Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Even–odd layer-dependent magnetotransport of high-mobility Q-valley electrons in transition metal disulfides


In few-layer transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDCs), the conduction bands along the ΓK directions shift downward energetically in the presence of interlayer interactions, forming six Q valleys related by threefold rotational symmetry and time reversal symmetry. In even layers, the extra inversion symmetry requires all states to be Kramers degenerate; whereas in odd layers, the intrinsic inversion asymmetry dictates the Q valleys to be spin-valley coupled. Here we report the transport characterization of prominent Shubnikov-de Hass (SdH) oscillations and the observation of the onset of quantum Hall plateaus for the Q-valley electrons in few-layer TMDCs. Universally in the SdH oscillations, we observe a valley Zeeman effect in all odd-layer TMDC devices and a spin Zeeman effect in all even-layer TMDC devices, which provide a crucial information for understanding the unique properties of multi-valley band structures of few-layer TMDCs.


Strong spin–orbit couplings in monolayer transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDC)1,2,3,4 entangle the spin and valley degrees of freedom of the valence band states at K valleys5,6. This gives rise to exciting electronic and excitonic properties, such as optical circular dichroism7,8,9,10, opto-valley Hall effect11,12 and optical valley Zeeman effect13,14,15,16,17,18. Inversion symmetry breaking in monolayer TMDCs plays an important role in opening energy gaps at the energy range of visible lights at K valleys7,8,9,10. Together with the substantial spin–orbital couplings, the broken inversion symmetry in monolayer TMDCs further splits the spin-up and spin-down bands at the valence band edge of K valleys, which is absent in any bilayer TMDC10,19. The former feature leads to the optical circular dichroism and valley Hall effect, the latter feature yields the observation of optical valley Zeeman effect. So far, the observed moderate electron mobility in most atomically thin TMDCs has prohibited the exploration of the quantum transport properties. Impurity scattering and non-ohmic contacts are two major obstacles to fabricating high-mobility TMDC-based field-effect (FE) devices. Several attempts have been made recently in improving the electrical contacts by, for example, using phase engineering20, graphene on MoS2 (ref. 21), Pt electrodes22 or selective etching process23.

Here we present a magnetotransport study of both even- and odd-layer TMDCs with hexagonal boron nitride (BN) encapsulated structures and metal contacts made by the selective etching process. As we will show, the peculiar electronic properties can be extended from monolayer TMDCs to few-layer TMDCs, from K valleys to Q valleys24, and from optical probe to transport detection. This possibility can be explicitly appreciated by comparing the quantum transport measurements in odd-layer and even-layer TMDCs, in which the essential inversion symmetry is broken and respected, respectively. The unique transport properties observed in BN-encapsulated TMDC devices provide useful information for a better understanding of the thickness dependent magnetotransport of high-mobility Q-valley electrons and the spin-valley entangled unconventional quantum Hall (QH) effects in atomically thin TMDCs.


High-mobility TMDC devices

As discussed in our previous work23, to eliminate any impurity effects induced during device fabrication, we employ a polymer-free dry transfer technique25,26 in an inert environment of argon or nitrogen, as schematically demonstrated in Fig. 1a–d. Using the encapsulation of few-layer TMDCs in BN sheets and the selective etching process, we can achieve high-quality low-temperature ohmic contacts (0.15–0.5 kΩ·μm) and ultrahigh FE mobilities (10,500–19,600 cm2 V−1 s−1) in TMDC channels. For example, Fig. 1e,f show the ISDVSD curve of a nine-layer (9L) MoS2 device, where VSD is the voltage source and ISD is the measured current. The linear characteristic of this device is observed at both 300 and 2 K. The contact resistivity at T=2 K is 0.25 kΩ·μm (see details in Supplementary Fig. 1a–c for another 6L WS2 device).

Figure 1: BN-TMDC-BN heterostructure device.

(a) The sandwiched TMDC heterostructure. (b) The BN-TMDC-BN heterostructure for selective etching. The etching window is marked by arrows. (c,d) Optical (c) and schematic image (d) of a BN-TMDC-BN FE transistor device with a Hall bar configuration. Scale bar, 10 μm. (e,f) Two-terminal ISDVSD characteristics of a representative MoS2 device at 300 K (e) and 2 K (f). Linear IV behaviour is observed in both cases. (g) Four-terminal conductance in the WS2 device plotted as a function of the gate voltage at various temperatures. (h,i) FE mobilities and Hall mobilities of MoS2 (h) and WS2 (i) at Vg=60 V at various temperatures.

The high quality of our BN-TMDC-BN heterostructures is reflected by their four-terminal FE mobilities , measured at different temperatures, where σ is the conductivity and Cg is the gate capacitance (1.1–1.2 F cm−2, as calculated based on the thickness of SiO2 (300 nm) and the bottom BN layer (15–50 nm)). The FE characteristics of 9L MoS2 (Fig. 1g) and 6L WS2 (Supplementary Fig. 1d) are shown, whose FE mobilities at room temperature are 50 cm2 V−1s−1 and 300 cm2 V−1 s−1, respectively. At T=2 K, our TMDC devices show excellent performance with remarkably improved FE mobilities (μF10,500 cm2 V−1 s−1 for 9L MoS2 (Fig. 1h) and μF16,000 cm2 V−1 s−1 for 6L WS2 (Fig. 1i)). The phonon scattering is suppressed, and the corresponding Hall mobilities () reach 6,700 and 8,000 cm2 V−1 s−1, where nH is the carrier density obtained from the Hall measurement and σ is the conductivity. The FE mobility in our 6L WS2 device (16,000 cm2 V−1 s−1) is more than 30 times higher than the previously reported record for WS2 (486 cm2 V−1 s−1) (ref. 27). It must be noted that the screening effect may affect the back gating effect and produce inhomogeneous charge density across the layers28. This can give an inaccurate Cg and hence explain the difference between our Hall and FE mobilities.

Quantum oscillations in odd-layer TMDCs

In the representative 9L MoS2 device, the Shubnikov-de Hass (SdH) oscillations in the longitudinal resistance R appear at perpendicular magnetic fields B>4 T (Fig. 2a). This property is the hallmark of the high quality and homogeneity of our BN-MoS2-BN devices. Pronounced SdH oscillations are observed at relatively high gate voltages, where μH is sufficiently high. Quantitatively, at the low magnetic field range, the SdH oscillations in the longitudinal resistance R of a single sub-band in two-dimensional electron gas can be described by the Lifshitz–Kosevich formula29:

Figure 2: Quantum oscillations in odd-layer TMDCs.

(a d) Quantum oscillations in 9L MoS2. (a) Resistance R as a function of B field at + 40 V (orange line), +60 V (blue line) and +70 V (black line) gate voltages. The inset shows the sample image. (b) After subtracting the baselines of R B curves in a, ΔR curves plotted as a function of 1/B yields an oscillation period 1/BF, which decreases with increasing gate voltages. The filling factors are labelled for the oscillations valleys. The degeneracy of 6 arises from the degeneracy between the 3 Q and 3 Q’ valleys; the spin degeneracy within each Q or Q’ valley is already lifted by the broken inversion symmetry. At relatively high magnetic fields, an LL sextet can be lifted into two LL triplets caused by the valley Zeeman effect. (c) The total carrier density n obtained from the Hall measurements as a function of BF/Φ0 (black dots) for different gate voltages. The best fit (red line) indicates a LL degeneracy of 3.0±0.1. (d) LL filling factors as a function of 1/B at different gate voltages. The linear fit yields a zero berry phase. (e,f) Quantum oscillations in 3L WS2. (e) R plotted as a function of B at the carrier density of 7.5 × 1012 cm−2 (f) ΔR curves plotted as a function of 1/B. The LL degeneracy evolves from 6 at low-B fields to 3 at high-B fields. (g) The onset of QH states in 3L MoS2. Magnetoresistance resistance R (blue line) and Hall resistance Rxy (orange line) as a function of B field at 2 K. The QH states are shown by at least three almost quantized plateaus in Rxy at ν=36, 39 and 42.

where λ=2π2kBT/ωc. The cyclotron frequency is given by ωc=eB/m*. τq is the quantum scattering time and the Fermi energy is described by EF=2π2n/gvgsm*. kB is the Boltzmann’s constant, T the temperature, the plank constant, e the electron charge, B the magnetic field, m* the cyclotron mass of carriers, n the charge carrier density, gv the valley degeneracy and gs the spin degeneracy. In a two-dimensional electron gas, the SdH oscillations can display useful information about the quantization of Landau levels (LLs) when plotted versus 1/B. Figure 2b shows the plots of ΔR (that is, the background has been subtracted from R) as a function of 1/B at different gate voltages Vg. The equal spacing between SdH valley positions implies the single-band nature at the studied Vg. Thus, extracting further information using the Lifshitz–Kosevich formula is appropriate. In principle, the periodicity of SdH oscillations is 1/BF=g0n, where g=gs × gv is the LL degeneracy and Φ0=h/e is the flux quantum. At relatively high fields, the best fit of n versus BF0 (Fig. 2c) yields g=3.0±0.1; the linear fit of the LL filling factors versus the SdH valley positions (Fig. 2d) yields a zero Berry phase (the fitting results are in the range of 0.03±0.05 π). As Fig. 2b shows, the filling factors ν=36, 42 and 48 are also clearly observed at relatively low fields with a gate voltage Vg=40 V. The degeneracy of 6 arises from the degeneracy between the 3 Q and 3 Q’ valleys because the spin degeneracy within each Q or Q’ valley is already lifted by the broken inversion symmetry in an odd-layer TMDC. At relatively high magnetic fields, an LL sextet can be lifted into two LL triplets caused by the valley Zeeman effect, which is similar to the K/K’ valley Zeeman effects observed most recently using optical circular dichroism13,14,15,16. The Lande factor gL can be roughly estimated using the formula gLμBBc=kBTC, where μB is the Bohr magneton, and BC is the lowest field and TC is the highest temperature for our observation of the valley Zeeman effect30,31. With a filling factor of 33 at Vg=40 V, the valley Zeeman splitting disappears at 10 K (see Supplementary Fig. 2a) amounting to gL3.4, which is comparable to those reported for WSe2 and MoSe2 monolayers. At relatively high gate voltages (60 and 70 V), where the Hall mobility is sufficiently high, the Zeeman effect takes place at a small strength of B field. The LL triplets start to appear where the SdH oscillations emerge.

The cyclotron mass of charge carriers in the 9L MoS2 device is obtained by investigating the temperature dependence of ΔR oscillations (see Supplementary Fig. 2a). For a given EF (Vg=60 V or n=4.32 × 1012 cm−2) and a given B, the ΔR peak amplitudes (see Supplementary Fig. 2b) follow the Ando formula32 . We obtain m*≈0.27±.01me, which is smaller than the effective mass (0.5me) obtained by our density functional theory (DFT) calculations. Depending on the thickness of odd-layer samples, the measured m* can vary from 0.3 to 0.4me partially due to the uncertainty of the measured temperature. The corresponding quantum scattering time is τq=206 fs, which is much shorter than the transport scattering time τt=(m*)/(R0e2n)=1,100 fs, thereby demonstrating that long-range scattering is dominant in our MoS2 sample (see Supplementary Fig. 3).

As expected, the valley Zeeman effect can also be observed in a 3L WS2 sample (Fig. 2e,f). After subtracting the background of the data shown in Fig. 2e, we plot ΔR as a function of B (Fig. 2f). At high-B fields, the LLs developed from sextets to triplets, with increasing amplitudes of SdH oscillations. Remarkably, the ultrahigh mobility achieved in these TMDC samples even enables us to observe the onset of the QH effect. Figure 2g shows the longitudinal resistance R and Hall resistance Rxy as a function of B at 2 K in a 3L MoS2 device. Beyond 6 T, Rxy exhibits at least three well-quantized plateaus (ν=36, 39 and 42), and they match very well with the corresponding R valleys. As in other TMDC devices with an odd number of layers, the SdH oscillations in the 3L MoS2 device clearly exhibit an LL degeneracy of 3, implying the valley Zeeman splitting.

Quantum oscillations in even-layer TMDCs

The SdH oscillations in the representative 6L WS2 device emerge when B field is greater than 2.5 T (Fig. 3a). Although the gate voltages applied (Vg=50–70 V) to the 6L WS2 device are similar to those applied (Vg=40, 60 and 70 V) to the 9L MoS2 device, the period of SdH oscillations appears twice larger in the 6L WS2 device (Fig. 3b). Given that the experimentally accessible carrier density is low, the Fermi energy crosses only the lowest spin-degenerate sub-band at the Q/Q’ valleys in our calculated band structure of 6L WS2. The single sub-band nature is also evidenced by the unique period in the SdH oscillations (Fig. 3b). The linear fit of n versus BF0 (Fig. 3c) indicates a LL degeneracy of 11.8±0.1; the linear fit of the LL filling factors versus the SdH valley positions (Fig. 3d) yields a zero Berry phase. At a large field of 6.5 T, the secondary SdH valleys and doubling of the oscillation frequency are clearly visible because of the spin Zeeman splitting of LL duodectets into LL sextets (see Supplementary Fig. 4). The disappearance of secondary SdH valleys at around 10 K further indicates that the Lande factor is gL2.2 (Supplementary Table 1). Under similar experimental conditions, the presence of SdH valleys, as a result of the complete filling of a LL duodectet or sextet, has been repeatedly observed; for example, in a 6L MoS2 device (g=12/6 at low-/high-B fields in Fig. 3e,f), in a 10L WS2 device (g=12 in Fig. 3g,h) and in a 10L MoS2 (g=6 in Supplementary Fig. 5). Clearly, in contrast to odd-layer MoS2 devices (for example, 3L and 9L MoS2), even-layer MoS2 devices exhibit doubled LL degeneracies (see for example the data of 6L MoS2 in Fig. 3). We note that a tilted magnetic field will be helpful to further exploration of the TMDC QH effect and better determination of the physical parameters.

Figure 3: Quantum oscillations in even-layer TMDC.

(a d) Quantum oscillations in 6L WS2. (a) Resistance R as a function of B field at + 50 V (orange line), +60 V (blue line) and +70 V (black line) gate voltages. The inset shows the sample image. (b) ΔR plotted as a function of 1/B field yields an oscillation period 1/BF. The filling factors are labelled for the oscillation valleys. A twelve-fold LL degeneracy at low fields and six-fold LL degeneracy at high fields is observed, caused by the spin Zeeman splitting within each valley. (c) The total carrier density n obtained from the Hall measurements as a function of BF0 (black dots) for different gate voltages. The best fit (red line) indicates a LL degeneracy of 11.8±0.1. (d) LL filling factors as a function of 1/B for different gate voltages. The linear fit yields a zero Berry phase (the fitting results are in the range of −0.1 to+0.3 π) (e,f) Quantum oscillations in 6L MoS2. (e) R plotted as a function of B at the carrier density of 4.32 × 1012 cm−2 (f) ΔR curves plotted as a function of 1/B. The LL degeneracies derive from 12 at low-B fields to 6 at high-B fields. (g,h) Quantum oscillations of 10L WS2 show a LL degeneracy of 12. The negative magnetoresistance implies the existence of disorders, which might be the reason for the absence of the sixfold LLs at high-B fields.

The cyclotron mass m* in 6L WS2 is also investigated (See Supplementary Fig. 4). On the basis of the ΔR data plotted as a function of B and kBT at Vg=70 V (n=3.75 × 1012 cm−2), we obtain m*≈0.20±0.04me. This indirect experimental value of m* is again smaller than the effective mass 0.5me obtained in our DFT calculations. We noted that the limited amplitude of SdH oscillations and sample temperature uncertainty may cause certain deviation of m*. On the basis of the Ando formula, we further obtain the quantum scattering time τq=586 fs in the 6L WS2 device, which is smaller than the corresponding transport scattering time τt=1,300 fs (see Supplementary Fig. 6).

Spin-valley coupled Q valleys in few-layer TMDCs

Figure 4a,b show the calculated band structures of 3L MoS2 and 6L WS2 (see Supplementary Fig. 7 for the band structures of 3L WS2 and 6L MoS2), in which the minima of the conduction bands are not located at the K/K’ points, but rather at the Q/Q’ points, that is, between K(K’) and Γ points, with quadratic sub-bands. As illustrated in Fig. 4c, 3 Q and 3 Q’ valleys exist in the first Brillouin zone of the few-layer TMDCs. The C3 rotational symmetry dictates the threefold Q-valley degeneracy. For even-layer TMDCs, the Q and Q’ valleys are further related by both time reversal and spatial inversion symmetries, which require Kramers degeneracy. Consider the low carrier density in our 6L WS2 device, the Fermi energy is 2.9 meV above the valley edge and crosses only one spin-degenerate sub-band at each valley (see the inset of Fig. 4b). Thus, in the SdH oscillations, we observe a twelve-fold LL degeneracy at low fields and sixfold LL degeneracy at high fields caused by the spin Zeeman splitting within each valley, that is, between |Q↑> and |Q↓> states (see Fig. 4d). The valley Zeeman effect is absent because of the inversion symmetry.

Figure 4: Layer-dependent spin-valley coupled Q valleys in TMDCs.

(a) Calculated band structure of 3L MoS2. The bottom of conduction band is located at the Q (Q’) valleys. At the edge of each Q (Q’) valley, the Fermi level only crosses the lowest non-degenerate sub-band, whose spin-up and spin-down sub-bands are lifted by 4.3 meV. (b) Calculated band structure of 6L WS2. The energy bands are spin-degenerate at the edge of each Q (Q’) valley. These spin-valley coupled band edges are further illustrated in (c), where the red and blue colours denote the spin-down and spin-up bands, respectively. Q1, Q2 and Q3 have the same spin, and Q1’, Q2’ and Q3’ are their time reversals. (d) Schematic diagrams for the Bloch bands, showing the valley Zeeman effect in odd-layer devices and the spin Zeeman effect in even-layer devices. For odd-layer samples, the sub-band at Fermi level is non-degenerate at B=0; at relatively high magnetic field, the degeneracy between Q and Q’ valleys is further lifted by the valley Zeeman effect. It follows that an LL sextet can be lifted into two LL triplets caused by the valley Zeeman effect. For even-layer samples, the sub-band at Fermi level is spin-degenerate at B=0; at relatively high magnetic field, the degeneracy between up and down spins is lifted by the spin Zeeman effect. It follows that an LL duodectets can be lifted into LL sextets caused by the spin Zeeman effect.

In contrast to the even-layer case, the inversion symmetry in the odd-layer devices is intrinsically broken; thus, all the sub-bands at each Q valley are spin non-degenerate. In our 3L MoS2 device (Fig. 4a), for instance, the Fermi energy is 6.0 meV above the valley edge and crosses only the lowest sub-band, for which the spin-up and spin-down sub-bands are lifted by 4.3 meV. Thus, the SdH oscillations exhibit sixfold LL degeneracy, which is reduced to threefold when the Zeeman effect is large, as shown in Fig. 4d. Although both the spin-up and spin-down sub-bands contribute to the quantum transport, the beating pattern cannot be observed since they originate from the same sub-band and have the same effective mass. The Zeeman effect in this case is obviously a valley Zeeman splitting between |Q↑> and |Q’↓> states, as a linear combination of the spin, orbital and lattice Zeeman effects. Despite the complex orbital hybridizations and the strong spin–orbital couplings, because of time reversal symmetry orbital and spin characters are opposite for the Q and Q’ valleys, which can be split in the presence of B field. The lattice Zeeman effect arises from the opposite Berry curvatures of Bloch electrons at two valleys, which is also dictated by time reversal symmetry. In the inversion symmetric even-layer cases, the Berry curvature vanishes and so does the lattice Zeeman effect. Nevertheless, the Q/Q’ valley Zeeman effect, observed here for the first time in transport, is analogous to the K/K’ valley Zeeman effect observed using optical circular dichroism13,14,15,16.


Our realization of high-mobility TMDC devices and observation of their odd-even layer-dependence in the SdH oscillations, as well as the appearance of the onset of QH plateaus, are just the beginning for fully understanding the QH effects in atomically thin TMDCs. The existing theories focus exclusively on the K/K’ valleys of monolayers. However, the quantum transports at low density for multilayers are dominated either by the electrons at Q/Q’ valleys or the holes at the Γ valley. As there is only one quadratic sub-band across the Fermi level per Q valley in our current study, we are able to use the symmetry arguments and the well-known physics of the quadratic band to understand the observed even–odd layer-dependent behaviours in Zeeman effects. Further theoretical efforts are necessary in order to fully understand the quantum transports in atomically thin TMDCs. On the experimental side, the mobility of WS2 samples often appears higher than those of MoS2 samples; however, the observed SdH oscillations in MoS2 samples appear more pronounced. The observed SdH oscillations in odd-layer WS2 also appear weaker than that of even layers. Higher mobility and clearer knowledge of the stacking orders will be crucial for future systematic observations of QH effects in atomically thin TMDCs.

In summary, we demonstrate high-mobility TMDC FE transistors achieved by encapsulating atomically thin TMDCs between BN sheets. At moderate magnetic fields of 2.5–4 T and relatively low carrier density 1012 cm−2, the quantum oscillations are dominated by the Q valleys, exhibiting a universal even–odd layer dependence. Above 4 T, we observe spin Zeeman effects in even-layer devices and valley Zeeman effects in odd-layer devices. We also observe the onset of QH plateaus in the 3L device. The high-quality atomically thin BN-TMDC-BN-based FE transistors fabricated in this work pave the way for understanding the multi-valley band structures of few-layer TMDCs and for exploring their spin-valley entangled unconventional QH effects33.



MoS2 and WS2 crystals are grown by the chemical vapour transport method reported previously34. A mixture of Mo/W and S is first annealed in a sealed quartz tube at 800 °C. Then the polycrystalline powders together with iodine are annealed in a furnace (950 °C for the cold zone and 1,050 °C for the hot zone) for several weeks to grow large single crystals35,36. The as-grown 2H-type crystals are pre-examined by optical approaches before making FE transistors. The h-BN sources (Polartherm grade PT110) are bought from Momentive and annealed at a high temperature to improve the quality of BN crystals.

Sandwiched heterostructures

To eliminate impurities induced during device fabrication, we employ a polymer-free dry transfer technique in an inert environment of argon or nitrogen, as schematically demonstrated in Supplementary Fig. 8a,b. Atomically thin flakes are mechanically exfoliated on 300 nm SiO2/Si substrates by the scotch-tape microcleavage method. A selected FL XS2 (X=Mo/W) is picked up from the SiO2/Si substrate by a thin h-BN flake (5–15 nm thick) on PMMA (950 A7, 500 nm) via van der Waals interactions. The h-BN/XS2 flake is then transferred onto a fresh thick h-BN flake at 40–50 °C, which is exfoliated previously on a different SiO2/Si substrate, to form a BN-XS2-BN heterostructure. The BN-XS2-BN structure and the high-temperature annealing can guarantee the stability of our XS2 devices. In the annealing process (conducted in Ar atmosphere above 300 °C), the small bubbles formed at the interfaces between h-BN and XS2 are largely removed and the charge trap density are largely reduced.

Thickness determination

The thicknesses of XS2 flakes are characterized by atomic force microscopy (AFM, Veeco-Innva) as illustrated in Supplementary Fig. 9. The measured sample thicknesses dm and their numbers of layers are listed in Supplementary Table 2 (ref. 37, 38). Technically, the roughness of SiO2 substrate surface is 1 nm, so there is a large variance when measuring the thickness of TMDCs lying on SiO2/Si substrates. In this study, we use a different method to determine the sample thickness (see Supplementary Fig. 9). We leave a small part of WS2 uncovered (without the top BN) when making the sandwiched structure. The bottom BN layer provides a smooth background in the AFM signal. The variance of sample thickness is smaller than 0.1 nm and the accuracy of the calculated number of layers is thus ensured.

Selective etching process

To fabricate the metal electrodes, a hard mask is patterned on the BN-XS2-BN heterostructure by the standard electron-beam (e-beam) lithography technique using PMMA 950 A5 (see Supplementary Fig. 8c,d). Since the etching rate of XS2 by our reactive ion etching (CHF3:O2=4:40 s.c.c.m.) is lower than that of h-BN, the exposed top BN layer is then etched and XS2 is partially exposed. The electrodes are then patterned by e-beam lithography followed by O2 plasma etching (to remove PMMA residues) and standard e-beam evaporation (Ti/Au). Figure 1a–d show the schematic and the optical images of a typical BN-XS2-BN device with Hall-bar configurations. After the metal electrode deposition, the contact resistance is further reduced by a post annealing treatment at 300 °C in ambient pressure for 12 h.

Transport measurement

The ISDVSD curves are measured by Keithley 6430. Other transport measurements are carried out using the standard lock-in technique (SR 830 with SR550 as the preamplifier and DS 360 as the function generator) in a cryogenic system. The cryogenic system provides stable temperatures ranging from 1.8 to 300 K and magnetic fields up to 9 T. For comparison, the MoS2 device with graphene electrodes are fabricated and the device shows a complicated feature (see Supplementary Fig. 10). However, our MoS2 FE transistors connected by standard metal electrodes produce clean data which can be explained by DFT calculations fairly well. Since we use the same quality of MoS2 channel material to fabricate these two kinds of devices, we conclude that MoS2-graphene-mixed devices always display complicated oscillations of magnetotransport which cannot be understood yet.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the authors upon request.

Additional information

How to cite this article: Wu, Z. et al. Even-odd layer-dependent magnetotransport of high mobility Q-valley electrons in transition metal disulfides. Nat. Commun. 7, 12955 doi: 10.1038/ncomms12955 (2016).


  1. 1

    Novoselov, K. S. et al. Two-dimensional atomic crystals. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 10451–10453 (2005).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Ayari, A., Cobas, E., Ogundadegbe, O. & Fuhrer, M. S. Realization and electrical characterization of ultrathin crystals of layered transition-metal dichalcogenides. J. Appl. Phys. 101, 014507 (2007).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Mak, K. F., Lee, C., Hone, J., Shan, J. & Heinz, T. F. Atomically thin MoS2: a new direct-gap semiconductor. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 136805 (2010).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Wang, Q. H., Kalantar-Zadeh, K., Kis, A., Coleman, J. N. & Strano, M. S. Electronics and optoelectronics of two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides. Nat. Nanotechnol. 7, 699–712 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Xiao, D., Liu, G. B., Feng, W., Xu, X. & Yao, W. Coupled spin and valley physics in monolayers of MoS2 and other group-VI dichalcogenides. Phys. Rev. B 108, 196802 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Yao, W., Xiao, D. & Niu, Q. Valley-dependent optoelectronics from inversion symmetry breaking. Phys. Rev. B 77, 235406 (2008).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Zeng, H., Dai, J., Yao, W., Xiao, D. & Cui, X. Valley polarization in MoS2 monolayers by optical pumping. Nat. Nanotechnol. 7, 490–493 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Mak, K. F., He, K., Shan, J. & Heinz, T. F. Control of valley polarization in monolayer MoS2 by optical helicity. Nat. Nanotechnol. 7, 494–498 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Cao, T. et al. Valley-selective circular dichroism of monolayer molybdenum disulphide. Nat. Commun. 3, 887 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Wu, S. et al. Electrical tuning of valley magnetic moment through symmetry control in bilayer MoS2 . Nat. Phys. 9, 149–153 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Mak, K. F., McGill, K. L., Park, J. & McEuen, P. L. The valley Hall effect in MoS2 transistors. Science 344, 1489–1492 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Xiao, D., Liu, G.-B., Feng, W., Xu, X. & Yao, W. Coupled spin and valley physics in monolayers of MoS2 and other group-VI dichalcogenides. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 196802 (2012).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Li, Y. et al. Valley splitting and polarization by the Zeeman effect in monolayer MoSe2 . Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 266804 (2014).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Srivastava, A. et al. Valley Zeeman effect in elementary optical excitations of monolayer WSe2 . Nat. Phys. 11, 141–147 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    MacNeill, D. et al. Breaking of valley degeneracy by magnetic field in monolayerMoSe2 . Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 037401 (2015).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Aivazian, G. et al. Magnetic control of valley pseudospin in monolayer WSe2 . Nat. Phys. 11, 148–152 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Rostami, H. & Asgari, R. Valley Zeeman effect and spin-valley polarized conductance in monolayer MoS2 in a perpendicular magnetic field. Phys. Rev. B 91, 075433 (2015).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Stier, A. V., McCreary, K. M., Jonker, B. T., Kono, J. & Crooker, S. A. Exciton diamagnetic shifts and valley Zeeman effects in monolayer WS2 and MoS2 to 65 Tesla. Nat. Commun. 7, 10643 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Cheiwchanchamnangij, T. & Lambrecht, W. R. L. Quasiparticle band structure calculation of monolayer, bilayer, and bulk MoS2 . Phys. Rev. B 85, 205302 (2012).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Kappera, R. et al. Phase-engineered low-resistance contacts for ultrathin MoS2 transistors. Nat. Mater. 13, 1128–1134 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Cui, X. et al. Multi-terminal transport measurements of MoS2 using a van der Waals heterostructure device platform. Nat. Nanotechnol 10, 534–540 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Movva, H. C. P. et al. High-mobility holes in dual-gated WSe2 field-effect transistors. ACS Nano 9, 10402–10410 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Shuigang, X. et al. Universal low-temperature Ohmic contacts for quantum transport in transition metal dichalcogenides. 2D Mater. 3, 021007 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Liu, H. et al. Observation of intervalley quantum interference in epitaxial monolayer tungsten diselenide. Nat. Commun. 6, 8180 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Wu, Z. et al. Detection of interlayer interaction in few-layer graphene. Phys. Rev. B 92, 075408 (2015).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Castellanos-Gomez, A. et al. Deterministic transfer of two-dimensional materials by all-dry viscoelastic stamping. 2D Mater. 1, 011002 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Iqbal, M. W. et al. High-mobility and air-stable single-layer WS2 field-effect transistors sandwiched between chemical vapor deposition-grown hexagonal BN films. Sci. Rep. 5, 10699 (2015).

    ADS  MathSciNet  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Fallahazad, B. et al. Shubnikov-de Haas oscillations of high-mobility holes in monolayer and bilayer WSe2: Landau level degeneracy, effective mass, and negative compressibility. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 086601 (2016).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Chen, X. et al. High-quality sandwiched black phosphorus heterostructure and its quantum oscillations. Nat. Commun. 6, 7315 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30

    Nathaniel, G. et al. Gate tunable quantum oscillations in air-stable and high mobility few-layer phosphorene heterostructures. 2D Mater. 2, 011001 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  31. 31

    Li, L. et al. Quantum Hall effect in black phosphorus two-dimensional electron system. Nat. Nanotechnol. 11, 593–597 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32

    Mancoff, F. B., Zielinski, L. J., Marcus, C. M., Campman, K. & Gossard, A. C. Shubnikov-de Haas oscillations in a two-dimensional electron gas in a spatially random magnetic field. Phys. Rev. B 53, R7599–R7602 (1996).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33

    Li, X., Zhang, F. & Niu, Q. Unconventional quantum hall effect and tunable spin hall effect in dirac materials: application to an isolated MoS2 trilayer. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 066803 (2013).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34

    Ubaldini, A., Jacimovic, J., Ubrig, N. & Giannini, E. Chloride-driven chemical vapor transport method for crystal growth of transition metal dichalcogenides. Cryst. Growth Des. 13, 4453–4459 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35

    Song, I., Park, C. & Choi, H. C. Synthesis and properties of molybdenum disulphide: from bulk to atomic layers. RSC Adv. 5, 7495–7514 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36

    SuzukiR, et al. Valley-dependent spin polarization in bulk MoS2 with broken inversion symmetry. Nat. Nanotechnol. 9, 611–617 (2014).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37

    Wildervanck, J. C. & Jellinek, F. Preparation and crystallinity of molybdenum and tungsten sulfides. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 328, 309–318 (1964).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38

    Chang, J., Register, L. F. & Banerjee, S. K. Ballistic performance comparison of monolayer transition metal dichalcogenide MX2 (M=Mo, W; X=S, Se, Te) metal-oxide-semiconductor field effect transistors. J Appl. Phys. 115, 084506 (2014).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank Wing Ki Wong for her assistance in the sample preparation process. Financial support from the Research Grants Council of Hong Kong (Project Nos 16302215, HKU9/CRF/13G, 604112 and N_HKUST613/12) and technical support from the Raith–HKUST Nanotechnology Laboratory at MCPF are hereby acknowledged. F.Z. and A.K. are supported by UT Dallas Research Enhancement Funds and UT Dallas Undergraduate Research Scholar Awards. F.Z. is grateful to the Kavli Institute for Theoretical Physics for their hospitality during the finalization of this work, which is supported in part by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. PHY11-25915. G.-B.L is supported by the NSFC of China with Grant No. 11304014 and the 973 Program of China with Grant No. 2013CB934500. Y.Y. is supported by the MOST Project of China (Nos 2014CB920903 and 2016YFA0300603), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos 11574029 and 11225418).

Author information




N.W. and Z.W. conceived the projects. Z.W., H.L. and S.X. conducted the experiments, including the crystal growth, sample fabrication and the data collection. Z.W., S.X. and F.Z. analysed the data. N.W. directed the project. N.W. and F.Z. were the principal investigators. F.Z. and A.K. analysed and interpreted the SdH oscillations. F.Z. and G.-B.L. computed and interpreted the band structures. Z.W., F.Z. and N.W. wrote the manuscript. The other authors provided technical assistance in the sample preparation, data collection/analyses and experimental setup.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Fan Zhang or Ning Wang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figures 1-10 and Supplementary Tables 1-2 (PDF 971 kb)

Rights and permissions

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wu, Z., Xu, S., Lu, H. et al. Even–odd layer-dependent magnetotransport of high-mobility Q-valley electrons in transition metal disulfides. Nat Commun 7, 12955 (2016).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing