Letter | Published:

Future increases in extreme precipitation exceed observed scaling rates

Nature Climate Change volume 7, pages 128132 (2017) | Download Citation

Abstract

Models and physical reasoning predict that extreme precipitation will increase in a warmer climate due to increased atmospheric humidity1,2,3. Observational tests using regression analysis have reported a puzzling variety of apparent scaling rates including strong rates in midlatitude locations but weak or negative rates in the tropics4,5. Here we analyse daily extreme precipitation events in several Australian cities to show that temporary local cooling associated with extreme events and associated synoptic conditions reduces these apparent scaling rates, especially in warmer climatic conditions. A regional climate projection ensemble6 for Australia, which implicitly includes these effects, accurately and robustly reproduces the observed apparent scaling throughout the continent for daily precipitation extremes. Projections from the same model show future daily extremes increasing at rates faster than those inferred from observed scaling. The strongest extremes (99.9th percentile events) scale significantly faster than near-surface water vapour, between 5.7–15% °C−1 depending on model details. This scaling rate is highly correlated with the change in water vapour, implying a trade-off between a more arid future climate or one with strong increases in extreme precipitation. These conclusions are likely to generalize to other regions.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    , , & The changing character of precipitation. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 84, 1205–1217 (2003).

  2. 2.

    & The physical basis for increases in precipitation extremes in simulations of 21st-century climate change. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 14773–14777 (2009).

  3. 3.

    , & Heavy precipitation in a changing climate: Does short-term summer precipitation increase faster? Geophys. Res. Lett. 42, 1165–1172 (2015).

  4. 4.

    , & Observed relationships between extreme sub-daily precipitation, surface temperature, and relative humidity. Geophys. Res. Lett. 37, L22805 (2010).

  5. 5.

    , , , & Does higher surface temperature intensify extreme precipitation? Geophy. Res. Lett. 38, L16708 (2011).

  6. 6.

    et al. Design of a regional climate modelling projection ensemble experiment–NARCliM. Geosci. Model Dev. 7, 621–629 (2014).

  7. 7.

    Precipitation extremes under climate change. Curr. Clim. Change Rep. 1, 49–59 (2015).

  8. 8.

    , , & Changes in temperature and precipitation extremes in the CMIP5 ensemble. Climatic Change 119, 345–357 (2013).

  9. 9.

    , & Intensification of precipitation extremes with warming in a cloud-resolving model. J. Clim. 24, 2784–2800 (2011).

  10. 10.

    et al. Heavier summer downpours with climate change revealed by weather forecast resolution model. Nat. Clim. Change 4, 570–576 (2014).

  11. 11.

    , , , & Downturn in scaling of UK extreme rainfall with temperature for future hottest days. Nat. Geosci. 9, 24–28 (2016).

  12. 12.

    & Atmospheric warming and the amplification of precipitation extremes. Science 321, 1481–1484 (2008).

  13. 13.

    & Influence of microphysics on the scaling of precipitation extremes with temperature. Geophys. Res. Lett. 41, 6037–6044 (2014).

  14. 14.

    & Increase in hourly precipitation extremes beyond expectations from temperature changes. Nat. Geosci. 1, 511–514 (2008).

  15. 15.

    , & Evaluation of the convection-resolving regional climate modeling approach in decade-simulations. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 119, 7889–7907 (2014).

  16. 16.

    , & Strong increase in convective precipitation in response to higher temperatures. Nat. Geosci. 6, 181–185 (2013).

  17. 17.

    et al. Scaling precipitation extremes with temperature in the Mediterranean: past climate assessment and projection in anthropogenic scenarios. Clim. Dynam. (2016).

  18. 18.

    , , , & Temperature influences on intense UK hourly precipitation and dependency on large-scale circulation. Environ. Res. Lett. 10, 054021 (2015).

  19. 19.

    , & The relationship between extreme hourly precipitation and surface temperature in different hydroclimatic regions of the United States. J. Hydrometeorol. 12, 319–325 (2011).

  20. 20.

    , , & Linkage between hourly precipitation events and atmospheric temperature changes over China during the warm season. Sci. Rep. 6, 22543 (2016).

  21. 21.

    et al. Seasonal characteristics of the relationship between daily precipitation intensity and surface temperature. J. Geophys. Res. 114, D18102 (2009).

  22. 22.

    , & Temperature and CAPE dependence of rainfall extremes in the eastern United States. Geophys. Res. Lett. 42, 74–83 (2015).

  23. 23.

    & Unexpected increase in precipitation intensity with temperature—A result of mixing of precipitation types? Atmos. Res. 119, 56–61 (2013).

  24. 24.

    et al. Future changes to the intensity and frequency of short-duration extreme rainfall. Rev. Geophys. 52, 522–555 (2014).

  25. 25.

    , & Global increasing trends in annual maximum daily precipitation. J. Clim. 26, 3904–3918 (2013).

  26. 26.

    Sensitivity of tropical precipitation extremes to climate change. Nat. Geosci. 5, 697–700 (2012).

  27. 27.

    Climate change, atmospheric rivers, and floods in California–a multimodel analysis of storm frequency and magnitude changes. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 47, 514–523 (2011).

  28. 28.

    , & High-quality spatial climate data-sets for Australia. Aust. Meteorol. Oceanogr. J. 58, 233–248 (2009).

  29. 29.

    & Physical mechanisms of the Australian summer monsoon: 1. Seasonal cycle. J. Geophys. Res. 111, D204104 (2006).

  30. 30.

    & Observed evolution of tropical deep convective events and their environment. Mon. Weath. Rev. 127, 1777–1795 (1999).

  31. 31.

    & Convective cloud systems and warm-pool sea surface temperatures: coupled interactions and self-regulation. J. Geophys. Res. 98, 12881–12893 (1993).

  32. 32.

    , , & Scaling and trends of hourly precipitation extremes in two different climate zones–Hong Kong and the Netherlands. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 15, 3033–3041 (2011).

  33. 33.

    , & The role of East Coast Lows on rainfall patterns and inter-annual variability across the East Coast of Australia. Int. J. Climatol. 34, 1011–1021 (2014).

  34. 34.

    et al. Evaluating regional climate models for simulating sub-daily rainfall extremes. Clim. Dynam. 47, 1613–1628 (2016).

  35. 35.

    & The physical basis for increases in precipitation extremes in simulations of 21st-century climate change. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 14773–14777 (2009).

  36. 36.

    et al. Probable maximum precipitation and climate change. Geophys. Res. Lett. 40, 1402–1408 (2013).

  37. 37.

    & A drier future? Science 343, 737–739 (2014).

  38. 38.

    et al. HadISD: a quality-controlled global synoptic report database for selected variables at long-term stations from 1973–2011. Clim. Past. 8, 1649–1679 (2012).

  39. 39.

    IPCC, Special Report on Emissions Scenarios (eds Nakićenović, N. & Swart, R.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2000).

  40. 40.

    et al. A Description of the Advanced Research WRF Version 3 NCAR Technical Note (NCAR, 2008).

  41. 41.

    , & Evaluating the performance of a WRF physics ensemble over South-East Australia. Clim. Dynam. 39, 1241–1258 (2012).

  42. 42.

    , , & Evaluating rainfall patterns using physics scheme ensembles from a regional atmospheric model. Theor. Appl. Climatol. 115, 297–304 (2014).

  43. 43.

    , , & Optimally choosing small ensemble members to produce robust climate simulations. Environ. Res. Lett. 8, 044050 (2013).

  44. 44.

    et al. Percentile indices for assessing changes in heavy precipitation events. Climatic Change 137, 201–216 (2016).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the Bureau of Meteorology, the Bureau of Rural Sciences, and CSIRO for providing AWAP data and Met Office Hadley Center for providing HadISD data. Model data used here came from the NSW Office of Environment and Heritage-backed NSW/ACT Regional Climate Modelling Project (NARCliM). This work was funded by ARC grants FL150100035, LE150100089, FT110100576 and DP160103439.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Climate Change Research Centre and ARC Centre of Excellence for Climate System Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales 2052, Australia

    • Jiawei Bao
    • , Steven C. Sherwood
    • , Lisa V. Alexander
    •  & Jason P. Evans

Authors

  1. Search for Jiawei Bao in:

  2. Search for Steven C. Sherwood in:

  3. Search for Lisa V. Alexander in:

  4. Search for Jason P. Evans in:

Contributions

J.B. conducted all analyses and led the writing of the manuscript. S.C.S. assisted in study design and interpretation, L.V.A. assisted in choice and interpretation of observational data, and J.P.E. performed the NARCliM simulations.  All authors assisted in writing the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jiawei Bao or Steven C. Sherwood.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    Supplementary Information

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3201

Further reading