Major sulfonate transporter Soa1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and considerable substrate diversity in its fungal family

Article metrics


Sulfate is a well-established sulfur source for fungi; however, in soils sulfonates and sulfate esters, especially choline sulfate, are often much more prominent. Here we show that Saccharomyces cerevisiae YIL166C(SOA1) encodes an inorganic sulfur (sulfate, sulfite and thiosulfate) transporter that also catalyses sulfonate and choline sulfate uptake. Phylogenetic analysis of fungal SOA1 orthologues and expression of 20 members in the sul1Δ sul2Δ soa1Δ strain, which is deficient in inorganic and organic sulfur compound uptake, reveals that these transporters have diverse substrate preferences for sulfur compounds. We further show that SOA2, a S. cerevisiae SOA1 paralogue found in S. uvarum, S. eubayanus and S. arboricola is likely to be an evolutionary remnant of the uncharacterized open reading frames YOL163W and YOL162W. Our work highlights the importance of sulfonates and choline sulfate as sulfur sources in the natural environment of S. cerevisiae and other fungi by identifying fungal transporters for these compounds.


Soil is a common environmental habitat for fungi, in which organic sulfonates and sulfate esters account for the majority of sulfur sources available for microbial growth1. Inorganic sulfate, for example, in the form of SO42−, accounts for only a few per cent of the sulfur available in the soil. In spite of their significance as a natural source of sulfur, sulfonates and sulfate esters have received relatively little attention, especially compared with sulfate. Sulfonates have a sulfonic acid group covalently attached to carbon and can originate from plants, animals and microbial conversion of inorganic sulfate2,3,4. The β-amino sulfonic acid taurine is widely distributed in nature and even makes up 0.1% of the human body weight5. Contrary to animals that rely on inorganic sulfur and sulfur-containing amino acids as the source of sulfur, microorganisms can convert sulfonates to sulfite, an intermediate in the sulfate utilization pathway6,7. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae α-ketoglutarate dioxygenase Jlp1 can degrade the aliphatic sulfonates, isethionate and taurine, and is the only known fungal gene involved in sulfonate metabolism8. Its occurrence in hemiascomycete yeasts correlates with their ability to assimilate aliphatic sulfonates9. Sulfate esters are commonly found in soils with, for instance, animal excreta and decaying animal matter as a major origin. Choline sulfate is a major non-acid storage form of sulfate in soils and is highly resistant to nonenzymatic hydrolysis. It is returned to soils from a variety of sources, including plants, fungi and lichens, as well as bacteria, which often secrete it into the medium. It is considered an important natural source of sulfur, as even fungi able to synthesize choline sulfate are also able to take it up from the environment1.

Up to now, no conclusive experimental evidence has been reported for any fungal sulfonate transporter. In Basidiomycota and Eurotiomycete filamentous fungi, orthologues of the S. cerevisiae JLP1 gene were found to be genomically co-localized with a predicted transporter gene, suggested to encode a sulfonate (taurine) transporter10. In the S. cerevisiae genome, JLP1 and YIL166C, an orthologue of this candidate sulfonate transporter gene, are located on different chromosomes. In spite of this, our work has identified the YIL166C gene product as an experimentally confirmed sulfonate transporter in fungi and we renamed the gene, SOA1 (for sulfonate transport). The closest known orthologue of SOA1 is the Aspergillus nidulans alternative sulfate transporter (encoded by astA), isolated in a screen for restoration of growth with sulfate in a mutant strain defective in sulfate transport11,12. Its designation as an alternative sulfate transporter refers to the fact that the AstA transporter does not belong to the well-known SulP family of sulfate permeases, to which also the S. cerevisiae Sul1 and Sul2 sulfate transporters belong. Instead, the astA and YIL166C/SOA1 encoded transporters belong to the extensive Dal5 allantoate permease family of fungal major facilitator superfamily (MFS) transporters responsible for uptake of various organic anions and vitamins12. In prokaryotes, several experimentally confirmed sulfonate carriers belonging to the ABC class of transporters have been reported6. Bacterial transporters are mainly encoded by genes located together with functionally related genes in operons6 and, based only on this co-localization, putative sulfonate MFS transporters have been suggested for isethionate and sulfoacetate in the soil bacterium Cupriavidus necator13,14.

In S. Cerevisiae, inorganic sulfur uptake mainly occurs by the high-affinity sulfate H+-symporters, Sul1 and Sul2, which belong to the SulP family and of which the expression is strongly enhanced under sulfur starvation conditions15,16,17,18. They also transport other sulfate esters and sulfite as well19,20. A sul1Δ sul2Δ strain is unable to grow on media with low levels of sulfate as the sole sulfur source, but it can grow in the presence of high levels of sulfate and with sulfite. The responsible carrier(s), however, for growth of this strain with high levels of sulfate and with sulfite have remained elusive. We have recently shown that both Sul1 and Sul2 act as transporter receptors or transceptors for sulfate-induced activation of the protein kinase A (PKA) pathway in sulfur-starved S. cerevisiae cells20, which prompted us to identify the remaining unknown inorganic sulfur carrier(s).

Here we show that the YIL166C gene product is the remaining inorganic sulfur transporter that is responsible for the uptake of sulfite and high levels of sulfate during growth of the sul1Δ sul2Δ strain with these compounds as the sole sulfur source. Further analysis, however, surprisingly reveals that YIL166C encodes the major sulfonate permease in S. cerevisiae and transports a wide variety of naturally occurring sulfonates at physiological concentrations. Hence, we name YIL166C as SOA1 (for sulfonate transport). Phylogenetic analysis reveals that SOA1 belongs to an extensive family of poorly characterized fungal transporters of organic anions, of which some members were suggested to function as sulfonate transporters. We have expressed multiple SOA1 orthologues from five representative fungal species in S. cerevisiae, which confirms their function in transport of various sulfonates with a diverse specificity. Finally, we show that the S. cerevisiae genes, YOL163W and YOL162W, are likely to be evolutionary leftovers from a second sulfonate transporter gene, which we named SOA2, and which is present in an intact form only in the most distantly related Saccharomyces species, whereas it is completely absent in more closely related Saccharomyces species.


YIL166C encodes a sulfur compound transporter

Deletion of both the SUL1 and SUL2 genes, encoding the high-affinity sulfate transporters in S. cerevisiae, abolishes growth on low levels of sulfate but still permits growth at high concentrations of sulfate (refs 16, 20; Fig. 1a). To identify the remaining low-affinity sulfate transporter(s), we have deleted several candidate genes in the sul1Δ sul2Δ strain. They included the paralogues YGR125W and YPR003C, which display only weak sequence similarity to SUL1 and SUL2, and are divergent from the major groups of sulfate transporters17 and the uncharacterized MFS transporter gene YIL166C (later named SOA1), a gene that is highly upregulated during sulfur starvation18. The triple deletion mutants sul1Δ sul2Δ ygr125wΔ and sul1Δ sul2Δ ypr003cΔ displayed similar growth behaviour as the sul1Δ sul2Δ strain with high sulfate (40 mM), sulfite (0.2 mM) or thiosulfate (0.2 mM) as the sole source of sulfur (Fig. 1a). Growth of the sul1Δ sul2Δ strain with sulfite as the sole source of sulfur has previously been reported21. On the other hand, the sul1Δ sul2Δ yil166c(soa1)Δ strain lacked significant growth with any of these sources of sulfur, whereas it showed, similar to the other strains, normal growth with methionine (Fig. 1a).

Figure 1: Identification of SOA1 as a sulfur compound transporter gene.

(a) SOA1, YGR125W and YCR003C were deleted in a sul1Δ sul2Δ strain to create triple deletion strains that were assayed for growth on Sulfur B plates at pH 6.5 with sulfate (40 mM), sulfite (0.2 mM) or thiosulfate (0.2 mM). Growth of the wild-type strain was assayed on different plates because of interference with the growth of the deletion strains by an unidentified sulfur compound (possibly H2S) excreted by the wild-type strain. (bd) The effect of SUL1, SUL2 and/or SOA1 deletion on growth was assayed in liquid cultures with varying concentrations of (b) sulfite (1–200 μM), (c) thiosulfate (1–200 μM) and (d) sulfate (0.2–40 mM). (eg) Maximal growth rates (OD600 h−1) were determined from the growth curves and fitted to saturation kinetics (Monod equation) for (e) sulfite, (f) thiosulfate and (g) sulfate. For determination of the half-velocity constants (Ks) of sulfite and thiosulfate, maximal growth rates were derived from individual replicates of which the mean is shown with error bars indicating s.d. These experiments were carried out in triplicate from aliquots of the same cell preparation assayed independently. As the experiments with sulfate were carried out in duplicate, error bars are only indicated for sulfite and thiosulfite, which in many cases are so small that they are not visible.

In growth experiments with liquid medium containing sulfite or thiosulfate as the sole source of sulfur, both the sul1Δ sul2Δ and soa1Δ strains were able to grow slowly at concentrations between 1.0 and 7.5 μM, indicating that the two systems were able to take up very low concentrations of these inorganic sulfur compounds (Fig. 1b,c). The growth rate with these compounds was limited by their concentration below 200 μM and showed saturation kinetics, with a Ks (half-velocity constant) of 67.4±8.3 and 68.3±10.3 μM (s.e.m., n=3) for growth with sulfite of the sul1Δ sul2Δ and the soa1Δ strain, respectively, and a Ks of 75.8±6.0 and 11.2±0.9 μM (s.e.m., n=3) for growth with thiosulfate of the sul1Δ sul2Δ and the soa1Δ strain, respectively (Fig. 1e,f). In case of the soa1Δ strain, the Ks value is the result of the transporter kinetics of both Sul1 and Sul2. Our results are consistent with both Soa1 and Sul1/Sul2 being high-affinity sulfite and thiosulfate transporters. In growth experiments with different concentrations of sulfate, from 0.2 to 40 mM, the sul1Δ sul2Δ soa1Δ strain was unable to grow at whatever concentration, whereas the soa1Δ strain was able to grow equally well at all concentrations and the sul1Δ sul2Δ strain grew only from a concentration of 5 mM on and not at all at 2 mM or below (Fig. 1d,g). These results indicate that YIL166C(SOA1) encodes the only the remaining low-affinity sulfate transporter and also the only remaining high-affinity sulfite and thiosulfate transporter in S. cerevisiae.

We have characterized growth with sulfite in more detail. Sulfite is present in different forms depending on the pH: SO2, HSO3 or SO32−. At pH 3–5, there is a high level of SO2, which diffuses through the plasma membrane and is converted into HSO3 and SO32− at the higher intracellular pH21,22. Sulfite can be exported by the Ssu1 efflux pump23,24,25. As expected, deletion of SUL1, SUL2 and YIL166C(SOA1) did not prevent growth at pH 3.5–4.5, whereas it was strongly reduced at pH 5.5 and absent at pH 6.5 and 7.0 (Fig. 2a). Interestingly, deletion of SUL1 and SUL2 had less effect on growth at all pH values compared with deletion of YIL166C(SOA1) (Fig. 2a), indicating that YIL166C(SOA1) encodes the most active sulfite transporter in S. cerevisiae.

Figure 2: pH dependence and substrate diversity.

(a) pH dependence of growth with sulfite in malic acid–phosphate-buffered sulfur B medium with the pH adjusted between 3.5 and 7.0. (b) Dependence on SOA1 and/or SUL1 and SUL2 for growth with various sulfonates or choline sulfate as sole sulfur source.

YIL166C encodes a sulfonate transporter

Given the ability of yeasts to grow on organic sulfur sources and their frequent isolation from soil, we also tested a possible role of YIL166C(SOA1) in the uptake of organic sulfur compounds. For that purpose, we tested the yil166c(soa1)Δ strain for growth with C2–C7 aliphatic sulfonates and with the substituted sulfonates isethionate, taurine, L-cysteic acid, sulfoacetic acid and hydroxymethane sulfonate as the sole source of sulfur. Deletion of YIL166C(SOA1) abolished growth with all these compounds, except for hydroxymethane sulfonate for which there was only a partial reduction in growth (Fig. 2b). The remaining growth with the latter compound was due to the Sul1 and Sul2 transporters, as it was abolished by additional deletion of SUL1 and SUL2 (Fig. 2b). We also tested growth with the sulfate ester choline sulfate and, in this case, growth was only abolished in the sul1Δ sul2Δ yil166c(soa1)Δ strain, indicating that this compound can be taken up by Sul1, Sul2 and Yil166c(Soa1) (Fig. 2b). As the YIL166C encoded transporter seems to play a major role in sulfonate uptake, we called it SOA1 (for sulfonate transport).

We have also measured the transport kinetics of Soa1 using short-term uptake of radioactively labelled isethionate and taurine in cells that had been starved for sulfur for 3 days, to establish high expression of SOA1. Soa1 showed Michaelis–Menten kinetics for uptake of isethionate with medium affinity (Km=116.9±13.2 μM; s.e.m., n=3). We have added a Hanes–Woolf plot as inset in Fig. 3a. In the absence of Soa1, isethionate uptake was negligible (Fig. 3a). When isethionate uptake was measured as a function of pH, there was a steep increase at pH values below 6, which was also observed in the soa1Δ strain, suggesting that it may be due to diffusion, similar to the uptake of sulfite at low pH. The pH profile of isethionate uptake was virtually identical in the soa1Δ and sul1Δ sul2Δ soa1Δ strains (Fig. 3a), indicating that neither Sul1 nor Sul2 play any significant role in isethionate uptake at whatever pH of the medium. Isethionate uptake by Soa1 drops from pH 6 to pH 5, which probably reflects a regular pH effect on protein structure/activity, similar to the pH profile of sulfate uptake, which does not suffer from interference with diffusion (see further, Fig. 3d).

Figure 3: Transport kinetics of Soa1 and ASTA.

Cells were starved for sulfur, buffered in Bis-Tris pH 6.5 and transport rates were measured by short-term exposure to different concentrations of radiolabelled isethionate (a), taurine (b) and sulfate (c,d). For low-affinity sulfate transport, the concentration was kept constant at 40 mM and transport was measured for 1 and 10 min (c). The affinity constants calculated using the reciprocal approximation of the Hanes–Woolf plots shown as insets (Km of Soa1: 103.8 μM and Km of astA: 8.5 μM) are slightly different from the more precise nonlinear fit to the Michalis–Menten equation already reported (Km of Soa1: 116.9 μM and Km of astA: 7.5 μM). The pH profiles were assayed in different buffers with adjusted pH, while keeping the amount of isethionate (500 μM) and sulfate (200 μM) constant (A,D). H+-symport activity was tested by exposing cells to the proton gradient decoupling agent CCCP for 10 min before transport measurements (a,d). All experiments were carried out in triplicate from aliquots of the same cell preparation assayed independently with the mean shown and error bars indicating s.d. In many cases, the error is so small that the error bars are not visible.

For taurine uptake, no sign of saturation was observed up to the maximally tested concentration of 3.6 mM (Fig. 3b). For concentrations below 1.5 mM, taurine uptake was largely dependent on Soa1; at higher concentrations, there was significant residual uptake in the soa1Δ strain (Fig. 3b). Taurine is unlikely to diffuse through cell membranes because of its zwitterionic nature5 and the carrier(s) responsible for the residual taurine uptake remains unknown. Determination of the uptake of a high level of sulfate (40 mM) in the sul1Δ sul2Δ and sul1Δ sul2Δ soa1Δ strains indicated that the three carriers are responsible for all the uptake of high sulfate, whereas Sul1 and Sul2 are the major high-capacity carriers for high levels of sulfate, as their deletion strongly curtails the uptake of 40 mM sulfate (Fig. 3c).

Soa1 and Aspergillus AstA are proton symporters

The closest orthologue of Soa1 that has been experimentally characterized to some extent is the A. nidulans alternative sulfate MFS transporter encoded by the astA gene12. We have expressed the astA gene from the A. nidulans IAM 2006 strain in S. cerevisiae, replacing the SOA1 gene in the original locus of the sul1Δ sul2Δ soa1Δ strain. This was performed by clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR) targeting of the nourseothricin marker (see Methods) and using a codon-optimized synthetic gene as donor DNA. Using the same method, the S. cerevisiae SOA1 gene was re-inserted in the sul1Δ sul2Δ soa1Δ strain at the original locus, to serve as a control strain. Although the astA gene from A. nidulans was codon optimized and inserted in the original SOA1 locus, we cannot exclude that the protein lacks structural modifications happening in the original host or undergoes new modifications in S. Cerevisiae, which may alter its kinetics.

We performed sulfate uptake experiments with the astA-expressing S. cerevisiae strain and the SOA1 re-insertion strain (Fig. 3d). This showed that AstA is a high-affinity sulfate transporter (Km=7.50±0.53 μM; s.e.m., n=3), and that in this low concentration range (up to 200 μM sulfate) Soa1 shows negligible sulfate transport (at whatever pH tested). We have added a Hanes–Woolf plot as inset in Fig. 3d. There is very little information on kinetic characteristics of sulfur compound transporters in fungi. An early paper by Tweedie and Segel26 reports a Km value of 75 μM for sulfate uptake in sulfur-limited Aspergillus cells; however, it is unclear what transporters were responsible for this uptake. A recent paper by Pilsyk et al.27 has determined the kinetics of long-term sulfate assimilation into cellular organic matter and it is unclear how the kinetic constants determined relate to those of sulfate transport as measured in very short-term uptake experiments.

At a sulfate concentration of 200 μM, AstA displayed a higher pH optimum (pH 7) compared with that of Sul1 and Sul2 (pH 5) (Fig. 3d). High-affinity sulfate transport by AstA displayed a Vmax of 1.01±0.02 nmol min−1 per mg cell dry weight (s.e.m., n=3), which was 12.3 times more efficient than sulfonate transport by Soa1, which had a Vmax of 81.8±3.6 pmol min−1 per mg cell dry weight (s.e.m., n=3). This comparison assumes similar expression levels at the plasma membrane. This cannot be guaranteed in spite of the fact that the astA protein sequence was codon optimized for expression in S. cerevisiae and engineered into the soa1 locus, ensuring the use of the same promoter and terminator, and at the same chromosomal position. Treatment with carbonyl cyanide 3-chlorophenylhydrazone (CCCP), a compound that abolishes the proton gradient over the plasma membrane, virtually eliminated isethionate uptake by Soa1 and sulfate uptake by AstA, with Soa1 being somewhat less sensitive than AstA (Fig. 3d). This is consistent with the transporters functioning as H+-symporters.

Bayesian phylogeny of fungal orthologues

With the new S. cerevisiae sulfonate transporter Soa1 and the A. nidulans high-affinity alternative sulfate transporter AstA, we have made a phylogenetic tree using all related putative transporters of sulfur compounds in fungi (Fig. 4a, Supplementary Figs 1 and 2, and Supplementary Data 1). Based on the apparent evolutionary gaps and the taxonomic classes, the orthologues could be classified into five distinct groups (Fig. 4a). Group 1, which contains all astA-related genes, is clearly distinct from all the other SOA1-related groups; Group 2 contains the closest orthologues to S. cerevisiae SOA1 in the other Saccharomyces sensu stricto species and in other fungi; Group 3 mainly contains orthologues of Soa2, which is encoded by a paralogous gene of SOA1 in Saccharomyces uvarum and Saccharomyces Eubayanus, and of which the gene products show 40% and 41% identity with the gene product of S. cerevisiae SOA1, respectively. SOA2 is also present as an intact gene in the majority of the Saccharomycetes yeasts, with many Candida species having multiple paralogues; Group 4 contains orthologues from most Aspergillus species and in particular orthologues from other Eurotiomycete species and from Dothideomycete species; Group 5 is the largest group and is especially rich in Basidiomycota and Sordariomycete orthologues; Group 6 is a very small group that is most distantly related to the other groups, suggesting that it branched off the earliest in evolution. Groups 4 and 5 have been collapsed in Fig. 4a for simplicity and are shown in full in Supplementary Figs 1 and 2. The SOA1 orthologues were remarkably conserved over all the fungal taxonomic groups (Fig. 4a and Supplementary Figs 1 and 2), ranging from the Chytridiomycota that originated in the Precambrian time 630 million years ago as the earliest fungi to the more recent groups of Basidiomycota and Ascomycota that diverged 500 million years ago28,29.

Figure 4: Phylogenetic relationship and substrate preference of Soa1 fungal orthologues.

(a) Phylogenetic tree of alternative sulfate and sulfonate transporter orthologues, which were found with a BLASTP search against all non-redundant peptides and TBLASTN search against the Saccharomyces species not represented in the non-redundant peptide database. A protein tree was made with the program BEAST, using 70 million generations sampled every 5,000th generation, from which the maximum clade credibility tree is shown. The tree height was set to 1, with 0 being present day, measured from the root (1) to the tips (0) and 95% credibility intervals of the node heights (error bars) are only shown when the posterior probabilities were 0.95 and above. Dots with numbers correspond to the various fungal Soa1 orthologues tested for substrate preference after expression in the S. cerevisiae sul1Δ sul2Δ soa1Δ strain. The collapsed groups 4 and 5 are shown in full in Supplementary Data. (b) Substrate preference of SoA1 orthologues expressed in the S. cerevisiae sul1Δ sul2Δ soa1Δ strain. The NatMX cassette in the SOA1 locus of the sul1Δ sul2Δ soa1Δ strain was replaced with gene sequences encoding fungal SOA1 orthologues from different phylogenetic groups as indicated. The growth with sulfonates, choline sulfate, sulfite and sulfate (at 0.2 and 40 mM for high- and low-affinity transport) as sole sulfur source was assayed in liquid medium and growth with methionine was used as positive control. Growth curves were fitted to logistic growth models, except for two cultures of S. cerevisiae expressing F. oxysporum ENH65823, showing atypical growth dynamics, which were fitted to a smoothed spline in the linear growth phase. The A. nidulans predicted proteins 2 (XP_681611) and 3 (CBF80346) are potential splice variants derived from the same locus AN8342, although the existence of XP_681611 mRNA was rejected from the current gene model (

The 1,011 unique genes were present in 356 strains from 254 species in 147 genera, indicating multiple gene duplication events as previously described30. The highest number was present in the Brassica plant pathogen Verticillium longisporum with 18 paralogous genes. The duplications were highly variable within the genera, for example, in Aspergillus and Fusarium. In addition to the strain-specific duplications, we also observed mosaic-like patterns in the sense that sometimes orthologues from the same taxonomic group clustered closely together, whereas in other cases orthologues from different taxonomic groups clustered closely together. This was most prominent in Group 1, the astA-related group, in which most orthologues were derived from the two Sodariomycete genera Fusarium and Verticillium. On the other hand, this group only contained four orthologues from the Aspergillus genus, whereas many members of this genus were present in the other groups. This shows that the astA gene has been duplicated preferentially in a few genera, while remaining scarce or being functionally lost in other genera, suggesting adaptation to the presence of different sulfur compounds in specific ecological niches.

Expression of putative sulfonate carriers in yeast

Next, we tested whether selected orthologues of SOA1 could complement the absence of sulfur compound uptake in the sul1Δ sul2Δ soa1Δ strain, when inserted into the SOA1 locus. We have selected orthologues from all major groups and expressed most paralogues from the same organism in S. cerevisiae. In addition to S. cerevisiae SOA1, we selected SOA1 and SOA2 from S. uvarum and S. eubayanus. The selected genes were inserted at the SOA1 locus by CRISPR targeting of the nourseothricin marker in the strain sul1Δ sul2Δ soa1Δ. The 20 transformants carrying each a different putative sulfur compound transporter, plus the untransformed sul1Δ sul2Δ soa1Δ strain, were assayed for growth in liquid medium containing one of 15 sulfur compounds as the sole sulfur source. Figure 4b summarizes the results for the maximum growth rate μ of all strain/sulfur compound combinations, whereas experimental results, lag phases and maximal densities are available in Supplementary Data 2. The transformants were grown with a selected sulfur source on minimal medium maximally depleted for any sulfur source. The residual sulfate concentration was 1.4 μM, which was enough to sustain limited residual growth with two orthologues from the astA group, including astA from the A. nidulans IAM 2006 strain, but not with SOA1 from S. cerevisiae (Supplementary Fig. 3).

The representatives from Group 4 and 5 generally showed poor growth with any of the inorganic and organic sulfur sources (except with the amino acid methionine), whereas in the groups 1, 2 and 3 there was good to very good growth with multiple sulfur sources for several members (Fig. 4b). Nearly all these members, however, belonged to the Saccharomycetaceae, with the orthologue from Metarhizium robertsii being the only exception. The latter showed an intermediate profile with good growth only on some of the sulfonates. The M. robertsii and S. eubayanus SOA1 orthologues have the highest specificity for sulfonates of all carriers tested, whereas the Ogatea parapolymorpha orthologue was the most promiscuous carrier, transporting all 15 sulfur sources tested, even sulfate at low concentration (Fig. 4b). The members of the astA group that showed significant growth had a clear preference for inorganic sulfur sources, with choline sulfate being the only organic sulfur source supporting good growth. Good growth on sulfite correlates in all cases with good growth on high sulfate levels. Taurine, L-cysteic acid and sulfoacetic acid generally supported no or poor growth with all tested orthologues (Fig. 4b).

Saccharomyces species SOA2

Besides SOA1, which was conserved in all Saccharomyces sensu stricto species in its location on chromosome 9 (except for Schefflera arboricola), we have discovered a new gene (SOA2) that appeared only in intact form in S. uvarum and S. eubayanus on chromosome 15. We also identified a SOA2 open reading frame (ORF) in S. arboricola that was not previously described in the genome assembly. Thus, S. uvarum, S. eubayanus and S. arboricola, which split 20 million years ago from the remaining Saccharomyces species31, may encode two sulfonate transporters in their genome. The Soa1 and Soa2 transporters have a typical predicted 12-helix transmembrane structure with two cytosolic termini and a conserved 56–58-aa-long cytosolic loop separating two 6-helical bundles (Fig. 5a). The Soa2 gene products in S. uvarum, S. eubayanus and S. arboricola were highly similar to the corresponding parts of the products of the S. cerevisiae uncharacterized ORFs YOL163W and YOL162W, which are present in a similar position on chromosome 15 (except in S. arboricola). Eighty-two per cent and 73% of their residues were identical to those in the corresponding parts of S. uvarum Soa2, respectively. In S. cerevisiae, a large amino-terminal part of the Soa2 gene product is missing and a stop codon is present between the sequences encoding transmembrane domain 6 and 7 (Fig. 5a). As these genes are also highly upregulated under sulfur starvation conditions18, it appears that YOL163W and YOL162W are inactive evolutionary leftovers of a functional SOA2 gene. The relatively low sequence identity of 40–41% at the protein level between the paralogous genes SOA1 and SOA2, and the recent loss of function of the SOA2-like ORFs (YOL162WYOL163W) in S. cerevisiae in the group of Saccharomyces sensu stricto species that is estimated to have evolved 20 million years ago31, suggest that they originate from a much more ancient gene duplication.

Figure 5: Comparison of SOA1 and SOA2 in Saccharomyces yeasts.

(a) Orthologous genes to S. cerevisiae SOA1 were present in all the Saccharomyces sensu stricto species, whereas SOA2 orthologues were only present in S. arboricola, S. uvarum and S. eubayanus. This is consistent with an early split in evolution since these species have the earliest split time of all Saccharomyces species. The previously uncharacterized S. cerevisiae genes YOL163W and YOL162W are split ORFs with high sequence similarity to the corresponding parts in S. uvarum SOA2. The topology and orientation of the S. cerevisiae SOA1 and S. uvarum SOA2 encoded transporters were predicted with TMPred and the predicted structure was plotted with Protter. (b) Substrate preference of S. uvarum Soa1 and Soa2. The SOA1 and SOA2 genes of S. uvarum were deleted in the diploid CBS7001 strain, the strain was sporulated and segregants containing either wild-type genes, or single or double deletions were selected. These were assayed for growth in liquid media at 25 °C with various sulfonates as sole source of sulfur. The results shown are the average for strains from two independent tetrads.

The S. uvarum, S. eubayanus and S. arboricola SOA1 and SOA2 genes may encode two sulfonate transporters that complement each other. Indeed, single deletion of SOA1 or SOA2 in S. uvarum resulted in a very similar sulfur compound utilization profile as the parental wild-type strain, whereas double deletion of SOA1 and SOA2 caused a strong reduction of growth with mainly the sulfonate compounds as the sole source of sulfur (Fig. 5b). Only growth with butanesulfonate and hydroxymethane sulfonate was just partially dependent on Soa1 and Soa2. Growth with sulfite, choline sulfate and sulfate was not dependent on Soa1 and Soa2.

Adjacent genes syntenic with SOA1

We also investigated the sequence similarity of the two adjacent genes on each side of S. cerevisiae SOA1 (syntenic upstream and downstream). The SDL1 and NIT1 genes flanking SOA1 upstream and downstream, respectively, are present as inactivated forms in the laboratory yeast S288C, due to the presence of a nonsense mutation in the middle of the genes, and we therefore used the wine yeast EC1118 full-length versions. None of the two genes was as conserved in fungi as SOA1. The product of the NIT1 gene downstream of SOA1 showed high sequence similarity to multiple predicted proteins from proteobacteria (Supplementary Data 3). Hence, the NIT1 gene seems to have been transferred similarly as the BDS1 sulfatase gene by horizontal gene transfer from proteobacteria32. The BDS1 sulfatase gene is found syntenic with SOA2 in S. cerevisiae, S. uvarum, S. eubayanus and S. Arboricola, and is responsible for their unique sulfatase activity32. NIT1 and SDL1 are highly upregulated when the yeast is supplied with less preferred nitrogen sources33. However, none of the yeast species tested with functional NIT1 and SDL1 genes could use the nitrogen in taurine or in glucosinolates (sinigrin), isothiocyanates (butyl and phenyl ethyl isothiocyanate), or ammonium sulfamate.


In the present study we have identified the last remaining transporter of sulfur compounds in the yeast S. cerevisiae. Previous research had shown that deletion of the two major sulfate transporter genes SUL1 and SUL2 did not prevent growth with high sulfate concentrations, nor with alternative sulfur sources such as sulfite and thiosulfate16,20,21. We have now shown that additional deletion of only one predicted transporter gene, encoded by YIL166C or SOA1, completely abolishes any residual growth of a sul1Δ sul2Δ strain with all sulfur sources, except for sulfur-containing amino acids, which are known to be transported by amino acid carriers34,35. As a consequence, the sul1Δ sul2Δ soa1Δ strain is an excellent tool for expression of heterologous candidate transporters of sulfur-containing compounds and determination of their substrate specificity and transport kinetics. The strain also allows to exclude any uptake of trace amounts of sulfur containing breakdown products from for instance sulfur-containing amino acid analogues.

We surprisingly show that the SOA1 gene product functions as the main sulfonate transporter in S. cerevisiae. Growth of S. cerevisiae and other ascomycetes with sulfonates as the sole source of sulfur has previously been demonstrated and enzymes responsible for sulfonate breakdown were also identified8,9; however, the transporter(s) responsible for sulfonate uptake have remained unknown. Soa1 has broad substrate specificity taking up multiple types of sulfonates with medium affinity and likely to be using proton symport. Sulfonates are a major source of sulfur in certain soils. In forest soils, for instance, the majority of available sulfur is carbon bound and only 5% on average is present as inorganic sulfur36,37. A report on tropical forest soils shows that 78–97% of available sulfur is present under the form of sulfonates and 27–57% of the organic sulfur could be mobilized by the microbial population within 24 h (ref. 3), underscoring the physiological role of sulfonate uptake. Here we have demonstrated that the S. cerevisiae Soa1 sulfonate transporter is crucial for uptake of the naturally occurring L-cysteic acid, taurine, isethionate and a range of the other aliphatic sulfonates. Moreover, our study revealed that orthologues of this transporter are widely distributed and conserved in genetically distant fungi. For example, the endogenous transporters of the O. parapolymorpha and M. robertsii fungi have a similar capacity for sulfonate transport as Soa1. It seems that we have identified a family of organic sulfur transporters that are critical for fungal survival in ecological niches with low inorganic sulfur, from which fungi are frequently isolated. On the other hand, our results with the closest Soa1 orthologue AstA from A. nidulans, expressed in the S. cerevisiae sul1Δ sul2Δ soa1Δ strain, showed that it functions mainly as a high-affinity sulfate transporter, whereas it supports only poor growth with sulfonates. The other orthologues of the Soa1 family for which we tested support of growth after expression in the S. cerevisiae sul1Δ sul2Δ soa1Δ strain displayed a diversity of substrate preferences for sulfur compounds, indicating that sequence conservation in the Soa1 family is not correlated with conservation of substrate preference. Finally, it has to be emphasized that expression of the heterologous transporters in S. cerevisiae may lead to structural modifications not occurring in the original host, which in principle could have an effect on substrate specificity and/or uptake kinetics.

Sulfonate metabolism has been investigated in great detail in bacteria6,38. The utilization of sulfonates in Escherichia coli resembles that of S. cerevisiae, which can degrade alkanesulfonates, L-cysteic acid and taurine, but not aromatic sulfonates39, whereas other bacteria have an extended substrate range due to specific transport and degradation enzymes encoded on dedicated operons for, for example, N-acetyltaurine40, isethionate13, sulfoacetate14, 4-toluenesulfonate41 and aromatic sulfonates42. Some bacteria can use both the carbon and nitrogen in sulfonates to support growth and some can accomplish this even anaerobically43,44,45. Specific operons for sulfonate degradation have been found in the soil bacteria C. necator and Comamonas testosteroni, and for choline sulfate in the soil and gut bacterium Bacillus subtilis46, suggesting the degradation of these sulfur compounds can provide specialist bacteria with an added fitness bonus by having an extended range of nutrients. In the present study, we show that transporters from S. cerevisae, S. uvarum, S. eubayanus, M. robertsii and O. parapolymorpha have a broad substrate range for sulfonates, and show that the S. cerevisiae transporter Soa1 has medium affinity for isethionate. In contrast to our findings with the fungal transporters, which have rather broad substrate specificity and are likely to function as proton symporters, bacteria contain specific ATP-driven sulfonate and choline sulfate transporters6,46.

The overlap in ecological niches between bacteria and fungi, and the fierce competition for scarce nutrients in nature, could be consistent with the existence of multiple specialized transporters. Except for M. robertsii, which is found in high titres in grassland soils that are rich in sulfate esters, consistent with the activity of the M. robertsii AstA gene (Fig. 4b), the yeast species investigated in our work live in widely varying environments, for example, bark, fruits, insects and soil, and can be considered generalists. Heterologous expression of the highly duplicated SOA1 orthologues from the specialist plant pathogens Fusarium oxysporum and V. longisporum may reveal specific fungal high-affinity sulfonate transporters, which may provide a fitness advantage in their natural niche.

Our extensive phylogenetic analysis of fungal SOA1 orthologues has led to several conclusions. First of all, we have learned that Soa1 belongs to a very large family of fungal transporters of which the substrate specificity was not well known. Second, that subdivision of the large Soa1 family based on sequence similarity fits approximately with subdivision based on substrate specificity. For instance, the astA subfamily mainly transports inorganic sulfur compounds and choline sulfate, whereas the transporters more closely related to Soa1 are in general also able to transport a range of sulfonates. Third, it has revealed the presence of many duplicated sequences, such as SOA1 and SOA2, supporting the significance of ‘non-classical’ sulfur sources for growth and survival of fungi in nature. Fourth, we have found strong conservation of the Soa1 family in fungi, with members in all taxonomic divisions from the lower primitive groups to the highly evolved basidiomycetes. This again underscores the importance of these carriers and their substrates for the fungal kingdom.

Surprisingly, S. cerevisiae contains two partial genes, YOL163W and YOL162W, with sequence similarity to the corresponding parts of SOA1 and which seem to be evolutionary leftovers of an ancient SOA2 gene. Interestingly, this SOA2 gene has been conserved in functional form in three species of the Saccharomyces genus, S. uvarum, S. eubayanus and S. arboricola, whereas in the other species, S. kudriavzevii, S. paradoxus and S. mikatae, SOA2 has apparently been completely lost. This might be related to the role of sulfonates as source of sulfur in the ecological niches where the different species generally survive. S. uvarum and S. eubayanus prefer more cold-temperate climates and both have been found in association with trees47. However, the connection with sulfonate availability is not obvious. The same is true for the other species, as they have been found in a variety of different habitats, including soils and different parts of trees. Outside of the human-made environments, for instance, for the production of alcoholic beverages, S. cerevisiae and the other species have been isolated from bark and exudates of oak and pine trees48,49,50,51, and nothofagus trees52, and it was not until recently that a thorough characterization of wild S. cerevisiae strains was performed in isolated tropical forests in China, far away from human activity53. The genetic variability of the S. cerevisiae strains isolated in this study from the primeval tropical forests on the island of Hainan was as large as that of the entire population of S. cerevisiae strains isolated up till then. Hence, tropical forests may be a major original niche for S. cerevisiae54. Comparative research on the niches in which the different Saccharomyces species are found in these forests might reveal a link with the presence of sulfonates as sulfur sources and the functional conservation of the SOA2-encoded sulfonate transporter.

Our results show that Soa1 has a similar Ks (half-velocity constant) for growth with sulfite as Sul1 and Sul2. Hence, Soa1 is a major sulfite carrier of S. cerevisiae. Sulfite is commonly used in the wine industry as an anti-contaminant and antioxidant, but its addition lowers ethanol yield and increases glycerol production by making a conjugate with acetaldehyde55. Wine strains often have enhanced tolerance to sulfite, which has been related to upregulation of the SSU1 gene, encoding a sulfite efflux pump23,24,25. Our results suggest that inactivation of Soa1 by deletion of the SOA1 gene might offer an additional approach to further enhance sulfite tolerance of wine yeast strains.

Another group of widely distributed organic sulfur compounds are sulfate esters, of which choline sulfate is well known to be important for sulfur turnover in the soil1,2. They are present in soils, being released by bacteria and taken up by roots of plants56. Sulfate esters have been proposed as a significant source of sulfate in soils through hydrolysis by microbial sulfatases57. However, sulfate esters can also serve as an intracellular source of sulfate. Many years ago, it was already demonstrated that A. nidulans could use choline sulfate as a source of sulfur, and that it was taken up by a different mechanism from that used for inorganic sulfate transport58. In related work, evidence was provided for a highly specific uptake system for choline sulfate59. A. nidulans is able to grow on a range of aliphatic and aromatic sulfate esters including the cyanogenic glucosinolate sinigrin60. Up to now, no fungal transporter for choline sulfate has been identified. Our experimental screening of multiple orthologues of the Soa1 fungal family has identified a functional choline sulfate transporter from A. nidulans, M. robertsii and O. parapolymorha (Fig. 4b). Together with S. cerevisiae Sul1, Sul2 and Soa1, these are choline sulfate transporters identified in fungi. However, none of these are specific for choline sulfate or sulfate esters in general, nor even for organic sulfur compounds. All six are also able to transport for instance sulfate and sulfite (Fig. 4).

In summary, our work has identified Soa1 as the last remaining inorganic sulfate transporter in S. cerevisiae, responsible for uptake of sulfate, sulfite and thiosulfate. Soa1 also functions as a sulfonate transporter. We have shown the usefulness of the S. cerevisiae sul1Δ sul2Δ soa1Δ strain for characterization of sulfur compound uptake of heterologous transporters by expressing 20 members of the fungal Soa1 family in this strain. This revealed a diversity of substrate preferences for sulfur-containing compounds, including other transporters for sulfonates and fungal transporters for a sulfate ester, that is, choline sulfate. Our findings underscore the ecological importance of these compounds as sources of sulfur in nature and suggest that there may be other ecologically relevant nutrients for which transporters have not been discovered yet in fungi.


Yeast strains

The yeast strains used in this study are shown in Table 1.

Table 1 Strains used in this study.

Sulfur compounds

The sulfur compounds were of high-grade purity from Sigma-Aldrich or Merck. Choline sulfate was custom-made by ChiroBlock GmbH to minimum 95% purity and guaranteed to contain no detectable amounts of other sulfur compounds. The synthesis was carried out by incubating the choline bromide salt mixed with Ag2SO4 in ultra pure water and incubating for 2 weeks at 100 °C with stirring. The liquid was crystallized repeatedly to obtain 95% purity without any detectable reagent compounds as followed by NMR and mass spectrometry.

Growth conditions and sulfur starvation

Cells were grown from OD 0.2 to OD 1 in yeast extract, peptone, dextrose (YPD) and starved for sulfur during 3 days in synthetic close-to-sulfur-free B medium (with 1.4 μM residual sulfate) composed according to Cherest et al.61 and containing 4% glucose refreshed every day. Growth assays with the sulfur compounds as the sole source of sulfur were performed in the sulfur starvation medium, adjusted to pH 6.5 with hydrochloric acid (Sigma-Aldrich TraceSELECT Ultra) in 7 mM K2HPO4. The concentration of the supplied sulfur compounds was 200 μM, except where otherwise indicated. The pH profile of growth with sulfite was assayed in sulfur starvation medium buffered at the appropriate pH with 20 mM K2HPO4 and 20 mM malic acid. Cells were washed three times in sulfur starvation medium before being used for growth experiments.

Yeast genetic modification

A prototrophic sul1Δ::KanMX sul2Δ::KanMX strain was made by crossing the two single deletion strains from the BY deletion collection and subsequent backcrossing to S288c. The YIL166C(SOA1), YGR125W and YCR003C genes were deleted by replacing the ORF with a split nourseothricin marker (NatMX) fused with 400–500 bp flanking regions to facilitate homologous recombination. LiAc transformation was done according to standard protocols. Transformation of S. uvarum was performed as for S. cerevisiae, except that heat shock was carried out for 1 h at 37 °C, and cells were grown at 25 °C. To obtain SOA1 and SOA2 single and double deletions in S. uvarum, the genes were first deleted in the homozygous diploid S. uvarum CBS7001-type strain with the KanMX and NatMX marker, respectively. Segregants were then obtained by sporulating the strain for 5 days at 23 °C and subsequent tetrad dissection. The segregants were then tested for the resistance markers to select single and double deletions.

CRISPR-mediated gene exchange

Standard CRISPR/Cas9 technology was used62. The guide RNA plasmid and the Cas9 expression plasmid were based on the paper by DiCarlo et al.63, with the auxotrophic marker changed for the antibiotic resistance marker as indicated and the cloning site modified for Gibson assembly. Putative fungal transporter genes were inserted into the soa1::NatMX locus by targeting the NatMX marker with the following guide RNA: 5′-TGTCCTCGACGGTCAGCCGG-3′ (PAM sites were present both in the seed sequence and the target site). The gRNA was designed for S. cerevisiae with DNA 2.0 CRISPR gRNA design tool and checked for potential off-targeting with BLAST. A single copy Cas9 constitutive expression plasmid with a phleomycin marker (BleMX) was transformed in the sul1Δ::KanMX sul2Δ::KanMX soa1Δ::NatMX strain. This strain was then transformed with a PCR-amplified fungal transporter gene together with a multicopy plasmid expressing a Nat-specific gRNA and a hygromycin selection marker (hphMX). Oligos with 60–70 bp SOA1 flanking sequences were used to PCR amplify genomic DNA from S. cerevisiae S288c, S. uvarum CBS7001, S. eubayanus CBS12357 and O. parapolymorpha DL-1. Genes encoding Soa1 transporter orthologues from A. nidulans, M. robertsii and F. oxysporum were codon optimized for expression in S. cerevisiae and synthesized by Gen9, Inc. (Cambridge, USA) and IDT (Leuven, Belgium). The transformed amplicons with these genes also contained 112 bp upstream and 84 bp downstream SOA1 flanking sequences. All orthologues expressed in S. cerevisae, either obtained by amplification from genomic DNA or by gene synthesis based on codon-optimized predicted protein sequences, have been submitted to GenBank with the following accession numbers: KX912914-KX912934.

Sulfur compound uptake experiments

Radioactively labelled [1-C14] isethionate, [1,2-C14] taurine and [S35] Na2SO4 were obtained from American Radiolabeled Chemicals, Inc. Unless otherwise mentioned, 40 μl of sulfur-starved cell suspension (120 mg wet weight ml−1) buffered in 10 mM Bis-Tris pH 6.5 was pre-incubated for 10 min at 30 °C, after which 10 μl of radioactive stock solution was added to a total volume of 50 μl. The cells were incubated for 1 min for sulfate and 5 min for isethionate and taurine, and immediately separated on a glass microfibre filter and washed twice with 10 mM ice-cold unlabelled sulfur compound solution and once with cold demi water. The filter was then placed in a vial with addition of 5 ml of scintillation liquid and radioactivity was measured with a Hidex 300 SL liquid scintillation counter. The final specific activities of the radioactive stocks were 26,540 c.p.m. nmol−1 (final concentration 200 μM) and 355 c.p.m. nmol−1 (final concentration 40 mM) for sulfate, 7,390 c.p.m. nmol−1 (for final concentration of 50 μM) and 771 c.p.m. nmol−1 (for final concentration of 500 μM) for isethionate and 764 c.p.m. nmol−1 (final concentration 3.6 mM) for taurine. For kinetic measurements, dilutions were made to final concentrations of 0.67–50 μM for sulfate (from a 200 μM stock), 10–500 μM for isethionate (10–50 μM from a 50 μM stock and 100–500 μM from a 500 μM stock) and 0.2–3.6 mM for taurine (from a 3.6 mM stock). The dilutions were confirmed to have a specific activity very similar to the original stocks. To determine the pH profile of transport, cells were buffered in 100 mM malic acid pH 4–6, Bis-Tris pH 6–7 or Tris pH 7–9. To abolish the proton gradient and test for H+ symport, we incubated 30 μl sulfur-starved cell suspension (160 mg wet weight ml−1) buffered in 10 mM Bis-Tris pH 6.5 with 10 μl of CCCP dissolved in methanol/water for 10 min at 30 °C before the transport measurement. The final concentration of methanol was kept constant at 1.5%, also in the negative control.

Phylogenetic analysis

A protein BLASTP (BLAST 2.2.29+ standalone) search was performed against the non-redundant protein database (last accessed October 2015) and subsequently filtered for a minimum of 40% identity in 90% of the sequence of each High Scoring Pair with an e-value of ≤1e−40. The F. oxysporum ENH65823 sequence was selected for inclusion in the final tree from a group of plant pathogen fungal sequences, showing early divergence in a preliminary tree made with less stringent criteria. This protein was branching off with the astA high-affinity sulfate transporters and was also predicted to be the earliest diverging protein with Bayesian evolutionary analysis (Fig. 4a). However, the S. cerevisiae cells expressing the ENH65823 protein only showed very low residual growth with 40 mM sulfate (Fig. 4b and Supplementary Data 2) and further interpretation of which transport function was derived first therefore remains speculative. Orthologues from the Saccharomyces sensu stricto species S. uvarum, S. mikatae and S. paradoxus were added using the genomic sequence (from the Saccharomyces sensu stricto resources web site: so that a total of 1,099 unique protein sequences was reached. To filter out non-functional, truncated proteins, as well as oversized proteins compromising the alignment score, a size window requirement was set at 350–650 aa. This finally yielded 1,011 unique protein sequences, which were clustered with BLASTCLUST (part of the BLAST 2.2.14 standalone package) based on 99% similarity within 90% of the sequence of each High Scoring Pair, so that a final number of 828 clusters was obtained (Supplementary Data 1). Next, a sequence from each cluster was selected and aligned with TCOFFEE (psi-coffee) and conserved blocks were extracted with Gblocks (0.91b), arriving at a total length of 296 aa, which were used to make the final gene tree with BEAST 2 (v. 2.3.1)64. The best fit was a Yule birth model with a uniform prior and eight gamma categories of heterogeneity. The effective sample size was >1,200 for all variables. A chain of 70 million generations, sampled at 5,000 generation intervals, was used to make the maximum clade credibility tree with a 12% burnin by TreeAnnotator. The results were validated with a separate chain. Only nodes with a posterior probability of ≥0.95 were annotated with 95% credible intervals. Taxonomic information was extracted from NCBI with Bioconductor and the tree was visualized with iTOL and FigTree v. 1.4.2.

Determination of growth rates

All growth experiments were carried out in duplicate, except for determination of half-velocity constants (Ks) for sulfite and thiosulfate, which was done in triplicate. Unless otherwise mentioned, the mean values of the cell densities were fitted to logistic and generalized logistic models (Richards), from which the maximal growth rates (μ), maximal densities (A) and the lag phases (λ) were estimated with the R package GroFit65. In case of slow/residual growth (μ<0.01) the lag phase estimates are not reported. The cultures of S. cerevisiae expressing F. oxysporum ENH65823 with L-cysteic acid and 40 mM sulfate as the sole sulfur source displayed an atypical growth behaviour. Maximal growth rates for these atypical curves were fitted with a smoothed spline for the linear exponential growth phase between OD 0.2 and 0.4.

Reproducibility of the results

All experimental results were at least duplicated for confirmation.

Data availability

Accession codes for sequence data deposited at GenBank: KX912914-KX912934. All the remaining data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its Supplementary Information files, and from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Additional information

How to cite this article: Holt, S. et al. Major sulfonate transporter Soa1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and considerable substrate diversity in its fungal family. Nat. Commun. 8, 14247 doi: 10.1038/ncomms14247 (2017).

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Accession codes




  1. 1

    Fitzgerald, J. W. in Sulfur in the Environment, part II Ecological Impacts , part II Ecological Impacts (ed. Nriagu, J. O.) 391–443 (Wiley, 1978).

  2. 2

    Fitzgerald, J. W., Ash, J. T., Strickland, T. C. & Swank, W. T. Formation of organic sulfur in forest soils: a biologically mediated process. Can. J. Forest Res. 13, 1077–1082 (1983).

  3. 3

    Stanko-Golden, K. M. & Fitzgerald, J. W. Sulfur transformations and pool sizes in tropical forest soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 23, 1053–1058 (1991).

  4. 4

    Fritzgerald, J. W., Swank, W. T. & Strickland, T. C. Sulfur pools and transformations in litter and surface soil of a hardwood forest. Ecol. Studies 66, 245–253 (1988).

  5. 5

    Huxtable, R. J. Physiollogical actions of taurine. Physiol. Rev. 72, 101–163 (1992).

  6. 6

    Kertesz, M. A. Riding the sulfur cycle--metabolism of sulfonates and sulfate esters in gram-negative bacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 24, 135–175 (1999).

  7. 7

    Ellis, H. R. Mechanism for sulfur acquisition by the alkanesulfonate monooxygenase system. Bioorg. Chem. 39, 178–184 (2011).

  8. 8

    Hogan, D. A., Auchtung, T. A. & Hausinger, R. P. Cloning and characterization of a sulfonate/alpha-ketoglutarate dioxygenase from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Bacteriol. 181, 5876–5879 (1999).

  9. 9

    Linder, T. Genomics of alternative sulfur utilization in ascomycetous yeasts. Microbiology 158, 2585–2597 (2012).

  10. 10

    Kensche, P. R., Oti, M., Dutilh, B. E. & Huynen, M. A. Conservation of divergent transcription in fungi. Trends Genet. 24, 207–211 (2008).

  11. 11

    Pilsyk, S. & Paszewski, A. Sulfate permeases—phylogenetic diversity of sulfate transport. Acta Biochem. Pol. 56, 375–384 (2009).

  12. 12

    Pilsyk, S., Natorff, R., Sienko, M. & Paszewski, A. Sulfate transport in Aspergillus nidulans: a novel gene encoding alternative sulfate transporter. Fungal Genet. Biol. 44, 715–725 (2007).

  13. 13

    Weinitschke, S., Sharma, P. I., Stingl, U., Cook, A. M. & Smits, T. H. Gene clusters involved in isethionate degradation by terrestrial and marine bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 76, 618–621 (2010).

  14. 14

    Weinitschke, S. et al. Sulfoacetate is degraded via a novel pathway involving sulfoacetyl-CoA and sulfoacetaldehyde in Cupriavidus necator H16. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 35249–35254 (2010).

  15. 15

    Breton, A. & Surdin-Kerjan, Y. Sulfate uptake in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: biochemical and genetic study. J. Bacteriol. 132, 224–232 (1977).

  16. 16

    Cherest, H. et al. Molecular characterization of two high affinity sulfate transporters in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 145, 627–635 (1997).

  17. 17

    Takahashi, H., Buchner, P., Yoshimoto, N., Hawkesford, M. J. & Shiu, S. H. Evolutionary relationships and functional diversity of plant sulfate transporters. Front. Plant Sci. 2, 119 (2011).

  18. 18

    Boer, V. M., de Winde, J. H., Pronk, J. T. & Piper, M. D. The genome-wide transcriptional responses of Saccharomyces cerevisiae grown on glucose in aerobic chemostat cultures limited for carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus, or sulfur. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 3265–3274 (2003).

  19. 19

    Marzluf, G. A. Molecular genetics of sulfur assimilation in filamentous fungi and yeast. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 51, 73–96 (1997).

  20. 20

    Kankipati, H. N., Rubio-Texeira, M., Castermans, D., Diallinas, G. & Thevelein, J. M. Sul1 and Sul2 sulfate transceptors signal to protein kinase A upon exit of sulfur starvation. J. Biol. Chem. 290, 10430–10446 (2015).

  21. 21

    Park, H. & Bakalinsky, A. T. Evidence for sulfite proton symport in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 14, 967–971 (2004).

  22. 22

    Stratford, M. & Rose, A. H. Transport of sulphur dioxide by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiology 132, 1–6 (1986).

  23. 23

    Park, H. & Bakalinsky, A. T. SSU1 mediates sulphite efflux in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 16, 881–888 (2000).

  24. 24

    Nardi, T., Corich, V., Giacomini, A. & Blondin, B. A sulphite-inducible form of the sulphite efflux gene SSU1 in a Saccharomyces cerevisiae wine yeast. Microbiology 156, 1686–1696 (2010).

  25. 25

    Goto-Yamamoto, N. et al. SSU1-R, a sulfite resistance gene of wine yeast, is an allele of SSU1 with a different upstream sequence. J. Ferment. Bioeng. 86, 427–433 (1998).

  26. 26

    Tweedie, J. W. & Segel, I. H. Specificity of transport processes for sulfur, selenium, and molybdenum anions by filamentous fungi. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 196, 95–106 (1970).

  27. 27

    Pilsyk, S., Natorff, R., Gawinska-Urbanowicz, H. & Kruszewska, J. S. Fusarium sambucinum astA gene expressed during potato infection is a functional orthologue of Aspergillus nidulans astA. Fungal Biol. 119, 509–517 (2015).

  28. 28

    Lucking, R., Huhndorf, S., Pfister, D. H., Plata, E. R. & Lumbsch, H. T. Fungi evolved right on track. Mycologia 101, 810–822 (2009).

  29. 29

    Berbee, M. L. & Taylor, J. W. Dating the molecular clock in fungi–how close are we? Fungal Biol. Rev. 24, 1–16 (2010).

  30. 30

    Hellborg, L., Woolfit, M., Arthursson-Hellborg, M. & Piskur, J. Complex evolution of the DAL5 transporter family. BMC Genomics 9, 164 (2008).

  31. 31

    Scannell, D. R. et al. The awesome power of yeast evolutionary genetics: new genome sequences and strain resources for the Saccharomyces sensu stricto genus. G3 (Bethesda) 1, 11–25 (2011).

  32. 32

    Hall, C., Brachat, S. & Dietrich, F. S. Contribution of horizontal gene transfer to the evolution of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Eukaryot. Cell 4, 1102–1115 (2005).

  33. 33

    Godard, P. et al. Effect of 21 different nitrogen sources on global gene expression in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell Biol. 27, 3065–3086 (2007).

  34. 34

    Thomas, D. & Surdin-Kerjan, Y. Metabolism of sulfur amino acids in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 61, 503–532 (1997).

  35. 35

    Sophianopoulou, V. & Diallinas, G. Amino acid transporters of lower eukaryotes: regulation, structure and topogenesis. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 16, 53–75 (1995).

  36. 36

    Autry, A. R. & Fitzgerald, J. W. Sulfonate S: a major form of forest soil organic sulfur. Biol. Fertil. Soils 10, 50–56 (1990).

  37. 37

    Watwood, M. E., Fitzgerald, J. W. & Gosz, J. R. Sulfur processing in forest soil and litter along an elevational and vegetative gradient. Can. J. Forest Res. 16, 689–695 (1986).

  38. 38

    Cook, A. M., Laue, H. & Junker, F. Microbial desulfonation. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 22, 399–419 (1998).

  39. 39

    van der Ploeg, J. R., Eichhorn, E. & Leisinger, T. Sulfonate-sulfur metabolism and its regulation in Escherichia coli. Arch. Microbiol. 176, 1–8 (2001).

  40. 40

    Denger, K., Lehmann, S. & Cook, A. M. Molecular genetics and biochemistry of N-acetyltaurine degradation by Cupriavidus necator H16. Microbiology 157, 2983–2991 (2011).

  41. 41

    Mampel, J. et al. A novel outer-membrane anion channel (porin) as part of a putatively two-component transport system for 4-toluenesulphonate in Comamonas testosteroni T-2. Biochem. J. 383, 91–99 (2004).

  42. 42

    Junker, F. & Cook, A. M. Conjugative plasmids and the degradation of arylsulfonates in Comamonas testosteroni. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 63, 2403–2410 (1997).

  43. 43

    Bruggemann, C., Denger, K., Cook, A. M. & Ruff, J. Enzymes and genes of taurine and isethionate dissimilation in Paracoccus denitrificans. Microbiology 150, 805–816 (2004).

  44. 44

    Denger, K., Laue, H. & Cook, A. M. Anaerobic taurine oxidation: a novel reaction by a nitrate-reducing Alcaligenes sp. Microbiology 143, (Pt 6): 1919–1924 (1997).

  45. 45

    Laue, H., Denger, K. & Cook, A. M. Taurine reduction in anaerobic respiration of Bilophila wadsworthia RZATAU. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 63, 2016–2021 (1997).

  46. 46

    Nau-Wagner, G., Boch, J., Le Good, J. A. & Bremer, E. High-affinity transport of choline-O-sulfate and its use as a compatible solute in Bacillus subtilis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65, 560–568 (1999).

  47. 47

    Baker, E. et al. The genome sequence of Saccharomyces eubayanus and the domestication of lager-brewing yeasts. Mol. Biol. Evol. 32, 2818–2831 (2015).

  48. 48

    Yoneyama, M. Studies on yeasts isolated from pine honey II. Bot. Mag. Tokyo 70, 92–96 (1957).

  49. 49

    Naumov, G. I., Naumova, E. S. & Sniegowski, P. D. Saccharomyces paradoxus and Saccharomyces cerevisiae are associated with exudates of North American oaks. Can. J. Microbiol. 44, 1045–1050 (1998).

  50. 50

    Sniegowski, P. D., Dombrowski, P. G. & Fingerman, E. Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces paradoxus coexist in a natural woodland site in North America and display different levels of reproductive isolation from European conspecifics. FEMS Yeast Res. 1, 299–306 (2002).

  51. 51

    Sampaio, J. P. & Goncalves, P. Natural populations of Saccharomyces kudriavzevii in Portugal are associated with oak bark and are sympatric with S. cerevisiae and S. paradoxus. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74, 2144–2152 (2008).

  52. 52

    Libkind, D. et al. Microbe domestication and the identification of the wild genetic stock of lager-brewing yeast. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 14539–14544 (2011).

  53. 53

    Wang, Q. M., Liu, W. Q., Liti, G., Wang, S. A. & Bai, F. Y. Surprisingly diverged populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in natural environments remote from human activity. Mol. Ecol. 21, 5404–5417 (2012).

  54. 54

    Liti, G. The fascinating and secret wild life of the budding yeast S. cerevisiae. Elife 4, doi:10.7554/eLife.05835 (2015).

  55. 55

    Casalone, E. et al. Mechanism of resistance to sulphite in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Curr. Genet. 22, 435–440 (1992).

  56. 56

    Nissen, P. & Benson, A. A. Active transport of choline sulfate by barley roots. Plant Physiol. 39, 586–589 (1964).

  57. 57

    Fitzgerald, J. W. Sulfate ester formation and hydrolysis: a potentially important yet often ignored aspect of the sulfur cycle of aerobic soils. Bacteriol. Rev. 40, 698–721 (1976).

  58. 58

    Spencer, B., Hussey, E. C., Orsi, B. A. & Scott, J. M. Mechanism of choline O-sulphate utilization in fungi. Biochem. J. 106, 461–469 (1968).

  59. 59

    Bellenger, N., Nissen, P., Wood, T. C. & Segel, I. H. Specificity and control of choline-O-sulfate transport in filamentous fungi. J. Bacteriol. 96, 1574–1585 (1968).

  60. 60

    Paszewski, A., Brzywczy, J. & Natorff, R. Sulphur metabolism. Prog. Ind. Microbiol. 29, 299–319 (1994).

  61. 61

    Cherest, H. & Surdin-Kerjan, Y. Genetic analysis of a new mutation conferring cysteine auxotrophy in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: updating of the sulfur metabolism pathway. Genetics 130, 51–58 (1992).

  62. 62

    Ran, F. A. et al. Genome engineering using the CRISPR-Cas9 system. Nat. Protoc. 8, 2281–2308 (2013).

  63. 63

    DiCarlo, J. E. et al. Genome engineering in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using CRISPR-Cas systems. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, 4336–4343 (2013).

  64. 64

    Bouckaert, R. et al. BEAST 2: a software platform for Bayesian evolutionary analysis. PLoS Comput. Biol. 10, e1003537 (2014).

  65. 65

    Kahm, M., Hasenbrink, G., Lichtenberg-Frate, H., Ludwig, J. & Kschischo, M. grofit: fitting biological growth curves with R. J. Stat. Software 33, 1–21 (2010).

Download references


We thank the Carlsberg Research Laboratory, Copenhagen, Denmark, for providing part of the bioinformatics infrastructure. The phylogenetic calculations were carried out at the High Performance Computing (HPC) cluster of KU Leuven and we acknowledge the assistance of Martijn Oldenhof. We also acknowledge the expertise and help of Willy Verheyden with the radioactive uptake experiments and Nico Vangoethem for help with preparation of the figures. This work has been supported by grants from the Fund for Scientific Research–Flanders, Interuniversity Attraction Poles Network P7/40 and the Research Fund of the KU Leuven (Concerted Research Actions) to J.M.T.

Author information

The experiments on sulfonates were designed by S.H. and J.M.T. The experiments on low-affinity sulfate transport were designed by H.K., S.H., G.V.Z. and J.M.T. The experiments on sulfite and pH dependence were designed by S.H., S.D.G., M.R.F.-M. and J.M.T. CRISPR oligos were designed by S.H. and M.R.F.-M. The phylogenetic analysis was designed, analysed and carried out by S.H. and S.L. The experimental work was carried out and analysed by S.H., H.K. and S.D.G. The manuscript was written by S.H. and J.M.T. and edited by the co-authors.

Correspondence to Johan M. Thevelein.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figures. (PDF 1532 kb)

Supplementary Data 1

Identity of the SOA1 orthologs in the fungal phylogenetic tree. (XLSX 242 kb)

Supplementary Data 2

Growth values (Max. growth rate, Max. density and lag phase) with 95% confidence intervals, and raw optical densities (OD600) for the S. cerevisiae strain sul1Δ sul2Δ soa1Δ expressing fungal SOA1 orthologs. (XLSX 716 kb)

Supplementary Data 3

Homology search of genes flanking S. cerevisiae SOA1. (XLSX 163 kb)

Peer Review File (PDF 741 kb)

Rights and permissions

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.