Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

P113 is a merozoite surface protein that binds the N terminus of Plasmodium falciparum RH5


Invasion of erythrocytes by Plasmodium falciparum merozoites is necessary for malaria pathogenesis and is therefore a primary target for vaccine development. RH5 is a leading subunit vaccine candidate because anti-RH5 antibodies inhibit parasite growth and the interaction with its erythrocyte receptor basigin is essential for invasion. RH5 is secreted, complexes with other parasite proteins including CyRPA and RIPR, and contains a conserved N-terminal region (RH5Nt) of unknown function that is cleaved from the native protein. Here, we identify P113 as a merozoite surface protein that directly interacts with RH5Nt. Using recombinant proteins and a sensitive protein interaction assay, we establish the binding interdependencies of all the other known RH5 complex components and conclude that the RH5Nt-P113 interaction provides a releasable mechanism for anchoring RH5 to the merozoite surface. We exploit these findings to design a chemically synthesized peptide corresponding to RH5Nt, which could contribute to a cost-effective malaria vaccine.


Malaria is a deadly infectious disease caused by Plasmodium parasites which is responsible for up to one million deaths annually, primarily in young children living in sub-Saharan Africa1. Malaria symptoms result from the blood stages of P. falciparum infections when a form of the parasite called the merozoite recognizes and invades host erythrocytes where it replicates asexually2. Since invasion is an essential and extracellular step in the parasite lifecycle, it may be targeted by vaccine-induced antibodies3. After initial recognition of the host erythrocyte, the pear-shaped merozoite orientates itself so that its apical protuberance is in direct apposition to the host membrane. This triggers the subsequent release of parasite invasion ligands from intracellular secretory organelles including the micronemes and rhoptries3,4. An electron-dense nexus between the host and parasite membranes is formed which opens out into a ring-like moving junction which envelops the merozoite, finally resealing behind it, such that the parasite is completely internalized within an intraerythrocytic parasitophorous vacuole5. The whole process is rapid, taking just a few seconds6. The biochemical interactions involved in invasion are being identified, and their roles in each of these steps determined4. Of particular current interest is the interaction between the parasite reticulocyte-binding protein homologue 5 (RH5) and its erythrocyte receptor, basigin7.

RH5 was first identified by searching the P. falciparum genome sequence for homology with the sequences of other RH family members, and the inability to select RH5-deficient parasites in vitro suggested it was required for blood-stage growth8. The role of RH5 as an invasion ligand was established by the identification of basigin as its erythrocyte receptor, and the demonstration that the RH5-basigin interaction was both essential and universally required for invasion9. RH5 is detected within the rhoptries of merozoites, relocating to the moving junction during invasion8. Live imaging in the presence of fluorescent calcium-sensitive dyes and RH5-basigin interaction antagonists revealed that merozoites could still adhere and deform erythrocytes leading to the conclusion that the RH5-basigin interaction was necessary for, and directly preceded, rhoptry release just before the formation of the moving junction4. The protein sequence of RH5 is conserved between strains10, can elicit antibodies that inhibit parasite growth in vitro11,12,13,14, and RH5-based vaccines are protective in a non-human primate P. falciparum infection model15. These properties of RH5 have made a deeper understanding of its mechanism of action a priority but many basic questions remain unanswered. For example, the lack of any obvious protein sequence feature for anchoring RH5 to a membrane suggests the existence of another mechanism for tethering RH5 to the merozoite surface. In addition, RH5 is detected in parasite culture supernatants as both full length (RH5FL, −63kDa) and processed (RH5Ct, −45 kDa) forms but the function of this processing is unknown8. Peptide sequencing of purified recombinant RH5 and anti-RH5 antibodies with known epitope locations revealed that RH5Ct lacks the N-terminal region (RH5Nt), which is predicted to be disordered8,16,17,18. RH5Ct folds into a ‘kite’-like shape19,20 and contains a small (1,500 Å2) binding interface for basigin, consistent with the low interaction affinity (KD 1 μM)9, leaving much of its solvent-exposed surface available for simultaneous binding with other proteins. Size separation of parasite proteins from culture supernatants by gel filtration revealed that RH5 is part of a larger (200 kDa) complex, that includes two other parasite proteins: RIPR (RH5 interacting protein)16 and CyRPA (cysteine-rich protective antigen)21. Both RIPR and CyRPA are predicted to be secreted proteins16,22 (although see ref. 21) which suggests that they do not tether RH5 to the merozoite surface. Because these proteins were identified from bulk parasite extracts as purified complexes, we do not know whether RIPR and CyRPA bind RH5 directly, nor whether they interact in a mutually exclusive fashion. One further intriguing and unanswered question in relation to the function of RH5 is the role of its N terminus (RH5Nt), which is absent from the processed form of RH5 detected in parasite culture supernatants. This region is predicted to be highly disordered and flexible, to such a degree that it was purposefully removed to promote crystal formation for structural studies19,20. Despite this, RH5Nt is particularly well conserved with just a single non-synonymous polymorphism described at very low frequency (<1%) in African isolates13, and contains the epitope for a potent invasion-blocking monoclonal antibody18 demonstrating RH5Nt has an important role in RH5 function.

Here we use a sensitive assay that detects interactions between recombinant proteins to show that the glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-linked protein P113 interacts directly with the N terminus of unprocessed RH5, providing a mechanism by which the RH5 invasion complex is tethered to the merozoite surface. We additionally determine the binding interdependencies between the individual components of the RH5-basigin invasion complex, which, together with RH5 processing, suggests the existence of a one-way switching mechanism that releases the RH5 complex from the merozoite surface during erythrocyte invasion by P. falciparum.


The N terminus of RH5 has no role in basigin binding

The Plasmodium falciparum RH5 protein is detected as full length and processed forms in both parasite culture supernatants and when expressed recombinantly in either mammalian13 or insect cells20. To identify the sites of processing when expressed in mammalian cells, RH5 was purified, resolved as four bands by SDS–PAGE, and the N terminus of each determined by Edman protein sequencing. The major band (RH5Ct) was consistent with the main processed form of RH5 observed in parasite supernatants (Fig. 1a) and its N terminus is close (14 amino acids C-terminal) to the cleavage site observed when RH5 is expressed in insect cells20. The largest band matched the expected mass of the full-length unprocessed protein (RH5FL) and this was confirmed by protein sequencing (Fig. 1a). To determine which of the processed forms were able to interact with the basigin receptor, we made recombinant forms of RH5 corresponding to each of these fragments and tested their ability to bind basigin using a protein interaction assay designed to detect low-affinity extracellular protein interactions called AVEXIS (for AVidity-based EXtracellular protein Interaction Screen23) (Fig. 1b). Consistent with the co-crystal structure of RH5 with its receptor, we observed that RH5Ct bound basigin, whereas RH5Nt did not (Fig. 1b). We used surface plasmon resonance (SPR) to show that RH5Ct bound with similar binding parameters to the full-length RH5 protein9 (Supplementary Table 1; Fig. 1c). Altogether, these data demonstrate that the N-terminal region of RH5 does not play a direct role in basigin binding.

Figure 1: The N-terminal domain of RH5 is not involved in basigin binding.

(a) Purified tagged recombinant RH5 expressed by HEK293 cells resolved as four species by SDS–PAGE under reducing conditions. The N-terminal sequence of each species was determined by Edman degradation and is shown. (b) The N-terminal region of RH5 is not involved in basigin binding. The indicated RH5 fragments were expressed as biotinylated bait proteins and probed for interactions with a highly avid β-lactamase-tagged basigin prey protein using the AVEXIS assay. The full length (FL) and the major processed form (RH5Ct) of RH5 bound basigin but the N-terminal region (RH5Nt) did not. Bars represent means±95% confidence intervals; n=3. (c) Biophysical analysis of the RH5Ct-basigin interaction. Serial dilutions of the indicated concentrations of purified RH5Ct protein were injected over the biotinylated ectodomain of basigin immobilized on a streptavidin-coated sensor chip. The data showed excellent fits to a simple (1:1) binding model (red line). The binding parameters of RH5Ct did not differ significantly from those obtained from RH5FL (Supplementary Table 1) demonstrating that the N-terminal region of RH5 does not contribute to basigin binding affinity.

P113 interacts with the N terminus of RH5

We reasoned that the cleaved N-terminal region of RH5 might form a distinct binding domain, and because antibodies to this region have shown potent parasite inhibitory activity18, could be important for RH5 function. One possible role would be to tether RH5 to the surface of the merozoite by interacting with another membrane-anchored parasite protein. We therefore used RH5Nt expressed as a highly avid, pentamerized, enzyme-tagged ‘prey’ and the AVEXIS assay to systematically screen an existing library of full-length recombinant P. falciparum merozoite ‘bait’ proteins24,25. In total, we screened 39 different parasite proteins which included the known parasite RH5-interacting partners RIPR and CyRPA. We reproducibly identified an interaction with a merozoite protein called P113; no interactions with either RIPR or CyRPA were detected (Fig. 2a). P113 was initially discovered in a study designed to identify GPI-anchored merozoite proteins by purifying detergent-resistant membrane proteins from mature blood-stage parasites26, and was subsequently found to be one of the most abundant proteins isolated from high molecular mass complexes on the merozoite27. P113 has been detected at other stages of the lifecycle including the sporozoite28 and gametocyte29, and the inability to select P113-deficient parasites suggests that it is essential for blood-stage growth2. An informative and rapid validation test for interactions detected using the AVEXIS approach is to determine whether the interaction is dependent on the bait-prey orientation23. To establish this, we expressed the entire ectodomain of P113 as an avid prey, and showed that it could interact with both RH5Nt and RH5FL, but not RH5Ct (Fig. 2b). We further demonstrated this interaction by showing that RH5Nt but not control RH5Ct-coated beads could purify native P113 from parasite culture lysates (Fig. 2c). Using antibodies against P113, we could show that it is expressed in early and late-stage schizonts and on the surface of free merozoites by co-staining with the established merozoite surface markers MSP9 (Fig. 2d) and MSP1 (Supplementary Fig.1a), findings that are consistent with an independent study30. Antibodies to P113, unlike those to a marker of the inner membrane complex (MTIP), stained both permeabilized and unpermeabilized merozoites demonstrating P113 is surface localized (Supplementary Fig.1b). These data identify P113 as an RH5 interacting partner at the merozoite surface and a new member of the RH5 complex.

Figure 2: The N-terminal domain of RH5 interacts with the merozoite surface protein P113.

(a) The N-terminal domain of RH5 (RH5Nt, F1-K116) was expressed as a pentameric, β-lactamase-tagged prey protein and systematically tested for interactions against a library of recombinant P. falciparum merozoite receptor ectodomains and secreted bait proteins using the AVEXIS assay; a single interaction with P113 was observed. (b) The P113-RH5Nt interaction detected in the reciprocal orientation using a P113 prey against RH5 baits. Bars in (a,b) represent means±95% confidence intervals; n=3; controls were RH5FL-basigin (+ve) and Cd4d3+4 tag alone (−ve). (c) Biochemical purification of native P113 from P. falciparum cultures with RH5Nt but not control RH5Ct-coated agarose beads. Parasite lysates were incubated with beads coated in either RH5Nt or RH5Ct protein, washed, and eluates resolved by SDS–PAGE under reducing conditions, blotted and probed with anti-P113 antibody. (d) P113 is expressed in schizonts and on the surface of free merozoites. Fixed blood-stage P. falciparum schizonts and free merozoites were probed with anti-P113 antibodies (green), the merozoite surface marker anti-MSP9 (red) and nucleic acid stained with DAPI (blue). Scale bars, 3 μm.

Mapping the P113-RH5 interaction interface

We next asked which region within RH5Nt contained the P113 binding site. Using a series of truncated RH5Nt recombinant proteins and the AVEXIS assay, we determined a minimal P113 binding region corresponding to a linear sequence of 19 amino acids that bound P113 indistinguishably from RH5Nt (Fig. 3a). To similarly demonstrate where on P113 the RH5 binding site was located, a series of truncated P113 expression constructs, based on both predicted subtilisin cleavage sites31 and the location of structurally important cysteine pairings were tested for RH5FL binding (Fig. 3b). The smallest region of P113 that could be expressed, and which retained the ability to bind RH5 encompassed a cluster of 14 cysteine residues at the N terminus of P113 (Fig. 3b). These data identify that the P113 interaction site on RH5 is encompassed within a short linear sequence of just 19 amino acids.

Figure 3: The P113-RH5 interaction interface involves a short linear sequence in RH5Nt and the cysteine-rich N-terminal domain of P113.

(a) The P113 interaction interface on RH5 was mapped to 19 amino acids located within the N terminus of RH5. Fragments of RH5Nt that could be expressed as prey proteins are depicted schematically and were tested for their ability to bind a P113 bait protein by AVEXIS. The K9-K27 fragment represented the minimal binding region. (b) The RH5 interaction interface on P113 was mapped to the N terminus corresponding to a cysteine-rich region encompassed by Y1-K197. Fragments of P113, including the entire ectodomain (EE), that could be expressed as bait proteins are depicted schematically as in a with the approximate locations of the 16 cysteines marked by vertical bars. The proteins were tested for their ability to bind an RH5 prey protein by AVEXIS. Bars represent means±95% confidence intervals n=3; the experiment shown is one of two independent experiments.

P113 binds RH5Nt and with higher affinity to RH5FL

To confirm that RH5 and P113 interact directly and to quantify the biophysical parameters of the interaction, we used SPR. RH5Nt was expressed as a soluble recombinant protein, purified, and serial dilutions injected over P113 immobilized on a sensor chip. Saturable binding was observed demonstrating the specificity of the interaction from which an equilibrium binding constant (KD) of 3.0±0.5 μM (mean±s.d., n=2) was derived (Fig. 4a). Independent kinetic parameters were in agreement with the equilibrium data (Fig. 4b), and although weak, they were within the expected range of many extracellular interactions measured using this technique32. Interestingly, the affinity of the interaction was 10-fold higher (KD0.3 μM) when full-length RH5 protein was used as the analyte by comparison to the N-terminal region alone (Fig. 4c). To investigate this in more detail, and remove possible measurement inaccuracies due to the use of different analytes, we measured the biophysical binding parameters in the reverse orientation by using purified P113 as the analyte. We observed that the purified P113 entire ectodomain resolved with a broad profile by size-exclusion chromatography (SEC) with the peak eluting earlier than expected for a monomeric protein suggesting that the ectodomain of P113 self-associated (Fig. 4d). Resolving the fractions corresponding to the elution peak by denaturing and non-denaturing PAGE revealed apparent masses of 130 and 500 kDa respectively, consistent with the formation of tetrameric complexes (Fig. 4e). Analysis of the P113 protein sequence identified a probable coiled-coil region at the C terminus of the protein33 and similar sequence features have been implicated in the tetramerization of other merozoite proteins such as MSP334. As expected, when the oligomeric P113 complexes were used as analytes in SPR experiments, the shape of the binding curves indicated complex multivalent binding to RH5 immobilized on the sensor chip, which dissociated slowly (Fig. 4f). In an attempt to measure monomeric binding of P113 to RH5Nt for direct comparisons of biophysical binding parameters, we observed that one of the highly-expressed P113 fragments that lacked the predicted coiled-coil region at the C terminus (Y1-N653, Fig. 3b) eluted in much later fractions by SEC (Fig. 4d,e), and when used as the analyte, this truncated form of P113 bound to RH5FL with monophasic binding characteristics and the same ten-fold higher interaction affinity compared to RH5Nt (Fig. 4g, Supplementary Table 1). A kinetic analysis of the interaction confirmed that the higher binding affinity of RH5FL compared to RH5Nt is mainly due to a slower (approximately fourfold) dissociation rate constant, but a higher (approximately twofold) association rate constant also contributes (Supplementary Table 1). We also performed a thermodynamics analysis of the RH5-P113 interaction using SPR which showed that the interaction was entropically driven and that the entropic contribution was higher for RH5FL compared to RH5Nt providing an explanation for the 10-fold higher affinity of RH5FL for P113 in comparison to RH5Nt (Supplementary Fig. 2). This suggests that the N terminus of RH5 may be partially ordered or in some way structurally constrained when in proximity to the C terminus of RH5, and that the interaction with P113 would release RH5Nt from this restraint thereby causing an overall increase in disorder and consequently a more favourable entropic contribution upon P113 binding. To put these values into context, RH5FL binds P113 with an approximately three-fold higher binding affinity than it binds to the basigin receptor9, and approximately three-fold lower once processed. Together, these data suggest P113 clusters, probably as tetramers, at the merozoite surface via a membrane-proximal coiled coil region, and binds the N terminus of RH5 with an affinity that is reduced around 10-fold after processing.

Figure 4: The interaction between P113 and the N-terminal region of RH5 is specific and 10-fold stronger in the context of full-length RH5.

(a) RH5Nt bound P113 specifically and with low affinity. Purified monomeric RH5Nt was serially diluted before being injected over 780 RU of monobiotinylated P113 immobilized on a streptavidin-coated sensor chip. The binding traces suggested the presence of a small amount of multimeric material (see Methods); consequently, binding equilibrium was not quite achieved even though long (>60 s) injection times were used; the dashed line (inset) marks the time point used for equilibrium binding. From these data, an equilibrium binding constant (KD) of 3.0±0.5 μM (mean±s.d., n=2) was calculated. (b,c) RH5FL binds P113 with a ten-fold higher affinity than RH5Nt. A kinetic analysis of P113 binding RH5Nt (b) or RH5FL (c) using SPR; inset gels demonstrate the homogeneity and integrity of each RH5 analyte preparation. Serially diluted RH5 analytes were injected over 780 RU of immobilized P113. Binding data (black lines) fitted a simple 1:1 binding model well (red lines), and were used to determine binding constants. (d) Gel filtration elution profiles of the entire ectodomain (EE) and an N-terminal subfragment (Y1-N653) of recombinant tagged P113 demonstrated that P113 EE can form multimers. The lettered dashed lines correspond to fractions collected over the resolved peaks; the elution volumes of gel filtration mass markers are indicated. (e) Native and denaturing (SDS–PAGE) gels corresponding to aliquots of the fractions indicated by the letters in d. P113 EE but not the Y1-N653 fragment resolves at an approximately fourfold higher mass under native when compared with denaturing conditions. The Y1-N653 fragment resolved as two species by native PAGE. Multimeric forms of P113 EE exhibited complex multivalent binding behaviour by SPR (f) compared with P113 Y1-N653 (g). Sensorgrams in (f,g) show a 120 s pulse of purified 8 μM P113 analyte injected over 510 RU of immobilized RH5Nt.

RH5 directly interacts with P113 and CyRPA but not RIPR

The identification of P113 adds another component to the RH5 invasion complex that is known to include the merozoite proteins CyRPA21 and RIPR16, which both co-immunoprecipitate with RH5 from parasite supernatants. Identifying protein complexes using this method does not immediately establish which proteins directly interact with each other, nor whether the components can bind simultaneously. To address these questions, we used our collection of recombinant P. falciparum merozoite proteins expressed in mammalian cells24,25 together with the AVEXIS assay. Previously, we have shown that direct binary interactions can be detected using this approach between RH5FL/Ct and basigin (Fig. 1b and9) as well as RH5FL/Nt and P113 (Fig. 2b). Screening the merozoite protein library with an RH5FL pentameric ‘prey’ identified the expected interactions with both P113 and CyRPA baits demonstrating direct binding of RH5 with each of these proteins (Supplementary Fig. 3a). We additionally determined that the CyRPA binding site on RH5 was located in the RH5Ct fragment since RH5Ct but not RH5Nt bound CyRPA (Supplementary Fig. 3b). The same interactions were detected when the bait-prey orientations were reversed with RH5FL presented as a monomeric ‘bait’—an important validation criteria used for AVEXIS assays (Supplementary Fig. 3c). We did not observe any other interactions with RH5FL, including RIPR (Supplementary Fig. 3a,c). CyRPA, however, did directly interact with RIPR (Supplementary Fig. 3b) suggesting that CyRPA bridges the interaction between RH5 and RIPR. No direct interactions were detected between P113 and either CyRPA or RIPR (Supplementary Fig. 3d). Altogether, these data establish that P113 and CyRPA bind directly to RH5 while RIPR is associated with RH5 through a mutual interaction with CyRPA.

RH5-CyRPA-RIPR complex interacts with basigin but not P113

Given the essential role of the RH5 complex in invasion, we sought to address the interaction dependencies of each component of the RH5 complex with one another. We again took advantage of our recombinant proteins and AVEXIS assay, but this time attempted to induce binding between non-interacting baits and preys by titrating in additional components of the complex. We first established that a basigin prey could be captured by a P113 bait by adding increasing concentrations of purified monomeric RH5FL, but not RH5Ct or RH5Nt (Fig. 5a). This demonstrated that RH5FL was able to bind both P113 and basigin simultaneously, consistent with them interacting with distinct regions of RH5. Similarly, RH5FL (but not RH5Ct or RH5Nt) could form a trimeric complex involving CyRPA and P113 (Fig. 5b). RH5FL and RH5Ct—but not RH5Nt—could interact simultaneously with CyRPA and basigin indicating that their respective interaction interfaces do not overlap in the C-terminal region of RH5 (Fig. 5c). Consistent with all these data, the formation of the basigin-RH5-P113 complex could be detected in the presence of CyRPA (Fig. 5d). We next showed that an RH5FL prey could be captured by a RIPR bait only by adding increasing concentrations of purified CyRPA (Fig. 5e), which provided an explanation for why RIPR did not directly interact with RH5 but is co-purified with RH5 from parasite supernatants16. We next asked whether the complex of the three parasite proteins RH5, CyRPA and RIPR could interact with either the erythrocyte or merozoite-tethered receptors. Interestingly, while an interaction could be detected with basigin, we were unable to detect interactions with P113 (Fig. 5f). Altogether, these results suggest that RH5-CyRPA-RIPR complexes containing either RH5FL or RH5Ct can bind the erythrocyte receptor basigin, but not the merozoite tethering molecule P113.

Figure 5: The RH5-CyRPA-RIPR complex can interact with basigin but not P113.

The binding interdependencies of the proteins within the RH5 invasion complex with basigin and P113 were determined using modified AVEXIS assays. The indicated purified monomeric components of the RH5 complex were titrated into binding reactions between the named baits and β-lactamase-tagged preys, which do not interact directly, and any resulting prey binding quantified by measuring the hydrolysis of a colorimetric β-lactamase substrate at 485 nm. Binding data are shown on the left panels with their interpretations shown schematically on the right. RH5FL can simultaneously bind P113 and basigin (a), CyRPA and P113 (b), and CyRPA and basigin (c). (d) The basigin-RH5FL-P113 complex is not overtly affected by the addition of CyRPA; here, the RH5FL monomer concentration was titrated with CyRPA held constant at 0.3 μM. (e) RH5FL prey could be captured on a RIPR bait by addition of purified CyRPA. (f) The RH5FL-CyRPA-RIPR complex interacted with basigin, but not P113 preys; here, the CyRPA monomer concentration was titrated with RH5FL held constant at 0.2 μM. Binding data points represent means±95% confidence interval (n=3); a representative experiment from at least two independent experiments is shown.

During the preparation of this manuscript, a report describing the RH5-CyRPA interaction was published showing that immunoprecipitated CyRPA was labelled by the addition of radioactively labelled glucosamine and mannose, suggesting that CyRPA is post-translationally modified by addition of a GPI anchor21. To try and confirm this, we took advantage of the fact that P. falciparum proteins can be appropriately modified with GPI anchors when expressed in mammalian cells35. By contrast to P113—which was used as a positive control—we did not find any evidence that CyRPA was GPI-anchored and surface localized (Supplementary Fig. 4). Our findings are consistent with the initial prediction that CyRPA is a secreted protein22 and the absence of CyRPA-derived peptides from detergent-resistant P. falciparum schizont membrane fractions that are enriched in GPI-anchored proteins27. During the late stages of revising this manuscript for publication, another study has directly shown that CyRPA is not GPI-anchored36.

An RH5Nt amph-vaccine elicits invasion-blocking antibodies

Because the RH5 N-terminal region is relatively short and predicted to be unstructured, we asked whether a chemically synthesized peptide could elicit invasion-blocking antibodies and therefore be a component of a cost-effective vaccine. A peptide corresponding to the first 116 amino acids of RH5 was synthesized with an additional C-terminal cysteine for chemical coupling. We first showed that the synthetic peptide structurally mimicked RH5Nt by showing it retained the ability to bind P113 with almost identical biophysical binding parameters to RH5Nt (Fig. 6a; Supplementary Table 1). Conjugating peptides to amphiphilic compounds that contain both hydrophobic albumin-binding acyl lipid chains and a solubilizing hydrophilic PEG spacer have been shown to improve immune presentation by promoting lymph node accumulation through ‘albumin hitchhiking’37. We therefore covalently coupled the peptide corresponding to RH5Nt to a maleimide-functionalized PEG2000-DSPE molecule (Fig. 6b) to create an amph-vaccine37. Polyclonal antibodies against this compound elicited good antibody titres (Supplementary Fig. 5) that prevented RH5 binding to P113 (Fig. 6c), but not basigin (Fig. 6d). The antibodies inhibited parasite growth in vitro, an effect that was observed in both 3D7 and Dd2 parasite strains, and specifically affected schizont to ring stage progression demonstrating that they inhibited erythrocyte invasion (Fig. 6e and Supplementary Fig. 6). These data suggest that a peptide based on the N-terminal region of RH5 would be an effective and inexpensive component of a malaria vaccine.

Figure 6: An ‘amph-vaccine’ based on RH5Nt elicits antibodies that inhibit parasite growth in vitro.

(a) A synthetic 116 amino-acid peptide corresponding to RH5Nt interacts with P113. Serial dilutions of purified P113 (Y1-N653) were injected over the RH5Nt peptide immobilized on a streptavidin-coated sensor chip after the C-terminal cysteine was conjugated to biotin functionalized with maleimide. Reference-subtracted binding data are shown (black lines) which fit well to a 1:1 binding model (red lines). (b) Structure of an ‘amph-vaccine’ based on RH5Nt created by conjugating the RH5Nt peptide to maleimide-functionalized 1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine-N-[maleimide(polyethylene glycol)-2000] (PEG2000-DSPE). Antibodies raised against RH5Nt peptide (Anti-pRH5Nt) blocked RH5 binding to P113 (c), but not to basigin (d). The indicated concentrations of protein-G purified rabbit polyclonal antibodies were incubated with RH5 β-lactamase-tagged prey proteins before presenting them to immobilized P113 (c) or basigin (d) baits. Prey binding was quantified by nitrocefin hydrolysis at 485 nm; polyclonal antibodies to RH5FL and AMA1 were used as positive and negative controls respectively. (e) Polyclonal antibodies elicited against the RH5Nt amph-vaccine inhibited erythrocyte invasion of both 3D7 and Dd2 strain of P. falciparum. Data points represent means±95% confidence interval, n=3; a representative experiment from two independent experiments is shown.


RH5 is a strong candidate for inclusion in a malaria vaccine because it is susceptible to vaccine-elicited antibodies and its interaction with the basigin receptor is essential for invasion. The finding that RH5 interacts with both host and parasite proteins has led to a model whereby RH5 functions as a central organizing component of a protein complex formed at the nexus of the merozoite–erythrocyte interface that triggers further rhoptry release and the formation of an ‘open connection’ through which other invasion proteins can be delivered to establish the moving junction4. One missing component of this model is a molecular explanation for how the secreted RH5 protein is localized to the merozoite surface. Here we use a library of recombinant proteins and a sensitive assay designed to detect low-affinity extracellular interactions to identify the GPI-anchored merozoite surface protein P113 as a direct interacting partner of RH5 which could provide such a tethering mechanism. Importantly, we show that the P113 interaction site on RH5 lies within the N terminus of RH5—a region which is absent from the major form of RH5 that is detected in parasite culture supernatants, and therefore provides a regulatory mechanism by which RH5 could be released from the merozoite surface during invasion. Moreover, by using individual components of the RH5 complex, we have determined that not all constituents of the RH5 complex can interact simultaneously, again suggesting that there is an ordered schedule of protein interactions that could delineate separable molecular events during invasion. Adding the contributions described here into a broader context compiled from many other researchers suggests the following model (Fig. 7).

Figure 7: A model describing the role of the RH5 complex and its interaction with P113 during erythrocyte invasion.

Before invasion, the different components of the RH5 invasion complex are segregated within different subcellular locations of the merozoite and therefore purposefully prevented from interacting: RH5 is located in the rhoptries, CyRPA and RIPR in the micronemes, and P113 on the surface of the merozoite. Following engagement of the erythrocyte and release of the rhoptry contents, RH5 is tethered via its N-terminal region at the merozoite membrane by the surface-localized multimeric P113, enabling direct presentation to the basigin receptor on the erythrocyte surface and leading to the formation of an open connection for other invasion ligands to be secreted (1). The AMA1/RON complex initiates the formation of the moving junction (2). The localized secretion of CyRPA and RIPR from the micronemes leads to the formation of the RH5-CyRPA-RIPR-basigin invasion complex which, either because of the cleavage of RH5 to remove the N-terminal region, and/or because P113 and RIPR cannot simultaneously bind the RH5 complex would release RH5 from the P113 tether at the merozoite surface to licence invasion (3). The P113-RH5 complex would therefore only be fleetingly formed during the rapid invasion process resulting in a soluble post-invasion RH5Ct-CyRPA-RIPR complex.

Proteomics studies of P. falciparum blood-stage membrane preparations have shown that P113 is GPI-anchored and one of the most abundant proteins constitutively present on the merozoite surface26,27,38, which we show here is likely to be clustered on the surface as tetramers. There are few studies on P. falciparum P113, but antibody responses against P113 have been shown to be associated with protection from malaria in study cohorts from both Africa39 and Papua New Guinea40. Although it is unclear precisely when RH5 is proteolytically cleaved during the rapid invasion process, it is tempting to speculate that at least a proportion of RH5 is released from rhoptries as an unprocessed full length form and confined to the merozoite surface via direct interactions between its N-terminal region and P113 with a relatively high (KD=0.3 μM) binding affinity; the clustering of P113 may be important for increasing local binding avidity for RH5FL. We show here that RH5FL can simultaneously bind P113 and basigin through the N- and C-terminal regions, respectively, so that it is molecularly possible for RH5 to bridge the merozoite and erythrocyte membranes through these interactions. The P113-RH5-basigin complex may then trigger secretion of other parasite ligands including the AMA1/RON complex which lead to the formation of the moving junction4. We have established here that the secreted CyRPA protein can bind RH5 within the P113-RH5-basigin complex, and because we could detect direct interactions between RIPR and CyRPA but not RH5, CyRPA may perform the role of recruiting RIPR to the RH5 complex. These findings provide two possible mechanisms for RH5 complex release from P113 at the merozoite surface: (1) the proteolytic cleavage of the N-terminal region of RH5; and (2) the mutually exclusive binding of RIPR and P113 to the RH5 complex, which suggests that the recruitment of RIPR to the complex would allow its release from the merozoite surface. In summary, we suggest that at the moment of invasion, RH5 is locally concentrated and presented to the basigin receptor at the site of contact between the merozoite and erythrocyte through interactions with surface localized P113. The binding of the CyRPA and RIPR proteins to RH5 may act as a one-way ‘switch’ to licence the next step of the invasion process by releasing the RH5 complex from the surface-tethered P113 due to the mutually exclusive binding of RIPR and P113 in the RH5 complex, and/or recruitment of a protease that cleaves the N-terminal region of RH5. The identification of the protease/s responsible for RH5 cleavage will be an important step in understanding the function of the RH5 invasion complex. Whilst the observation that aprotinin can reduce RH5 processing suggests the involvement of a serine protease, RH5 is not a predicted or experimentally validated substrate of the well-characterized parasite blood-stage serine proteases, the subtilisins including SUB131.

One intriguing evolutionary puzzle is that clearly identifiable orthologues of each component of the RH5 complex do not necessarily co-occur in the genomes of different Plasmodium species: orthologues of both P113 and RIPR are found across Plasmodium species that infect both primates and rodents; CyRPA orthologues are present in primate, but not the rodent parasites; and RH5 is further restricted to a subset of the primate parasites closely related to P. falciparum within the subgenus Laverania. Most likely, the proteins encoded by these genes perform different roles in these species but have been co-opted by P. falciparum together with the evolution of the RH5 protein for their roles in invasion. Functional studies in P. berghei, for example, have shown that P113-deficient parasites could complete their lifecycle, but had lower numbers of parasites making the transition from sporozoites to the liver-stage form41; and, more recently, P113 has been shown to be a peripheral member of the PTEX translocation machinery which is conserved across Plasmodium spp.42.

Finally, we show that a linear peptide corresponding to the N terminus of RH5 retains the functional ability to bind P113 and, importantly, could elicit antibodies that inhibit parasite growth. This is of interest because peptides can be synthesized at scale and are chemically defined—both relevant considerations for the production of a vaccine. Recent and continuing developments in adjuvant-enhancement of peptides to safely elicit high-titre antibody responses such as the use of albumin-binding amphiphilic molecular groups may present new opportunities in the development of cost-effective vaccines. An affordable and highly effective malaria vaccine would undoubtedly be an important control measure to improve the lives of the billions of people who live at risk of this deadly infectious disease.


Protein-based methods

Recombinant P. falciparum proteins were expressed by transient transfection of HEK293 cells from the 3D7 strain using expression plasmids described in refs 24, 25. With the exception of RIPR that was expressed in Freestyle 293-F cells (ThermoFisher Scientific), all proteins were expressed using HEK293-6E cells43. RH5 was processed (Fig. 1a) when expressed in HEK293 media supplemented with fetal calf serum; this processing was reduced by using HEK293 cells adapted to serum-free media and prevented where necessary by the addition of (2 to 10 μg ml−1) aprotinin. Briefly, all plasmids were chemically synthesized using codons optimized for expression in human cells, potential N-linked glycosylation sequons were mutated, and contained a C-terminal rat Cd4d3+4 tag. Where appropriate, monomeric ‘bait’ proteins were enzymatically monobiotinylated by cotransfection with a plasmid encoding a secreted BirA enzyme as described23,44. His-tagged proteins were purified from supernatants on HisTrap HP columns using an ÄKTAexpress or ÄKTApure (GE Healthcare) and resolved by gel filtration on a Superdex 200 Increase 10/300 column (GE Healthcare) as described45. Regions encoding defined domains of RH5 or P113 were amplified by PCR from plasmids encoding the entire ectodomain and cloned into appropriate expression plasmids. Boundaries for each of the recombinant protein fragments are indicated using amino-acid numbers pertaining to the P. falciparum 3D7 sequence without signal peptide. Recombinant proteins were resolved on Bis-Tris 4–12% SDS polyacrylamide gels and stained with colloidal Coomassie blue. Where necessary, proteins were blotted on to Amersham HyBond PVDF membranes by transfer in NuPAGE transfer buffer (ThermoFisher Scientific) for 1 h at 40 V; membranes were blocked in PBS/2% BSA for 3 h, probed with 1:10,000 primary antibodies, washed four times with PBST (PBS/0.1% Tween-20), and then incubated with 1:5,000 of anti-rabbit horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary (ThermoFisher Scientific Cat. No. G21234). After further washing four times in PBST blots were exposed on film using West Pico ECL (ThermoFisher Scientific). Uncropped gels and blots used to produce Figs 1a, 2c and 4e and Supplementary Fig. 4 are provided in Supplementary Fig. 7. Recombinant proteins analysed by SEC were resolved by native PAGE using Bis-Tris polyacrylamide gels at 150 V and colloidal Coomassie staining. Edman N-terminal protein sequencing was performed by the PNAC facility at the University of Cambridge using standard procedures.

Avidity-based extracellular protein interaction screening

AVEXIS was performed essentially as described23. Monomeric biotinylated bait proteins and highly avid pentameric β-lactamase-tagged prey protein activities were prepared and their expression levels normalized as described44 to 5 μg ml−1 before their use in interaction screening. Briefly, biotinylated baits were immobilized in streptavidin-coated 96-well microtitre plates, washed with PBST (PBS/0.1% Tween-20), incubated with prey proteins, washed three times with PBST and any captured preys quantified by adding the colorimetric β-lactamase substrate nitrocefin and measuring the absorbance of the hydrolysis products at 485 nm. The negative control in each screen was the query prey protein probed against the Cd4d3+4 tag alone. Positive control interactions included the human basigin bait detected with the RH5 prey, and the rat Cd200 bait with rat Cd200R prey.


SPR was performed using a Biacore T100 instrument (GE Healthcare) as previously described45. Briefly, 150 RU of biotinylated rat Cd4d3+4 was captured on a streptavidin-coated sensor chip (GE Healthcare) to be used as a reference, and an equivalent molar quantity of query protein was captured in the query flow cell. Immediately before SPR experiments, analyte proteins were separated by size exclusion chromatography to remove aggregates, which even in very small amounts can affect kinetic measurements46. Although monomeric RH5Nt resolved as a monodisperse peak by gel filtration at the expected size, the initial binding kinetics of the RH5Nt-P113 interaction were initially rapid followed by much slower binding kinetics, and this behaviour was mirrored in the dissociation phase once the injection of RH5Nt was complete, suggesting the presence of small amounts of active multimeric material; attempts were made to reduce this affect by performing SPR immediately after size separation. Kinetic studies were performed at high flow rates (100 μl min−1) to reduce confounding rebinding effects and equilibrium binding analysis at 10 μl min−1. Where necessary, surfaces were regenerated by injecting a pulse of 2 M NaCl. The retention of immobilized ligand surface activity was confirmed by showing equivalent binding responses of the same concentration before and after chip regeneration. Binding data were analysed in the Biacore T100 evaluation software (GE Healthcare) using reference-subtracted sensorgrams. Independent protein preparations of both analyte and ligand proteins were used for replicate experiments, all of which were performed at 37 °C.

RH5Nt amph-vaccine and antibodies

A 117 amino-acid peptide corresponding to RH5Nt (F1-K116) with an additional C-terminal cysteine was chemically synthesized (LifeTein). The peptide was dissolved in DMF and conjugated to maleimide-PEG2000-DSPE (Avanti Polar Lipids) at a 1:2 molar ratio overnight at room temperature with rotation. Polyclonal antisera were raised by immunizing rabbits six times with 100 μg of purified antigen in Freund’s adjuvant in rabbits (Cambridge Research Biochemicals) in strict accordance with UK Home Office governmental regulations and the local Sanger Institute animal welfare ethical review board. Polyclonal antisera were similarly raised against full-length CyRPA and the P113 Y1-N653 fragment expressed in mammalian cells as rat Cd4d3+4-6His tagged proteins and purified using Ni2+-NTA chromatography. The sera were purified according to manufacturer’s instructions on an ÄKTA system using separate Hi-Trap Protein G HP columns (GE Healthcare) for each rabbit serum. The fractions were eluted with 0.2 M glycine (pH 2.7) directly into a neutralization buffer (1 M Tris:Cl pH 9.0) and immediately dialysed into PBS.

P. falciparum culture and invasion assays

The 3D7 and Dd2 P. falciparum strains were obtained from BEI Resources and cultured in human O+ erythrocytes at 5% haematocrit in complete medium (RPMI-1640 containing 10% Albumax under an atmosphere of 1% O2, 3% CO2 and 96% N2. Blood was purchased from UK NHS Blood and Transplant (NHSBT) services. Consent from healthy volunteers was obtained by NHSBT using a study protocol approved by the National Research Ethics Service Committee East of England—Cambridge South and by the Sanger Institute Human Materials and Data Management Committee; samples were provided fully anonymized. Invasion assays were carried out in round-bottom 96 well plates, with a culture volume of 100 μl per well at a haematocrit of 2%. Parasites were synchronized at early stages with 5% (w/v) D-sorbitol; trophozoite stage parasites were mixed with blocking agent and then incubated in the plates for 24 h at 37 °C inside a static incubator culture chamber. At the end of the incubation period erythrocytes were collected and parasitized erythrocytes were stained with 2 μM Hoechst 33342. Purified antibodies were dialysed into RPMI (GIBCO) before use. Hoechst 33342 stained samples were excited with a 355 nm UV laser (20 mW) on a BD LSRH flow cytometer (BD Biosciences) and detected with a 450/50 filter. BD FACS Diva was used to collect 100,000 events for each sample. FSC and SSC voltages of 423 and 198, respectively, and a threshold of 2,000 on FSC were applied to gate the erythrocyte population. The data collected were further analysed with FlowJo (Tree Star). All experiments were carried out in triplicate.

Immunofluorescence of P. falciparum

Air-dried thin films of late-stage schizonts and free merozoites were fixed in ice-cold methanol. Fixed parasites were permeabilized in PBS/Triton X100 1% (except in Supplementary Fig. 1b) and blocked in PBS/3%BSA/10%goat serum. Parasites were stained with the primary antibodies: 1:10,000 rabbit anti-P113 polyclonal (this study), 1:400 mouse anti-MSP9 polyclonal (a gift of Alexander Douglas11), 1:5,000 mouse anti-MSP1 monoclonal (a gift of Michael Blackman), 1:1,000 rat anti-MTIP47 overnight at 4 °C. After three washes, the parasites were incubated with secondary antibodies (goat anti-rabbit IgG (H+L) AlexaFluor 488, anti-mouse IgG (H+L) AlexaFluor 555, goat anti-rat IgG (H+L) AlexaFluor 555, all ThermoFisher Scientific Cat. No.s A-11008, A-21424 and A-21434, respectively) diluted 1:500 for 1 h at room temperature. The samples were washed in PBS three times and mounted in Prolong Gold (Molecular Probes) with DAPI before images were captured on a Leica DMi8 fluorescent microscope and processed using Leica LAS X software and Photoshop.

P113 purification from parasite cultures

P. falciparum parasites were tightly synchronized by alternating treatment between 5% D-sorbitol and isolation on a Percoll gradient. Erythrocytes containing mature schizonts from 50 ml cultures (2.5% haematocrit and 2 to 7% parasitaemia) were isolated on a Percoll gradient and lysed with 0.15% saponin. The parasite pellet was washed with PBS and resuspended in lysis buffer (25 mM Tris-Cl, pH 7.4, 1 mM EDTA, 1% NP40, 150 mM NaCl, 5% glycerol, 5 mM AEBSF, 4 mM aprotinin, 0.2 mM bestatin, 75 μM E64, 0.1 mM Leupeptin, 50 μM Pepstatin A). The release of P113 into the aqueous phase was improved by either the addition of 1% Triton X-100 or vortexing and rotation at room temperature for 1 to 4 h. The lysate supernatant was incubated with streptavidin-conjugated agarose beads for 1 h at room temperature to remove non-specific binders. Streptavidin agarose beads (Pierce) were loaded with monomeric biotinylated RH5Ct or RH5Nt (as per manufacturer’s instructions) and added to the lysate supernatant (109 parasites per 100 μg of RH5Ct or RH5Nt protein). After incubating for 4 h at room temperature the agarose beads were washed three times (PBS, 0.1% Tween 20) and the bound proteins eluted in 2% LDS. The eluate was analysed by SDS–PAGE under reducing conditions and probed with P113 polyclonal antibodies.

Cell surface expression of P113

Plasmids containing the CyRPA and P113 coding sequences were chemically synthesized as described above for the merozoite cell surface library but with three differences: constructs included their endogenous signal peptides, the GPI-sequence of P113 was retained, and the proteins lacked any protein tags; these plasmids were transiently transfected in HEK293 cells. After 24 and 48 h the culture supernatant and cells were collected, probed with the appropriate polyclonal IgG raised against CyRPA or P113 and stained with anti-rabbit IgG (H+L) conjugated to Alexa Fluor 568 (ThermoFisher Scientific Cat. No. A10042). PBS was used to wash the cells between antibody incubations. Flow cytometry was performed on a BD LSR Fortessa.

Data availability

All relevant data are available from the authors upon request.

Additional information

How to cite this article: Galaway, F et al. P113 is a merozoite surface protein that binds the N terminus of Plasmodium falciparum RH5. Nat. Commun. 8, 14333 doi: 10.1038/ncomms14333 (2017).

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.


  1. 1

    Murray, C. J. et al. Global malaria mortality between 1980 and 2010: a systematic analysis. Lancet 379, 413–431 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Cowman, A. F. & Crabb, B. S. Invasion of red blood cells by malaria parasites. Cell 124, 755–766 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Cowman, A. F., Berry, D. & Baum, J. The cellular and molecular basis for malaria parasite invasion of the human red blood cell. J. Cell Biol. 198, 961–971 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Weiss, G. E. et al. Revealing the sequence and resulting cellular morphology of receptor-ligand interactions during Plasmodium falciparum invasion of erythrocytes. PLoS Pathog. 11, e1004670 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Hadley, T. J. Invasion of erythrocytes by malaria parasites: a cellular and molecular overview. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 40, 451–477 (1986).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Gilson, P. R. & Crabb, B. S. Morphology and kinetics of the three distinct phases of red blood cell invasion by Plasmodium falciparum merozoites. Int. J. Parasitol. 39, 91–96 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Ord, R. L., Rodriguez, M. & Lobo, C. A. Malaria invasion ligand RH5 and its prime candidacy in blood-stage malaria vaccine design. Hum. Vaccines Immunother. 11, 1465–1473 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Baum, J. et al. Reticulocyte-binding protein homologue 5—an essential adhesin involved in invasion of human erythrocytes by Plasmodium falciparum. Int. J. Parasitol. 39, 371–380 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Crosnier, C. et al. Basigin is a receptor essential for erythrocyte invasion by Plasmodium falciparum. Nature 480, 534–537 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Manske, M. et al. Analysis of Plasmodium falciparum diversity in natural infections by deep sequencing. Nature 487, 375–379 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Douglas, A. D. et al. The blood-stage malaria antigen PfRH5 is susceptible to vaccine-inducible cross-strain neutralizing antibody. Nat. Commun. 2, 601 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Ord, R. L. et al. Targeting sialic acid dependent and independent pathways of invasion in Plasmodium falciparum. PLoS ONE 7, e30251 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Bustamante, L. Y. et al. A full-length recombinant Plasmodium falciparum PfRH5 protein induces inhibitory antibodies that are effective across common PfRH5 genetic variants. Vaccine 31, 373–379 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Reddy, K. S. et al. Bacterially expressed full-length recombinant Plasmodium falciparum RH5 protein binds erythrocytes and elicits potent strain-transcending parasite-neutralizing antibodies. Infect. Immun. 82, 152–164 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Douglas, A. D. et al. A PfRH5-based vaccine is efficacious against heterologous strain blood-stage Plasmodium falciparum infection in Aotus monkeys. Cell Host Microbe 17, 130–139 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Chen, L. et al. An EGF-like protein forms a complex with PfRh5 and is required for invasion of human erythrocytes by Plasmodium falciparum. PLoS Pathog. 7, e1002199 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Douglas, A. D. et al. Neutralization of Plasmodium falciparum merozoites by antibodies against PfRH5. J. Immunol. 192, 245–258 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Ord, R. L. et al. A malaria vaccine candidate based on an epitope of the Plasmodium falciparum RH5 protein. Malar. J. 13, 326 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Wright, K. E. et al. Structure of malaria invasion protein RH5 with erythrocyte basigin and blocking antibodies. Nature 515, 427–430 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Chen, L. et al. Crystal structure of PfRh5, an essential P. falciparum ligand for invasion of human erythrocytes. Elife 3, e04187 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Reddy, K. S. et al. Multiprotein complex between the GPI-anchored CyRPA with PfRH5 and PfRipr is crucial for Plasmodium falciparum erythrocyte invasion. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 1179–1184 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Dreyer, A. M. et al. Passive immunoprotection of Plasmodium falciparum-infected mice designates the CyRPA as candidate malaria vaccine antigen. J. Immunol. 188, 6225–6237 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Bushell, K. M., Sollner, C., Schuster-Boeckler, B., Bateman, A. & Wright, G. J. Large-scale screening for novel low-affinity extracellular protein interactions. Genome Res. 18, 622–630 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Crosnier, C. et al. A library of functional recombinant cell-surface and secreted P. falciparum merozoite proteins. Mol. Cell Proteomics 12, 3976–3986 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Zenonos, Z. A., Rayner, J. C. & Wright, G. J. Towards a comprehensive Plasmodium falciparum merozoite cell surface and secreted recombinant protein library. Malar. J. 13, 93 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Sanders, P. R. et al. Distinct protein classes including novel merozoite surface antigens in Raft-like membranes of Plasmodium falciparum. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 40169–40176 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Sanders, P. R. et al. Identification of protein complexes in detergent-resistant membranes of Plasmodium falciparum schizonts. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 154, 148–157 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Florens, L. et al. A proteomic view of the Plasmodium falciparum life cycle. Nature 419, 520–526 (2002).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Silvestrini, F. et al. Protein export marks the early phase of gametocytogenesis of the human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum. Mol. Cell Proteomics 9, 1437–1448 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30

    Imboumy-Limoukou, R. K. et al. Immunoglobulin response to the low polymorphic Pf113 antigen in children from Lastoursville, South-East of Gabon. Acta Tropica 163, 149–156 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31

    Silmon de Monerri, N. C. et al. Global identification of multiple substrates for Plasmodium falciparum SUB1, an essential malarial processing protease. Infect. Immun. 79, 1086–1097 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32

    Wright, G. J. Signal initiation in biological systems: the properties and detection of transient extracellular protein interactions. Mol. Biosyst. 5, 1405–1412 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33

    Lupas, A., Van Dyke, M. & Stock, J. Predicting coiled coils from protein sequences. Science 252, 1162–1164 (1991).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34

    Gondeau, C. et al. The C-terminal domain of Plasmodium falciparum merozoite surface protein 3 self-assembles into alpha-helical coiled coil tetramer. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 165, 153–161 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35

    Elliott, J. F. et al. Genes for Plasmodium falciparum surface antigens cloned by expression in COS cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 87, 6363–6367 (1990).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36

    Volz, J. C. et al. Essential role of the PfRh5/PfRipr/CyRPA complex during Plasmodium falciparum invasion of erythrocytes. Cell Host Microbe 20, 1 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37

    Liu, H. et al. Structure-based programming of lymph-node targeting in molecular vaccines. Nature 507, 519–522 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38

    Gilson, P. R. et al. Identification and stoichiometry of glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored membrane proteins of the human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum. Mol. Cell Proteomics 5, 1286–1299 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39

    Osier, F. H. et al. New antigens for a multicomponent blood-stage malaria vaccine. Sci. Transl. Med. 6, 247ra102 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40

    Richards, J. S. et al. Identification and prioritization of merozoite antigens as targets of protective human immunity to Plasmodium falciparum malaria for vaccine and biomarker development. J. Immunol. 191, 795–809 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41

    Offeddu, V., Rauch, M., Silvie, O. & Matuschewski, K. The Plasmodium protein P113 supports efficient sporozoite to liver stage conversion in vivo. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 193, 101–109 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42

    Elsworth, B. et al. Proteomic analysis reveals novel proteins associated with the Plasmodium protein exporter PTEX and a loss of complex stability upon truncation of the core PTEX component, PTEX150. Cell Microbiol. 18, 1551–1569 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43

    Loignon, M. et al. Stable high volumetric production of glycosylated human recombinant IFNalpha2b in HEK293 cells. BMC Biotechnol. 8, 65 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44

    Kerr, J. S. & Wright, G. J. Avidity-based extracellular interaction screening (AVEXIS) for the scalable detection of low-affinity extracellular receptor-ligand interactions. J. Vis. Exp. 5, e3881 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  45. 45

    Bartholdson, S. J. et al. Semaphorin-7A is an erythrocyte receptor for P. falciparum merozoite-specific TRAP homolog, MTRAP. PLoS Pathog. 8, e1003031 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46

    van der Merwe, P. A. & Barclay, A. N. Analysis of cell-adhesion molecule interactions using surface plasmon resonance. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 8, 257–261 (1996).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47

    Jones, M. L., Kitson, E. L. & Rayner, J. C. Plasmodium falciparum erythrocyte invasion: a conserved myosin associated complex. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 147, 74–84 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


This work was supported by the Wellcome Trust grant number 098051 and Medical Research Council (G1000413), a Sanger Institute translational award to F.G. and G.J.W. We would like to thank Cecile Crosnier (Sanger Institute, UK) for the initial Edman sequencing of cleavage sites, Paula Cawkill and Sarah J. E. Marsden (Sanger Institute, UK) for assisting with parasite culture and invasion assays, and Alexander Douglas (Sanger Institute, UK) and Michael Blackman (Crick Institute, UK) for providing the MSP9 and MSP1 antibodies. The following reagent was obtained through BEI Resources, NIAID, NIH: Plasmodium falciparum, Strains 3D7, MRA-102, contributed by Daniel J. Carucci and Dd2, MRA-150, contributed by David Walliker.

Author information




F.G. performed all the experiments except identification of the RH5-P113 interaction sites which was performed by M.F. under the guidance of F.G., and parasite immunofluorescence which was performed by L.G.D. Parasite invasion assays and culture were performed by N.C. and A.C.K. under the guidance of J.C.R. The study was conceived and the manuscript written by F.G. and G.J.W.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gavin J. Wright.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figures and Supplementary Table. (PDF 921 kb)

Peer Review File (PDF 1560 kb)

Rights and permissions

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Galaway, F., Drought, L., Fala, M. et al. P113 is a merozoite surface protein that binds the N terminus of Plasmodium falciparum RH5. Nat Commun 8, 14333 (2017).

Download citation


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing