Grain boundaries (GBs) and twin boundaries (TBs) are known to strengthen polycrystalline materials such as metals and ceramics, where GBs can impede dislocation movements, so that decreasing grains sizes can strengthen the material, the Hall–Petch relationship1,2,3,4. However, for grain sizes below some critical value, the dominant deformation mechanism becomes GBs sliding and migration so that the material strength decreases for further decreases in grain size5,6. These grain size effects have been studied extensively in metals but not in bulk nanocrystalline ceramics7,8. Dislocation migration so important in metals is absent in most ceramics, especially at low temperature, so that we can expect quite different roles of GBs and TBs in the deformation mechanisms of ceramics as compared with metals and alloys.

Nanotwins are expected to be much lower in energy than normal GBs and might strengthen materials more efficiently9. For metals, nanotwinned systems generally fail well below their theoretical strength limit because of dislocation nucleation and emission from boundaries or surface imperfections10. However, in ceramics, nanoscale twins have been observed to dramatically enhance the hardness of diamond and boron nitride11,12, inspiring our examination of the roles of nanotwinned structures on the deformation mechanism in ceramics and covalent solids.

As a prototype model system for examining how twin structures affect the mechanical response under deformation, we examined superhard boron suboxide (B6O) ceramic because B6O is capable of forming unusual profusely twinned crystals with icosahedral habits13. In addition, B6O is a promising hard material with a Vickers hardness of 45 GPa, which can be used in manufacture of cutting tools, abrasives and body armour14,15 (also quantum mechanics (QM) calculations predict a direct band gap of 3.0 eV, making it a candidate for a p-type transparent conducting oxide16). B6O has been observed experimentally to undergo brittle failure with formation of shear-induced amorphous bands17 similar to boron carbide (B4C)18,19. We previously reported QM and reactive force field molecular dynamics simulations showing that brittle failure in B4C arises from formation of higher density amorphous bands that result from fracturing the icosahedra because of reactions with the distorted C–B–C chains20,21. The intrinsic failure mechanism of B6O is not known. However, in B6O, the chains connecting the icosahedra involve two weakly coupled O atoms so that we expect that the icosahedra might not fracture under pure shear conditions22.

In this study, we use the state-of-the-art spherical aberration (Cs) corrected scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) to examine the nanoscale twins found in hot pressed B6O, showing that the TBs lie on the family planes and the angle between and planes is 72.0°±0.3°. Then we use QM at the Perdew–Burke–Ernzerhof density functional theory (DFT) level to predict the most favourable twins. We find them to be in the family plane with angles of 72.0°, in excellent agreement with our experiments. Next, we used QM to perform shear deformation along the twin plane, where we find that the maximum shear strength for shearing twinned B6O is 43.3 GPa, very close to the ideal shear strength of 43.5 GPa for single crystal B6O, and higher than values for perfect B4C (39.0 GPa)20. Finally, we performed biaxial shear deformation to mimic indentation experiments for both perfect and twinned B6O. The DFT simulations suggest that indentation conditions lead to deconstruction of the icosahedra, providing a plausible explanation for the amorphous band formation observed experimentally in B6O. We predict that the maximum shear stress is 7.5% lower for twinned B6O, and that amorphous bands might nucleate at the nanoscale twins, which are supported by experimental observations of the coordinated existence of nanoscale twins and amorphous shear bands. These results indicate that TBs play an essential role in the deformation mechanism and intrinsic brittle failure of B6O.


Perfect and nanotwinned B6O structures

The crystalline structure of B6O consists of one B12 icosahedron per rhombohedral unit cell (space group Rm), as shown in Fig. 1a, which is similar to B4C, B12P2 and α-boron22. The B12 icosahedra are connected via pseudo chains consisting of a pair of oxygen (O–O) atoms along the direction. Here each O makes B–O sigma bonds to three icosahedra, but the O–O distance of 3.07 Å is far too long for a bond. Thus, each O is formally O+, transferring one electron to a B12 icosahedron, leading to 26 skeleton electrons within the icosahedron to satisfy Wade’s rule23. Each icosahedron also makes six direct B–B sigma bonds to adjacent icosahedra. Annular bright-field STEM (ABF-STEM; Fig. 1b) shows the atomic image of perfect structure of B6O along the projection. Comparing the experimental and computer simulated ABF-STEM images (inset bottom right) reveals 12-atom boron icosahedra (B12) in the form of atomic rings with two oxygen atoms distinguishably appearing as a dark-dot contrast linking the icosahedra. This can be recognized as oxygen atomic columns positioned to be consistent with the structural model of B6O in Fig. 1a. Figure 1c shows representative nanoscale twins observed with ABF-STEM showing that the twin bands range in width from sub-nanometre to a few nanometres within the B6O grains (white lines). The TBs lie on the family planes, which agree very well with previous studies on twinned B6O and B4C (refs 13, 24, 25, 26). In addition, the ABF-STEM image and inset fast Fourier transform (FFT) pattern demonstrate clearly that the angles between and planes are 72° on both sides of the TBs, indicating symmetric twins in B6O.

Figure 1: The perfect and twinned B6O structures from QM and STEM images.
figure 1

(a) The B6O rhombohedral structure, icosahedral B12 clusters (green colour) and linked oxygen atoms (red colour). (b) The annular bright-field STEM (ABF-STEM) image showing the B12 icosahedra as atomic rings linked between two oxygen atoms along direction. The simulated ABF-STEM image of B6O is inserted at the bottom side. (c) A representative ABF-STEM image showing highly dense nanoscale twin bands within a grain and along the zone axis. Images have been smoothed and Fourier filtered to enhance the contrast of nano-twinned B6O atomic structure (see Supplementary Fig. 9). (b,c) Scale bars, 1 nm. (d) The twinned B6O structure from QM. The measured angles on both sides of the TBs are α=72.0° and β=72.0°, which are consistent agree well with the experimental values of 72.0°±0.3° as shown in FFT pattern (inset c).

To interpret the experimentally observed twinned structure in B6O, we used QM to determine the atomic geometry of the twin, leading to the results in Fig. 1d. Our QM unit cell considered total four layers of icosahedra perpendicular to the twin plane, leading to two TB planes per unit cell. We also constructed an eight-layer twinned structure to examine the multiple layer effects. These QM twin models can be compared with experimental structures having only several layers of icosahedra, as shown in Fig. 1c. The QM predicts angles on both sides of the TBs of α=72.0° and β=72.0° in excellent agreement with our experimental value of 72.0°±0.3°. Moreover, the QM predicts an interfacial energy for the TB of only −1.69 mJ m−2, which is much smaller than the stacking faults energy in most metals and ceramics (>20 mJ m−2)27,28. This low interfacial energy may explain the unusual highly twinned crystals that we found in the experimentally synthesized B6O.

Deformation mechanism of nanotwinned B6O

The existence of large numbers of nanoscale twins in B6O might be expected to dramatically change the mechanical properties, especially the strength and failure mechanism. To investigate these effects, we used QM to describe the effect of shearing the twinned supercell B6O parallel the twin plane. The computed stress–strain relationship for the twinned structure is shown in Fig. 2a and is compared with that of the perfect B6O (ref. 22). The slope of the stress–strain curve for the twinned structure is 7.5% lower than that of perfect B6O, confirming the softening effect of the TBs. The maximum shear stress is 43.3 GPa for the twinned structure, very close to our calculated ideal shear stress of 43.5 GPa (ref. 22). This indicates that the nanotwinned structure could have the theoretical strength. It is well known that B6O is anisotropic and the lower strength for twinned structure might arise from the anisotropic effects. Thus, we also sheared the perfect crystal along the (opposite direction of ) and obtained a higher maximum shear stress of 51.0 GPa because of the directional of covalent bonding in B6O. This indicates that the twinned structure has intrinsically lower strength than perfect B6O.

Figure 2: Pure shear deformation along the {} twin plane for the twinned structure compared with perfect B6O.
figure 2

(a) Stress–strain relationship. (b) Initial twin structure at 0.0 strain. The twin boundary is represented by solid black line. The B–B bond within the oval breaks in the following shear steps. (c) Structure at 0.276 strain, which corresponds to the maximum stress. The stretched B–B bonds are represented by dashed lines. (d) Structure at 0.345 strain, before the structure transformation. The donor–acceptor B–O bond is within the black oval and the forming B–O and B–B bond are within the red ovals. (e) Structure recovery to perfect crystal at 0.369 strain.

As the twinned structure is sheared, we observed that the middle layers (Fig. 2b) start to shear along the easy direction. However, the other layers shear along the opposite hard shear direction of . As the shear stress increases to its maximum at 0.276 strain, a B–B bond (black oval in Fig. 2b) between icosahedra increases from 1.72 Å in the intact structure (Fig. 2b) to 2.31 Å (Fig. 2c). To analyse the bonding, we use the electron localization function29 shown in Supplementary Fig. 1a,b, which indicates that the electron pair in the B–B covalent bond is not broken until the shear strain increases to 0.345 (Fig. 2d). After breaking the B–B bond, the icosahedra in the middle layer (indicted by the black arrowhead in Supplementary Fig. 1b) have only ten extra-cage bonds so that they do not need extra electrons from nearby O atoms to satisfy Wade’s rule. The black oval in Fig. 2d shows that the B–O bond distance increases from 1.51 to 1.64 Å, indicating that some covalent B–O bonding changes to donor–acceptor character. In the starting structure, the O is effectively O+, which like N can make three covalent bonds, leaving a lone pair pointing at the other O; but for the strained system, the O is neutral so that it can make two covalent bonds and one donor–acceptor (Lewis base–Lewis acid) bond, which get averaged over the three B–O linkages. The icosahedra near the middle layer (indicated by the red arrowhead in Supplementary Fig. 1b) now also have ten extra-cage bonds because one B–O bond becomes a donor–acceptor bond with only one broken B–B bond between icosahedra. This leads to a slight rotation of the icosahedral cluster in the middle layer, as shown in Fig. 2d. Finally, as the shear strain increases continuously to 0.369, the donor–acceptor B–O bond breaks, a new B–B covalent bond forms between the cages, and a B–O covalent cage chain bond forms (red ovals in Fig. 2d). The result is to reconstruct the perfect crystal structure, as shown in Fig. 2e.

It is of interest to determine whether structure recovery happens at finite temperature for fast strain rates. To address this issue, we performed ab initio molecular dynamics (AIMD) simulations assuming constant volume shear deformation along the same slip system at room temperature using the strain rate of 1.0 × 1010 s−1. Here we fixed the volume in the MD simulations to mimic the high strain rate deformation. The stress–strain relationship and the structural changes displayed in Supplementary Fig. 2 show that there is structure recovery. Thus, we find that the original twinned structure recovers back to twinned structure, which is different from what we find for static shear deformations where the twinned structure transforms to a perfect crystal structure. Thus, we conclude that the twinned structure will recover to itself during high strain rate shear deformations at room temperature.

To examine how the multiple layers between TBs might affect the deformation mechanism described above, we constructed the eight-layer twinned structure as shown in Supplementary Fig. 3a and applied a pure shear deformation to it. The stress–strain relationship in Fig. 2a shows that the maximum shear stress decreases from 43.3 to 41.4 GPa as the number of layers between TBs increases from 2 to 4, indicating a weakening effect because of the multiple layer structure. The structural changes for this eight-layer twinned structure under pure shear deformation are displayed in Supplementary Fig. 3b,c. As the shear strain increases to 0.254, which corresponds to the maximum shear stress, the B–B bonds between icosahedra (within the region of the easy shear direction) break, as shown in Supplementary Fig. 3b. As the shear strain increases to 0.276, the middle two layers within the easy shear region recover to the crystal structure with the direction along the hard shear direction (the other twinned region). This leads to one-layer twin structure (or stacking fault) within a new eight-layer structure, as shown in Supplementary Fig. 3c. No icosahedra break in this shear process, which is similar to the four-layer twinned and perfect B6O structures22.

Although the twinned structure has intrinsically lower strength than perfect B6O, the eight-layer twinned structure is even weaker than four-layer twinned structure. In the sheared deformation of the twinned structure, the half layer is sheared along the easy direction, whereas the other half layer is sheared along the hard shear direction of . In the four-layer twinned structure, both the two easy sheared layers are directly bonded to the two hard sheared layers, which make the TBs harder to slip than eight-layer twinned structure where only the boundary layers are bonded to hard sheared layers.

Our simulations suggest a weakening effect from TBs compared with the ideal strength of the perfect crystal. The ideal strength of single crystals is relevant only for incipient plasticity. Previous experimental studies infer the hardening effects of twins in diamond and c-BN11,12 based on the hardness measurements under conditions of fully developed plasticity. No ideal crystal exists in these conditions. Further study is required to understand the twin hardening mechanism for diamond/c-BN under experimental conditions.

The shear simulations on both twinned B6O and perfect B6O lead to structural recovery without breaking the icosahedra. This suggests a critical design element for designing ductile hard materials of boron suboxide and related materials. The key is to form donor–acceptor bonds between the icosahedra and chain structures that can break the cage–chain bonds to relax the high stress without breaking the icosahedra. This prevents amorphous band formation, leading to improved ductility of superhard ceramics.

Nano-indentation on nanotwinned B6O

To characterize the shear deformation of B6O experimentally, we carried out nano-indentation experiments on highly dense nanotwinned bulk specimens and prepared a cross-sectioned thin foil of the area beneath the indent using FIB milling. Conventional transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and STEM observations were used to examine the underlying mechanism.

Figure 3 shows the TEM and STEM images of the indentation region of B6O. The low-magnification TEM image (Fig. 3a) shows several micro-crack regions and amorphous shear bands, suggesting that severe plastic deformation and damage take place underneath the indenter. The higher magnification TEM images (Fig. 3b and Supplementary Fig. 4) indicate that the nanoscale amorphous band was formed in close proximity to and intersects numerous nanoscale twins. The amorphous band is 200–300 nm long with a 1- to 3-nm width. The nanoscale twin bands and the amorphous shear band are highlighted with black and white arrowheads in Fig. 3b–d). The atomic structure of the amorphous B6O band, viewed along the zone axis, is shown in Fig. 3c; crystalline B12 icosahedra are visible on both sides, but a loss of periodicity is evident within the 3 nm band. A high-resolution STEM image of this amorphous band is shown in Fig. 3d and indicates that amorphous B6O band formation occurs along the plane and intersects at their close proximity of observed nanoscale twin plane. In Fig. 3c,d, white dots correspond to the central positions of the B12 icosahedral clusters as suggested by image simulation30. In Fig. 3d, the amorphous band is less than 1 nm in width, as compared with 3 nm in Fig. 3c. The measured angle between the amorphous band plane and the twin plane is about 54°.

Figure 3: TEM images of the cross-sectioned indentation region.
figure 3

(a) Low-magnification TEM beneath the indentation region. Scale bar, 2 μm. (b) Magnified TEM image beneath the indented region showing a shear band (white arrowhead) in the highly dense twin grain (black arrowhead) from the projection. Scale bar, 50 nm. (c) ABF-STEM taken from the shear band reveals the loss of periodicity in a B6O grain. Inset FFT pattern demonstrate the amorphous nature of the shear band. The crystalline of B6O can be found on both sides of amorphous band. (d) ABF-STEM image at the tip of amorphous shear band (red circle) shows dissociated icosahedral clusters initiated from a twin bands. The white box is to help distinguish twin structure. (c,d) Scale bar, 2 nm.

Our previous study21 showed that the amorphous band has higher density than the crystalline region because of deconstruction of the icosahedral clusters. This leads to the severe lattice distortion in the local amorphous region that likely causes the different angles between planes compared with the intact crystal. The FFT patterns in Fig. 3d from localized region around amorphous band have angular mismatch 3° of crystals on either side of the amorphous band as compared with predicted angle. However, selected area diffraction patterns taken from large areas (few hundred nanometres) on either side of amorphous band as shown in Supplementary Fig. 4 are consistent with the theoretical angle of 72.0° of planes. These observations confirm the severe deformation of crystalline region near the amorphous band in B6O.

Deformation mechanisms under indentation

To understand the amorphous shear band formation mechanism observed in the indentation experiments, we used DFT to perform biaxial shear deformations. The stress–strain relationships under biaxial shear deformation for both twinned and perfect B6O are shown in Fig. 4a. In contrast to pure shear deformation, we calculate that the slope of the stress–strain relationship for twinned structure is 23.4% smaller than the perfect B6O, indicating that TBs under indentation induce a pronounced softening effect. The maximum shear stress for twinned B6O is 36.9 GPa, which is 8% lower than for the perfect B6O (39.9 GPa). As we discussed in the pure shear deformation, the twinned structure has intrinsically lower strength than perfect B6O because of interfacial energy from twins. This suggests that amorphous bands might nucleate at the TBs under indentation conditions. Other defects such as vacancies and GBs might also be important in the experiments on amorphous band formation.

Figure 4: Biaxial shear deformation of twinned B6O shearing along the {} twin plane to mimic an indentation experiment, which is compared with the perfect B6O.
figure 4

(a) Stress–strain relationship. (b) Structure at 0.231 strain before failure. The long axis of the most distorted and the least icosahedra are represented by black and red arrowhead, respectively. (c) Structure at 0.254 strain after failure.

Under biaxial shear conditions, we find that compression perpendicular to the TBs plays an essential role in the disintegration of icosahedra. As the shear stress reaches its maximum value of 36.9 GPa at 0.231 strain, no bonds break, as shown in Fig. 4b. Instead, the icosahedra deform to an ellipsoid shape that accommodates the applied biaxial stress. The most deformed icosahedra are in the layer that shears along the hard direction. This can be characterized by the BB distance (opposite to each other in the cage, indicated by black arrowhead in Fig. 4b), which increases from 3.39 to 3.66 Å. In contrast, this distance is 3.60 Å for the least distorted icosahedra located in the layer (red arrowhead in Fig. 4b) that is shearing along the easy direction. This deconstructs the icosahedra layers along the hard shear directions as the strain increases to 0.254, as shown in Fig. 4c.

To examine how the multiple layers between TBs affect the biaxial deformation mechanism, we applied biaxial shear deformation to the eight-layer twinned structure. The maximum shear stress for the eight-layer twinned B6O is 36.3 GPa, which is very slightly lower than the four-layer twinned structure of 36.9 GPa, as shown in Fig. 4a. The biaxial deformation mechanism for eight-layer twinned structure is similar to four-layer twinned structure where the icosahedra within the hard shear direction are disintegrated under the effects of both compression and shear, as shown in Supplementary Fig. 5.

The structural changes of perfect B6O under indentation conditions are shown in Supplementary Fig. 6a–d. As the shear stress reaches its maximum of 39.9 GPa at 0.166 strain, the icosahedra deform without breaking any bonds (Supplementary Fig. 6a). The B–B bond between icosahedra along the direction stretches from 1.70 to 1.99 Å. As the shear strain continuously increases farther to 0.231, the shear stress decreases to 31.9 GPa. The icosahedra deform to an ellipsoidal shape (Supplementary Fig. 6b), where the BB distance for the long axis along the direction (opposite to each other along the ) increases to 3.89 Å. This leads to deconstruction of icosahedra as the shear strain increases to 0.254, as shown in Supplementary Fig. 6c. Not all icosahedra in the simulation cell break. Instead, the icosahedra deconstruct along the alternative layers of planes, as shown in the rotated structure of Supplementary Fig. 6d.


Combining the experimental TEM observations with the QM-derived deformation mechanism under biaxial deformation, we propose a deformation mechanism in which the amorphous band initiates at the nanoscale twins and then it propagates along the family plane, as shown in Figs 3 and 5. The process can be described as follows. First, two layers of icosahedra along the TBs disintegrate under the indentation conditions, as shown in Fig. 5a. This appears to trigger the formation of amorphous bands that are seen in the experimental images (see, for example, Fig. 3d). Then the deconstructed icosahedra in the TB plane make it easier to form an amorphous band in the perfect B6O, as shown in Fig. 5b. The orientation of the amorphous band extends along the plane, which is not aligned along the TB plane but is consistent with the simulations of biaxial deformation of B6O described above.

Figure 5: Deformation mechanism for forming an amorphous shear band at realistic experimental conditions.
figure 5

(a) The biaxial shear deformation of four-layer nanotwins leads to deconstruction of icosahedra along the TB plane, corresponding to the red circle in Fig. 3d. (b) The biaxial shear deformation of perfect crystal leads to deconstruction of icosahedra along plane, which aligns the amorphous band propagation in Fig. 3c,d.

The transition of the amorphous band from TB plane to plane may relate to the complex stress conditions in nanoindentation experiments. Based on the above QM study, the amorphous band formed along the TB plane is under the biaxial stress conditions where the shear stress is along the TB plane and the compressive stress is perpendicular to the TB plane (Fig. 5a). As the amorphous band changes and propagates along the plane in the perfect B6O, the shear stress is still along the TB plane, whereas the compressive stress is along the direction, as shown in Fig. 5b.

Our early study17 showed that nucleation of amorphous bands is possible in the perfect crystal, but our current experimental observation suggests that they are easier to nucleation in the vicinity of twins. This finding is in good agreement with the QM calculations that find the twinned structure to have a lower maximum shear strength by 7.5% compared with perfect crystal structure.

Figure 3b shows that the amorphous bands propagate across the twin bands without obvious turning. Our QM simulations on the biaxial shear deformation of the twinned structure find deconstruction of the icosahedra only in the TBs and the hard shear region, which is consistent with the TEM images shown in Supplementary Fig. 7 (white dots correspond to the central positions of the B12 icosahedral clusters). This suggests some discontinuity might exist in the twinned structure. However, the twin bands are too narrow to observe the discontinuity in our experimental images. Our current paper focuses on the nanoscale twins in B6O and their effects to the initiation of the amorphous band formation. It will be interesting to later examine the amorphous band propagation after initiation.

The QM calculations find that the amorphous band in B6O is along that is different from B4C, which is along 18. To compare the mechanism for these two systems, we performed biaxial shear simulations on B4C perfect crystal leading to the structural changes shown in Supplementary Fig. 8. For B4C, the deconstruction of icosahedra is still along family plane because the failure of B4C arises from the interaction of the C–B–C chain with the B11C icosahedral cluster. In contrast for B6O, the C–B–C chain is replaced by two individual O atoms, which significantly changes the deformation and failure mechanism.

In this work, we identified the atomistic structure of nanoscale twins in B6O using a combination of TEM experiments and QM simulations. Then, we used QM to determine the shear deformation mechanism of twinned structures, finding that the twin can transform back to the crystalline structure. This is similar to the structural recovery in perfect B6O. These results indicate that pure shear deformation need not form an amorphous shear band for either perfect or twinned B6O.

Then, we investigated the deformation mechanism for twinned and perfect B6O under indentation conditions with QM biaxial shear simulations. Here we found that for the perfect crystal the layer deconstructs in alternate layers of family planes, with a maximum shear stress of 39.9 GPa. In contrast, for the twinned system, the amorphous band forms more easily when shear is along the twin plane, with a maximum shear stress of 36.9 GPa. Thus, it is plausible that amorphous shear bands nucleate at the nanoscale twins, which is supported by indentation experimental observation of the co-existence of nanoscale twins and amorphous shear bands.

Summarizing, we demonstrate that combining STEM nanomechanical testing with QM modelling can provide a deeper understanding of the fundamental deformation mechanisms in ceramics, which may enable the design of ductile superhard ceramics.


Computational details

All simulations were performed used the Vienna Ab-initio Simulation Package (VASP) periodic code with plane wave basis sets31,32,33. We used an energy cutoff of 600 eV in all the simulations as it gives excellent convergence on energy, force, stress and geometries. We used the projector-augmented wave pseudopotentials for the Perdew–Burke–Ernzerhof exchange-correlation functional34. The energy error for terminating electronic self-consistent field and the force criterion for the geometry optimization were set equal to 10−6 eV and 10−3 eV Å−1, respectively. The Monkhorst–Pack grid (8 × 8 × 8) in the k-space was used in the unit cell geometry optimization. Later, a smaller grid (2 × 2 × 2) and larger supercell (2 × 2 × 2) were used in the biaxial shear deformations. The Monkhorst–Pack grid (2 × 4 × 1) was used for the twinned B6O simulations.

To examine shear deformation, we imposed the strain for a particular shear plane while allowing full structure relaxation for the other five strain components35.

We mimic the indentation process by applying biaxial shear deformation. Here we considered the normal compressive pressure beneath the indenter and constrained the ratios of normal stress (σzz) to shear stress (σxz) as σzz=σzxtanΦ, where Φ=68° for a Vickers indentor36. The residual stresses after relaxing the other strain components in both shear and biaxial shear deformations were less than 0.5 GPa.

Material fabrication and nanoindentation

The fully dense B6O was synthesized using hot-pressing techniques at 2,173 K, 60 MPa for 1 h. The synthesis procedure is described in detail elsewhere37. We performed a series of indentations on the smoothly polished B6O surface at a constant loading force (2.0 N) and loading rate (14.0 mN s−1) using a dynamic ultra-microhardness tester (Shimadzu W201S) equipped with a Berkovich diamond indenter. The cross-sectional TEM specimens of the indented B6O were prepared by a lift-out technique38 using a FIB system (JEOL, JIB-4600F). Before the TEM observations, the TEM sample was further gently milled below 500 eV by a Fashone 1,040 Nanomill system to remove the damage layer on the sample surface without altering the specimen chemistry and structure.

Transmission electron microscopy

We characterized the microstructure of as-synthesized B6O using a JEM-2100 F transmission electron microscope (JEOL Ltd.) equipped with double spherical aberration correctors (CEOS GmbH) for the image- and probe-forming lens systems. The annular bright-field STEM (ABF-STEM) images acquired a detector angle of 12–23 mrad and point-to-point resolution 0.1 nm. ABF-STEM image simulations were performed using a software package of Win HREM (HREM Research Inc).

Additional information

How to cite this article: An, Q. et al. Nucleation of amorphous shear bands at nanotwins in boron suboxide. Nat. Commun. 7:11001 doi: 10.1038/ncomms11001 (2016).