Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

A top-down approach to projecting market impacts of climate change

Nature Climate Change volume 6, pages 51–55 (2016)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

To evaluate policies to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions, economic models require estimates of how future climate change will affect well-being. So far, nearly all estimates of the economic impacts of future warming have been developed by combining estimates of impacts in individual sectors of the economy1,2. Recent work has used variation in warming over time and space to produce top-down estimates of how past climate and weather shocks have affected economic output3,4,5. Here we propose a statistical framework for converting these top-down estimates of past economic costs of regional warming into projections of the economic cost of future global warming. Combining the latest physical climate models, socioeconomic projections, and economic estimates of past impacts, we find that future warming could raise the expected rate of economic growth in richer countries, reduce the expected rate of economic growth in poorer countries, and increase the variability of growth by increasing the climate’s variability. This study suggests we should rethink the focus on global impacts and the use of deterministic frameworks for modelling impacts and policy.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Schematic of methodology for calculating regional impacts of climate change.
Figure 2: Effects of climate on economic growth through changing averages and changing variability.
Figure 3: Distribution of change in growth rate as a function of inequality aversion (η).

References

  1. Nordhaus, W. D. & Boyer, J. Warming the World: Economic Models of Global Warming (MIT Press, 2000).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Tol, R. S. J. The economic effects of climate change. J. Econ. Perspect. 23, 29–51 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Nordhaus, W. D. Geography and macroeconomics: New data and new findings. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 3510–3517 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Dell, M., Jones, B. F. & Olken, B. A. Temperature and income: Reconciling new cross-sectional and panel estimates. Am. Econ. Rev. 99, 198–204 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dell, M., Jones, B. F. & Olken, B. A. Temperature shocks and economic growth: Evidence from the last half century. Am. Econ. J. 4, 66–95 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Nordhaus, W. D. Cowles Foundation Discussion Paper 565 (Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Nordhaus, W. D. To slow or not to slow: The economics of the greenhouse effect. Econ. J. 101, 920–937 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Nordhaus, W. D. An optimal transition path for controlling greenhouse gases. Science 258, 1315–1319 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Warren, R. et al. Tyndall Centre Working Paper 91 (Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, Univ. East Anglia, 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hanemann, M. in Climate Change Science and Policy (eds Schneider, S. H., Rosencranz, A., Mastrandrea, M. D. & Kuntz-Duriseti, K.) 185–193 (Island Press, 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Roughgarden, T. & Schneider, S. H. Climate change policy: Quantifying uncertainties for damages and optimal carbon taxes. Energy Policy 27, 415–429 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Newbold, S. C. & Daigneault, A. Climate response uncertainty and the benefits of greenhouse gas emissions reductions. Environ. Res. Econ. 44, 351–377 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ackerman, F., Stanton, E. A. & Bueno, R. Fat tails, exponents, extreme uncertainty: Simulating catastrophe in DICE. Ecol. Econ. 69, 1657–1665 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ackerman, F. & Stanton, E. A. Climate risks and carbon prices: Revising the social cost of carbon. Economics 6, 2012-10 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Botzen, W. W. & van den Bergh, J. C. How sensitive is Nordhaus to Weitzman? Climate policy in DICE with an alternative damage function. Econ. Lett. 117, 372–374 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kopp, R. E., Golub, A., Keohane, N. O. & Onda, C. The influence of the specification of climate change damages on the social cost of carbon. Economics 6, 2012-13 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Weitzman, M. L. GHG targets as insurance against catastrophic climate damages. J. Public Econ. Theory 14, 221–244 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lemoine, D. & McJeon, H. C. Trapped between two tails: Trading off scientific uncertainties via climate targets. Environ. Res. Lett. 8, 034019 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Pindyck, R. S. Climate change policy: What do the models tell us? J. Econ. Lit. 51, 860–872 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Stern, N. The structure of economic modelling of the potential impacts of climate change: Grafting gross underestimation of risk onto already narrow science models. J. Econ. Lit. 51, 838–859 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Horowitz, J. K. The income-temperature relationship in a cross-section of countries and its implications for predicting the effects of global warming. Environ. Resour. Econ. 44, 475–493 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bansal, R. & Ochoa, M. Working Paper 17575 (National Bureau of Economic Research, 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Dell, M., Jones, B. F. & Olken, B. A. What do we learn from the weather? The new climate–economy literature. J. Econ. Lit. 52, 740–798 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Moore, F. C. & Diaz, D. B. Temperature impacts on economic growth warrant stringent mitigation policy. Nature Clim. Change 5, 127–131 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lee, J.-Y. & Wang, B. Future change of global monsoon in the CMIP5. Clim. Dynam. 42, 101–119 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Fankhauser, S., Tol, R. S. J. & Pearce, D. W. The aggregation of climate change damages: A welfare theoretic approach. Environ. Resour. Econ. 10, 249–266 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Azar, C. Weight factors in cost-benefit analysis of climate change. Environ. Resour. Econ. 13, 249–268 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Gollier, C. & Hammitt, J. K. The long-run discount rate controversy. Annu. Rev. Resour. Econ. 6, 273–295 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Anthoff, D., Hepburn, C. & Tol, R. S. J. Equity weighting and the marginal damage costs of climate change. Ecol. Econ. 68, 836–849 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. van Vuuren, D. P. et al. The representative concentration pathways: An overview. Climatic Change 109, 5–31 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Delworth, T. L. et al. Simulated climate and climate change in the GFDL CM2.5 high-resolution coupled climate model. J. Clim. 25, 2755–2781 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. O’Neill, B. C. et al. A new scenario framework for climate change research: The concept of shared socioeconomic pathways. Climatic Change 122, 387–400 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Schär, C. et al. The role of increasing temperature variability in European summer heatwaves. Nature 427, 332–336 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Seager, R., Naik, N. & Vogel, L. Does global warming cause intensified interannual hydroclimate variability? J. Clim. 25, 3355–3372 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Hansen, J., Sato, M. & Ruedy, R. Perception of climate change. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, E2415–E2423 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Huntingford, C., Jones, P. D., Livina, V. N., Lenton, T. M. & Cox, P. M. No increase in global temperature variability despite changing regional patterns. Nature 500, 327–330 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Nordhaus, W. D. A Question of Balance: Weighing the Options on Global Warming Policies (Yale University Press, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Nordhaus, W. Estimates of the social cost of carbon: Concepts and results from the DICE-2013R model and alternative approaches. J. Assoc. Environ. Res. Econ. 1, 273–312 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Weitzman, M. L. A review of the Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change. J. Econ. Lit. 45, 703–724 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Dasgupta, P. Discounting climate change. J. Risk Uncertain. 37, 141–169 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Lemoine, D. M. Climate sensitivity distributions depend on the possibility that models share biases. J. Clim. 23, 4395–4415 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

D.L. is grateful for support from Resources for the Future’s John V. Krutilla Research Stipend and the University of Arizona’s Institute of the Environment. S.K.’s research was supported by the National Science Foundation under award No. 1331373. The Dissertations Initiative for the Advancement of Climate Change Research (DISCCRS) played a crucial role in connecting the authors and stimulating the project. G. Moreno and C. Raphael provided research and graphical design assistance, respectively.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Economics, McClelland 401, University of Arizona, 1130 E. Helen Street, Tucson, Arizona 85721, USA

    Derek Lemoine

  2. Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Princeton, New Jersey 08540, USA

    Sarah Kapnick

Authors
  1. Derek Lemoine
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sarah Kapnick
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

D.L. led the experimental design and writing of the manuscript. S.K. provided GFDL climate model data and contributed to the writing of the manuscript. Both authors helped to interpret the results.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Derek Lemoine.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lemoine, D., Kapnick, S. A top-down approach to projecting market impacts of climate change. Nature Clim Change 6, 51–55 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2759

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2759

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing