Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Reduced CO2 fertilization effect in temperate C3 grasslands under more extreme weather conditions

Abstract

The increase in atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations from anthropogenic activities is the major driver of recent global climate change1. The stimulation of plant photosynthesis due to rising atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations ([CO2]) is widely assumed to increase the net primary productivity (NPP) of C3 plants—the CO2 fertilization effect (CFE)1,2,3,4,5,6,7. However, the magnitude and persistence of the CFE under future climates, including more frequent weather extremes, are controversial1,2,3,8,9,10,11,12. Here we use data from 16 years of temperate grassland grown under ‘free-air carbon dioxide enrichment’ conditions to show that the CFE on above-ground biomass is strongest under local average environmental conditions. The observed CFE was reduced or disappeared under wetter, drier and/or hotter conditions when the forcing variable exceeded its intermediate regime. This is in contrast to predictions of an increased CO2 fertilization effect under drier and warmer conditions13. Such extreme weather conditions are projected to occur more intensely and frequently under future climate scenarios1. Consequently, current biogeochemical models might overestimate the future NPP sink capacity of temperate C3 grasslands and hence underestimate future atmospheric [CO2] increase.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Dependence of the CO2 fertilization effect (CFE) on drought-related variables.
Figure 2: Dependence of the CO2 fertilization effect (CFE) on heat-related variables.
Figure 3: Synopsis of the CO2 fertilization effect dependent on different environmental conditions during the three months preceding the harvest.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. IPCC Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013).

  2. Arneth, A. et al. Terrestrial biogeochemical cycles in the climate system. Nat. Geosci. 3, 525–532 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ainsworth, E. & Rogers, A. The response of photosynthesis and stomatal conductance to rising [CO2]: mechanisms and environmental interactions. Plant Cell Environ. 30, 258–270 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Luo, Y. Terrestrial carbon–cycle feedback to climate warming. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evolut. Syst. 38, 683–712 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Long, S. P. Modification of the response of photosynthetic productivity to rising temperature by atmospheric CO2 concentrations: has its importance been underestimated? Plant Cell Environ. 14, 729–739 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Nowak, R. S., Ellsworth, D. S. & Smith, S. D. Functional responses of plants to elevated atmospheric CO2—do photosynthetic and productivity data from FACE experiments support early predictions? New Phytol. 162, 253–280 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Soussana, J.-F. & Lüscher, A. Temperate grasslands and global atmospheric change: a review. Grass Forage Sci. 62, 127–134 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Friedlingstein, P. et al. Uncertainties in CMIP5 climate projections due to carbon cycle feedbacks. J. Clim. 27, 511–526 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kolby Smith, W. et al. Large divergence of satellite and Earth system model estimates of global terrestrial CO2 fertilization. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 306–310 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Reich, P. B., Hobbie, S. E. & Lee, T. D. Plant growth enhancement by elevated CO2 eliminated by joint water and nitrogen limitation. Nat. Geosci. 7, 2–6 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hovenden, M. J., Newton, P. C. D. & Wills, K. E. Seasonal not annual rainfall determines grassland biomass response to carbon dioxide. Nature 511, 583–586 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Reichstein, M. et al. Climate extremes and the carbon cycle. Nature 500, 287–295 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang, D. L., Heckathorn, S. A., Wang, X. & Philpott, S. M. A meta-analysis of plant physiological and growth responses to temperature and elevated CO2 . Oecologia http://doi.org/dsfsnq (2012).

  14. Foley, J. A. et al. Solutions for a cultivated planet. Nature 478, 337–342 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Statistics Division (2011 accessed January 2016); http://faostat3.fao.org/browse/E/EL/E

  16. Booth, B. B. B. et al. High sensitivity of future global warming to land carbon cycle processes. Environ. Res. Lett. 7, 024002 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Schimel, D., Stephens, B. B. & Fisher, J. B. Effect of increasing CO2 on the terrestrial carbon cycle. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 436–441 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Morison, J. I. L. & Lawlor, D. W. Interactions between increasing CO2 concentration and temperature on plant growth. Plant Cell Environ. 22, 659–682 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Morgan, J. A. et al. Water relations in grassland and desert ecosystems exposed to elevated atmospheric CO2 . Oecologia 140, 11–25 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Volk, M., Niklaus, P. A. & Körner, C. Soil moisture effects determine CO2 responses of grassland species. Oecologia 125, 380–388 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Owensby, C. E., Ham, J. M., Knapp, A. K. & Auen, L. M. Biomass production and species composition change in a tallgrass prairie ecosystem after long-term exposure to elevated atmospheric CO2 . Glob. Change Biol. 5, 497–506 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Farrior, C. E. et al. Resource limitation in a competitive context determines complex plant responses to experimental resource additions. Ecology 94, 2505–2517 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Fatichi, S., Leuzinger, S. & Körner, C. Moving beyond photosynthesis: from carbon-source to sink-driven vegetation modeling. New Phytol. 201, 1086–1095 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Körner, C. Paradigm shift in plant growth control. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 25, 107–114 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Shaw, M. R. et al. Grassland responses to global environmental changes suppressed by elevated CO2 . Science 298, 1987–1990 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Dukes, J. S. et al. Responses of grassland production to single and multiple global environmental changes. PLoS Biol. 3, 1829–1837 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Oren, R. et al. Survey and synthesis of intra- and interspecific variation in stomatal sensitivity to vapour pressure deficit. Plant Cell Environ. 22, 1515–1526 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. De Boeck, H. J. & Verbeeck, H. Drought-associated changes in climate and their relevance for ecosystem experiments and models. Biogeosciences 8, 1121–1130 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Cox, P. M., Betts, R. A., Jones, C. D., Spall, S. A. & Totterdell, I. J. Acceleration of global warming due to carbon-cycle feedbacks in a coupled climate model. Nature 408, 184–187 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Ciais, P. et al. Europe-wide reduction in primary productivity caused by the heat and drought in 2003. Nature 437, 529–533 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Jäger, H.-J. et al. The University of Giessen free-air carbon dioxide enrichment study: description of the experimental site and of a new enrichment system. J. Appl. Bot. 77, 117–127 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kammann, C., Grünhage, L., Grüters, U., Janze, S. & Jäger, H.-J. Response of aboveground grassland biomass and soil moisture to moderate long-term CO2 enrichment. Basic Appl. Ecol. 6, 351–365 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Reich, P. B. et al. Plant diversity enhances ecosystem responses to elevated CO2 and nitrogen deposition. Nature 410, 809–810 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. FAO, Draft World Reference Base for Soil Resources (FAO, ISSS and ISRIC, 1994).

  35. Allen, R. G., Pereira, L. S., Raes, D. & Smith, M. Crop Evapotranspiration: Guidelines for Computing Crop Water Requirements. Irrigation and Drainage Paper Vol. 56 (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  36. R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing (2014).

  37. Obermeier, W. A., Lehnert, W. L. & Bendix, J. msaFACE: Moving Subset Analysis FACE. R package version 0.1.0. (R-project, 2016); https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=msaFACE

  38. Obermeier, W. A. Longterm Time Series of the Giessen Free Air Carbon Enrichment Experiment (GiFACE) (Laboratory for Climatology and Remote Sensing (LCRS), 2016); http://dx.doi.org/10.5678/LCRS/DAT.265

Download references

Acknowledgements

The contribution of the following individuals to the initiation, construction, installation and long-term, ongoing maintenance of the Giessen FACE experiment is gratefully acknowledged: H.-J. Jäger (deceased 2013), S. Schmidt, J. Senkbeil, W. Stein, B. Lenz, J. Franz, T. Strohbusch, G. Mayer and A. Brück. The continued financial support of the Hessian Agency for Nature Conservation, Environment and Geology is gratefully acknowledged since it allowed an exceptionally long data set to be obtained. This research has been funded by the LOEWE excellence cluster FACE2FACE of the Hessian State Ministry of Higher Education, Research and the Arts.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The statistical analysis was designed and implemented by W.A.O., L.W.L. and J.B.; all authors contributed to the interpretation of the results and the writing of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to W. A. Obermeier.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information (PDF 4395 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Obermeier, W., Lehnert, L., Kammann, C. et al. Reduced CO2 fertilization effect in temperate C3 grasslands under more extreme weather conditions. Nature Clim Change 7, 137–141 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3191

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3191

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing