Agent-based modelling of consumer energy choices


Strategies to mitigate global climate change should be grounded in a rigorous understanding of energy systems, particularly the factors that drive energy demand. Agent-based modelling (ABM) is a powerful tool for representing the complexities of energy demand, such as social interactions and spatial constraints. Unlike other approaches for modelling energy demand, ABM is not limited to studying perfectly rational agents or to abstracting micro details into system-level equations. Instead, ABM provides the ability to represent behaviours of energy consumers — such as individual households — using a range of theories, and to examine how the interaction of heterogeneous agents at the micro-level produces macro outcomes of importance to the global climate, such as the adoption of low-carbon behaviours and technologies over space and time. We provide an overview of ABM work in the area of consumer energy choices, with a focus on identifying specific ways in which ABM can improve understanding of both fundamental scientific and applied aspects of the demand side of energy to aid the design of better policies and programmes. Future research needs for improving the practice of ABM to better understand energy demand are also discussed.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Common elements of an ABM.


  1. 1

    Weber, C. & Perrels, A. Modelling lifestyle effects on energy demand and related emissions. Energ. Policy 28, 549–566 (2000).

  2. 2

    Dietz, T., Gardner, G. T., Gilligan, J., Stern, P. C. & Vandenbergh, M. P. Household actions can provide a behavioral wedge to rapidly reduce US carbon emissions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 18452–18456 (2009).

  3. 3

    Wilkerson, J. T., Cullenward, D., Davidian, D. & Weyant, J. P. End use technology choice in the national energy modeling system (NEMS): an analysis of the residential and commercial building sectors. Energ. Econ. 40, 773–784 (2013).

  4. 4

    Shavel, I. et al. Exploring Natural Gas and Renewables in ERCOT, Part III: The Role of Demand Response, Energy Efficiency, and Combined Heat & Power (The Brattle Group, 2014).

  5. 5

    Carrico, A. R., Vandenbergh, M. P., Stern, P. C. & Dietz, T. US climate policy needs behavioural science. Nature Clim. Change 5, 177–179 (2015).

  6. 6

    Ipakchi, A. & Albuyeh, F. Grid of the Future. IEEE Power Energ. Mag. 7, 52–62 (2009).

  7. 7

    Rai, V. & Robinson, S. A. Agent-based modeling of energy technology adoption: empirical integration of social, behavioral, economic, and environmental factors. Environ. Modell. Softw. 70, 163–177 (2015).

  8. 8

    Stokes, D. E. Pasteur's Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation (Brookings Institution, 1997).

  9. 9

    Clark, W. C. & Dickson, N. M. Sustainability science: the emerging research program. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 8059–8061 (2003).

  10. 10

    Kates, R. W. What kind of a science is sustainability science? Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 19449–19450 (2011).

  11. 11

    Worrell, E., Ramesohl, S. & Boyd, G. Advances in energy forecasting models based on engineering economics. Annu. Rev. Env. Resour. 29, 345–381 (2004).

  12. 12

    Loulou, R. & Labriet, M. ETSAP-TIAM: The TIMES Integrated Assessment Model Part I: model structure. Comput. Manag. Sci. 5, 7–40 (2008).

  13. 13

    Popp, D., Newell, R. G. & Jaffe, A. B. in Handbook of the Economics of Innovation Vol. 2 (eds Hall, B. H. & Rosenberg, N.) 873–937 (Elsevier, 2010).

  14. 14

    Kemp, R. & Volpi, M. The diffusion of clean technologies: a review with suggestions for future diffusion analysis. J. Clean. Prod. 16, S14–S21 (2008).

  15. 15

    Wilson, C. & Dowlatabadi, H. Models of decision making and residential energy use. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 32, 169–203 (2007).

  16. 16

    Aguirregabiria, V. & Mira, P. Dynamic discrete choice structural models: a survey. J. Econometrics 156, 38–67 (2010).

  17. 17

    Sargent, T. J. Evolution and intelligent design. Am. Econ. Rev. 98, 3–37 (2008).

  18. 18

    Tesfatsion, L. in Handbook of Computational Economics Vol. 2 (eds Tesfatsion, L. & Judd, K. L.) 831–880 (Elsevier, 2006).

  19. 19

    Dubé, J.-P., Hitsch, G. J. & Jindal, P. The joint identification of utility and discount functions from stated choice data: an application to durable goods adoption. QME-Quant. Mark. Econ. 12, 331–377 (2014).

  20. 20

    Henry, A. D. & Vollan, B. Networks and the challenge of sustainable development. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 39, 583–610 (2014).

  21. 21

    Kiesling, E., Günther, M., Stummer, C. & Wakolbinger, L. M. Agent-based simulation of innovation diffusion: a review. Cent. Eur. J. Oper. Re. 20, 183–230 (2012).

  22. 22

    Barabasi, A.-L. Linked: How Everything Is Connected to Everything Else and What It Means for Business, Science, and Everyday Life (Basic Books, 2014).

  23. 23

    Watts, D. J. Six Degrees: The Science of a Connected Age (Norton, 2003).

  24. 24

    Dietz, T., Fitzgerald, A. & Shwom, R. Environmental values. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 30, 335–372 (2005).

  25. 25

    Henry, A. D. The challenge of learning for sustainability: a prolegomenon to theory. Hum. Ecol. Rev. 16, 131–140 (2009).

  26. 26

    Axsen, J. & Kurani, K. S. Interpersonal influence within car buyers' social networks: applying five perspectives to plug-in hybrid vehicle drivers. Environ. Plann. A 44, 1047–1065 (2012).

  27. 27

    Claudy, M. C., Michelsen, C. & O'Driscoll, A. The diffusion of microgeneration technologies–assessing the influence of perceived product characteristics on home owners' willingness to pay. Energ. Policy 39, 1459–1469 (2011).

  28. 28

    Bollinger, B. & Gillingham, K. Peer effects in the diffusion of solar photovoltaic panels. Market. Sci. 31, 900–912 (2012).

  29. 29

    Noll, D., Dawes, C. & Rai, V. Solar community organizations and active peer effects in the adoption of residential PV. Energ. Policy 67, 330–343 (2014).

  30. 30

    Robinson, S. A. & Rai, V. Determinants of spatio-temporal patterns of energy technology adoption: an agent-based modeling approach. Appl. Energ. 151, 273–284 (2015).

  31. 31

    Durlauf, S. N. Complexity, economics, and public policy. Pol. Philos. Econ. 11, 45–75 (2012).

  32. 32

    Henry, A. D. & Dietz, T. Understanding environmental cognition. Organ. Environ. 25, 238–258 (2012).

  33. 33

    Easley, D. & Kleinberg, J. Networks, Crowds, and Markets: Reasoning About a Highly Connected World (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2010).

  34. 34

    An, L. Modeling human decisions in coupled human and natural systems: review of agent-based models. Ecol. Model. 229, 25–36 (2012).

  35. 35

    Filatova, T., Verburg, P. H., Parker, D. C. & Stannard, C. A. Spatial agent-based models for socio-ecological systems: challenges and prospects. Environ. Modell. Softw. 45, 1–7 (2013).

  36. 36

    Macal, C. M. & North, M. J. Tutorial on agent-based modelling and simulation. J. Simulat. 4, 151–162 (2010).

  37. 37

    Zhang, H., Vorobeychik, Y., Letchford, J. & Lakkaraju, K. in Proc. 2015 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems 513–521 (International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 2015).

  38. 38

    Valente, T. W. Network Models of the Diffusion of Innovations (Hampton, 1995).

  39. 39

    Helbing, D. & Balietti, S. in Social Self-Organization: Agent-Based Simulations and Experiments to Study Emergent Social Behavior 25–70 (Springer, 2013).

  40. 40

    Schelling, T. C. Micromotives and Macrobehavior (Norton, 2006).

  41. 41

    Epstein, J. M. Generative Social Science: Studies in Agent-Based Computational Modeling (Princeton Univ. Press, 2006).

  42. 42

    Gilbert, G. N. Agent-Based Models (Sage, 2008).

  43. 43

    Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., Abel, T., Guagnano, G. A. & Kalof, L. A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: the case of environmentalism. Hum. Ecol. Rev. 6, 81–87 (1999).

  44. 44

    Wolf, I., Schröder, T., Neumann, J. & de Haan, G. Changing minds about electric cars: an empirically grounded agent-based modeling approach. Technol. Forecast. Soc. 94, 269–285 (2015).

  45. 45

    Grimm, V. Pattern-oriented modeling of agent-based complex systems: lessons from ecology. Science 310, 987–991 (2005).

  46. 46

    Bonabeau, E. Agent-based modeling: methods and techniques for simulating human systems. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 7280–7287 (2002).

  47. 47

    Rand, W. & Rust, R. T. Agent-based modeling in marketing: guidelines for rigor. Int. J. Res. Mark. 28, 181–193 (2011).

  48. 48

    Eppstein, M. J., Grover, D. K., Marshall, J. S. & Rizzo, D. M. An agent-based model to study market penetration of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles. Energ. Policy 39, 3789–3802 (2011).

  49. 49

    Mueller, M. G. & de Haan, P. How much do incentives affect car purchase? Agent-based microsimulation of consumer choice of new cars — Part I: model structure, simulation of bounded rationality, and model validation. Energ. Policy 37, 1072–1082 (2009).

  50. 50

    Tran, M. Agent-behaviour and network influence on energy innovation diffusion. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. 17, 3682–3695 (2012).

  51. 51

    Zhang, T., Gensler, S. & Garcia, R. A study of the diffusion of alternative fuel vehicles: an agent-based modeling approach. J. Prod. Innovat. Manag. 28, 152–168 (2011).

  52. 52

    Günther, M., Stummer, C., Wakolbinger, L. M. & Wildpaner, M. An agent-based simulation approach for the new product diffusion of a novel biomass fuel. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 62, 12–20 (2011).

  53. 53

    Stummer, C., Kiesling, E., Günther, M. & Vetschera, R. Innovation diffusion of repeat purchase products in a competitive market: an agent-based simulation approach. Cent. Eur. J. Oper. Re. 245, 157–167 (2015).

  54. 54

    van Vliet, O., de Vries, B., Faaij, A., Turkenburg, W. & Jager, W. Multi-agent simulation of adoption of alternative fuels. Transport Res. D-Tr. E. 15, 326–342 (2010).

  55. 55

    Zhao, J., Mazhari, E., Celik, N. & Son, Y.-J. Hybrid agent-based simulation for policy evaluation of solar power generation systems. Simul. Model. Pract. Th. 19, 2189–2205 (2011).

  56. 56

    Kowalska-Pyzalska, A., Maciejowska, K., Suszczyński, K., Sznajd-Weron, K. & Weron, R. Turning green: agent-based modeling of the adoption of dynamic electricity tariffs. Energ. Policy 72, 164–174 (2014).

  57. 57

    Ma, T. & Nakamori, Y. Modeling technological change in energy systems – from optimization to agent-based modeling. Energy 34, 873–879 (2009).

  58. 58

    Kim, S., Lee, K., Cho, J. K. & Kim, C. O. Agent-based diffusion model for an automobile market with fuzzy TOPSIS-based product adoption process. Expert Syst. Appl. 38, 7270–7276 (2011).

  59. 59

    Sopha, B. M., Klöckner, C. A. & Hertwich, E. G. Adoption and diffusion of heating systems in Norway: coupling agent-based modeling with empirical research. Environ. Innovat. Soc. Trans. 8, 42–61 (2013).

  60. 60

    Rahmandad, H. & Sterman, J. Heterogeneity and network structure in the dynamics of diffusion: comparing agent-based and differential equation models. Manag. Sci. 54, 998–1014 (2008).

  61. 61

    Huang, Q., Parker, D. C., Filatova, T. & Sun, S. A review of urban residential choice models using agent-based modeling. Environ. Plann. B 41, 661–689 (2014).

  62. 62

    Narayanan, S. & Nair, H. S. Estimating causal installed-base effects: a bias-correction approach. J. Mark. Res. 50, 70–94 (2013).

  63. 63

    Rai, V. & Robinson, S. A. Effective information channels for reducing costs of environmentally-friendly technologies: evidence from residential PV markets. Environ. Res. Lett. 8, 014044 (2013).

  64. 64

    Kleinberg, J., Ludwig, J., Mullainathan, S. & Obermeyer, Z. Prediction policy problems. Am. Econ. Rev. 105, 491–495 (2015).

  65. 65

    Bidwell, D., Dietz, T. & Scavia, D. Fostering knowledge networks for climate adaptation. Nature Clim. Change 3, 610–611 (2013).

Download references


V.R. acknowledges support from the US Department of Energy under its Solar Energy Evolution and Diffusion Studies (SEEDS) programme within the SunShot Initiative (award no. DE-EE0006129) and from The University of Texas at Austin's Summer Research Assignment. A.D.H. also acknowledges support from the US Department of Energy SEEDS programme (award no. DE-AC36-08GO28308), as well as from the University of Arizona's Institute of the Environment.

Author information

V.R. and A.D.H. conceived, designed and co-wrote the paper.

Correspondence to Varun Rai.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information (PDF 329 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rai, V., Henry, A. Agent-based modelling of consumer energy choices. Nature Clim Change 6, 556–562 (2016).

Download citation

Further reading