Abstract
The ongoing decline of Arctic sea ice exposes the ocean to anomalous surface heat and freshwater fluxes, resulting in positive buoyancy anomalies that can affect ocean circulation. In this study, we use an optimal flux perturbation framework and comprehensive climate model simulations to estimate the sensitivity of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) to such buoyancy forcing over the Arctic and globally, and more generally to sea-ice decline. It is found that on decadal timescales, flux anomalies over the subpolar North Atlantic have the largest impact on the AMOC, while on multi-decadal timescales (longer than 20 years), flux anomalies in the Arctic become more important. These positive buoyancy anomalies spread to the North Atlantic, weakening the AMOC and its poleward heat transport. Therefore, the Arctic sea-ice decline may explain the suggested slow-down of the AMOC and the ‘Warming Hole’ persisting in the subpolar North Atlantic.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
Pantropical Indo-Atlantic temperature gradient modulates multi-decadal AMOC variability in models and observations
npj Climate and Atmospheric Science Open Access 19 October 2023
-
Arctic weather variability and connectivity
Nature Communications Open Access 18 October 2023
-
Coastal permafrost was massively eroded during the Bølling-Allerød warm period
Communications Earth & Environment Open Access 03 October 2023
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
from$1.95
to$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout






References
Parkinson, C. L. & Cavalieri, D. J. Arctic sea ice variability and trends, 1979–2006. J. Geophys. Res. 113, C07003 (2008).
Stroeve, J. et al. Arctic sea ice extent plummets in 2007. Eos 19, 1365–1387 (2008).
McCarthy, G. et al. Observed interannual variability of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation at 26.5°N. Geophys. Res. Lett. 39, L19609 (2012).
Smeed, D. A. et al. Observed decline of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation 2004 to 2012. Ocean Sci. 10, 29–38 (2014).
Jackson, L. C., Peterson, K. A., Roberts, C. D. & Wood, R. A. Recent slowing of Atlantic Overturning Circulation as a recovery from earlier strengthening. Nat. Geosci. 9, 518522 (2016).
Zhao, J. & Johns, W. Wind-forced interannual variability of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation at 26.5°N. J. Geophys. Res. 119, 2403–2419 (2014).
Buckley, M. W. & Marshall, J. Observations, inferences, and mechanisms of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation: a review. Rev. Geophys. 54, 5–63 (2016).
Rahmstorf, S. et al. Exceptional twentieth-century slowdown in Atlantic Ocean Overturning Circulation. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 475–480 (2015).
Cheng, W., Chiang, J. C. H. & Zhang, D. Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) in CMIP5 models: RCP and historical simulations. Clim. Dynam. 26, 7187–7197 (2013).
Drijfhout, S., van Oldenborgh, G. J. & Cimatoribus, A. Is a decline of AMOC causing the warming hole above the North Atlantic in observed and modeled warming patterns? J. Clim. 25, 8373–8379 (2012).
Drijfhout, S. Competition between global warming and an abrupt collapse of the AMOC in Earth’s energy imbalance. Sci. Rep. 5, 14877 (2015).
Sutton, R. W. & Hodson, D. L. R. Atlantic ocean forcing of North American and European summer climate. Science 309, 115–118 (2005).
Srokosz, M. & Bryden, H. L. Observing the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation yields a decade of inevitable surprises. Science 348, 1255575 (2015).
Robson, J., Hodson, D., Hawkins, E. & Sutton, R. Atlantic overturning in decline? Nat. Geosci. 7, 2–3 (2014).
Deshayes, J. et al. Oceanic hindcast simulations at high resolution suggest that the Atlantic MOC is bistable. Geophys. Res. Lett. 40, 3069–3073 (2013).
Heimbach, P. et al. Timescales and regions of the sensitivity of Atlantic meridional volume and heat transport: toward observing system design. Deep-Sea Res. II 58, 1858–1879 (2011).
Bugnion, V., Hill, C. & Stone, P. H. An adjoint analysis of the meridional overturning circulation in a hybrid coupled model. J. Clim. 19, 3751–3767 (2006).
Sévellec, F. & Fedorov, A. V. AMOC sensitivity to surface buoyancy fluxes: stronger ocean meridional heat transport with a weaker AMOC? Clim. Dynam. 47, 1497–1513 (2016).
Pillar, H. R., Heimbach, P., Johnson, H. L. & Marshall, D. P. Dynamical attribution of recent variability in Atlantic overturning. J. Clim. 29, 3339–3352 (2016).
Madec, G., Delecluse, P., Imbard, M. & Lévy, C. Opa 8.1 Ocean General Circulation Model Reference Manual (Technical Report, Institut Pierre-Simon Laplace, 1998).
Weaver, A. T., Vialard, J. & Anderson, D. L. T. Three- and four-dimensional variational assimilation with a general circulation model of the tropical Pacific Ocean. part 1: Formulation, internal diagnostics and consistency checks. Mon. Weath. Rev. 131, 1360–1378 (2003).
Sévellec, F. & Fedorov, A. V. The leading, interdecadal eigenmode of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation in a realistic ocean model. J. Clim. 26, 2160–2183 (2013).
Sévellec, F. & Fedorov, A. V. Optimal excitation of AMOC decadal variability: links to the subpolar ocean. Prog. Oceanogr. 132, 287–304 (2015).
Yang, Q. et al. Recent increases in Arctic freshwater flux affects Labrador Sea convection and Atlantic Overturning Circulation. Nat. Commun. 7, 20525 (2016).
IPCC Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013).
Lindsay, R., Wensnahan, M., Schweiger, A. & Zhang, J. Evaluation of seven different atmospheric reanalysis products in the Arctic. J. Clim. 27, 2588–2606 (2014).
Hurrell, J. W. et al. The Community Earth System Model: a framework for collaborative research. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 94, 1339–1360 (2013).
Böning, C. W., Behrens, E., Biastoch, A., Getzla, K. & Bamber, J. L. Emerging impact of Greenland meltwater on deepwater formation in the North Atlantic Ocean. Nat. Geosci. 9, 523–527 (2016).
Peterson, B. J. et al. Increasing river discharge to the Arctic Ocean. Science 298, 2171–2173 (2002).
Jackson, L. C. et al. Global and European climate impacts of a slowdown of the AMOC in a high resolution GCM. Clim. Dynam. 45, 3299–3316 (2015).
Boé, J., Hall, A. & Qiu, X. September sea-ice cover in the Arctic Ocean projected to vanish by 2100. Nat. Geosci. 2, 341–343 (2009).
Cavalieri, D., Parkinson, C., Gloersen, P. & Zwally, H. J. Sea Ice Concentrations from Nimbus-7 SMMR and DMSP SSM/I-SSMIS Passive Microwave Data (NASA DAAC at the National Snow and Ice Data Center, 1996).
Muir, L. C. & Fedorov, A. V. How the AMOC affects ocean temperatures on decadal to centennial timescales: the North Atlantic versus an interhemispheric seesaw. Clim. Dynam. 45, 151–160 (2015).
Dee, D. P. et al. The ERA-interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 137, 553–597 (2011).
Frajka-Williams, E. et al. Compensation between meridional flow components of the Atlantic MOC at 26°N. Ocean Sci. 12, 481–496 (2016).
Talley, L. D., Reid, J. L. & Robbins, P. E. Data-based meridional overturning streamfunctions for the global ocean. J. Clim. 16, 3213–3226 (2003).
Ganachaud, A. & Wunsch, C. Improved estimates of global ocean circulation, heat transport and mixing from hydrographic data. Nature 408, 453–457 (2000).
Lindsay, R. & Schweiger, A. Arctic sea ice thickness loss determined using subsurface, aircraft, and satellite observations. Cryosphere 9, 269–283 (2015).
Shields, C. et al. The low-resolution CCSM4. J. Clim. 25, 3993–4014 (2012).
Eisenman, I. & Wettlaufer, J. S. Nonlinear threshold behavior during the loss of Arctic sea ice. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 28–32 (2009).
Briegleb, P. & Light, B. A Delta-Eddington Multiple Scattering Parameterization for Solar Radiation in the Sea Ice Component of the Community Climate System Model Tech. Note NCAR/TN-472+STR (National Center for Atmospheric Research, 2007).
Burls, N. J. & Fedorov, A. V. What controls the mean east–west sea surface temperature gradient in the equatorial Pacific: the role of cloud albedo. J. Clim. 27, 2757–2778 (2014).
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by grant to F.S. from the Natural and Environmental Research Council UK (SMURPHS, NE/N005767/1) and by grants to A.V.F. from DOE Office of Science (DE-SC0016538) and NOAA (NA14OAR4310277). Support from the Yale University High Performance Computing facilities is also acknowledged. We thank B. Dobbins for his help with setting up numerical experiments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All three authors contributed equally to the experimental design, the data analysis, and the writing of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Information (PDF 1347 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sévellec, F., Fedorov, A. & Liu, W. Arctic sea-ice decline weakens the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation. Nature Clim Change 7, 604–610 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3353
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3353
This article is cited by
-
Evolving relationship of Nares Strait ice arches on sea ice along the Strait and the North Water, the Arctic’s most productive polynya
Scientific Reports (2023)
-
Pantropical Indo-Atlantic temperature gradient modulates multi-decadal AMOC variability in models and observations
npj Climate and Atmospheric Science (2023)
-
Coastal permafrost was massively eroded during the Bølling-Allerød warm period
Communications Earth & Environment (2023)
-
AMOC decline and recovery in a warmer climate
Scientific Reports (2023)
-
Arctic weather variability and connectivity
Nature Communications (2023)