Implications of the Paris agreement for the ocean

In the aftermath of COP21, potential post-2030 emission trajectories and their consistency with the 2 °C target are a core concern for the ocean scientific community in light of the end-century risks of impact scenarios.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Contrasting risks of impact for the ocean and society in 2100 from different GHG emission pathways.


  1. 1

    Pörtner, H.-O. et al. in Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects (eds Field, C. B. et al.) Ch. 6 (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014).

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Hoegh-Guldberg, O. et al. in Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Part B: Regional Aspects (eds Field, C. B. et al.) Ch. 30 (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014).

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Gattuso, J.-P. et al. Science 349, 6243 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Nagelkerken, I. & Connell, S. D. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 13272–13277 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Beaugrand, G., Edwards, M., Raybaud, V., Goberville, E. & Kirby, R. R. Nature Clim. Change 5, 695–701 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Magnan, A. K. et al. Intertwined Ocean and Climate: Implication for International Climate Negotiations Policy Brief No. 4/15 (IDDRI, 2015).

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Mathiesen, K. & Harvey, H. Climate coalition breaks cover in Paris to push for binding and ambitious deal. The Guardian (8 December 2015);

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Adoption of The Paris Agreement FCCC/CP/2015/L.9/Rev.1 (UNFCCC, 2015);

  9. 9

    DeConto, R. M. & Pollard, D. Nature 531, 591–597 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Climate Action Tracker: INDCs lower projected warming to 2.7°C: significant progress but still above 2 °C. Climate Action Tracker (1 October 2015);

  11. 11

    Fawcett, A. A. et al. Science 350, 6265 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Albright, R. et al. Nature 531, 362–365 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Stocker, T. F. Science 350, 6262 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Steinacher, M. & Joos, F. Biogeosciences 13, 1071–1103 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    IPCC Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014).

  16. 16

    Iyer, G. C. et al. Environ. Res. Lett. 10, 125002 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Fay, M. et al. Decarbonizing Development: Three Steps to a Zero-Carbon Future (World Bank, 2015).

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Riebesell, U. & Gattuso, J.-P. Nature Clim. Change 5, 12–14 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Deep Decarbonization Pathways Project Pathways to Deep Decarbonization 2015 Report (SDSN & IDDRI, 2015);

  20. 20

    Spencer, T. et al. Beyond the Numbers. Understanding the Transformation Induced by INDCs: A Report of the MILES Project Consortium Study No. 5/15 (IDDRI, 2015).

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Smith, P. et al. Nature Clim. Change 6, 42–50 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Peters, G. P. Nature Clim. Change (2016).

Download references


This is a product of The Oceans 2015 Initiative, an expert group supported by the Prince Albert II of Monaco Foundation, the Ocean Acidification International Coordination Centre of the International Atomic Energy Agency, the BNP Paribas Foundation and the Monégasque Association for Ocean Acidification.The authors also benefited from financial support from the Children's Investment Fund Foundation (CIFF), Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ), German Environment Ministry, Gross Family Foundation, European Climate Foundation (ECF), Agence de l'Environnement et de la Maîtrise de l'Énergie (ADEME), Sustainable Development Solutions Network (SDSN), European Union DG CLIMA (21.0104/2014/684427/SER/CLIMA.A.4) and the French Government (ANR-10-LABX-01). A.K.M. acknowledges support from the French National Research Agency (CapAdapt Project ANR-2011-JSH1-004 01 and ANR-15-CE03-0003). R.B. is supported by the RESCCUE project funded by the French Development Agency and the French Global Environment Facility (AFD CZZ 1647 01 F and FFEM CZZ 1667 01 H). F.J. acknowledges support from the Swiss National Science Foundation.The contents of this piece are solely the opinions of the authors and do not constitute a statement of policy, decision or position on behalf of the French Government, the Pacific Community or any funding partners.The authors also thank W. Cramer and P. Barthélemy for their comments on an earlier version.

Author information




A.K.M., J.-P.G., M.C. and R.B. designed the research. A.K.M., J.-P.G. and F.J. put Fig. 1 and Table 1 together, and A.K.M., J.-P.G., O.H.-G., F.J. and H.-O.P. analysed ocean-related data and drew up the conclusions from Fig. 1 and Table 1. M.C., H.W. and T.S. analysed INDC-related material. All authors contributed to drafting and revising the manuscript as well as to the Supplementary Information.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexandre K. Magnan.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information (PDF 573 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Magnan, A., Colombier, M., Billé, R. et al. Implications of the Paris agreement for the ocean. Nature Clim Change 6, 732–735 (2016).

Download citation

Further reading


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing