Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Cryptic prophages help bacteria cope with adverse environments


Phages are the most abundant entity in the biosphere and outnumber bacteria by a factor of 10. Phage DNA may also constitute 20% of bacterial genomes; however, its role is ill defined. Here, we explore the impact of cryptic prophages on cell physiology by precisely deleting all nine prophage elements (166 kbp) using Escherichia coli. We find that cryptic prophages contribute significantly to resistance to sub-lethal concentrations of quinolone and β-lactam antibiotics primarily through proteins that inhibit cell division (for example, KilR of rac and DicB of Qin). Moreover, the prophages are beneficial for withstanding osmotic, oxidative and acid stresses, for increasing growth, and for influencing biofilm formation. Prophage CPS-53 proteins YfdK, YfdO and YfdS enhanced resistance to oxidative stress, prophages e14, CPS-53 and CP4-57 increased resistance to acid, and e14 and rac proteins increased early biofilm formation. Therefore, cryptic prophages provide multiple benefits to the host for surviving adverse environmental conditions.


The term prophage was coined in 1952 by André Lwoff, who along with François Jacob and Jacques Monod, discovered that phages use lysogeny (incorporation into the chromosome) as a means to replicate, and who believed that lysogeny is a window into our understanding of the relationship between bacteria and phages1. Because of their prevalence, acquisition of prophages contributes most to the horizontal gene transfer, as phage-like elements have been identified in almost all sequenced pathogenic and non-pathogenic bacterial genomes, and can constitute up to 20% of the DNA2 even though bacteria have compact genomes. Although it has been reasoned for decades that metabolically inert prophage DNA would cause a selective disadvantage to the host3, the role of much of this prophage material remains largely unknown.

Prophages may become trapped in the chromosome of the host due to various genome rearrangements and gradual decay4 and become inactive in terms of cell lysis, phage particle production and plaque formation; these prophage elements are referred to as cryptic prophages (we use active prophage here to indicate prophage capable of forming plaques). The well-studied Escherichia coli K-12 has gained 1,600 kbp of novel DNA (18%) since its divergence from Salmonella sp. 100 million years ago5 and contains nine cryptic prophage elements, which comprise 3.6% of its genome. Clearly prophage rac is a DNA fossil as it was acquired over 4.5 million years ago6. Most examples indicating a role of prophages in cell physiology involve active prophage; these include the Bor protein of phage lambda, which increases the survival of E. coli by providing resistance to serum-mediated killing7. Along with lambda, active Mu, P1 and P2 prophages also increase growth under glucose-limited growing conditions3,8, and we have shown that cryptic prophage CP4-57 increases cell growth in several media9. In addition, prophage-encoded virulence factors make important contributions to pathogenesis including those of Corynebacterium diphtheriae (diphtheria), Clostridium botulinum (botulism) and E. coli O157:H7 (Shiga-like toxin)10. Active prophages such as Gifsy-2 can also give the Salmonella host a competitive advantage by killing competitors and by providing immunity11. In these cases, the reproductive success of the lysogenic bacterium carrying these new genes translates directly into an evolutionary success for the prophage resident in the chromosome.

With the emergence of global systems biology tools such as DNA microarrays, cryptic prophage genes have gradually gained attention, as part of host physiology, especially under conditions where the cells are stressed such as those that exist in biofilms12. Our goal here was to begin to understand the evolutionary importance of cryptic prophage elements by exploring the function of prophage genes on cell physiology. To this end, we created a single E. coli strain, Δ9, that lacks all nine cryptic prophages (CP4-6, DLP12, e14, rac, Qin, CP4-44, CPS-53, CPZ-55 and CP4-57); each prophage was removed precisely using a method that leaves one attachment site and mimics natural excision. Two systems biology tools, phenotype and DNA microarrays, were then used to identify the altered phenotypes and to elucidate the important prophage genes responsible for the changes in the phenotypes. Strikingly, we determined that the poorly studied cryptic prophage genes increased growth, provided protection for quinolone and β-lactam antibiotics, increased resistance to osmotic, oxidative and acid stress, as well as influenced biofilm formation. Therefore, these cryptic prophage genes have a profound, beneficial impact on cell physiology.


Prophages increase cell growth

To assess the overall effect of harbouring nine cryptic prophages (Fig. 1) on E. coli host physiology, growth of the Δ9 strain (Table 1) was tested in nutrient-rich medium at 37 °C (to mimic conditions that E. coli should encounter in the gastrointestinal tract) and in nutrient-poor medium at 30 °C (to mimic the cooler temperatures likely to be experienced by E. coli outside the human host). The maximum specific growth rates for Δ9 were decreased slightly in both media (1.36±0.01 versus 1.46±0.02 h−1 in rich medium and 0.25±0.02 versus 0.28±0.01 h−1 in minimal medium for Δ9 and the wild-type strain, respectively); however, the prophage-deleted cells had decreased yields on these substrates (Fig. 2a,b). In addition, growth of each of the nine individual prophage-deletion strains (Table 2) was tested. Among the nine strains, growth in both media was reduced the most on removing CP4-57 (Fig. 2c,d). Hence, prophages confer the ability to grow more rapidly and to obtain higher yields on nutrients.

Figure 1: Size and position of nine cryptic prophages in the E. coli K-12 BW25113 genome.

Map of the E. coli K-12 BW25113 genome demonstrating the cyptic prophages deleted in this study.

Table 1 The genes in each cryptic prophage and the method used to remove each of the nine prophages from E. coli K-12.
Figure 2: Cryptic prophage genes influence cell growth.

Growth in LB at 37 °C (a) and M9C at 30 °C (b) for Δ9 (open circle) and the wild-type strain (filled circle). Growth of the nine individual prophage deletion strains (CP4-6, open diamond; DLP12, filled diamond; e14, open hexagon; rac, inverted open triangle; Qin, filled triangle; CPS-53, inverted filled triangle; CP4-44, open square; CPZ-55, open triangle and CP4-57, filled square), Δ9 (open circle) and the wild-type strain (filled circle) in LB at 37 °C (c) and M9C lactate at 37 °C (d). Error bars indicate s.d. values (n=3).

Table 2 E. coli K-12 bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study.

Prophages increase resistance to quinolone antibiotics

To examine the impact of deleting the nine cryptic prophages on specific aspects of E. coli physiology, we used phenotype microarrays (PMs) so that 1,240 different metabolic conditions could be rapidly assayed in a high-throughput manner13; this method both amplifies and quantifies the differences in metabolism of the strains. Using plates PM 11–13, six quinolone antibiotics (four shown in Fig. 3a and six in Supplementary Table S1) dramatically inhibited the growth of Δ9 at concentrations that are 1/2 of the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for the wild-type strain. These include first generation oxolinic acid and nalidixic acid, second-generation enoxacin, lomefloxacin and ofloxacin, and the related novobiocin agent. Quinolones are broad-spectrum antibacterial agents that are becoming increasingly popular and account for 18% of the antibacterial market (2006)14.

Figure 3: Cryptic prophage genes influence stress-related phenotypes.

(a) Summary of the PM results for the wild-type strain versus Δ9. The fold changes indicate the relative difference in the average slope in the growth curves multiplied by the area under the curves, which is indicative of cell respiration. From left to right, with the MIC indicated for the wild-type strain in parenthesis, quinolones include nalidixic acid (4 μg ml−1), oxolinic acid (0.9 μg ml−1), ofloxacin (0.048 μg ml−1) and novobiocin (132 μg ml−1); β-lactams include nafcillin (320 μg ml−1), azlocillin (17.6 μg ml−1), cephalothin (5.12 μg ml−1) and moxalactam (0.27 μg ml−1); osmolytes include 5% NaCl, 6% NaCl, 6% KCl and 2% sodium formate; and the other stresses include thallium acetate and potassium tellurite. All chemicals shown here were significantly repressed for Δ9 versus wild-type strain (P<0.05 using a paired t-test). Error bars indicate s.e.m. (n=3). (b) Efficiency of colony formation for Δ9 and the wild-type strain with sublethal concentrations of nalidixic acid (2 μg ml−1) and azlocillin (5 μg ml−1) as well as with 6% NaCl. Powers of 10 indicate the amount of dilution. Scale bar represents 10 mm. (c) Cell morphology for Δ9 and wild-type strain after treating with 2 μg ml−1 nalidixic acid for 2 h. Scale bar represents 10 μm.

To confirm the results from the PM assays, the MIC99 of nalidixic acid, defined as the lowest drug concentration that inhibits growth by 99%15, was measured, and a 2.1-fold decrease in the MIC99 of Δ9 was found (3.9 μg ml−1) compared with the wild-type strain (8.0 μg ml−1). Note that MIC values are based on turbidity so they do not discriminate between bactericidal or bacteriostatic action16. Therefore, to further assess the bactericidal action of quinolone antibiotics, cell viability of the wild-type strain and Δ9 were also tested with 2 μg ml−1 nalidixic acid. Critically, the viability of Δ9 was repressed 379-fold for 2 μg ml−1 nalidixic acid (Fig. 3b); hence, the relatively small change in MIC is not representative of the large effect on cell viability caused by the prophage. A similar large change in viability was seen previously with a relatively small change in MIC for nalidixic acid and a defect in chromosome partitioning17.

In Gram-negative bacteria, quinolone targets DNA gyrase and triggers an SOS response (global response to DNA damage) at sub-lethal concentrations18. Induction of the SOS response in E. coli causes inhibition of cell division via FtsZ19. Thus, the cell morphology of exponentially growing wild-type and Δ9 cells treated with 2 μg ml−1 nalidixic acid for 2 h was examined, and it was found that Δ9 cells are more elongated than the wild-type strain (Fig. 3c). Hence, the increased filamentous growth in Δ9 confirms inhibition of cell division when cells encounter DNA gyrase inhibitors20 and β-lactams21. Although cells grow as elongated filaments when septation is inhibited, these filamented cells will eventually lyse22,23 and decrease the number of viable cells as seen in Figure 3b. Without the addition of nalidixic acid, both wild-type and Δ9 cells have normal morphology.

To explore the impact of the individual prophage on resistance to nalidixic acid (2 μg ml−1), strains with a single prophage deleted were tested. We determined that prophages CP4-6 and rac were primarily responsible for the enhanced resistance to nalidixic acid (33- and 41-fold, respectively; Fig. 4a).

Figure 4: Individual prophages affect cell viability with stress and biofilm formation.

Survival for the nine single-prophage deletion strains (marked with each prophage name) and the multiple prophage-deletion strain (Δ9) after challenging with (a) nalidixic acid (2 μg ml−1 for 12 h), (b) azlocillin (4 μg ml−1 for 12 h), (c) osmotic stress (6% NaCl for 12 h), (d) oxidative stress (30 mM H2O2 for 15 min), (e) acid stress (pH 2.5 for 30 min) and (f) heat stress (65 °C for 10 min). (g) Survival for the 15 single-gene deletion strains of CPS-53 (marked with each gene deletion) and the multiple prophage-deletion strain (Δ9) after challenging with oxidative stress (30 mM H2O2 for 15 min). (h) Normalized biofilm formation in 96-well polystyrene plates in M9C medium after 8 h at 30 °C. Error bars indicate s.d. values (n=4). Significant changes are marked with an asterisk for P<0.05.

Prophages increase resistance to β-lactam antibiotics

The lethality of β-lactam antibiotics stems from their interaction with transmembrane penicillin-binding proteins and the consequent disruption of cell wall integrity for fast-growing strains24. β-Lactam antibiotics, when used at sublethal concentrations, also induce an SOS response25. The PM assay showed that removing all nine prophages decreased resistance to 11 β-lactam antibiotics, including the most common penicillins and cephalosporins (four shown in Fig. 3a and nine in Supplementary Table S1), which accounted for 17 and 27% of sales in the antibacterial market in 2006, respectively14. To confirm the PM results, the MIC99 of azlocillin was also measured, and a 3.9-fold reduction in the MIC99 of Δ9 was found (4.8 μg ml−1) compared with the wild-type strain (18.6 μg ml−1). The cell viability of the wild-type strain and Δ9 were tested using 5 μg ml−1 azlocillin and 20 μg ml−1 ampicillin, and the growth of Δ9 was repressed by 146-fold (Fig. 3b) and 52-fold, respectively. Therefore, similar to its interaction with quinolones, the prophage-deleted strain is more sensitive to β-lactam antibiotics.

To identify which cryptic prophages are primarily responsible for the decreased resistance of Δ9 to azlocillin, each of the single prophage-deletion strains was tested. Deletion of prophages of rac and Qin caused lower resistance to 4 μg ml−1 azlocillin (20- and 9-fold, respectively; Fig. 4b).

Induction of prophage genes by antibiotics

To identify specific genes within the individual prophages that are affected by the quinolone and β-lactam antibiotics, a whole-transcriptome study was performed in response to subinhibitory concentrations of nalidixic acid (2 μg ml−1) and azlocillin (10 μg ml−1). For nalidixic acid, 17 prophage genes were induced >2.5-fold out of a total of 95 induced genes, and for azlocillin, 43 prophage genes were induced >2.5-fold out of a total of 168 induced genes (Supplementary Table S2).

Putative cell division inhibitor genes were induced by both nalidixic acid and azlocillin including kilR from rac, dicB, dicC and dicF from Qin, and ymfL and ymfM from e14, Lambdoid kil genes can inhibit cell division to maintain synchrony with the host in its lysogenic state26, and lambdoid prophage rac has a functional kilR gene that seems to cause cell division arrest27. DicB from Qin can rapidly cease cell division by targeting FtsZ when it is induced under stress28. In addition, lambdoid prophage e14 has a functional division inhibition gene encoded by ymfL or ymfM (ref. 29). To further study the role of these genes in response of Δ9 to azlocillin (5 μg ml−1), cell viability on deleting kilR, ymfL, ymfM, dicB and dicC were tested. Compared with the wild-type strain, deletion of dicB greatly reduced cell viability after exposure to azlocillin (82-fold), whereas deletion of dicC had no effect. Deletion of rac gene kilR also significantly reduced cell viability (fivefold), and reduced the colony size as seen for Δ9 (Fig. 3b). Deletion of ymfL and ymfM did not significantly reduce cell viability to azlocillin. Similarly for nalidixic acid (2 μg ml−1), deletion of dicB and kilR significantly reduced cell viability 4- and 35-fold, whereas the deletion of other five genes had little effect. Hence, DicB and KilR are responsible for much of the enhanced resistance to azlocillin and nalidixic acid, and these results are expected given that the rac and Qin prophages were found to be most important when the single prophage deletion strains were evaluated for their effect on antibiotic stress (Fig. 4b).

Consistent with the whole-transcriptome study, quantitative real-time reverse-transcription PCR (qRT–PCR) confirmed that kilR and dicB were both induced in cells treated with nalidixic acid (21±1- and 33±2-fold, respectively) and with azlocillin (18±1- and 35±2-fold, respectively). As for Δ9 (Fig. 3c), increased cell elongation was also observed for the kilR and dicB mutants 2 h after the addition of sublethal concentrations of nalidixic acid (2 μg ml−1) and azlocillin (5 μg ml−1). Therefore, induction of these single genes from two cryptic prophages that encode division inhibitors increases survival against quinolone and β-lactams antibiotics and affects cell division.

Prophages increase resistance to environmental stresses

Phenotype microarray PM9 is designed for testing osmotic and ion sensitivity; using this plate, we found that when exposed to a high-salt environment (for example, 6% NaCl and 6% KCl), the metabolism of Δ9 was totally inhibited, whereas the wild-type strain adapted to this stress and grew well (Fig. 3a,b, Supplementary Table S1). These results were corroborated using shake flasks in that osmotic stress (6% NaCl for 12 h) reduced the cell survival of Δ9 by 787-fold (Fig. 4c).

Similarly, we found that the growth of Δ9 was inhibited with the addition of potassium tellurite (Fig. 3a) whose toxicity in E. coli involves oxidative stress30. On the basis of this result, we tested the resistance of Δ9 to oxidative stress (30 mM H2O2 for 15 min), acid stress (pH 2.5 for 30 min), and heat (65 °C for 10 min). Removing of all nine prophages significantly decreased resistance to oxidative stress (245-fold; Fig. 4d) and acid stress (90-fold; Fig. 4e); however, there was no difference in the ability of Δ9 to withstand heat stress (Fig. 4f). Therefore, the presence of prophages dramatically improves the ability of the cell to withstand osmotic, oxidative and acid stress.

To probe the impact of the individual prophage on stress resistance, strains with a single prophage deleted were tested for sensitivity to acid, heat, osmotic stress and oxidative stress. For acid stress (Fig. 4e), removing e14, CPS-53 and CP4-57 significantly decreased resistance by 38-, 15- and 56-fold, respectively. For osmotic and heat stress (Fig. 4c,f), there was little effect of deleting each individual prophage. For oxidative stress (Fig. 4d), the absence of prophage CPS-53 alone almost accounted for all of the sensitivity of Δ9.

To determine which specific proteins of prophage CPS-53 are responsible for the increased resistance to oxidative stress, we tested all of the CPS-53 genes for their effect on oxidative stress resistance and found that deletion of yfdK, yfdO and yfdS reduced viability similar to Δ9 (Fig. 4g). The function of the proteins encoded by the CPS-53 genes is unknown. Hence, we identified specific proteins related to the change in the oxidative stress phenotype seen on deleting the nine prophages.

As RpoS is the master regulator of the stationary stress response31 and positively regulates genes necessary for the oxidative stress response such as katE32, which encodes catalase, and oxyR, which encodes a regulatory protein sensor for oxidative stress32, we tested the impact of deleting CPS-53 on the transcription of rpoS, katE and oxyR. qRT–PCR showed that transcription of rpoS, oxyR and katE was repressed (4±1-, 3±1- and 3±1-fold, respectively) in ΔCPS-53 compared with the wild-type strain when treated with 2 mM H2O2. Therefore, these results link prophage CPS-53 to RpoS and serve to explain why cells without CPS-53 have reduced viability when challenged with H2O2.

Prophages increase biofilm formation

Biofilms are the preferred lifestyle of bacteria33; therefore, we tested biofilm formation after deleting the nine cryptic prophages. In minimal medium, biofilm formation was almost completely abolished for Δ9 compared with the wild-type strain (Fig. 4h). Hence, prophages enhance the ability of E. coli to form biofilms.

To probe the impact of the individual prophage on biofilm formation, strains with a single prophage deleted were tested for biofilm formation in minimal medium. Deletion of eight prophages independently decreased early biofilm formation by 3- to 11-fold, but deletion of prophage CP4-57 increased early biofilm formation by 6±2-fold; this increase in biofilm formation on deleting CP4-57 explains the reduction in growth of planktonic cells (Fig. 2c,d). Removing prophages e14, rac and CP4-44 had the greatest impact on reducing biofilm formation (Fig. 4h). The reduction in the early biofilm formation of Δ9 is likely due to the reduced cell aggregation compared with the wild-type strain (Supplementary Fig. S1), as aggregation is directly related to biofilm formation.

As the deletion of e14 and rac affected biofilm formation to the largest extent, we examined each gene of these two prophages (47 genes) for their impact on biofilm formation and determined deletion of intE and ymfD of e14 and intR, stfR, ydaF, ydaS and ydaW of rac reduced early biofilm formation to the level seen with Δ9. These results are consistent with the results that the removal of intA encoding CP4-57 integrase and intD encoding DLP12 integrase affect early biofilm formation9. In addition, we found that ymfD and stfR are induced in mature biofilms in a temporal microarray study12.

Prophage excision

To test the stability and excision proficiency of each of the nine prophages, the fraction of cells that undergoes excision was quantified by quantitative PCR in a total of |1010 cells. The size and the position of each prophage is shown in Figure 1 and Table 1. In exponentially growing cells, seven of the nine prophages excised (Fig. 5). Prophage e14 had the highest excision rate (1–5 per 10,000 cells), and CP4-6 and rac had an excision frequency of tenfold lower (1–27 per 100,000 cells). DLP12, CPS-53, CPZ-55 and CP4-57 also excised, but with very low frequencies (<1 per 100,000 cells). In contrast, excision of Qin and CP4-44 was not detected. This is expected because the integrase for Qin (intQ) is inactive34, and CP4-44 lacks an integrase35. These results indicate these prophages are stable under exponential growth.

Figure 5: Prophage excised at different frequencies.

Proportion of wild-type cells that have the indicated prophage excised without mitomycin C (open bar), with the addition of 1 μg ml−1 of mitomycin C (grey bar) and 10 μg ml−1 of mitomycin C (black bar). Mitomycin C was added to exponential-phase cells (turbidity |1.0) in LB medium at 37 °C for 4 h. Error bars indicate s.d. values (n=3).

To test excision under adverse conditions, mitomycin C was used; this antibiotic induces the DNA repair (SOS) response in bacteria and converts lysogenic phages to the lytic form34. e14 was the only inducible prophage on mitomycin C treatment, and its excision rate increased up to 356-fold, which led to 13% of the cells losing e14 (Fig. 5). Similar results were found with an oxidative stress challenge. These results again indicate these prophages are stable except for e14.


The nine different prophages in E. coli K-12 have been captured at different stages of evolution, which is reflected by their different excision rates (Fig. 5). It seems that both Qin and CP4-44 have been enslaved by the host and trapped in the chromosome in a permanent state of lysogeny. Except for e14, the other eight prophages have lost the ability to excise on SOS response challenge, which is known to trigger active prophages to excise from the host36. Therefore, the prophages studied here are phage fossils, as they have lost the ability to excise and form phage particles, and now suffer the same fate as the host. However, rather than serving the prophages, their genes now serve the host. The beneficial impacts of the cryptic prophage genes on cell physiology include enhanced growth in rich and minimal media (Fig. 2), enhanced phosphorus and nitrogen utilization, and most importantly, the cryptic prophage genes increase the host's response to general environmental stress (for example, oxidative, acidic and osmotic stress) and to antibiotics (quinolones and β-lactams) (Figs 3 and 4).

Not surprisingly, these prophage genes are non-essential, and thus, dispensable under common culturing conditions, based on cell growth and cell respiration in the majority of the PM assays. Using plates PM 1–8 which assay nutrient utilization, only 16 out of 760 (2%) conditions inhibited the respiration of Δ9 >threefold, whereas using plates PM 9–13, which assay sensitivity to stress, 73 out of 480 (15%) conditions inhibited respiration of Δ9 >threefold.

These results agree well with those of even larger scale genome deletions (up to 15% of the genome) in E. coli K-12 MG1655, which were performed in an effort to engineer a reduced E. coli genome37,38; these deletions did not compromise essential host physiological functions under standard culturing conditions. PM assays 1–4, which test for growth differences in carbon, nitrogen, phosphorous and sulphur sources, showed MDS12 had reduced growth for 15 conditions38. In contrast, we found that Δ9 had reduced growth for five conditions and had increased growth for four conditions. The major difference between mutant MDS12 (376,183 bp removed)37,38 and Δ9 (166,481 bp removed) is that we constructed a nine prophage-deletion strain with precise removal of each prophage in a manner which mimics natural excision leaving one attachment site for each prophage, whereas MDS12, which was constructed for different aims, has deleted not only prophage DNA but also neighbouring regions37.

The precise deletions here allowed us to study the impact of the prophages without the effects of flanking host gene regions. For example, cryptic prophages Qin, CP4-44 and CPZ-55 integrate into non-regulatory intergenic regions or pseudogenes so the host is not affected. Furthermore, three of the cryptic prophages (CP4-6, DLP12 and CPS-53) integrate into tRNA genes (CP4-6, DLP12 and CPS-53) and reconstitute a functional tRNA gene after integration; hence, their removal leaves the same functional tRNA, and the host was not altered in this regard when we deleted these prophages. Prophages e14 and rac integrate into structural genes that encode isocitrate dehydrogenase and a tRNA 2-thiocytidine biosynthesis protein, respectively, by inserting a homologous sequence on integration to maintain protein activity. Natural excision of e14 and rac restores both genes to their native versions39. CP4-57 integrates into the tmRNA gene ssrA and its excision leaves a transcriptionally active ssrA with a one base pair change9; we checked the importance of SsrA by deleting ssrA and found this had no impact on the cell's response to nalidixic acid and osmotic stress. Therefore, we have constructed the first strain devoid solely of phage elements larger than a single gene to study their impact on cell physiology.

Although we cannot rule out that our deletion of the prophage genes may have altered some suppressor interactions with host genes, it seems clear, based on the specific genes we identified, that some of the phage-encoded genes are functional and are responsible for the phenotypes seen here. Different from well-studied Shiga-like toxin encoding E. coli in which toxin release relies on prophage induction40, with the exception of e14, the influence of these genes on E. coli K-12 cell physiology does not seem to rely on excision (Fig. 5); hence, there are cryptic prophage genes that confer a benefit to the host in a manner different from their expression as part of a phage that was once capable of causing cell lysis. Instead, individual genes are expressed in cryptic prophage even though the prophage on the whole is no longer active; this concept is related to the genes of active prophage that are transcribed independently of plaque formation and that were theorized to provide benefits during lysogeny10. Our work extends this concept and identifies several proteins in the cryptic prophages that benefit the host and do so in terms of stress resistance.

Other key proteins that may be related directly to the phenotypes explored here include four toxin/antitoxin (TA) systems that are located in the prophages including the well-studied RelEB41 (Qin) and three recently identified TA pairs YpjF-YfjZ (CP4-57), YkfI-YafW (CP4-6) and YeeV-YeeU (CP4-44)42. We have found the MqsR/MqsA TA system of E. coli aids in the survival against some antibiotics due to persister cell formation43. In addition, 24 cryptic prophage genes have been linked to persistence, including the relE toxin gene of Qin and the yeeV toxin gene of CP4-4444. Furthermore, we have linked TA systems to biofilm formation45. Hence, TA systems may be important here for the biofilm and general stress response phenotypes. In addition, as TA genes from bacterial prophages are actively expressed in the human gastrointestinal tract, TA systems may have a dynamic role in different ecosystems46. Indubitably, other uncharacterized genes in these cryptic prophages might also contribute to the stress response of the host, and there are probably intricate regulation mechanisms that need to be investigated.

The most striking result of this study is that cryptic phage fossils help the host cope with stress. Here, we show that cryptic prophages, instead of being passive genetic cargo of the bacterial genome, help the cell respond to various stresses as active loci. Evolutionary forces promote bacterial growth in many environmental niches, so survival under difficult conditions is crucial. Thus, it is not surprising that bacteria adapt to their environment; for example, they frequently become resistant to antimicrobial agents47. Our results suggest that phages and their resulting lysogeny may serve as an important means for bacteria to gain greater fitness. It has been theorized that the introduction of novel genes by phage can confer beneficial phenotypes that allow the exploitation of competitive environments4, and the results here support this hypothesis. Specifically, we show that the emergence of resistance to both antibiotics as well as to environmental stress arises in some cases from the acquisition of phage DNA. This suggests that inhibiting key proteins encoded by prophages may be a novel means to combat antibiotic resistance. In effect, the cell uses the tools it obtained from its former enemy, phage, to cope with new environments.


Bacterial growth and plasmids

The isogenic E. coli BW25113 K-12 strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in Table 2. For deleting and overexpressing genes, we used the Keio collection48 and the ASKA library49. All experiments were conducted at 37 °C, except for growth in M9C and for biofilm formation, which were conducted at 30 °C (to create more stress). Luria–Bertani (LB) medium50, M9 minimal medium with 0.2% casamino acids (M9C)51 and M9C with 0.1% lactate (M9C lactate) were used as indicated. Kanamycin (50 μg ml−1) was used for preculturing isogenic knockout mutants, chloramphenicol (30 μg ml−1) was used for maintaining pCA24N-based plasmids and ampicillin (100 μg ml−1) was used to maintain plasmids pKD46 and pCP20.

Construction of single prophage deletion mutants

Prophage deletion strains ΔCP4-57, ΔCPS-53, Δe14 and Δrac were obtained by overexpressing alpA, which encodes AlpA that causes excision9, torI (encodes excisionase)52, intE (encodes integrase)29 and engineered hns that induces rac prophage excision53, respectively, from pCA24N-derived plasmids49 (Table 2). This process is equivalent to natural excision and leads to a host genome devoid of both prophages and phage-like circles. To facilitate the screening of the loss of each of these prophages from the host genome, a Keio strain48 that has kanamycin resistance marker inside each prophage was used; colonies were screened for the loss of kanamycin resistance after induction of integrase or excisionase by 1 mM IPTG for 4–8 h. Complete removal of each prophage was confirmed by PCR followed by DNA sequencing using primers flanking each prophage (Supplementary Table S3); this sequencing confirmed an attachment site was retained in the host after each prophage excision, which confirmed no additional nucleotide sequences were deleted in the host.

To delete (individually) the remaining five prophages, a second approach was used in which we expanded the use of the one-step inactivation method that was originally used for single-gene deletions54. After one-step inactivation using primers flanking the prophage (Supplementary Table S3), the whole DLP12 prophage (21,302 bp) was replaced with a kanamycin resistance cassette (1.5 kbp) from plasmid pKD4. The primers were designed to keep only one attachment site (5′ site) in the E. coli host genome after each knockout, which mimics natural excision. After deleting each cryptic prophage, the kanamycin gene was removed by using the Flp recombinase sites that flank the kanamycin resistance gene; this leaves 85 bp of pKD4 next to the remaining prophage attachment site. In an analogous manner, prophages Qin (20,458 bp), CP4-6 (34,308 bp), CP4-44 (13,152 bp) and CPZ-55 (6,763 bp) were individually removed from the wild-type strain (primer pairs shown in Supplementary Table S3). The replacement of prophage with the kanamycin resistance marker and its removal were confirmed by PCR followed by DNA sequencing primers flanking the prophage sequences (Supplementary Table S3).

Removal of all nine prophages

To form a strain that is devoid of all nine cryptic prophages but that does not contain any other mutations, termed Δ9, we started with the single deletion prophage strain Δrac, then by overexpressing torI and alpA in succession, we obtained Δrac ΔCPS-53 ΔCP4-57 (Δ3) that lacks the entire rac, CPS-53 and CP4-57 prophage regions. P1 transduction55 was used next to transfer rapidly the ΔDLP12 KmR mutation to Δ3 to obtain strain Δ4. The kanamycin resistance cassette from the newly constructed multiple deletion strain Δ4 was removed by plasmid pCP20, and this strain was used as a recipient for P1 transduction to transfer ΔQin KmR. Prophage e14 was removed by overproducing IntE. CPZ-55, CP4-6 and CP4-44 were sequentially removed by P1 transduction, resulting in strains Δ7, Δ8 and, finally, strain Δ9, which lacks all nine prophages. The final full deletion strain was checked by PCR to confirm the removal of 166 kbp of prophage and prophage-like elements (3.6% of the genome) from E. coli K-12 to create the first E. coli strain solely devoid of prophages (Table 1). As expected, all 203 genes of the nine cryptic prophages in Δ9 had an expression level of zero in an E. coli GeneChip Genome 2.0 microarray (Affymetrix, P/N 4059655).

Crystal violet biofilm assay

Biofilm formation was assayed in 96-well polystyrene plates (Corning Costar) with crystal violet staining56. To remove growth effects, biofilm formation was normalized by dividing total biofilm by bacterial growth for each strain.

Growth and stress assays

Growth was determined using turbidity measurements at 600 nm with LB, M9C and M9C lactate. MIC99 values for nalidixic acid and azlocillin were determined with an initial inoculum of 5×105 cells per ml using the broth dilution method16 with the modifications of using shaking (250 r.p.m.) and LB medium. For testing the efficiency of colony formation (cell viability) under different conditions, exponential growing cells (turbidity |0.5) were diluted and cultured on LB plates with sublethal concentrations of antibiotics (nalidixic acid, ampicillin and azlocillin) as well as 6% NaCl (LB plates were used as a control). For the stress assays, H2O2, heat, acid and NaCl were added to cells growing in the early exponential stage (turbidity |0.5), and cell viability was determined by serial dilutions on LB agar plates. Cell morphology of the wild-type, Δ9, kilR and dicB strains was examined 2 h after the addition of 2 μg ml−1 nalidixic acid and 5 μg ml−1 azlocillin to exponentially growing cells (turbidity |0.5) using a Zeiss Axiovert 200 microscope (Zeiss).

Phenotype microarrays

Δ9 and the wild-type strain were assayed for differences in metabolism using microplates PM1 to PM13 from Biolog. PM1 and PM2 contain 190 alternative C-sources, PM3, 6, 7 and 8 contain 380 alternative N-sources, PM4 and PM5 contain phosphorus, sulphur and other nutrient-supplying pathways, PM9 contains tests for osmotic and ion effects, PM10 contains tests for pH effects, and PM11, 12 and 13 contain chemicals that provide information on stress and repair pathways that are active in cells57. PM technology uses the irreversible reduction of tetrazolium violet to formazan as a reporter of active metabolism57; the purple colour generated is recorded every 15 min and provides quantitative and kinetic information about the response of the cells. All procedures were performed as indicated by the manufacturer, and the data were analysed using OminoLog software. For each well, the product of the area and the average slope of the time course data were used to score cell respiration58.

RNA isolation and whole-transcriptome studies

RNA was isolated from BW25113 incubated with 2 μg ml−1 nalidixic acid, 10 μg ml−1 azlocillin or no antibiotic after 90 min (antibiotics added when the turbidity was ~0.8). As the antibiotic concentrations used were below the MIC values, growth (as indicated by the turbidity) was comparable with and without antibiotics. Total RNA was isolated using a bead beater (Biospec) and was converted into cDNAs through a reverse transcription reaction with poly(A) RNA controls59. The cDNAs were then digested with DNase I (Amersham Biosciences) to produce 50- to 200-bp fragments, the fragmented cDNAs were labelled with biotin, and the labelled cDNAs were hybridized at 45 °C for 16 h to the E. coli GeneChip Genome 2.0 array (Affymetrix, P/N 511302)5959. The gene expression data are accessible through GEO accession number GSE23359.

Quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR)

To determine the prophage excision rate, the number of chromosomes that are devoid of each prophage was quantified using primers flanking each prophage (Supplementary Table S3), which only give PCR products when the prophage is removed because of the size of the prophage (Table 1). The relative amount of each target gene was determined using reference gene purA. Total DNA (50–200 ng) was isolated using an UltraClean Microbial DNA Isolation Kit (Mo Bio Laboratories) and used as the template for the qPCR reaction using the SuperScript III Platinum SYBR Green One-Step qRT–PCR Kit (Invitrogen). The reaction and analysis was conducted using the StepOne Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems).

Quantitative real-time reverse-transcription PCR

Different from the qPCR described above, which determined the relative concentrations of specific DNA fragments, qRT-PCR was used to quantify relative RNA concentrations using 50 ng as a template and included a complementary DNA synthesis step from RNA before the denaturation step. Primers for qRT-PCR for kilR, dicB, rpoS, oxyR and katE are listed in Supplementary Table S3. The housekeeping gene rrsG (16S rRNA gene) was used to normalize the gene expression data.

Additional information

How to cite this article: Wang, X. et al. Cryptic prophages help bacteria cope with adverse environments. Nat. Commun. 1:147 doi: 10.1038/ncomms1146 (2010).


  1. 1

    Lwoff, A. Interaction among virus, cell, and organism. Science 152, 1216–1220 (1966).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Casjens, S. Prophages and bacterial genomics: what have we learned so far? Mol. Microbiol. 49, 277–300 (2003).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Edlin, G., Lin, L. & Bitner, R. Reproductive fitness of P1, P2, and Mu lysogens of Escherichia coli. J. Virol. 21, 560–564 (1977).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Canchaya, C., Proux, C., Fournous, G., Bruttin, A. & Brüssow, H. Prophage genomics. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 67, 238–276 (2003).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Lawrence, J. G. & Ochman, H. Molecular archaeology of the Escherichia coli genome. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95, 9413–9417 (1998).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Perna, N. T. et al. Genome sequence of enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7. Nature 409, 529–533 (2001).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Barondess, J. J. & Beckwfth, J. A bacterial virulence determinant encoded by lysogenic coliphage lambda. Nature 346, 871–874 (1990).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Edlin, G., Lin, L. & Kudmar, R. λ Lysogens of E. coli reproduce more rapidly than non-lysogens. Nature 255, 735–737 (1975).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Wang, X., Kim, Y. & Wood, T. K. Control and benefits of CP4-57 prophage excision in Escherichia coli biofilms. ISME J. 3, 1164–1179 (2009).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Brüssow, H., Canchaya, C. & Hardt, W.- D. Phages and the evolution of bacterial pathogens: from genomic rearrangements to lysogenic conversion. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 68, 560–602 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Bossi, L., Fuentes, J. A., Mora, G. & Figueroa-Bossi, N. Prophage contribution to bacterial population dynamics. J. Bacteriol. 185, 6467–6471 (2003).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Domka, J., Lee, J. & Wood, T. K. Temporal gene-expression in Escherichia coli K-12 biofilms. Environ. Microbiol. 9, 322–346 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Bochner, B. R. Sleuthing out bacterial identities. Nature 339, 157–158 (1989).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Kresse, H., Belsey, M. J. & Rovini, H. The antibacterial drugs market. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 6, 19–20 (2007).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Han, X. et al. Escherichia coli genes that reduce the lethal effects of stress. BMC Microbiol. 10, 35 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Wiegand, I., Hilpert, K. & Hancock, R. E. W. Agar and broth dilution methods to determine the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of antimicrobial substances. Nat. Protocols 3, 163–175 (2008).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Sharpe, M. E. & Errington, J. Postseptational chromosome partitioning in bacteria. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 92, 8630–8634 (1995).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Dörr, T., Lewis, K. & Vulić, M. SOS response induces persistence to fluoroquinolones in Escherichia coli. PLoS Genet. 5, e1000760 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Jones, C. & Holland, I. B. Role of the SulB (FtsZ) protein in division inhibition during the SOS response in Escherichia coli: FtsZ stabilizes the inhibitor SulA in maxicells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 82, 6045–6049 (1985).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Fairweather, N. F., Orr, E. & Holland, I. B. Inhibition of deoxyribonucleic acid gyrase: effects on nucleic acid synthesis and cell division in Escherichia coli K-12. J. Bacteriol. 142, 153–161 (1980).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Gardner, A. D. Morphological effects of pencillin on bacteria. Nature 146, 837–838 (1940).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Rolinson, G. N. Effect of β-lactam antibiotics on bacterial cell growth rate. J. Gen. Microbiol. 120, 317–323 (1980).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Rolinson, G. N. Forty years of beta-lactam research. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 41, 589–603 (1998).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Tuomanen, E., Cozens, R., Tosch, W., Zak, O. & Tomasz, A. The rate of killing of Escherichia coli by beta-lactam antibiotics is strictly proportional to the rate of bacterial growth. J. Gen. Microbiol. 132, 1297–1304 (1986).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Miller, C. et al. SOS response induction by beta-lactams and bacterial defense against antibiotic lethality. Science 305, 1629–1631 (2004).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Sergueev, K., Court, D., Reaves, L. & Austin, S. E. coli cell-cycle regulation by bacteriophage lambda. J. Mol. Biol. 324, 297–307 (2002).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Conter, A., Bouche, J. P. & Dassain, M. Identification of a new inhibitor of essential division gene ftsZ as the kil gene of defective prophage Rac. J. Bacteriol. 178, 5100–5104 (1996).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Cam, K., Bejar, S., Gil, D. & Bouche, J.- P. Identification and sequence of gene dicB: translation of the division inhibitor from an in-phase internal start. Nucl. Acids Res. 16, 6327–6338 (1988).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Mehta, P., Casjens, S. & Krishnaswamy, S. Analysis of the lambdoid prophage element e14 in the E. coli K-12 genome. BMC Microbiol. 4, 4 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30

    Pérez, J. M. et al. Bacterial toxicity of potassium tellurite: unveiling an ancient enigma. PLoS ONE 2, e211 (2007).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31

    Pesavento, C. et al. Inverse regulatory coordination of motility and curli-mediated adhesion in Escherichia coli. Genes Dev. 22, 2434–2446 (2008).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. 32

    Lacour, S. & Landini, P. σs-Dependent gene expression at the onset of stationary phase in Escherichia coli: function of σs-dependent genes and identification of their promoter sequences. J. Bacteriol. 186, 7186–7195 (2004).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33

    Watnick, P. & Kolter, R. Biofilm, city of microbes. J. Bacteriol. 182, 2675–2679 (2000).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. 34

    Asadulghani, M. et al. The defective prophage pool of Escherichia coli O157: prophage-prophage interactions potentiate horizontal transfer of virulence determinants. PLoS Pathog. 5, e1000408 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. 35

    Blattner, F. R. et al. The complete genome sequence of Escherichia coli K-12. Science 277, 1453–1462 (1997).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36

    Waldor, M. K. & Friedman, D. I. Phage regulatory circuits and virulence gene expression. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 8, 459–465 (2005).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37

    Kolisnychenko, V. et al. Engineering a reduced Escherichia coli genome. Genome Res. 12, 640–647 (2002).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. 38

    Posfai, G. et al. Emergent properties of reduced-genome Escherichia coli. Science 312, 1044–1046 (2006).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39

    Hill, C. W., Gray, J. A. & Brody, H. Use of the isocitrate dehydrogenase structural gene for attachment of e14 in Escherichia coli K-12. J. Bacteriol. 171, 4083–4084 (1989).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. 40

    Livny, J. & Friedman, D. I. Characterizing spontaneous induction of Stx encoding phages using a selectable reporter system. Mol. Microbiol. 51, 1691–1704 (2004).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41

    Pedersen, K. et al. The bacterial toxin RelE displays codon-specific cleavage of mRNAs in the ribosomal A site. Cell 112, 131–140 (2003).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42

    Brown, J. M. & Shaw, K. J. A novel family of Escherichia coli toxin-antitoxin gene pairs. J. Bacteriol. 185, 6600–6608 (2003).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. 43

    Kim, Y. & Wood, T. K. Toxins Hha and CspD and small RNA regulator Hfq are involved in persister cell formation through MqsR in Escherichia coli. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 391, 209–213 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. 44

    Shah, D. et al. Persisters: a distinct physiological state of E. coli. BMC Microbiol. 6, 53 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. 45

    Kim, Y., Wang, X., Ma, Q., Zhang, X.- S. & Wood, T. K. Toxin-antitoxin systems in Escherichia coli influence biofilm formation through YjgK (TabA) and fimbriae. J. Bacteriol. 191, 1258–1267 (2009).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46

    Reyes, A. et al. Viruses in the faecal microbiota of monozygotic twins and their mothers. Nature 466, 334–338 (2010).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. 47

    Alanis, A. J. Resistance to antibiotics: are we in the post-antibiotic era? Arch. Med. Res. 36, 697–705 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. 48

    Baba, T. et al. Construction of Escherichia coli K-12 in-frame, single-gene knockout mutants: the Keio collection. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2, 0008 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. 49

    Kitagawa, M. et al. Complete set of ORF clones of Escherichia coli ASKA library (a complete set of E. coli K-12 ORF archive): unique resources for biological research. DNA Res. 12, 291–299 (2005).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. 50

    Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F. & Maniatis, T. Molecular Cloning, a Laboratory Manual 2nd edn (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 1989).

  51. 51

    Rodriguez, R. L. & Tait, R. C. Recombinant DNA Techniques: an Introduction (Benjamin/Cummings Publishing, 1983).

  52. 52

    Panis, G., Mejean, V. & Ansaldi, M. Control and regulation of KplE1 prophage site-specific recombination: a new recombination module analyzed. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 21798–21809 (2007).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. 53

    Hong, S. H., Wang, X. & Wood, T. K. Controlling biofilm formation, prophage excision and cell death by rewiring global regulator H-NS of Escherichia coli. Microb. Biotechnol. 3, 344–356 (2010).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. 54

    Datsenko, K. A. & Wanner, B. L. One-step inactivation of chromosomal genes in Escherichia coli K-12 using PCR products. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 6640–6645 (2000).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. 55

    Maeda, T., Sanchez-Torres, V. & Wood, T. K. Metabolic engineering to enhance bacterial hydrogen production. Microb. Biotechnol. 1, 30–39 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. 56

    Fletcher, M. The effects of culture concentration and age, time, and temperature on bacterial attachment to polystyrene. Can. J. Microbiol. 23, 1–6 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57

    Bochner, B. R. Global phenotypic characterization of bacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 33, 191–205 (2009).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. 58

    Biondi, E. G. et al. Metabolic capacity of Sinorhizobium (Ensifer) meliloti strains as determined by Phenotype MicroArray analysis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75, 5396–5404 (2009).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. 59

    González Barrios, A. F. et al. Autoinducer 2 controls biofilm formation in Escherichia coli through a novel motility quorum-sensing regulator (MqsR, B3022). J. Bacteriol. 188, 305–316 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references


This work was supported by the NIH. We are grateful for the Keio and ASKA strains provided by the Genome Analysis Project in Japan. We thank Dr Barry R. Bochner from Biolog for providing plate information and Dr Ryland Young for his critical review of this manuscript. T.K.W. is the T. Michael O'Connor II Endowed Chair and Professor at Texas A & M University.

Author information




T.K.W. and X.W. designed the study, analysed the data and wrote the paper. X.W. constructed the strains, X.W., Y.H.K., Q.M. and S.H.H. performed the assays, and X.W., K.P. and J.M.S. conducted and analysed the phenotype microarray data. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas K. Wood.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figure S1 and Supplementary Tables S1-S3 (PDF 179 kb)

Rights and permissions

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, X., Kim, Y., Ma, Q. et al. Cryptic prophages help bacteria cope with adverse environments. Nat Commun 1, 147 (2010).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing