Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Satellite based estimates underestimate the effect of CO2 fertilization on net primary productivity

Nature Climate Change volume 6, pages 892–893 (2016)Cite this article

Subjects

To the Editor

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Get just this article for as long as you need it

$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Illustration of the effect of different measurements of atmospheric CO2 concentration (Ca) ranges on estimation of β, defined as the relative change in net primary productivity (NPP) for a 100-ppm change in Ca.

References

  1. Smith, W. K. et al. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 306–310 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hungate, B. A. et al. Science 302, 1512–1513 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhang, Y., Xu, M. & Adams, J. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 18, 280–290 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Medlyn, B. E. Science 333, 1093 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Jung, M. et al. J. Geophys. Res. 116, G00J07 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Liu, Y. Y. et al. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 22, 692–705 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Norby, R. J. et al. Prod. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 18052–18056 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Iversen, C. M., Ledford, J. & Norby, R. J. New Phytol. 179, 837–847 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Franks, P. J. et al. New Phytol. 197, 1077–1094 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Talhelm, A. F. et al. Glob. Change Biol. 20, 2492–2504 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Reich, P. B. & Hobbie, S. E. Nat. Clim. Change 3, 278–282 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hedges, L. V., Gurevitch, J. & Curtis, P. S. Ecology 80, 1150–1156 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hoffman, F. M. et al. J. Geophys. Res. 119, 141–162 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wenzel, S., Cox, P. M., Eyring, V. & Friedlinsgtein, P. J. Geophys. Res. 119, 794–807 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Zaehle, S. et al. New Phytol. 202, 803–822 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, North Ryde, 2109, New South Wales, Australia

    Martin G. De Kauwe, Trevor F. Keenan & I. Colin Prentice

  2. Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, New South Wales, Australia

    Belinda E. Medlyn

  3. Department of Life Sciences, AXA Chair Programme in Biosphere and Climate Impacts, Imperial College London, Silwood Park Campus, Buckhurst Road, SL5 7PY, Ascot, UK

    I. Colin Prentice & Cesar Terrer

Authors
  1. Martin G. De Kauwe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Trevor F. Keenan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Belinda E. Medlyn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. I. Colin Prentice
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Cesar Terrer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin G. De Kauwe.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

De Kauwe, M., Keenan, T., Medlyn, B. et al. Satellite based estimates underestimate the effect of CO2 fertilization on net primary productivity. Nature Clim Change 6, 892–893 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3105

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3105

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing