagB genes and intergenic DNA. The iagB gene was previously identified as non-essential13 and its inclusion in the refactored cluster did not help (Supplementary Note 1H, Supplementary Fig. 10). This shifted the focus to the HilD and HilA regulators, which are known to regulate genes both within and outside of SPI-1 (refs 16, 48, 49). Notably, the invR gene is regulated by HilD and is within SPI-1, but is outside of the region removed to build the ΔSPI-1 knockout (Fig. 1a). This encodes an abundant and stable sRNA regulator that represses the outer membrane protein OmpD (Fig. 3d)50. The invR gene was added to the 3′ end of the refactored prg-org operon (Fig. 1b) and this was found to be sufficient to recover secretion in the ΔSPI-1 strain (Fig. 3e). The background GroEL also returned to wild-type levels. The mechanism was confirmed by making a ΔompD knockout, which had a similar effect as expressing InvR (Fig. 3e). This is consistent with previous work showing that the misexpression of OmpD results in membrane disruption, which can be corrected by invR expression50. The complete functional refactored SPI-1 in the ΔSPI-1 strain does not correspond to an increase in cell leakage or a decline in growth rate (Supplementary Fig. 14). In addition, the refactored SPI-1 was able to restore secretion in other Salmonella strains lacking SPI-1 (Supplementary Methods and Supplementary Fig. 15).

Structure and function of the refactored T3SS

The refactored cluster was then tested in media where native SPI-1 is strongly repressed. The standard means of inducing SPI-1 is in a high-osmolarity complex media (LB broth with 0.3 M NaCl). The refactored SPI-1 is active in this media, albeit at a lower titre (6.7±1.4 mg l−1) than wild-type levels (8.0±0.9 mg l−1) (Fig. 4a). The refactored system and SPI-1 produce similar titres in complex media at lower osmolarity (L-broth): 6.4±1.7 mg l−1 from wild-type and 6.8±0.1 mg l−1 from the the refactored system, respectively. SPI-1 is repressed in minimal media with low concentrations of phosphate or magnesium, which are representative of conditions in the macrophage25,51,52. As such, the native SPI-1 is strongly repressed in N salt minimal media with casamino acids as a carbon source (Fig. 4a). However, the refactored system can be induced with 10 μM IPTG and AHL in this media and, leading to a titre of 3.4±0.5 mg l−1.

Figure 4: Structural and functional analysis of the refactored T3SS.

Data are shown for the complete refactored system (Fig. 1b, prg-orgR5 and inv-spaR4) in the ΔSPI-1 strain background (MR27). (a) Cultures were grown in different media (Methods). The refactored system was induced with 10 μM IPTG and 10 μM AHL. The quantification of secreted proteins is described in Methods. Bacterial growth as OD600 and secreted protein titre are noted at the time of sampling. The growth curves of each culture are shown in Supplementary Fig. 14. (b) Representative images of T3SS needle complexes isolated from Salmonella typhimurium LT2 DW01 (WT) with the flagella knockout are shown (MR05). The image on the right represents a class average from 129 individual particles (see Methods). (c) Same as part b, with the refactored SPI-1 (prg-orgR5 and inv-spaR4) in a ΔflhDCΔSPI-1 background (MR30). The image on the right represents a class average from 158 individual particles. The scale bar indicates 50 nm. The images of individual particles are shown in Supplementary Fig. 24. (d) Relative secretion is calculated at the band intensity of a secretion assay for the refactored SPI-1 divided by the intensity obtained from the wild-type (Methods). A secretion assay was performed 6 h after induction. The following concentrations of inducer were added to the culture: IPTG (0, 0.1, 1, 10, 100 μM) and AHL (0, 0.1, 1, 10, 100 μM). Data represent averages of three replicates performed on different days. (e) The impact of delays between the expression of prg-orgR5 and inv-spaR4 are shown (MR27). For the green and red lines, one inducer is added at t=0 and then the secretion titre is measured at t=6 h. The relative secretion is calculated as described in part d. For the black line, both inducers are added at the indicated time point and the secretion measurement is made at t=6 h. Either inducer is added to a concentration of 10 μM. Data shown are the average of three experiments performed on different days and the error bars represent the s.d.

The structure of the needle complex for the refactored prg-orgR5 and inv-spaR4 operons in ΔSPI-1 was then analysed by EM. Flagella interfere with the images, so an additional flhDC knockout was made to the ΔSPI-1 strain and unmodified control strain. The needles were then purified, negative stained and compared using EM (see Methods). The lengths of the needles and the number of needles per cell are approximately the same for strains containing the native and refactored SPI-1 (Fig. 4b,c). The refactored SPI-1 (prg-orgR5 and inv-spaR4 operons) produces needle complexes that are comparable in topology with the native cluster and are consistent with functional T3SSs observed in previous work11,40,53. RNA-seq of the refactored and WT clusters demonstrated similarity in the ratios of mRNA levels for each gene (Supplementary Methods and Supplementary Fig. 12). In addition, a western blot performed with purified needle complexes showed similar levels of protein expression, with the exception of lower PrgK and higher PrgJ in the refactored system (Supplementary Methods and Supplementary Fig. 13).

The controller enables the independent control of the refactored prg-org and inv-spa operons. We used this as a platform to quantify the sensitivity of secretion to changes in the relative expression levels and timing. These effects can be challenging to quantify using the native system because of the complexity of the regulation, including many redundant interactions and feedback control. The refactored cluster presents a clean system for changing the expression dynamics and measuring the impact on assembly or function. The refactored system was tested to determine if there is background activity due to leakage in either inducible system (Fig. 4d). Secretion could only be detected in the presence of both inducers.

The assembly of the T3SS encoded in SPI-1 occurs in several steps. First, parts of the export apparatus (SpaPQRS) seed the inner membrane, then the inner and outer membrane rings are formed, and finally they are connected and the needle filament extends from the cell surface3,13,14. It has been postulated that the order of T3SS gene expression could reflect the order in which they are needed for assembly. For flagella, it has been observed that the temporal activation of the ‘class 2’ promoters (controlling the homologues to prg or org or inv or spa) reflects the order of assembly54,55. A similar ordering of promoter activities has been observed for T3SSs involved in pathogenesis56. For SPI-1, it has been observed that the needle complex cannot form if the SpaPQRS genes are expressed 5 h after the genes that form the base14. Using the refactored SPI-1, we changed the relative times that the prg-org and inv-spa operons are induced (Fig. 4e). One inducer is always added at t=0 h and the second is added after a delay and secretion is quantified at t=6 h (see Methods). The FLAG tagged SptP secretion reporter is expressed from a constitutive promoter; thus, its total expression over the course of the experiment is constant. For differences in timing less than 3 h, there is no difference in secretion titre: the two operons can be expressed simultaneously or in any order with no effect. After 3 h, there is a significant difference in expressing inv-spa before prg-org, as compared to the opposite order. However, we find that the optimal amount of secretion occurs when both inducers are added simultaneously, indicating that delays on the timescale of transcription and translation do not impact the formation of functional needle complexes.


SPI-1 is regulated by numerous factors and the list has been growing for years22. It has been increasingly difficult to untangle the regulation and determine the importance and role of the individual elements. Here, we have taken a minimalist approach and have re-built SPI-1 from the bottom-up in modular form with completely synthetic parts and regulatory control. This has shown that none of the regulatory motifs or architectural features of the native cluster are required to generate functional needles. Even when essential features were encountered, we were able to recode them in ways that differ from the organization of SPI-1 (e.g., unpacking of spaO, constitutive control of invR, transcript stability for prgI). This demonstrates that there are many equivalent ways to encode this function and, indeed, related T3SS clusters across species shows significant genetic variation57. Thus, the majority of SPI-1 regulation appears to coordinate it with other virulence mechanisms that require precise timing in the host58. Two additional roles for regulation may also provide benefit to the native cluster. First, some regulation, such as the temporal order of gene expression and translational coupling, may not be required for function and rather exists to efficiently utilize cellular resources54,59. Second, non-essential genes and regulation may be important to increase the range of cell states and environmental conditions where the T3SS can function. Indeed, InvR has been speculated to aid the establishment of SPI-1 post-transfer by clearing porins from the new host50. A refactored system offers a platform to test hypotheses regarding the role of regulation or genetic organization. Removing native regulation and modularizing genetics creates a clean background where changes can be made and interpreted in isolation and this enables the comparison of large-scale changes or alternative designs.


Strains and media

The Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium LT2 DW01 strain and isogenic mutant strains used for all experiments are listed in Supplementary Tables 2 and 3. The DW01 lab strain was sequenced and is provided in Supplementary Note 1A and Supplementary Table 1. Each mutant strain was generated by the λ-red-mediated gene replacement system and oligonucleotides used for the generation of mutant strains are listed in Supplementary Table 3 (ref. 60). Genomic mutations were moved into DW01 by P22HT int-mediated transduction, including the double knockout strains and the nonflagellated mutant (ΔflhDC)7. In-frame deletions were generated by recombining the two FRT sites with the Flp recombinases encoded in the pCP20 plasmid. Bacterial cells were grown in L-broth (LB Broth base; Invitrogen #12780-052) or SPI-1-inducing media (IM; LB containing 0.3 M NaCl) (LB Miller Medium, Difco #244620; sodium chloride, amresco #X190) with antibiotics if necessary: chloramphenicol (34 μg ml−1; USB #23600), ampicillin (50 μg ml−1; sodium ampicillin, Gold Biotechnology #A-301-25), kanamycin (50 μg ml−1; kanamycin sulfate, Gold Biotechnology #K-120-10) and spectinomycin (50 μg ml−1; spectinomycin dihydrochloride, Gold Biotechnology #S-140-5). For defined media samples, cells were grown in N salt minimal media (5 mM KCl (Sigma-Aldrich #P5405), 7.5 mM (NH4)SO4 (EMD Millipore #AX1385), 0.5 mM K2SO4 (Fisher Scientific #P304-500), 1 mM KH2PO4 (Sigma-Aldrich #795488), 38 mM glycerol (BDH), 0.1% casamino acids (Difco #223050) supplemented with 100 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.6) with 10 mM or 8 μM MgCl2 (USB #1864). Unless otherwise noted, the refactored clusters were induced by 100 μM L-(+)-arabinose (Sigma #A3256), N-(β-ketocaproyl-L-homoserine lactone (AHL; Cayman Chemical #10011207) and/or 100 μM isopropyl-β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG; Gold Biotechnology #I2481C) supplemented into IM.

Growth Curves

The bacterial growth was measured from the strain expressing wild type or the refactored T3SS in inducing media (IM) or rich media without high osmolarity (L-broth) or defined media (N salt) (Figure 4a). Each bacterial culture was taken every hour after shifting into each media for the measurement of optical density and the refactored system was induced by addition of IPTG and AHL (10 μM, respectively).

ORF design and gene synthesis

The sequence of each gene was initially designed by DNA2.0 (Mountain View, CA, USA) to simultaneously maximize the Hamming distance from the native sequence and optimize the codon usage for Salmonella. All cis-elements including restriction sites, RBS and transcriptional terminators, were eliminated by the DNA2.0 algorithm or via software that we ran (Prokaryotic Promoter Prediction Server for σ70-promoters61, PromScan algorithm for σ54-promoters62 and TransTermHP software for terminators63). DNA was synthesized, typically as complete operons, by DNA2.0.

Synthetic RBS design

The first RBS sequences were obtained from The Registry of Standard Biological Parts ( BBa_B0030, BBa_J61101, BBa_J61130. These RBSs were cloned into XbaI/SacI site between constitutive promoter (BBa_J23100) and red fluorescence protein, mRFP, on a ColE1 plasmid (Supplementary Fig. 20), which was modified from pPROtet.E133 (CmR; Clonetech). Then RBS library was constructed by random mutagenesis using error-prone PCR. Strength of each synthetic RBS from library was measured using mRFP as artificial unit (a.u.) with flow cytometry and screened to adjust the strength to native RBS (Supplementary Note 1A). For design of RBS for spaOs and invH, RBS Calculator online tool version ( was used: the RBS Calculator Design mode version 1.1, with organism option as Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Typhimurium str. LT2 (ACCTCCTTA).

Characterization of genetic parts

To measure RBS strength, bacterial strains were grown in L-broth with antibiotics at 37 °C overnight and then freshly inoculated at 200-fold dilution into fresh L-broth with antibiotics in a 96-well plate (Nunc #249952) in an ELMI Digital Thermos Microplates shaker incubator (Elmi Ltd, Riga, Latvia) at 1,000 r.p.m. and 37 °C. After 2 h of incubation, cells were diluted 1:10 into IM and cultured under the same shaking incubator parameters for 6 h. An aliquot (5 μl) of cell culture was added into 195 μl of phosphate-buffered saline with 0.5 mg ml−1 kanamycin to arrest cell growth and then analysed by flow cytometry. For measurement of promoter strength on a refactored plasmid, each refactored cluster was replaced with fluorescence protein: prg-org cluster with sfGFP on p15A plasmid and inv-spa with mRFP on pSC101 plasmid (Supplementary Fig. 19). Both plasmids were then introduced into DW01 strain harbouring a controller plasmid pMR_controller3. Upon induction by addition of 10 μM IPTG and AHL, promoter strength was reported as relative expression units, which were calculated by normalizing the sfGFP or mRFP output values by that measured from a reference standard. White-cell fluorescence measured from a strain lacking fluorescence protein was subtracted from measured fluorescence before normalization. DW01 strain harbouring PJ23101-sfGFP or PJ23101-mRFP was used as reference standard, respectively, which has a constitutive promoter (BBa_J23101) followed by a 5′ UTR (BBa_B0032) and sfGFP or mRFP (Supplementary Fig. 19).

Flow cytometry analysis

Data were obtained using an LSRII flow cytometer (BD Biosciences). All the data, consisting of up to 100,000 cells, were gated by forward and side scatter. The geometric mean values of fluorescence were calculated with FlowJo (TreeStar Inc.). White-cell fluorescence measured from a strain lacking fluorescence protein was subtracted.

Secretion assay

The overnight cultures in L-broth were diluted to an OD600 of 0.02 into 6 ml fresh L-broth in a 14 ml polypropylene round-bottom tube (Falcon #352059) and then grown for 2 h at 250 r.p.m. The cultures were diluted 1:10 into 50 ml IM in a 250 ml erlenmeyer flask, unless otherwise stated, containing antibiotics and inducers if necessary and grown at 37 °C for 6 h at 160 r.p.m. until the OD reached 1.8–2.5. Supernatants were prepared by filtration through the 0.2 μm filter unit (Nalgene, #180-1320) after centrifugation at 15,000 g for 3 min. The secreted proteins in supernatants were analysed by western blots against FLAG-tagged SptP, which was encoded on a reporter plasmid (pMR_reporter; Supplementary Fig. 16) or representative cytoplasmic protein, GroEL as a cell lysis control. For cultures grown in defined media, this procedure was followed except cells are grown in N salt minimal media (+10 mM MgCl2) overnight and diluted to OD600 of 0.2 in 50 ml of N salt minimal media (+8 μM MgCl2) containing antibiotics and inducers and grown at 37 °C for 8 h at 160 r.p.m. until the OD600 reached 1.0–1.4.

Western blot analysis

The supernatant was prepared in SDS sample buffer containing 0.2% β-mercaptoethanol and then run on 10% SDS-PAGE gel (Lonza #58502). The gels were transferred onto PVDF membrane (Biorad #162-0177) and then blocked for 1 h in 5% skim milk (w/v of TBST) at room temperature. The anti-Flag antibody (Sigma #F3165) or the anti-GroEL antibody (Sigma #G6532) was used as a primary antibody. Each antibody was added 1:2000 (v/v) into 2.5% skim milk (w/v of TBST) and then allowed to bind for 1 h at room temperature. The membranes were washed with TBST three times after each antibody-binding step. The HRP-conjugated anti-mouse antibody (Sigma #A8924) was used as a secondary antibody for the detection of Flag-tagged proteins, and for the detection of GroEL from supernatant as lysis control, the HRP-conjugated anti-rabbit antibody (Sigma #6154) was used as a secondary antibody. The secondary antibody (1:4,000) was incubated for 1 h at room temperature. After washing the membrane, the signal was developed by chemiluminescence for HRP (Pierce #32106) and detected using the Biorad chemidoc MP imaging system (#170-8280). Gel densitometry was done using ImageJ 1.41 (NIH). The relative secretion presented in Fig.4d,e was calculated as a percent intensity by dividing the intensity of the band by that measured for wild type and multiplying by 100. Uncropped images of blots are shown in Supplementary Fig. 23.

Quantitative western blot analysis

The titre of secreted FLAG-tagged SptP was determined by quantitative western blot using the Cy-5 conjugated secondary antibody (GE Healthcare Life Sciences #PA45009). The supernatant samples were prepared and run on the SDS-PAGE gel as described in western blot analysis. A standard curve was generated by running of carboxy-terminal FLAG-BAP Fusion Protein (Sigma #P7457) on the gel together with each sample. The gel was transferred onto Hybond low fluorescence PVDF membrane (AmershamBiosciences Cat#: RPN303LFP). After primary antibody binding followed by the washing step, the anti-mouse IgG-Cy-5 antibody was used as the secondary antibody. The secondary antibody was added 1:2,000 (v/v) and incubated for 1.5 h at room temperature. After washing the membrane, the membranes were dried and then the signal was imaged by the Biorad chemidoc MP imaging system. ImageJ was used to analyse gel densitometry. Protein quantities were determined using the standard curve and linear fit.

Immunoprecipitation and LC-MS

Native or synthetic coding sequence of spaO was amplified by PCR with 3′ primer containing 3x Flag sequences then cloned into pEXT-21 (ref. 64) by ligation of SacI–KpnI fragment (Supplementary Fig. 22). DW01 containing each plasmid was cultured under the same condition for secretion assay and the expression of native or synthetic spaO was induced by the addition of 1 mM IPTG into IM. Ten millilitres of each cell was harvested by centrifugation at 6,000g. Cell pellets were washed with lysis buffer (100 mM NaCl, 25 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0) and then resuspended in lysis solution containing Bugbuster (Novagen #70921) in buffer with 250 Units of Benzonase (Sigma #E1014). Unbroken cells were eliminated by centrifugation at 16,000g, 4 °C for 10 min. The cell lysates were analysed by western blot against the anti-Flag antibody and also applied to immunoprecipitation against anti-Flag M2 affinity gel (Sigma #A2220). As recommended by the manufacturer, the affinity resin was equilibrated by washing with Tris-buffered saline (TBS; 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl) twice and then resuspended in TBS. Cell lysates were mixed with equilibrated resin on a rocker at 4 °C for 2 h. Unbound proteins were eliminated by centrifugation at 8,000g for 30 s followed by washing with TBS. Supernatant was discarded using narrow-end pipette tip. For elution of bound proteins, 2 × SDS loading buffer without DTT was added into the mixture and then samples were boiled for 3 min. Undissolved resin was eliminated by centrifugation at 8,000g for 30 s. The sample was run on 4–20% gradient SDS-PAGE gel (Lonza #59551) and then the gel was stained with coomassie blue (Biorad #1610786). The band for small peptide (approximately 11–12 kDa), which was only from native spaO gene, was cut from the gel and then analysed (Biopolymers and Proteomics Core Facility at Koch institute in MIT). The excised band was subjected to in-gel disulfide reduction, cysteine alkylation with iodoacetamide and digestion with trypsin. Separation of proteolytic peptides was carried out by nanoflow high-performance liquid chromatography gradient elution using a capillary reversed phase C18 column. Peptides were analysed by LC-MS. Peptide molecular weight measurements and fragments ion mass spectra were obtained with a QSTAR Elite quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometer (Supplementary Data 1).

Needle complex purification and EM

The experiments were conducted with nonflagellated strain derived from DW01 strain (MR05: ΔflhDC). The needle complexes were isolated from ΔSPI-1 with prg-orgR5 and inv-spaR4 (Refactored SPI-1) and MR05 (WT: ΔflhDC). The growth conditions were same as for secretion assays as well as for the isolation of needle complex53 with several modifications. Briefly, cells were harvested after 6 h culture in IM and then harvested cells were resuspended in 150 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 0.5 M sucrose (Sigma-Aldrich #84097), 0.5 mg ml−1 hen egg lysozyme (Fluka #62971), 5 mM EDTA (AppliChem #A1103) and kept on ice for 45 min and then incubated at 37 °C for 15 min. Cells were lysed with 0.3% lauryldimethylamine oxide (LDAO; Sigma-Aldrich #40234) before adding 10 mM MgCl2 and 500 mM NaCl to the lysate. After removal of cell debris by low-speed centrifugation, needle complexes were pelleted by high-speed centrifugation (Beckman, 45Ti rotor, 140,000g, 4 h, 12 °C). The pellet was resuspended in 0.5% LDAO in 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 0.5 M NaCl, 5 mM EDTA and adjusted to a final concentration of 30% w/v of CsCl (amresco #0415). Two millilitres of resuspended samples were centrifuged for 12 h at 210,000g in a Beckman TLS-55 rotor. Half-millilitre aliquots were combined with 2.5 ml CsCl-free buffer and samples were pelleted in a TLA-110 rotor at 430,000g for 30 min. The complexes were resuspended in 0.1 ml 0.2% LDAO, 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 0.5 M NaCl and stored at 4 °C until image analysis. Western blot analysis of needle complex preparations was carried out with anti-needle complex antibody (NC). Thin carbon films were obtained by evaporating with an Edwards E306 machine onto mica sheet. One day before usage these films were floated onto 400 mesh hexagonal Cu/Pd-grids (3.05 mm; Agar Scientific #AGG2440PD). Samples was applied to glow-discharged grids and negatively stained with 2% phosphotungstic acid (Sigma-Aldrich #P4006) and then observed at × 56,000 nominal magnification with a Morgagni transmission electron microscope (FEI) operated at 80 kV. In addition, micrographs for image data processing were recorded on at a Tecnai T20 transmission electron microscope operated at 200 kV on a 4 K-CCD at nominal magnification of 50,000 resulting in 2.18 Angstrom/pixel or a Polara FEI transmission electron microscope set at 300 keV and a nominal magnification of 59,000 (2.09 Angstroem/pixel) microscope. Image data processing, including determination of the contrast transfer function and 2D-classification, was performed using the software CTFFIND3 and RELION, respectively65,66. In addition, isolated needle complex was also analysed by western blot analysis against anti-needle complex antibody.

Data availability

The authors declare that all data supporting this study are available within the article and its Supplementary Information file or are available from the corresponding author upon request. All RNA-seq data are available in Sequence Read Archive (Accession codes: SRR5176473, SRR5176472).

Additional information

How to cite this article: Song, M. et al. Control of type III protein secretion using a minimal genetic system. Nat. Commun. 8, 14737 doi: 10.1038/ncomms14737 (2017).

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.


  1. 1

    Chevance, F. F. V. & Hughes, K. T. Coordinating assembly of a bacterial macromolecular machine. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 6, 455–465 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Flores-Kim, J. & Darwin, A. J. Links between type III secretion and extracytoplasmic stress responses in Yersinia. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 2, 125 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Galán, J. E., Lara-Tejero, M., Marlovits, T. C. & Wagner, S. Bacterial type III secretion systems: specialized nanomachines for protein delivery into target cells. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 68, 415–438 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Upadhyaya, N. M., Ellis, J. G. & Dodds, P. N. A bacterial type III secretion-based delivery system for functional assays of fungal effectors in cereals. Methods Mol. Biol. Clifton NJ 1127, 277–290 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Almario, J., Gobbin, D., Défago, G., Moënne-Loccoz, Y. & Rezzonico, F. Prevalence of type III secretion system in effective biocontrol pseudomonads. Res. Microbiol. 165, 300–304 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Singer, H. M. et al. Selective purification of recombinant neuroactive peptides using the flagellar type III secretion system. mBio. 3, e00115–12 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Widmaier, D. M. et al. Engineering the Salmonella type III secretion system to export spider silk monomers. Mol. Syst. Biol. 5, 309 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Widmaier, D. M. & Voigt, C. A. Quantification of the physiochemical constraints on the export of spider silk proteins by Salmonella type III secretion. Microb. Cell Fact. 9, 78 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Xu, X. et al. Effective cancer vaccine platform based on attenuated Salmonella and a type III secretion system. Cancer Res. 74, 6260–6270 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Marlovits, T. C. et al. Structural insights into the assembly of the type III secretion needle complex. Science 306, 1040–1042 (2004).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Schraidt, O. & Marlovits, T. C. Three-dimensional model of Salmonella’s needle complex at subnanometer resolution. Science 331, 1192–1195 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Chevance, F. F. V. et al. The mechanism of outer membrane penetration by the eubacterial flagellum and implications for spirochete evolution. Genes Dev. 21, 2326–2335 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Sukhan, A., Kubori, T., Wilson, J. & Galán, J. E. Genetic analysis of assembly of theSalmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium type III secretion-associated needle complex. J. Bacteriol. 183, 1159–1167 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Wagner, S. et al. Organization and coordinated assembly of the type III secretion export apparatus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 107, 17745–17750 (2010).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Sturm, A. et al. The cost of virulence: retarded growth of Salmonella Typhimurium cells expressing type III secretion system 1. PLoS Pathog 7, e1002143 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Singer, H. M., Kühne, C., Deditius, J. A., Hughes, K. T. & Erhardt, M. The Salmonella Spi1 virulence regulatory protein HilD directly activates transcription of the flagellar Master Operon flhDC. J. Bacteriol. 196, 1448–1457 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Diard, M. et al. Stabilization of cooperative virulence by the expression of an avirulent phenotype. Nature 494, 353–356 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Galán, J. E. & Curtiss, R. Cloning and molecular characterization of genes whose products allow Salmonella typhimurium to penetrate tissue culture cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 86, 6383–6387 (1989).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Lee, C. A., Jones, B. D. & Falkow, S. Identification of a Salmonella typhimurium invasion locus by selection for hyperinvasive mutants. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 89, 1847–1851 (1992).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Srikanth, C. V., Mercado-Lubo, R., Hallstrom, K. & McCormick, B. A. Salmonella effector proteins and host-cell responses. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 68, 3687–3697 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Burkinshaw, B. J. & Strynadka, N. C. J. Assembly and structure of the T3SS. Biochim. Biophys. Acta BBA—Mol. Cell Res. 1843, 1649–1663 2014.

  22. 22

    Golubeva, Y. A., Sadik, A. Y., Ellermeier, J. R. & Slauch, J. M. Integrating global regulatory input into the Salmonella pathogenicity Island 1 type III secretion system. Genetics 190, 79–90 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Ellermeier, C. D., Ellermeier, J. R. & Slauch, J. M. HilD, HilC and RtsA constitute a feed forward loop that controls expression of the SPI1 type three secretion system regulator hilA in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. Mol. Microbiol. 57, 691–705 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Lucas, R. L. & Lee, C. A. Unravelling the mysteries of virulence gene regulation in Salmonella typhimurium. Mol. Microbiol. 36, 1024–1033 (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Kröger, C. et al. An infection-relevant transcriptomic compendium for Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. Cell Host Microbe. 14, 683–695 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Button, J. E. & Galán, J. E. Regulation of chaperone/effector complex synthesis in a bacterial type III secretion system. Mol. Microbiol. 81, 1474–1483 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    López-Garrido, J., Puerta-Fernández, E. & Casadesús, J. A eukaryotic-like 3′ untranslated region in Salmonella enterica hilD mRNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, 5894–5906 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Cameron, A. D. S. & Dorman, C. J. A fundamental regulatory mechanism operating through OmpR and DNA topology controls expression of Salmonella pathogenicity Islands SPI-1 and SPI-2. PLoS Genet. 8, e1002615 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Ali, S. S. et al. Silencing by H-NS potentiated the evolution of salmonella. PLoS Pathog. 10, e1004500 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30

    Zaslaver, A., Mayo, A., Ronen, M. & Alon, U. Optimal gene partition into operons correlates with gene functional order. Phys. Biol. 3, 183 (2006).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31

    Løvdok, L. et al. Role of translational coupling in robustness of bacterial chemotaxis pathway. PLoS Biol. 7, e1000171 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32

    Smanski, M. J. et al. Functional optimization of gene clusters by combinatorial design and assembly. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 1241–1249 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33

    Price, M. N., Arkin, A. P. & Alm, E. J. The life-cycle of operons. PLoS Genet. 2, e96 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34

    Chan, L. Y., Kosuri, S. & Endy, D. Refactoring bacteriophage T7. Mol. Syst. Biol. 1, 2005.0018 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35

    Temme, K., Zhao, D. & Voigt, C. A. Refactoring the nitrogen fixation gene cluster from Klebsiella oxytoca. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 7085–7090 (2012).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36

    Lara-Tejero, M., Kato, J., Wagner, S., Liu, X. & Galán, J. E. A sorting platform determines the order of protein secretion in bacterial type III systems. Science 331, 1188–1191 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37

    Temme, K., Hill, R., Segall-Shapiro, T. H., Moser, F. & Voigt, C. A. Modular control of multiple pathways using engineered orthogonal T7 polymerases. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, 8773–8781 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38

    Brophy, J. A. N. & Voigt, C. A. Principles of genetic circuit design. Nat. Methods 11, 508–520 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39

    Klein, J. R., Fahlen, T. F. & Jones, B. D. Transcriptional organization and function of invasion genes within Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium pathogenicity Island 1, Including the prgH,prgI, prgJ, prgK, orgA,orgB, and orgC genes. Infect. Immun. 68, 3368–3376 (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40

    Marlovits, T. C. et al. Assembly of the inner rod determines needle length in the type III secretion injectisome. Nature 441, 637–640 (2006).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41

    Lou, C., Stanton, B., Chen, Y.-J., Munsky, B. & Voigt, C. A. Ribozyme-based insulator parts buffer synthetic circuits from genetic context. Nat. Biotechnol. 30, 1137–1142 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42

    Eichelberg, K., Ginocchio, C. C. & Galán, J. E. Molecular and functional characterization of the Salmonella typhimurium invasion genes invB and invC: homology of InvC to the F0F1 ATPase family of proteins. J. Bacteriol. 176, 4501–4510 (1994).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43

    Yu, X.-J., Liu, M., Matthews, S. & Holden, D. W. Tandem translation generates a chaperone for the Salmonella type III secretion system protein SsaQ. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 36098–36107 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44

    Bzymek, K. P., Hamaoka, B. Y. & Ghosh, P. Two translation products of Yersinia yscQ assemble to form a complex essential to type III secretion. Biochemistry (Mosc.) 51, 1669–1677 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45

    McDowell, M. A. et al. Characterisation of Shigella Spa33 and Thermotoga FliM/N reveals a new model for C-ring assembly in T3SS. Mol. Microbiol. 99, 749–766 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46

    Fadouloglou, V. E. et al. Structure of HrcQB-C, a conserved component of the bacterial type III secretion systems. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 101, 70–75 (2004).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47

    Kubori, T. & Galán, J. E. Salmonella type III secretion-associated protein InvE controls translocation of effector proteins into host cells. J. Bacteriol. 184, 4699–4708 (2002).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48

    Thijs, I. M. V. et al. Delineation of the Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium HilA regulon through genome-wide location and transcript analysis. J. Bacteriol. 189, 4587–4596 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49

    Petrone, B. L., Stringer, A. M. & Wade, J. T. Identification of HilD-regulated genes in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. J. Bacteriol. 196, 1094–1101 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50

    Pfeiffer, V. et al. A small non-coding RNA of the invasion gene island (SPI-1) represses outer membrane protein synthesis from the Salmonella core genome. Mol. Microbiol. 66, 1174–1191 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51

    Deiwick, J., Nikolaus, T., Erdogan, S. & Hensel, M. Environmental regulation of Salmonella pathogenicity island 2 gene expression. Mol. Microbiol. 31, 1759–1773 (1999).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52

    Bourret, T. J., Song, M. & Vázquez-Torres, A. Codependent and independent effects of nitric oxide-mediated suppression of PhoPQ and Salmonella pathogenicity Island 2 on intracellular Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium survival. Infect. Immun. 77, 5107–5115 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53

    Radics, J., Königsmaier, L. & Marlovits, T. C. Structure of a pathogenic type 3 secretion system in action. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 21, 82–87 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54

    Kalir, S. et al. Ordering genes in a Flagella pathway by analysis of expression kinetics from living bacteria. Science 292, 2080–2083 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55

    Chilcott, G. S. & Hughes, K. T. Coupling of flagellar gene expression to flagellar assembly in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium and Escherichia coli. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 64, 694–708 (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56

    Yerushalmi, G., Litvak, Y., Gur-Arie, L. & Rosenshine, I. Dynamics of Expression and Maturation of the Type III Secretion System of Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 196, 2798–2806 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57

    Hueck, C. J. Type III Protein Secretion Systems in Bacterial Pathogens of Animals and Plants. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 62, 379–433 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. 58

    Ellermeier, J. R. & Slauch, J. M. Adaptation to the host environment: regulation of the SPI1 type III secretion system in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 10, 24–29 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59

    Iber, D. A quantitative study of the benefits of co‐regulation using the spoIIA operon as an example. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2, 43 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60

    Datsenko, K. A. & Wanner, B. L. One-step inactivation of chromosomal genes in Escherichia coli K-12 using PCR products. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 97, 6640–6645 (2000).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61

    Zomer, A. L. PPP: Perform Promoter Prediction. Available at (2011).

  62. 62

    Studholme, D. (2011) PromScan Available at (Accessed October 27, 2010).

  63. 63

    Kingsford, C. L., Ayanbule, K. & Salzberg, S. L. Rapid, accurate, computational discovery of Rho-independent transcription terminators illuminates their relationship to DNA uptake. Genome Biol. 8, R22 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64

    Dykxhoorn, D. M. St, Pierre, R. & Linn, T. A set of compatible tac promoter expression vectors. Gene 177, 133–136 (1996).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65

    Mindell, J. A. & Grigorieff, N. Accurate determination of local defocus and specimen tilt in electron microscopy. J. Struct. Biol. 142, 334–347 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66

    Scheres, S. H. W. RELION: implementation of a Bayesian approach to cryo-EM structure determination. J. Struct. Biol. 180, 519–530 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67

    Bailly-Bechet, M. et al. An externally modulated, noise-driven switch for the regulation of SPI1 in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. J. Math. Biol. 63, 637–662 (2011).

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68

    Prajapat, M. K. & Saini, S. Interplay between Fur and HNS in controlling virulence gene expression in Salmonella typhimurium. Comput. Biol. Med. 42, 1133–1140 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


This work is supported by NIHR01-AI067699 and NIHP50-GM098792; National Science Foundation (SA5284-11210 grant to the Synthetic Biology Research Center); Pew Foundation. D.B.G. was supported by the US Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) Living Foundries grant HR0011-13-1-0001. T.C.M was generously supported through the Behörde für Wissenschaft, Forschung und Gleichstellung of the city of Hamburg. Electron Micrograph samples were recorded at the EM facility of the Vienna Biocenter Core Facilities GmbH (VBCF), Austria.

Author information




M.S., D.J.S., E.A.M. and C.A.V. designed the experiments. M.S. and C.A.V. wrote the manuscript. M.S., D.J.S., E.A.M. and A.C.T. performed the experiments and analysed the data. L.C., J.M., J.F.R. and T.C.M. performed needle complex isolation and analysis. D.B.G. performed the genome sequencing and genotype analysis.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher A. Voigt.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figures, Supplementary Tables, Supplementary Notes, and Supplementary References (PDF 24470 kb)

Supplementary Dataset 1

LC-MS analysis of small spaO peptide (SpaOs). (XLS 41 kb)

Peer Review File (PDF 305 kb)

Rights and permissions

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Song, M., Sukovich, D., Ciccarelli, L. et al. Control of type III protein secretion using a minimal genetic system. Nat Commun 8, 14737 (2017).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing