Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Response of Arctic temperature to changes in emissions of short-lived climate forcers


There is growing scientific1,2 and political3,4 interest in the impacts of climate change and anthropogenic emissions on the Arctic. Over recent decades temperatures in the Arctic have increased at twice the global rate, largely as a result of ice–albedo and temperature feedbacks5,6,7,8. Although deep cuts in global CO2 emissions are required to slow this warming, there is also growing interest in the potential for reducing short-lived climate forcers (SLCFs; refs 9,10). Politically, action on SLCFs may be particularly promising because the benefits of mitigation are seen more quickly than for mitigation of CO2 and there are large co-benefits in terms of improved air quality11. This Letter is one of the first to systematically quantify the Arctic climate impact of regional SLCFs emissions, taking into account black carbon (BC), sulphur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen oxides (NOx), volatile organic compounds (VOCs), organic carbon (OC) and tropospheric ozone (O3), and their transport processes and transformations in the atmosphere. This study extends the scope of previous works2,12 by including more detailed calculations of Arctic radiative forcing and quantifying the Arctic temperature response. We find that the largest Arctic warming source is from emissions within the Asian nations owing to the large absolute amount of emissions. However, the Arctic is most sensitive, per unit mass emitted, to SLCFs emissions from a small number of activities within the Arctic nations themselves. A stringent, but technically feasible mitigation scenario for SLCFs, phased in from 2015 to 2030, could cut warming by 0.2 (±0.17) K in 2050.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Model-mean annual Arctic equilibrium surface temperature response.
Figure 2: Annual mean Arctic equilibrium surface temperature response per unit of emissions due to direct forcing of BC, BC in snow, and direct and indirect forcing from OC and sulphate averaged over the models.
Figure 3: Contribution to annual mean reductions of Arctic surface temperatures in 2050 due to mitigation of SLCFs according to the MIT mitigation scenario.


  1. 1

    Fyfe, J. C. et al. One hundred years of Arctic surface temperature variation due to anthropogenic influence. Sci. Rep. 3, 2645 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Quinn, P. K. et al. The Impact of Black Carbon on Arctic Climate (Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme (AMAP), 2011).

  3. 3

    Time to Act to Reduce Short-lived Climate Pollutants (Climate and Clean Air Coalition, UNEP, 2014);

  4. 4

    Summary for Policy-makers: Arctic Climate Issues 2015 (Monitoring and Assessment Programme (AMAP), 2015).

  5. 5

    Hartmann, D. L. et al. in Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) 159–254 (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Screen, J. A. & Simmonds, I. The central role of diminishing sea ice in recent Arctic temperature amplification. Nature 464, 1334–1337 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Stroeve, J. C. et al. Trends in Arctic sea ice extent from CMIP5, CMIP3 and observations. Geophys. Res. Lett. 39, L16502 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Pithan, F. & Mauritsen, T. Arctic amplification dominated by temperature feedbacks in contemporary climate models. Nature Geosci. 7, 181–184 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Near-Term Climate Protection and Clean Air Benefits: Actions for Controlling Short-Lived Climate Forcers (UNEP, 2011);

  10. 10

    Shindell, D. T. et al. Simultaneously mitigating near-term climate change and improving human health and food security. Science 335, 183–189 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Iyer, G. C. et al. Improved representation of investment decisions in assessments of CO2 mitigation. Nature Clim. Change 5, 436–440 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Quinn, P. K. et al. Short-lived pollutants in the Arctic: Their climate impact and possible mitigation strategies. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 8, 1723–1735 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Hansen, J. & Nazarenko, L. Soot climate forcing via snow and ice albedos. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 423–428 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Jacobson, M. Z. Climate response of fossil fuel and biofuel soot, accounting for soot’s feedback to snow and sea ice albedo and emissivity. J. Geophys. Res. 109, D21201 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Flanner, M. G., Zender, C. S., Randerson, J. T. & Rasch, P. J. Present-day climate forcing and response from black carbon in snow. J. Geophys. Res. 112, 2156–2202 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Bond, T. C. et al. Bounding the role of black carbon in the climate system: A scientific assessment. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 118, 5380–5552 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Seinfeld, J. H. & Pandis, S. N. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics: From Air Pollution to Climate Change 2nd edn (Wiley, 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Shindell, D. T. & Faluvegi, G. Climate response to regional radiative forcing during the twentieth century. Nature Geosci. 2, 294–300 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Shindell, D. T. Evaluation of the absolute regional temperature potential. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 12, 7955–7960 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Collins, W. J. et al. Global and regional temperature-change potentials for near-term climate forcers. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 13, 2471–2485 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Flanner, M. G. Arctic climate sensitivity to local black carbon. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 118, 1840–1851 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Sand, M. et al. The Arctic response to remote and local forcing of black carbon. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 13, 211–224 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Klimont, Z. et al. ECLIPSE v4a: Global Emission Data Set Developed with the GAINS Model for the Period 2005 to 2050: Key Features and Principal Data Sources (International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), 2013);

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Stohl, A. et al. Evaluating the climate and air quality impacts of short-lived pollutants. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 15, 10529–10566 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Najafi, M. R., Zwiers, F. W. & Gillett, N. P. Attribution of Arctic temperature change to greenhouse-gas and aerosol influences. Nature Clim. Change 5, 246–249 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Amman, M. (ed.) Future Emissions of Air Pollutants in Europe–Current Legislation Baseline and the Scope for Further Reductions TSAP Report No. 1, version 1.0 (DG-Environment of the European Commission, 2012).

  27. 27

    Quaas, J. et al. Aerosol indirect effects—general circulation model intercomparison and evaluation with satellite data. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 9, 8697–8717 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    van Vuuren, D. et al. Stabilizing greenhouse gas concentrations at low levels: An assessment of reduction strategies and costs. Climatic Change 81, 119–159 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Riahi, K., Gruebler, A. & Nakicenovic, N. Scenarios of long-term socio-economic and environmental development under climate stabilization. Technol. Forecast. Soc. 74, 887–935 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30

    Victor, D. G. Global Warming Gridlock: Creating More Effective Strategies for Protecting the Planet (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2011).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  31. 31

    Hansen, J. M. et al. Climate simulations for 1880–2003 with GISS modelE. Clim. Dynam. 29, 661–696 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32

    Gettelman, A., Kay, J. E. & Shell, K. M. The evolution of climate sensitivity and climate feedbacks in the Community Atmosphere Model. J. Clim. 25, 1453–1469 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33

    Boucher, O. & Reddy, M. S. Climate trade-off between black carbon and carbon dioxide emissions. Energy Policy 36, 193–200 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


This paper was developed as part of the Arctic Monitoring Assessment Programme (AMAP). The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Union Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007–2013) under grant agreement no 282688—ECLIPSE. M.S. was supported by The Norwegian Research Council by grant number 235548/E10, CRAICC and through the NOTUR/Norstore project. K.v.S. acknowledges support by NSERC through the Canadian NETCARE research network. M.G.F. was also supported by NSF ARC-1253154. Contributions by SMHI were funded by the Swedish Environmental Protection Agency under contract NV-09414-12 and through the Swedish Clean Air and Climate Research Program (Scac).

Author information




M.G.F., K.v.S., J.L., T.K.B. and M.S. conceived, designed and performed the model simulations and analysed the data; M.S. made the figures and led the writing of the paper. All authors contributed to the writing of the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Sand.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sand, M., Berntsen, T., von Salzen, K. et al. Response of Arctic temperature to changes in emissions of short-lived climate forcers. Nature Clim Change 6, 286–289 (2016).

Download citation

Further reading


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing