Abstract
Density functional theory (DFT) is widely applied in calculations of molecules and materials. Yet, it suffers from a wellknown overemphasis on charge delocalization arising from selfinteraction error that destabilizes localized states. Here, using the symmetric diamine N,N′dimethylpiperazine as a model, we have experimentally determined the relative energy of a state with positive charge localized on one of the two nitrogen atoms, and a state with positive charge delocalized over both nitrogen atoms. The chargelocalized state was found to be 0.33 (0.04) eV higher in energy than the chargedelocalized state. This provides an important test of theoretical approaches to electronic structure calculations. Calculations with all DFT functionals commonly used today, including hybrid functionals with exact exchange, fail to predict a stable chargelocalized state. However, the application of an explicit selfinteraction correction to a semilocal functional identifies both states and gives relative energy in excellent agreement with both experiment and CCSD(T) calculations.
Introduction
Charge transfer (CT) between two or more charge centres and charge delocalization across separate parts of a molecular system are of great importance in many areas of chemistry as they often define molecular structure and reactivity^{1,2,3}. Their relevance further extends to biological polymers such as DNA and to lightharvesting processes using artificial photosynthesis^{3,4,5,6,7}. Localized electronic states and separation of charges are, furthermore, an important aspect of semiconductor devices and solar cells^{8,9,10,11,12}. Yet, the calculation of charge localization and charge delocalization is challenging, especially for computational methods that are applicable to extended systems.
The commonly used Kohn–Sham density functional theory (DFT) functionals are known to suffer from bias towards delocalized states because of selfinteraction error^{13,14,15}. Hartree–Fock (HF), on the other hand, is overly biased towards localized states. Hybrid functionals that mix the two approaches are widely used in all branches of chemistry and are increasingly used in condensed matter calculations, but the balance between localized and delocalized states depends strongly on the proportions used in the mixing. This mixing ratio is sometimes treated as an empirical, systemdependent parameter. A more fundamental, parameterfree approach is, however, needed to accurately predict the delicate balance between localized and delocalized electronic states, especially in extended systems. Over 30 years ago, an explicit selfinteraction correction approach was proposed by Perdew and Zunger (PZSIC)^{16}. Although it was applied early on in studies of the electronic structure of molecules (see, for example, ref. 17), it has not become a commonly used approach. A variational, selfconsistent implementation of this PZSIC using complex valued orbitals has recently been applied successfully in studies of molecules and solids, including Rydberg excited states^{18,19,20}. A discussion of the selfinteraction error and our implementation of PZSIC can be found in Supplementary Note 1. We show here that although all the commonly used DFT functionals, including hybrid functionals, fail to produce the localized charge state of the system studied, calculations using PZSIC give results in excellent agreement with the experimentally determined relative energy of a localized and delocalized electronic state.
To achieve this comparison, experimental benchmarks for chargelocalized and chargedelocalized states are required. This is challenging because in most cases electronic systems exhibit just one particular charge distribution, making comparison between states with different charge distributions difficult. In a recent study, however, we have found that in N,N’dimethylpiperazine (DMP), both a chargelocalized state and a chargedelocalized state can be observed^{21}. DMP has previously served as a prototype for exploring electron lone pair interactions and CT between nitrogen atoms^{22,23,24}. In its cationic state, the positive charge can be localized on one of the nitrogen atoms (DMPL^{+}), or delocalized over the two equivalent nitrogen atoms (DMPD^{+}). The chargelocalized ion DMPL^{+}, however, has not been observed until the recent ultrafast timeresolved experiment^{21}. It is possible to identify the different charge states because they have distinct spectral and temporal signatures. Upon optical excitation, the chargelocalized state is initially generated. A subsequent CT then leads to the chargedelocalized state. This discovery of two states with distinct charge distributions has now laid the foundation for an experimental approach for measuring their relative energy. The approach is based on photoionization from Rydberg states, whose binding energies have been found to be remarkably dependent on the nuclear arrangements and the charge distribution of the molecular ion core. Further, the Rydberg electronbinding energy is independent of a molecule’s internal energy, making it ideally suited for the exploration of highenergy charge states that are populated when the molecules are highly energized^{25,26,27,28}. Because the Rydberg electron has a small effect on the bonding and molecular structure, the configuration of the molecular ion cores of Rydberg states closely resemble those of the cationic states. The binding energies of the Rydberg states, therefore, yield information about the chargelocalized and chargedelocalized cationic states.
The relative energy of a chargelocalized state and a chargedelocalized state of a given molecule has not been determined previously, as far as we know, even though it is a critically important parameter for calibrating theoretical approaches. In the current study, the relative energy was determined using a newly devised experimental approach that takes advantage of an equilibrium established on a picosecond time scale upon excitation to the Rydberg states. Calculations using conventional DFT, selfinteractioncorrected DFT and ab initio methods were tested against the experimental measurements. We aim to evaluate the capability of each method to properly describe the charge localization and delocalization in the ground electronic state of the molecular cation.
Results
Experimental determination of the relative energy
To measure the energy of the cationic state, we first experimentally determined the relative energy of 3sD and 3sL Rydberg states with the chargedelocalized ion core DMPD^{+} and the chargelocalized ion core DMPL^{+}, respectively, by measuring the equilibrium composition of the Rydberg states as a function of the excitation energy. As shown in Supplementary Fig. 1, because the binding energy, that is, the energy difference between the cationic state and the Rydberg state, is measured in the experiment, the relative energy of the cationic states is known once the relative energy of the 3s Rydberg states is known. DMP was excited from its ground state to the 3p or the 3s Rydberg state using pump photons with wavelengths tuned in the range of 193.0–240.8 nm. The probe photon monitored the timedependent dynamics by ionizing the Rydbergexcited molecules. The kinetic energy of the ejected photoelectrons was measured to determine the binding energy of the Rydberg states. The 3p state, which was reached with the shorter wavelengths, decayed by internal conversion into 3s within several hundred femtoseconds. Details of the experimental setup and parameters are given in Supplementary Note 2. As we have shown previously, upon optical excitation to the localized charge state, an equilibrium between the localized and delocalized states is reached after several picoseconds^{21}.
The complete set of the timeresolved photoelectron spectra at several pump wavelengths are given in Supplementary Fig. 2. Because the energy is conserved in internal conversion, pump photons of different wavelengths deposit different amounts of energy into the vibrational manifolds. For pump wavelengths between 193.0 and 240.8 nm, the molecule has effective vibrational temperature between 565 and 980 K after relaxation, assuming the energy is distributed across all vibrational modes. The detailed calculation of the effective temperature is discussed in the Supplementary Note 6.
Two 3s peaks (Fig. 1), located at 2.70 (0.03) eV and at 2.81 (0.04) eV, are assigned to 3sD and 3sL, respectively^{21}. The 3sL dominates at short delay times (Fig. 1a,b), whereas 3sD dominates at longer delay times (Fig. 1a,c,d), indicating an early population in 3sL and a lower energy for 3sD. As the temperature decreases from 980 to 565 K with the pump wavelength increasing from 193.0 nm to 240.8 nm, the intensity of 3sL decreases almost to the baseline in the spectra with the molecules at equilibrium (Fig. 1d)
Because the change of the Gibbs free energy (ΔG) scales linearly with the natural logarithm of the equilibrium constant (K), the enthalpy (ΔH) and entropy (ΔS) change in the transition can be determined from the logarithm of the equilibrium constant as a function of inverse temperature:
where R is the gas constant and T is the temperature.
The spectra at each point in time were fitted using two Lorentzians with variable peak centres to derive the equilibrium constants in the 3s states, as described in Supplementary Notes 4 and 5. Details of the fits are shown in Supplementary Notes 4 and 5, Supplementary Figs 3 and 4 and Supplementary Tables 1 and 2. The results are shown in Fig. 2. The logarithm of the equilibrium constant is indeed found to depend approximately linearly on the estimated reciprocal temperature. A fit using equation (1) gives −20.9 (3.7) kJ mol^{−1} or −0.22 (0.04) eV and −17.7 (4.6) J K^{−1} mol^{−1} for ΔH and ΔS of the transition from 3sL to 3sD. Because the binding energy difference between 3sL and 3sD is 0.11 (0.01) eV, the energy of the DMPL^{+} ion is determined to be 0.33 (0.04) eV higher than that of the DMPD^{+} ion. A schematic cut through the energy surface, deduced from these measurements, is shown in Fig. 1e.
Test of theoretical methods
The ability of various theoretical approaches to describe the charge localized and delocalized states can now be assessed by comparison with these experimental results. First, calculations were carried out to determine the optimal molecular geometries of the two states. The DMPL^{+} and DMPD^{+} ion structures were optimized with the Gaussian 09 (refs 29, 30) and NWChem software^{31} at various levels of theory including HF, MP2 (Møller–Plesset perturbation theory, truncated at the second order), DFT with all the commonly used functionals (complete list available in Supplementary Note 2), and CCSD (coupled cluster method with single and double excitations). Unless specified otherwise, the augccpVDZ basis set was used in the Rydberg state calculations and the ccpVTZ basis set in the cation calculations^{32,33}. The cation structures were also optimized using PZSIC with the GPAW software^{34,35,36}, where a real space grid over a cubic simulation cell of 20 Å side length and 0.13 Å mesh was used. The PZSIC was applied to the PBE semilocal functional. Although in the neutral molecule each nitrogen atom assumes a pyramidal structure with the methyl group in equatorial position, the nitrogen becomes pseudoaxial and pseudoplanar in the cation. The Cartesian coordinates of selected optimized structures are listed in Supplementary Tables 4 and 5.
DFT calculations with any one of the available hybrid functionals implemented in the Gaussian 09 software failed to provide a stable localized state, except for the BHandHLYP functional that has previously been found to describe CT interactions well^{37} while giving generally poor results for other molecular properties such as total energy (and therefore not commonly used)^{38}. When DFT calculations were started from MP2 or HFoptimized structures for the localized state, the minimization of the energy resulted in a conversion to the charge delocalized state. Most surprisingly, the M06HF functional, which contains 100% HF exchange and is therefore widely deemed to be particularly appropriate for CT^{39,40,41}, also fails to localize the charge in this case. However, the PZSIC calculation gives a stable localized state with similar structure as that obtained from MP2 and CCSD. The bond lengths are typically 0.02–0.04 Å shorter than those obtained from MP2 and CCSD. The minimum energy path between the two states calculated using the nudged elastic band method^{42} and the PZSIC as well as the M06HF functional is shown in Fig. 3. An energy barrier of 0.2 eV for the transition from the localized to the delocalized state is obtained with PZSIC, whereas no barrier is obtained in the M06HF calculations.
Table 1 lists the calculated energy difference between the optimized DMPL^{+} and DMPD^{+} structures obtained using HF, MP2, CCSD, DFT with selected functionals and PZSIC. CCSD(T) calculations were carried out to obtain the singlepoint energy for each one of these structures. Although calculations using HF, MP2 and CCSD produce both the DMPL^{+} and the DMPD^{+} states, the relative energy of these states is poorly estimated, especially by HF, which gives lower energy for the localized state than the delocalized state. Singlepoint CCSD(T) calculations using the MP2 or CCSD geometries give a relative energy in good agreement with the experimental measurements. The PZSIC calculation also yields a relative energy that is close to the experimental results, see Table 1 and Supplementary Table 3. Supplementary Note 7 also reports a satisfactory agreement of the experimental and computed entropy differences.
The close agreement between the relative energy obtained from the highlevel CCSD(T) calculations and the experimental results confirms the validity of the interpretation of the experimental data. To further cement the correspondence of experimental and computational results, we have calculated the Rydberg electronbinding energy with the optimized DMPL^{+} and DMPD^{+} structures using the equation of motion CCSD. For comparison, the binding energy was also calculated using PZSIC, which has previously been shown to give good estimates of Rydberg binding energy of both molecules and molecular clusters^{18,27,28,43}. The total energy of the Rydberg excited states using PZSIC was obtained using the delta selfconsistent field method^{44} and the binding energy obtained by subtracting the total energy of the excited state from that of the ion. As listed in Table 2, the calculated binding energy is in good agreement with the experimentally measured values for both the DMPL^{+} and DMPD^{+} structures, supporting the assignment of the observed spectroscopic features.
The Rydberg orbitals and the associated spin densities are shown in Fig. 4. The 3sL Rydberg orbital (Fig. 4a) anchors on the planar nitrogen, whereas the 3sD Rydberg orbital (Fig. 4b) is centred symmetrically between the two nitrogen atoms. Both orbitals are extended and comprise the whole molecule, as expected. The spin densities (shown in Fig. 3c,d), which were generated by subtracting the spindown density from the spinup density, illustrate the charge distributions of the localized and delocalized cations. The charge is localized on the planar nitrogen in the DMPL^{+} (Fig. 3c) but delocalized between the two nitrogen atoms in DMPD^{+} (Fig. 3d). Intriguingly, there is also net spin density between the two intermediate Catoms, indicating a throughbondinteraction^{22} in the chargedelocalized ion.
Discussion
The present study advances experimentally the stateoftheart in exploring charge localization and delocalization in systems with multiple charge centres. The wavelengthdependent Rydberg electronbinding energy spectroscopy enables us to experimentally determine the energy and entropy change of the CT reaction. It is the experimental tool of choice to probe the CT process in the presence of large vibrational energy, as is needed to observe the higherenergy state before CT. Indeed, previous timeresolved spectroscopic studies on DMP radical cations prepared by a photoinduced electron transfer technique only observed the DMPD^{+} ion^{23,24} possibly because of the low temperature in the system. Together with the binding energy information obtained from the spectra, the present experiment creates an important benchmark to evaluate various theoretical approaches.
The MP2 and CCSD methods are found to give good estimates of the molecular structure as the singlepoint CCSD(T) calculation gives good agreement with the experimental binding energies of the 3sL and 3sD states as well as the relative energy of the two cation states. The computational effort of these methods, however, scales unfavourably with system size and they are thus limited to small systems. The computational effort of DFT calculations increases slower with size as N^{3}, where N is the number of electrons, and is the only viable approach for many problems involving large molecules and condensed phase systems. Conventional DFT functionals are, however, found here not to predict the metastable localized state of DMP. The explicit inclusion of the selfinteraction correction, as proposed by Perdew and Zunger, implemented in a variational and selfconsistent way with complexvalued orbitals, can remedy these shortcomings of the DFT approach. The PZSIC calculations give similar results for the binding energies of the 3sL and 3sD states as the equation of motion CCSD calculations and for the relative energies of the DMPL^{+} and DMPD^{+} states as the CCSD(T) calculations. The computational effort in this approach is larger than conventional DFT but still scales with size as N^{3}. These results are expected to guide future improvements to energy functionals describing electronic systems.
Additional information
How to cite this article: Cheng, X. et al. Charge localization in a diamine cation provides a test of energy functionals and selfinteraction correction. Nat. Commun. 7:11013 doi: 10.1038/ncomms11013 (2016).
References
Gaillard, E. R. & Whitten, D. G. Photoinduced electron transfer bond fragmentations. Acc. Chem. Res. 29, 292–297 (1996).
Newton, M. D. Quantum chemical probes of electrontransfer kinetics  the nature of donoracceptor interactions. Chem. Rev. 91, 767–792 (1991).
Zewail, A. H. Femtochemistry: atomicscale dynamics of the chemical bond using ultrafast lasers  (Nobel lecture). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 39, 2587–2631 (2000).
Moser, C. C., Keske, J. M., Warncke, K., Farid, R. S. & Dutton, P. L. Nature of biological electron transfer. Nature 355, 796–802 (1992).
Sanii, L. & Schuster, G. B. Longdistance charge transport in DNA: Sequencedependent radical cation injection efficiency. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 122, 11545–11546 (2000).
Barnett, R. N., Cleveland, C. L., Joy, A., Landman, U. & Schuster, G. B. Charge migration in DNA: iongated transport. Science 294, 567–571 (2001).
Frischmann, P. D., Mahata, K. & Wurthner, F. Powering the future of molecular artificial photosynthesis with lightharvesting metallosupramolecular dye assemblies. Chem. Soc. Rev. 42, 1847–1870 (2013).
Ge, N. H. et al. Femtosecond dynamics of electron localization at interfaces. Science 279, 202–205 (1998).
Yeh, A. T., Shank, C. V. & McCusker, J. K. Ultrafast electron localization dynamics following photoinduced charge transfer. Science 289, 935–938 (2000).
Bakulin, A. A. et al. The role of driving energy and delocalized States for charge separation in organic semiconductors. Science 335, 1340–1344 (2012).
Falke, S. M. et al. Coherent ultrafast charge transfer in an organic photovoltaic blend. Science 344, 1001–1005 (2014).
Najafi, E., Scarborough, T. D., Tang, J. & Zewail, A. Ultrafast dynamics. Fourdimensional imaging of carrier interface dynamics in pn junctions. Science 347, 164–167 (2015).
Cohen, A. J., MoriSanchez, P. & Yang, W. T. Insights into current limitations of density functional theory. Science 321, 792–794 (2008).
Jónsson, H. Simulation of surface processes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 944–949 (2011).
Baruah, T. & Pederson, M. R. Density functional study on a lightharvesting carotenoidporphyrinC60 molecular triad. J. Chem. Phys. 125, 164706 (2006).
Perdew, J. P. & Zunger, A. Selfinteraction correction to densityfunctional approximations for manyelectron systems. Phys. Rev. B 23, 5048–5079 (1981).
Pederson, M. R., Heaton, R. A. & Lin, C. C. Local‐density HartreeFock theory of electronic states of molecules with selfinteraction correction. J. Chem. Phys. 80, 1972–1975 (1984).
Gudmundsdóttir, H., Zhang, Y., Weber, P. M. & Jónsson, H. Selfinteraction corrected density functional calculations of molecular Rydberg states. J. Chem. Phys. 139, 194102 (2013).
Lehtola, S. & Jónsson, H. Variational, Selfconsistent implementation of the PerdewZunger selfinteraction correction with complex optimal orbitals. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 10, 5324–5337 (2014)) J. Chem. Theory Comput. 11, 5052–5053 (2015).
Gudmundsdóttir, H., Jónsson, E. Ö. & Jónsson, H. Calculations of Al dopant in αquartz using a variational implementation of the PerdewZunger selfinteraction correction. N. J. Phys. 17, 083006 (2015).
Deb, S., Cheng, X. & Weber, P. M. Structural dynamics and charge transfer in electronically excited N,N'dimethylpiperazine. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 4, 2780–2784 (2013).
Hoffmann, R. Interaction of orbitals through space and through bonds. Acc. Chem. Res. 4, 1–9 (1971).
Brouwer, A. M., Langkilde, F. W., Bajdor, K. & Wilbrandt, R. Throughbond interaction in the radical cation of N,Ndimethylpiperazine. Resonance Raman spectroscopy and quantum chemical calculations. Chem. Phys. Lett. 225, 386–390 (1994).
Brouwer, A. M. et al. Radical cation of N,Ndimethylpiperazine: dramatic structural effects of orbital interactions through bonds. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 120, 3748–3757 (1998).
Gosselin, J. L. & Weber, P. M. Rydberg fingerprint spectroscopy: a new spectroscopic tool with local and global structural sensitivity. J. Phys. Chem. A 109, 4899–4904 (2005).
Kuthirummal, N. & Weber, P. M. Rydberg states: sensitive probes of molecular structure. Chem. Phys. Lett. 378, 647–653 (2003).
Cheng, X. et al. Ultrafast structural dynamics in Rydberg excited N,N,N ',N 'tetramethylethylenediamine: conformation dependent electron lone pair interaction and charge delocalization. Chem. Sci. 5, 4394–4403 (2014).
Cheng, X., Zhang, Y., Gao, Y., Jónsson, H. & Weber, P. M. Ultrafast structural pathway of charge transfer in N,N,N',N'tetramethylethylenediamine. J. Phys. Chem. A 119, 2813–2818 (2015).
Frisch, M. J. et al. Gaussian 09, Revision C.01 (Gaussian, Inc. (2009).
Frisch, M. J. et al. Gaussian 09, Revision D.01 (Gaussian, Inc. (2009).
Valiev, M. et al. NWChem: a comprehensive and scalable opensource solution for large scale molecular simulations. Comput. Phys. Commun. 181, 1477–1489 (2010).
Dunning, T. H. Gaussian basis sets for use in correlated molecular calculations. 1. The atoms boron through neon and hydrogen. J. Chem. Phys. 90, 1007–1023 (1989).
Kendall, R. A., Dunning, T. H. & Harrison, R. J. Electron affinities of the firstrow atoms revisited. Systematic basis sets and wave functions. J. Chem. Phys. 96, 6796–6806 (1992).
Mortensen, J. J., Hansen, L. B. & Jacobsen, K. W. Realspace grid implementation of the projector augmented wave method. Phys. Rev. B 71, 035109 (2005).
Enkovaara, J. et al. Electronic structure calculations with GPAW: a realspace implementation of the projector augmented wave method. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 22, 253202 (2010).
Valdes, A. et al. Solar hydrogen production with semiconductor metal oxides: new directions in experiment and theory. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 14, 49–70 (2012).
Zhao, Y. & Truhlar, D. G. Benchmark databases for nonbonded interactions and their use to test density functional theory. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 1, 415–432 (2005).
Magyar, R. J. & Tretiak, S. Dependence of spurious chargetransfer excited states on orbital exchange in TDDFT: large molecules and clusters. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 3, 976–987 (2007).
Zhao, Y. & Truhlar, D. G. Density functional for spectroscopy: no longrange selfinteraction error, good performance for Rydberg and chargetransfer states, and better performance on average than B3LYP for ground states. J. Phys. Chem. A 110, 13126–13130 (2006).
Zhao, Y. & Truhlar, D. G. The M06 suite of density functionals for main group thermochemistry, thermochemical kinetics, noncovalent interactions, excited states, and transition elements: two new functionals and systematic testing of four M06class functionals and 12 other functionals. Theor. Chem. Acc. 120, 215–241 (2008).
Zhao, Y. & Truhlar, D. G. Density functionals with broad applicability in chemistry. Acc. Chem. Res. 41, 157–167 (2008).
Jónsson, H., Mills, G. & Jacobsen, K. W . in Classical and Quantum Dynamics in Condensed Phase Simulations eds Berne B. J., Ciccotti G., Coker D. F. 385–404World Scientific (1998).
Gudmundsdóttir, H., Zhang, Y., Weber, P. M. & Jónsson, H. Selfinteraction corrected density functional calculations of Rydberg states of molecular clusters: N,Ndimethylisopropylamine. J. Chem. Phys. 141, 234308 (2014).
Gavnholt, J., Olsen, T., Engelund, M. & Schiotz, J. Delta selfconsistent field method to obtain potential energy surfaces of excited molecules on surfaces. Phys. Rev. B 78, 075441 (2008).
Acknowledgements
This project was supported by the National Science Foundation (Grant Number CBET1336105), by the DTRA (Grant Number HDTRA11410008), by the Academy of Finland through its COMP Center of excellence and FiDiPro grants (no. 263294 and 278260) and by the Icelandic Research Fund. The simulation and energy calculations of the molecular structures were conducted using computational resources and services at the Center for Computation and Visualization, Brown University, and at the Nordic High Performance Computer in Iceland.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
P.M.W. and H.J. conceived and designed the research. X.C. did the spectroscopic experiments, analysed the data and ran the MP2, CCSD, CCSD(T) and conventional DFT calculations. Y.Z. carried out the PZSIC simulations to calculate the ionic and Rydberg states. E.J. performed PZSIC calculations to optimize the ion structures and minimum energy path calculation. X.C., P.M.W. and H.J. wrote the paper, with feedbacks from all coauthors.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Figures 14, Supplementary Tables 16, Supplementary Notes 17 and Supplementary References (PDF 2787 kb)
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Cheng, X., Zhang, Y., Jónsson, E. et al. Charge localization in a diamine cation provides a test of energy functionals and selfinteraction correction. Nat Commun 7, 11013 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms11013
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms11013
This article is cited by

Reply to: “The diamine cation is not a chemical example where density functional theory fails”
Nature Communications (2018)

The diamine cation is not a chemical example where density functional theory fails
Nature Communications (2018)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.