Discussions on a long-term global goal to limit climate change, in the form of an upper limit to warming, were only partially resolved at the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change negotiations in Paris, 2015. Such a political agreement must be informed by scientific knowledge. One way to communicate the costs and benefits of policies is through a mapping that systematically explores the consequences of different choices. Such a multi-disciplinary effort based on the analysis of a set of scenarios helped structure the IPCC AR5 Synthesis Report. This Perspective summarizes this approach, reviews its strengths and limitations, and discusses how decision-makers can use its results in practice. It also identifies research needs that can facilitate integrated analysis of climate change and help better inform policy-makers and the public.
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $17.42 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Rent or Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
IPCC Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report (eds Pachauri, R. K. & Meyer, L. A.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014).
Knutti, R., Rogelj, J., Sedláček, J. & Fischer, E. M. A scientific critique of the two-degree climate change target. Nature Geosci. 9, 13–18 (2016).
Edenhofer, O. & Minx, J. Mapmakers and navigators, facts and values. Science 345, 37–38 (2014).
IPCC Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects (eds Field, C. B. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014).
IPCC Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013).
IPCC Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change (eds Edenhofer, O. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014).
Clark, P. U. et al. Consequences of twenty-first-century policy for multi-millennial climate and sea-level change. Nature Clim. Change 6, 360–369 (2016).
Rogelj, J. et al. Energy system transformations for limiting end-of-century warming to below 1.5 °C. Nature Clim. Change 5, 519–527 (2015).
Ha-Duong, M., Grubb, M. J. & Hourcade, J.-C. Influence of socioeconomic inertia and uncertainty on optimal CO2-emission abatement. Nature 390, 270–273 (1997).
Lempert, R. J. & Schlesinger, M. E. Robust strategies for abating climate change. Climatic Change 45, 387–401 (2000).
Yohe, G., Andronova, N. & Schlesinger, M. To hedge or not against an uncertain climate future? Science 306, 416–417 (2004).
Clarke, L. et al. in Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change (eds Edenhofer, O. et al.) Ch. 6 (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014).
van Vuuren, D. P. & Riahi, K. The relationship between short-term emissions and long-term concentration targets. Climatic Change 104, 793–801 (2010).
Smith, P. et al. Biophysical and economic limits to negative CO2 emissions. Nature Clim. Change 6, 42–50 (2016).
Williamson, P. Emissions reduction: scrutinize CO2 removal methods. Nature 530, 153–155 (2016).
Fawcett, A. A. et al. Can Paris pledges avert severe climate change? Science 350, 1168–1169 (2015).
Otto, F. E. L., Frame, D. J., Otto, A. & Allen, M. R. Embracing uncertainty in climate change policy. Nature Clim. Change 5, 917–920 (2015).
Kriegler, E. et al. Introduction to the AMPERE model intercomparison studies on the economics of climate stabilization. Technol. Forecast. Soc. 90, 1–7 (2015).
Luderer, G. et al. Economic mitigation challenges: how further delay closes the door for achieving climate targets. Environ. Res. Lett. 8, 34033 (2013).
Rogelj, J., McCollum, D. L., O'Neill, B. C. & Riahi, K. 2020 emissions levels required to limit warming to below 2 °C. Nature Clim. Change 3, 405–412 (2013).
von Stechow, C., Minx, J. C. & Riahi, K. 2 °C and the sustainable development goals: united they stand, divided they fall? Environ. Res. Lett. 11, 034022 (2015).
Guivarch, C. & Hallegatte, S. 2C or not 2C? Glob. Environ. Change 23, 179–192 (2013).
Pfister, P. L. & Stocker, T. F. Earth system commitments due to delayed mitigation. Environ. Res. Lett. 11, 14010 (2016).
Stocker, T. F. The closing door of climate targets. Science 339, 280–282 (2013).
Rogelj, J. et al. Disentangling the effects of CO2 and short-lived climate forcer mitigation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 16325–16330 (2014).
van Vuuren, D. P., Weyant, J. & de la Chesnaye, F. Multi-gas scenarios to stabilize radiative forcing. Energ. Econ. 28, 102–120 (2006).
Lenton, T. M. Environmental tipping points. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 38, 1–29 (2013).
Stocker, T. F. & Schmittner, A. Influence of CO2 emission rates on the stability of the thermohaline circulation. Nature 388, 862–865 (1997).
Steinacher, M., Joos, F. & Stocker, T. F. Allowable carbon emissions lowered by multiple climate targets. Nature 499, 197–201 (2013).
McCollum, D. L. et al. Climate policies can help resolve energy security and air pollution challenges. Climatic Change 119, 479–494 (2013).
von Stechow, C. et al. Integrating global climate change mitigation goals with other sustainability objectives: a synthesis. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 40, 363–394 (2015).
Hallegatte, S. et al. Shock Waves: Managing the Impacts of Climate Change on Poverty (World Bank, 2016).
O'Neill, B. C. et al. A new scenario framework for climate change research: the concept of shared socioeconomic pathways. Climatic Change 122, 387–400 (2013).
Vuuren, D. P. van. et al. A new scenario framework for climate change research: scenario matrix architecture. Climatic Change 122, 373–386 (2013).
This paper benefited from many discussions with all the authors of the AR5 Synthesis Report of the IPCC, many authors from the three Working Groups, and members from the government delegations during the approval plenary in Copenhagen, 2014. Marianne Fay, Jan Fuglestvedt and Brian O'Neill provided useful comment on previous versions of the manuscript.
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
About this article
Cite this article
Hallegatte, S., Rogelj, J., Allen, M. et al. Mapping the climate change challenge. Nature Clim Change 6, 663–668 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3057
Climatic Change (2020)
The Nonlinear Impacts of Global Warming on Regional Economic Production: An Empirical Analysis from China
Weather, Climate, and Society (2020)
Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society (2020)
Applied Energy (2020)
Journal of Materials Chemistry A (2020)