Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Importance of the pre-industrial baseline for likelihood of exceeding Paris goals


During the Paris conference in 2015, nations of the world strengthened the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change by agreeing to holding ‘the increase in the global average temperature to well below 2 °C above pre-industrial levels and pursuing efforts to limit the temperature increase to 1.5 °C’ (ref. 1). However, ‘pre-industrial’ was not defined. Here we investigate the implications of different choices of the pre-industrial baseline on the likelihood of exceeding these two temperature thresholds. We find that for the strongest mitigation scenario RCP2.6 and a medium scenario RCP4.5, the probability of exceeding the thresholds and timing of exceedance is highly dependent on the pre-industrial baseline; for example, the probability of crossing 1.5 °C by the end of the century under RCP2.6 varies from 61% to 88% depending on how the baseline is defined. In contrast, in the scenario with no mitigation, RCP8.5, both thresholds will almost certainly be exceeded by the middle of the century with the definition of the pre-industrial baseline of less importance. Allowable carbon emissions for threshold stabilization are similarly highly dependent on the pre-industrial baseline. For stabilization at 2 °C, allowable emissions decrease by as much as 40% when earlier than nineteenth-century climates are considered as a baseline.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type



Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Historical data and future projections for global mean temperature.
Figure 2: Model-simulated difference in global mean temperature between different pre-industrial periods and 1850–1900.
Figure 3: Probability of exceeding temperature threshold for different assumed pre-industrial baselines.
Figure 4: Probability distributions for mean temperatures and time of threshold exceedance.


  1. Adoption of the Paris Agreement FCCC/CP/2015/10/Add.1 (UNFCCC, 2015).

  2. Collins, M. et al. in Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis 1029–1136 (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kirtman, B. et al. in Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis 953–1028 (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gerber, S. et al. Constraining temperature variations over the last millennium by comparing simulated and observed atmospheric CO2 . Clim. Dynam. 20, 281–299 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Schmidt, G. a. et al. Climate forcing reconstructions for use in PMIP simulations of the Last Millennium (v1.1). Geosci. Model Dev. 5, 185–191 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hawkins, E. et al. Estimating changes in global temperature since the pre-industrial period. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. (in the press).

  7. Schurer, A. P., Hegerl, G. C., Mann, M. E., Tett, S. F. B. & Phipps, S. J. Separating forced from chaotic climate variability over the past millennium. J. Clim. 26, 6954–6973 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Abram, N. J. et al. Early onset of industrial-era warming across the oceans and continents. Nature 536, 411–418 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Mann, M. E. False hope. Sci. Am. 310, 78–81 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hartmann, D. J. et al. in Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) 159–254 (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mann, M. E. et al. Proxy-based reconstructions of hemispheric and global surface temperature variations over the past two millennia. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 13252–13257 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ahmed, M. et al. Continental-scale temperature variability during the past two millennia. Nat. Geosci. 6, 339–346 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Masson-Delmotte, V. et al. in Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis 383–464 (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hasselmann, K. Stochastic climate models Part I. Theory. Tellus 28, 473–485 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Schurer, A. P., Tett, S. F. B. & Hegerl, G. C. Small influence of solar variability on climate over the past millennium. Nat. Geosci. 7, 104–108 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Taylor, K. E., Stouffer, R. J. & Meehl, G. A. An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 93, 485–498 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Cowtan, K. et al. Robust comparison of climate models with observations using blended land air and ocean sea surface temperatures. Geophys. Res. Lett. 42, 6526–6534 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Joshi, M., Hawkins, E., Sutton, R., Lowe, J. & Frame, D. Projections of when temperature change will exceed 2 °C above pre-industrial levels. Nat. Clim. Change 1, 407–412 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Cowtan, K. & Way, R. G. Coverage bias in the HadCRUT4 temperature series and its impact on recent temperature trends. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 140, 1935–1944 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hansen, J., Ruedy, R., Sato, M. & Lo, K. Global surface temperature change. Rev. Geophys. 48, RG4004 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Morice, C. P., Kennedy, J. J., Rayner, N. A. & Jones, P. D. Quantifying uncertainties in global and regional temperature change using an ensemble of observational estimates: the HadCRUT4 data set. J. Geophys. Res. 117, D08101 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hawkins, E., Sutton, R., Hawkins, E. & Sutton, R. Connecting climate model projections of global temperature change with the real world. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 97, 963–980 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Schurer, A. P., Hegerl, G. C., Mann, M. E., Tett, S. F. B. & Phipps, S. J. Separating forced from chaotic climate variability over the past millennium. J. Clim. 26, 6954–6973 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Mann, M. E., Rutherford, S., Schurer, A., Tett, S. F. B. & Fuentes, J. D. Discrepancies between the modeled and proxy-reconstructed response to volcanic forcing over the past millennium: implications and possible mechanisms. J. Geophys. Res. 118, 7617–7627 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  25. D’ Arrigo, R., Wilson, R. & Anchukaitis, K. J. Volcanic cooling signal in tree ring temperature records for the past millennium. J. Geophys. Res. 118, 9000–9010 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Carslaw, K. S. et al. Large contribution of natural aerosols to uncertainty in indirect forcing. Nature 503, 67–71 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Jones, G. S., Stott, P. A. & Mitchell, J. F. B. Uncertainties in the attribution of greenhouse gas warming and implications for climate prediction. J. Geophys. Res. 121, 6969–6992 (2016).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Stevens, B. Rethinking the lower bound on aerosol radiative forcing. J. Clim. 28, 4794–4819 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Pongratz, J., Reick, C., Raddatz, T. & Claussen, M. A reconstruction of global agricultural areas and land cover for the last millennium. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 22, GB3018 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kaplan, J. O. et al. Holocene carbon emissions as a result of anthropogenic land cover change. Holocene 21, 775–791 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Karl, T. R. et al. Possible artifacts of data biases in the recent global surface warming hiatus. Science 348, 1469–1472 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Rohde, R. et al. A new estimate of the average earth surface land temperature spanning 1753 to 2011. Geoinform. Geostat. Overv. 1, 1000101 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank K. Cowtan for making his code and results available and for help in their use and S. Phipps for CSIRO-Mk3L-1.2 model data. A.P.S., G.C.H. and S.F.B.T. were supported by the ERC-funded project TITAN (EC-320691) and A.P.S. and G.C.H. by NERC under the Belmont forum, grant PacMedy (NE/P006752/1), G.C.H. and S.F.B.T. were supported by NCAS (R8/H12/83/029) and G.C.H. was further funded by the Wolfson Foundation and the Royal Society as a Royal Society Wolfson Research Merit Award (WM130060) holder. E.H. and G.C.H. were supported by the NERC-funded SMURPHS project (NE/N006038/1) and E.H. by a NERC Fellowship (NE/I020792/1) and NCAS. M.E.M. acknowledges support for this work from the P2C2 programme of the National Science Foundation (grant ATM-1446329). We acknowledge the World Climate Research Programme’s Working Group on Coupled Modelling, which is responsible for CMIP, the climate modelling groups for producing and making available their model output, the US Department of Energy’s Program for Climate Model Diagnosis and Intercomparison, and the Global Organization for Earth System Science Portals for Earth System Science Portals. We thank F. Joos for discussion of causes of the CO2 increase since the Little Ice Age.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



A.P.S. and M.E.M. conceived the initial idea. A.P.S. performed the analysis. All authors contributed to the writing, methodology and analysis strategy.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew P. Schurer.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information (PDF 2376 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schurer, A., Mann, M., Hawkins, E. et al. Importance of the pre-industrial baseline for likelihood of exceeding Paris goals. Nature Clim Change 7, 563–567 (2017).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

This article is cited by


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing