Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Distinct global warming rates tied to multiple ocean surface temperature changes

Abstract

The globally averaged surface temperature has shown distinct multi-decadal fluctuations since 19001,2,3,4, characterized by two weak slowdowns in the mid-twentieth century and early twenty-first century and two strong accelerations in the early and late twentieth century. While the recent global warming (GW) hiatus has been particularly ascribed to the eastern Pacific cooling5,6, causes of the cooling in the mid-twentieth century and distinct intensity differences between the slowdowns and accelerations remain unclear7,8. Here, our model experiments with multiple ocean sea surface temperature (SST) forcing reveal that, although the Pacific SSTs play essential roles in the GW rates, SST changes in other basins also exert vital influences. The mid-twentieth-century cooling results from the SST cooling in the tropical Pacific and Atlantic, which is partly offset by the Southern Ocean warming. During the recent hiatus, the tropical Pacific-induced strong cooling is largely compensated by warming effects of other oceans. In contrast, during the acceleration periods, ubiquitous SST warming across all the oceans acts jointly to exaggerate the GW. Multi-model simulations with separated radiative forcing suggest diverse causes of the SST changes in multiple oceans during the GW acceleration and slowdown periods. Our results highlight the importance of multiple oceans on the multi-decadal GW rates.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Observed annual-mean globally averaged surface temperature (GST) and land surface air temperature (SAT) anomalies.
Figure 2: Observed annual-mean merged land air temperature and ocean surface temperature (MLOST) trend patterns during the two acceleration and slowdown periods.
Figure 3: Near-surface temperature trends during the two acceleration and two slowdown periods.
Figure 4: Observed and CMIP5-simulated SST trends in the global ocean and six individual ocean basins.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kosaka, Y. & Xie, S.-P. The tropical Pacific as a key pacemaker of the variable rates of global warming. Nat. Geosci. 9, 669–673 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Meehl, G. A., Hu, A., Santer, B. D. & Xie, S.-P. Contribution of the Interdecadal Pacific Oscillation to twentieth-century global surface temperature trends. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 1005–1008 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Knutson, T. R., Zhang, R. & Horowitz, L. W. Prospects for a prolonged slowdown in global warming in the early 21st century. Nat. Commun. 7, 13676 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. IPCC: Summary for Policymakers. In Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013).

  5. Meehl, G. A., Arblaster, J. M., Fasullo, J. T., Hu, A. & Trenberth, K. E. Model-based evidence of deep-ocean heat uptake during surface-temperature hiatus periods. Nat. Clim. Change 1, 360–364 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kosaka, Y. & Xie, S.-P. Recent global-warming hiatus tied to equatorial Pacific surface cooling. Nature 501, 403–407 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Clement, A. & DiNezio, P. The tropical Pacific ocean—back in the driver’s seat? Science 343, 976–978 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Fyfe, J. C. et al. Making sense of the early-2000s warming slowdown. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 224–228 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hulme, M. 1.5 °C and climate research after the Paris Agreement. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 222–224 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hartmann, D. et al. in Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) 159–254 (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dai, A., Fyfe, J. C., Xie, S.-P. & Dai, X. Decadal modulation of global surface temperature by internal climate variability. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 555–559 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Watanabe, M. et al. Contribution of natural decadal variability to global warming acceleration and hiatus. Nat. Clim. Change 4, 893–897 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Santer, B. et al. Separating signal and noise in atmospheric temperature changes: the importance of timescale. J. Geophys. Res. 116, D22105 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Karl, T. R. et al. Possible artifacts of data biases in the recent global surface warming hiatus. Science 348, 1469–1472 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Bindoff, N. L. et al. in Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) 867–952 (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Meehl, G. A., Hu, A., Arblaster, J. M., Fasullo, J. & Trenberth, K. E. Externally forced and internally generated decadal climate variability associated with the interdecadal Pacific oscillation. J. Clim. 26, 7298–7310 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Trenberth, K. E., Fasullo, J. T., Branstator, G. & Phillips, A. S. Seasonal aspects of the recent pause in surface warming. Nat. Clim. Change 4, 911–916 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Pan, Y. H. & Oort, A. H. Global climate variations connected with sea surface temperature anomalies in the eastern equatorial Pacific Ocean for the 1958–73 period. Mon. Weath. Rev. 111, 1244–1258 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Power, S., Casey, T., Folland, C., Colman, A. & Mehta, V. Inter-decadal modulation of the impact of ENSO on Australia. Clim. Dynam. 15, 319–324 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Luo, J.-J. & Yamagata, T. Long-term El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO)-like variation with special emphasis on the South Pacific. J. Geophys. Res. 106, 22211–22227 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Cowtan, K. & Way, R. G. Coverage bias in the HadCRUT4 temperature series and its impact on recent temperature trends. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 140, 1935–1944 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Chen, X. & Tung, K.-K. Varying planetary heat sink led to global-warming slowdown and acceleration. Science 345, 897–903 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Drijfhout, S. et al. Surface warming hiatus caused by increased heat uptake across multiple ocean basins. Geophys. Res. Lett. 41, 7868–7874 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Keenlyside, N. S. & Ba, J. Prospects for decadal climate prediction. WIREs Clim. Change 1, 627–635 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Booth, B. B., Dunstone, N. J., Halloran, P. R., Andrews, T. & Bellouin, N. Aerosols implicated as a prime driver of twentieth-century North Atlantic climate variability. Nature 484, 228–232 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Swart, N. C., Fyfe, J. C., Hawkins, E., Kay, J. E. & Jahn, A. Influence of internal variability on Arctic sea-ice trends. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 86–89 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Screen, J. A. & Francis, J. A. Contribution of sea-ice loss to Arctic amplification is regulated by Pacific Ocean decadal variability. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 856–860 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Tett, S. F. et al. Estimation of natural and anthropogenic contributions to twentieth century temperature change. J. Geophys. Res. http://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD000028 (2002).

  29. Luo, J.-J., Wang, G. & Dommenget, D. May common model biases reduce CMIP5’s ability to simulate the recent Pacific La Niña-like cooling? Clim. Dynam.http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00382-017-3688-8 (2017).

  30. Wilcox, L. J., Highwood, E. J. & Dunstone, N. J. The influence of anthropogenic aerosol on multi-decadal variations of historical global climate. Environ. Res. Lett. 8, 024033 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Morice, C. P., Kennedy, J. J., Rayner, N. A. & Jones, P. D. Quantifying uncertainties in global and regional temperature change using an ensemble of observational estimates: the HadCRUT4 data set. J. Geophys. Res. 117, D08101 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Jones, P. et al. Hemispheric and large-scale land-surface air temperature variations: an extensive revision and an update to 2010. J. Geophys. Res. 117, D05127 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Hansen, J., Ruedy, R., Sato, M. & Lo, K. Global surface temperature change. Rev. Geophys. 48, RG4004 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Vose, R. S. et al. NOAA’s merged land-ocean surface temperature analysis. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 93, 1677–1685 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Hirahara, S., Ishii, M. & Fukuda, Y. Centennial-scale sea surface temperature analysis and its uncertainty. J. Clim. 27, 57–75 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Hurrell, J. W., Hack, J. J., Shea, D., Caron, J. M. & Rosinski, J. A new sea surface temperature and sea ice boundary dataset for the Community Atmosphere Model. J. Clim. 21, 5145–5153 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Taylor, K. E., Stouffer, R. J. & Meehl, G. A. An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 93, 485–498 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Sen, P. K. Estimates of the regression coefficient based on Kendall’s tau. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 63, 1379–1389 (1968).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Roeckner, E. et al. The atmospheric general circulation model ECHAM 5. PART I: model description Report 349 (Max-Planck-Institut für Meteorologie, 2003).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41425019 and 41661144016), and the Public Science and Technology Research Funds Projects of Ocean (201505013). P.W. was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41375112). We thank the Max Plank Institute for Meteorology for providing the ECHAM5 atmospheric general circulation model, the World Climate Research Programme’s Working Group on Coupled Modeling for providing the CMIP multi-model data sets, S.-P. Xie, C. Chung and P. Reid for their helpful comments and/or discussions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

S.-L.Y., J.-J.L. and G.H. conceived the research; J.-J.L. and S.-L.Y. designed the model experiments; S.-L.Y. and P.W. performed numerical simulations; S.-L.Y. performed the data analysis; J.-J.L. and S.-L.Y. wrote the paper; J.-J.L. and G.H. supervised this study.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jing-Jia Luo or Gang Huang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information (PDF 1572 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yao, SL., Luo, JJ., Huang, G. et al. Distinct global warming rates tied to multiple ocean surface temperature changes. Nature Clim Change 7, 486–491 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3304

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3304

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing