Allo, M. & Loureiro, M. L. The role of social norms on preferences towards climate change policies: a meta-analysis. Energy Policy 73, 563–574 (2014).
Bernauer, T. Climate change politics. Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci. 16, 421–448 (2013).
Kachi, A., Bernauer, T. & Gampfer, R. Climate policy in hard times: are the pessimists right? Ecol. Econ. 114, 227–241 (2015).
Lam, S. P. Predicting support of climate policies by using a protection motivation model. Clim. Policy 15, 321–338 (2014).
Leiserowitz, A. et al. Public Support for Climate and Energy Policies in April 2013 (Yale Project on Climate Change Communication, Univ. Yale and Univ. George Mason, 2013).
McCright, A. M. & Dunlap, R. E. The politicization of climate change and polarization in the American public’s views of global warming. Sociol. Q. 52, 155–194 (2011).
McCright, A. M., Dunlap, R. E. & Marquart-Pyatt, S. T. Political ideology and views about climate change in the European Union. Environ. Polit. 25, 338–358 (2015).
Stehr, N. Climate policy: democracy is not an inconvenience. Nature 525, 449–450 (2015).
Stokes, B., Eike, R. & Carle, J. Global Concern about Climate Change, Broad Support for Limiting Emissions Pew Research Centers Global Attitudes Project (2015); http://www.pewglobal.org/files/2015/11/Pew-Research-Center-Climate-Change-Report-FINAL-November-5-2015.pdf
Bain, P. G. et al. Promoting pro-environmental action in climate change deniers. Nature Clim. Change 2, 600–603 (2012).
Bain, P. G. et al. Co-benefits of addressing climate change can motivate action around the world. Nature Clim. Change 6, 154–157 (2016).
Drews, S. & van den Bergh, J. What explains public support for climate policies? A review of empirical and experimental studies. Clim. Policy http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2015.1058240 (2015).
Hardisty, D. J., Johnson, E. J. & Weber, E. U. A dirty word or a dirty world? Attribute framing, political affiliation, and query theory. Psychol. Sci. 21, 86–92 (2009).
Hart, P. S. One or many? The influence of episodic and thematic climate change frames on policy preferences and individual behavior change. Sci. Commun. 33, 28–51 (2011).
Hart, P. S. & Nisbet, E. C. Boomerang effects in science communication: How motivated reasoning and identity cues amplify opinion polarization about climate mitigation policies. Commun. Res. 39, 701–723 (2012).
Lakoff, G. Why it matters how we frame the environment. Environ. Commun. 4, 70–81 (2010).
Lockwood, M. Does the framing of climate policies make a difference to public support? Evidence from UK marginal constituencies. Clim. Policy 11, 1097–1112 (2011).
Myers, T. A. et al. A public health frame arouses hopeful emotions about climate change. Climatic Change 113, 1105–1112 (2012).
Petrovic, N., Madrigano, J. & Zaval, L. Motivating mitigation: when health matters more than climate change. Climatic Change 126, 245–254 (2014).
Parag, Y., Capstick, S. & Poortinga, W. Policy attribute framing: a comparison between three policy instruments for personal emissions reduction. J. Policy Anal. Manage. 30, 889–905 (2011).
Smith, N. & Leiserowitz, A. The role of emotion in global warming support and opposition. Risk Anal. 34, 937–948 (2013).
Druckman, J. N. The implications of framing effects for citizen competence. Polit. Behav. 23, 225–256 (2001).
Boykoff, M. T. Media discourse on the climate slowdown. Nature Clim. Change 4, 156–158 (2014).
Elsasser, S. W. & Dunlap, R. E. Leading voices in the denier choir: conservative columnists’ dismissal of global warming and denigration of climate science. Am. Behav. Sci. 57, 754–776 (2013).
Mayer, F. M. Stories of Climate Change: Competing Narratives, the Media, and U.S. Public Opinion 2001–2010 Joan Shorenstein Center on the Press, Politics and Public Policy Discussion Paper Series #D-72 (2012); http://shorensteincenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/d72_mayer.pdf
O’Neill, S., Williams, H. T. P., Kurz, T., Wiersma, B. & Bookoff, M. Dominant frames in legacy and social media coverage of the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report. Nature Clim. Change 5, 380–385 (2015).
Painter, J. Poles Apart: the International Reporting of Climate Scepticism (Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, 2011).
Druckman, J. N. & Leeper, T. J. Learning more from political communication experiments: pretreatment and its effects. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 56, 875–896 (2012).
Kahan, D. M. et al. The polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks. Nature Clim. Change 2, 732–735 (2012).