Article | Open

Iron isotopic fractionation between silicate mantle and metallic core at high pressure

Published online:


The +0.1‰ elevated 56Fe/54Fe ratio of terrestrial basalts relative to chondrites was proposed to be a fingerprint of core-mantle segregation. However, the extent of iron isotopic fractionation between molten metal and silicate under high pressure–temperature conditions is poorly known. Here we show that iron forms chemical bonds of similar strengths in basaltic glasses and iron-rich alloys, even at high pressure. From the measured mean force constants of iron bonds, we calculate an equilibrium iron isotope fractionation between silicate and iron under core formation conditions in Earth of 0–0.02‰, which is small relative to the +0.1‰ shift of terrestrial basalts. This result is unaffected by small amounts of nickel and candidate core-forming light elements, as the isotopic shifts associated with such alloying are small. This study suggests that the variability in iron isotopic composition in planetary objects cannot be due to core formation.


Iron, as one of the most abundant non-volatile elements in the Solar System, plays a major role in every stage of planetary formation and differentiation. Much information can be gained on these processes by studying iron isotopic variations1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8. A striking feature of the Earth is the manner in which it is stratified into a core dominated by metallic Fe0, a mantle that is rich in ferrous Fe2+, and surface oxidative environments where iron is found mostly as ferric Fe3+ (ref. 9). Understanding how this stratification was established has important bearing on several questions in Earth and planetary sciences, such as the nature of the material accreted by the Earth as a function of time10,11 and the cause for the Great Oxygenation Event12. The abundance and redox state of iron in Earth’s mantle reflects the redox conditions that prevailed during and after core formation13,14. Iron isotopes add a new dimension to this system but progress in interpreting Fe isotope variations has been hampered by the paucity of equilibrium isotopic fractionation factors under the P–T conditions relevant to core formation.

Mid-ocean ridge basalts (MORBs), which constitute the bulk of Earth’s oceanic crust, are enriched in the heavy isotopes of iron by +0.1‰ relative to chondrites (ref. 6; δ56Fe is the deviation in permil of the 56Fe/54Fe ratio relative to the IRMM-014 standard, whose composition is indistinguishable from chondrites). In contrast, basalts from Mars and Vesta have the same δ56Fe value as chondrites within uncertainty2,4,5,15,16. The non-chondritic Fe isotope composition of terrestrial basalts has been interpreted as resulting from iron vaporization into space during the Moon-forming giant impact2, high-temperature and high-pressure equilibrium fractionation between metal and silicate during core formation7,8, or iron isotopic fractionation during partial mantle melting to produce Earth’s crust17,18,19,20. Supporting the last explanation is the observation that mantle peridotites have an iron isotopic composition that is close to that of chondrites17,19. However, mantle peridotites are imperfect proxies of the mantle composition, as they have been affected by partial melting and metasomatism17,21,22, which can fractionate Fe isotopes.

To test the core-mantle segregation mechanism and set constraints on the conditions of core formation, it is critical to know how iron isotopes are partitioned at equilibrium between metal and silicate under conditions relevant to core formation. Previous studies have investigated metal-silicate Fe isotopic fractionation at high temperature and relatively low pressure, reaching the conclusion that the fractionation would be negligible23,24. However, pressure is an important intensive parameter that affects the strength of iron bonds and the structure of silicates, so iron isotopic fractionation between silicate and metal might differ at high pressure7,25.

Polyakov7 used previously published results from nuclear resonant inelastic X-ray scattering spectroscopy (NRIXS) to conclude that the equilibrium iron isotopic fractionation between metallic iron and silicate post-perovskite under Earth’s core-mantle boundary conditions may be sufficiently large to impart a measurable isotopic shift to the mantle. The NRIXS data used to support this claim are of insufficient precision at the low- and high-energy ends of the spectrum to derive reliable force constant values20. Furthermore, silicate post-perovskite would not be stable in the hot lowermost mantle of early Earth26 and its role in setting the present Fe isotopic signature of MORBs is uncertain.

Shahar et al.25 investigated iron isotope fractionation between bridgmanite and iron alloys (FeO, FeHx and Fe3C) at pressures relevant to core formation in a typical magma ocean setting, up to 60 GPa, by using NRIXS spectroscopy complemented by theoretical calculations. They found that the effect of pressure on iron isotopic composition is different among iron-light element alloys investigated. Notably, the δ56Fe value of the current terrestrial mantle would be fractionated by +0.02‰ relative to the bulk Earth composition for a pure iron core and this fractionation would increase to +0.04‰ for an FeHx or Fe3C core. Hydrogen and carbon are, however, unlikely major light element candidates in Earth’s core27,28. Oxygen is more probable but Shahar et al.25 showed that it would induce a limited shift in the Fe isotopic composition of the mantle (+0.02‰).

The studies done so far have focused on crystalline phases as analogues to the magma ocean silicate melt7,25. Furthermore, the effects of Si, S (two of the major light element candidates in the Earth’s core) and Ni alloying with Fe on iron isotopic fractionation remain uncertain. Therefore, it is crucial to examine iron isotopic fractionation between silicate glasses of basaltic composition and iron-rich alloys of Fe-Ni-Si, Fe-Si and Fe-S, to evaluate whether core formation could have fractionated the iron isotopic composition of Earth’s mantle.

Here we report the experimental determination of the mean force constant of iron bonds in synthetic samples of basaltic glass, metallic iron and iron-rich alloys of Fe-Ni-Si, Fe-Si and Fe-S up to 206 GPa. We find that all values increase with pressure, and that the values of silicate glass are comparable to those of metal. Our results suggest that the interplanetary variability in iron isotopic composition cannot be due to core formation.


Experimental approach

We studied the high-pressure equilibrium Fe isotopic fractionation between basaltic glass and Fe-rich Fe-Ni-Si, Fe-Si and Fe-S solid alloys (taken as proxies for molten silicates29,30,31 and alloys, respectively) using NRIXS spectroscopy with samples loaded in diamond anvil cells (DACs)7,32. NRIXS gives the mean force constant of iron bonds , from which reduced partition function ratios or β-factors can be deduced through32,

The β-factors give the extent to which 56Fe/54Fe ratios are fractionated between coexisting phases at equilibrium,

The starting samples were a fully reduced 57Fe-enriched basaltic glass containing only Fe2+ (ref. 20), polycrystalline Fe and Fe86.8Ni8.6Si4.6, Fe85Si15 and Fe3S alloys33,34,35. Conventional Mössbauer spectroscopic data, electron microprobe analyses and NRIXS data collected on the basaltic glass at ambient conditions were reported elsewhere20. Metal iron and the iron-based alloys were examined by X-ray diffraction and most were in a body-centred cubic structure at ambient conditions, except for Fe3S, which was in the tetragonal structure. The reported values for Fe92Ni8, Fe85Si15 and Fe3S are based on newly acquired NRIXS data combined with previous data from Lin et al.34,35, who did not report the values for Fe92Ni8 and Fe85Si15. For previously acquired data, the uncertainties on the values are large due to the relatively narrow energy scans acquired, as those studies focused on the determination of the Debye sound velocity for seismological applications.

Although the phases relevant to core formation conditions are molten, direct measurements of vibrational properties on silicate and metallic liquids under ultrahigh pressure conditions are currently beyond experimental capabilities. Still, the behaviours of silicate melts under high P–T conditions can be understood by examining silicate glasses, because both exhibit similar microscopic and macroscopic properties29,30. For instance, the inelastic vibrational properties of silicate glasses are close to their molten counterparts36 and changes in the Si–O coordination number of molten basalt are in excellent agreement with those observed in silica glass at pressures up to 60 GPa (ref. 37). Similarly, for lack of better alternatives, crystalline iron is often used as proxy for molten iron in deep Earth studies. Molten iron is described as a simple close-packed liquid38 and exhibits comparable density and compressibility relative to its solid phase under core conditions39. As a first pass on this question and following Polyakov7 and Shahar et al.25, we take the values of iron bonds in solid Fe and Fe-rich alloys to be proxies of those in their liquid counterparts. We use new data for the most relevant candidate light elements Si and S, and for the main alloying element Ni, together with literature data for FeHx, Fe3C and FeO alloys from Shahar et al.25, to fully evaluate how alloying and light elements affect iron β-factors of pure iron under high-P, T conditions.

High-T harmonic extrapolation

Measurements of the force constant of iron bonds at room temperature were used to calculate the iron β-factors using equation (1), which assumes harmonic behaviour7,20,25,32,40 (see Methods). At the high temperatures relevant to core formation on Earth, the iron β-factors could be affected by anharmonic effects, but such effects may be largely suppressed by the associated high pressures7. Furthermore, theoretical caculations25,41,42,43 support the validity of the harmonic approximation for calculation of β-factors at high temperatures. For instance, the correction on the iron β-factors between 0 K and mantle temperatures is thought to be negligible25. NRIXS predictions have previously been shown to be in agreement with independent determination of equilibrium fractionation factors based on mass spectrometry analyses of coexisting phases thought to have achieved equilibrium. This is the case for magnetite and olivine at 873–1,073 K (refs 40, 44). This is also the case for basaltic glass and iron, for which NRIXS data20 agree with equilibration experiments performed in the molten silicate-metal system at 1,573 K and 1 GPa (ref. 24), and 2,273 K and 7.7 GPa (ref. 23). These agreements support the use of solid phases (silicate glass and crystalline alloys) as proxies for melts.

Iron isotopic fractionation between Earth’s mantle and core

The values of iron bonds of all investigated phases increase considerably with pressure (Fig. 1). The values of iron bonds in basaltic glass increase by 40% from 26 to 35 GPa (Fig. 1a), likely to be associated with the formation of tricluster oxygens29 and structural change37 in silicate glasses and melts. In contrast, no obvious discontinuity is observed in the values of the alloys, which define linear trends with pressure (Fig. 1b–d). Even for Fe86.8Ni8.6Si4.6, no significant offset is measured when the alloy transitions from body-centred cubic to hexagonal close-packed at 20 GPa (Fig. 1c). The values of pure iron reported in the present study are identical within uncertainty to those of iron derived from NRIXS and theoretical calculations by Shahar et al.25 In details, however, the values calculated from a fit to their data are systematically greater than ours by 12 N m−1, which corresponds to a negligible difference of 0.003‰ in predicted β-factors at 3,500 K (Fig. 1b).

Figure 1: Force constants of iron bonds in basaltic glass and Fe and iron-rich alloys as a function of pressure.
Figure 1

Black and blue solid squares, black solid diamonds, and black and magenta solid circles: basaltic glass (a), Fe (b), Fe85Si15 (c), Fe86.8Ni8.6Si4.6 (c) and Fe3S (d), respectively, from this study (Supplementary Table 2); half-filled diamonds, circles and squares: values for Fe92Ni8, Fe85Si15 and Fe3S evaluated based on the NRIXS data from Lin et al.34,35 using the SciPhon software; open square and diamonds: bridgmanite and Fe reported by Shahar et al.25; dashed line: bridgmanite reported by Rustad and Yin56. The error bars are 95% confidence intervals. Each high-pressure data point was measured at least 20 times and as many as 47 times. Solid lines: linear fits to the data for the basaltic glass, Fe and iron-rich alloys. Note the large shift in value of the basaltic glass (a) at 30 GPa, which corresponds to structural changes in the glass29,37.

Linear fits to measured values versus P were calculated (Table 1), from which one can calculate the β-factor of basaltic glass, pure iron and Fe-rich alloy at any P–T conditions (Supplementary Figs 4 and 5). The quantity that we are interested in is the fractionation between metal and silicate under the conditions relevant to core formation conditions (40–60 GPa and 3,000–4,000 K for single-stage equilibration45,46,47). The silicate β-factor is given by the basaltic glass. For metal, the β-factor may be influenced by the composition of the alloy, which is shown in Figs 2 and 3 at a reference value of 3,500 K and variable pressures. Except for FeHx, the predicted 1,000 ln β-values of the alloys are within ±0.01‰ of the pure Fe value.

Table 1: Pressure dependence of the force constant values of iron bonds in basaltic glass and Fe-rich alloys.
Figure 2: Comparisons of β-factors of iron-rich alloys at high pressure and temperature.
Figure 2

Difference in the 56Fe/54Fe β-factors of iron-rich alloys with respect to pure iron at 3,000 K (a) and 4,000 K (b) as a function of pressure. Magenta, blue, grey and olive solid lines: Fe86.8Ni8.6Si4.6, Fe85Si15, Fe92Ni8 and Fe3S alloys, respectively, from this study. Purple, grey and olive dashed lines: FeO, Fe3C and FeHx, respectively, from Shahar et al.25 Δ56FeAlloy-Fe56FeAlloy−δ56FeFe=1,000 × (ln βAlloy56/54Fe−ln βFe56/54Fe). Black dash-dotted lines represent no iron isotopic fractionation between Fe-rich alloys and pure iron.

Figure 3: Equilibrium 56Fe/54Fe isotope fractionation between basaltic glass and iron-rich alloys at high pressure and temperature.
Figure 3

a. Pressure at 40 GPa. b. Pressure at 60 GPa. Black, magenta, blue, grey and olive solid lines: Fe, Fe86.8Ni8.6Si4.6, Fe85Si15, Fe92Ni8, and Fe3S alloys, respectively, from this study. Purple, grey and olive dashed lines: FeO, Fe3C and FeHx, respectively, from Shahar et al.25 Δ56FeBasalt-Alloy56FeBasalt−δ56FeAlloy. Blue dash-dotted lines represent no iron isotopic fractionation between basaltic glass and Fe-rich alloys.


The temperature of metal-silicate equilibration in the early Earth is uncertain, because it is usually calculated from the pressure of equilibration assuming that Earth’s mantle was close to the liquidus temperature of the silicate. The liquidus temperature itself is uncertain and it is possible that the silicate mantle was superheated in the aftermath of giant impacts, so that the temperatures were higher than those given by the liquidus48. Previous studies on the partitioning behaviour of moderately siderophile elements constrain the pressure–temperature conditions for high-pressure core formation in the Earth to be 40–60 GPa and 3,000–4,000 K, possibly accompanying deep magma oceans extending to >1,000 km depth45,46,47. In the Earth, 87% of the iron inventory is in the core, meaning that the silicate-metal equilibrium fractionation would be expressed in the mantle. Assuming a chondritic bulk Earth composition, the shift imposed on the mantle δ56Fe value by core formation would depend on the alloy composition (Fig. 4).

Figure 4: Predicted shifts in the iron isotopic composition of the silicate mantle due to core formation.
Figure 4

Schematics for δ56Fe isotope signatures in the bulk silicate Earth (primitive mantle) with regard to varying compositional models of Earth’s core. The segregating metal was assumed to equilibrate with the silicate mantle at the base of the magma ocean at 50 GPa and 3,500 K based on refs 45, 46, 47.

The theoretically derived iron β-factor of bridgmanite obtained by Shahar et al.25 are larger by 20% than the β-factor measured on the basaltic glass at 40–60 GPa. As a result, the fractionation values that they calculated were systematically heavier than ours by 0.01–0.02‰ at approximately 40–60 GPa and 3,500 K. For instance, for the Fe-C core model, the calculated δ56FeMantle value is +0.01–0.03‰ using basaltic glass data from the present study, whereas Shahar et al.25 calculated a δ56FeMantle value of +0.03–0.05‰ based on first-principles calculations of iron β-factor of bridgmanite. Although we agree with Shahar et al.25 that FeHx and Fe3C would lead to the largest shifts in δ56Fe values, we find that the shift would be smaller than what they predicted by 0.01–0.02‰.

Earth’s core is unlikely to contain much H and C27,28 and the most probable alloying elements, in addition to Ni, are O, Si and S. Our results agree with the conclusion by Shahar et al.25 that FeO alloy would induce a negligible shift in the δ56Fe value of the mantle (Fig. 4). An important conclusion of the present work is that other alloys of Fe-S, Fe-Si and Fe-Ni-Si would also produce minimal isotopic fractionation in the silicate mantle relative to the bulk Earth. The inferred core-mantle Fe isotopic fraction at 40–60 GPa and 3,000–4,000 K for O, Si and S alloys is approximately five to ten times smaller than the observed Fe isotope composition for MORBs (δ56Fe of +0.1‰ relative to chondrites)6. Our results thus indicate that high-pressure mantle-core equilibration cannot be responsible for the heavy Fe isotopic composition measured in basalts (Fig. 4). Therefore, our results reveal that the Fe isotopic composition of the mantle is representative of the bulk Earth and provides a baseline with which to compare the composition of extraterrestrial samples.

Our results also have some bearing on the iron isotopic compositions of rocks from Mars (SNC meteorites), Vesta (HED meteorites) and the angrite parent body. The P–T conditions of core formation in those planetary bodies are inferred to be 6 GPa–1,900 K for Mars49, 0.0001 GPa–1,873 K for Vesta49 and <0.5 GPa–2,173 K for the angrite parent body50. Under these conditions, we calculate that as on Earth, the equilibrium iron isotopic fractionation should be small (<0.02‰). Even if significant S is present in cores of these bodies, the results for Fe3S indicate that the fractionation would be minimal. This is consistent with the fact that SNC and HED meteorites have near-chondritic Fe isotopic compositions2,15. It does not explain, however, the heavy Fe isotopic composition of angrites (+0.1‰ relative to chondrites)51. In that case, other interpretations must be sought, which based on Si isotope systematics may involve isotopic fractionation during condensation in the solar nebula52 or impact-induced vaporization53. The emerging picture from this study supports the notion that core formation of planetary bodies in the Solar System is unlikely to fractionate significantly stable isotope ratios for elements such as Si, Cr and Fe. Other processes such as gas–solid fractionation in the nebula, impact-induced vaporization, or magma generation must be responsible for explaining the isotopic diversity of terrestrial and extraterrestrial rocks.


Sample synthesis

As the NRIXS technique is only sensitive to the Mössbauer isotope 57Fe, phases enriched in this isotope were synthesized in the laboratory from almost pure 57Fe-oxide and metal. The 57Fe-enriched tholeiitic basalt glass sample was synthesized from a mixture of SiO2, Al2O3, CaCO3, MgO, Na2CO3, K2CO3, TiO2 and Fe-enriched Fe2O3 in vertical gas mixing furnaces at the University of Lille and at CRPG-Nancy (France). The oxygen fugacity (fO2) was controlled using CO/CO2 gas mixtures. The chemical composition and homogeneity of the glass was examined using electron microprobe and Mössbauer spectroscopy. Its composition is Na0.036Ca0.220Mg0.493Fe0.115Al0.307Ti0.012K0.002Si0.834O3 with Fe3+/Fetotal<0.02 (see ref. 20 for more details of the synthesis process). The pure Fe powder sample (with an enrichment of >95% 57Fe) was purchased from Cambridge Isotope Laboratories, Inc. The Fe-rich Fe86.8Ni8.6Si4.6 alloy was synthesized from a mixture of powder Fe, Ni and Si in an arc furnace in a pure Ar atmosphere at the Max Planck Institute for Solid State Research, Stuttgart, and Bayerisches Geoinstitut, University of Bayreuth33. The >95% 57Fe-enriched Fe85Si15 alloy was synthesized from a homogeneous mixture of Fe and Si by arc melting at the Advanced Photon Source, Argonne National Laboratory, USA34. The 65% 57Fe-enriched Fe3S sample was synthesized from the starting materials of 57Fe-enriched iron and troilite (FeS) in a multianvil apparatus at the Geophysical Laboratory, Carnegie Institution of Washington35.

High-pressure synchrotron NRIXS experiments

We conducted in situ high-pressure NRIXS experiments on basaltic glass, Fe and Fe-rich alloys in DACs up to 206 GPa at sector 3ID-B of the Advanced Photon Source, Argonne National Laboratory (Supplementary Fig. 1). Each 57Fe-enriched sample was separately loaded into a sample chamber drilled into a beryllium gasket in a panoramic DAC. The starting samples of approximately 10–15 μm in thickness and 30 μm in diameter were loaded into panoramic DACs with culet sizes ranging from 50 to 400 μm in diameter, with Be gaskets of 3 mm in diameter and cubic boron nitride gasket inserts. For the basaltic glass, Fe and Fe-Ni-Si alloy, each NRIXS spectrum was scanned around the nuclear transition energy of 57Fe with a step size of 0.25 meV and a collection time of 5 s per energy step with an energy resolution of 1 meV. For the Fe-S and Fe–Si alloys, the scan step size was increased to 0.5 meV with an energy resolution of 2 meV, to increase the count rate for the inelastic peaks. Each NRIXS scan took about 1–1.5 h. Owing to the dilute Fe content in the basalt glass sample and the extended energy acquisition range, 20–47 NRIXS scans (approximately 2–3 days of beamtime) per pressure were collected and combined in order to achieve good statistics. All the NRIXS measurements were made at room temperature (300 K). A broad energy range (for example, from −110 to +140 meV for the basaltic glass) was scanned at high pressures, which is important to capture multiphonon contributions and possible high-energy vibration modes for the reliable determination of values20 (Supplementary Table 1). Pressure was calibrated using the ruby scale54 for the basaltic glass, Fe and Fe alloys below 70 GPa. Above 70 GPa, the Raman spectra of the diamond anvils were collected for use as a pressure gauge before and after each measurement55. The pressure was cross-checked with the previously characterized equation of state of Fe and Fe-Ni-Si alloy33.

SciPhon software and data analysis

We applied a new approach based on moment calculations of NRIXS scattering spectra S(E) using the SciPhon software, as this method allows a better assessment of measurement uncertainties and potential systematic errors than using moments of the phonon density of states32,41. In the quasiharmonic lattice model, the third moment R3 of a measured NRIXS spectrum S(E) is used to calculate the mean force constant of iron bonds in the samples (in N/m)32,41:

where M is the mass of the nuclear resonant isotope (57Fe in this study), E is the energy difference between incident X-ray and the nuclear resonance E0 (in meV) and is the free recoil energy (that is, 1.956 meV for the E0=14.4125, keV nuclear transition of 57Fe). Within the harmonic approximation, the β-factors and the equilibrium isotope fractionation between two phases A and B at high temperature (>500 K; ref. 32) can be calculated from given above using the following relations20,32:


where is the permil difference in isotopic ratios (56Fe/54Fe) of phases A and B at equilibrium (that is, if those phases were juxtaposed and the isotopes of iron partitioned between them according to the laws of equilibrium thermodynamics), k is Boltzmann’s constant, ħ is the reduced Planck constant and T is temperature. The mean force constants <F> of iron bonds in the samples were calculated from NRIXS spectra using the SciPhon software, which includes a correction for non-constant baseline. The uncertainties on the force constant measurements (95% confidence interval, comprising both systematic and random errors) are 5–10%. The <F> values from SciPhon agree with PHOENIX but those from PHOENIX without baseline subtraction appear more scattered (Supplementary Figs 2 and 3). Several parameters that can be calculated from NRIXS data by using SciPhon, have been compiled in Supplementary Table 2, including estimates of the Lamb–Mössbauer factor, kinetic energy per atom, force constant, internal energy, vibrational specific heat, vibrational entropy, critical temperature, sound velocities (Debye, compressional-wave and shear-wave) and coefficients of the polynomial used to calculate β-factors at any temperature.

Data availability

The data sets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available as Supplementary Information and from the corresponding authors.

Additional information

How to cite this article: Liu, J. et al. Iron isotopic fractionation between silicate mantle and metallic core at high pressure. Nat. Commun. 8, 14377 doi: 10.1038/ncomms14377 (2017).

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.


  1. 1.

    & Fe isotope variations in the modern and ancient earth and other planetary bodies. Rev. Mineral. Geochem. 55, 319–357 (2004).

  2. 2.

    , , , & Iron isotope differences between Earth, Moon, Mars and Vesta as possible records of contrasted accretion mechanisms. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 223, 253–266 (2004).

  3. 3.

    et al. Iron isotope fractionation and the oxygen fugacity of the mantle. Science 304, 1656–1659 (2004).

  4. 4.

    et al. Iron isotope fractionation during planetary differentiation. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 240, 251–264 (2005).

  5. 5.

    & Modes of planetary-scale Fe isotope fractionation. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 252, 342–359 (2006).

  6. 6.

    , , & Iron isotopic systematics of oceanic basalts. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 107, 12–26 (2013).

  7. 7.

    Equilibrium iron isotope fractionation at core-mantle boundary conditions. Science 323, 912–914 (2009).

  8. 8.

    , , , & Isotopic evidence for internal oxidation of the Earth’s mantle during accretion. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 321–322, 54–63 (2012).

  9. 9.

    & The redox state of Earth’s mantle. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 36, 389–420 (2008).

  10. 10.

    et al. Heterogeneous accretion, composition and core–mantle differentiation of the Earth. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 301, 31–42 (2011).

  11. 11.

    , & Accretion of the Earth and segregation of its core. Nature 441, 825–833 (2006).

  12. 12.

    , & Rise of atmospheric oxygen and the ‘upside-down’ Archean mantle. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 2, 1025 (2001).

  13. 13.

    , , & The redox state of the mantle during and just after core formation. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 366, 4315–4337 (2008).

  14. 14.

    & Core formation and the oxidation state of the Earth. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 236, 78–95 (2005).

  15. 15.

    et al. Iron isotope fractionation in planetary crusts. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 89, 31–45 (2012).

  16. 16.

    , , & On the iron isotope composition of Mars and volatile depletion in the terrestrial planets. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 449, 360–371 (2016).

  17. 17.

    & Partial melting and melt percolation in the mantle: The message from Fe isotopes. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 259, 119–133 (2007).

  18. 18.

    et al. Iron isotopes may reveal the redox conditions of mantle melting from Archean to Present. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 288, 255–267 (2009).

  19. 19.

    , & Abyssal peridotites reveal the near-chondritic Fe isotopic composition of the Earth. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 365, 63–76 (2013).

  20. 20.

    et al. Magma redox and structural controls on iron isotope variations in Earth’s mantle and crust. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 398, 127–140 (2014).

  21. 21.

    , , , & Iron isotope variations in spinel peridotite xenoliths from North China Craton: Implications for mantle metasomatism. Contr. Mineral. Petrol 160, 1–14 (2010).

  22. 22.

    , & On the iron isotope heterogeneity of lithospheric mantle xenoliths: Implications for mantle metasomatism, the origin of basalts and the iron isotope composition of the Earth. Contr. Mineral. Petrol 165, 1243–1258 (2013).

  23. 23.

    , & No iron isotope fractionation between molten alloys and silicate melt to 2000 °C and 7.7 GPa: Experimental evidence and implications for planetary differentiation and accretion. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 278, 376–385 (2009).

  24. 24.

    , & Experimental evidence for the absence of iron isotope fractionation between metal and silicate liquids at 1 GPa and 1250–1300 °C and its cosmochemical consequences. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 93, 164–181 (2012).

  25. 25.

    et al. Pressure-dependent isotopic composition of iron alloys. Science 352, 580–582 (2016).

  26. 26.

    , & A doubling of the post-perovskite phase boundary and structure of the Earth’s lowermost mantle. Nature 434, 882–886 (2005).

  27. 27.

    The influence of hydrogen on the seismic properties of solid iron. Geophys. Res. Lett. 42, 3780–3785 (2015).

  28. 28.

    , & Carbon in the core: Its influence on the properties of core and mantle. Rev. Mineral. Geochem. 75, 231–250 (2013).

  29. 29.

    et al. X-ray Raman scattering study of MgSiO3 glass at high pressure: Implication for triclustered MgSiO3 melt in Earth’s mantle. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 7925–7929 (2008).

  30. 30.

    et al. High-pressure radiative conductivity of dense silicate glasses with potential implications for dark magmas. Nat. Commun. 5, 5428 (2014).

  31. 31.

    & Spectroscopic evidence for pressure-induced coordination changes in silicate glasses and melts. Science 239, 902–905 (1988).

  32. 32.

    et al. A general moment NRIXS approach to the determination of equilibrium Fe isotopic fractionation factors: application to goethite and jarosite. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 94, 254–275 (2012).

  33. 33.

    et al. Seismic parameters of hcp-Fe alloyed with Ni and Si in the Earth’s inner core. J. Geophys. Res. 121, 610–623 (2016).

  34. 34.

    et al. Sound velocities of iron-nickel and iron-silicon alloys at high pressures. Geophys. Res. Lett. 30, 2112 (2003).

  35. 35.

    et al. Magnetic transition and sound velocities of Fe3S at high pressure: Implications for Earth and planetary cores. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 226, 33–40 (2004).

  36. 36.

    & Silicate Glasses and Melts: Properties and Structure 544, Elsevier Science (2005).

  37. 37.

    et al. Structural change in molten basalt at deep mantle conditions. Nature 503, 104–107 (2013).

  38. 38.

    , & Structure and dynamics of liquid iron under Earth’s core conditions. Phys. Rev. B 61, 132–142 (2000).

  39. 39.

    , , , & Physics of iron at Earth’s core conditions. Science 287, 1027–1030 (2000).

  40. 40.

    et al. Spinel–olivine–pyroxene equilibrium iron isotopic fractionation and applications to natural peridotites. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 169, 184–199 (2015).

  41. 41.

    , , , & Moments in nuclear resonant inelastic x-ray scattering and their applications. Phys. Rev. B 87, 064301 (2013).

  42. 42.

    et al. Reduced partition function ratios of iron and oxygen in goethite. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 151, 19–33 (2015).

  43. 43.

    , , , & Determination of tin equilibrium isotope fractionation factors from synchrotron radiation experiments. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 69, 5531–5536 (2005).

  44. 44.

    , & Equilibrium high-temperature Fe isotope fractionation between fayalite and magnetite: an experimental calibration. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 268, 330–338 (2008).

  45. 45.

    & Geochemistry of mantle-core differentiation at high pressure. Nature 381, 686–689 (1996).

  46. 46.

    , , , & Mechanisms of metal-silicate equilibration in the terrestrial magma ocean. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 205, 239–255 (2003).

  47. 47.

    , , & Metal–silicate partitioning of Ni and Co in a deep magma ocean. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 321–322, 189–197 (2012).

  48. 48.

    et al. Solidus and liquidus profiles of chondritic mantle: implication for melting of the Earth across its history. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 304, 251–259 (2011).

  49. 49.

    & Core formation in Earth’s Moon, Mars, and Vesta. Icarus 124, 513–529 (1996).

  50. 50.

    Siderophile element depletion in the angrite parent body (APB) mantle: due to core formation? Lunar Planet. Sci. Confer. 39, 1936 (2008).

  51. 51.

    et al. Iron isotopic compositions of angrites and Stannern-trend eucrites. Lunar Planet. Sci. Confer. 43, 1146 (2012).

  52. 52.

    , , , & Planetary and meteoritic Mg/Si and δ30Si variations inherited from solar nebula chemistry. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 427, 236–248 (2015).

  53. 53.

    , , , & Silicon isotopes in angrites and volatile loss in planetesimals. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 17029–17032 (2014).

  54. 54.

    , & Calibration of the ruby pressure gauge to 800 kbar under quasi-hydrostatic conditions. J. Geophys. Res. 91, 4673–4676 (1986).

  55. 55.

    & Pressure calibration of diamond anvil Raman gauge to 410 GPa. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 215, 012195 (2010).

  56. 56.

    & Iron isotope fractionation in the Earth’s lower mantle. Nat. Geosci. 2, 514–518 (2009).

Download references


We thank L. Dubrovinsky for providing the 57Fe-enriched Fe86.8Ni8.6Si4.6 alloy sample and Y. Fei for providing the 57Fe-enriched Fe3S sample. We thank J. Yang for experimental assistance and I. Kuang for assisting with editing the manuscript. J.-F.L. acknowledges support from the US National Science Foundation Geophysics and CSEDI Programs as well as the Center for High Pressure Science and Technology Advanced Research (HPSTAR). HPSTAR is supported by NSAF (Grant Number U1530402). N.D. acknowledges support from NSF (Cooperative Studies of the Earth’s Deep Interior, EAR150259; Petrology and Geochemistry, EAR144495) and NASA (Laboratory Analysis of Returned Samples, NNX14AK09G; Cosmochemistry, OJ-30381-0036A and NNX15AJ25G). M.R. acknowledges support from the French ANR (2011JS56 004 01, FrIHIDDA). W.B. acknowledges the support from the Consortium for Materials Properties Research in Earth Sciences (COMPRES), the National Science Foundation (NSF) through Grant Number DMR-1104742. We acknowledge GSECARS and HPCAT of the Advanced Photon Source for use of the diffraction and ruby facilities. This research used resources of the Advanced Photon Source, a US Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Science User Facility operated for the DOE Office of Science by Argonne National Laboratory under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357. We thank three anonymous reviewers for providing very constructive comments and suggestions.

Author information

Author notes

    • Jin Liu

    Present address: Department of Geological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA


  1. Department of Geological Sciences, Jackson School of Geosciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, USA

    • Jin Liu
    •  & Jung-Fu Lin
  2. Origins Laboratory, Department of the Geophysical Sciences and Enrico Fermi Institute, The University of Chicago, 5734 South Ellis Avenue, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA

    • Nicolas Dauphas
    •  & Justin Y. Hu
  3. IMPMC–UMR CNRS 7590, Sorbonne Universités, UPMC, IRD, MNHN, Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, 61 rue Buffon, 75005 Paris, France

    • Mathieu Roskosz
  4. Advanced Photon Source, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 60439, USA

    • Michael Y. Hu
    • , Wenli Bi
    • , Jiyong Zhao
    •  & Esen E. Alp
  5. Center for High Pressure Science and Technology Advanced Research (HPSTAR), Pudong, Shanghai 201203, China

    • Hong Yang
    •  & Jung-Fu Lin
  6. Department of Geology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801, USA

    • Wenli Bi


  1. Search for Jin Liu in:

  2. Search for Nicolas Dauphas in:

  3. Search for Mathieu Roskosz in:

  4. Search for Michael Y. Hu in:

  5. Search for Hong Yang in:

  6. Search for Wenli Bi in:

  7. Search for Jiyong Zhao in:

  8. Search for Esen E. Alp in:

  9. Search for Justin Y. Hu in:

  10. Search for Jung-Fu Lin in:


J.-F.L., J.L., N.D. and M.R. designed the project. M.R. synthesized the glass sample. J.L., H.Y., M.Y.H., W.B., J.Z., E.E.A. and J.-F.L. conducted most high-pressure NRIXS experiments. M.R., N.D. and J.Y.H. conducted some high-pressure NRIXS experiments on basaltic glass up to 5 GPa. J.L. and N.D. analysed the data and J.L. modelled the results. J.L. wrote the draft and all authors contributed to the revision of the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jin Liu or Nicolas Dauphas or Jung-Fu Lin.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    Supplementary Figures and Supplementary Tables

Excel files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Data 1

    Supplementary Dataset for Supplementary Figures 6-8


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit