Abstract
Scattering of light by matter has been studied extensively in the past. Yet, the most fundamental process, the scattering of a single photon by a single atom, is largely unexplored. One prominent prediction of quantum optics is the deterministic absorption of a travelling photon by a single atom, provided the photon waveform matches spatially and temporally the timereversed version of a spontaneously emitted photon. Here we experimentally address this prediction and investigate the influence of the photon’s temporal profile on the scattering dynamics using a single trapped atom and heralded single photons. In a timeresolved measurement of atomic excitation we find a 56(11)% increase of the peak excitation by photons with an exponentially rising profile compared with a decaying one. However, the overall scattering probability remains unchanged within the experimental uncertainties. Our results demonstrate that envelope tailoring of single photons enables precise control of the photon–atom interaction.
Introduction
The efficient excitation of atoms by light is a prerequisite for many proposed quantum information protocols. Strong lightmatter interaction by using either large ensembles of atoms^{1,2} or single atoms inside cavities^{3,4,5} has received much attention in the past. More recently, significant lightmatter interaction has also been observed between single quantum systems and weak coherent fields in free space^{6,7,8,9,10,11}. The timereversal symmetry of Schroedinger’s and Maxwell’s equations suggests that the conditions for perfect absorption of an incident single photon by a single atom in free space can be found from the reversed process, the spontaneous emission of a photon from an atom prepared in an excited state^{12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20}. There, the excited state population decays exponentially with a time constant given by the radiative lifetime τ_{0} of the excited state, and an outwardmoving photon with the same temporal decay profile emerges in a spatial field mode corresponding to the atomic dipole transition^{21}. Therefore, for efficient atomic excitation the incident photon should have an exponentially rising temporal envelope with a matching time constant τ_{0} and propagate in the atomic dipole mode towards the position of the atom^{22}.
For a more quantitative description of the scattering process we follow ref. 15, which assumes a stationary twolevel atom interacting with a propagating single photon in the WeisskopfWigner approximation. The photonatom interaction strength depends on the spatial overlap Λ ∈ [0,1] of the atomic dipole mode with the propagating mode of the photon, where Λ=1 corresponds to complete spatial mode overlap. We consider scattering of exponentially decaying and rising photons described by the probability amplitude ξ(t)
and
where Θ(t) is the Heaviside step function and τ_{p} is the coherence time of the photon. Integrating the equations of motion in ref. 15 leads to analytic expressions for the timedependent population P_{e}(t) in the excited state of the atom for both photon shapes:
and
In this work, we measure the atomic excited state population dynamics by scattering single photons with identical power spectrum, but different temporal envelopes. While the overall scattering probability only depends on the power spectrum, the dynamics depends on the temporal envelope of the incident photon. In particular, an exponentially rising envelope leads to a higher instantaneous excited state population than an exponentially decaying envelope.
Results
Experimental setup
In our experiment (Fig. 1), we focus single probe photons onto a single atom, and infer the atomic excited state population P_{e}(t) from photons arriving at the forward and backward detectors D_{f} and D_{b} (refs 23, 24, 25). We obtain P_{e}(t) directly from the atomic fluorescence measured at the backward detector D_{b} with the detection probability per unit time R_{b}(t),
where η_{b} is the collection efficiency. However, the detection rate in such an experiment is relatively small and therefore susceptible to detector noise. Alternatively, P_{e}(t) can be determined from the detection rate at the forward detector D_{f} with a better signaltonoise ratio. The probability per unit time of detecting a photon in the forward direction at time t is given by R_{f,0}(t)=ξ(t)^{2} without an atom, and by with an atom present. The atom alters the rate of transmitted photons via absorption and reemission towards the forward detector D_{f}. Therefore, any change δ(t) of the forward detection rate is directly related to a change of the atomic population,
The excited state population P_{e}(t) is then obtained by integrating a rate equation,
where the last term describes spontaneous emission into modes that do not overlap with the excitation mode.
A schematic of the experimental setup is shown in Fig. 2. A single ^{87}Rb atom is trapped at the joint focus of an aspheric lens pair (AL; numerical aperture 0.55) with a faroffresonant optical dipole trap (980 nm)^{8}. After molasses cooling, the trapped atom is optically pumped into the 5 S_{1/2}, F=2, m_{F}=−2 state. Probe photons are prepared by heralding on one photon of a timecorrelated photon pair generated via fourwavemixing (FWM) in a cloud of cold ^{87}Rb atoms^{26,27}. The relevant energy levels are depicted in Fig. 2b: two pump beams with wavelengths 795 and 762 nm excite the atoms from 5S_{1/2}, F=2 to 5D_{3/2}, F=3, and a subsequent ensembleenhanced cascade decay gives rise to the time ordering necessary for obtaining exponential time envelopes^{20,28,29}. Dichroic mirrors, interference filters and coupling into single mode fibres select photon pairs of wavelengths 776 nm (herald) and 780 nm (probe). Adjusting the atomic density of the atomic ensemble^{27}, we set the coherence time τ_{p}=13.3(1) ns of the generated photons, corresponding to a spectral overlap with the atomic linewidth of ∼90% (ref. 30).
To control the temporal envelope of the probe photon, the heralding mode is coupled to a bandwidthmatched, asymmetric FabryPerot cavity. The cavity reflects the herald photons with a dispersive phase shift depending on the cavity resonance frequency. Tuning the cavity on resonance or faroff resonance (70 MHz) with respect to the centre frequency of the herald photon results in exponentially rising or decaying probe photons^{20}. The FWM source alternates between a laser cooling interval of 140 μs, and a photon pair generation interval of 10 μs, during which we register on average 0.054 heralding events on avalanche photodetector D_{h}. The probe photons are guided to the single atom by a single mode fibre. The spatial excitation mode is then defined by the collimation lens at the output of the fibre and the high numerical aperture AL. From the experimental geometry, we expect a spatial mode overlap of Λ≈0.03 with the atomic dipole mode^{18}. The excitation mode is then collimated by a second aspheric lens, again coupled into a singlemode fibre, and sent to the forward detector D_{f}. A fraction of the photons scattered by the atom is collected in the backward direction, and similarly fibrecoupled and guided to detector D_{b}.
Timeresolved transmission of single photons
To investigate the dynamics of the scattering process, we record photoevent detection times at the forward detector D_{f} with respect to heralding events at D_{h}. When no atom is trapped, we obtain the reference histograms G_{f,0}(t_{i}) for exponentially decaying and rising probe photons, with time bins t_{i} of width Δt (Fig. 3, black circles). The observed histograms resemble closely the ideal asymmetric exponential envelopes, described by equations (1) and (2). The total probability of a coincidence event within a time interval of 114 ns (≈8 τ_{p}) is η_{f}=3.70(1) × 10^{−3}. When an atom is trapped, we record histograms G_{f}(t_{i}) (Fig. 3, red diamonds). The two histograms G_{f}(t_{i}) are very similar to the respective reference histograms G_{f,0}(t_{i}). To reveal the scattering dynamics, we obtain the photon detection probabilities per unit time at the forward detector R_{f}(t_{i})=G_{f}(t_{i})/(η_{f}Δt) with and without atom to use equations (6) and (7) to reconstruct the excited state population P_{e}(t_{i}). Figure 4 shows the difference δ(t_{i})=R_{f,0}(t_{i})−R_{f}(t_{i}) for both photon envelopes, with mostly positive values. A positive value of δ(t_{i}) corresponds to net absorption, that is, a reduction of the number of detected photons during the time bin t_{i} due to the interaction with the atom. For a photon with a decaying envelope, the absorption is close to zero at t_{i}=0, and reaches a maximum at t_{i}≈15 ns, followed by a slow decay. In strong contrast, the absorption for photons with a rising envelope follows the exponential envelope of the photon, with a maximum absorption rate twice as high as that for photons with a decaying envelope.
We obtain analytical solutions for the expected differences in transmission δ(t) from equation (6) assuming the ideal photon envelopes equations (1)–(3),. The magnitude and the dynamics of the observed scattering are well reproduced for τ_{p}=13.3 ns and Λ=0.033 (Fig. 4, solid lines). The observed peak absorption for the exponentially decaying photon is slightly higher than expected. We attribute this discrepancy to the imperfect photon envelopes that differ slightly from the ideal asymmetric exponential.
The interaction with the atom reduces the overall transmission into the forward detection path for both photon shapes. To quantify this behaviour, we calculate the extinction by summing over the interval −14 ns≤t_{i}≤100 ns for exponentially decaying photons, and −100 ns≤t_{i}≤14 ns for exponentially rising photons, capturing almost the entire photon. We obtain similar extinction values and for decaying and rising photons, respectively. The theoretical value of the extinction does not depend on whether the photon envelope is exponentially decaying or rising:
For our parameters, τ_{p}=13.3 ns, Λ=0.033, this expression leads to , which is close to our experimental results.
Timeresolved atomic excitation probability
The excitation probability P_{e}(t_{i}) (Fig. 5, red circles) of the atom is obtained from the differences in the forward detection rates δ(t_{i}) and by numerically integrating equation (7). The exponentially decaying photon induces a longer lasting but lower atomic excitation compared with the rising photon. We find good agreement with the analytical solutions given in equations (3) and (4) (Fig. 5, solid line). We do not observe perfect excitation of the atom from exponentially rising probe photons because of the small spatial mode overlap Λ. However, the peak excited state population for the exponentially rising P_{e,max,↑=}2.77(12)% is 56(11)% larger than for the decaying one P_{e,max,↓=}1.78(9)%. The increase in the peak excitation P_{e,↑,max}/P_{e,↓,max}=78% predicted by equations (3) and (4) for τ_{p}=13.3 ns, Λ=0.033 is also in fair agreement with our findings.
The excited state population can also be directly determined from the atomic fluorescence, equation (5). To convert the coincidence histograms G_{b}(t_{i}) between the heralding detector D_{h} and backward detector D_{b} into the excited state population P_{e}(t_{i}) we have to account for the finite collection and detection efficiencies in the forward and backward path. For the backward path we independently measure the collection efficiency η_{b}=0.0126(5) and the detector quantum efficiency η_{q}=0.56(1). Figure 5 (green filled diamonds) shows the inferred excited state population with a time bin width of 5 ns, where is the heralding efficiency in the forward path, corrected for the collection and detection efficiencies. Again, we find a qualitatively different transient atomic excitation for both photon shapes, in agreement with the theoretical model, but with worse detection statistics compared with the excited state reconstruction using the changes in the forward detection rates. The peak excitation probability and the signal rate can be improved by a larger spatial mode overlap Λ, which is currently limited by the numerical aperture of the focusing lens^{31}. Other focusing geometries like parabolic mirrors can theoretically achieve complete mode matching Λ=1 (ref. 11).
Discussion
In summary, we have accurately measured the atomic excited state population during photon scattering and have demonstrated that the power spectrum of the incident photon is not enough to fully characterize the interaction. The exponentially rising and decaying photons have an identical Lorentzian power spectrum with a fullwidthhalfmaximum , but the transient atomic excitation differs. We have shown that the scattering dynamics depends on the envelope of the photon, in particular that an atom is indeed more efficiently excited by a photon with an exponentially rising temporal envelope compared with an exponentially decaying one. However, when integrated over a long time interval Δt≫τ_{0}, τ_{p} both photon shapes are equally likely to be scattered as shown by our measurement of the extinction The advantage of exciting single atoms with exponentially rising photons is a larger peak excitation probability within a narrower time interval. Such a synchronization can be beneficial to quantum networks.
Our experimental results also contribute to a longstanding discussion about differences between heralded and ‘true’ single photons^{32,33,34,35}. The atomic excitation dynamics caused by heralded single photons matches well the one expected from ‘true’ single photon states in our theoretical model, and therefore support a realistic interpretation of photons prepared in a heralding process.
Methods
Heralded singlephoton generation
The two pump fields have orthogonal linear polarizations. The 795 nm pump laser is reddetuned by −30 MHz from the 5 S_{1/2}, F=2 to 5 P_{1/2}, F=2 transition to avoid incoherent scattering. The frequency of the 762 nm pump laser is set such that the twophoton transition from 5 S_{1/2}, F=2 to 5 D_{3/2}, F=3 is driven with a bluedetuning of 4 MHz. We can vary the coherence time τ_{p} of the generated photons by changing the optical density of the atomic ensemble. We choose τ_{p}=13.3 ns as a tradeoff between matching the excited state lifetime of τ_{0}=26.2 ns and having a high photon pair generation rate. Longer coherence times can be achieved at lower optical densities, but at the cost of lower photon pair generation rates.
The probe photons are guided to the single atom setup by a 230 m long optical fibre. An acoustooptic modulator (AOM) compensates for the 72 MHz shift of the atomic resonance frequency caused by the bias magnetic field (7 Gauss applied along the optical axis) and the dipole trap. The AOM also serves as an optical switch between the two parts of the experimental setup; once a herald photon is detected, the AOM is turned on for 600 ns. The optical and electrical delays are set such that the probe photon passes the AOM within this time interval. Before reaching the atom, the polarization of the probe photons is set to circular σ^{−} by a polarizing beam splitter and a quarterwave plate.
The Fabry–Pérot cavity used to control the temporal envelope has a length of 125 mm and a finesse of 103(5), resulting in a decay time τ_{c}=13.6(5) ns. The reflectance of the incoupling mirror and the second mirror are 0.943 and 0.9995 respectively. We use an auxiliary 780 nm laser to stabilize the cavity length using the Pound–Drever–Hall technique.
Data acquisition and analysis
Figure 3 shows the coincidence histograms without additional processing. For the quantitative analysis (Figs 4 and 5) we subtract the accidental coincidence rate from the histograms. The accidental coincidence rate is caused by background events in the photodetectors, and determined from the histograms by averaging the detected coincidences rate over 300 ns outside the interval used to analyse the scattering dynamics.
The total acquisition time for the experiment was 1,500 h, during which the average photon coherence time was τ_{p}=13.3(1) ns and the heralding efficiency was η_{f}=3.70(1) × 10^{−3}. We check for slow drifts in τ_{p} and η_{f} by analysing the histogram G_{f,0} every 60 min for τ_{p} and 20 min for η_{f}. The distribution of τ_{p} is nearly Gaussian with a s.d. of 0.9 ns, most likely caused by slow drifts of the laser powers and the atomic density; the distribution of η_{f} has a fullwidthhalfmaximum of 6 × 10^{−4}. We alternated between the decaying and rising photon profiles every 20 min to ensure that the recorded coincidence histograms are not systematically biased by slow drifts in τ_{p} and η_{f}.
Temporal photon envelope
The coincidence histograms recorded without atom (Fig. 3 black circles) differ slightly from the ideal asymmetric exponential functions described in equations (1) and (2).
These deviations are well explained by the model we use to describe the effect of the cavity^{20}. For the exponentially decaying photons, the main deviation is a small rising tail, caused by the finite cavity detuning of 70 MHz. For the exponentially rising photons, we observe a small decaying tail due to the bandwidth mismatch between cavity and photon, and cavity losses.
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Additional information
How to cite this article: Leong, V. et al. Timeresolved scattering of a single photon by a single atom. Nat. Commun. 7, 13716 doi: 10.1038/ncomms13716 (2016).
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
Hammerer, K., Sørensen, A. S. & Polzik, E. S. Quantum interface between light and atomic ensembles. Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1041–1093 (2010).
Lukin, M. D. Colloquium: trapping and manipulating photon states in atomic ensembles. Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 457–472 (2003).
Gleyzes, S. et al. Quantum jumps of light recording the birth and death of a photon in a cavity. Nature 446, 297–300 (2007).
Wilk, T., Webster, S. C., Kuhn, A. & Rempe, G. Singleatom singlephoton quantum interface. Science 317, 488–490 (2007).
Stute, A. et al. Tunable ionphoton entanglement in an optical cavity. Nature 485, 482–485 (2012).
Vamivakas, A. N. et al. Strong extinction of a farfield laser beam by a single quantum dot. Nano. Lett. 7, 2892–2896 (2007).
Wrigge, G., Gerhardt, I., Hwang, J., Zumofen, G. & Sandoghdar, V. Efficient coupling of photons to a single molecule and the observation of its resonance fluorescence. Nat. Phys. 4, 60–66 (2008).
Tey, M. K. et al. Strong interaction between light and a single trapped atom without the need for a cavity. Nat. Phys. 4, 924–927 (2008).
Slodička, L., Hétet, G., Gerber, S., Hennrich, M. & Blatt, R. Electromagnetically induced transparency from a single atom in free space. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 153604 (2010).
Streed, E. W., Jechow, A., Norton, B. G. & Kielpinski, D. Absorption imaging of a single atom. Nat. Commun. 3, 933 (2012).
Fischer, M. et al. Efficient saturation of an ion in free space. Appl. Phys. B 117, 797–801 (2014).
Quabis, S., Dorn, R., Eberler, M., Glöckl, O. & Leuchs, G. Focusing light to a tighter spot1. Opt. Commun. 179, 1–7 (2000).
Pinotsi, D. & Imamoğlu, A. Single photon absorption by a single quantum emitter. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 093603 (2008).
Stobińska, M., Alber, G. & Leuchs, G. Perfect excitation of a matter qubit by a single photon in free space. Europhys. Lett. 86, 14007 (2009).
Wang, Y., Minář, J., Sheridan, L. & Scarani, V. Efficient excitation of a twolevel atom by a single photon in a propagating mode. Phys. Rev. A 83, 063842 (2011).
Bader, M., Heugel, S., Chekhov, A. L., Sondermann, M. & Leuchs, G. Efficient coupling to an optical resonator by exploiting timereversal symmetry. New. J. Phys. 15, 123008 (2013).
Heugel, S., Villar, A. S., Sondermann, M., Peschel, U. & Leuchs, G. On the analogy between a single atom and an optical resonator. Laser Phys. 20, 100–106 (2009).
Aljunid, S. A. et al. Excitation of a single atom with exponentially rising light pulses. Phys. Rev. Lett 111, 103001 (2013).
Liu, C. et al. Efficiently loading a single photon into a singlesided fabryperot cavity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 133601 (2014).
Srivathsan, B., Gulati, G. K., Cerè, A., Chng, B. & Kurtsiefer, C. Reversing the temporal envelope of a heralded single photon using a cavity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 163601 (2014).
Weisskopf, V. & Wigner, E. Berechnung der natürlichen linienbreite auf grund der diracschen lichttheorie. Zeitschr. Phys. 63, 54–73 (1930).
Leuchs, G. & Sondermann, M. Timereversal symmetry in optics*. Phys. Scripta 85, 058101 (2012).
Piro, N. et al. Heralded singlephoton absorption by a single atom. Nat. Phys. 7, 17–20 (2010).
Rezus, Y. L. A. et al. Singlephoton spectroscopy of a single molecule. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 093601 (2012).
Brito, J., Kucera, S., Eich, P., Müller, P. & Eschner, J. Doubly heralded singlephoton absorption by a single atom. Appl. Phys. B 122, 1–5 (2016).
Chanelière, T., Matsukevich, D. N. & Jenkins, S. D. Quantum telecommunication based on atomic cascade transitions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 093604 (2006).
Srivathsan, B. et al. Narrow band source of transformlimited photon pairs via fourwave mixing in a cold atomic ensemble. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 123602 (2013).
Franson, J. D. Nonlocal cancellation of dispersion. Phys. Rev. A 45, 3126–3132 (1992).
Gulati, G. K. et al. Generation of an exponentially rising singlephoton field from parametric conversion in atoms. Phys. Rev. A 90, 033819 (2014).
Leong, V. et al. HongOuMandel interference between triggered and heralded single photons from separate atomic systems. Phys. Rev. A 91, 063829 (2015).
Tey, M. K. et al. Interfacing light and single atoms with a lens. New. J. Phys. 11, 043011 (2009).
Lamb, W. E. Antiphoton. Appl. Phys. B 60, 77–84 (1995).
Bartlett, S. D., Rudolph, T. & Spekkens, R. W. Dialogue concerning two views on quantum coherence: Factist and fictionist. Int. J. Quantum Inf. 04, 17–43 (2006).
Franson, J. D. Nonclassical nature of dispersion cancellation and nonlocal interferometry. Phys. Rev. A 80, 032119 (2009).
Bashkansky, M., Vurgaftman, I., Pipino, A. C. R. & Reintjes, J. Significance of heralding in spontaneous parametric downconversion. Phys. Rev. A 90, 053825 (2014).
Acknowledgements
We thank Y. Wang for sharing her numerical simulation code, and B. Chng for helpful discussions. We acknowledge the support of this work by the Ministry of Education in Singapore (AcRF Tier 1) and the National Research Foundation, Prime Minister’s office (partly under grant no NRFCRP12201303). M.S. acknowledges support by the Lee Kuan Yew Postdoctoral Fellowship.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
V.L., M.S.T. worked mostly on the single atom setup, M.S.E., A.C. mostly on the FWM source. V.L., M.S.T., A.C. carried out the data analysis; M.S.T., A.C. and C.K. conceived the experiment and provided basic experimental support. All authors participated in writing the paper.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Leong, V., Seidler, M., Steiner, M. et al. Timeresolved scattering of a single photon by a single atom. Nat Commun 7, 13716 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms13716
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms13716
This article is cited by

Photon bound state dynamics from a single artificial atom
Nature Physics (2023)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.