A global North–South divide in research, and its negative consequences, has been highlighted in various scientific disciplines. Northern domination of science relevant to climate change policy and practice, and limited research led by Southern researchers in Southern countries, may hinder further development and implementation of global climate change agreements and nationally appropriate actions. Despite efforts to address the North–South divide, progress has been slow. In this Perspective, we illustrate the extent of the divide, review underlying issues and analyse their consequences for climate change policy development and implementation. We propose a set of practical steps in both Northern and Southern countries that a wide range of actors should take at global, regional and national scales to span the North–South divide, with examples of some actions already being implemented.
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $17.75 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Rent or Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
Wollfers, I., Adjei, S. & van der Drift, R. Health research in the tropics. Lancet 351, 1652–1654 (1995).
Jeffery, R. Authorship in multi-disciplinary, multi-national North-South research projects: issues of equity, capacity and accountability. J. Comp. Int. Educ. 44, 208–229 (2014).
Karlsson, S. in Global Environmental Governance: Options and Opportunities (eds Esty, D. C. & Ivanova, M. H.) 53–76 (Yale School of Forestry & Environmental Studies, 2002).
Karlsson, S., Srebotnjak, T. & Gonzales, P. Understanding the North–South knowledge divide and its implications for policy: a quantitative analysis of the generation of scientific knowledge in the environmental sciences. Environ. Sci. Policy 10, 668–684 (2007).
Cash, D. W. et al. Knowledge systems for sustainable development. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 8086–8091 (2003).
Pasgaard, M. & Strange, N. A quantitative analysis of the causes of the global climate change research distribution. Global Environ. Change 23, 1684–1693 (2013).
Corbera, E., Calvet-Mir, L., Hughes, H. & Paterson, M. Patterns of authorship in the IPCC Working Group III report. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 94–100 (2016).
Hulme, M. & Mahony, M. Climate change: what do we know about the IPCC? Prog. Phys. Geog. 34, 705–718 (2010).
Agarwal, A., Narain, S. & Sharma, A. (eds) Green Politics: Global Environmental Negotiations (Centre for Science and Environment, 1999).
Crossley, M. & Sprague, T. Education for sustainable development: Implications for small island developing states (SIDS). Int. J. Edu. Dev. 35, 86–95 (2014).
Butler, D. Call for North/South code of research ethics. Nature 406, 337 (2000).
KFPE Guidelines for Research in Partnership with Developing Countries. 11 principles. (Swiss Commission for Research Partnership with Developing Countries, 1998).
Binka, F. North–South research collaborations: a move towards a true partnership? Trop. Med. Int. Health 10, 207–209 (2005).
Transforming Our World: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development A/RES/70/1 (United Nations, 2015).
World Development Indicators (World Bank, accessed 28 May 2016); http://go.nature.com/2hgoiqz
Research Co-operation Between Developed and Developing Countries in the Area of Climate Change Adaptation and Biodiversity (OECD, 2014).
Jentsch, B. & Pilley, C. Research relationships between the South and the North: Cinderella and the ugly sisters? Soc. Sci. Med. 57, 1957–1967 (2003).
Teferra, D. & Altbach, P. G. African higher education: challenges for the 21st century. High. Edu. 47, 21–50 (2004).
Glänzel, W., Leta, J. & Thus, B. Science in Brazil Part 1: a macro-level comparative study. Scientometrics 67, 67–86 (2006).
Forero-Pineda, C. & Jaramillo-Salazar, H. The access of researchers from developing countries to international science and technology. Int. Soc. Sci. J. 171, 129–140 (2002).
Barrett, M., Crossley, H. & Dachi, A. International collaboration and research capacity building: learning from the EdQual experience, Comp. Educ. 47, 25–43 (2011).
Aviles, L. A. Epidemiology as discourse: the politics of development institutions in the epidemiological profile of El Salvador. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 55, 164–171 (2001).
Hassan, M. H. A. Can science save Africa? Science 292, 12–13 (2001).
Mullan, F. The metrics of the physician brain drain. N. Engl. J. Med. 353, 1850–1852 (2005).
Seguin B., Singer, P. A. & Daar, A. S. Scientific diasporas. Science 312, 1602–1603 (2006).
Landau, L. B. Communities of knowledge or tyrannies of partnership: reflections on North–South research networks and the dual imperative. J. Refugee Stud. 25, 555–570 (2012).
Edejer, T. T.-T. North-South research partnerships: the ethics of carrying out research in developing countries. BMJ 319, 438–441 (1999).
Steinberg, P. F. in Transnational Relations and Biodiversity Policy in Costa Rica and Bolivia Ch. 1, 3–26 (MIT Press, 2001).
Karlsson, S. I. Institutionalized knowledge challenges in pesticide governance: the end of knowledge and beginning of values in governing globalized environmental issues. Int. Environ. Agreements Polit. Law Econ. 4, 195–213 (2004).
Kandlikar, M. & Sagar, A. Climate change research and analysis in India: an integrated assessment of a South-North divide. Global Environ. Change 9, 119–138 (1999).
Sarewitz, D., Pielke R. A. Jr The neglected heart of science policy: reconciling supply of and demand for science. Environ. Sci. Policy 10, 5–16 (2007).
Moreno, E., Gutiérrez, J. M. & Chaves-Olarte, E. The struggle of neglected scientific groups: ten years of NeTropica efforts to promote research in tropical diseases in Central America. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 5, e1055 (2011).
Swartz, S. Navigational capacities in contexts of adversity: establishing a consortium of global South youth scholars (COGSYS) (HSRC, 2016).
World Bank Country and Lending Groups (World Bank, accessed 28 May 2016); http://go.nature.com/2gpbHhv
We would like to thank A. Engelmann and M. Stråhle from the SLU University Library for the help with the bibliographic analysis.
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
About this article
Cite this article
Blicharska, M., Smithers, R., Kuchler, M. et al. Steps to overcome the North–South divide in research relevant to climate change policy and practice. Nature Clim Change 7, 21–27 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3163
Capacity building for implementation of nationally determined contributions under the Paris Agreement
Climate Policy (2020)
Dichotomous impacts on social and environmental sustainability: competitiveness and development levels matter
Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal (2020)
Negotiating positionality amid postcolonial knowledge relations: insights from Nordic-based Sub-Saharan African academics
Race Ethnicity and Education (2020)
Annals of Medicine (2019)
O painel brasileiro de mudanças climáticas na interface entre ciência e políticas públicas: identidades, geopolítica e concepções epistemológicas