Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Perspective
  • Published:

Roadmap towards justice in urban climate adaptation research

A Corrigendum to this article was published on 25 May 2016

This article has been updated

Abstract

The 2015 United Nations Climate Change Conference in Paris (COP21) highlighted the importance of cities to climate action, as well as the unjust burdens borne by the world's most disadvantaged peoples in addressing climate impacts. Few studies have documented the barriers to redressing the drivers of social vulnerability as part of urban local climate change adaptation efforts, or evaluated how emerging adaptation plans impact marginalized groups. Here, we present a roadmap to reorient research on the social dimensions of urban climate adaptation around four issues of equity and justice: (1) broadening participation in adaptation planning; (2) expanding adaptation to rapidly growing cities and those with low financial or institutional capacity; (3) adopting a multilevel and multi-scalar approach to adaptation planning; and (4) integrating justice into infrastructure and urban design processes. Responding to these empirical and theoretical research needs is the first step towards identifying pathways to more transformative adaptation policies.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 26 April 2016

    In the version of this Perspective originally published, it was not acknowledged that this work was contributing to the ICTA 'Unit of Excellence'. This correction has been made to the online version.

References

  1. Dodman, D. & Satterthwaite, D. Institutional capacity, climate change adaptation and the urban poor. IDS Bull. 39, 67–74 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Roberts, J. T. The international dimension of climate justice and the need for international adaptation funding. Environ. Justice 2, 185–190 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Anguelovski, I., Chu, E. & Carmin, J. Variations in approaches to urban climate adaptation: experiences and experimentation from the global South. Glob. Environ. Chang. 27, 156–167 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Carmin, J., Dodman, D. & Chu, E. Urban Climate Adaptation and Leadership: From Conceptual to Practical Understanding (OECD, 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chu, E., Anguelovski, I. & Carmin, J. Inclusive approaches to urban climate adaptation planning and implementation in the Global South. Clim. Policy 1–21 (2015).

  6. Preston, B. L., Mustelin, J. & Maloney, M. C. Climate adaptation heuristics and the science/policy divide. Mitig. Adapt. Strateg. Glob. Chang. 20, 467–497 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Nalau, J., Preston, B. L. & Maloney, M. C. Is adaptation a local responsibility? Environ. Sci. Policy 48, 89–98 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rawls, J. A Theory of Justice. (Harvard Univ. Press, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Walzer, M. Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality (Basic Books, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Young, I. M. Justice and the Politics of Difference. (Princeton Univ. Press, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Honneth, A. Integrity and disrespect: principles of a conception of morality based on the theory of recognition. Polit. Theory 20, 187–201 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Stone, D. Policy Paradox: The Art of Political Decision Making (W. W. Norton, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Freudenberg, N., Pastor, M. & Israel, B. Strengthening community capacity to participate in making decisions to reduce disproportionate environmental exposures. Am. J. Public Health 101, S123–S130 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Shrader-Frechette, K. Environmental Justice: Creating Equality, Reclaiming Democracy (Oxford Univ. Press, 2002).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Schlosberg, D. Defining Environmental Justice: Theories, Movement, and Nature (Oxford Univ. Press, 2007).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. Sen, A. Development as Freedom. (Anchor, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Nussbaum, M. C. Creating Capabilities: The Human Development Approach (Belknap, 2011).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. Soja, E. Seeking Spatial Justice (Univ. Minnesota Press, 2010).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. Marcuse, P. et al. Searching for the Just City: Debates in Urban Theory and Practice (Routledge, 2009).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. Gould, K. A., Pellow, D. N. & Schnaiberg, A. The Treadmill of Production: Injustice and Unsustainability in the Global Economy (Paradigm, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lefebvre, H. The Production of Space (Wiley-Blackwell, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mohai, P., Pellow, D. N. & Roberts, J. T. Environmental justice. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 34, 405–430 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Watts, N. et al. Health and climate change: policy responses to protect public health. Lancet 386, 1861–1914 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Moser, C. & Satterthwaite, D. in Social Dimensions of Climate Change: Equity and Vulnerability in a Warming World (eds Mearns, R. & Norton, A.) 231–258 (World Bank, 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  25. IPCC Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability (eds Field, C. B. et al.) (Cambridge University Press, 2014).

  26. Carmin, J. & Agyeman, J. Environmental Inequalities Beyond Borders: Local Perspectives on Global Injustices (MIT, 2011).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  27. Pellow, D. N. D. N. Environmental inequality formation: toward a theory of environmental injustice. Am. Behav. Sci. 43, 581–601 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Reale, A. & Handmer, J. Land tenure, disasters and vulnerability. Disasters 35, 160–182 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Archer, D. et al. Moving towards inclusive urban adaptation: approaches to integrating community-based adaptation to climate change at city and national scale. Clim. Dev. 6, 345–356 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Bulkeley, H., Carmin, J., Castán Broto, V., Edwards, G. A. S. & Fuller, S. Climate justice and global cities: mapping the emerging discourses. Glob. Environ. Chang. 23, 914–925 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Dodman, D. & Mitlin, D. Challenges for community-based adaptation: discovering the potential for transformation. J. Int. Dev. 25, 640–659 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Ayers, J. & Forsyth, T. Community-based adaptation to climate change. Environ. Sci. Policy Sustain. Dev. 51, 22–31 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Nay, J. J., Abkowitz, M., Chu, E., Gallagher, D. & Wright, H. A review of decision-support models for adaptation to climate change in the context of development. Clim. Dev. 6, 357–367 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Tschakert, P. & Dietrich, K. A. Anticipatory learning for climate change adaptation and resilience. Ecol. Soc. 15, 11–34 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Few, R., Brown, K. & Tompkins, E. L. Public participation and climate change adaptation: avoiding the illusion of inclusion. Clim. Policy 7, 46–59 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Barnett, J. & O'Neill, S. Maladaptation. Glob. Environ. Chang. 20, 211–213 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Kates, R. W., Travis, W. R. & Wilbanks, T. J. Transformational adaptation when incremental adaptations to climate change are insufficient. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, 7156–7161 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Pelling, M., O'Brien, K. & Matyas, D. Adaptation and transformation. Clim. Change 133, 113–127 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Pelling, M. & Dill, K. Disaster politics: tipping points for change in the adaptation of sociopolitical regimes. Prog. Hum. Geogr. 34, 21–37 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Schlosberg, D. Climate justice and capabilities: a framework for adaptation policy. Ethics Int. Aff. 26, 445–461 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Klinsky, S. & Dowlatabadi, H. Conceptualizations of justice in climate policy. Clim. Policy 9, 88–108 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Wilkinson, C. Social-ecological resilience: insights and issues for planning theory. Plan. Theory 11, 148–169 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Brown, K. Global environmental change I: a social turn for resilience? Prog. Hum. Geogr. 38, 107–117 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Hughes, S. Justice in urban climate change adaptation: criteria and application to Delhi. Ecol. Soc. 18, 48 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Bulkeley, H., Edwards, G. A. S. & Fuller, S. Contesting climate justice in the city: examining politics and practice in urban climate change experiments. Glob. Environ. Chang. 25, 31–40 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Bulkeley, H. Cities and the governing of climate change. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 35, 229–253 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Carmin, J., Anguelovski, I. & Roberts, D. Urban climate adaptation in the Global South: planning in an emerging policy domain. J. Plan. Educ. Res. 32, 18–32 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Aylett, A. Progress and Challenges in the Urban Governance of Climate Change: Results of a Global Survey (MIT, 2014).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Aylett, A. Institutionalizing the urban governance of climate change adaptation: Results of an international survey. Urban Clim. 14, 4–16 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Forsyth, T. Community-based adaptation: a review of past and future challenges. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Clim. Chang. 4, 439–446 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Carmin, J., Nadkarni, N. & Rhie, C. Progress and Challenges in Urban Climate Adaptation Planning: Results of a Global Survey (DUSP, MIT, 2012).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Jonsson, A. C. et al. Cities' capacity to manage climate vulnerability: experiences from participatory vulnerability assessments in the lower Göta Älv Catchment, Sweden. Local Environ. 17, 735–750 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Carmin, J. et al. in Climate Change and Society: Sociological Perspectives (eds Dunlap, R. E. & Brulle, R. J.) 164–198 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2015).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  54. Morello-Frosch, R., Pastor, M., Sadd, J. & Shonkoff, S. The Climate Gap: Inequalities in How Climate Change Hurts Americans & How to Close the Gap (PERE, Univ. Southern California, 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Westerhoff, L., Keskitalo, E. C. H. & Juhola, S. Capacities across scales: local to national adaptation policy in four European countries. Clim. Policy 11, 1071–1085 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Shi, L., Chu, E. & Debats, J. Explaining progress in climate adaptation planning across 156 U.S. municipalities. J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 81, 191–202 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Ciplet, D., Roberts, J. T. & Khan, M. The politics of international climate adaptation funding: justice and divisions in the greenhouse. Glob. Environ. Polit. 13, 49–68 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Bulkeley, H. et al. in Cities and Climate Change: Responding to an Urgent Agenda (eds Hoornweg, D. et al.) 125–159 (World Bank, 2011).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  59. Fünfgeld, H. Facilitating local climate change adaptation through transnational municipal networks. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 12, 67–73 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Giest, S. & Howlett, M. Comparative climate change governance: lessons from European transnational municipal network management efforts. Environ. Policy Gov. 23, 341–353 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Kern, K. & Bulkeley, H. Cities, Europeanization and multi-level governance: governing climate change through transnational municipal networks. J. Common Mark. Stud. 47, 309–332 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Bulkeley, H. et al. Transnational Climate Change Governance. (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  63. Lee, T. Global cities and transnational climate change networks. Glob. Environ. Polit. 13, 108–128 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Hamin, E. M., Gurran, N. & Emlinger, A. M. Barriers to municipal climate adaptation: examples from coastal massachusetts' smaller cities and towns. J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 80, 110–122 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Measham, T. G. et al. Adapting to climate change through local municipal planning: barriers and challenges. Mitig. Adapt. Strateg. Glob. Chang. 16, 889–909 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Bulkeley, H., Castán Broto, V. & Edwards, G. A. S. An Urban Politics of Climate Change: Experimentation and the Governing of Socio-Technical Transitions (Routledge, 2015).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Vogel, B. & Henstra, D. Studying local climate adaptation: a heuristic research framework for comparative policy analysis. Glob. Environ. Chang. 31, 110–120 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Mukheibir, P., Kuruppu, N., Gero, A. & Herriman, J. Overcoming cross-scale challenges to climate change adaptation for local government: a focus on Australia. Clim. Change 121, 271–283 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Bauer, A. & Steurer, R. Multi-level governance of climate change adaptation through regional partnerships in Canada and England. Geoforum 51, 121–29 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Hallegatte, S. & Corfee-Morlot, J. Understanding climate change impacts, vulnerability and adaptation at city scale: an introduction. Clim. Change 104, 1–12 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Reid, H. & Huq, S. Mainstreaming community-based adaptation into national and local planning. Clim. Dev. 6, 291–292 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Bulkeley, H. & Betsill, M. M. Revisiting the urban politics of climate change. Env. Polit. 22, 136–154 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Hodson, M. & Marvin, S. World Cities and Climate Change: Producing Urban Ecological Security (Open Univ. Press, 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  74. Corfee-Morlot, J., Cochran, I., Hallegatte, S. & Teasdale, P.-J. Multilevel risk governance and urban adaptation policy. Clim. Change 104, 169–197 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Tanner, T., Mitchell, T., Polack, E. & Guenther, B. Urban Governance for Adaptation: Assessing Climate Change Resilience in Ten Asian Cities Working Paper (Institute of Development Studies, 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  76. Padt, F., Opdam, P., Polman, N. & Termeer, C. Scale-sensitive Governance of the Environment. (Wiley-Blackwell, 2014).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  77. Termeer, C. et al. The regional governance of climate adaptation: a framework for developing legitimate, effective, and resilient governance arrangements. Clim. Law 2, 159–179 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Wilbanks, T. J. & Kates, R. W. Beyond adapting to climate change: embedding adaptation in responses to multiple threats and stresses. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 100, 719–728 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Harvey, D. Justice, Nature and the Geography of Difference (Blackwell, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  80. Birkmann, J., Garschagen, M., Kraas, F. & Quang, N. Adaptive urban governance: new challenges for the second generation of urban adaptation strategies to climate change. Sustain. Sci. 5, 185–206 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Garschagen, M. & Kraas, F. in Resilient Cities: Cities and Adaptation to Climate Change Proceedings of the Global Forum 2010 (ed. Otto-Zimmermann, K.) 131–139 (Springer, 2011).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  82. City Resilience Framework: City Resilience Index (ARUP, 2014).

  83. Tyler, S. & Moench, M. A framework for urban climate resilience. Clim. Dev. 4, 311–326 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Altshuler, A. & Luberhoff, D. Mega-projects: The Changing Politics of Urban Public Investment. (Brookings Institution, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  85. Flyvberg, B., Bruzelius, N. & Rothengatter, W. Megaprojects and Risk: An Anatomy of Ambition. (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2003).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  86. Harman, B. P., Taylor, B. M. & Lane, M. B. Urban partnerships and climate adaptation: challenges and opportunities. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 12, 74–79 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Graham, S. & Marvin, S. Splintering Urbanism: Networked Infrastructures, Technological Mobilities and the Urban Condition (Routledge, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  88. Pickett, S. T. A., Cadenasso, M. L. & McGrath, B. Resilience in Ecology and Urban Design Linking Theory and Practice for Sustainable Cities (Springer, 2013).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  89. Steiner, F. Landscape ecological urbanism: origins and trajectories. Landsc. Urban Plan. 100, 333–337 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Bélanger, P. Landscape as infrastructure. Landsc. J. 28, 79–95 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Parks, B. C. & Roberts, J. T. Globalization, vulnerability to climate change, and perceived injustice. Soc. Nat. Resour. 19, 337–355 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Matyas, D. & Pelling, M. Positioning resilience for 2015: the role of resistance, incremental adjustment and transformation in disaster risk management policy. Disasters 39, s1–s18 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Barrett, S. The necessity of a multiscalar analysis of climate justice. Prog. Hum. Geogr. 37, 215–233 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This paper is dedicated to JoAnn Carmin (1957–2014), Associate Professor of Environmental Policy and Planning at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). We are grateful to the MIT Department of Urban Studies and Planning for hosting the Carmin Memorial Symposium on Urban Climate Adaptation (December 2014), and to the many scholars, practitioners and students who participated in the symposium and contributed their insights. This work is contributing to the ICTA ‘Unit of Excellence’ (MINECO, MDM 2015-0552).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

L.S. led the organization of the Carmin Memorial Symposium, the development of the paper, and together with E.C. drafted the introduction, third roadmap section and conclusion; I.A., J.D., and T.S. drafted the literature review; A.A. drafted the first roadmap section; K.C.S. drafted the second; K.G. drafted the fourth; all authors, especially D.D., D.R., J.T.R. and S.V., reviewed and edited the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Linda Shi.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shi, L., Chu, E., Anguelovski, I. et al. Roadmap towards justice in urban climate adaptation research. Nature Clim Change 6, 131–137 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2841

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2841

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing