Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Policy assessments to enhance EU scientific advice

Nature Climate Change volume 6, pages 15–17 (2016)Cite this article

Subjects

The European Commission needs to amend its new Scientific Advice Mechanism. Highly integrated, participatory assessments of policy alternatives are required for multidimensional, value-laden policy issues such as the European Union's climate and energy policies.

After the much-disputed axing of Anne Glover's post of Chief Scientific Adviser1,2, the European Commission is putting together the nuts and bolts of its new, more elaborate Scientific Advice Mechanism (SAM)3. By the end of October this year, a trio of scouts (Sir David King, Rianne Letschert and António Vitorino), known as the 'Identification Committee', is tasked with recommending seven eminent scholars as members of a High Level Group to advise the Commission3. The operational support unit assisting the Group will be well funded compared with Glover's former team. The new SAM wants the Group to cooperate with institutions such as the European scientific academies and the European Union's Joint Research Centre in a structured relationship. This new SAM is a compromise between different science-policy approaches in the EU member states4.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Key characteristics of integrated policy assessments.

References

  1. Alemanno, A. Eur. J. Risk Regul. 5, 286–292 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Glover, A. in Future Direction for Scientific Advice in Europe (eds Wilsdon, J. et al.) 60–81 (CSAP, 2015).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Abbott, A. Nature http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature.2015.17557 (2015).

  4. Wilsdon, J. Science 348, 947 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Rimkutė, D. & Haverland, M. Comp. Eur. Polit. 13, 430–449 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gornitzka, Å. & Sverdrup, U. West. Eur. Polit. 34, 48–70 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. IPCC Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change (eds Edenhofer O. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014).

  8. Siegmeier, J., Mattauch, L. & Edenhofer, O. CESifo 5161 (2015); http://go.nature.com/K1b1ee

  9. Edenhofer, O. & Kowarsch, M . Environ. Sci. Policy 51, 56–64 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gornitzka, Å. & Holst, C. Polit. Govern. 3, 1–12 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Grand Societal Challenges as a Topic for Science Policy (Wissenschaftsrat (German Council of Science and Humanities), 2015); http://go.nature.com/7teM7h

  12. Victor, D. G. Nature 520, 27–29 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Douglas, H. E. Science, Policy, and the Value-Free Ideal (Univ. Pittsburgh Press, 2009).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Christensen, J. Polit. Govern. 3, 13–25 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sarkki, S. et al. Environ. Sci. Policy 54, 505–512 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Biewald, A., Kowarsch, M., Lotze-Campen, H. & Gerten, D. Global Environ. Chang. 30, 80–91 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Beck, S. et al. GAIA 23, 80–87 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gornitzka, Å. & Sverdrup, U. Polit. Govern. 3, 151–165 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Reed, M. S. Biol. Conserv. 141, 2417–2431 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Dreger, J. The European Commission's Energy and Climate Policy. A Climate for Expertise? (Palgrave Macmillan, 2014).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  21. Watson, R. T. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 360, 471–477 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Edenhofer, O. & Minx, J. Science 345, 37–38 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Knopf, B. et al. Clim. Change Econ. 4, 1340001 (2013); http://go.nature.com/COzx27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Stocker, T. F. & Plattner, G.-K. Nature 513, 163–165 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work benefited from B. Knopf's comments and from an expert workshop on the new EU SAM organized by Stiftung Mercator (Berlin, June 2015).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Martin Kowarsch is at the Mercator Research Institute on Global Commons and Climate Change (MCC), Torgauer Strasse 12–15, 10829 Berlin, Germany,

    Martin Kowarsch

Authors
  1. Martin Kowarsch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Kowarsch.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kowarsch, M. Policy assessments to enhance EU scientific advice. Nature Clim Change 6, 15–17 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2835

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2835

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing