Amplified plant turnover in response to climate change forecast by Late Quaternary records


Conservation decisions are informed by twenty-first-century climate impact projections that typically predict high extinction risk1,2. Conversely, the palaeorecord shows strong sensitivity of species abundances and distributions to past climate changes3, but few clear instances of extinctions attributable to rising temperatures. However, few studies have incorporated palaeoecological data into projections of future distributions. Here we project changes in abundance and conservation status under a climate warming scenario for 187 European and North American plant taxa using niche-based models calibrated against taxa–climate relationships for the past 21,000 years. We find that incorporating long-term data into niche-based models increases the magnitude of projected future changes for plant abundances and community turnover. The larger projected changes in abundances and community turnover translate into different, and often more threatened, projected IUCN conservation status for declining tree taxa, compared with traditional approaches. An average of 18.4% (North America) and 15.5% (Europe) of taxa switch IUCN categories when compared with single-time model results. When taxa categorized as ‘Least Concern’ are excluded, the palaeo-calibrated models increase, on average, the conservation threat status of 33.2% and 56.8% of taxa. Notably, however, few models predict total disappearance of taxa, suggesting resilience for these taxa, if climate were the only extinction driver. Long-term studies linking palaeorecords and forecasting techniques have the potential to improve conservation assessments.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: A framework for harnessing fossil data to temporally extend Hutchinsonian niches and improve future species predictions.
Figure 2: Projected abundance changes and IUCN conservation status for 2050.
Figure 3: Cross-validation analysis.
Figure 4: Modelled changes in relative pollen abundance for 2050.


  1. 1

    Urban, M. C. Accelerating extinction risk from climate change. Science 348, 571–573 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Garcia, R. A., Cabeza, M., Rahbek, C. & Araújo, M. B. Multiple dimensions of climate change and their implications for biodiversity. Science 344, 1247579 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Willis, K. J. & MacDonald, G. M. Long-term ecological records and their relevance to climate change predictions for a warmer world. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 42, 267–287 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Nogués-Bravo, D. Predicting the past distribution of species climatic niches. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 18, 521–531 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Dietl, G. P. & Flessa, K. W. Conservation paleobiology: putting the dead to work. Trends Ecol. Evol. 26, 30–37 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Maguire, K. C., Nieto-Lugilde, D., Fitzpatrick, M. C., Williams, J. W. & Blois, J. L. Modeling species and community responses to past, present, and future episodes of climatic and ecological change. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 46, 343–368 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Dawson, T. P., Jackson, S. T., House, J. I., Prentice, I. C. & Mace, G. M. Beyond predictions: biodiversity conservation in a changing climate. Science 332, 53–58 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Williams, J. W. et al. The ice age ecologist: testing methods for reserve prioritization during the last global warming. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 22, 289–301 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Maiorano, L. et al. Building the niche through time: using 13,000 years of data to predict the effects of climate change on three tree species in Europe. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 22, 302–317 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Willis, K. J. & Bhagwat, S. A. Biodiversity and climate change. Science 326, 806–807 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Barnosky, A. D. et al. Approaching a state shift in Earth’s biosphere. Nature 486, 52–58 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Willis, K. J., Bailey, R. M., Bhagwat, S. A. & Birks, H. J. B. Biodiversity baselines, thresholds and resilience: testing predictions and assumptions using palaeoecological data. Trends Ecol. Evol. 25, 583–591 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Lorenzen, E. D. et al. Species-specific responses of Late Quaternary megafauna to climate and humans. Nature 479, 359–364 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Brewer, S., Jackson, S. T. & Williams, J. W. Paleoecoinformatics: applying geohistorical data to ecological questions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 27, 104–112 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Barbet-Massin, M., Thuiller, W. & Jiguet, F. How much do we overestimate future local extinction rates when restricting the range of occurrence data in climate suitability models? Ecography 33, 878–886 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Veloz, S. D. et al. No-analog climates and shifting realized niches during the late Quaternary: implications for 21st-century predictions by species distribution models. Glob. Change Biol. 18, 1698–1713 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Hutchinson, G. E. Concluding remarks. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 22, 415–427 (1957).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Araújo, M. B. & New, M. Ensemble forecasting of species distributions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 22, 42–47 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    IUCN Guidelines for using the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria Version 10 (IUCN, 2013).

  20. 20

    Jackson, S. T. & Overpeck, J. T. Responses of plant populations and communities to environmental changes of the late quaternary. Paleobiology 26, 194–220 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Elith, J., Kearney, M. & Phillips, S. The art of modelling range-shifting species. Methods Ecol. Evol. 1, 330–342 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Birks, H. J. B. & Birks, H. H. Biological responses to rapid climate change at the Younger Dryas-Holocene transition at Krákenes, western Norway. Holocene 18, 19–30 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Jackson, S. T. & Weng, C. Late Quaternary extinction of a tree species in eastern North America. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 13847–13852 (1999).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Prentice, I. C. & Webb, T. Pollen percentages, tree abundances and the Fagerlind effect. J. Quat. Sci. 1, 35–43 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Ordonez, A. & Williams, J. W. Climatic and biotic velocities for woody taxa distributions over the last 16000 years in eastern North America. Ecol. Lett. 16, 773–781 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Feurdean, A. et al. Tree migration-rates: narrowing the gap between inferred post-glacial rates and projected rates. PLoS ONE 8, e71797 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Brook, B. W., Sodhi, N. S. & Bradshaw, C. J. A. Synergies among extinction drivers under global change. Trends Ecol. Evol. 23, 453–460 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Fordham, D. et al. Population dynamics can be more important than physiological limits for determining range shifts under climate change. Glob. Change Biol. 19, 3224–3237 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Moritz, C. et al. Impact of a century of climate change on small-mammal communities in Yosemite National Park, USA. Science 322, 261–264 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30

    Fordham, D. A., Brook, B. W., Moritz, C. & Nogués-Bravo, D. Better forecasts of range dynamics using genetic data. Trends Ecol. Evol. 29, 436–443 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31

    Davis, B. A. S. et al. The temperature of Europe during the Holocene reconstructed from pollen data. Quat. Sci. Rev. 22, 1701–1716 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


D.N.-B. thanks det Frie Forskningsrads forskerkarriereprogram Sapere Aude. D.N.-B., B.G.H. and C.R. thank the Danish National Research Foundation for its support of the Center for Macroecology, Evolution, and Climate. J.W.W. was supported by the National Science Foundation (EAR-0844223, DEB-1257508) and the Climate, People, and Environment Program at the University of Wisconsin. J.S. and P.V. were supported by the British Broadcasting Corporation, BBC. B.G.H. also thanks the Marie Curie Actions under the Seventh Framework Programme (PIEF-GA-2009-252888) and B.G.H. and C.R. acknowledge the support of Imperial College London’s Grand Challenges in Ecosystems and the Environment Initiative.

Author information




D.N.-B. conceived and headed the overall project. D.N.-B., S.V., B.G.H., S.C.B., J.W.W. and C.R. provided the main conceptual and methodological inputs. S.C.B. and J.W.W. provided the fossil pollen databases. J.S. and P.V. provided the palaeoclimatic simulations. B.G.H. performed the climate envelope model analysis. D.N.-B. performed the IUCN conservation status estimates and the model validation analysis. S.V. performed the niche-overlap and non-analogue climate analyses. D.N.-B. conducted the analysis on the differences of CO2 concentrations across time and the effect of abundance on the magnitude of change among IUCN categories. D.N.-B., S.V., B.G.H., S.C.B., J.W.W. and C.R. wrote most of the manuscript, with input from B.D., J.S. and P.V.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Nogués-Bravo.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information (PDF 1158 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nogués-Bravo, D., Veloz, S., Holt, B. et al. Amplified plant turnover in response to climate change forecast by Late Quaternary records. Nature Clim Change 6, 1115–1119 (2016).

Download citation

Further reading


Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter for a daily update on COVID-19 science.
Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing