Table 1 Soil carbon accumulation.

From: Direct evidence for microbial-derived soil organic matter formation and its ecophysiological controls

Months

Substrate added

SOC(mg C per g soil)

  

Kaolinite

Montmorillonite

Field soil

  

Glucose

Cellobiose

DOC

Glucose

Cellobiose

Syringol

DOC

 

6

16.80

5.10Ab

5.33Ab

6.21Bb

4.01Aa

3.91Aa

7.96C

5.55Ba

9.18±0.04*

9

27.30

7.21Ab

6.55Aa

8.54Ba

6.2Aa

6.72Aa

14.36C

8.83Ba

 

12

37.10

8.05Aa

9.21Ba

11.10Ca

7.76Aa

8.86Aa

12.98B

10.73Ba

 

15

46.90

11.08Aa

11.33Aa

12.88Bb

10.43Aa

10.17Aa

14.47C

11.98Ba

 

18

46.90

8.61Aa

8.88Aa

10.45Ba

8.36Aa

7.98Aa

13.11B

11.75Bb

 

Amount lost

 

38.29

38.02

36.45

38.54

38.92

33.79

35.20

 
  

SOC conversion efficiency (mg SOC per g total substrate-C added)

6

16.80

0.30Ab

0.32Ab

0.37Bb

0.24Aa

0.23Aa

0.47C

0.33Ba

0.03–0.33†

9

27.30

0.26Ab

0.24Ba

0.31Ca

0.23Aa

0.29Aa

0.49C

0.32Ba

 

12

37.10

0.22Aa

0.25Ba

0.30Ca

0.21Aa

0.24ABa

0.35B

0.29Ba

 

15

46.90

0.24Aa

0.24Aa

0.27Bb

0.24Aa

0.23Aa

0.47C

0.26Ba

 

18

46.90

0.18Aa

0.19Aa

0.22Ba

0.18Aa

0.10Aa

0.28B

0.25Bb

 

Fraction lost

 

0.82

0.81

0.78

0.82

0.90

0.72

0.75

 
  1. The soil organic carbon (SOC) concentration and conversion efficiency (the proportion of added substrate-C converted to SOC) at 6, 9, 12, 15 and 18 months in soils treated with glucose, cellobiose, syringol or plant leachate DOC. For comparison, field soil results are also presented. Significance among substrates within clay type is indicated by capital letters. Significant pair-wise comparisons among clay types within a substrate group is indicated by lowercase letters (ANOVA: P<0.05) (experimental replication n=5). DOC, dissolved organic C.
  2. *Soybean bulk soils 0–7 cm depth, collected from the W.K. Kellogg Biological Station, Michigan16.
  3. †Data synthesized from 15 field and laboratory incubation experiments7.