Abstract
The physics of the crossover between weakcoupling Bardeen–Cooper–Schrieffer (BCS) and strongcoupling Bose–Einstein condensate (BEC) limits gives a unified framework of quantumbound (superfluid) states of interacting fermions. This crossover has been studied in the ultracold atomic systems, but is extremely difficult to be realized for electrons in solids. Recently, the superconducting semimetal FeSe with a transition temperature T_{c}=8.5 K has been found to be deep inside the BCS–BEC crossover regime. Here we report experimental signatures of preformed Cooper pairing in FeSe, whose energy scale is comparable to the Fermi energies. In stark contrast to usual superconductors, large nonlinear diamagnetism by far exceeding the standard Gaussian superconducting fluctuations is observed below T*∼20 K, providing thermodynamic evidence for prevailing phase fluctuations of superconductivity. Nuclear magnetic resonance and transport data give evidence of pseudogap formation at ∼T*. The multiband superconductivity along with electron–hole compensation in FeSe may highlight a novel aspect of the BCS–BEC crossover physics.
Introduction
In the Bardeen–Cooper–Schrieffer (BCS) regime, weakly coupled pairs of fermions form the condensate wave function, while in the Bose–Einstein condensate (BEC) regime, the attraction is so strong that the fermions form local molecular pairs with bosonic character. The physics of the crossover is described by two length scales, the average pair size or coherence length ξ_{pair} and the average interparticle distance 1/k_{F}, where k_{F} is the Fermi wave number. In the BCS regime, the pair size is very large and k_{F}ξ_{pair}≫1, while local molecular pairs in the BEC regime lead to k_{F}ξ_{pair}≪1. The crossover regime is characterized by k_{F}ξ_{pair}∼1, or equivalently the ratio of superconducting gap to Fermi energy Δ/ɛ_{F} of the order of unity. In this crossover regime, the pairs interact most strongly and new states of interacting fermions may appear; preformed Cooper pairing at much higher temperature than T_{c} is theoretically proposed^{1,2}. Experimentally, however, such preformed pairing associated with the BCS–BEC crossover has been controversially debated in ultracold atoms^{3,4} and cuprate superconductors^{5,6,7,8}. Of particular interest is the pseudogap formation associated with the preformed pairs that lead to a suppression of lowenergy singleparticle excitations. Also important is the breakdown of Landau’s Fermi liquid theory due to the strong interaction between fermions and fluctuating bosons. In ultracold atomic systems, this crossover has been realized by tuning the strength of the interparticle interaction via the Feshbach resonance. In these artificial systems, Fermi liquidlike behaviour has been reported in thermodynamics even in the middle of crossover^{3}, but more recent photoemission experiments have suggested a sizeable pseudogap opening and a breakdown of the Fermi liquid description^{4}.
On the other hand, for electron systems in bulk condensed matter, it has been extremely difficult to access the crossover regime. Perhaps, the most frequently studied systems have been underdoped highT_{c} cuprate superconductors^{5,6,7,8} with substantially shorter coherence length than conventional superconductors. In underdoped cuprates, pseudogap formation and nonFermi liquid behaviour are well established, and unusual superconducting fluctuations have also been found above T_{c} (refs 6, 7). However, the pseudogap appears at a much higher temperature than the onset temperature of superconducting fluctuations^{8}. It is still unclear whether the system is deep inside the crossover regime and to what extent the crossover physics is relevant to the phase diagram in underdoped cuprates. It has been also suggested that in ironpnictide BaFe_{2}(As_{1−x}P_{x})_{2}, the system may approach the crossover regime in the very vicinity of a quantum critical point^{9,10}, but the finetuning of the material to a quantum critical point by chemical substitution is hard to accomplish. Therefore, this situation calls for a search of new systems in the crossover regime.
Among different families of ironbased superconductors, iron chalcogenides FeSe_{x}Te_{1−x} exhibit the strongest band renormalization due to electron correlations, and recent angleresolved photoemission spectroscopy studies for x=0.35−0.4 have shown that some of the bands near the Brillouin zone centre have very small Fermi energy, implying that the superconducting electrons in these bands are in the crossover regime^{11,12}. Among the members of the iron chalcogenide series, FeSe (x=0) with the simple crystal structure formed of tetrahedrally bonded layers of iron and selenium is particularly intriguing. FeSe undergoes a tetragonal–orthorhombic structural transition at T_{s}≈90 K, but in contrast to other Febased superconductors, no longrange magnetic ordering occurs at any temperature. Recently, the availability of highquality bulk single crystals grown by chemical vapour transport^{13} has reopened investigations into the electronic properties of FeSe. Several experiments performed on these crystals have shown that all Fermi surface bands are very shallow^{14,15,16}; one or two electron pockets centred at the Brillouin zone corner with Fermi energy , and a compensating cylindrical hole pocket near the zone centre with . FeSe is a multigap superconductor with two distinct superconducting gaps Δ_{1}≈3.5 and Δ_{2}≈2.5 meV (ref. 14). Remarkably, the Fermi energies are comparable to the superconducting gaps; Δ/ɛ_{F} is ∼0.3 and ∼1 for hole and electron bands, respectively^{14}. These large Δ/ɛ_{F}(≈1/(k_{F}ξ_{pair})) values indicate that FeSe is in the BCS–BEC crossover regime. In fact, values of 2Δ_{1}/k_{B}T_{c}≈9 and 2Δ_{2}/k_{B}T_{c}≈6.5, which are significantly enhanced with respect to the weakcoupling BCS value of 3.5, imply that the attractive interaction holding together the superconducting electron pairs takes on an extremely strongcoupling nature, as expected in the crossover regime. Moreover, the appearance of a new highfield superconducting phase when the Zeeman energy is comparable to the gap and Fermi energies, μ_{0}H∼Δ∼ɛ_{F}, suggests a peculiar superconducting state of FeSe (ref. 14). Therefore, FeSe provides a new platform to study the electronic properties in the crossover regime.
Here we report experimental signatures of preformed Cooper pairing in FeSe below T*∼20 K. Our highly sensitive magnetometry, thermoelectric and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) measurements reveal an almost unprecedented giant diamagnetic response as a precursor to superconductivity and pseudogap formation below T*. This yields profound implications on exotic bound states of strongly interacting fermions. Furthermore, the peculiar electronic structure with the electron–hole compensation in FeSe provides a new playground to study unexplored physics of quantumbound states of interacting fermions.
Results
Giant superconducting fluctuations
It is well known that thermally fluctuating droplets of Cooper pairs can survive above T_{c}. These fluctuations arise from amplitude fluctuations of the superconducting order parameter and have been investigated for many decades. Their effect on thermodynamic, transport and thermoelectric quantities in most superconductors is well understood in terms of standard Gaussian fluctuation theories^{17}. However, in the presence of preformed pairs associated with the BCS–BEC crossover, superconducting fluctuations are expected to be strikingly enhanced compared with Gaussian theories due to additional phase fluctuations. Moreover, it has been suggested that such enhanced fluctuations can lead to a reduction of the density of states (DOS), dubbed the pseudogap^{1,2}.
Quite generally, superconducting fluctuations give rise to an enhancement of the normalstate conductivity, which manifests itself as a downturn towards lower T of the resistivity versus temperature curve above T_{c}. The highfield magnetoresistance of compensated semimetals is essentially determined by the product of the scattering times of electron and hole bands^{14}. The large, insulatinglike upturn in ρ_{xx}(T) at high fields is thus an indication of the high quality of our crystals (Fig. 1a). At low temperatures, however, the expected downturn behaviour is observed, implying large superconducting fluctuations. Even at zero field, dρ_{xx}(T)/dT shows a minimum around T*∼20 K (Fig. 1b), indicating the appearance of excess conductivity below ∼T*. However, a quantitative analysis of this excess conductivity is difficult to achieve because it strongly depends on the extrapolation of the normalstate resistivity above T* to lower T. In addition, the resistivity may be affected by a change of the scattering time when a pseudogap opens at T* as observed in underdoped cuprates^{18}.
We therefore examine the superconducting fluctuations in FeSe through the diamagnetic response in the magnetization. The magnetization M(T) for magnetic field H parallel to the c axis (Supplementary Fig. 1) exhibits a downward curvature below ∼T*. This pronounced decrease of M(T) can be attributed to the diamagnetic response due to superconducting fluctuations. Figure 1c shows the diamagnetic response in the magnetization M_{dia} between 0 and 40 K for μ_{0}H=4, 8 and 12 T, obtained by subtracting a constant M as determined at 30 K. Although there is some ambiguity due to weakly temperaturedependent normalstate susceptibility, we find a rough crossing point in M_{dia}(T, H) near T_{c}. Such a crossing behaviour is considered as a typical signature of large fluctuations and has been found in cuprates^{19}. The thermodynamic quantities do not include the Maki—Thompsontype fluctuations. Hence, the fluctuationinduced diamagnetic susceptibility of most superconductors including multiband systems can be well described by the standard Gaussiantype (Aslamasov–Larkin, AL) fluctuation susceptibility χ_{AL} (refs 20, 21, 22), which is given by
in the zerofield limit^{23}. Here Φ_{0} is the flux quantum and ξ_{ab} (ξ_{c}) is the effective coherence lengths parallel (perpendicular) to the ab plane at zero temperature. In the multiband case, the behaviour of χ_{AL} is determined by the shortest coherence length of the main band, which governs the orbital upper critical field. The diamagnetic contribution χ_{AL} is expected to become smaller in magnitude at higher fields, and thus χ_{AL} yields an upper bound for the standard Gaussiantype amplitude fluctuations. In the inset of Fig. 1c, we compare χ_{dia} at 8 T with χ_{AL}, where we use ξ_{ab} (=5.5 nm) and ξ_{c} (=1.5 nm)^{14,15}. Obviously the amplitude of χ_{dia} of FeSe is much larger than that expected in the standard theory, implying that the superconducting fluctuations in FeSe are distinctly different from those in conventional superconductors.
The highly unusual nature of superconducting fluctuations in FeSe can also be seen in the lowfield diamagnetic response. Since the lowfield magnetization below 2 T is not reliably obtained from conventional magnetization measurements, we resort to sensitive torque magnetometry. The magnetic torque τ=μ_{0}V M × H is a thermodynamic quantity that has a high sensitivity for detecting magnetic anisotropy. Here V is the sample volume, M is the induced magnetization and H is the external magnetic field. For our purposes, the most important advantage of this method is that an isotropic Curie contribution from impurity spins is cancelled out^{24}.
At each temperature and field, the angledependent torque curve τ(θ) is measured in H rotating within the ac (bc) plane, where θ is the polar angle from the c axis. In this geometry, the difference between the c axis and ab plane susceptibilities, Δχ=χ_{c}−χ_{ab}, yields a πperiodic oscillation term with respect to θ rotation, (Fig. 2a; Supplementary Fig. 2; Supplementary Note 1)^{25,26}. In the whole measurement range, Δχ is negative, that is, χ_{ab}>χ_{c}, which is consistent with magnetic susceptibility^{27} and NMR Knightshift measurements^{28,29}. Figure 2b shows the T dependence of Δχ at 7 T, which is determined by the amplitude of the sinusoidal curve. At T_{s}, Δχ(T) exhibits a clear anomaly associated with the tetragonal–orthorhombic structural transition. On approaching T_{c}, Δχ shows a diverging behaviour. Figure 2c,d depicts the T and H dependence of Δχ(T,H), respectively. Above T*∼20 K, Δχ(T, H) is nearly field independent. Below T*, however, Δχ(T,H) increases with decreasing H, indicating nonlinear H dependence of M. This nonlinearity increases steeply with decreasing temperature. Since Δχ points to a diverging behaviour in the zerofield limit on approaching T_{c} (Fig. 2d), this strongly nonlinear behaviour is clearly caused by superconducting fluctuations.
Thus, the diamagnetic response of FeSe contains Hlinear and nonlinear contributions to the magnetization; Δχ(T) can be written as , where and represent the diamagnetic contributions from nonlinear and linear field dependence of magnetization, respectively, and Δχ_{N} is the anisotropic part of the normalstate susceptibility, which is independent of H. Since Δχ(T) is almost H independent at high fields (Fig. 2d), is estimated by subtracting Hindependent terms from Δχ. In Fig. 2e, we plot estimated from , which we compare with the expectation from the Gaussian fluctuation theory at zero field given by . Near T_{c}, at 0.5 T is nearly 10 times larger than Δχ_{AL}. It should be noted that since increases with decreasing H, in the zerofield limit should be much larger than at 0.5 T. Thus, the nonlinear diamagnetic response dominates the superconducting fluctuations when approaching T_{c} in the zerofield limit. We note that, although the AL diamagnetic contribution contains a nonlinear term visible at low fields, this term is always smaller than the AL fluctuation contribution at zero field^{20,21,22}.
Our magnetization and torque results provide thermodynamic evidence of giant superconducting fluctuations in the normal state of FeSe by far exceeding the Gaussian fluctuations. We stress that, since the energy scale of k_{B}T*∼2 meV is comparable to , it is natural to attribute the observed fluctuations to preformed pairs associated with the BCS–BEC crossover. In the presence of those pairs, superconducting phase fluctuations^{5} arising from the mode coupling of fluctuations are expected to be significantly enhanced and to produce a highly nonlinear diamagnetic response, as observed in the experiments. This nonlinear response with large amplitude is profoundly different from the Gaussian behaviour in conventional superconductors.
Pseudogap formation
Next, we discuss the possible pseudogap formation associated with the preformed pairs, which suppresses the DOS and hence leads to a change in quasiparticle scattering. We have measured the relaxation time T_{1} of ^{77}Se NMR spectroscopy in FeSe single crystals (Supplementary Fig. 3) at different fields applied along the c axis. At 14.5 T close to the upper critical field, the temperature dependence of 1/T_{1}T, which is dominated by the dynamical spin susceptibility χ(q) at the antiferromagnetic wave vector q=(π, π), can be fitted well by a Curie–Weiss law in a wide temperature range below T_{s} (Fig. 3a, inset). At low fields of 1 and 2 T, however, 1/T_{1}T(T) shows a noticeable deviation from this fit (dashed line in Fig. 3a, inset), and the difference between the fit and the lowfield data Δ(1/T_{1}T) starts to grow at ∼T* (Fig. 3a, main panel). As the superconducting diamagnetism is an orbital effect that is dominated at q=0, the spin susceptibility χ(π, π) is not influenced by the orbital diamagnetism. Therefore, the observed deviation of 1/T_{1}T(T) is a strong indication of a depletion of the DOS, providing spectroscopic evidence for the psedugap formation below ∼T *. The onset temperature and the field dependence of the nonlinear contribution of 1/T_{1}T(T) bear a certain similarity to the features of the diamagnetic susceptibility, pointing to the intimate relation between the pseudogap and preformed pairs in this system.
The pseudogap formation is further corroborated by the measurements of Hall (R_{H}), Seebeck (S) and Nernst (ν) coefficients (Fig. 3b–d). The negative sign of the Hall and Seebeck data indicates that the transport properties are governed mainly by the electron band, which is consistent with the previous analysis of the electronic structure in the orthorhombic phase below T_{s} (ref. 16). Obviously, at T *∼20 K, all the coefficients show a minimum or maximum. Since the Hall effect is insensitive to superconducting fluctuations, the minimum of R_{H}(∝(σ_{h}−σ_{e})/(σ_{h}+σ_{e})), where σ_{e(h)} is the conductivity of electrons (holes), suggests a change of the carrier mobility at ∼T *. The thermomagnetic Nernst coefficient consists of two contributions generated by different mechanisms: ν=ν_{N}+ν_{S}. The first term represents the contribution of normal quasiparticles. The second term, which is always positive, represents the contribution of fluctuations of either amplitude or phase of the superconducting order parameter. On approaching T_{c}, ν_{S} is expected to diverge^{30}. As shown in Fig. 3d, however, such a divergent behaviour is absent. This is because in the present very clean system, ν_{N} is much larger than ν_{S} (Supplementary Fig. 4a; Supplementary Note 2). Since ν_{N} and S are proportional to the energy derivatives of the Hall angle and conductivity at the Fermi level, respectively, and both sensitively detect the change of the energy dependence and/or anisotropy of the scattering time at the Fermi surface (see also Supplementary Fig. 4b,c for ν/T(T) and S/T(T)). Therefore, the temperature dependence of the three transport coefficients most likely implies a change in the quasiparticle excitations at T *, which is consistent with the pseudogap formation. We also note that anomalies at similar temperatures have been reported for the temperature dependence of the thermal expansion^{13} as well as of Young’s modulus^{29}. Recent scanning tunnelling spectroscopy data also suggest some suppression of the DOS at low energies in a similar temperature range^{31}.
Discussion
Figure 4 displays the schematic H–T phase diagram of FeSe for Hc. The fluctuation regime associated with preformed pairing is determined by the temperatures at which dρ_{xx}(H)/dT shows a minimum and ν(H) shows a peak (Supplementary Fig. 5a,b; Supplementary Note 3) in magnetic fields, as well as by the onset of Δ(1/T_{1}T) (Fig. 3a). The diamagnetic signal, NMR relaxation rate and transport data consistently indicate that the preformed pair regime extends over a wide range of the phase diagram. The phase fluctuations dominate at low fields where the nonlinear diamagnetic response is observed (Fig. 2d). This phasefluctuation region continuously connects to the vortex liquid regime above the irreversibility field H_{irr}, where a finite resistivity is observed with a broad superconducting transition (Fig. 1a).
Let us comment on the electronic specific heat, which is another thermodynamic quantity related to the DOS of quasiparticles. The specific heat C at comparatively high temperatures, however, is dominated by the phonon contribution ∝T^{3} (refs 29, 32), which makes it difficult to resolve the pseudogap anomaly. Also, the reduction of C/T may partly be cancelled with the increase by the strong superconducting fluctuations found in the present study. It should be also stressed that FeSe exhibits a semimetallic electronic structure with the compensation condition, that is, the electron and hole carrier densities should be the identical. Such a compensated situation of the electronic structure may alter significantly the chemical potential shift expected in the BEC theories for a singleband electronic structure. How the entropy in crossover semimetals behaves below T * is a fundamentally new problem, which deserves further theoretical studies.
Finally, we remark that the preformed Cooper pairs and pseudogap develop in the nonFermi liquid state characterized by a linearintemperature resistivity, highlighting the highly unusual normal state of FeSe in the BCS–BEC crossover regime. The resistivity above T * can be fitted up to ∼50 K as ρ_{xx}(T)=ρ_{xx}(0)+AT^{α} with α=1.1−1.2, where the uncertainty arises from the fact that ρ_{xx}(0) is unknown (Fig. 1b). Thus, the exponent α close to unity indicates a striking deviation from the Fermi liquid behaviour of α=2. This nonFermi liquid behaviour in FeSe is reminiscent of the anomalous normalstate properties of highT_{c} cuprate superconductors. The main difference between these systems and FeSe is the multiband nature of the latter^{34,35}; the Fermi surface consists of compensating electron and hole pockets. The present observation of preformed pairs together with the breakdown of Fermi liquid theory in FeSe implies an inherent mechanism that brings about singular inelastic scattering properties of strongly interacting fermions in the BCS–BEC crossover.
Methods
Sample preparation and characterization
Highquality single crystals of tetragonal βFeSe were grown by lowtemperature vapour transport method at Karlsruhe Institute of Technology and Kyoto University^{13}. As shown in Fig. 1b, taking ρ_{xx}(T_{c}^{+})≈10 μΩ cm as an upper limit of the residual resistivity leads to the residual resistivity ratio (RRR)>40. The large RRR value, large magnetoresistance below T_{s}, quantum oscillations at high fields^{15,16}, a very sharp ^{77}Se NMR line width^{29}, and extremely low level of impurities and defects observed by scanning tunnelling microscope topographic images^{14,33}, all demonstrate that the crystals used in the present study are very clean. The tetragonal structure is confirmed by singlecrystal Xray diffraction at room temperature. The tetragonal [100]_{T}/[010]_{T} is along the square edges of the crystals, and below the structural transition, the orthorhombic [100]_{O}/[010]_{O} along the diagonal direction.
Magnetization and magnetic torque measurements
The magnetization was measured using a vibrating sample option (VSM) of the Physical Properties Measurement System by Quantum Design. Supplementary Figure 1 shows temperature dependence of the magnetization in a single crystal of FeSe for several different fields. We obtained the diamagnetic response in the magnetization, M_{dia}, by shifting the curves to zero at 30 K, that is, by subtracting a constant representative of the normalstate magnetization ignoring the small paramagnetic Curie–Weiss contribution.
Magnetic torque is measured by using a microcantilever method^{25,26}. As illustrated in the inset of Fig. 2b, a carefully selected tiny crystal of ideal tetragonal shape with 200 × 200 × 5 μm^{3} is mounted on to a piezoresistive cantilever. The crystals contain orthorhombic domains with typical size of ∼5 μm below T_{s}. Supplementary Figure 2a–f shows the magnetic torque τ measured in various fields, where the field orientation is varied within a plane including the c axis (θ=0,180°) and the field strength H=H is kept during the rotation. The torque curves at 0.5 and 1T (Supplementary Fig. 2a and b) are distorted at 8.5 K, which is expected in the superconducting state of anisotropic materials^{36} whereas those above 9 K are perfectly sinusoidal.
NMR measurements
^{77}Se NMR measurements were performed on a collection of several oriented single crystals, and external fields (1, 2 and 14.5 T) are applied parallel to the c axis. Since ^{77}Se has a nuclear spin I=1/2, and thus no electric quadrupole interactions, the resonance linewidth of the NMR spectra are very narrow with full width at half maximum of a couple of kHz (Supplementary Fig. 3). The nuclear spinlattice relaxation rate 1/T_{1} is evaluated from the recovery curve R(t)=1−m(t)/m(∞) of the nuclear magnetization m(t), which is the nuclear magnetization at a time t after a saturation pulse. R(t) can be described by R(t)∝exp(−t/T_{1}) with a unique T_{1} in the whole measured region, indicative of a homogeneous electronic state. In general, 1/T_{1} for Hc is related to the imaginary part of the dynamical magnetic susceptibility χ(q, ω) by the relation
where A(q) is the transferred hyperfine coupling tensor along the c axis at the Se site and ω=γ_{n}/H with γ_{n}/(2π)=8.118 MHzT^{−1} is the NMR frequency. 1/T_{1}T at the Se site is mainly governed by the magnetic fluctuations at the Fe sites, that is, particularly in FeSe, the shortlived stripeantiferromagnetic correlations at q=(π, π) in the tetragonal notation. It should be noted that the superconducting diamagnetism is an orbital effect that is dominated at q=0 and thus it does not affect the dynamical spin susceptibility at q=(π, π).
Thermoelectric measurements
The thermoelectric coefficients were measured by the standard d.c. method with one resistive heater, two Cernox thermometers and two lateral contacts (Fig. 3d, inset). The Seebeck signal S is the transverse electric field response E_{x} (x), while the Nernst signal N is a longitudinal response E_{x} (x) to a transeverse temperature gradient ∇_{x}T(x) in the presence of a magnetic field H_{z} (z), that is, S≡E_{x}/(−∇_{x}T) and N≡E_{y}/(−∇_{x}T), respectively. The Nernst coefficient is defined as ν≡N/μ_{0}H.
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding authors (T.S. or Y.M.).
Additional information
How to cite this article: Kasahara, S. et al. Giant superconducting fluctuations in the compensated semimetal FeSe at the BCS–BEC crossover. Nat. Commun. 7:12843 doi: 10.1038/ncomms12843 (2016).
References
 1
Sá de Melo, C. A. R. When fermions become bosons: pairing in ultracold gases. Phys. Today 61, 45–51 (2008).
 2
Randeria, M. & Taylor, E. Crossover from BardeenCooperSchrieffer to BoseEinstein condensation and the unitary Fermi gas. Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 5, 209–232 (2014).
 3
Nascimbène, S., Navon, N., Jiang, K. J., Chevy, F. & Salomon, C. Exploring the thermodynamics of a universal Fermi gas. Nature 463, 1057–1060 (2010).
 4
Sagi, Y., Drake, T. E., Paudel, R., Chapurin, R. & Jin, D. S. Breakdown of Fermi liquid description for strongly interacting fermions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 075301 (2015).
 5
Emery, V. J. & Kivelson, S. A. Importance of phase fluctuations in superconductors with small superfluid density. Nature 374, 434–437 (1994).
 6
Corson, J., Mallozzi, R., Orenstein, J., Eckstein, J. N. & Bozovic, I. Vanishing of phase coherence in underdoped Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ . Nature 398, 221–223 (1999).
 7
Li, L. et al. Diamagnetism and Cooper pairing above T c in cuprates. Phys. Rev. B 81, 054510 (2010).
 8
Keimer, B., Kivelson, S. A., Norman, M. R., Uchida, S. & Zaanen, J. From quantum matter to hightemperature superconductivity in copper oxides. Nature 518, 179–186 (2015).
 9
Hashimoto, K. et al. A sharp peak of the zerotemperature penetration depth at optimal composition in BaFe2(As1−xPx)2 . Science 336, 1554–1557 (2012).
 10
Shibauchi, T., Carrington, A. & Matsuda, Y. A quantum critical point lying beneath the superconducting dome in ironpnictides. Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 5, 113–135 (2014).
 11
Lubashevsky, Y., Lahoud, E., Chashka, K., Podolsky, D. & Kanigel, A. Shallow pockets and very strong coupling superconductivity in FeSexTe1−x . Nat. Phys. 8, 309–312 (2012).
 12
Okazaki, K. et al. Superconductivity in an electron band just above the Fermi level: possible route to BCSBEC superconductivity. Sci. Rep. 4, 4109 (2014).
 13
Böhmer, A. E. et al. Lack of coupling between superconductivity and orthorhombic distortion in stoichiometric singlecrystalline FeSe. Phys. Rev. B 87, 180505(R) (2013).
 14
Kasahara, S. et al. Fieldinduced superconducting phase of FeSe in the BCSBEC crossover. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 16309–16313 (2014).
 15
Terashima, T. et al. Anomalous Fermi surface in FeSe seen by Shubnikovde Haas oscillation measurements. Phys. Rev. B 90, 144517 (2014).
 16
Watson, M. D. et al. Dichotomy between the hole and electron behavior in the multiband FeSe probed by ultra high magnetic fields. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 027006 (2015).
 17
Larkin, A. I. & Varlamov, A. Theory of Fluctuations in Superconductors Clarendon Press (2005).
 18
Kontani, H. Anomalous transport phenomena in Fermi liquids with strong magnetic fluctuations. Rep. Prog. Phys. 71, 026501 (2008).
 19
Welp, U. et al. Highfield scaling behavior of thermodynamic and transport quantities of YBa2Cu3O7−δ near the superconducting transition. Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 3180–3183 (1991).
 20
Ullah, S. & Dorsey, A. T. Effect of fluctuations on the transport properties of typeII superconductors in a magnetic field. Phys. Rev. B 44, 262–273 (1991).
 21
Ussishkin, I., Sondhi, S. L. & Huse, D. A. Gaussian Superconducting fluctuations, thermal transport, and the Nernst effect. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 287001 (2002).
 22
Soto, F. et al. Inplane and transverse superconducting fluctuation diamagnetism in the presence of chargedenisty waves in 2HNbSe2 single crystals. Phys. Rev. B 75, 094509 (2007).
 23
Aslamazov, L. G. & Larkin, A. I. Fluctuationinduced magnetic susceptibility of superconductors and normal metals. J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 40, 321 (1975).
 24
Watanabe, D. et al. Novel Pauliparamagnetic quantum phase in a Mott insulator. Nat. Commun. 3, 1090 (2012).
 25
Okazaki, R. et al. Rotational symmetry breaking in the hiddenorder phase of URu2Si2 . Science 331, 439–442 (2011).
 26
Kasahara, S. et al. Electronic nematicity above the structural and superconducting transition in BaFe2(As1−xPx)2 . Nature 486, 382–385 (2012).
 27
Grechnev, G. E. et al. Magnetic properties of superconducting FeSe in the normal state. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 25, 046004 (2013).
 28
Baek, S.H. et al. Orbitaldriven nematicity in FeSe. Nat. Mater. 14, 210–214 (2015).
 29
Böhmer, A. E. et al. Origin of the tetragonaltoorthorhombic phase transition in FeSe: a combined thermodynamic and NMR study of nematicity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 027001 (2015).
 30
Yamashita, T. et al. Colossal thermomagnetic response in the exotic superconductor URu2Si2 . Nat. Phys. 11, 17–20 (2015).
 31
Rössler, S. et al. Emergence of an incipient ordering mode in FeSe. Phys. Rev. B 92, 060505(R) (2015).
 32
Lin, J.Y. et al. Coexistence of isotropic and extended swave order parameters in FeSe as revealed by lowtemperature specific heat. Phys. Rev. B 84, 220507(R) (2011).
 33
Watashige, T. et al. Evidence for timereversal symmetry breaking of the superconducting state near twinboundary interfaces in fese revealed by scanning tunneling spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. X 5, 031022 (2015).
 34
Chubukov, A. V., Eremin, I. & Efremov, D. V. Superconductivity versus boundstate formation in a twoband superconductor with small Fermi energy: Applications to Fe pnictides/chalcogenides and doped SrTiO3 . Phys. Rev. B 93, 174516 (2016).
 35
Loh, Y. L., Randeria, M., Trivedi, N., Chang, C.C. & Scalettar, R. SuperconductorInsulator Transition and FermiBose Crossovers. Phys. Rev. X. 6, 021029 (2016).
 36
Kogan, V. G. Uniaxial superconducting particle in intermediate magnetic fields. Phys. Rev. B 38, 7049–7050 (1988).
Acknowledgements
We thank K. Behnia, I. Danshita, H. Kontani, A. Perali, M. Randeria and Y. Yanase for fruitful discussions. This work was supported by GrantsinAid for Scientific Research (KAKENHI) (nos 25220710, 15H05745, 15H02106 and 15H03688) and on Innovative Areas ‘Topological Material Science’ (no. 15H05852), and ‘JPhysics’ (nos. 15H05882, 15H05884 and 15K21732). The work of A.L. was supported by NSF grants no. DMR1606517 and no. ECCS1560732, and in part by Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation.
Author information
Affiliations
Contributions
S.K. and T.Wo. prepared the samples. S.K., T.Y., A.S., R.K, Y.S., T.Wa., K.I., T.T., F.H. and C.M. carried out the measurements. S.K., K.I., H.v.L., A.L., T.S. and Y.M. interpreted and analysed the data. T.S., Y.M., H.v.L., S.K. and A.L. wrote the manuscript with inputs from all authors.
Corresponding authors
Correspondence to T. Shibauchi or Y. Matsuda.
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Figures 15 and Supplementary Notes 13 (PDF 480 kb)
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Kasahara, S., Yamashita, T., Shi, A. et al. Giant superconducting fluctuations in the compensated semimetal FeSe at the BCS–BEC crossover. Nat Commun 7, 12843 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms12843
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Further reading

Generalized Crossover in Interacting Fermions within the LowEnergy Expansion
Journal of the Physical Society of Japan (2019)

Orbital selectivity versus Pomeranchuk instability in the iron–chalcogenide superconductors: A twoloop renormalization group study
Annals of Physics (2019)

Coexistence of giant Cooper pairs with a bosonic condensate and anomalous behavior of energy gaps in the BCSBEC crossover of a twoband superfluid Fermi gas
Physical Review B (2019)

Superconducting fluctuations in FeSe investigated by precise torque magnetometry
Physical Review B (2019)

Superconducting and tetragonaltoorthorhombic transitions in single crystals of FeSe1−xTex (0≤ x ≤0.61)
Physical Review B (2019)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.