The computational repertoire of neurons is enhanced by regenerative electrical signals initiated in dendrites. These events, referred to as dendritic spikes, can act as cell-intrinsic amplifiers of synaptic input. Among these signals, dendritic NMDA spikes are of interest in light of their correlation with synaptic LTP induction. Because it is not possible to block NMDA spikes pharmacologically while maintaining NMDA receptors available to initiate synaptic plasticity, it remains unclear whether NMDA spikes alone can trigger LTP. Here we use dendritic recordings and calcium imaging to analyse the role of NMDA spikes in associative LTP in CA3 pyramidal cells. We show that NMDA spikes produce regenerative branch-specific calcium transients. Decreasing the probability of NMDA spikes reduces LTP, whereas increasing their probability enhances LTP. NMDA spikes and LTP occur without back-propagating action potentials. However, action potentials can facilitate LTP induction by promoting NMDA spikes. Thus, NMDA spikes are necessary and sufficient to produce the critical postsynaptic depolarization required for associative LTP in CA3 pyramidal cells.
The Hebbian postulate, whereby a synapse is strengthened when presynaptic input is successful in evoking postsynaptic activity, is accepted as the basis for many forms of associative learning. This process is initiated by strong depolarization of the postsynaptic neuron, which activates NMDA (N-methyl-D-aspartate) receptors and results in the calcium elevation that triggers the biochemical processes leading to long-term potentiation (LTP). The depolarization produced by a single synaptic input is insufficient to induce LTP; rather, LTP is associative in nature, requiring the summated input from many excitatory synapses. A key aspect of Hebbian plasticity is the requirement of a feedback signal that informs the synapse whether the integrated postsynaptic activity was sufficient to induce an action potential. An attractive candidate for this feedback event is the back-propagating action potential (bAP)1,2. However, a number of observations have called into question the relevance of the bAP for LTP3,4. Importantly, LTP can be induced at various synapses in the absence of bAPs5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13. In these studies, regenerative dendritic events referred to as dendritic spikes (dSpikes) may produce the depolarization needed to trigger LTP. These dSpikes can be local events, often confined to a single dendritic branch14. Theory suggests that such spatially restricted depolarization may have the advantage of allowing memory storage at a much finer scale than the widespread dendritic regions affected by bAPs15. At present, however, the evidence that dSpikes provide the critical depolarization necessary for LTP remains correlative.
Dendritic spiking mechanisms are complex, involving both bAPs as well as dSpikes (dendritic sodium spikes, dendritic calcium spikes and dendritic NMDA spikes14). Although all these events may influence dendritic depolarization, determining which factor is essential for LTP is complicated. We have investigated LTP at recurrent collateral synapses in the CA3 hippocampal region and characterized the underlying roles of bAPs and dSpikes. Using a combination of electrophysiological and two-photon Ca2+ imaging techniques, we identify dendritic NMDA spikes as the causal signal that initiates LTP at synapses between hippocampal CA3 pyramidal cells.
NMDA spikes induce branch-restricted Ca2+ transients and LTP
We evoked NMDA spikes, which are a class of dSpike dependent on NMDA receptor (NMDAR) activation16,17, using a subthreshold input-timing-dependent plasticity (ITDP) protocol. CA3 recurrent (rCA3) axons were stimulated followed 10 ms later by mossy fibre (MF) stimulation (Fig. 1a). In these experiments, action potentials were prevented by intracellular application of QX-314 (500 μM)18. Sixty pairings at 0.1 Hz produced LTP at the stimulated rCA3 synapses (41.9±2.3% after 30 min, n=13 of 16, P<0.001; Fig. 1a), whereas MF EPSPs remained unaffected (Fig. 1b and ref. 9). Scaling membrane potential traces to normalize the amplitude of the evoked rCA3 EPSP preceding MF stimulation revealed a bimodal distribution of summated excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs) corresponding to linear and supralinear responses (Fig. 1c). The supralinear responses exhibited all-or-none properties as a function of stimulation intensity and were blocked by NMDAR antagonists, thus meeting two important criteria for NMDA spikes19 (Supplementary Fig. 1 and Fig. 1d; see ‘Methods’ section for NMDA spike analysis). To facilitate analysis, all experiments were performed with intracellular picrotoxin (1 mM) to suppress GABAA-mediated inhibition. However, ITDP-triggered LTP can also be induced in the absence of picrotoxin9.
We next examined a third criterion for NMDA spikes, the localized elevation of intracellular calcium concentration. Two-photon Ca2+ imaging with Fluo-5F showed that during the pairing protocol Ca2+ transients occurred in the region of the dendritic rCA3 synapses close to the stimulation electrode (Fig. 1e and Supplementary Fig. 2d), consistent with the finding that NMDA spikes are triggered by NMDAR expressed at rCA3 rather than at MF synapses9. Importantly, whenever an evoked dendritic Ca2+ transient was detected, a coincident NMDA spike was likely to be present in the electrophysiological recording (in 93.8±3.5% of cases, n=13; Fig. 1f and Supplementary Fig. 2e). In addition, the integral of all Ca2+ transients detected within the field of view close to the stimulation electrode correlated with the amplitude of the NMDA spike (Supplementary Fig. 3e–g). Dendritic Ca2+ imaging also provided information about the localization and spatial extent of NMDA spikes. Ca2+ transients were restricted to individual branches, spreading only for short distances (width: 11.8±1.2 μm, n=13 cells; Fig. 1e,h and Supplementary Fig. 2h–j). Furthermore, within a branch, there were local hotspots (∼1 μm diameter) that were repeatedly elicited during the pairing protocol, likely reflecting the sites of synaptic input (n=7/7; Fig. 1h,i and Supplementary Fig. 2h–j), as reported previously10,11,19,20,21. Branch-specific Ca2+ transients could be observed in apical (n=7) or basal dendrites (n=9) depending on the position of the stimulation electrode (see ‘Methods’ section for further description). This pattern reflects the location of rCA3 synapses, which can be on either apical or basal dendrites. The location of giant MF synapses is closer to the cell body, but still able to depolarize more distal dendrites22.
Dendritic Ca2+ transients can arise not only in conjunction with NMDA spikes but also with back-propagating APs, dendritic sodium spikes and Ca2+ spikes. Under our experimental conditions, however, the dendritic Ca2+ transients corresponded to NMDA spikes, on the basis of their duration (∼50 ms)23,24, absence of a sodium spikelet23,24 and restricted spatial propagation19,24 (Supplementary Fig. 4). Furthermore, dendritic NMDA spikes were evoked with a lower stimulation threshold than Ca2+ spikes, and were not prevented by pharmacological blockade of sodium and Ca2+ channels9,25,26. Both the NMDA spikes and the corresponding dendritic Ca2+ transients were greatly decreased in number after NMDAR blockade with the competitive antagonist D-AP5 (50 μM) (NMDA spikes: from 44.2±2.7% in control, n=13, to 4.8±1.7%, n=6, P<0.001; Ca2+ transients: from 41.9±2.3%, n=13, to 5.1±2.7%, n=6, P<0.001; Fig. 1d,g and Supplementary Fig. 2f,g). Taken together, the results demonstrate that these supralinear events are chiefly NMDA spikes localized to individual dendritic branches.
Are the NMDA spikes evoked by the ITDP protocol expressed in only one region of the dendritic tree or can multiple areas be implicated? We addressed this question by examining the EPSP/EPSC rise time as a proxy for the distance of the stimulated rCA3 inputs from the soma (Supplementary Fig. 5). In the majority of cells (10/13), the relatively low-intensity stimulation employed (minimal stimulation (60% failures) +20% in all experiments) evoked rCA3 EPSPs with unimodal distributions of rise time, which is consistent with the generation of the EPSP at a specific dendritic distance from the soma, even though a CA3 pyramidal cell typically receives multiple synaptic contacts from a given neighboring cell27. Plotting the rise time of the rCA3 EPSP against the mean distance from the soma of the observed Ca2+ transients yielded a linear relation (Supplementary Fig. 5e). However, in 3/13 experiments, the Ca2+ transients were detected in two distinct areas of the dendritic tree; consistently in these cases, the rise time analysis revealed a bimodal distribution (Supplementary Fig. 6).
A strong indication that NMDA spikes are important for the induction of LTP was obtained by examining the relationship between the probability of evoking dendritic Ca2+ transients characteristic of NMDA spikes and the magnitude of LTP. This revealed a high correlation (r=0.79, n=16; Fig. 1j). In experiments where paired stimulation evoked Ca2+ transients in less than 10% of the 60 trials, rCA3 synapses did not undergo potentiation (1.1±0.1%, n=3, P=0.5; Fig. 1j and Supplementary Fig. 7). Thus, the paired stimulation paradigm per se does not induce potentiation, but rather a critical number (∼10) of NMDA spikes is required. Furthermore, the number of branches exhibiting a dendritic Ca2+ transient during a paired stimulation correlated with the amplitude of the NMDA spike (Fig. 1k).
NMDA spikes provide the postsynaptic depolarization for ITDP
We next sought to address the causal role of NMDA spikes in LTP induction by bidirectionally manipulating the probability of evoking NMDA spikes. In a first set of experiments, we examined whether LTP induction is facilitated by enhancing the activation of extrasynaptic NMDARs, as these play a key role in the generation of NMDA spikes24,25. Using the above-described ITDP pairing protocol with sodium channels blocked by intracellular QX-314, we reduced the stimulation intensity below the threshold to evoke NMDA spikes reliably (in only 5.4±2.0% of pairings, n=8). Repetitive pairing for 60 times with this weak ITDP protocol failed to induce LTP (0.9±0.5%, n=8, P=0.6; Fig. 2a,b). However, after inhibiting glutamate transporters with threo-β-benzyloxyaspartic acid (TBOA), a procedure that promotes glutamate spillover and activation of extrasynaptic NMDARs28, stimulation with the same intensity significantly increased the probability of evoking NMDA spikes (in 46.4±2.6% of pairings, n=8, P<0.001) and their normalized amplitude (from 95.3±13% to 132.9±10.4%, n=8, P<0.01; Fig. 2b,c). Moreover, LTP was now observed at the rCA3 synapses (65.1±4.3%, n=8, P<0.001; Fig. 2a,b).
In the next experiments, we reduced the probability of evoking NMDA spikes by hyperpolarizing the membrane potential and looked at the resulting change in the ability to induce LTP. At ∼−60 mV (−60.5±3.4 mV, n=7), the pairing of rCA3 and MF inputs consistently resulted in NMDA spikes (45.6±2.9% of pairings, n=7, P<0.001), whereas at more hyperpolarized membrane potentials (−74.2±2.3 mV, n=7), NMDA spikes were rarely evoked (in 6.1±1.5% of pairings, n=7; Fig. 2d–h). LTP could not be induced in the experiments with hyperpolarized membrane potential in which NMDA spikes were infrequent (rCA3 EPSP amplitude change: −1.2±0.5%, n=7, P=0.7), while in the same cells at −60 mV, LTP was observed in 7/7 experiments (58.1±2.9%, n=7, P<0.001; Fig. 2g).
NMDA spikes provide the postsynaptic depolarization for STDP
A dendritic event implicated in synaptic plasticity is the bAP1,2. However, it is possible that a bAP by itself has little direct effect on LTP induction and only becomes important if it triggers other dendritic events3. Because all of the above experiments were performed under conditions where action potentials were prevented, it was of interest to examine whether bAPs play a role in triggering NMDA spikes and if so, whether this process is reliable. We therefore paired the rCA3 EPSP with a back-propagating AP instead of a MF EPSP, which corresponds to a classical spike-timing-dependent plasticity (STDP) protocol. Simultaneous recordings were obtained from a second-order apical dendrite and the soma (Supplementary Fig. 8). The stimulating electrode was positioned so as to activate rCA3 fibres that targeted mainly the dendrite recorded from, as indicated by the faster rise time and the greater amplitude of the rCA3 EPSP recorded in the dendrite versus the soma (dendrite: 6.1±0.5 ms, soma: 9.2±0.8 ms, P=0.008; dendrite: 8.2±1.9 mV, soma: 4.9±0.7 mV, n=5, P=0.007; Fig. 3c). When this EPSP was followed after 10 ms by a single AP triggered with somatic current injection, an NMDA spike was never observed (n=5; Fig. 3a,d). The contribution of NMDARs to the responses generated by this single-AP STDP protocol as compared with the ITDP protocol was small but not negligible (13±1.6% versus 102.1±7.9%, n=5, P=0.0001; Fig. 3d). Weak activation of NMDARs as occurs in response to such a single bAP might therefore not be sufficient to produce LTP, as reported in other cell types29,30,31,32. To test this possibility directly, we paired a single bAP with synaptic input over 50 trials at 0.3 Hz. As show in Fig. 3a,e, this protocol did not induce LTP (2.2±2.4%, n=5, P=0.7). Thus, simply activating NMDARs may be insufficient for LTP induction if the generated response is below threshold to evoke an NMDA spike.
Previous studies in other cell types have shown that whereas STDP is difficult to evoke using a single bAP, brief bursts of bAPs can be effective2,31,32. When the rCA3 EPSP was paired after a 10 ms delay with three APs at 200 Hz, an NMDA spike of dendritic origin was evoked with high probability (61.2±9.3%, n=5; Fig. 3a,d). Repetitive pairing with this STDP protocol induced strong LTP (44.9±9.9%, n=5, P=0.0033; Fig. 3a,e). Thus, AP firing has to attain a critical frequency to evoke NMDA spikes and to induce LTP (Supplementary Fig. 9).
To further clarify the role of bAPs in modulating the probability of evoking an NMDA spike, we tested a STDP protocol in which a hyperpolarizing pulse was applied through the dendritic recording electrode during the triggering of the three somatic APs, which prevented NMDA spikes (Fig. 3f,h). Importantly, the injected current did not hyperpolarize the membrane below the threshold for AP generation (Fig. 3f) and did not markedly reduce the ‘non-regenerative’ NMDA component of the response (11.7±2.6%; n=5, P=0.002; Fig. 3h). Again, rCA3 fibres were stimulated that targeted mainly the dendrite recorded from, as indicated by the faster rise time (RT) and the greater amplitude of the rCA3 EPSP recorded in the dendrite versus the soma (dendrite: 5.6±0.6 ms, soma: 8.7±0.7 ms recording, n=5, P=0.0008). With this protocol, LTP was not induced (3.76±3.84%, n=5, P=0.3; Fig. 3f,i), showing that the occurrence of bAPs per se is not sufficient to initiate synaptic plasticity. In the same cell, the omission of the hyperpolarizing pulse recovered NMDA spikes (59.5±7.2%, n=5; Fig. 3h) and repetitive pairing now induced LTP (43.9±2.9%, n=5, P<0.0001; Fig. 3f,i). Taken together, these data show that NMDA spikes are the critical event in both subthreshold and suprathreshold forms of LTP at rCA3 synapses.
The bAPs associated with STDP protocols also activate voltage-gated Ca2+ channels that may trigger dendritic Ca2+ spikes2,33,34. After pharmacological block of Ca2+ currents, however, the supralinear response persisted (Supplementary Fig. 9f,g).
We have presented several lines of evidence for a direct causal role of dendritic NMDA spikes in the induction of LTP at excitatory recurrent synapses onto CA3 pyramidal cells. We were able to evoke dendritic electrical signals definitively identified as NMDA spikes and to show that manipulations that increased the probability of NMDA spikes increased LTP, whereas manipulations that decreased their probability reduced LTP. NMDA spikes were the critical trigger both when LTP was induced with subthreshold events using an ITDP protocol as well as with bAPs using a classical STDP paradigm. Thus, our results also provide new insights into the function of bAPs. According to the text-book description of STDP, such spikes, when timed after the onset of EPSPs, provide the crucial depolarization to initiate LTP. However, for CA3 pyramidal cells, this timing rule is not absolute, depending on the age of the animal35,36. As shown here and previously9, at synapses between CA3 pyramidal cells, LTP can be induced in the absence of bAPs. Nevertheless, bAPs, which can be boosted during concurrent synaptic input37, may have an indirect role in inducing synaptic plasticity. In our study, brief bursts of bAPs evoked NMDA spikes, which in turn induced LTP. Thus, the NMDA spike rather than the bAP is the final effector of LTP at the CA3 synapses we have studied. Determining the postsynaptic depolarization necessary for LTP in rCA3 synapses is of particular significance because both theoretical and experimental work point to the critical role of this brain region in autoassociative memory38,39,40.
Our findings raise the question whether NMDA spike-mediated subthreshold LTP induction represents a special property of recurrent synapses in the CA3 area or whether NMDA spikes may also be involved at other synapses. Previous work in diverse brain areas has shown that dendritic spikes generate the supralinear signal triggering plasticity at synapses where LTP can occur independently of bAPs5,6,11,12,13. Specifically for NMDAR-dependent dendritic spikes, in vivo investigations have provided correlative evidence for their role in synaptic plasticity in CA1 pyramidal cells41, in motor cortex10 and in barrel cortex11. Although these studies did not rigorously establish the unique role of NMDA spikes as in our experiments, they are consistent with our conclusion that dSpikes rather than bAPs provide the critical depolarization for LTP. Thus, NMDA spikes appear to be important for LTP at synapses in diverse brain regions, but other synapses have been shown to depend on other types of supralinear signalling8,12,13,14. It should be noted that in our preparation a single bAP almost never triggered an NMDA spike and did not induce LTP. However, it is possible that single spikes may be able to more powerfully affect NMDA spikes or other dendritic processes in vivo42, where background neuronal activity and neuromodulatory conditions are different43.
Our data indicate that on the order of 10 NMDA spikes (∼20% of the responses during the 60-trial protocol lasting 6 min) are sufficient to induce LTP, which is in the same range as the number of bursts that a hippocampal pyramidal cell fires as an animal traverses the cell’s place field44. Significant LTP may thus be induced by a single experience. In this respect, it is of interest that the long-term representation of space by CA1 hippocampal place cells in navigating mice depends directly on the prevalence of dendritic branch spikes41,45. Our data provide further support for the concept of the dendritic branch rather than the dendritic spine as the functional unit for LTP induction46,47,48. NMDA spikes in CA3 pyramidal cells are generated when ∼15 synapses are activated synchronously on a dendritic segment20,49, which is a relatively small number considering that 15 synapses represents <5% of the synapses present in a dendritic segment20. This observation is consistent with the compartmentalization of correlated inputs onto single dendritic segments during hippocampal development50,51,52. Such clustered input may be a prerequisite for the generation of spatially restricted NMDA spikes and their critical role in LTP induction.
Preparation of acute hippocampal slices
Acute slices were prepared from 3-week-old Wistar rats following a protocol approved by the Veterinary Department of the Canton of Zurich. (approval ID 81–2014). Rats were decapitated and brains quickly removed in an ice-cold artificial cerebrospinal fluid (ACSF) solution containing the following (in mM): 125 NaCl, 2.5 KCl, 1.25 NaH2PO4, 25 NaCHCO3, 1 MgCl2, 2 CaCl2, 10 glucose (pH 7.4) and equilibrated with 95% O2 and 5% CO2. Three hundred micrometre thick transverse acute slices were prepared with a vibratome (HM 650 V, Microm International) in ice-cold artificial cerebrospinal fluid. Sections were incubated in ASCF for 20 min at 34 °C and then kept at room temperature for at least 1 h before recording. Experiments with acute slices are depicted in Supplementary Fig. 10.
Preparation of hippocampal slice cultures
All other experiments were performed in slice cultures, which form a quasi-monolayer that facilitates dendritic imaging. Slice cultures were prepared from 6-day-old Wistar rats according to the Gähwiler method53. Transverse slices were prepared (400 μm) and fixed to coverslips with clotted chicken plasma. These were placed in sealed test tubes with serum-containing medium and maintained in a moving incubator at 36 °C for 21–28 days.
Hippocampal slice cultures or acute slices were mounted in a recording chamber positioned on an upright microscope (Zeiss Axioskop FS1) or, for combined imaging, a Scientifica microscope. Slices or slice cultures were superfused with an external solution (pH 7.4) containing (in mM): 137 NaCl, 2.7 KCl, 11.6 NaHCO3, 0.4 NaH2PO4, 2 CaCl2, 2 MgCl2, 5.6 D-glucose and 0.001% phenol red to monitor pH for slice cultures and 125 NaCl, 2.5 KCl, 1.25 NaH2PO4, 25 NaCHCO3, 2 CaCl2, 2 MgCl2, 10 glucose (pH 7.4) and equilibrated with 95% O2 and 5% CO2 for acute slices. All experiments were performed at 34 °C. Patch pipettes had a resistance between 5 and 7 MΩ for somatic whole-cell recordings of CA3 pyramidal cells and between 9 and 11 MΩ for recordings from second-order dendrites. Both somatic and dendritic patch pipettes were filled with (in mM): 135 K-gluconate, 5 KCl, 10 Hepes, 5 phosphocreatine, 2 MgATP, 0.4 NaGTP and 0.07 CaCl2 (pH 7.2). In experiments in which imaging was performed, Fluo-5F (100 μM) and Alexa 495 (10 μM) were added to the solution. Resting membrane potential of the hippocampal CA3 pyramidal cells was −64.1±2.9 mV, n=53. Voltage commands were corrected for the liquid junction potential (8.3 mV). No differences were apparent in the properties of NMDA spikes recorded in slice cultures and in acute slices (Supplementary Fig. 10).
For the determination of current–voltage relationships, command potentials had a duration of 1 s to ensure steady-state responses. Data were recorded with Axopatch 200B amplifiers (Molecular Devices), digitized at 4 kHz for current-clamp and 5 kHz for voltage-clamp, and analysed off line with pCLAMP 10 (MolecularDevices) and Origin (OriginLab). In all experiments, inhibitory postsynaptic potentials were reduced in the recorded CA3 pyramidal cells by adding picrotoxin (1 mM) (Sigma-Aldrich) to the patch solution. Series resistance (typically 8.5–14.5 MΩ for somatic recordings and 15–35 MΩ for dendritic recordings) was monitored regularly, and cells were excluded if a change of >20% occurred during the recording. For experiments involving extracellular stimulation, the electrode placement, the paired pulse ratio, the response latency and the sensitivity of transmission to DCG-IV were assessed to differentiate between responses mediated by MFs versus rCA3 fibres (Supplementary Fig. 11).
CA3 pyramidal cells receive excitatory input in a spatially segregated manner:
MFs, the axons of the dentate granule cells, contact the emerging trunk of the apical and basal dendritic tree22.
rCA3s, the axons of neighbouring CA3 pyramidal cells, target the intermediate region of the apical and basal dendritic tree54.
Perforant path axons, originating in the entorhinal cortex, contact the distal portion of the apical dendritic tree54.
Consistent with this innervation pattern, our experiments show that Ca2+ transients associated with NMDA spikes occur both in the apical and basal dendritic tree. Dendritic Ca2+ transients were evoked mainly in the apical dendritic tree when the rCA3 stimulating electrode was placed in the stratum radiatum of CA3 and the MF electrode in the dentate gyrus. Dendritic Ca2+ transients were evoked mainly in the basal dendritic tree when the rCA3 stimulating electrode was placed in the stratum oriens of CA3 and the MF electrode in the dentate gyrus. The identity of the stimulated fibre tracts was ascertained using standard criteria (Supplementary Fig. 11).
NMDA spike analysis
Supralinear responses, which correspond to NMDA spikes, were revealed by normalizing the amplitude of the evoked rCA3 EPSP preceding MF stimulation (for example, Fig. 1c). All 60 paired responses were scaled to the amplitude of the rCA3 EPSP revealing a bimodal distribution.
The probability of evoking an NMDA spike, pNMDAsp, was calculated as follows:
The amplitude of an NMDA spike, ANMDAsp, was expressed as the percentage increase compared with the amplitude of the mean linear response, Ālinear (peak of the first Gaussian, for example, Fig. 1c):
Two-photon Ca2+ imaging
CA3 pyramidal neurons were loaded with Fluo-5F (100 μM) and Alexa Fluor 495 (10 μM; Molecular Probes) through the recording pipette for at least 20 min before two-photon imaging. Neurons were imaged using a two-photon microscope (Scientifica) equipped with a Ti:sapphire laser (Tsunami, Spectra Physics) tuned to 840 nm and a 40 × water-immersion objective lens (0.8 NA, Olympus). Laser power under the objective was typically between 10 and 15 mW. Fluorescence was detected using two photomultiplier tubes using 525/50 nm (green channel) and 620/60 nm (red channel) emission filters. Scanning and image acquisition were controlled by HelioScan software55. Time series of Fluo-5F fluorescence images were acquired at 10 Hz with 100 × 100 pixel resolution across imaging fields encompassing neuronal dendrites. The dimensions of a field of view (FOV) were 30 × 30 μm.
For the imaging experiments, the ITDP protocol consisted of 60 pairings. As it was of interest to compare responses between different FOVs, images were obtained sequentially from each FOV resulting in data sets consisting of 30 responses when 2 FOVs were selected or 20 responses when 3 FOVs were selected. Simultaneous data acquisition from more than 1 FOV would have resulted in images with insufficient resolution for detailed analysis. In this respect, it should be noted that we previously found no change in the probability of evoking an NMDA spike over the time course of the 60 pairings (Supplementary Fig. 4 in Brandalise and Gerber, 2014).
At the end of each experiment, a z-stack of the fluorescently labelled CA3 pyramidal cell was acquired. Dye which inadvertently leaked from the recording pipette was sometimes taken up by surrounding glia cells. Data were analysed with NIH ImageJ and Igor Pro (WaveMetrics) software. In ImageJ, dendritic segments were manually selected as regions of interest (ROIs). Ca2+ signals were expressed as ΔF/F=(F−F0)/F0 where F and baseline F0 represent mean fluorescence values in an ROI. A Ca2+ transient was accepted as a signal when its amplitude was greater than two times the s.d. of the noise. The onset of the evoked Ca2+ transients was defined by the timing of the electrical stimulation (0.1 Hz). Ca2+ transient integrals for ROIs were calculated in MATLAB as temporal integrals over a 2 s post-stimulus time window (units of ‘%s’; after subtraction of the mean ΔF/F in a 1 s pre-stimulus baseline window). Collapsed z-stack overview images were used to measure the distance from dendritic branches to the recording electrode in the soma. For the analysis of the frequency of Ca2+ transients associated with NMDA spikes, as well as their amplitudes and integrals, ROIs were selected such that they enclosed an entire dendritic segment, hence the area covered by ROIs was variable (Fig. 1 and Supplementary Figs 2–5 and 7). For detailed analysis of the spatial extent of the Ca2+ transients, a series of uniformly sized ROIs (∼1 × 1 μm) were positioned along dendrites exhibiting responses as identified by heat maps (Fig. 1h,i and Supplementary Fig. 2h–j).
All data are expressed as the mean±s.e.m. No data sets were excluded from analysis. Statistical analyses were performed using Origin 2016 (OriginLab) applying Student’s paired or unpaired t-test. Before applying the Student t-test, a QQ plot was generated and the Shapiro-Wilk test was performed for each pool of data to confirm a normal distribution. Linear correlations were evaluated with the Pearson coefficient. The size of the data sets was determined based on past experience with experiments involving in vitro recordings in brain slices. For the main experiments n=7–15, and for control experiments n=5–10.
The authors declare that the experimental results supporting the findings are included in the article and the Supplementary Information and are available upon reasonable request.
How to cite this article: Brandalise, F. et al. Dendritic NMDA spikes are necessary for timing-dependent associative LTP in CA3 pyramidal cells. Nat. Commun. 7, 13480 doi: 10.1038/ncomms13480 (2016).
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Stuart, G. J. & Sakmann, B. Active propagation of somatic action potentials into neocortical pyramidal cell dendrites. Nature 367, 69–72 (1994).
Magee, J. C. & Johnston, D. A synaptically controlled, associative signal for Hebbian plasticity in hippocampal neurons. Science 275, 209–213 (1997).
Lisman, J. & Spruston, N. Postsynaptic depolarization requirements for LTP and LTD: a critique of spike timing-dependent plasticity. Nat. Neurosci. 8, 839–841 (2005).
Lisman, J. & Spruston, N. Questions about STDP as a general model of synaptic plasticity. Front. Synaptic Neurosci. 2, 140 (2010).
Golding, N. L. & Spruston, N. Dendritic sodium spikes are variable triggers of axonal action potentials in hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons. Neuron 21, 1189–1200 (1998).
Golding, N. L., Staff, N. P. & Spruston, N. Dendritic spikes as a mechanism for cooperative long-term potentiation. Nature 418, 326–331 (2002).
Sjöström, P. J., Turrigiano, G. G. & Nelson, S. B. Multiple forms of long-term plasticity at unitary neocortical layer 5 synapses. J. Neurophysiol. 52, 176–184 (2007).
Dudman, J. T., Tsay, D. & Siegelbaum, S. A. A role for synaptic inputs at distal dendrites: instructive signals for hippocampal long-term plasticity. Neuron 56, 866–879 (2007).
Brandalise, F. & Gerber, U. Mossy fiber-evoked subthreshold responses induce timing-dependent plasticity at hippocampal CA3 recurrent synapses. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 4303–4308 (2014).
Cichon, J. & Gan, W. B. Branch-specific dendritic Ca2+ spikes cause persistent synaptic plasticity. Nature 520, 180–185 (2015).
Gambino, F. et al. Sensory-evoked LTP driven by dendritic plateau potentials in vivo. Nature 515, 116–119 (2014).
Kim, Y., Hsu, C. L., Cembrowski, M. S., Mensh, B. D. & Spruston, N. Dendritic sodium spikes are required for long-term potentiation at distal synapses on hippocampal pyramidal neurons. eLife 4, e06414 (2015).
Basu, J. et al. Gating of hippocampal activity, plasticity, and memory by entorhinal cortex long-range inhibition. Science 351, aaa5694 (2016).
Stuart, G. J. & Spruston, N. Dendritic integration: 60 years of progress. Nat. Neurosci. 18, 1713–1721 (2015).
Poirazi, P., Brannon, T. & Mel, B. W. Pyramidal neuron as two-layer neural network. Neuron 37, 989–999 (2003).
Schiller, J., Schiller, Y., Stuart, G. & Sakmann, B. Calcium action potentials restricted to distal apical dendrites of rat neocortical pyramidal neurons. J. Physiol. 505, 605–616 (1997).
Schiller, J., Major, G., Koester, H. J. & Schiller, Y. NMDA spikes in basal dendrites of cortical pyramidal neurons. Nature 404, 285–289 (2000).
Connors, B. W. & Prince, D. A. Effects of local anesthetic QX-314 on the membrane properties of hippocampal pyramidal neurons. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 220, 476–481 (1982).
Major, G., Larkum, M. E. & Schiller, J. Active properties of neocortical pyramidal neuron dendrites. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 36, 1–24 (2013).
Magee, J. C. et al. Subthreshold synaptic activation of voltage-gated Ca2+ channels mediates a localized Ca2+ influx into the dendrites of hippocampal pyramidal neurons. J. Neurophysiol. 74, 1335–1342 (1995).
Wilson, D. E., Whitney, D. E., Scholl, B. & Fitzpatrick, D. Orientation selectivity and the functional clustering of synaptic inputs in primary visual cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 19, 1003–1009 (2016).
Schwegler, H., Lipp, H. P., Van der Loos, H. & Buselmaier, W. Individual hippocampal mossy fiber distribution in mice correlates with two-way avoidance performance. Science 214, 817–819 (1981).
Antic, S. D., Zhou, W. L., Moore, A. R., Short, S. M. & Ikonomu, K. D. The decade of the dendritic NMDA spike. J. Neurosci. Res. 88, 2991–3001 (2010).
Oikonomou, K. D., Short, S. M., Rich, M. T. & Antic, S. D. Extrasynaptic glutamate receptor activation as cellular bases for dynamic range compression in pyramidal neurons. Front. Physiol. 3, 334 (2012).
Chalifoux, J. R. & Carter, A. G. Glutamate spillover promotes the generation of NMDA spikes. J. Neurosci. 31, 16435–16446 (2011).
Palmer, L. M. et al. NMDA spikes enhance action potential generation during sensory input. Nat. Neurosci. 17, 383–390 (2014).
Mitra, A., Mitra, S. S. & Tsien, R. W. Heterogeneous reallocation of presynaptic efficacy in recurrent excitatory circuits adapting to inactivity. Nat. Neurosci. 15, 250–257 (2011).
Arnth-Jensen, N., Jabaudon, D. & Scanziani, M. Cooperation between independent hippocampal synapses is controlled by glutamate uptake. Nat. Neurosci. 5, 325–331 (2002).
Markram, H., Lübke, J., Frotscher, M. & Sakmann, B. Regulation of synaptic efficacy by coincidence of postsynaptic APs and EPSPs. Science 275, 213–215 (1997).
Pike, F. G., Meredith, R. M., Olding, A. W. & Paulsen, O. Postsynaptic bursting is essential for ‘Hebbian’ induction of associative long‐term potentiation at excitatory synapses in rat hippocampus. J. Physiol. 518, 571–576 (1999).
Sjöström, P. J., Turrigiano, G. G. & Nelson, S. B. Rate, timing, and cooperativity jointly determine cortical synaptic plasticity. Neuron 32, 1149–1164 (2001).
Kampa, B. M., Letzkus, J. J. & Stuart, G. J. Requirement of dendritic calcium spikes for induction of spike‐timing‐dependent synaptic plasticity. J. Physiol. 574, 283–290 (2006).
Yasuda, R., Sabatini, B. L. & Svoboda, K. Plasticity of calcium channels in dendritic spines. Nat. Neurosci. 6, 948–955 (2003).
Grienberger, C., Chen, X. & Konnerth, A. NMDA receptor-dependent multidendrite Ca2+ spikes required for hippocampal burst firing in vivo. Neuron 81, 1274–1281 (2014).
Debanne, D., Gähwiler, B. H. & Thompson, S. M. Long-term synaptic plasticity between pairs of individual CA3 pyramidal cells in rat hippocampal slice cultures. J. Physiol. 507, 237–247 (1998).
Mishra, R. K., Kim, S., Guzman, S. J. & Jonas, P. Symmetric spike timing-dependent plasticity at CA3-CA3 synapses optimizes storage and recall in autoassociative networks. Nat. Commun. 7, 11552 (2016).
Waters, J. & Helmchen, F. Boosting of action potential backpropagation by neocortical network activity in vivo. J. Neurosci. 24, 11127–11136 (2004).
McNaughton, B. L. & Morris, R. G. Hippocampal synaptic enhancement and information storage within a distributed memory system. Trends Neurosci. 10, 408–415 (1987).
Lisman, J. E. Relating hippocampal circuitry to function: recall of memory sequences by reciprocal dentate–CA3 interactions. Neuron 22, 233–242 (1999).
Kesner, R. P. Behavioral functions of the CA3 subregion of the hippocampus. Learn. Mem. 14, 771–781 (2007).
Sheffield, M. E. & Dombeck, D. A. Calcium transient prevalence across the dendritic arbour predicts place field properties. Nature 517, 200–204 (2015).
Pawlak, V., Greenberg, D. S., Sprekeler, H., Gerstner, W. & Kerr, J. N. Changing the responses of cortical neurons from sub-to suprathreshold using single spikes in vivo. Elife 2, e00012 (2013).
Shulz, D. E. & Jacob, V. Spike-timing-dependent plasticity in the intact brain: counteracting spurious spike coincidences. Front. Synaptic Neurosci. 2, 137 (2010).
McNaughton, B. L., Barnes, C. A. & O’Keefe, J. The contributions of position, direction, and velocity to single unit activity in the hippocampus of freely-moving rats. Exp. Brain Res. 52, 41–49 (1983).
Bittner, K. C. et al. Conjunctive input processing drives feature selectivity in hippocampal CA1 neurons. Nat. Neurosci. 18, 1133–1142 (2015).
Polsky, A., Mel, B. W. & Schiller, J. Computational subunits in thin dendrites of pyramidal cells. Nat. Neurosci. 7, 621–627 (2004).
Losonczy, A., Makara, J. K. & Magee, J. C. Compartmentalized dendritic plasticity and input feature storage in neurons. Nature 452, 436–441 (2008).
Govindarajan, A., Israely, I., Huang, S. Y. & Tonegawa, S. The dendritic branch is the preferred integrative unit for protein synthesis-dependent LTP. Neuron 69, 132–146 (2011).
Makara, J. K. & Magee, J. C. Variable dendritic integration in hippocampal CA3 pyramidal neurons. Neuron 80, 1438–1450 (2013).
Kleindienst, T., Winnubst, J., Roth-Alpermann, C., Bonhoeffer, T. & Lohmann, C. Activity-dependent clustering of functional synaptic inputs on developing hippocampal dendrites. Neuron 72, 1012–1024 (2011).
Takahashi, N. et al. Locally synchronized synaptic inputs. Science 335, 353–356 (2012).
Lee, K. F., Soares, C., Thivierge, J. P. & Béïque, J. C. Correlated synaptic inputs drive dendritic calcium amplification and cooperative plasticity during clustered synapse development. Neuron 89, 784–799 (2016).
Gähwiler, B. H. Organotypic monolayer cultures of nervous tissue. J. Neurosci. Meth. 4, 329–342 (1981).
Amaral, D. G. & Witter, M. P. The three-dimensional organization of the hippocampal formation: a review of anatomical data. Neuroscience 31, 571–591 (1989).
Langer, D. et al. HelioScan: a software framework for controlling in vivo microscopy setups with high hardware flexibility, functional diversity and extendibility. J. Neurosci. Meth. 215, 38–52 (2013).
We appreciate the technical assistance of D. Göckeritz-Dujmovic, S. Giger, H. Kasper, F. David and P. Morciano. We thank B. Gähwiler, M. Santello and F. Loup for valuable discussions and comments on the manuscript and S. Soldado Magraner for writing MATLAB routines. This work was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (grant: 31003A_162558) to U.G. and the NIH (grant: U01NS0905583) to J.L.
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
About this article
Cite this article
Brandalise, F., Carta, S., Helmchen, F. et al. Dendritic NMDA spikes are necessary for timing-dependent associative LTP in CA3 pyramidal cells. Nat Commun 7, 13480 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms13480
This article is cited by
Neurochemical Research (2023)
Scientific Reports (2022)
A calcium-based plasticity model for predicting long-term potentiation and depression in the neocortex
Nature Communications (2022)
Scientific Reports (2018)
Memory formation depends on both synapse-specific modifications of synaptic strength and cell-specific increases in excitability
Nature Neuroscience (2018)