Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Integrating an electrically active colloidal quantum dot photodiode with a graphene phototransistor


The realization of low-cost photodetectors with high sensitivity, high quantum efficiency, high gain and fast photoresponse in the visible and short-wave infrared remains one of the challenges in optoelectronics. Two classes of photodetectors that have been developed are photodiodes and phototransistors, each of them with specific drawbacks. Here we merge both types into a hybrid photodetector device by integrating a colloidal quantum dot photodiode atop a graphene phototransistor. Our hybrid detector overcomes the limitations of a phototransistor in terms of speed, quantum efficiency and linear dynamic range. We report quantum efficiencies in excess of 70%, gain of 105 and linear dynamic range of 110 dB and 3 dB bandwidth of 1.5 kHz. This constitutes a demonstration of an optoelectronically active device integrated directly atop graphene and paves the way towards a generation of flexible highly performing hybrid two-dimensional (2D)/0D optoelectronics.


A vast number of applications calls for highly sensitive detectors that can sense light from the ultraviolet to the short-wave infrared (SWIR) range, covering a broad spectrum of 300–3,000 nm1. Ideally these detector technologies should be based on CMOS compatible platforms for monolithic integration with read-out electronics to cater for high-density, high-throughput and low-cost manufacturing. Graphene2,3 and colloidal quantum dots (CQDs)4,5 are two material platforms that have proved to fulfil those requirements6,7,8,9. Essential features for highly sensitive photodetectors is the very high quantum efficiency expressed in the number of primary photo-generated carriers collected per incident photon, the low noise and the presence of an additional amplification mechanism, the gain, which is the number of electrically circulated carriers per incident photon. The electrical output of a photodetector is expressed by its responsivity (in A W−1 or V W−1) which is proportional to both the quantum efficiency and the gain. These parameters eventually determine the sensitivity of a photodetector quantified via the specific detectivity D*. D* is defined as , where NEP is the noise equivalent power, R is the responsivity, A is the optically active area of the detector, fB is the noise bandwidth and Sn is the noise spectral density of the detector.

Graphene’s unique properties such as high charge carrier mobility, atomically thin profile and broadband absorption has made this material a very attractive platform for photodetectors10. Graphene has rapidly proved to be excellent for ultrafast photodetectors11,12,13. The high carrier mobility enables ultrafast conversion of photons or plasmons to electrical currents or voltages. Yet, graphene’s atomically thin profile inhibits efficient optical absorption. Until now, most sensitive graphene-based photodetectors were phototransistors that relied on the presence of an electrically passive sensitizing layer that consisted of CQDs14,15, perovskites16, carbon nanotubes17 or other two-dimensional materials18,19. The passive aspect of the sensitizing layer has thus far limited the quantum efficiency (defined as the number of transferred charges per incident photon), linear dynamic range and speed of the detector. Namely, the external quantum efficiency (EQE) of these systems is a trade-off between light absorption, which increases for thicker sensitizing layers, and charge transfer, which decreases for thicker layers as it is limited by carrier diffusion towards the graphene channel. This has limited the quantum efficiency to about 25% for an optimized layer of CQDs of thickness 80 nm14, the time response, which is limited by the long trapping times of the sensitizing centres20 and the dynamic range, which is determined by the density of the trap-state sensitizing centres21.

In this letter, we address these three main challenges by presenting a photodetector architecture that is essentially a graphene–CQD photodiode and a high-gain phototransistor. This is realized by transforming the electrically passive sensitizing layer to an active one, where the electric field in the photodiode significantly enhances charge collection due to carrier drift instead of solely relying on diffusion. Our devices operate in the visible, near-infrared and SWIR range and show an EQE as high as 70–80% (limited by reflection), a sub-millisecond temporal response, a gain-bandwidth product on the order of 108 and a linear dynamic range in excess of 110 dB. This highly performing detector also exhibits very high sensitivity with experimentally measured D* of 1 × 1013 Jones.


Device structure and essence

Our photodetector platform integrates a CQD photodiode atop a graphene transistor. The CQD photodiode consists of an indium tin oxide (ITO) top-contact acting as the cathode of the CQD photodiode, whereas graphene acts as the hole acceptor contact and the charge transport channel for the phototransistor. Figure 1a illustrates a schematic of the hybrid graphene transistor—CQD photodiode detector. Figure 1b shows a top-view optical microscopy image of a typical device and the electrodes in use. The device consists of a graphene channel with a patterned 300-nm-thick CQD layer on top, which is overcoated with a top-contact of an ITO electrode. The active area of the photodetector is formed in the overlapping region of the three layers. The CQD layer is patterned to ensure that no charge carriers can escape from it to the drain contacts omitting the graphene. The read-out of the photodetector is then based on the voltage read-out at the sides of this active area, while source and drain electrodes are biased at a constant current (four-terminal sensing). Such device structure has been employed to eliminate the contact resistance from the measurements and to isolate the measurements over the active area of the photodetector from the area not covered by the ITO electrode. The electronic circuit and diagram of the device is illustrated in the side-view schematic of Fig. 1c.

Figure 1: Hybrid graphene–CQDs phototransistor with a transparent top-electrode.
figure 1

(a) Schematic of device structure. (b) Optical image of a device used in the study. Device elements are labelled. Borders of graphene channel are highlighted in black. Active device area is located between the inner graphene probes, marked as V+ and V−. CQD layer is deposited on the active area and exceeds it in size to ensure its uniform coverage and prevent shorts between the ITO and graphene channel. Scale bar, 30 μm. (c) Schematic of phototransistor operation. Incident light creates electron–hole pairs in the CQD layer. Electrons remain in the CQD, while holes, driven by depletion on the interface with graphene, are transferred to the graphene channel and alter its resistance. Constant current is driven between source and drain electrodes, while voltage drop is measured between V+ and V− electrodes. Thus, the photo-induced change in resistance (or voltage drop) is measured with the highest accuracy excluding the resistance of the metal and graphene contacts.

The essence of the device operation is captured in the band structure, shown in Fig. 2a, representing the operation without and with voltage applied on the ITO top-contact relative to drain electrode (VTD). Considering first operation without VTD: on carrier photogeneration in the CQD layer, holes are transferred to the graphene via drift from the narrow depletion region formed in the PbS QD solid near the graphene–QD interface and via diffusion further away from the quasi-neutral region. Prior studies have shown that efficient charge collection in this configuration occurs at an optimum thickness of 80–90 nm of PbS QDs, limited by the short carrier diffusion length22,23. In the case of a passive CQD sensitizing layer, the electrons remain trapped in the CQD solid and significant gain is achieved14 as:

Figure 2: Enhancement of photoresponse using a top-electrode.
figure 2

(a) Energy level diagrams of the graphene–CQDs interface without (top) and with (bottom) positive VTD voltage applied. Positive VTD voltage induces electrical field perpendicular to the graphene–CQDs interface and increases the depletion width and charge collection efficiency. The yellow area qualitatively indicates the change of depletion width on the scale below it. (b) Colour map of the photovoltage response as a function VBD and VTD for 100 mW m−2 illumination with a 635-nm light. Positive (red) and negative (blue) area correspond to injection of photo-generated holes into the n- and p-doped graphene. Dashed lines indicate the positions of cross-sections (e). (c) Resistance of the device’s active area as a function of VBD for fixed values of VTD specified in the legend. (d) Transconductance of the device as of VBD for fixed values of VTD specified in the legend. Presented curves demonstrate no significant change with increasing VTD. (e,f) Photovoltage response, in absolute values, taken from cross-sections of the colour map (b) at fixed values of VTD (e) and VBD (f) as specified in the legends.

where τlifetime is the carrier lifetime of the trapped electrons in the sensitizing centres of PbS QDs and τtransit is the transit time of holes in the graphene channel.

Significant enhancement in charge collection can be foreseen by the application of an electric field by using a transparent top-contact—ITO in this case. The application of VTD bias extends the depletion region in the 300-nm-thick CQD layer, amplifying thus the zone of efficient charge collection and concomitantly quantum efficiency. This enhancement is evident in Fig. 2b, which shows a map of the measured photovoltage of the detector as a function of the back-gate bias (VBD) and the top-contact bias (VTD), and Fig. 2e,f which represents line traces extracted from the map. The enhancement of the photoresponse on the application of a top-contact bias exceeds a factor of 4 at VTD=1.2 V, as compared with photoresponse at VTD=0 V. Further increase of VTD results in opposite effects and fully suppresses the photo-induced voltage change at VTD=4 V. This phenomenon is observed for any VBD value for both n-doped and p-doped graphene channel, and this is due to increased leakage current from the CQD photodiode (as discussed below). It is important to note that changing the potential of the top electrode induces a corresponding change in graphene doping; however, this change is weak and cannot account for the observed change in photocurrent. This is clear in Fig. 2c, which shows the weak dependence of graphene’s doping on the applied VTD as a result of suppressed gating via the CQD layer. Figure 2d shows the transconductance of the device (∂g/∂n) extracted from the corresponding resistance curves that is not affected by the electric bias of the top-contact, from which we conclude that the photoresponse enhancement is not due to increasing transconductance (see Supplementary Fig. 1 for more details).

Photodiode operation

To assess the origin of the enhancement of charge collection in the QD layer, we first operate the ITO–CQD—graphene as a photodiode, which enables us to independently measure the quantum efficiency of our device. To this end, we apply a VTD bias across the PbS QD layer and measure the current ITD as illustrated in the schematic of Fig. 3a, while floating the source V+ and V− contacts of the graphene. This structure operates as a photodiode in which a Schottky junction is formed at the graphene–QD interface. The diode characteristics are shown in Fig. 3b in dark and in Fig. 3c under optical illumination and confirm the formation of a Schottky junction at the graphene–QD interface, also evidenced by the presence of a built-in potential and the sustainment of open-circuit voltage under illumination. We measured the responsivity of the diode as a function of reverse applied bias. The quantum efficiency can be then directly calculated as:

Figure 3: Optoelectronic characterization of the graphene–CQD–ITO photodiode.
figure 3

(a) Schematic of graphene–CQDs photodiode operation. Incident light creates electron–hole pairs in the PbS quantum dots, which are drifted by the built-in electric field at the interface and by the bias applied across the diode. Source V+ and V− probes of the device are kept floating while ITD current is measured between top and drain probes. (b) Current–voltage characteristic of the graphene–CQD diode for gate-voltages VBD specified in the legend. Positive VTD induces reverse-biasing of the graphene–QD junction. Increasing VBD induces n-doping in the graphene channel and therefore increases the turn-on voltage of the diode. Inset: IV characteristic in logarithmic scale demonstrating diode leakage threshold around VTD=1 V. (c) IV characteristic of the graphene–CQD photodiode at different illumination intensities (values in the legend). Inset: IV characteristic in logarithmic scale demonstrating open-circuit voltage. (d) Responsivity and EQE of the graphene–CQD photodiode for illumination wavelength of 635 nm. Inset: band diagrams with and without VTD bias. Black line is a guide to the eye.

where RTD is the photodiode’s responsivity (Fig. 3d). In result, EQETD is measured to be 10% without any bias applied and increases with VTD to about 75% at 1.2 V reverse bias, beyond which it saturates. The inset of Fig. 3d illustrates the corresponding band diagrams corresponding to the two regimes of operation as a function of the reverse bias VTD: for VTD=0 V the photodiode operates at short circuit conditions and charge collection is facilitated by a small part via carrier drift within the thin depletion region at the graphene–QD interface and by a large part via carrier diffusion within the large quasi-neutral region of the QD layer24. With progressively increasing VTD, the depletion region grows and thus enhances the efficiency of the charge collection. The EQETD value at saturation of 75% is estimated to approach the optical reflection limited value at the front PbS QD–ITO–air interface23,25,26, suggesting a nearly 100% charge collection efficiency.

Phototransistor operation

To quantify the impact of the EQETD enhancement on the performance and speed of the phototransistor operation, we measured the responsivity and time response of the phototransistor as a function of VTD, plotted in Fig. 4a,b. For the bias current ISD of 100 μA, the responsivity reaches a value of 5 × 108 V W−1 at VTD of 1.2 V following the dependence of EQETD of the photodiode on VTD (Fig. 3d). For a photodetector with a current read-out circuit this corresponds to a responsivity of 2 × 106 A W−1 (see Methods). To corroborate our findings we also extracted the EQE of the phototransistor using the formula27 for responsivity (in units of VW−1) of photoconductive detectors:

Figure 4: Visible/near-infrared phototransistor characteristics.
figure 4

(a) Responsivity and EQE of the visible/near-infrared phototransistor as function of applied VTD. Blue line is a guide to the eye. (b) Normalized photoresponse as a function of light modulation frequency for VTD values specified in the legend. Light modulation frequency swept in the 250–3,000 Hz range. Inset: extracted 3 dB bandwidth values as a function of applied VTD and used for EQE calculations. (c) Photo-induced signal as a function of incident irradiance. Lowest detectable irradiance of 10−5 W m−2 was measured at VTD=1.2 V. The linear dynamic range of the detector increases with increasing VTD reaching over 110 dB at the optimal VTD. Selected VTD values are shown in the legend. Inset demonstrates the linearity of photoresponse for high irradiance values. (d) Measured responsivity of the detector in V W−1 (left axis) and responsivity converted in A W−1 (right axis, see Methods) as a function of incident irradiance. Selected VTD values are shown in the legend. The Illumination wavelength is 635 nm.

where λ the wavelength, e the elementary charge, h is the Planck constant, c the speed of light, RΩ is the detector’s resistance in dark and G is the photoconductive gain given by the ratio of carrier lifetime over the transit time. Here the carrier lifetime is governed by the time constant of the graphene–CQD–ITO photodiode response, in contrast with the case of the passive QD layer, in which carrier lifetime is determined by the sensitizing traps of the PbS QDs. To estimate the carrier lifetime τlifetime in our devices, we measured the photoresponse bandwidth of the phototransistor by sweeping the light modulation frequency fc as demonstrated in Fig. 4b. The temporal response of the detector accelerates with increasing VTD, reaching an electrical 3 dB bandwidth of 1.5 kHz for the optimum VTD, which corresponds to an effective τlifetime of 106 μs. The time response of the graphene–CQD–ITO photodiode when measured independently yields a temporal response composed of two time constant components (see Supplementary Fig. 2): one of 1 kHz and a faster one on the order of 10 kHz. The overall time constant of the hybrid phototransistor results from the contributions of the two time decay components of the CQD photodiode, and both its bandwidth and gain are mainly determined by the slower component. The transit time τtransit of the carriers traversing the graphene channel was calculated to be on the order of 1 ns by measuring the carrier mobility of the graphene (see Methods). This yields a photoconductive gain G on the order of 105 and gain-bandwidth product of >1.5 × 108 Hz. The extracted EQE of the phototransistor (shown in Fig. 4a) is in very good agreement with the directly measured EQETD of the photodiode. The responsivity follows the increase of EQE at lower values of VTD and reduces at higher values of VTD. This is due to the accelerated response of the photodetector, resulting in a corresponding reduction of the gain. The hybrid photodetector achieves a concomitant demonstration of responsivity of 5 × 108 V W−1, EQE of 75% and bandwidth of 1.5 kHz.

An equally important feature of a photodetector is its dynamic range for high-contrast applications such as remote sensing and imaging. We therefore showcase here the significant impact the transformation from a passive to an active sensitizing layer has on the dynamic range of the photodetector. The power dependence of the detector’s photoresponse expressed in ΔV is illustrated in Fig. 4c. In these measurements, we change VBD along with changing VTD to keep the value of RΩ at 3.7 kΩ, being the point of optimal photoresponse and highest DC transport mobility. Thus we keep the optimized values of (∂g/∂n) and RΩ and compensate for the slight gating effect, induced by VTD bias. Considering first the passively sensitized photodetector (at VTD=0 V the linear dynamic range is limited to 75 dB with an onset of photoresponse saturation at a power density of about 0.5 W m−2. With the application of VTD, we note a significant enhancement of the linear dynamic range of the detector to 110 dB at VTD of 1.2 V. The high linear dynamic range is even more evident in the flat responsivity response across the wide range of power density, as shown in Fig. 4d. This is the result of having a photodiode as the sensitizing element instead of a passive sensitizer. In the latter case, the detector operates as a photoconductor whose dynamic range depends on the density of the sensitizing centres14,21,28. To assess the ultimate sensitivity of our detector, we performed independent noise measurements that yield D* of 1 × 1013 Jones at a wavelength of 635 nm, and 1 kHz light modulation (see Supplementary Fig. 3). The accompanied enhancement of the detector responsivity as a function of illumination wavelength is illustrated in Supplementary Fig. 4, following the typical absorption spectrum of PbS QDs with a bandgap of 1.2 eV.

To showcase the power of our approach in extending the spectral coverage further into the short-wave infrared, where many applications require high sensitivity low-cost CMOS-compatible photodetectors, we report a phototransistor employing larger PbS QDs with absorption onset at 1.8 μm. The colour map in Fig. 5a shows the photoresponse of such device as a function of VTD and VBG, revealing up to factor 3 enhancement when activating the charge transfer by VTD. Maximum photoresponse in this device was found at VTD=0.3 V. Detailed characterization of this device is described in Supplementary Note 1. The temporal response of the SWIR-sensitive photodetector is faster compared with the visible–near-infrared devices described above, with a measured 3 dB bandwidth exceeding 4 kHz (Fig. 5b,c). Figure 5d illustrates the spectral photoresponse of the detector at a reverse VTD bias of 0.3 V, which shows that the responsivity of this device exceeds 1 × 108 V W−1 in the visible range and 4 × 107 V W−1 in the SWIR range. The calculated EQE is 14% for illumination wavelength of 1,600 nm and 35% for 635 nm, in both cases for the optimum VTD of 0.3 V. This is a sixfold improvement compared with VTD=0 V.

Figure 5: Visible/SWIR phototransistor characteristics.
figure 5

(a) Colour map of photovoltage response for a hybrid photodetector with large PbS CQDs as a function of the VBD and VTD. Positive (red) and negative (blue) area correspond to injection of photo-generated holes into the n- and p-doped graphene. The optimal VTD of 0.3 V results in a threefold increase of the photoresponse amplitude. Illumination is with 635-nm light and irradiance of 0.1 W m−2. (b) Photoresponse of the device as a function of the optical modulation. (c) Temporal response traces of the device at VTD=0 V (black) and VTD=0.3 V (red), demonstrating stable sub-millisecond photoresponse. (d) Spectral responsivity of the device with large PbS CQDs with exciton peak at 1,600 nm. The spectral sensitivity is determined by the absorption spectra of the quantum dots that can be readily tuned at their synthesis. The red line is a guide to the eye.


We report a photodetector platform that integrates an electrically active colloidal QD photodiode architecture with a graphene transistor. The former allows the achievement of high charge collection efficiency and therefore EQE, as well as fast photoresponse, whereas the latter enables the simultaneous demonstration of ultra-high gain. The use of a photodiode instead of a passive sensitizing layer gives access to a much broader performance parameter space, as the time response and the gain of the phototransistor is now dependent to the temporal response of the photodiode and the carrier mobility of the graphene channel. It also allows the exploitation of additional carrier multiplication effects previously observed in QDs photodetectors and solar cells29,30 giving rise to the possibility of higher responsivity without sacrifice of bandwidth. This hybrid architecture finally illustrates the potential of graphene and other two-dimensional materials to be successfully integrated with other optoelectronic materials and open new ways for hybrid two-dimensional/zero-dimensional optoelectronics.


Graphene FET fabrication

Metal contacts were designed on a precleaned Si/SiO2 (285 nm) wafer using a direct laser writer lithography. Ti/Pd electrodes (2 nm/40 nm thickness) were e-beam evaporated at a base pressure 10−3 mbar and lifted-off in warm acetone bath.

CVD graphene grown on copper foil was transferred by a poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA)-assisted wet process onto the substrate with metal contacts. Ammonium persulfate was used to etch the copper substrate. After the transfer, the substrate with metal contacts and PMMA/graphene film was dried overnight at room temperature. PMMA was then removed by warm acetone, followed by annealing in forming gas at 300 °C to remove residues.

Laser writer lithography and Ar/O2 plasma etching were used to pattern the graphene layer. Graphene stripes had dimensions of 70 × 10 nm with 10 × 10 μm area between V+ and V− electrodes.

PbS QD layer fabrication

The synthesis of PbS nanocrystals was carried out under inert conditions using a Schlenk line as previously described in literature31,32. The final PbS oleate-capped nanocrystals were dispersed in octane for device fabrication.

Electron beam lithography (EBL) was used to pattern 30 × 30 μm windows in PMMA resist at the centre of the graphene Hall bars. Desired PbS CQDs were then spin-coated right on the PMMA. Lift-off in warm acetone performed directly after spin-coating removed PMMA together with the excess of CQDs. As a result, the CQDs remained only in the areas defined by the lithography. The areas were designed to ensure isolation of the graphene channel from the ITO electrode introduced next and to fully cover the central region of the graphene Hall-bar.

PbS QD layers were fabricated by layer-by-layer spin-coating. For each layer, PbS solution (45 mg ml−1 in octane) was spin-cast onto the substrate at 2,500 r.p.m. for 15 s. Deposition of each layer was followed by spin-casting of EDT solution (2 vol.% in isopropanol) and two rinse-spin steps with octane and isopropanol. All the spin-coating steps were performed under ambient condition and at room temperature. The resulting thicknesses of nine PbS–EDT layers were 300±20 nm, as determined by a profilometer (Alpha-Step IQ).

ITO electrode deposition

About 150-nm-thick ITO layer was DC sputtered (2 mTorr, 60 W) to form a transparent electrode on top of the PbS layer. EBL lithography allowed to form the overlapping area of ITO, CQD and graphene precisely between the V+ and V− electrodes and avoid shortening of ITO and graphene channels. Each fabricated chip contained up to seven devices with top-electrodes.

Electrical characterization

All transport measurements were carried out at room temperature, in a shielded enclosure and vacuum (10−3 mbar) to improve the device stability. Device illumination was done through a viewport by a 635 nm wavelength diode laser, modulated with a mechanical chopper or turned on and off. The laser was coupled to a digital variable optical attenuator to provide output power tunability. In addition, a supercontinuum Vis/NIR laser (SuperK Select) was used to measure photoresponse spectra. Ithaco 1211 amplifier was used to measure ITD. Ithaco 1201 and Stanford SR810 amplifier were used for voltage read-out of photoresponse in combination with a mechanical light chopper with 250–3,000 Hz range.

We utilized NI DAQ 6230 as a voltage and TTI PLH250 as a current source in our measurements. For photovoltage read-out, a constant current of 100 μA was driven between the source and the drain probes, while V+ and V− probes were used to measure the differential voltage drop in the active area of the device.

Responsivity conversion

Directly measured values of responsivity in V W−1 can be converted into A W−1 for convenient comparison to photodetectors with current-based read-out and different bias using the formula:

where RV is the responsivity in V W−1, ESD is the electric field, L is the length of active area, ISD is the source–drain current and RΩ is the resistance of our detector. Ecomp is the electric field value used for comparison. Values presented in Fig. 4d were calculated for RΩ=3.7 kΩ, ISD=100 μA, L=10 μm and Ecomp=5 kV cm−1.

Transconductance, mobility and τtransit calculations

We calculate the transconductance of our phototransistor (∂g/∂n), where n is the charge carrier concentration in graphene, by taking a derivative of the RΩ (VBD) curve. Capacitive coupling of the 285-nm-thick SiO2 gate is 7 × 1010 cm−2 V−1.

Charge carrier mobility μ is then calculated for the positive (electron) and negative (hole) transconductance maximums using: ∂σ/∂n=e × μ, where e is elementary charge. Maximum transconductance of 2.4 S cm2 corresponds to 1,500 cm2 V−1 s−1 of electron mobility in graphene.

Transit time τtransit of charge carriers in the graphene channel is calculated as:

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon request.

Additional information

How to cite this article: Nikitskiy, I. et al. Integrating an electrically active colloidal quantum dot photodiode with a graphene phototransistor. Nat. Commun. 7:11954 doi: 10.1038/ncomms11954 (2016).


  1. Downs, C. & Vandervelde, T. E. Progress in infrared photodetectors since 2000. Sensors 13, 5054–5098 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Novoselov, K. S. et al. A roadmap for graphene. Nature 490, 192–200 (2012).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bonaccorso, F. et al. Production and processing of graphene and 2d crystals. Mater. Today 15, 564–589 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Talapin, D. V, Lee, J.-S., Kovalenko, M. V & Shevchenko, E. V. Prospects of colloidal nanocrystals for electronic and optoelectronic applications. Chem. Rev. 110, 389–458 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Konstantatos, G. & Sargent, E. H. Colloidal quantum dot photodetectors. Infrared Phys. Technol. 54, 278–282 (2011).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Banerjee, S. K. et al. Graphene for CMOS and beyond CMOS applications. Proc. IEEE 98, 2032–2046 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Huang, L. et al. Graphene/Si CMOS hybrid hall integrated circuits. Sci. Rep. 4, 5548 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kim, T.-H. et al. Full-colour quantum dot displays fabricated by transfer printing. Nat. Photon. 5, 176–182 (2011).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bao, J. & Bawendi, M. G. A colloidal quantum dot spectrometer. Nature 523, 67–70 (2015).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Koppens, F. H. L. et al. Photodetectors based on graphene, other two-dimensional materials and hybrid systems. Nat. Nanotechnol. 9, 780–793 (2014).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Xia, F., Mueller, T., Lin, Y.-M., Valdes-Garcia, A. & Avouris, P. Ultrafast graphene photodetector. Nat. Nanotechnol. 4, 839–843 (2009).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mueller, T., Xia, F. & Avouris, P. Graphene photodetectors for high-speed optical communications. Nat. Photon. 4, 297–301 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Schall, D. et al. 50 GBit/s photodetectors based on wafer-scale graphene for integrated silicon photonic communication systems. ACS Photonics 1, 781–784 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Konstantatos, G. et al. Hybrid graphene–quantum dot phototransistors with ultrahigh gain. Nat. Nanotechnol. 7, 363–368 (2012).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sun, Z. et al. Infrared photodetectors based on CVD-grown graphene and PbS quantum dots with ultrahigh responsivity. Adv. Mater. 24, 5878–5883 (2012).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lee, Y. et al. High-performance perovskite-graphene hybrid photodetector. Adv. Mater. 27, 41–46 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Liu, Y. et al. Planar carbon nanotube-graphene hybrid films for high-performance broadband photodetectors. Nat. Commun. 6, 8589 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Roy, K. et al. Graphene-MoS2 hybrid structures for multifunctional photoresponsive memory devices. Nat. Nanotechnol. 8, 826–830 (2013).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhang, W. et al. Ultrahigh-gain photodetectors based on atomically thin graphene-MoS2 heterostructures. Sci. Rep. 4, 3826 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Konstantatos, G., Clifford, J., Levina, L. & Sargent, E. H. Sensitive solution-processed visible-wavelength photodetectors. Nat. Photon. 1, 531–534 (2007).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Konstantatos, G., Levina, L., Fischer, A. & Sargent, E. H. Engineering the temporal response of photoconductive photodetectors via selective introduction of surface trap states. Nano Lett. 8, 1446–1450 (2008).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhitomirsky, D., Voznyy, O., Hoogland, S. & Sargent, E. H. Measuring charge carrier diffusion in coupled colloidal quantum dot solids. ACS Nano 7, 5282–5290 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Carey, G. H. et al. Colloidal quantum dot solar cells. Chem. Rev. 115, 12732–12763 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Clifford, J. P. et al. Fast, sensitive and spectrally tuneable colloidal-quantum-dot photodetectors. Nat. Nanotechnol. 4, 40–44 (2009).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Maraghechi, P. et al. The donor-supply electrode enhances performance in colloidal quantum dot solar cells. ACS Nano 7, 6111–6116 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Koleilat, G. I. et al. Folded-light-path colloidal quantum dot solar cells. Sci. Rep. 3, 2166 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Dereniak, E. L. & Boreman, G. D. Infrared Detectors and Systems. Infrared Detectors and Systems Wiley (1996).

  28. Konstantatos, G. & Sargent, E. H. PbS colloidal quantum dot photoconductive photodetectors: transport, traps, and gain. Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 173505 (2007).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Semonin, O. E. et al. Peak external photocurrent quantum efficiency exceeding 100% via MEG in a quantum dot solar cell. Science 334, 1530–1533 (2011).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Davis, N. J. L. K. et al. Multiple-exciton generation in lead selenide nanorod solar cells with external quantum efficiencies exceeding 120. Nat. Commun. 6, 8259 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Mihi, A., Beck, F. J., Lasanta, T., Rath, A. K. & Konstantatos, G. Imprinted electrodes for enhanced light trapping in solution processed solar cells. Adv. Mater. 26, 443–448 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Ip, A. H. et al. Hybrid passivated colloidal quantum dot solids. Nat. Nanotechnol. 7, 577–582 (2012).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


G.K. acknowledges financial support from AGAUR under the SGR grant (2014SGR1548) and a Ramon y Cajal Fellowship from MINECO. F.H.L.K. acknowledges support by the ERC Career integration grant (294056, GRANOP), the ERC starting grant (307806, CarbonLight), the Mineco grants RYC-2012-12281 and FIS2013-47161-P, and partial support by the EC under the Graphene Flagship (contract no. CNECT-ICT-604391). We also acknowledge financial support from Fundacio Privada Cellex and from the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness, through the ‘Severo Ochoa’ Programme for Centres of Excellence in R&D (SEV-2015-0522). We are also thankful to Óscar Vázquez Mena, and Juan José Piqueras for fruitful discussions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



G.K. and F.H.L.K. supervised the study. I.N. fabricated and characterized the devices. T.L. synthesized the quantum dots. D.K. developed some of the fabrication processes. S.G. and G.N. provided inputs for device fabrication and characterization. G.K., F.H.L.K. and I.N. wrote the manuscript with inputs from the co-authors.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Frank H. L. Koppens or Gerasimos Konstantatos.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figures 1-5 and Supplementary Note 1 (PDF 541 kb)

Rights and permissions

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nikitskiy, I., Goossens, S., Kufer, D. et al. Integrating an electrically active colloidal quantum dot photodiode with a graphene phototransistor. Nat Commun 7, 11954 (2016).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing