Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Electronic phase separation at the LaAlO3/SrTiO3 interface

Abstract

There are many electronic and magnetic properties exhibited by complex oxides. Electronic phase separation (EPS) is one of those, the presence of which can be linked to exotic behaviours, such as colossal magnetoresistance, metal–insulator transition and high-temperature superconductivity. A variety of new and unusual electronic phases at the interfaces between complex oxides, in particular between two non-magnetic insulators LaAlO3 and SrTiO3, have stimulated the oxide community. However, no EPS has been observed in this system despite a theoretical prediction. Here, we report an EPS state at the LaAlO3/SrTiO3 interface, where the interface charges are separated into regions of a quasi-two-dimensional electron gas, a ferromagnetic phase, which persists above room temperature, and a (superconductor like) diamagnetic/paramagnetic phase below 60 K. The EPS is due to the selective occupancy (in the form of 2D-nanoscopic metallic droplets) of interface sub-bands of the nearly degenerate Ti orbital in the SrTiO3. The observation of this EPS demonstrates the electronic and magnetic phenomena that can emerge at the interface between complex oxides mediated by the Ti orbital.

Introduction

The perovskite oxides have emerged as one of the most scientifically and technologically interesting material systems. They display a broad range of physical manifestations, including charge-ordered insulator, double-exchange ferromagnet and high-temperature superconductor. Experimental observation of nanoscopic electronic phase separation (EPS) in oxides (for example, underdoped cuprates and doped manganites) in both bulk and thin films1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9 is of particular interest owing to the speculation that EPS can result in novel electronic properties such as the colossal-magnetoresistive behaviour. In the case of manganites, orbital selective occupancy, Coulomb interaction, Hund's coupling and Jahn–Teller distortions have a significant role in determining the nature of the electronic and magnetic states.

The potential of these oxides is further increased by the recent discovery of a variety of new and unusual electronic phases at their interfaces10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20. A particularly fascinating system is the interface between the perovskite insulators LaAlO3 and SrTiO3, where the existence of a quasi-two-dimensional (quasi-2D) metallic electron layer13 with signatures of a weak magnetic14 or a superconducting state15,16, a metal-to-insulator transition17,18, correlated electron behaviour19 and coupled electron hole bilayers20 has been reported. The electronic properties observed at this interface have been attributed to the electronic reconstruction13,21 that is needed to overcome the diverging Coulomb field of the polar LaAlO3 layer22. Theoretical studies have suggested that the induced interface charges (0.5e per unit cell) are typically spread over several layers, which correspond to several partially filled sub-bands23 that can lead to ferromagnetism24,25,26. Caviglia et al.16 performed electrostatic doping experiments on these superconducting interface samples and successfully modulated their critical temperature (Tc) but did not observe the existence of ferromagnetism or any other magnetic phase.

Recently, Popović et al.23 have theoretically predicted that the transferred charges at the LaAlO3/SrTiO3 interface occupy nearly ten interface sub-bands. This suggests that EPS is also possible in this system, with most of the charges preferably transferred to a couple of sub-bands in an inhomogeneous fashion. Here, we show evidence for the existence of EPS in this material system. Analyses of electrical, magnetization and magneto-transport data clearly show the separation of the interface charges into a quasi-2D electron gas, ferromagnetic phases persisting above room temperature and strongly diamagnetic and/or paramagnetic phases below 60 K. The EPS is explained on the basis of selective occupancy of interface sub-bands made of the nearly degenerate t2g orbitals of Ti 3d-states in the SrTiO3. Thus, the LaAlO3/SrTiO3 is an active interface the magnetic properties of which can be tailored by processing conditions, temperature and magnetic fields.

Results

Sample growth and electronic transport properties

LaAlO3/SrTiO3 interfaces were prepared in a wide range of oxygen partial pressures (PO2) from 1×10−6 to 5×10−2 mbar (Methods section). The samples fall under two classes, that grown at low pressure and at high pressure. The sheet resistances (Fig. 1a) of the samples grown at PO2≤10−5 mbar (low-pressure samples) are 10 Ω/□ at 300 K and 1 mΩ/□ at 5 K, with an almost constant carrier density of 1017 cm−2 and an increase in mobility to 104 cm2 V−1 s−1 at 5 K (Fig. 1b), which is consistent with earlier reports13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,27,28. The large carrier density of the samples grown in this pressure range indicates a three-dimensional (3D) conductivity that is most likely dominated by oxygen vacancies28,29,30,31. The sheet resistances of the samples grown at PO2≥10−4 mbar (high-pressure samples) are 9–13 kΩ/□ at 300 K and gradually decrease to 200 Ω/□ at 5 K; carrier density (Fig. 1c) is reduced by a factor of four from (0.8–1.0)×1014 cm−2 at 300 K to (2.0–2.5)×1013 cm−2 at 5 K, indicating significant charge localization. The mobility (Fig. 1c) increases significantly to 103 cm2 V−1 s−1 at 5 K, which suggests that metallic and other (non-conducting) electronic phases coexist. Furthermore, the overall resistivity exhibits metallic behaviour without any discontinuity, despite the change in carrier densities through localization by a factor of four and the mobility enhancement of more than an order of magnitude.

Figure 1: Electrical properties.
figure1

(a) Sheet resistance (Rs) versus temperature (T) of ten unit cells of LaAlO3 on SrTiO3 prepared at 850 °C under different oxygen partial pressures (PO2) of 10−5, 10−4, 10−3 and 10−2 mbar, while still maintaining 2D growth. (b) Carrier density (n) and mobility (μ) as a function of temperature for samples prepared at 10−5 mbar. (c) n and μ as a function of temperature for samples prepared at 10−4, 10−3 and 10−2 mbar.

Magnetic properties

Figure 2 summarizes the magnetic properties of the samples grown at PO2=1×10−2 mbar. For all the samples described here, the total area of the surface and the volume of the samples are the same (ten unit cells LaAlO3 on 5×5×0.5 mm3 SrTiO3). It must be noted that the PO2 under which these films were prepared is at least an order of magnitude higher than those used in previously published reports. Figure 2a shows the zero-field-cooled (ZFC) and field-cooled (FC) magnetization data of the samples as a function of temperature (collected while warming the sample from 2 to 300 K using a small (0.1 kOe) applied magnetic field). For ZFC, a large negative magnetization value indicating a giant diamagnetic response is observed below 60 K, whereas for FC (1 kOe), a positive value, which indicates a paramagnetic response, is seen. In a separate set of measurements, magnetization loops as a function of applied magnetic field (±2 kOe sweep) starting with a positive field were measured at several temperatures. Notably, there is an overlapping ferromagnetic response in addition to the diamagnetic or paramagnetic response, as seen in the form of hysteresis loops extending up to room temperature (Fig. 2a, also shown in Fig. 2c after background subtraction). In these field sweep curves, the standard temperature-independent diamagnetic contribution of the SrTiO3 substrate is also discernable. Depending on the cool-down field, the starting point of the hysteresis loops is approximately centered on the diamagnetic (ZFC case) or paramagnetic (FC case) saturation value. Magnetization as a function of temperature under various cooling temperatures and magnetic fields for the ten unit cells of LaAlO3/SrTiO3 samples prepared at PO2=1×10−2 mbar is shown in Figure 2b. To rule out any contamination issue, secondary ion mass spectrometric (SIMS) studies were performed, and no evidence of any magnetic element such as Fe, Co, Mn, Ni or Cr was seen in the samples (Methods section). In addition to the electrical data that suggest the coexistence of metallic and other electronic phases, these magnetization data show the coexistence of ferromagnetic phase along with diamagnetic or paramagnetic phases, which support the EPS state at the LaAlO3/SrTiO3 interface.

Figure 2: Magnetic properties.
figure2

(a) The 1 kOe FC and ZFC in-plane magnetization (M) data as a function of temperature (T) and measured by a 0.1 kOe magnetic field applied while warming the sample from 2 to 300 K (solid black lines) for the ten unit cells of LaAlO3/SrTiO3 samples prepared at an oxygen partial pressure (PO2) of 1×10−2 mbar. In a separate measurement after ZFC, ferromagnetic hysteresis loops centred on the diamagnetic branch are observed when sweeping a ±2 kOe magnetic field applied at each temperature. Similar ferromagnetic loops are also observed on the paramagnetic branch when the hysteresis loops are collected after FC (not shown here for clarity). (b) Magnetization as a function of temperature under various cooling temperatures and magnetic fields for the ten unit cells of LaAlO3/SrTiO3 samples prepared at PO2=1×10−2 mbar. (c) The temperature-dependent ferromagnetic loops in a after diamagnetic and paramagnetic subtraction.

Magnetoresistance

Further evidence for the existence of EPS was provided by magnetoresistance (MR) measurements as a function of the angle between the current and field direction. The results are shown for three different conditions as depicted in Figure 3: a magnetic field perpendicular to the ab plane of the substrate and current, a magnetic field parallel to the ab plane along the current direction and a magnetic field parallel to the ab plane but perpendicular to the current direction. In the case of magnetic field perpendicular to the ab plane, the cyclotron precession enhances the transit path of the electrons and, if there are electronically phase-separated regions, enhanced scattering of the carriers will occur, resulting in a positive MR (for all temperatures between 5–300 K) that would increase with the magnitude of the field, as is indeed seen in the present case. This supports the idea of phase-separated ferromagnetic regions as opposed to a homogeneous ferromagnetic layer. In the case of a magnetic field parallel to the ab plane along the current direction, there is no cyclotron precession. Instead, alignment of the ferromagnetic regions by the magnetic field makes the scattering more coherent, and hence a negative MR is seen in all applied magnetic fields. This result strongly supports the presence of ferromagnetic scattering centres. In the last case, a magnetic field parallel to the ab plane but perpendicular to the current direction, at low fields, where the electron path is enhanced and incoherent scattering is dominant, a positive MR is seen. At higher fields, the increased coherence of the magnetic regions reduces the electron scattering and a negative MR develops. Hence, the MR data clearly support an EPS scenario involving ferromagnetic regions embedded in a metallic layer. Furthermore, in all cases, the MR values are enhanced significantly at low temperatures with a transition starting at 60 K, which is in very good agreement with the temperature at which the magnetization value also increases.

Figure 3: MR.
figure3

The MR, (RHR0)/R0 where RH is the resistance under a finite magnetic field and R0 under zero field, is shown as a function of the applied magnetic fields (H) at different temperatures (T) for three distinct cases as sketched in the insets: (a) magnetic field perpendicular to the current (I) and the substrate surface, (b) magnetic field parallel to the current and the substrate surface and (c) magnetic field parallel to the substrate surface but perpendicular to the current.

Growth pressure dependence

The existence of the EPS state critically depends on the LaAlO3/SrTiO3 interface-processing parameters, mainly PO2. Figure 4a,b shows the magnetic response of various samples grown at different PO2. For samples grown at PO2≤1×10−3 mbar, the magnetic responses are much smaller, with an almost unnoticeable transition in the ZFC cases. From the point of view of this paper, the most interesting regime is the high PO2 region, which has not been explored thoroughly until now because it is too close to the 3D growth regime. However, all our samples prepared at PO2≤1×10−2 mbar show clean reflection high-energy electron diffraction (RHEED) oscillations, indicating 2D growth (Methods section).

Figure 4: Influence of the processing parameters.
figure4

(a) Magnetization (M) as a function of temperature (T) for samples prepared under different oxygen partial pressures (PO2) of 10−5, 10−4, 10−3 and 10−2 mbar. (b) The ZFC and FC magnetization data as a function of PO2 conditions. The data were taken while warming the samples from 2 to 300 K in a 0.1 kOe applied magnetic field. (c) The ZFC and FC magnetization data of SrTiO3 prepared under conditions similar to those used for the 1×10−2 mbar LaAlO3/SrTiO3 samples (PO2=1×10−2 mbar, T=850 °C). (d) The temperature-dependent X-ray diffraction pattern of SrTiO3 show the splitting of the (003) peaks (splitting of other peaks not shown) that appears at temperatures between 73 and 53 K, and grows as the temperature is reduced to 12 K.

Role of SrTiO3 substrate

What is the role of each material in the LaAlO3/SrTiO3 interface structure? To answer this question, we subjected the TiO2-terminated SrTiO3 substrates to identical surface preparation, temperature, oxygen partial pressure and cool-down conditions without deposition of any LaAlO3 layer on top. Surprisingly, the diamagnetic (ZFC) and paramagnetic (FC) transitions also appeared (Fig. 4c) but with values 50% lower than that observed in the LaAlO3/SrTiO3 samples. Furthermore, a tiny magnetic hysteresis loop was seen that was one order of magnitude smaller than that seen in the case of LaAlO3/SrTiO3. It should be noted that as-received and TiO2-terminated SrTiO3 substrates that are not subjected to the above processing steps show no magnetic effect. Intriguingly, the 60 K transition temperature below which a very large magnetic response is observed coincides with low-temperature structural phase transitions in SrTiO3 (tetragonal to orthorhombic at 65 K and then to rhombohedral at a lower temperature)32,33. As can be seen in Figure 4d, the temperature-dependent X-ray diffraction data for the samples show that splitting of the SrTiO3 diffraction peaks starts to appear between 73 and 53 K, and grows as the temperature is reduced to 12 K, indicating phase transformation in SrTiO3. This indicates that the surface of the SrTiO3 and its phase transition are critical for the origin of these magnetic properties and that the role of LaAlO3 is to significantly amplify these effects via formation of a quasi-2D electron gas at the LaAlO3/SrTiO3 interface.

Discussion

In the following section, we will discuss the possible origin of EPS in this system. Electronic structure calculations by Popović et al.23 suggest that all the transferred electrons (0.5e per interface La-atom) are shared by nearly ten interface bands near the Fermi energy. The corresponding charge density is spatially homogeneous in the direction parallel to the interface and quickly decays in the direction perpendicular to the layer. The interface bands are primarily derived from 3dxy or 3dxz or 3dyz orbitals of the Ti atoms. It is known1 that electron–electron or electron–lattice interactions, Jahn–Teller effects, strain and disorder can modify the band picture considerably and lead to nanoscale charge inhomogeneities. Are we seeing a preferential occupancy of a smaller number of bands, that is, about three out of ten, in a spatially inhomogeneous fashion?

Our hypothesis is that transferred charges in a few unit cells of thickness get organized into three states: a quasi-2D dense electron domains (nanoscopic droplets) with a large (superconductor like) diamagnetic moment that have a predominant occupancy in the dxy orbitals, a quasi-2D ferromagnetic nanoscopic regions that have a predominant (close to half filling) occupancy in the (dyz)1(dxz)1 orbitals and a background of quasi-2D electron gas derived from dxy orbitals. Three possible sources for the high-temperature ferromagnetism are the dxz and dyz orbitals within a single layer provide one-dimensional bands and therefore a larger density of states and corresponding Stoner enhancement, a possibility that 2e occupy the dxz and dyz orbitals in a spin triplet state and carriers in the dxy permit double exchange similar to that seen in manganites or Ruderman–Kittel–Kasuya–Yosida exchange due to high-mobility electrons. The observed magnetic effects in the treated SrTiO3 samples can be explained by a migration of electron-like carriers from a finite density of vacancies to the surface of the samples to gain free energies similar to that of the transferred charges at the LaAlO3/SrTiO3 interface.

The crucial factor that explains why the three states, that is, ferromagnetic, diamagnetic and/or paramagnetic, and the quasi-2D electron gas can coexist within a few unit cells of the LaAlO3/SrTiO3 interface is their nearly identical free-energy density. The polarization state of SrTiO3 at nanoscopic scales and other factors, including temperature, control how the interface charges are distributed among the three electron reservoirs. The observation of EPS in this system opens up yet another exciting correlated electron system to scientific study. Besides revealing new phenomena in physics, these unusual magnetic properties may be of use in the fabrication of novel magneto-electronic and tunable magneto-optic devices.

Methods

Sample growth

The LaAlO3/SrTiO3 interfaces were prepared by depositing ten unit cells of LaAlO3 on a TiO2-terminated 0.5-mm-thick SrTiO3 (001) substrate (double-side polished) in a wide range of PO2 from 1×10−6 to 5×10−2 mbar at 850 °C using pulsed laser deposition and a single-crystal LaAlO3 target. To get single-terminated surfaces, SrTiO3 was treated with buffered hydrofluoric acid and annealed at 950 °C in oxygen34. Using this treatment, an atomically flat SrTiO3 surface was obtained, as confirmed by atomic force microscopy. The laser pulse (248 nm) energy density was 1.8 J cm−2 and the repetition rate was 1 Hz. During deposition, the film growth was monitored using in situ RHEED, which revealed layer-by-layer growth for samples grown in 1×10−6 up to 1×10−2 mbar (close to 3D growth) deposition pressure (Fig. 5a,b). For samples grown at 5×10−2 mbar, the RHEED oscillation started to deviate from normal layer-by-layer growth, indicating an island growth (Fig. 5c). After deposition, all samples were cooled to room temperature in oxygen at the deposition pressure.

Figure 5: Sample growth.
figure5

RHEED data for samples prepared at oxygen partial pressure (PO2) of (a) 1×10−4 mbar and (b) 1×10−2 mbar show clean oscillations that indicate 2D growth. (c) A deformed RHEED oscillation for a sample grown at 5×10−2 mbar indicates commencement of a 3D growth process.

Electrical and magnetic measurements

The sheet resistance, carrier density and Hall mobility were measured using a Van der Pauw geometry. Before the electrical transport measurements, the magnetic properties of the samples were measured using superconducting quantum interference devices magnetometry. For measurements of the magnetization as a function of temperature, the samples were first cooled to 2 K. The magnetization data were then collected using a series of low magnetic fields ranging from 0.005 to 0.5 kOe during warming from 2 K to room temperature. The magnetic field was applied parallel to the sample surface.

SIMS

SIMS studies were performed on both magnetic and non-magnetic samples. The SIMS depth profile data (Fig. 6a) for the magnetic LaAlO3 (ten unit cells)/SrTiO3 sample show that the impurity (including magnetic elements such as Fe, Ni, Co, Cr and Mn) signals are within the measurement noise. The content of magnetic elements in the magnetic LaAlO3 (ten unit cells)/SrTiO3 sample and the non-magnetic SrTiO3 substrate (Fig. 6b) was calculated based on relative sensitivity factors from Stevie and Wilson35. It is clear that all the impurities in the magnetic and non-magnetic samples is within the noise level, which is at a concentration level of greater than four orders of magnitude lower than the Sr/Ti concentration. Furthermore, the magnetic samples do not show any significant deviation in the concentration of magnetic elements such as Fe, Co, Mn, Ni or Cr compared with the non-magnetic elements.

Figure 6: SIMS.
figure6

(a) The SIMS depth profile data for the magnetic LaAlO3 (ten unit cells)/SrTiO3 show the total counts (n) versus sputtering time for all the detected elements (Sr, Ti, La, Al, B, C, Na, Mg, Si, K, Ca, Cr, Mn, Fe, Ni, Co, Cu, Nb, Ta and Bi). All impurity elements show traces below ten counts. (b) The content of magnetic elements (Cr, Mn, Fe, Ni and Co) in the magnetic LaAlO3 (ten unit cells)/SrTiO3 sample and the non-magnetic SrTiO3 substrate.

Additional information

How to cite this article: Ariando et al. Electronic phase separation at the LaAlO3/SrTiO3 interface. Nat. Commun. 2:188 doi: 10.1038/ncomms1192 (2011).

References

  1. 1

    Dagotto, E., Hotta, T. & Moreo, A. Colossal magnetoresistant materials: the key role of phase separation. Phys. Rep. 344, 1–153 (2001).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Shenoy, V. B., Sarma, D. D. & Rao, C. N. R. Electronic phase separation in correlated oxides: the phenomenon, its present status and future prospects. Chem. Phys. Chem. 7, 2053–2059 (2006).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Cox, S. et al. Sliding charge-density wave in manganites. Nat. Mater. 7, 25–30 (2008).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Shenoy, V. B. & Rao, C. N. R. Electronic phase separation and other novel phenomena and properties exhibited by mixed-valent rare-earth manganites and related materials. Philos. Trans. A 366, 63–82 (2008).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Ward, T. Z. et al. Elastically driven anisotropic percolation in electronic phase-separated manganites. Nat. Phys. 5, 885–888 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Moreo, A., Yunoki, S. & Dagotto, E. Phase separation scenario for manganese oxides and related materials. Science 283, 2034–2040 (1999).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Uehara, M. Percolative phase separation underlies colossal magnetoresistance in mixed-valent manganites. Nature 399, 560–563 (1999).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Allodi, G. et al. Electronic phase separation in lanthanum manganites: evidence from 55Mn NMR. Phys. Rev. B 56, 6036–6046 (1997).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Emery, V. & Kivelson, S. Frustrated electronic phase separation and high-temperature superconductors. Physica C 209, 597–621 (1993).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Ohtomo, A. et al. Artificial charge-modulation in atomic-scale perovskite titanate superlattices. Nature 419, 378–380 (2002).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Okamoto, S. & Millis, A. Electronic reconstruction at an interface between a Mott insulator and a band insulator. Nature 428, 630–633 (2004).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Hwang, H. Y. Atomic control of the electronic structure at heterointerfaces. MRS Bull 31, 28–35 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Ohtomo, A. & Hwang, H. Y. A high-mobility electron gas at the LaAlO3/SrTiO3 heterointerface. Nature 427, 423–426 (2004).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Brinkman, A. et al. Magnetic effects at the interface between non-magnetic oxides. Nat. Mater. 6, 493–496 (2007).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Reyren, N. et al. Superconducting interfaces between insulating oxides. Science 317, 1196–1199 (2007).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Caviglia, A. D. et al. Electric field control of the LaAlO3/SrTiO3 interface ground state. Nature 456, 624–627 (2008).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Thiel, S. et al. Tunable quasi-two-dimensional electron gases in oxide heterostructures. Science 313, 1942–1945 (2006).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Cen, C. et al. Nanoscale control of an interfacial metal–insulator transition at room temperature. Nat. Mater. 7, 298–302 (2008).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Breitschaft, M. et al. Two-dimensional electron liquid state at LaAlO3-SrTiO3 interfaces. Phys. Rev. B 81, 153414 (2010).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Pentcheva, R. et al. Parallel electron-hole bilayer conductivity from electronic interface reconstruction. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 2–5 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Hesper, R., Tjeng, L. H. & Sawatzky, G. A. Photoemission evidence of electronic stabilization of polar surface in K3C60 . Phys. Rev. B 62, 16046–16055 (2000).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Nakagawa, N., Hwang, H. Y. & Muller, D. A. Why some interfaces cannot be sharp. Nat. Mater. 5, 204–209 (2006).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Popović, Z., Satpathy, S. & Martin, R. Origin of the two-dimensional electron gas carrier density at the LaAlO3 on SrTiO3 interface. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 256801 (2008).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Okamoto, S., Millis, A. J. & Spaldin, N. A. Lattice relaxation in oxide heterostructures: LaAlO3/SrTiO3 superlattices. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 056802 (2006).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Pentcheva, R. & Pickett, W. E. Correlation-driven charge order at the interface between a Mott and a band insulator. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 016802 (2007).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Pentcheva, R. & Pickett, W. E. Charge localisation or itineracy at LaAlO3/SrTiO3 interfaces: hole polarons, oxygen vacancies, and mobile electrons. Phys. Rev. B 74, 035112 (2006).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Bell, C. et al. Thickness dependence of the mobility at the LaAlO3/SrTiO3 interface. Appl. Phys. Lett. 94, 222111 (2009).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Kalabukhov, A. et al. Effect of oxygen vacancies in the SrTiO3 substrate on the electrical properties of the LaAlO3/SrTiO3 interface. Phys. Rev. B 75, 2–5 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Herranz, G. et al. High mobility in LaAlO3/SrTiO3 heterostructures: origin, dimensionality, and perspectives. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 216803 (2007).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30

    Siemons, W. et al. Origin of charge density at LaAlO3 on SrTiO3 heterointerfaces: possibility of intrinsic doping. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 196802 (2007).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31

    Basletic, M. et al. Mapping the spatial distribution of charge carriers in LaAlO3/SrTiO3 heterostructures. Nat. Matter. 7, 621–625 (2008).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32

    Lytle, F. W. X-ray diffractometry of low-temperature phase transformations in strontium titanate. J. Appl. Phys. 35, 2212–2215 (1964).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33

    Neville, R., Hoeneisen, B. & Mead, C. Permittivity of strontium titanate. J. Appl. Phys. 43, 2124–2131 (1972).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34

    Kawasaki, M. et al. Atomic control of the SrTiO3 crystal surface. Science 266, 1540–1542 (1993).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35

    Stevie, F. A. & Wilson, R. G. Relative sensitivity factors for positive atomic and molecular ions sputtered from Si and GaAs. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 9, 3064–3070 (1991).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank D. Lai Mei Ying from the Institute of Materials Research and Engineering (IMRE) for the SIMS measurement, D.H.A. Blank, A. Brinkman, R.L. Greene, M. Huijben, J.R. Kirtley, A.J. Millis, G. Rijnders and W.M. Lu for discussions, and the National Research Foundation (NRF) Singapore under the Competitive Research Programme 'Tailoring Oxide Electronics by Atomic Control', NUS YIA, NUS cross-faculty grant and FRC for financial support. H.H. acknowledges the Dutch Foundation for Fundamental Research on Matter (FOM) and the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

A., X.W. and J.H. prepared the samples. A. and X.W. conducted electrical and magnetic measurements with the assistance from Z.Q.L., A.A. and J.B.Y. Low temperature XRD measurement was done by J.B.Y. and J.D. Insight and expertise on physical mechanism were provided by T.V., G.B., H.H. and Y.P.F. The manuscript was prepared by A. and T.V. with the assistance from X.W., G.B., H.H., S.D., A.R. and A.R.B. The project was led by A.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ariando.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ariando, Wang, X., Baskaran, G. et al. Electronic phase separation at the LaAlO3/SrTiO3 interface. Nat Commun 2, 188 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms1192

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing